Not applicable.
Not applicable.
During drilling of an oil and/or gas well, drill pipe may be rotated and/or dragged against a wall of a wellbore, causing wall thickness of the drill pipe to erode. This may significantly reduce the life of the drill pipe and may result in high operational costs for the drilling contractor, due to the need to replace the worn drill pipe.
In an embodiment, a drill pipe comprises a first tool joint; a second tool joint; and a tubular section between the first tool joint and the second tool joint, wherein the tubular section comprises a wall with an overall thickness comprising a nominal thickness and a secondary thickness, wherein the secondary thickness is outer to the nominal thickness and is configured to abrade against a wall of the wellbore, thereby reducing the secondary thickness and maintaining the nominal thickness, wherein an ID of each tool joint is less than an ID of the tubular section to accommodate for threaded connectors.
In an embodiment, a drill pipe comprises a first tool joint; a second tool joint; and a tubular section between the first tool joint and the second tool joint, wherein the tubular section comprises a wall with an overall thickness comprising a nominal thickness and a secondary thickness, wherein the secondary thickness is outer to the nominal thickness, wherein the tubular section does not contain mid-tube welds, wherein a weight per length of the drill pipe is less than a weight per length of a heavy weight drill pipe having a similar outer diameter to that of the drill pipe.
In an embodiment, a method for preventing a reduction in a nominal thickness of a drill pipe, comprises positioning a drill pipe in a wellbore, wherein a wall of the drill pipe comprises an overall thickness comprising a nominal thickness and a secondary thickness, wherein the secondary thickness is outer to the nominal thickness; manipulating the drill pipe in the wellbore, causing the drill pipe's outer surface to contact a wall of the wellbore; reducing the secondary thickness due to abrasive forces between the wall of the wellbore and the drill pipe; and maintaining the nominal thickness.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
The present subject matter will now be described with reference to the attached figures. Various structures and methods are schematically depicted in the figures for purposes of explanation only and so as to not obscure the present disclosure with details that are well known to those skilled in the art. Nevertheless, the attached figures are included to describe and explain illustrative examples of the present disclosure. The words and phrases used herein should be understood and interpreted to have a meaning consistent with the understanding of those words and phrases by those skilled in the relevant art. To the extent that a term or phrase is intended to have a special meaning, i.e., a meaning other than that understood by skilled artisans, such a special definition will be expressly set forth in the specification in a definitional manner that directly and unequivocally provides the special definition for the term or phrase.
In the following detailed description, various details may be set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various exemplary embodiments disclosed herein. However, it will be clear to one skilled in the art that some illustrative embodiments may be practiced without some of the various disclosed details. Furthermore, features and/or processes that are well-known in the art may not be described in full detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the disclosed subject matter.
In horizontal or high angle (e.g., wellbore includes portions deviating from a vertical direction by 45° to 90°) drilling/downhole operations, the drill pipe is rotated or dragged against a wellbore wall. This causes the drill pipe to be abraded by the subterranean formation, causing the drill pipe wall thickness to be reduced. This reduction in drill pipe wall thickness reduces the tensile and torsional capacity of the drill pipe which causes the drill pipe to be downgraded or removed from service. In highly aggressive drilling operations or highly abrasive formations, this significantly reduces the useable life of the drill pipe, and results in high operational costs for the drilling contractor due to the need to replace the worn drill pipe.
The present disclosure relates generally to drill pipe including a wall with an increased thickness (i.e., an increased outer diameter (“OD”)), when compared to standard drill pipe with a nominal thickness. This increased thickness of the wall of the drill pipe described herein (i.e., the wall of the tube or main body/section of the drill pipe) may act as a sacrificial wear area. The thickness of the tube may be increased without reducing the inner diameter (“ID”) of the tube (e.g., a reduced ID restricts fluid flow through the drill pipe) or creating mid-tube welds (e.g., welding a larger OD, heavier walled section at mid-tube; mid-tube welds may increase the risk of failure of the drill pipe because the welds may not be able to withstand various forces (e.g., pressure and/or temperature) that may be encountered during drilling). The ID of the drill pipe disclosed herein is equal to or substantially equal to the ID of standard drill pipe (i.e., ID of the tube). Table 1 includes examples of nominal specifications/dimensions for different sized standard (i.e., conventional) drill pipes.
Drill pipe 100 at each OD listed above in Table 2, has a weight per foot that is less than the corresponding weight/per foot for HWDP at the same OD, as listed above in Table 2. Because drill pipe 100 weighs less than a heavy weight drill pipe, there is no need for higher lifting capacities (e.g., drawworks configured to lift heavier weight), as opposed to HWDP which requires higher lifting capacities. Also, the lower weight of drill pipe 100 reduces drag in the wellbore during drilling/downhole operations, thereby causing components of a drilling rig (e.g., top drive, drawworks) to expend less energy to rotate the drill pipe and/or trip the drill pipe, as opposed to HWDP.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the embodiments may be modified and practiced in different manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope of the present disclosure.
This application claims benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/809,300 filed Feb. 22, 2019, and entitled “Wear Resistant Drill Pipe,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US20/18042 | 2/13/2020 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62809300 | Feb 2019 | US |