This disclosure relates to wearable electronics.
In recent years, the use of cellular phones, music players, video players, video games, computers, and other hand-held electronic products has greatly increased. Because these devices are hand-held, some of those electronic devices, such as computers, are often carried by the user in a separate case. There have been attempts to create wearable electronics such as music players integrated into the frames of eyewear, eyewear radio devices, and wearable computers. However, due to a disconnection between electronic products and the biological aspects of the human body, conventional devices have failed to provide a useful wearable electronic apparatus that adequately interacts with the human body and which fits anatomically and physiologically with the body while allowing full interaction of senses including vision.
This disclosure provides an electronic device, comprising a housing and headphones. The housing includes a headphone receiver. The housing is secured to a user in a location that is transversely offset a spaced distance from a central axis of the user. The headphones include a connector configured to attach to the headphone receiver, a first ear bud attached to the connector by a first wire, and a second ear bud attached to the connector by a second wire, the first wire configured to have a first length, and the second wire configured to have a second length, and the ratio of the first length to the second length is at least 1.25:1.
Advantages and features of the embodiments of this disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments when viewed in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Applicant recognized that currently available configurations of wearable electronics lacked sufficient ergonomic compatibility with the human body to have the wearable electronics feel as though they were an integral portion of a wearer's body, or would not affect the ability of a wearer to perform a variety of daily activities, including exercising. Furthermore, Applicant recognized that it would be desirable to provide electronic devices and electronic functions which are hands-free and can be worn on the surface of the body in a biologically fit manner. The embodiments of the present disclosure provide a convergence between electronic products, and biological, anatomical, and biomechanical aspects of the human body while providing hands-free and interchangeable wearable electronic apparatuses that can interact with human senses and physiology of a human body in a practical manner.
In addition, conventional “hand-held” devices require that they be held. While some cellular phones and digital players have accessories that permit the user to operate the device without having to hold it by having a second device, using such apparatus and accessories is cumbersome, and it is necessary to carry and store the accessories until they are actually used.
Moreover, hand-held devices are easily lost or misplaced, and unattended hand-held devices can be easily stolen. It would be very useful to have a non-hand-held and hands-free device that can be worn in a comfortable, non-obtrusive, and biologically-fit manner without requiring the user to carry extra devices in addition to equipment already being worn on the body. Embodiments of the present disclosure allow hand-held devices to become hands-free devices and to be worn on the body.
The risk of exposure to radiation may be a serious problem with wearable electronics. For example, cell phones and other computing and communication devices all emit radio frequency (RF) energy. RF energy is a form of electromagnetic radiation that can pose cancer risk to the user. Cellular phones' main source of RF energy is produced through the antenna, and most phones are held close to the side of the head when the in use. The closer the antenna is to the head, the greater a person's expected exposure to RF energy.
RF energy produced by cell phones may affect the brain and other tissues in the head because hand-held cell phones are usually held close to the head. Researchers have focused on whether RF energy can cause malignant brain tumors. The salivary glands also may be exposed to RF energy from cell phones held close to the head, and cancer of salivary glands has been associated with cell phone use.
An alternative to hand-held devices are Bluetooth® headsets. However, Bluetooth® headsets also emit RF energy. While many earpiece devices emit lower levels of radiation than cell phones, the earpiece does put the source of power closer to the brain. Therefore, Bluetooth® headsets can cause the same problems as hand-held cellular phones. Besides, the cell phone itself continues to emit radiation locally and then through the body to reach the Bluetooth headset in the head, increasing exposure to radiation.
It is an object of the present disclosure to provide a wearable holder that houses an electronic device and avoid or minimize exposure to radiation.
The present disclosure teaches a convergence between electronic products and the anatomical, and biomechanical aspects of the human body while providing a series of hands free wearable electronic apparatuses that can interact with human senses.
The present disclosure provides a fully compact system when not in use, and which allows full interaction of the device with vision, hearing, speech, and tactile function while being used.
It is yet another object of the present disclosure to provide hands-free support structure for housing electronics.
These and other objects of the present disclosure, as well as many of the intended advantages thereof, will become more readily apparent when reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In describing an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology will be used for the sake of clarity. However, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the specific terms so selected, and it should be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents which operate in similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
The present disclosure teaches methods and devices that allow a plurality of hand held devices to be hands free and radiation free by eliminating or reducing radiation being emitted to radiation sensitive parts of the body as the head and ear canal. The present disclosure provides a support structure referred to herein as a holder. An electronic device, such as a cell phone is housed in the holder and is removably attached to the holder. The connection between the electronic device and the holder includes an extendable cord, most preferably a spool with retractable wires, or a coiled wire capable of elongation and with spring capabilities. The electronic device is releasably connected to an electrical connection in the holder. Specially manufactured ear buds are also removably attached to the holder. It should also be understood that communication between the electronic device, holder, and ear phone may be wired or wireless.
Other features, benefits, and advantages of the present disclosure will appear from the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As described herein, headphones are frequently used with various embodiments of the present disclosure.
While the lengths of longer and shorter sides 854 and 856 are most optimized with a ratio of lengths in a specific range of lengths. The ratio of longer to shorter lengths in an exemplary embodiment is 5:2 when the length of longer side 854 is approximately 50 cm and the length of shorter side 856 is approximately 20 cm. However, the ratio can range from about 1.25:1 to about 3:1, depending on the length of each side. It should be noted that as the lengths of the wires increases, the ratio decreases. The lengths of the earphones are designed to eliminate excess length when used with the holder of the present invention housing a cellular phone with ear phone, which makes the earphones less obtrusive, convenient, and safer for the user. Additionally, headphones 852 reduce the chance of tangles as the user moves and helps avoid radiation from an associated electronic device, such as holder 858.
When the holder is used in the middle of the body, at the level of the heart and lower part of the sternum, as shown in
In the exemplary embodiment of
Headrest 932 is chosen as an illustration and not a limitation to the scope of the present disclosure. Flexible elongated arms 924 can grasp or hang from many structures because of the flexibility of arms 924 and the ability of arms 924 to retain the desired shape and position. Elongated arms can include a series of configurations and materials, and by way of example, telescopic arms, gooseneck arms, C-clamp arms, and the like and may include a variety of pressure mechanisms and springs for anchoring holder to an article of manufacturing such as chair head rest.
While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described, it should be understood that these embodiments are not limited thereto. The embodiments may be changed, modified, and further applied by those skilled in the art. Therefore, these embodiments are not limited to the detail shown and described previously, but also include all such changes and modifications.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/149,416, filed May 9, 2016, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/594,118, filed Jan. 10, 2015, claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/926,156, filed on Jan. 10, 2014 and 61/942,877, filed on Feb. 21, 2014, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2249572 | Lieber | Jul 1941 | A |
3528734 | Bruel et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
4456797 | Olsen | Jun 1984 | A |
4902120 | Weyer | Feb 1990 | A |
4942617 | Boylan | Jul 1990 | A |
5034995 | Ciccone | Jul 1991 | A |
5164987 | Raven | Nov 1992 | A |
5422957 | Cummins | Jun 1995 | A |
5608808 | Da Silva | Mar 1997 | A |
5715323 | Walker | Feb 1998 | A |
5737436 | Boyden | Apr 1998 | A |
5881160 | Sheppard | Mar 1999 | A |
6095820 | Luxon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097822 | Min | Aug 2000 | A |
6176576 | Green et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6633770 | Gitzinger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643528 | Shim et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6690808 | Urwyler | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6834820 | Wei | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6915934 | Hassett | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920228 | Redmer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
D533539 | Mah | Dec 2006 | S |
7519192 | Laycock et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7702122 | Crutcher | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8561863 | Lacolla et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573458 | Hamilton | Nov 2013 | B1 |
20010035242 | Hughs et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020072387 | Kao | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020193151 | Edreich | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036414 | Huang | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040285 | Whitley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030042348 | Salentine et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030108217 | Tilbury et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030182003 | Takashima | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040077382 | Verity | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040156012 | Jannard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178970 | El Sayed et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204165 | Huang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050011920 | Feng | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050078274 | Howell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050128431 | Jannard et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050201585 | Jannard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220316 | Hsiang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248717 | Howell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255883 | Hood | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255898 | Huang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011687 | Wadley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013410 | Wurtz | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023158 | Howell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060093178 | Chen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153409 | Yeh | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177086 | Rye et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185062 | Peng et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060251283 | Yeh | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070064969 | Chou | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070215663 | Chongson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080143954 | Abreu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156606 | Entner | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090175482 | Crutcher | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110203954 | Kroupa | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120074006 | Monaco et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120264492 | Stewart | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120328144 | Dugger et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130083456 | Koenig et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130265702 | Merenda | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20160198838 | Abreu | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1049310 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2320990 | Jul 1998 | GB |
S52-107638 | Aug 1977 | JP |
S58-113913 | Jul 1983 | JP |
H07-209600 | Nov 1985 | JP |
S61-125081 | Aug 1986 | JP |
H63-120585 | May 1988 | JP |
H01-129988 | Sep 1989 | JP |
H06-081194 | Nov 1994 | JP |
H06-81194 | Nov 1994 | JP |
H07-312791 | Nov 1995 | JP |
H08-237349 | Sep 1996 | JP |
3043585 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2002-515197 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-238092 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-278670 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-505718 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2009-527134 | Jul 2009 | JP |
200106298 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0111917 | Feb 2001 | WO |
02086599 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005115048 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007081745 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English translation of a Notification of Reasons for Rejection; issued by the Japanese Patent Office dated Feb. 13, 2012, which corresponds to Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-549558. |
A Patent Examination Report No. 2; issued by the Australian Government, IP Australia dated Aug. 7, 2014, which corresponds to Australian Patent Application No. 2013201164. |
An Office Action issued by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Jun. 7, 2010, which corresponds to Canadian Patent Application No. 2,636,159. |
A Third Office Action issued by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Apr. 10, 2013, which corresponds to Canadian Patent Application No. 2,636,159. |
A Second Office Action issued by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated May 16, 2012, which corresponds to Canadian Patent Application No. 2,636,159. |
A “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued by the European Patent Office dated Nov. 19, 2012, which corresponds to European Patent Application No. 07 717 926.5-2217. |
A Patent Examination Report No. 2; issued by the Australian Government, IP Australia dated Jun. 28, 2012, which corresponds to Australian Patent Application No. 2007205168. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2007/000177; dated Feb. 20, 2008. |
An English translation of an Office Action; “Notification of Reasons for Rejection,” issued by the Japanese Patent Office dated May 11, 2015; which corresponds to Japanese Patent Application 2013-162822. |
An Office Action; “Notification of Reasons for Rejection,” issued by the Japanese Patent Office dated May 12, 2014, which corresponds to Japanese Patent Application 2008-549558. |
A “Decision to Grant,” issued by the Japanese Patent Office dated Apr. 13, 2015; which corresponds to Japanese Patent Application 2008-549558. |
International Search Report; PCT/US2015/010937; dated May 6, 2015. |
A First Examination Report issued by the Indian Patent Office dated Aug. 28, 2015, which corresponds to Indian Patent Application No. 14070/CHENP/2008 and is related to U.S. Appl. No. 15/149,416. |
English translation of Notification of Reason for Refusal; issued by the Japanese Patent Office dated May 11, 2015, which corresponds to Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-162822. |
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding EP applicaiton No. 15734915.0 dated Nov. 3, 2017; 12pp. |
An Examination Report mailed by the Australian Patent Office dated May 23, 2018, which corresponds to Australian Patent Application No. 2017200974. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180010736 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61942877 | Feb 2014 | US | |
61926156 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15149416 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15660353 | US | |
Parent | 14594118 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15149416 | US |