1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to computing hardware and sensor arrays which are suitable for affixation to the human body. More specifically, the invention relates to sensors and computing apparatus which are adapted to detect certain human physiological data along with environmental data and transmit such data, and which are affixed to the human body in such a manner so as not to interfere with normal body flexibility or movement.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Monitoring of human physiological status data has received a high and growing level of interest in a number of medical, industrial, scientific and recreational disciplines. In certain circumstances where static data is sufficient for determining the status of a particular aspect of the human body, particularized monitoring sensors are applied to the appropriate portion of the body and data is collected for a short period of time. In these types of applications, the human subject may be in a static position, such as when blood pressure is measured, or actively engaged in movement, such as during a cardiac stress test. In either instance, a sensor is temporarily affixed to the body, either through a restraining device, friction or an adhesive material.
In the many applications, however, monitoring is limited to these short periods of time by limitations associated with the monitoring devices and the sensors themselves. Monitoring human physiological data on an extended, real-time basis presents many advantages to scientific researchers, medical professionals and individuals with a high level of interest in their own physiological condition.
A number of devices have been disclosed which attempt to enhance the portability and reduce the invasiveness of physiological sensors and the monitoring apparatus associated therewith. Furthermore, considerable development has been made in the reduction in size of computing devices and other electronic apparatus for use in close association with the human body.
Bornn, U.S. Pat. No. 5,353,793, issued Oct. 11, 1994, discloses a stretchable harness-like apparatus which enables physiological parameters of a patient to be measured while he or she is ambulatory or stationary. What is disclosed is a harness which encircles the torso and chest area of a patient. A series of circumferential straps are placed around the torso area with elongated shoulder supports supporting the circumferential bands from front to back over the shoulders. The harness-like apparatus includes certain sensors. The apparatus is specifically directed towards maintaining mobility and comfort while maintaining accuracy of measurement. A soft, resilient material is utilized to receive and restrain the encased sensors. A major shortcoming of dynamic body monitoring is identified in the reference which describes the utilization of resilient sensor supports under tension which creates monitoring artifacts caused by the relative movement of the sensors with respect to the patient's skin. The reference also identifies the utilization of electronic transmission means for communicating the collected data to external monitoring equipment. The Bornn device utilizes a uniform modulus of elasticity in the restraining bands which are selected of a material having such modulus of elasticity close to that of skin to maintain the sensors in a uniform position.
Janik, U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,398, issued Feb. 8, 1994, discloses a flexible, wearable computer, in the form of a belt, comprising a combination of microprocessor memory modules, power supply, signal relaying circuits, and a flexible, non-stretchable member with a protective covering device. In contrast to the Bomm reference, this device is intended to provide an entire wearable computer apparatus which is comfortable for the user to wear affixed to his or her body. The device incorporates a series of electrical apparatus divided into a plurality of small modules which are electrically connected along a non-resilient belt.
Kese, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,198, issued Mar. 16, 1999, discloses a portable radio which has its components distributed about a user's body, utilizing the body as a vehicle to carry the radio. This portable communication device was developed to overcome drawbacks associated with conventional portable radios through the distribution of the radio components and weight on a user's body in a more uniform manner.
Carroll, U.S. Pat. No. 5,555,490, issued Sep. 10, 1996, discloses a wearable support and interconnection structure for a modular micro computer system having a plurality of micro computer cards housed in a plurality of pockets linked by flexible circuitry and connectors within wearable garment. The reference discloses a vest-like apparatus having a series of electronic modules distributed thereacross. The garment is intended to be portable and lightweight while maintaining a level of functionality to allow the wearer to simultaneously operate the computer while engaged in a mobile activity.
Newman, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,244, issued Apr. 19, 1994, discloses a compact, self-contained portable computing apparatus which is completely supported by a user for hands-free retrieval and display of information for the user. The reference discloses a series of electronic components mounted upon a belt which is worn by the user together with a miniature video display device positioned proximate to the user's eye. A microphone is utilized to allow the user to execute commands without the utilization of his or her hands.
A significant shortcoming of the prior art devices, however, is that while they provide a lightweight and mobile computing or monitoring platform, they nevertheless severely restrict the flexibility and motion of the user. None of the prior art references disclose a specific location or series of locations proximate to the human body which would minimize or eliminate the interference of the body-mounted computer or sensor mechanism with normal or athletic bodily function and flexibility.
What is lacking in the art, therefore, is a sensor array and computing apparatus which is wearable on the human body in such a manner and placement that the user's motion and flexibility are not compromised.
An apparatus is disclosed which is adapted to specifically provide the ability to mount both sensors and computing apparatus on the human body while maintaining said sensors and apparatus within a proximity zone of the body such that the mobility and flexibility of the body are not deleteriously affected by the presence of the apparatus. The device is primarily comprised of a series of pads having rigid and flexible sections within which the sensors and computing apparatus may be housed. These pods are typically comprised of a rigid material having a minimum hardness or rigidity mounted in conjunction with certain more flexible sections to allow relative movement of the rigid material sections with respect to each other. The flexible material is further utilized to conform said rigid sections to certain pre-specified portions of the human body although it is to be specifically noted that under certain circumstances, the entire pod embodiment can be constructed of the flexible material. The pods are particularly sized and shaped to minimize interference with human motion and flexibility, and are mounted in certain distinct, pre-selected locations on the human body corresponding to the pre-specified shapes. It is to be specifically noted that each of the shapes disclosed herein comprises a maximum size and shape for each particular location. In any specific application, the minimization of the size and shape of any sensor or computing apparatus together with its rigid housing would be considered desirable to minimize interference with human flexion and motion.
The size, shape and location of each of the pod housings are specifically directed to not only certain locations of minimum interference when mounted upon the human body, but also for the specific intention of mounting sensors therein for the detection of certain human physiological status data. It is specifically contemplated that within at least one of the pod locations there will be mounted at least one specific sensor for contact with or proximate location near the human body for detection of physiological status data including but not limited to, temperature, galvanic skin response, pulse, blood pressure, respiration, activity, and certain electrical currents associated with electrocardiogram and electroencephalograph measurements.
The system is specifically intended to permit the mounting of one or more sensor devices, as well as electronic computing apparatus, to permit the dynamic monitoring of human physiological status data without substantial interference in human motion and flexibility. The systems are directed towards use in both medical care and scientific research. It is also contemplated that the system might be applied for the evaluation of human fitness, conditioning and the further development of ubiquitous, sympathetic and pervasive wearable computing apparatus. It is specifically intended that the sensors be placed within the specified locations defined by both a location determined by medical and scientific knowledge and the availability of a sensor pod defined according to the specification herein.
In a first embodiment of the system as a whole, one or more sensors are placed within the various pod locations as defined herein. A processor is mounted within the same pod location or an adjacent pod location, or said processor may be electrically connected to said sensor through a flexible material. Memory and storage means may also be provided as necessary to facilitate the processing function. Data from one or more sensors is acquired and processed according to pre-selected algorithms well known to those skilled in the art. It is specifically contemplated that this processing function may be performed by a processing means contained within the pods mounted upon the human body or by external monitoring hardware and software, as will be described herein. The first embodiment, as described, would process said data onboard the human body and transmit that data in a processed state to an external monitor through certain wire-based or wireless technologies as are well known to those skilled in the art. Such wireless technologies would include radio frequency, infrared transmission, audio and magnetic induction. It is specifically contemplated that said wireless technologies would include both open channel radio frequency transmission as well as transmissions which utilize telecommunications technologies, such as wireless telephoning and paging systems. In this first embodiment, there is optionally provided a graphical, visual, audible, tactile or haptic output means so that certain data might be displayed or otherwise communicated instantaneously to the wearer in the form of a numerical output or a series of indicator lights.
In a second embodiment, human physiological status data is merely compiled within the apparatus mounted upon the human body and is transmitted, in an unprocessed state, to an external monitoring means. In this embodiment, no onboard output or display means is contemplated.
It is further specifically contemplated that the system, as described herein, forms a subset of a larger human physiological status data recording and reporting system for which the material described herein forms the data acquisition and reporting segment. The rigid and flexible pods described herein are defined by a proximate space adjacent the human body at certain predefined locations where interaction with human motion and flexibility are minimized. The wearability of the sensor and hardware apparatus is specifically defined as the interaction between the human body and the wearable objects. The wearable pods described herein comprise three-dimensional spaces on the body best suited for comfortable and unobtrusive wearability by design. The requirements of wearability further defines the use of the human body as a support environment for the various products and sensors that will be mounted thereupon. It is intended that these wearable forms be universally applicable to a high percentage of the wearing population. While it would be considered impossible to design a set of standard forms which would be applicable to 100% of the male and female population, given the wide disparity of the sample set, the specific design of the forms disclosed is intended to apply from the fifth to the ninety-fifth percentile of the population.
There are thirteen primary factors which define the design of the wearable products. These are:
1. Placement;
2. Definition of the shape of the object;
3. The dynamic structure of the object relating to human movement in proximity thereto;
4. Human perception of the space proximate to the body;
5. Sizing as applied to the target group of body sizes;
6. Attachment means to the body;
7. Containment of objects within the defined space;
8. Weight;
9. Accessibility to human interaction;
10. Sensory interaction with the body;
11. Thermal interaction with the body;
12. Aesthetics;
13. Long-term effects on usability and wearability.
The criteria used for determining the placement of the forms on the human body are:
1. Areas that have relatively small size variance across adults;
2. Areas that have low movement and flexibility, even when the body is in motion; and
3. Areas that maximize available surface area or minimize surface irregularities.
The general areas determined to be the most unobtrusive are the cranial area, collar area, the tricep area, the forearm area, the rib cage area, the waist and hip area, the thigh area, the shin area and the top of the foot area.
With respect to the form of the various proximity spaces in the containment pods placed therein, a core concept includes forming a concavity on the inside surface of the material to accept a generally convex exterior surface of the human body. Exterior surfaces of the pods are generally convex to deflect objects and avoid bumps and snags. Furthermore, tapering and radiusing of the sides, edges and corners creates safe, soft and stable forms. In certain circumstances, chamfering and scalloping of surfaces are utilized to minimize specific interaction with proximate body parts or physical objects and facilitate extended contact upon motion.
Human movement provides a significant constraint in terms of the placement and shaping of the forms defined herein. Defining the shapes with respect to these movements can be accomplished in one of two ways: (1) by designing around the more active areas of the joints, or (2) by creating spaces, such as the aforementioned chamfering or scalloping, into which certain body parts can move.
It is well known to those skilled in the art that the brain perceives an aura or proximate space around the body that should be considered the intimate space that is perceptually considered part of the body by the brain. This is generally considered to be between 0″ and 5″ from the majority of the body space. The particular challenge in defining the containment forms is the variability of size, weight, and muscle mass of human physique. Certain static anthropometric data is utilized to achieve near universal application of forms which are comprised of rigid and flexible sections. Flexible areas are generally utilized to join certain solid forms or extend exterior to the solid forms in wing-like protrusions. These wing-like protrusions may also incorporate a transition to attachment means for temporarily affixing the sensors and other apparatus to the body. It is specifically contemplated that in many applications, wrapping the form around the body, rather than using single point fastening systems such as clips or shoulder straps, is preferred. While not specifically disclosed, attachment systems are required for utility, which must accommodate various physical sizes and shapes designed for size variations. This is typically obtained in two ways: the first being adjustability, such as straps with buckles; the second is through the use of standardized sizing systems. The latter has been adopted in the preferred embodiment design to the extent that the rigid pods are generally standardized. In each embodiment, conventional resilient fabrics may be utilized to affix the pods to the body. Alternatively, and preferably, the pods may be incorporated into a garment.
These and other objectives, features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawings.
All drawings identified herein are labeled for directionality and physical reference as applied to the human body itself. E.g., references to “right” refer to the right-hand side of the wearer.
With respect to all of the Figures illustrating the pods and pod sets, all major dimensions and arcuate sections are defined in inches. Minor and transitional arc sections are considered to be within the ambit of knowledge and skill of those skilled in the art for construction purposes. All the rigid form edges illustrated have radii of at least ⅛″ and are variable up to ¾″. Chamfers, scallops and bevels are at least 3□ but are variable and can sweep to 50□ in certain circumstances as described herein. Pods identified with the letter “A” are mirror equivalents of the unmarked reference numerals. All rigid forms are of a minimum of 100 D durometer of hardness and may be comprised of any material. In the event that the pods are intended for the support of sensor or related electronic material, it is preferable that the pods be comprised of an insulating material. Flexible sections are preferably comprised of 75-96 D material, if one or either sides of the material are scored to facilitate bendability. If no surface treatment is used, the flexible materials are preferably comprised of 30-75 D material. Flexible areas are preferably also stretchable, in the range of 14-16 ounces of tension for displacement of one-sixteenth inch to 3 inches.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is to be specifically noted that the pods of any of the embodiments described herein as discreet constructions may be joined by flexible material in a variety of combinations and subcombinations. For example, the collar, tricep and rib cage embodiments might be joined into a unitary, flexible garment, such as a shirt, having the appropriate resiliency and modulus of elasticity as described herein.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In operation, at least one sensor is mounted within the pod member. The precise location of the sensor is wholly dependent upon the nature of the human physiological status data which is to be collected. Certain sensors require direct contact with the skin, while others require only mounting in a location proximate to the body surface. The appropriate pod location is determined from physiological data which is well within the knowledge of those skilled in the art of human physiological data acquisition.
Referring now to
As applied to the human body, a sensor would be mounted within a pod and intended to detect a certain physiological or environmental status. The sensor would electronically emit an electrical signal which would be passed to the processor according to conventional methodology. The processor, if designed for onboard processing, would track the various data points detected by the sensor and store this data in memory, preferably in the form of a database. In this manner, all data from the various sensors mounted to the body could be correlated in terms of time and location. This data could then be interpreted by onboard software to detect certain changes or thresholds of physical activity or condition. This information could be stored for batch retrieval at certain times, or transmitted in a continuous, real-time stream of data. The processing means 905, in one embodiment, construct certain graphical, numerical or electronic output data which would be passed to the output means 912. Output means 912 is intended to range from a simple LED indicator light to a graphical display, which might be incorporated in a pod or worn as a watch, for example. Other methodologies of feedback to the user include auditory, tactile and haptic indicators or alarms, which would signal the passage of the sensor data through a preset threshold. It is specifically intended that more than one output means may be utilized simultaneously.
Transmitter 910 is adapted to take the output data from processor 905 and transmit the same to a monitoring facility 914. This may occur in the event that the user receives direct output or not. Certain embodiments may also utilize only rudimentary data acquisition and capturing facilities within the processor 905 and pass this raw data to transmitter 910 for processing within monitoring facility 914. In either event, monitoring facility 914 is comprised of a receiving means 916, a processing means 918 and an output means 920. These are assembled according to methodologies well known to those skilled in the art, and may be incorporated within the functionality of a personal computer. This would also enable the data to be further transmitted by computer transmission 922 to any external data storage or output source through telecommunication or other network data sharing modalities.
The terms and expressions which have been employed here are used as terms of description and not as limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portion thereof, it being recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed.
Although particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described in the foregoing detailed description, it is to be further understood that the present invention is not to be limited to just the embodiments disclosed, but that they are capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/313,255 filed Dec. 6, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,262), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/419,600 filed Oct. 18, 1999, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,711.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3870034 | James | Mar 1975 | A |
| 4031365 | Raggiotti et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4052979 | Scherr et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4129125 | Lester et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4148304 | Mull | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4151831 | Lester | May 1979 | A |
| 4192000 | Lipsey | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4312358 | Barney et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4364398 | Sassi et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4377171 | Wada | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4407295 | Steuer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4488558 | Simbruner et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4509531 | Ward | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4531527 | Reinhold, Jr. et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4539994 | Baumbach et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4557273 | Stoller et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4608987 | Mills | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4622979 | Katchis et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4672977 | Kroll | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4676254 | Frohn | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4757453 | Nasiff | Jul 1988 | A |
| RE32758 | Zartman | Oct 1988 | E |
| 4784162 | Ricks et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4803625 | Fu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4819860 | Hargrove et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4827943 | Bornn et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4828257 | Dyer et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4883063 | Bernard et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4891756 | Williams, III | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4917108 | Mault | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4958645 | Cadell et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4966154 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4981139 | Pfohl | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5007427 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012411 | Policastro | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5027824 | Dougherty et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5038792 | Mault | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040541 | Poppendiek | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5050612 | Matsumura | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5072458 | Suzuki | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5111818 | Suzuki et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5135311 | Alpert | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5148002 | Kuo et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5178155 | Mault | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5179958 | Mault | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5216599 | Uebe et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224479 | Sekine | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5263491 | Thornton | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5285398 | Janik | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5305244 | Newman et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5335664 | Nagashima | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5353793 | Bornn | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5410471 | Alyfuku et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5435315 | McPhee et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5445149 | Rotolo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5458123 | Unger | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5469861 | Piscopo et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474090 | Begun et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476103 | Nahsner | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484389 | Stark et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5491651 | Janik | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5507288 | Bocker et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511553 | Segalowitz | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5515858 | Myllymaki | May 1996 | A |
| 5515865 | Scanlon | May 1996 | A |
| 5523730 | Van Zeeland | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5524618 | Pottgen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5555490 | Carroll | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555618 | Winkler | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559497 | Hong | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5564429 | Bornn et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5566679 | Herriott | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5581238 | Chang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5581492 | Janik | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5583758 | McIlroy et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5611085 | Rasmussen | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617477 | Boyden | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5622180 | Tammi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5632057 | Lyden | May 1997 | A |
| 5645068 | Mezack et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652570 | Lepkofker | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5663703 | Pearlman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5666096 | Van Zeeland et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670944 | Myllymaki | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5673691 | Abrams et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5673692 | Schulze et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5676688 | Jaker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686516 | Tzur | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5687734 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5697791 | Nashner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704350 | Williams, III | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719743 | Jenkins et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724025 | Tavori | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726631 | Lin | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729203 | Oka et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730140 | Fitch | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5738104 | Lo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741217 | Gero | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5752976 | Duffin et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5771001 | Cobb | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778882 | Raymond et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5798907 | Janik | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5803915 | Kremenchugsky et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813766 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813994 | Pottgen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5823975 | Stark et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827180 | Goodman | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828943 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832296 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832448 | Brown | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836300 | Mault | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839901 | Karkanen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853005 | Scanlon | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855550 | Lai et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5857939 | Kaufman | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5857967 | Frid et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5862803 | Besson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865733 | Malinouskas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868669 | Iliff | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868671 | Mahoney | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871451 | Unger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876350 | Lo et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879163 | Brown et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879309 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884198 | Kese et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888172 | Andrus et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897493 | Brown | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899855 | Brown | May 1999 | A |
| 5902250 | Verrier et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5908396 | Hayakawa et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912865 | Ortega | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913310 | Brown | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5919141 | Money et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929782 | Stark et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5931791 | Saltzstein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5933136 | Bronw | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941837 | Amano et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951300 | Brown | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956501 | Brown | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957854 | Besson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959529 | Kail, IV | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959611 | Smailagic et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960380 | Flentov et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960403 | Bronw | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5976083 | Richardson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989157 | Walton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990772 | Van Zeeland | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6013007 | Root et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6030342 | Amano et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032119 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6047203 | Sackner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053872 | Mohler | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059692 | Hickman | May 2000 | A |
| 6067468 | Korenman et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069552 | Van Zeeland | May 2000 | A |
| 6091973 | Colla et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095949 | Arai | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101407 | Groezinger | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101478 | Brown | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6135107 | Mault | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6138079 | Putnam | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139494 | Cairnes | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6154668 | Pedersen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6168563 | Brown | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184797 | Stark et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198394 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208900 | Ecker et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6225901 | Kail, IV | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6225980 | Weiss et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6247647 | Courtney et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248065 | Brown | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251048 | Kaufman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6265978 | Atlas | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266623 | Vock et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6285897 | Kilcoyne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6285912 | Ellison et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287252 | Lugo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290646 | Cosentino et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290650 | Butterfield et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292698 | Duffin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298218 | Lowe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6302844 | Walker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6305071 | Van Zeeland | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306088 | Krausman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312363 | Watterson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6315719 | Rode et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332874 | Eliasen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336900 | Alleckson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339720 | Anzellini et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6341229 | Akiva | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6354990 | Juneau et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364834 | Reuss et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6366871 | Geva | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368287 | Hadas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6371123 | Stark et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377162 | Delestienne et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385473 | Haines et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6392515 | Van Zeeland et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6416471 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420959 | Lizzi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6450922 | Henderson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450953 | Place et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454708 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466232 | Newell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468222 | Mault et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478736 | Mault | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6494829 | New, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6504590 | Kikuchi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6513532 | Mault et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6516289 | David | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6527711 | Stivoric et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532381 | Bayer et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6533731 | Pottgen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6539336 | Vock et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6547745 | Rubinstein | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6551251 | Zuckerwar et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553251 | Lahdesmaki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558320 | Causey et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569094 | Suzuki et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6571200 | Mault | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6584344 | Hannula | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6595929 | Stivoric et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6597944 | Hadas | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602191 | Quy | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6605038 | Teller et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6607484 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610012 | Mault | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6635015 | Sagel | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6656125 | Misczynski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6665559 | Rowlandson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6690959 | Thompson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6712615 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6734802 | Halleck et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6755795 | Marmaropoulos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6790178 | Mault et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6808473 | Hisano et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6842877 | Robarts et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6852085 | Rubinstein | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6874127 | Newell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6886978 | Tokita et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6920348 | Vasin et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6923324 | Kanai et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6942615 | Suzuki | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6959259 | Vock et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6968375 | Brown | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 7073129 | Robarts et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7092846 | Vock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7167743 | Heruth et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171331 | Vock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 20010029340 | Mault et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032059 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044581 | Mault | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049470 | Mault et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056229 | Cosentino et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020019296 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020019586 | Teller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026164 | Camarero Roy et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020027164 | Mault et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028995 | Mault | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032386 | Sackner et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107450 | Ogura | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109600 | Mault et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111539 | Cosentino et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128804 | Geva | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133378 | Mault et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030055460 | Owen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069510 | Semler | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083559 | Thompson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088160 | Halleck | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176797 | Anzellini | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20050032457 | Gick | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070778 | Lackey | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226310 | Nakazawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060031102 | Teller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122474 | Teller et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173370 | Koivumaa et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070100666 | Stivoric et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| PI0001075-8 | Nov 2001 | BR |
| 19832361 | Feb 2000 | DE |
| 199117766 | Sep 2000 | DE |
| 0670064 | Sep 1995 | EP |
| 0707825 | Apr 1996 | EP |
| 0880936 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0880936 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 2203250 | Oct 1988 | GB |
| 2322952 | Sep 1998 | GB |
| 09-056705 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 10118052 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10295651 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 10305016 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 10305072 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 200083935 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| WO-9301574 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO-9425841 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| 9525946 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| 9525946 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO-9706499 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| 9859227 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-9927483 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| 9944494 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO-0011578 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO-0026882 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO-0032098 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO-0047108 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO-0051543 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO-0052604 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| 0101093 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO-0108554 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO-0126535 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0126547 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0128416 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0128495 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0139089 | May 2001 | WO |
| 01041645 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0152718 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-0156454 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0182783 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-0182789 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-0189365 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-0189368 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-02069798 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO0293272 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-2005046433 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ram, Sunita et al., “The People Sensor: A Mobility Aid for the Visually Impaired”, IEEE, (1998),166-167. |
| Thomas, Karen A., “Comparability of Infant Abdominal Skin and Axillary Temperatures”, NBIN 3(4):173-178. 2003, http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/465900,(2003), 7 pages. |
| “CoolPoly, the Original Thermally Conductive Polymer”, [www.coolpolymers.com], (Feb. 2001). |
| “CYBeR-CARE Internet Healthcare Technologies”, BW Health Wire, (Oct. 7, 1999). |
| “Estee Soft New Version of LifeConnect”, Business Wire, (Jan. 20, 1999). |
| “FDA Clears Datex-Ohmeda Pulse Oximeter”, BW Health Wire, (Dec. 3, 1998). |
| “Industrial Micro-Foil Heat Flux Sensor”, RdF Corporation Datasheet No. HFS-B, (Oct. 1995). |
| “Industrial/Commercial Micro-Foil Heat Flux Sensor”, RdF Corporation Catalog No. HFS-C, (Dec. 1999). |
| “Jenny Craig Weight Loss Programs”, [www.jennycraig.com], (2004). |
| “Lightweight Ambulatory Physiological Monitoring System”, Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA. |
| “Matsushita Home Health Check System”, The Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Dec. 17, 1998. |
| “Micro-Foil Heat Flux Sensors”, Rfd Corporation Datasheet No. HFS-A, (Oct. 1995). |
| “Nearer to the Heart”, Brianna Krebs Washington Post, (Jan. 17, 1999). |
| “Personal Health Monitor for Homes”, Timo Tuomisto & Vesa Pentikainen, ERCIM News, 29, (Apr. 1997). |
| “Polar M91ti Heart Rate Monitor User's Manual”, M91ticov. USA, (Nov. 13, 2000),33 pages. |
| “Polar USA—Product Detail—M91ti”, www.polarusa.com, (Oct. 4, 2002), 1 page. |
| “Polar USA—Product Detail—S-610”, www.polarusa.com. (Oct. 4, 2002),1 page. |
| “Portable Sensor Provides Remote monitoring of Heart”, Nikkei Weekly, (Oct. 27, 1998). |
| “Smart T-Shirt”, Georgia Institute of Technology Press Release, Georgia Tech.,(Nov. 14, 1997). |
| “The Complete Nutrition & Weight Management Solution Based on Your Unique metabolic Fingerprint & Goals”, FitDav [www.fitday.com], (2004). |
| “THERM-A-GAP”, Chomerics Technical Bulletin, 70, Feb. 6, 2001. |
| “Timex—Speed and Distance System”, [http://www.timex.com/spd/indexENTER.html], (Oct. 4, 2002),4 pages. |
| “Warfighter Physiological Status Monitoring”, MOMRP Fact Sheet No. 6, USAMRMC, www.momrp.org,(1999). |
| “Weight Watchers TurnAround”, [www.weightwatchers.com], (2004). |
| “What is FitDay?”, [www.fitday.com], (2004). |
| Henshaw, D , “The H.J. Andrews Climatological Field Measurement program”, www.fsl.orst.edu, (Aug. 9, 1997). |
| Katz, Jim , “Once Again, Timex, Revolutionizes the Sportwatch”, [http:www.timex.com/spd/pressrelease.html], Oct. 4, 2002 ,3 pages. |
| Rennie, K. , et al., “A Combined Heart Rate and Movement Sensor: Proof of Concept and Preliminary Testing Study”, (2000). |
| Young, Kent , “Thermal Gap Fillers”,[www.chomerics.com], Feb. 6, 2001. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070038038 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10313255 | Dec 2002 | US |
| Child | 11481147 | US | |
| Parent | 09419600 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 10313255 | US |