The present disclosure relates generally to the field of weather display systems. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a weather display system and method configured to display weather which is obscured by path attenuation.
Weather display systems are often used to alert operators of vehicles, such as aircraft pilots, of weather hazards in the area near the vehicle. Conventional weather display systems are configured to display weather data in two dimensions and often operate according to ARINC 453 and 708 standards. A horizontal plan view provides an overview of weather patterns near an aircraft mapped onto a horizontal plane. Generally the horizontal plan view provides indications of precipitation rates in the vicinity of the aircraft (images of weather). Red, yellow, and green colors are used to symbolize areas of respective precipitation rates, and black color symbolizes areas of very little or no precipitation. Each color is associated with radar reflectivity range which corresponds to a respective precipitation rate range. Red indicates the highest rates of precipitation while green represents the lowest (non-zero) rates of precipitation. Certain displays can also utilize a magenta color to indicate regions of turbulence.
Onboard avionic weather radar systems (e.g., x-band weather radar systems) cannot always penetrate or sense areas beyond intense precipitation or rainfall. Accordingly, cells (e.g. storms) behind a nearby line of cells may be shadowed by the closer cells. This shadowing by the closer cells can deprive the pilot of a view of the complete weather situation through which the aircraft is flying. Conventional avionic weather radar systems such as the WX2100 weather radar manufactured by Rockwell Collins, Inc. can execute a path attenuation compensation (PAC) algorithm that flags any radial where the radar return is too badly attenuated to be corrected. Path attenuation is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,775 incorporated herein by reference
Conventional displays can mark such radials with a yellow bar and/or provide the text “PAC Alert” so that the pilot can be aware that hidden weather may be behind displayed weather cells. However, such systems do not provide an indication of whether or not weather actually exists behind the weather cell or what type of weather exists behind a weather cell.
Thus, there is a need for a weather information display that provides more information than a conventional display. Further, there is a need for a threat depiction system and method that can augment the display of information when weather detection is obscured by path attenuation. Further still, there is a need for an avionic weather system including a path attenuation algorithm that provides an indication of weather beyond the attenuating cell. Yet further, there is a need for a system and method that displays weather despite path attenuation issues. Yet further, there is a need for a weather display that can display weather images using merged data from two different sources.
An exemplary embodiment relates to a method of displaying images associated with weather near an aircraft. The method includes sensing a path attenuation condition using the radar returns and displaying the images of the weather using an outside source and the radar returns. The images of the weather are displayed using information from the outside source when the path attenuation condition is sensed.
Another exemplary embodiment relates to an avionic weather radar system. The avionic weather radar system includes a processor configured to sense a path attenuation condition using radar returns received via a radar antenna onboard the aircraft. The processor is also configured to cause images of weather to be displayed using outside source and the radar returns. The weather is displayed using information from the outside source when the path attenuation condition is sensed.
According to certain embodiments outside sources can be another weather radar source or data from the onboard weather radar system operating at a different frequency. In other embodiments, the outside source can be a non-radar airborne source, a light detection and r ranging (LIDAR) source, an infrared source (e.g., infrared sensor/camera), etc.).
Another embodiment relates to a method of displaying images associated with weather near an aircraft. The method includes receiving radar returns associated with a radar antenna of the aircraft, and receiving data from a source remote from the aircraft. The method also includes displaying the images associated with the weather using at least a first color, a second color and a third color associated with a respective first precipitation rate or threat range, a respective second precipitation rate or threat range, and a respective third precipitation rate range or threat level. The first precipitation rate range or threat level is less than the second precipitation rate range or threat level and the third precipitation rate range or threat level is more than the second precipitation rate range or threat level. The images associated with the weather include at least a first image provided using the radar returns and a second image provided using the data from the source remote from the aircraft. The second image is provided at a range greater than a range of a path attenuation condition.
Another embodiment relates to a system comprising an electronic processor configured to provide the images of weather on a display according to any of the methods described above. Another embodiment relates to one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media having instructions stored thereon that are executable by one or more processors to execute one or more of the methods described above.
The disclosure will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
Before turning to the figures, which illustrate the exemplary embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the application is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the description or illustrated in the figures. It should also be understood that the terminology is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting. As discussed below, the systems and methods can be utilized in a number of display devices for various types of applications or sensing systems.
Referring generally to the figures, systems and methods for providing visual representations of weather in proximity to an aircraft or other vehicle are provided. According to one embodiment, weather images are displayed even when sensing the weather is blocked by path attenuation condition. For example, an embodiment of the system and method described herein can advantageously display blocked cells using a source of weather data or information remote from the aircraft. The blocked cells can advantageously be depicted using display formats compatible with ARINC 453, and ARINC 661 avionic display platforms. The display of blocked cells advantageously gives pilots a more complete view of weather conditions.
In one embodiment, the images are displayable on at least one of navigation (NAV) displays, primary flight displays, electronic flight bag displays, tablets such as iPad® computers manufactured by Apple, Inc. or tablet computers, synthetic vision system displays, head up displays (HUDs), wearable displays, Google glasses, etc. In addition, the on-board sensed weather data and remote weather data can be synchronized before merging the data for display, according to one embodiment.
Referring generally to
Referring specifically to
Weather image module 212 may be used to create a spatially correct weather interpretation (e.g., weather images) that may be displayed in the range, altitude, and/or time domains. A combination of horizontal and selected vertical antenna beams may facilitate the collection of radar return data (IQ data) that can be used to compute parameters to construct an accurate weather model. The weather model may be altitude-based, and an estimate of the reflectivity based on radar returns may be obtained for any scan angle, range, and altitude combination. Weather image module 212 may store the altitude-based weather model in a memory 206, and the weather model may be used to extract weather information in a defined manner (e.g., based on user actions). Weather image module 212 can use data from remote source 152 and data from onboard the aircraft associated with radar returns received by radar antenna 104.
Avionics weather radar system 200 includes a weather radar receiver/transmitter 102, weather radar adjustable antenna 104, a processor 208, and a memory 206 (e.g., a multi-scan, multi-tilt angle memory) in one embodiment. System 200 also includes a tilt control 203 for automatically controlling the tilt angle (mechanical or electronic) of the antenna 104 in one embodiment; this auto control may include an additional manual control feature as well.
Memory 206 may be capable of storing in a readily addressable and rapidly retrievable manner at least two data sets resulting from two or more antenna sweeps at different angles. Memory 206 can include any type of machine-readable storage device capable of storing radar returns or associated data for analysis/processing by processor 208. In some embodiments, memory 206 can store parameters of a weather model. The data in memory 206 can represent factors for a mathematical relationship defining reflectivity as a function of altitude in one embodiment. The data in memory 206 can be used by path attenuation module 214 to determine whether a path attenuation condition exists. Although a multi-scan, multi-tilt scanning and data sets are described, it should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that a single scan of data may also be used in some embodiments.
Memory 206 can also be a three dimensional storage buffer for storing weather radar parameters according to X, Y and Z coordinates according to one embodiment. The storage of radar data and the form of the weather data stored therein is not disclosed in a limiting fashion. A variety of storage techniques for weather data can be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
Weather data from returns received by antenna 104 and weather data from remote source 152 can be stored in memory 206. The weather data can be based on received horizontal and/or vertical scans and from other aircraft or ground based sources. The weather data from remote source 152 can be received using a communications unit 153, such as a radio or other wireless communication device.
In some embodiments, the data may be stored as a mathematical equation representation of the information. The mathematical equation representation may be a piecewise linear function, piecewise nonlinear function, coefficients of a cubic spline, coefficients of a polynomial function, etc. that represent vertical representations of the weather based on the horizontal scan data and/or horizontal representation of the weather based on the vertical scan data. The function may be an equation based on weather parameters that may be sensor driven, model driven, a merger of sensor and model, etc. Although horizontal scan data is described, alternative embodiments may include X, Y Cartesian coordinates, rho/theta input, latitude and longitude coordinates, altitude, etc. Weather may be estimated for any required point in space with the vertical dimension being the subject of the weather equation.
Display 110 can be part of an avionic multi-function display (MFD) unit in one embodiment. In some embodiments, display 110 may be any of a variety of display types, such as a navigation display, an electronic flight bag, a tablet computing device, a synthetic vision system, a heads up display (HUD), a dedicated weather display, or another type of display system. In some embodiments, display 110 may be a remote display not included within a cockpit of the aircraft, such as a ground-based support display or remote display configured to display information regarding whether near an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).
Processor 208 may be included as part of a multi-scan, multi-tilt angle weather radar system and may perform the customary functions performed by a conventional weather radar return processing unit. Processor 208 may also perform several additional operations based upon the additional data and/or instructions provided in memory 206. In general, processor 208 can merge or cross qualify portions, or ranges, of the radar returns of several different antenna sweeps at several different tilt angles, so that a single, relatively clutter-free image may be presented to the pilot based upon the several separate scans. The radar returns may be processed by processor 208 to generate a three-dimensional weather profile of the weather near the aircraft.
System 200 may perform a scanning operation by transmitting at least two beams at different tilt angles. In some embodiments, system 200 may use a global positioning system (GPS), terrain database, or other tool to control the tilt control 203. Data obtained from the radar returns (e.g., reflectivity data) may be stored in memory 206. For example, known ground clutter may be removed from each of the returns using ground clutter suppression techniques.
Referring again to
Some embodiments may use more complex curve fits. Specific curve fits can be utilized depending on geographical location, time of day, time of year, etc. For example, over Europe, a linear curve fit may suffice to determine vertical reflectivity between freezing layer and troposphere height whereas a second order fit may be required over the equatorial Pacific. A tag can be given to each cell denoting the specific order of the data fit and, correspondingly, the method used to obtain vertical data from the stored parameters. As additional data is collected, perhaps through dedicated vertical scans of convective cells, the functions can be updated or increased in complexity in order to improve their accuracy.
Processor 208 may process weather radar returns to identify or sense the presence of weather in front of or in view of the aircraft. Weather image module 212 may utilize the altitude and the range to the weather to generate a vertical profile associated with the weather. Weather merge module 212 may scan across an array of azimuths to generate a three-dimensional weather profile of the weather near the aircraft, which may be stored for later presentation or immediately presented on display 110. Weather images can be displayed on either view screen 111 or 113 or both screen 111 and 113. Screens 111 and 113 plan view only displays in one embodiment. Although vertical profiles are discussed herein, system 200 includes embodiments that do not use vertical profile processing and/or that do not display vertical profiles.
In some embodiments, additional visual indicators other than the representation of weather are provided on screens 111 or 113. In some embodiments, a range and bearing matrix having range markers indicating distance from a current position of the aircraft and bearing markers indicating azimuths from a current flight path or bearing of the aircraft may be provided and may assist the pilot in cognitive recognition of weather features from the pilot's perspective.
With reference to
Path attenuation module 214 receives weather radar returns associated with antenna 104 and determines whether a path attenuation condition exists. Module 214 can employ an algorithm similar to the algorithms employed in the RTA-4218 MULTISCAN™ radar system to determine whether X-band weather radar returns are experiencing a path attenuation condition. These algorithms generally determine whether returns beyond a range associated with large reflections have been too badly attenuated for compensation. If so, the path attenuation condition warning is provided.
In one embodiment, the path attenuation condition can be sensed when expected returns (e.g., noise returns) fall off rapidly. The path attenuation condition can be sensed on a radial basis. Alternatively, weather data from remote source 152 can be compared to weather data from radar returns received by radar antenna 104 to determine if a path attenuation conditions exists. For example, if there is a cell or storm at a particular range in a particular azimuth range according to remote data and the weather radar returns do not show any storms or cell beyond that particular range in the particular azimuth range, then path attenuation module 214 can determine that a path attenuation condition exists. Module 214 may consider whether a storm is in front of the missing storm from the remote data. Temporal correlation can be necessary in certain embodiments as returns received by antenna 104 generally provide more current data than weather data received via communications unit. In one embodiment, data from source 152 includes storm vector information, and the locations of the cells are adjusted with respect to time using the storm vector information.
If a path attenuation condition exists, weather image module 212 can utilize weather data from remote source 152 and radar returns to provide a screen 111 using weather data from a remote source. If a path condition does not exist, weather image module 214 can provide a screen 113 that provides images only using weather data derived from radar returns received on antenna 104. Screen 111 can include both images derived from weather data from remote source 152 and weather data derived from returns received an antenna 104. The images derived from weather data from remote source 152 and weather data derived from returns can be spatially correlated using time of sensing information and storm vector values. The storm vector values can be from a Nowcast or forecast weather data source such as the Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) or Consolidated Storm Prediction for Aviation (COSPA) weather data source in one embodiment. Along with storm vector information, growth and decay information can be received, which may be used to increase or decrease the size, shape, and intensity of the weather data displayed in accordance with time in one embodiment.
Weather data stored in memory 206 can include weather data from remote source 152 (
In one embodiment, if a path attenuation condition exists, weather image module 212 can utilize weather data from another aircraft or other onboard weather sources and radar returns associated with antenna 104 to provide a screen 111. The weather data can be from another weather radar source or data from the onboard weather radar system operating at a different frequency. The different frequency can be a millimeter frequency, a Ka band, frequency, a W band frequency etc. In other embodiments, the weather data can be from a non-radar airborne source (a LIDAR source, an infrared source, etc.).
With reference to
At a step 145, path attenuation module 214 determines if a path attenuation condition exists in one embodiment. At a step 146, if a path attenuation condition exists, weather data from remote source 152 are adjusted for spatial and temporal correlation in accordance with one embodiment. At a step 148, the weather data from remote source 152 and weather data derived from radar returns from antenna 104 are merged in one embodiment. At a step 150, weather images are generated using the merged data in one embodiment.
If a path condition does not exist at step 145, weather images can be generated at step 150 using only return data from radar returns received by radar antenna 104 in one embodiment. In one embodiment, a path attenuation factor can be utilized to select weather data for merging. The weather data from source 152 can be merged with the radar return data to create weather images in one embodiment. For example, if the attenuation factor indicates substantial attenuation at a particular azimuth and range, weather images can be provided using a greater percentage of data form source 152 at that range in one embodiment. If the attenuation factor indicates a complete path attenuation condition, then the data from source 152 is entirely used to provide the image at that range and azimuth in one embodiment. Further, data can be merged in accordance with its temporal standing. More recent data is given preference over older data in one embodiment. In one embodiment, images are provided using data from source 152 at ranges beyond a threshold range, and images are provided using data from radar returns received by antenna 104 at ranges below the threshold range.
Processor 208 and weather image module 212 cause display 110 to display areas associated with weather data from remote source 152 differently than weather images derived from radar returns from antenna 104 in one embodiment. Weather images using data from remote source 152 can be displayed using outlines, cross-hatching, uniformly organized speckles, etc. The outlines, cross-hatching and speckles can have red, yellow, or green color according to standard precipitation rates in one embodiment. In one embodiment, the cross-hatched regions are provided with a background color corresponding to the precipitation rate and a line color for the cross hatching differs from the background color.
The speckled pattern or cross hatched regions can either be bounded (e.g., outlined) or unbounded and can have a variety of shape profiles including rounded or straight edges in one embodiment. The speckles can vary in shape and size to represent age of data in one embodiment. The cross hatching can also vary in thickness to represent age of data in one embodiment. According to another embodiment, boundary color can be the same or different as the speckled colors. According to another embodiment processor 208 and weather image module 212 cause display 110 to display areas associated with weather data from remote source 152 as outlined regions without cross hatching and speckles in one embodiment.
In some embodiments, process 140 may be implemented using instructions stored on a machine-readable medium (e.g., memory 206) and executed on a processor (e.g., processor 208). Processor 208 may be configured to operate system 200 as a pulse Doppler multi-scan, multi-tilt angle radar system or a volumetric radar system in which radar beams are produced at more than one tilt angle. Processor 208 receives radar returns through receiver/transmitter circuit 102.
Processor 208 can receive the radar returns (or signals/data related thereto) directly or through memory 206 at a step 142. Receiver/transmitter circuit 102 can be a single path or can have separate circuits for a receive path and a transmit path. Processor 208 may determine power associated with the radar returns.
With reference to
A PAC alert is provided on screen 400 as a bar 412 as well as a textual message 414 stating the term “PAC ALERT”. Bar 412 indicates the radials through which the path attenuation condition exists and is provided on a range arc 416 with azimuth indications. Accordingly, the pilot is aware that additional storms may exist beyond the range of weather images 402. Since bar 412 is not provided behind weather images 405 which are displayed in a similar fashion to weather images 402, the pilot knows that weather does not exist beyond the range of weather images 405.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Screen 700 can also include a PAC Alert message 704 and/or a bar 706 indicating the radials affected by the path attenuation condition according to one embodiment. Bar 706 can be yellow or another appropriate color. Bar 706 can be provided on the outer most range arc in one embodiment. Message 704 and bar 706 can also be used on screens 500 and 600 according to one embodiment.
With reference to
Weather images 802 correspond to images 502 and are configured to indicate that weather images 802 are derived from data from remote source 152 according to one embodiment. Weather images 402, 405 and 407 are displayed as on screens 400 and 500 as in
Weather images 822 are derived from data from source 152. In one embodiment, system 200 uses data from source 152 at greater ranges because weather is best sensed via radar antenna 104 at shorter ranges (e.g., 60 nm, 80 nm, and 100 nm) in one embodiment. In another embodiment, system 200 uses data from source 152 for areas outside the azimuth capabilities of antenna 104. Data from returns received by antenna 104 are updated much more rapidly than outside sources like NEXRAD sources. Weather images 822 can be derived from data from outside source 152 at greater ranges because the relevant weather can be sampled more accurately via antenna 104 as the aircraft comes closer to it as the aircraft travels along flight path 824. The locations of weather images 822 can be adjusted in accordance with time and vector parameters in one embodiment. Screen 800 can also include a PAC Alert message 704 and/or a bar 706 indicating the radials affected by the path attenuation condition on marker 820 according to one embodiment. Weather image module 212 can merge the weather data from source 152 with the radar return data associated with antenna 104 by using a threshold range or greater to choose the weather data from source 152 and choosing the weather data from source 152 when a path attenuation condition exists to create screen 800 in one embodiment. In one embodiment, a zone around marker 828 can define an area where merged data is used to provide weather images. In one embodiment, the merged data includes radar return data and data from source 152, each weighted according to its range from the aircraft where radar return data is more heavily weighted the closer it is to the aircraft. The weather images in the merged data area can be configured similar to images 502, 602, 702, or 802. In one embodiment, weather images 822 can be depicted at a lower brightness, luminance or intensity level or similar to images 502, 602, 702, or 802 to indicate they are derived from data from outside source 152. In one embodiment, the brightness, luminance or intensity level is varied to represent the age of data associated with images 822.
The disclosure is described above with reference to drawings. These drawings illustrate certain details of specific embodiments that implement the systems and methods and programs of the present disclosure. However, describing the disclosure with drawings should not be construed as imposing on the disclosure any limitations that may be present in the drawings. The present disclosure contemplates methods, systems and program products on any machine-readable media for accomplishing its operations. The embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented using an existing computer processor, or by a special purpose computer processor incorporated for this or another purpose or by a hardwired system. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for.” Furthermore, no element, component or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public, regardless of whether the element, component or method step is explicitly recited in the claims.
As noted above, embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure include program products comprising machine-readable storage media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such machine-readable storage media can be any available media which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, such machine-readable storage media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium (e.g., non-transitory medium) which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable storage media. Machine-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machine to perform a certain function or group of functions.
Embodiments of the disclosure are described in the general context of method steps which may be implemented in one embodiment by a program product including machine-executable instructions, such as program code, for example, in the form of program modules executed by machines in networked environments. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Machine-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of program code for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represent examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers having processors. Logical connections may include a local area network (LAN) and a wide area network (WAN) that are presented here by way of example and not limitation. Such networking environments are commonplace in office-wide or enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet and may use a wide variety of different communication protocols. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that such network computing environments will typically encompass many types of computer system configurations, including personal computers, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, servers, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Embodiments of the disclosure may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by local and remote processing devices that are linked (either by hardwired links, wireless links, or by a combination of hardwired or wireless links) through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
An exemplary system for implementing the overall system or portions of the disclosure might include a general purpose computing device in the form of a computer, including a processing unit, a system memory, and a system bus that couples various system components including the system memory to the processing unit. The system memory may include read only memory (ROM) and random access memory (RAM) or other non-transitory storage medium. The computer may also include a magnetic hard disk drive for reading from and writing to a magnetic hard disk, a magnetic disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable magnetic disk, and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk such as a CD ROM or other optical media. The drives and their associated machine-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of machine-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data for the computer.
It should be noted that although the flowcharts provided herein show a specific order of method steps, it is understood that the order of these steps may differ from what is depicted. Also two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence. Such variation will depend on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. It is understood that all such variations are within the scope of the disclosure. Likewise, software and web implementations of the present disclosure could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule based logic and other logic to accomplish the various database searching steps, correlation steps, comparison steps and decision steps. It should also be noted that the word “component” as used herein and in the claims is intended to encompass implementations using one or more lines of software code, and/or hardware implementations, and/or equipment for receiving manual inputs.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the disclosure. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principals of the disclosure and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the disclosure in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 9,599,707, filed Jan. 23, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
650275 | Reeve | May 1900 | A |
3251057 | Buehler et al. | May 1966 | A |
3359557 | Fow et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3404396 | Buchler et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3465339 | Marner | Sep 1969 | A |
3491358 | Hicks et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3508259 | Andrews | Apr 1970 | A |
3540829 | Collinson et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3567915 | Altshuler et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3646555 | Atlas | Feb 1972 | A |
3715748 | Hicks | Feb 1973 | A |
3764719 | Dell | Oct 1973 | A |
3781530 | Britland et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3781878 | Kirkpatrick | Dec 1973 | A |
3803609 | Lewis et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3885237 | Kirkpatrick | May 1975 | A |
3943511 | Evans et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3964064 | Brandao et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3968490 | Gostin | Jul 1976 | A |
4015257 | Fetter | Mar 1977 | A |
4043194 | Tanner | Aug 1977 | A |
4179693 | Evans et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4223309 | Payne | Sep 1980 | A |
4240108 | Levy | Dec 1980 | A |
4283715 | Choisnet | Aug 1981 | A |
4283725 | Chisholm | Aug 1981 | A |
4318100 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4346595 | Frosch et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4430654 | Kupfer | Feb 1984 | A |
4435707 | Clark | Mar 1984 | A |
4459592 | Long | Jul 1984 | A |
4533915 | Lucchi et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4555703 | Cantrell | Nov 1985 | A |
4600925 | Alitz et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613938 | Hansen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4649388 | Atlas | Mar 1987 | A |
4658255 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4684950 | Long | Aug 1987 | A |
4742353 | D'Addio et al. | May 1988 | A |
4761650 | Masuda et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4835536 | Piesinger et al. | May 1989 | A |
RE33152 | Atlas | Jan 1990 | E |
4914444 | Pifer et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4928131 | Onozawa | May 1990 | A |
4940987 | Frederick | Jul 1990 | A |
5036334 | Henderson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047775 | Alitz | Sep 1991 | A |
5049886 | Seitz et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057820 | Markson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077558 | Kuntman | Dec 1991 | A |
5105191 | Keedy | Apr 1992 | A |
5159407 | Churnside et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164731 | Borden et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5173704 | Buehler et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177487 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5198819 | Susnjara | Mar 1993 | A |
5202690 | Frederick | Apr 1993 | A |
5208600 | Rubin | May 1993 | A |
5221924 | Wilson, Jr. | Jun 1993 | A |
5262773 | Gordon | Nov 1993 | A |
5291208 | Young | Mar 1994 | A |
5296865 | Lewis | Mar 1994 | A |
5311183 | Mathews et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311184 | Kuntman | May 1994 | A |
5331330 | Susnjara | Jul 1994 | A |
5396220 | Markson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402116 | Ashley | Mar 1995 | A |
5469168 | Anderson | Nov 1995 | A |
5479173 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485157 | Long | Jan 1996 | A |
5517193 | Allison et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521603 | Young | May 1996 | A |
5534868 | Gjessing et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5568151 | Merritt | Oct 1996 | A |
5583972 | Miller | Dec 1996 | A |
5592171 | Jordan | Jan 1997 | A |
5602543 | Prata et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615118 | Frank | Mar 1997 | A |
5648782 | Albo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654700 | Prata et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657009 | Gordon | Aug 1997 | A |
5686919 | Jordan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5726656 | Frankot | Mar 1998 | A |
5757322 | Ray et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771020 | Markson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5828332 | Frederick | Oct 1998 | A |
5838239 | Stern et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839080 | Muller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5907568 | Reitan, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
5920276 | Frederick | Jul 1999 | A |
5945926 | Ammar et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973635 | Albo | Oct 1999 | A |
6034760 | Rees | Mar 2000 | A |
6043756 | Bateman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043757 | Patrick | Mar 2000 | A |
6081220 | Fujisaka et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6138060 | Conner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154151 | McElreath et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154169 | Kuntman | Nov 2000 | A |
6177873 | Cragun | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184816 | Zheng et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201494 | Kronfeld | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208284 | Woodell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236351 | Conner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240369 | Foust | May 2001 | B1 |
6246367 | Markson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6281832 | McElreath | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289277 | Feyereisen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297772 | Lewis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339747 | Daly et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340946 | Wolfson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381538 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384830 | Baron et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6388607 | Woodell | May 2002 | B1 |
6388608 | Woodell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
RE37725 | Yamada | Jun 2002 | E |
6405134 | Smith et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424288 | Woodell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441773 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456226 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480142 | Rubin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496252 | Whiteley | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501392 | Gremmert et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6512476 | Woodell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518914 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549161 | Woodell | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560538 | Schwinn et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563452 | Zheng et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577947 | Kronfeld et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590520 | Steele et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597305 | Szeto et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603425 | Woodell | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606564 | Schwinn et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614382 | Cannaday et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650275 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650972 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667710 | Cornell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670908 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677886 | Lok | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683609 | Baron et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690317 | Szeto et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703945 | Kuntman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720906 | Szeto et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738010 | Steele et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741203 | Woodell | May 2004 | B1 |
6744382 | Lapis et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771207 | Lang | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788043 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791311 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6828922 | Gremmert et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6828923 | Anderson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839018 | Szeto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850185 | Woodell | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856908 | Devarasetty et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6879280 | Bull et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882302 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6917860 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6977608 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7030805 | Ormesher et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039505 | Southard et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7042387 | Ridenour et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082382 | Rose et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7109912 | Paramore et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109913 | Paramore et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7116266 | Vesel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129885 | Woodell et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132974 | Christianson | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139664 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145503 | Abramovich et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161525 | Finley et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7200491 | Rose et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205928 | Sweet | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7242343 | Woodell | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259714 | Cataldo | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7292178 | Woodell et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7307576 | Koenigs | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307577 | Kronfeld et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307583 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307586 | Peshlov et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7307756 | Walmsley | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7352317 | Finley et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7352929 | Hagen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365674 | Tillotson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372394 | Woodell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7383131 | Wey et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7417579 | Woodell | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7427943 | Kronfeld et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7436361 | Paulsen et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7471995 | Robinson | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7486219 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7486220 | Kronfeld et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7492304 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7492305 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7515087 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7515088 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7528613 | Thompson et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7541971 | Woodell et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7557735 | Woodell et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7576680 | Woodell | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7581441 | Barny et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598901 | Tillotson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7598902 | Woodell et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7633428 | McCusker et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7633431 | Wey et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7664601 | Daly, Jr. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7696920 | Finley | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7696921 | Finley et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7698058 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7714767 | Kronfeld et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7728758 | Varadarajan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733264 | Woodell et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7859448 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7868811 | Woodell et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7869953 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7917255 | Finley | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7932853 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7973698 | Woodell et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7982658 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8022859 | Bunch et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8054214 | Bunch | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072368 | Woodell | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8081106 | Yannone | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8089391 | Woodell et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8098188 | Costes et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098189 | Woodell et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8111186 | Bunch et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8159369 | Koenigs et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8217828 | Kirk | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228227 | Bunch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8314730 | Musiak et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8332084 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8902100 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9019146 | Finley et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9134418 | Kronfeld et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9507022 | Breiholz et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9535158 | Breiholz et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9599707 | Kronfeld | Mar 2017 | B1 |
20020039072 | Gremmert et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020126039 | Dalton et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030001770 | Cornell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025627 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030193411 | Price | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040183695 | Ruokangas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040239550 | Daly, Jr. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049789 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050174350 | Ridenour | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222770 | McKewon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036366 | Kelly et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070005249 | Dupree et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080040038 | Southard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080158048 | Ridenour | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158049 | Southard et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090177343 | Bunch et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090219197 | Bunch | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100019938 | Bunch | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042275 | Kirk | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100194628 | Christianson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201565 | Khatwa | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245164 | Kauffman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245165 | Kauffman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100302093 | Bunch | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100302094 | Bunch | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328143 | Kirk | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332056 | Kirk | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110074624 | Bunch | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110148692 | Christianson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148694 | Bunch et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120029786 | Calandra et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120086596 | Insanic et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133551 | Pujol et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139778 | Bunch et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130226452 | Watts | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234884 | Bunch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130321442 | Van Os et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345982 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140156133 | Cullinane et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176362 | Sneed | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140362088 | Veillette et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 329 738 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2658617 | Aug 1991 | FR |
WO-9807047 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9822834 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-03005060 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-2009137158 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769, filed Sep. 27, 2011, Rockwell Collins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052, filed Dec. 17, 2012, Woodell et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,538, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Kronfeld et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,893, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,406, filed Jun. 17, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,844, filed Nov. 21, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035, filed Jan. 23, 2014, Kevin M. Kronfeld et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,766, filed Jul. 3, 2014, Weichbrod et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,730, filed Aug. 21, 2014, Breiholz et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,753, filed Aug. 21, 2014, Arlen E. Breiholz et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,071, filed Jan. 28, 2015, Breiholz et al. |
3-D Weather Hazard and Avoidance System, Honeywell InteVue Brochure dated Nov. 2008, 4 pages. |
Boudevillain et al., 2003, Assessment of Vertically Integrated Liquid (VIL) Water Content Radar Measurement, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 807-819. |
Bovith et al., Detecting Weather Radar Clutter by Information Fusion with Satellite Images and Numerical Weather Prediction Model Output; Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2006, 4 pages. |
Burnham et al., Thunderstorm Turbulence and Its Relationship to Weather Radar Echoes, J. Aircraft, Sep.-Oct. 1969, 8 pages. |
Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS), www.ll.mit.edu/mission/aviation/faawxsystems/ciws.html, received on Aug. 19, 2009, 3 pages. |
Decision on Appeal for Inter Parties Reexamination Control No. 95/001,860, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 17 pages. |
Doviak et al., Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, 1984, 298 pages. |
Dupree et al.,FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting in the United States National Airspace, Proceedings from the World Weather Research Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Term Forecasts, Toulouse, France, 2005, 29 pages. |
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663 dated Mar. 7, 2013, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Apr. 1, 2014, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Jan. 22, 2015, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 18 pages. |
Goodman et al., LISDAD Lightning Observations during the Feb. 22-23, 1998 Central Florida Tornado Outbreak, http:www.srh.noaa.gov/topics/attach/html/ssd98-37.htm, Jun. 1, 1998, 5 pages. |
Greene et al., Vertically Integrated Liquid Water—A New Analysis Tool, Monthly Weather Review, Jul. 1972, 5 pages. |
Hodanish, Integration of Lightning Detection Systems in a Modernized National Weather Service Office, http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/hoepub.html, retrieved on Aug. 6, 2007, 5 pages. |
Honeywell, RDR-4B Forward Looking Windshear Detection/Weather Radar System User's Manual with Radar Operation Guidelines, Jul. 2003, 106 pages. |
Keith, Transport Category Airplane Electronic Display Systems, Jul. 16, 1987, 34 pages. |
Klingle-Wilson et al., Description of Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) Weather Products, Aug. 1, 2005, 120 pages. |
Kuntman et al, Turbulence Detection and Avoidance System, Flight Safety Foundation 53rd International Air Safety Seminar (IASS), Oct. 29, 2000. |
Kuntman, Airborne System to Address Leading Cause of Injuries in Non-Fatal Airline Accidents, ICAO Journal, Mar. 2000. |
Kuntman, Satellite Imagery: Predicting Aviation Weather Hazards, ICAO Journal, Mar. 2000, 4 pps. |
Lahiff, 2005, Vertically Integrated Liquid Density and Its Associated Hail Size Range Across the Burlington, Vermont County Warning Area, Eastern Regional Technical Attachment, No. 05-01, 20 pages. |
Liu, Chuntao et al., Relationships between lightning flash rates and radar reflectivity vertical structures in thunderstorms over the tropics and subtropics, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 177, D06212, doi:10.1029/2011JDo17123,2012, American Geophysical Union, Mar. 27, 2012, 19 pages. |
Meteorological/KSC/L71557/Lighting Detection and Ranging (LDAR), Jan. 2002, 12 pages. |
Nathanson, Fred E., “Radar and Its Composite Environment,” Radar Design Principles, Signal Processing and the Environment, 1969, 5 pages, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York et al. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated May 27, 2015, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,235 dated Apr. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,901 dated Jun. 17, 2015, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663 dated May 29, 2013, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Jul. 8, 2014, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Mar. 27, 2015, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Sep. 23, 2013, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Feb. 11, 2015, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Sep. 9, 2014, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,893 dated Jun. 22, 2015, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/913,100 dated May 4, 2015, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,406 dated Jul. 14, 2015, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035 dated Jul. 11, 2016, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035, dated Feb. 4, 2016, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,766, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,753, dated Apr. 4, 2016, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,071, dated Jan. 23, 2017, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,844, dated Nov. 10, 2015, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowability on U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Aug. 4, 2014, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Jan. 8, 2015, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,438 dated Feb. 25, 2015, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035, dated Nov. 9, 2016, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,730, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,071, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,901, dated Dec. 23, 2015, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663, dated Oct. 22, 2012, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052, dated Aug. 22, 2013, 15 pages. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Jul. 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Apr. 21, 2014, 18 pages. |
Pessi et al., On the Relationship Between Lightning and Convective Rainfall Over the Central Pacific Ocean, date unknown, 9 pages. |
Robinson et al., En Route Weather Depiction Benefits of the Nexrad Vertically Integrated Liquid Water Product Utilized by the Corridor Integrated Weather System, 10th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology (ARAM), 2002, 4 pages. |
Stormscope Lightning Detection Systems, L3 Avionics Systems, retrieved on Jul. 11, 2011, 6 pages. |
TOA Technology, printed from website: http://www.toasystems.com/technology.html on Dec. 29, 2010, 2 pages. |
Triangulation, from Wikipedia, printed from website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation on Dec. 29, 2010, 6 pages. |
Waldvogel et al., The Kinetic Energy of Hailfalls. Part I: Hailstone Spectra, Journal of Applied Meteorology, Apr. 1978, 8 pages. |
Wilson et al., The Complementary Use of Titan-Derived Radar and Total Lightning Thunderstorm Cells, paper presented on Oct. 16, 2005, 10 pages. |
Zipser et al., The Vertical Profile of Radar Reflectivity and Convective Cells: A Strong Indicator of Storm Intensity and Lightning Probability? America Meteorological Society, 1994, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,942 dated Jan. 17, 2019. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,766 dated Jun. 19, 2017. 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,942 dated Oct. 6, 2017. 15 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,071 dated Dec. 15, 2017. 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,942 dated Jun. 1, 2018. 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14162035 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 15462712 | US |