Web-based system and method for providing comprehensive vehicle build information

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10977727
  • Patent Number
    10,977,727
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 28, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 13, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Auto I.D., Inc. (Nashville, TN, US)
  • Examiners
    • Winder; Patrice L
    • Widhalm De Rodrig; Angela M
    Agents
    • Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
Abstract
A hosted web-accessible system, computer program and methods are provided for generating comprehensive vehicle trim and detailed equipment information for clients, including providing comparative estimation based on underlying information regarding a particular vehicle. Comprehensive original vehicle data is obtained from vehicle manufacturers via a vehicle source interface, the data including a unique vehicle identifier for each of one or more vehicles associated with the respective source. A vehicle information request with a vehicle identifier is received from a client, and comprehensive original vehicle data is identified based on the unique identifier and the identifier from the client request. A client response interface displays vehicle data from the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data. Vehicle valuation may be obtained from third party evaluators according to the vehicle request and based on the original vehicle data.
Description

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the reproduction of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates generally to web-based systems and methods for providing and verifying vehicle information which is otherwise difficult to access or even unavailable, including providing comparative estimation based on underlying information regarding a particular vehicle. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a host system and associated methods for producing and generating detailed information about the trim and optional equipment of a vehicle based on data provided from the vehicle manufacturer and a vehicle identifier provided from a third party entity such as a lender, dealer, auction or other consumer.


Currently, a vehicle has a vehicle identification number (VIN) that may provide basic information about the vehicle that has been coded into the VIN by a corresponding manufacturer. The information provided may include for example the country of origin, manufacturer, year of manufacture, manufacturing assembly plant, make and model, etc., but often is silent regarding the trim details and any upgrades related to the vehicle. This leaves the dealer, bank, customer, auction, and other entities having to visually verify items such as trim levels, transmission, optional packages, and/or other equipment for the vehicle, which may be quite difficult or even impossible to do in some cases where the vehicle is in another location and/or without knowing exactly what to look for and being willing to spend the time to look in the appropriate places. Often manufacturers have packages such as “sport” or “convenience” and trim levels such as “touring” or “grand touring” that can equate to hundreds or thousands of dollars in added value. Often they are not designated on the vehicle and are not coded in the VIN, leaving only a select number of individuals with detailed factory knowledge able to accurately identify or verify these vehicles, resulting often in misrepresentation or errors in determining value. Such errors and/or misrepresentations can lead to added exposure, risk, liability, and lost revenue to parties involved such as lenders, dealers and auctions.


As loan approvals, loan terms, pricing and buying decisions are determined from a value of the vehicle which relies to some extent on this information, it is crucial to accurately determine a vehicle's build information, trim details and optional equipment.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A hosted web-accessible system, computer program and methods are provided in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure for accurately generating vehicle build information such as trim and detailed equipment information for clients, which is comprehensive in that it includes information which is both coded and non-coded in the VIN and further both verifiable and non-verifiable via mere visual inspection of the vehicle. Comprehensive original vehicle data is obtained from vehicle manufacturers via a vehicle source interface, the data including a unique vehicle identifier for each of one or more vehicles associated with the respective source. A vehicle information request with a vehicle identifier is received from a client via a client request interface, and comprehensive original vehicle data is identified based on the unique identifier from the source and the identifier from the client request. A client response interface is generated for the purpose of, among other things, displaying the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data.


In certain embodiments of the disclosure, a vehicle valuation is obtained from third party evaluators according to the vehicle request and based on the original vehicle data.


In further embodiments, supplemental data may be received from service providers and optionally presented as well.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram representing an embodiment of a hosted system in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a flowchart representing an embodiment of a method in accordance with the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring generally to FIGS. 1 and 2, various embodiments are described herein for a system, program product, and associated methods for providing comprehensive vehicle build data, trim and other detailed vehicle information such as optional equipment. Clients of a hosted system according to the present disclosure may obtain or otherwise view a report of verified vehicle information having been originally provided from the vehicle manufacturer, and in certain embodiments may further obtain a valuation for the vehicle as generated by a third party vehicle evaluator, and/or supplemental data from third party service providers having access to vehicle data downstream from the associated manufacturers.


Where the various figures may describe embodiments sharing various common elements and features with other embodiments, similar elements and features are given the same reference numerals and redundant description thereof may be omitted below. Throughout the specification and claims, the following terms take at least the meanings explicitly associated herein, unless the context dictates otherwise. The meanings identified below do not necessarily limit the terms, but merely provide illustrative examples for the terms. The meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” may include plural references, and the meaning of “in” may include “in” and “on.” The phrase “in one embodiment,” as used herein does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, although it may.


Terms such as “providing,” “processing,” “supplying,” “determining,” “calculating” or the like may refer at least to an action of a computer system, computer program, signal processor, logic or alternative analog or digital electronic device that may be transformative of signals represented as physical quantities, whether automatically or manually initiated.


Referring first to FIG. 1, an embodiment of a web-based system 10 according to the present disclosure may be described. The term “web-based system” as used herein may, unless otherwise stated, refer generally to a platform effective to implement web-transitory functions, whether browser-based or otherwise. In other embodiments, the host system may include other computer-based platforms such as for example peer-to-peer structures which may not be explicitly web-based.


The system 10 is embodied by or within either of a central hosted server 12 or a plurality of servers 12 functionally linked and collectively defining a distributed host network (not shown). The server 12 as represented in FIG. 1 further includes a processor 14, a computer-readable memory medium 16, a database 20 and an I/O platform 22 which may typically include one or more user interfaces generated by program instructions or modules thereof in accordance with features, methods or steps described in greater detail below.


The term “computer-readable memory medium” as used herein may refer to any non-transitory medium 16 alone or as one of a plurality of non-transitory memory media 16 within which is embodied a computer program product 18 that includes processor-executable software, instructions or program modules which upon execution may provide data or otherwise cause a computer system to implement subject matter or otherwise operate in a specific manner as further defined herein. It may further be understood that more than one type of memory media may be used in combination to conduct processor-executable software, instructions or program modules from a first memory medium upon which the software, instructions or program modules initially reside to a processor for execution.


“Memory media” as generally used herein may further include without limitation transmission media and/or storage media. “Storage media” may refer in an equivalent manner to volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media, including at least dynamic memory, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), chip memory devices, optical or magnetic disk memory devices, flash memory devices, or any other medium which may be used to stored data in a processor-accessible manner, and may unless otherwise stated either reside on a single computing platform or be distributed across a plurality of such platforms. “Transmission media” may include any tangible media effective to permit processor-executable software, instructions or program modules residing on the media to be read and executed by a processor, including without limitation wire, cable, fiber-optic and wireless media such as is known in the art.


The term “processor” as used herein may refer to at least general-purpose or specific-purpose processing devices and/or logic as may be understood by one of skill in the art, including but not limited to single- or multithreading processors, central processors, parent processors, graphical processors, media processors, and the like.


The host server 12 may be accessible by or otherwise linked to various external and third party platforms via a communications network 34 and in accordance with these links is effective to collect, obtain, receive, transmit and/or share data using various communications protocols as are well known in the art. The term “communications network” 34 as used herein with respect to data communication between two or more parties or otherwise between communications network interfaces associated with two or more parties may refer to any one of, or a combination of any two or more of, telecommunications networks (whether wired, wireless, cellular or the like), a global network such as the Internet, local networks, network links, Internet Service Providers (ISP's), and intermediate communication interfaces as are known in the art.


The term “platform” as used herein may typically refer to a website, network, or alternative but equivalent interfaces for supporting multimedia interactivity consistent with the described features of the present disclosure.


The I/O platform 22 represented in FIG. 1 may typically refer to one or more websites including a plurality of web pages, pop-ups, links and the like, or alternatively email, text, or equivalent messaging platforms, which collectively define the plurality of user interfaces further described herein. Such interfaces as may be associated with or generated by the host system in accordance with the present disclosure may include without limitation a client request interface 24, a client response interface 26, a vehicle source interface 28, a third party evaluator interface 30, and a vehicle service provider interface 32. It may be understood that the distinct interfaces as represented in FIG. 1 may be defined by or within a single website or even webpage having overlapping functionality, but this is by no means necessary within the scope of the present disclosure, and for example a “service provider” in one aspect may be a “vehicle source” or “client” in another aspect having access to the associated interfaces of the system.


A “client” as referred to herein may refer to any entity obtaining or seeking to obtain vehicle information utilizing the system and associated features of the present disclosure, including without limitation lenders, dealers, auction offices, auto evaluators, insurance agencies, automobile websites, law enforcement agencies or officers, individual consumers, etc.


A “vehicle source” may typically refer to a vehicle manufacturer but may further refer to any entity providing verifiable and comprehensive original vehicle data in accordance with the present disclosure.


“Comprehensive original vehicle data” as used throughout this description includes all vehicle data which is made available by the source and is relevant to the vehicle build data, trim, any optional detail information, vehicle valuation, etc., and generally includes information which is both coded and non-coded with respect to the vehicle identifier, and verifiable or non-verifiable by a user. Examples of such vehicle data may include standard information such as without limitation year, make and model of the vehicle. Other examples include factory information such as without limitation equipment, trim details, color, transmission details, drive train, factory packages, and factory options. Other examples include drivetrain information such as without limitation whether the vehicle is a four-wheel drive (4WD), a two-wheel drive (2WD, automatic 4WD, or all-wheel Drive (AWD). A “vehicle service provider” may typically refer to any party that provides supplemental vehicle data such as current aftermarket replacements, upgrades, and the like with respect to a vehicle. A service provider may be the manufacturer itself, or more typically may be a third party. Such third parties may in various embodiments of the present disclosure be able to provide supplemental vehicle data, but this data may typically be separated from the original data and identified as being less reliable than data from the vehicle source, and even made optional for viewing by clients of the system, as further described below.


A vehicle manufacturer may associate a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) as a unique identifier of a particular manufactured vehicle. The VIN may be coded by the manufacturer according to one or more vehicle attributes, as known in the art. For example, information such as vehicle manufacturer country, region, or world manufacturer identifier may be included. The vehicle's make, mole, engine, weight, year, manufacturing plant, or vehicle description (e.g., to identify attributes such as model, body style, engine, etc.) may be included. One or more digits may provide a vehicle identification section relating to plant and other values, such as production number. The manufacturer generates a unique VIN for a particular car based on the combination of vehicle attributes and a possible sequence number.


However, it is not possible for a vehicle manufacturer to code all vehicle attributes in the VIN. As such, to sufficiently describe or value a particular vehicle, additional information must be known. In one exemplary embodiment, a vehicle manufacturer creates non-coded vehicle information relating to one or more attributes not coded in a VIN. The non-coded vehicle information is associated with a unique vehicle in one exemplary embodiment. Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of non-coded vehicle information may relate to a plurality of vehicles sharing a common attribute, such as in the case of a non-VIN code trim package. The vehicle manufacturer may store or cause to be stored the non-coded vehicle information, and/or may convey the non-coded vehicle information to one or more external receivers, either together with the coded vehicle information, or separate from the coded vehicle information. In one exemplary embodiment, the coded and non-coded vehicle information is generated by the vehicle manufacturer at or around the time of vehicle manufacture.


Referring now to FIG. 2, an exemplary method 100 in accordance with the present disclosure may be described. It may be understood that the various steps recited herein are not limiting on the scope of the present disclosure unless otherwise stated, and that accordingly the steps are not required to be executed in the order provided or even at all unless otherwise stated or where logic dictates.


In step 102, a host server receives, collects, imports, or otherwise obtains comprehensive original vehicle data directly from a vehicle source (typically the respective manufacturer) to ensure the accuracy of the associated information. The data may be obtained periodically from the source, for example at predetermined intervals, or simply as determined by the source such as where new data has become available. Generally speaking, the vehicle data may be transmitted via the communications network to a dedicated interface (e.g., secured web page, email address, etc.) in the form of an electronic data file, but alternatively may be simply made available for collection from a database residing on a source platform by program modules operating from the host server or otherwise executed by the host system on or within the source platform.


Typically, the comprehensive original vehicle data will include or be provided in association with a unique vehicle identifier, such as for example a VIN.


The data may upon importation or collection by the host system then be stored in a database (step 104). In various embodiments, the original data may be raw data from the source which is converted by the host system into a universal format for storage in a collective database. The raw data may be obtained using a predetermined format which merely requires the host system to parse, collate, arrange, etc., the data in order to properly store it within the database. Alternatively, the host system may require the use of algorithms or equivalent programmed functions to identify or characterize the raw data prior to storage. In some embodiments, each source/manufacturer may send raw data in a unique format which is configured to facilitate population of an intended client interface that is particular to the source, such as for example including source-specific trademarks, etc.


In certain embodiments of a host system within the scope of the present disclosure, vehicle service providers such as for example authorized dealers and the like may be allowed to provide supplemental (aftermarket) data to the system via a service provider interface. Where for example a service provider has modified, upgraded or removed some component as originally provided with respect to a particular vehicle, supplemental data may be provided to the system along with the unique vehicle identifier and then stored in the database alongside the comprehensive original vehicle data. The supplemental data will typically be stored in auxiliary portions of the database and not for example over or in place of the original data.


The supplemental data may further be stored in association with a service provider identifier. The particular service provider may in an embodiment be associated by the host system with a reliability score or the equivalent, so as to indicate the likelihood that the information is correct and complete based on prior dealings and/or client comments/feedback, or as a potential reflection on the quality of the vehicle itself after having received aftermarket servicing from that particular service provider, again based on prior dealings and/or client feedback. Algorithms for scoring the service providers, or interfaces for client feedback and association thereof with the particular service providers, may be executed by the host system automatically upon receipt of supplemental data or via a trigger where for example the service provider has previously received negative feedback or otherwise scored below a threshold value.


The client-specific portion of the process or in other words that related to a specific transaction or client request begins with step 106, wherein the host system receives a vehicle information request from a client via a dedicated interface (e.g., web page, pop-up data field, email address, etc.). The request typically shall include a vehicle identifier associated with the vehicle for which information is sought, and vehicle data corresponding with the particular vehicle may thereby be identified and retrieved from the database by matching the client-provided identifier with the unique identifier stored in association with the data. The vehicle identifier may be electronically scanned at the client end and submitted to the system interface, or alternatively manually entered via keystrokes and the like, equally within the scope of the present disclosure. Where the identifier is to be electronically scanned, the client-side hardware and associated software module necessary to generate the electronic identifier from (for example) the physical bar code is not itself generally associated with the host system of the present disclosure and further description is omitted herein as redundant.


In certain embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure, the system may generate a client response interface within or upon which is displayed at least a subset of the comprehensive original vehicle data for the identified vehicle (that which is associated with the vehicle identifier provided by the client), but not valuations or supplemental data. Such an embodiment may be optimal for an auction house, automobile website, or an equivalent client entity having no need of third party evaluations of the vehicle's value, or no desire to obtain potentially unreliable supplemental data from third party service providers. However, in other embodiments as are contemplated by a method 100 as represented in FIG. 2, such features may be at least optionally provided by the system, as further described below.


Where a client has requested a vehicle valuation from the system (i.e., “yes” in response to the query in step 108), it may further be determined whether a third party book evaluator is available to provide valuation with respect to the identified vehicle (step 110). In some embodiments, this step may be redundant where the system is configured to provide all valuations internally and without the option of obtaining such valuations from an external source. In either event, where no evaluator is available or otherwise provided by the system for client selection (i.e., “no” in response to the query in step 110), the method 100 continues to step 112 and generates a vehicle valuation based on the comprehensive original vehicle data stored in the database. Program instructions or program modules which may be executed by the system to determine the value may include proprietary algorithms with respect to the host but are not so limited within the scope of the present disclosure.


In some embodiments, the system may generate or determine a first vehicle valuation based on the original data and further determine a second vehicle valuation which is based on the original data and any available supplemental data, such that either may be displayed for the client based on client selection.


Where one or more evaluators are available and provided by the system (in for example a list) for client selection (i.e., “yes” in response to the query in step 110), the method 100 continues to step 114 and receives client input data representative of third party evaluator selection or identification. The system then obtains a vehicle valuation from the one or more evaluators selected or otherwise identified by the client (step 116).


As a first example of how the vehicle valuation may be obtained by the host system, a data field may be generated which includes the comprehensive original vehicle data (and in some embodiments any supplemental data) and then transmitted to the selected one or more third party evaluators. The vehicle identifier may in some cases be provided as well, but typically the vehicle data alone will be sufficient. The evaluator may then populate the data field with any additional requested or required information, including vehicle valuation data. The vehicle valuation data may include a vehicle valuation and any other data which may be useful or available with respect to the particular evaluator, or as requested by the system. The vehicle valuation data may include for example a first vehicle valuation based on the original data and a second vehicle valuation which is based on the original data and any available supplemental data, such that either may be displayed for the client based on client selection.


In a second example, the data field is generated by the system as described above. However, rather than transmitting the data field itself to the evaluator, the system may generate and transmit a valuation request to the selected third parties via the dedicated interface (e.g., web page, email, direct download, etc.), with the request comprising at least a portion of the comprehensive original vehicle data as determined to be relevant for valuation by the particular evaluators. The system may then receive the requested vehicle valuation data from the third party in any of a number of available formats, and subsequently populates the data field with a vehicle valuation based on the received vehicle valuation data, or otherwise stores the vehicle valuation data or a valuation derived therefrom in the database.


In a third example, the data field is generated as described above and then transmitted to the one or more selected/identified third party evaluators. Rather than return the data field to the host, the evaluator may simply provide the requested vehicle valuation data via for example an email or the like. The host receives the vehicle valuation data and then populates the data field with a vehicle valuation based on the received vehicle valuation data, or otherwise stores the valuation in the database in association with the original vehicle data.


The method 100 as represented in FIG. 2 may further in step 118 include determining whether or not supplemental data is available with respect to the identified vehicle (or whether the supplemental data feature is available in a given embodiment). If supplemental data is not available (for either reason), the method may proceed to step 124, and the system generates a client response interface which includes or otherwise displays some or all of the vehicle information results. Typically, the interface will not include all of the comprehensive vehicle information (which may be quite lengthy), but rather one or more subsets of the data in accordance with a predetermined template that is populated with the respective data. One or more templates may be provided for user selection in various embodiments, or for example a list of optional data sets may be provided to the user and a template created from a subsequent user selection. The interface may be a web page or part of a mobile device application, in which the results may be pushed out by the host system via the communications network and displayed, or for example an email having text results or an embedded electronic file with the results, or various alternative and equivalent interfaces as may be known to those of skill in the art.


If supplemental data is available (i.e., “yes” in response to the query of step 118), the method proceeds to step 120 and indicates to the client the presence of supplemental data associated with the identified vehicle. The system may further indicate the service provider that was the source of the supplemental data, and where supplemental data has been provided from more than one service provider, each provider may for example be listed. If the system is programmed or configured to determine a reliability score or otherwise collect feedback regarding the various service providers, such information may be provided as well for review by the client.


In step 122, the client may then provide input to the system representative of selection or rejection of one or more of the service providers and associated supplemental data for inclusion in the final report or displayed results, wherein the method 100 proceeds to step 124 as described above.


The system may be configured to receive and compare sets of information from a plurality of sources. The system may be further configured to compare at least a portion of the sets of information to one another and/or to known correct information. A result of the comparison may be conveyed to a requesting client. As part of the comparison, a set of known information known by each of the plurality of sources may be matched against each source. The result of the comparison may include an indication of the results of the matching process, including one or more errors associated with a specific of the plurality of sources relating to known information.


A vehicle valuation process may include comparing known information to at least one of a set of common information between third parties or a set of distinguishing information between third parties. The process may include obtaining a vehicle valuation for the identified set of vehicle data from a plurality of third party evaluators via the communications network, identifying a common set of information relating to the identified set of vehicle data from each of the plurality of third party evaluators, identifying a distinguishing set of information relating to the identified set of vehicle data from each of the plurality of third party evaluators, and generating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data, the identified common set of information, and the identified distinguishing set of information.


For example, a first of three sources may erroneously identify a particular model, thereby impacting that source's estimated insurance or valuation estimate. A reader of the results would clearly recognize this difference, and at least one of a user or the system may compensate accordingly (e.g., by discrediting a source having incorrect information or by excluding that source from the results presented to a client). Additionally or alternatively, the system may recognize a source having superior vehicle information as compared to another source, and may highlight a more accurate estimate in the report.


The previous detailed description has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. Thus, although there have been described particular embodiments of the present disclosure of a new and useful “Web-Based System and Method for Providing Comprehensive Vehicle Build Information,” it is not intended that such references be construed as limitations upon the scope of this disclosure except as set forth in the following claims

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method of generating comprehensive vehicle data, the method comprising: receiving, at a hosted server, a set of comprehensive original vehicle data for each of a plurality of vehicles from one or more respective vehicle manufacturers via a vehicle source interface functionally linked to a communications network, wherein each set of comprehensive original vehicle data is associated with a respective unique vehicle identifier and includes both: standard vehicle data associated with the unique vehicle identifier, the standard vehicle data being coded by a respective vehicle manufacturer of the one or more respective vehicle manufacturers and included in the unique vehicle identifier for a respective vehicle of the plurality of vehicle identified by the unique vehicle identifier, andfactory vehicle build data associated with the unique vehicle identifier, the factory vehicle build data being non-coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer and not included in the unique vehicle identifier for the respective vehicle, wherein the factory vehicle build data comprises original raw vehicle build data which is not included within the standard vehicle data and is not coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer into the unique vehicle identifier, and wherein the factory vehicle build data is received from the respective vehicle manufacturer;storing the set of comprehensive original vehicle data for each of the plurality of vehicles in a database;receiving a vehicle information request from a client via a client request interface, the request including a received vehicle identifier;identifying a requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data stored in the database based on the received vehicle identifier from the client request;automatically generating a vehicle trim level attribute value for the respective vehicle identified by the received vehicle identifier based on applying one or more stored trim level assessment algorithms related to the make or model to original raw vehicle build data for the corresponding vehicle, wherein the trim level assessment algorithm independently analyzes details for the respective vehicle generated at a time of build for the respective vehicle without subsequent verification; andgenerating a client response interface displaying vehicle data from the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: converting the set of comprehensive original vehicle data into a universal format, wherein the database is effective to receive the original raw vehicle build data from a plurality of vehicle manufacturers having a like plurality of original data formats.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: determining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data based on one or more predetermined valuation criteria and the vehicle trim level attribute value, andgenerating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator via the communications network, andgenerating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, the step of obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator further comprising the steps of: generating a data field including the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving client input selecting the third party evaluator from a list of available third party evaluators via the client request interface;transmitting the data field to the selected third party via the communications network; andreceiving the data field from the third party further including vehicle valuation data provided by the third party.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, the step of obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator further comprising the steps of: generating a data field including the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving client input selecting the third party evaluator from a list of available third party evaluators via the client request interface;transmitting a valuation request to the selected third party via the communications network, the request comprising at least a portion of the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving vehicle valuation data from the third party; andpopulating the data field with the vehicle valuation based on the received vehicle valuation data.
  • 7. The method of claim 4, the step of obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator further comprising the steps of: generating a data field including the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving client input selecting the third party evaluator from a list of available third party evaluators via the client request interface;transmitting the data field to the selected third party via the communications network;receiving vehicle valuation data from the third party evaluator; andpopulating the data field with the vehicle valuation based on the received vehicle valuation data.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: receiving, at the hosted server, one or more sets of supplemental vehicle data from one or more vehicle service providers via a vehicle service provider interface functionally linked to the communications network, each set of supplemental vehicle data associated with a respective unique vehicle identifier;storing the supplemental vehicle data in the database in association with the comprehensive original vehicle data and with the respective vehicle service provider; andgenerating the client response interface displaying the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data and the associated supplemental vehicle data.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, the step of generating the client response interface displaying the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data and the associated supplemental vehicle data, further comprising the steps of: indicating to the client via the client response interface that supplemental vehicle data from the one or more service providers is available with respect to the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving client input via the client response interface corresponding to a selection of none, some or all of the supplemental vehicle data; andgenerating the client response interface displaying the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data and any supplemental vehicle data selected by the client in accordance with the received client input.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a plurality of third party evaluators via the communications network;identifying a common set of information relating to the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from each of the plurality of third party evaluators;identifying a distinguishing set of information relating to the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from each of the plurality of third party evaluators; andgenerating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data, the identified common set of information, and the identified distinguishing set of information.
  • 11. A hosted server system comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having program instructions residing thereon, the program instructions configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising: receiving a set of comprehensive original vehicle data for each of a plurality of vehicles from one or more respective vehicle manufacturers via a vehicle source interface functionally linked to a communications network, wherein each set of comprehensive original vehicle data is associated with a respective unique vehicle identifier and includes both: standard vehicle data associated with the unique vehicle identifier, the standard vehicle data being coded by a respective vehicle manufacturer of the one or more respective vehicle manufacturers and included in the unique vehicle identifier for a respective vehicle of the plurality of vehicle identified by the unique vehicle identifier, andfactory vehicle build data associated with the unique vehicle identifier, the factory vehicle build data being non-coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer and not included in the unique vehicle identifier for the respective vehicle, wherein the factory vehicle build data comprises original raw vehicle build data which is not included within the standard vehicle data and is not coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer into the unique vehicle identifier, and wherein the factory vehicle build data is received from the respective vehicle manufacturer;receiving a vehicle information request from a client via a client request interface, the request including a received vehicle identifier;identifying a requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data based on the received vehicle identifier from the client request;automatically generating a vehicle trim level attribute value for the respective vehicle identified by the received vehicle identifier based on applying one or more stored trim level assessment algorithms related to the make or model to original raw vehicle build data for the corresponding vehicle, wherein the trim level assessment algorithm independently analyzes details for the respective vehicle generated at a time of build for the respective vehicle without subsequent verification; andgenerating a client response interface displaying vehicle data from the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the standard vehicle data comprises one or more of a country of origin, manufacturer, year of manufacture, manufacturing assembly plant, make, and model for the respective vehicle.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the factory vehicle data comprises one or more of equipment, trim details, color, transmission details, drive train, factory packages, and factory options for the respective vehicle.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the instructions are further configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising converting the original raw vehicle build data into a universal format wherein the database is effective to receive the original raw vehicle build data from a plurality of vehicle manufacturers having a like plurality of original data formats.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the instructions are further configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising determining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data based on one or more predetermined valuation criteria, and generating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the instructions are further configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator via the communications network, and generating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the instructions are further configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator by further directing the performance of operations comprising: generating a data field including the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving client input selecting a third party evaluator from a list of available third party evaluators via the client request interface;transmitting the data field to the selected third party via the communications network; andreceiving the data field from the third party further including vehicle valuation data provided by the third party.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the instructions are further configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising obtaining a vehicle valuation for the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data from a third party evaluator by further directing the performance of operations comprising: generating a data field including the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving client input selecting a third party evaluator from a list of available third party evaluators via the client request interface;transmitting a valuation request to the selected third party via the communications network, the request comprising at least a portion of the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data;receiving vehicle valuation data from the third party; andpopulating the data field with the vehicle valuation based on the received vehicle valuation data.
  • 19. The system of claim 11, wherein the instructions are further configured upon execution by a processor to direct the performance of operations comprising: receiving at the hosted server one or more sets of supplemental vehicle data from one or more vehicle service providers via a vehicle service provider interface functionally linked to the communications network, each set of supplemental vehicle data associated with a respective unique vehicle identifier;storing the supplemental vehicle data in a data repository in association with the original data and with the respective service provider; andgenerating the client response interface displaying the requested set of comprehensive original vehicle data and the associated supplemental vehicle data.
  • 20. A computer-implemented method of generating comprehensive vehicle data, the method comprising: receiving at a hosted server a set of comprehensive original vehicle data for each of a plurality of vehicles from one or more respective vehicle manufacturers via a vehicle source interface functionally linked to a communications network, wherein each set of comprehensive original vehicle data is associated with a respective unique vehicle identifier and includes both: standard vehicle data associated with the unique vehicle identifier, the standard vehicle data being coded by a respective vehicle manufacturer of the one or more respective vehicle manufacturers and included in the unique vehicle identifier for a respective vehicle of the plurality of vehicle identified by the unique vehicle identifier, andfactory vehicle build data associated with the unique vehicle identifier, the factory vehicle build data being non-coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer and not included in the unique vehicle identifier for each of the one or more vehicles, wherein the factory vehicle build data comprises original raw vehicle build data which is not included within the standard vehicle data and is not coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer into the unique vehicle identifier, and wherein the factory vehicle build data is received from the respective vehicle manufacturer;storing the set of comprehensive original vehicle data for each of the plurality of vehicles in a database;receiving one or more sets of supplemental data, wherein the one or more sets of supplemental data relates to aftermarket vehicle data not included in the standard vehicle data coded by the respective vehicle manufacturer and not included in the factory vehicle build data which is non-coded by the vehicle manufacturer;determining a reliability score associated with a provider of the one or more sets of supplemental data;associating the reliability score associated with the provider of the one or more sets of supplemental data with the one or more sets of supplemental data;selectively including or excluding supplemental data for valuation based at least on part on the reliability score associated with the provider of the one or more sets of supplemental data; andgenerating a client response interface displaying vehicle data from the comprehensive original vehicle data, the one or more sets of supplemental data, and the reliability score associated with the provider of the one or more sets of supplemental data,automatically generating a vehicle trim level attribute value for the respective vehicle identified by the received vehicle identifier based on applying one or more stored trim level assessment algorithms related to the make or model to original raw vehicle build data for the corresponding vehicle, wherein the trim level assessment algorithm independently analyzes details for the respective vehicle generated at a time of build for the respective vehicle without subsequent verification;obtaining a vehicle valuation for the identified set of vehicle data from a third party evaluator via the communications network, andgenerating the client response interface displaying the vehicle valuation in association with the identified set of comprehensive original vehicle data.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,438, filed on Nov. 16, 2011 and titled “Web-based System and Method for Providing Comprehensive Vehicle Build Information,” which claimed benefit of and priority from: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/415,207, filed on Nov. 18, 2010, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (303)
Number Name Date Kind
4989144 Barnett, III Jan 1991 A
5120704 Lechter et al. Jun 1992 A
5201010 Deaton et al. Apr 1993 A
5216612 Cornett et al. Jun 1993 A
5488360 Ray Jan 1996 A
5532838 Barbari Jul 1996 A
5630070 Dietrich et al. May 1997 A
5748098 Grace May 1998 A
5765143 Sheldon et al. Jun 1998 A
5819234 Slavin et al. Oct 1998 A
5878403 DeFrancesco Mar 1999 A
5940812 Tengel et al. Aug 1999 A
5950169 Borghesi et al. Sep 1999 A
5963129 Warner Oct 1999 A
5995947 Fraser et al. Nov 1999 A
6006201 Berent et al. Dec 1999 A
6038554 Vig Mar 2000 A
6052065 Glover Apr 2000 A
6052068 Price R-W et al. Apr 2000 A
6076064 Rose, Jr. Jun 2000 A
6126332 Cubbage et al. Oct 2000 A
6154152 Ito Nov 2000 A
6182048 Osborn et al. Jan 2001 B1
6208979 Sinclair Mar 2001 B1
6236977 Verba et al. May 2001 B1
6278936 Jones Aug 2001 B1
6282517 Wolfe et al. Aug 2001 B1
6330499 Chou et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330546 Gopinathan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6430539 Lazarus et al. Aug 2002 B1
6516239 Madden Feb 2003 B1
6587841 DeFrancesco Jul 2003 B1
6714859 Jones Mar 2004 B2
6738748 Wetzer May 2004 B2
6754564 Newport Jun 2004 B2
6760794 Deno et al. Jul 2004 B2
6772145 Shishido Aug 2004 B2
6804606 Jones Oct 2004 B2
6839682 Blume et al. Jan 2005 B1
6904359 Jones Jun 2005 B2
6938021 Shear et al. Aug 2005 B2
6959281 Freeling et al. Oct 2005 B1
7024418 Childress Apr 2006 B1
7050982 Sheinson et al. May 2006 B2
7069118 Coletrane et al. Jun 2006 B2
7092898 Mattick et al. Aug 2006 B1
7113853 Hecklinger Sep 2006 B2
7130821 Connors et al. Oct 2006 B1
7181427 DeFrancesco Feb 2007 B1
7184974 Shishido Feb 2007 B2
7191058 Laird et al. Mar 2007 B2
7228298 Raines Jun 2007 B1
7288298 Raines Jun 2007 B2
7275083 Seibel et al. Sep 2007 B1
7366694 Lazerson Apr 2008 B2
7392203 Edison et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392221 Nabe et al. Jun 2008 B2
7421322 Silversmith et al. Sep 2008 B1
7444302 Hu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7472088 Taylor et al. Dec 2008 B2
RE40692 Rose, Jr. Mar 2009 E
7505838 Raines et al. Mar 2009 B2
7561963 Brice et al. Jul 2009 B2
7567922 Weinberg Jul 2009 B1
7571139 Giordano et al. Aug 2009 B1
7580856 Pliha Aug 2009 B1
7590589 Hoffberg Sep 2009 B2
7593893 Ladd et al. Sep 2009 B1
7596512 Raines Sep 2009 B1
7603293 Chenn Oct 2009 B2
7610257 Abrahams Oct 2009 B1
7630932 Danaher et al. Dec 2009 B2
7653592 Flaxman et al. Jan 2010 B1
7693896 Raines Apr 2010 B1
7739142 Chand et al. Jun 2010 B2
7778841 Bayer et al. Aug 2010 B1
7788147 Haggerty et al. Aug 2010 B2
7835940 Kowalchuk Nov 2010 B2
7865409 Monaghan Jan 2011 B1
7877320 Downey Jan 2011 B1
7925654 Raines Apr 2011 B1
7945478 Hogan et al. May 2011 B2
7962404 Metzger, II et al. Jun 2011 B1
7966210 Hall et al. Jun 2011 B2
7974886 Coleman Jul 2011 B2
7991689 Brunzell et al. Aug 2011 B1
8005759 Hirtenstein et al. Aug 2011 B2
8005795 Galipeau et al. Aug 2011 B2
8036952 Mohr et al. Oct 2011 B2
8055544 Ullman Nov 2011 B2
8078524 Crawford et al. Dec 2011 B2
8104671 Besecker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8121938 Zettner et al. Feb 2012 B1
8185417 Brown et al. May 2012 B1
8219464 Inghelbrecht et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239388 Raines Aug 2012 B2
8244563 Coon et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255243 Raines et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255244 Raines et al. Aug 2012 B2
8285656 Chang et al. Oct 2012 B1
8355983 Parr et al. Jan 2013 B1
8380594 Berkman et al. Feb 2013 B2
8392334 Hirtenstein et al. Mar 2013 B2
8438048 Benavides, III May 2013 B1
8438170 Koran et al. May 2013 B2
8560161 Kator et al. Oct 2013 B1
8595079 Raines et al. Nov 2013 B1
8600783 Smith et al. Dec 2013 B2
8600823 Raines et al. Dec 2013 B1
8606648 Bayer et al. Dec 2013 B1
8626560 Anderson Jan 2014 B1
8630929 Haggerty et al. Jan 2014 B2
8645193 Swinson et al. Feb 2014 B2
8725584 Eager et al. May 2014 B1
9053589 Kator et al. Jun 2015 B1
9053590 Kator et al. Jun 2015 B1
9076276 Kator et al. Jul 2015 B1
9087335 Rane et al. Jul 2015 B2
9105048 Koran et al. Aug 2015 B2
9123056 Singh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147217 Zabritski et al. Sep 2015 B1
9292860 Singh et al. Mar 2016 B2
9501781 Singh et al. Nov 2016 B2
9646308 Eager et al. May 2017 B1
9690820 Girulat, Jr. Jun 2017 B1
9697544 Bayer et al. Jul 2017 B1
9741066 Eager et al. Aug 2017 B2
10162848 Mohan et al. Dec 2018 B2
10163156 Shapley et al. Dec 2018 B1
10380654 Hirtenstein et al. Aug 2019 B2
10409867 Von Busch et al. Sep 2019 B1
10565181 Hjermstad et al. Feb 2020 B1
10580054 Cain et al. Mar 2020 B2
10581825 Poschel et al. Mar 2020 B2
20010044769 Chaves Nov 2001 A1
20020023051 Kunzle et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020042752 Chaves Apr 2002 A1
20020072964 Choi Jun 2002 A1
20020082978 Ghouri et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091706 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099628 Takaoka et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103622 Burge Aug 2002 A1
20020128960 Lambiotte et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020161496 Yamaki Oct 2002 A1
20020193925 Funkhouser et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030033242 Lynch et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041019 Vagim, III et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046179 Anabtawi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030101111 Dang et al. May 2003 A1
20030105728 Yano et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030144950 O'Brien et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030177481 Amaru et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187753 Takaoka Oct 2003 A1
20030200151 Ellenson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030216965 Libman Nov 2003 A1
20030233323 Bilski et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040034657 Zambo et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040107125 Guheen et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128262 Nafousi Jul 2004 A1
20040163101 Swix Aug 2004 A1
20040193644 Baker et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040243506 Das Dec 2004 A1
20040249532 Kelly et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010555 Gallivan Jan 2005 A1
20050021384 Pantaleo et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038580 Seim et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050113991 Rogers et al. May 2005 A1
20050177489 Neff et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050209892 Miller Sep 2005 A1
20050246256 Gastineau et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251820 Stefanik et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256780 Eldred Nov 2005 A1
20050267754 Schultz et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267774 Merritt et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004731 Seibel et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010052 Willingham Jan 2006 A1
20060015425 Brooks Jan 2006 A1
20060031182 Ryan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041443 Horvath Feb 2006 A1
20060107560 Wong May 2006 A1
20060149674 Cook et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060163868 Baumann Jul 2006 A1
20060178957 LeClaire Aug 2006 A1
20060178973 Chiovari et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060202012 Grano et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060202862 Ratnakar Sep 2006 A1
20060206416 Farias Sep 2006 A1
20060218079 Goldblatt et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229799 Nimmo et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242039 Haggerty et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242046 Haggerty et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242050 Haggerty et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060277141 Palmer Dec 2006 A1
20070011083 Bird et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027791 Young et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070059442 Sabeta Mar 2007 A1
20070136163 Bell Jun 2007 A1
20070156515 Hasselback et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162293 Malkon Jul 2007 A1
20070179798 Inbarajan Aug 2007 A1
20070179860 Romero Aug 2007 A1
20070185777 Pyle et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070192165 Haggerty et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070226131 Decker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244732 Chatterji et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250327 Hedy Oct 2007 A1
20070271178 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288271 Klinkhammer Dec 2007 A1
20070294163 Harmon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015954 Huber et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080016119 Sharma Jan 2008 A1
20080059317 Chandran et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071882 Hering et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080097663 Morimoto Apr 2008 A1
20080120155 Pliha May 2008 A1
20080126137 Kidd et al. May 2008 A1
20080177590 Brodsky et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183689 Kubota et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201163 Barker et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228635 Megdal et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235061 Innes Sep 2008 A1
20080255897 Megdal et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080294540 Celka et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294546 Flannery Nov 2008 A1
20080301188 O'Hara Dec 2008 A1
20080312969 Raines et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090018996 Hunt et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090055044 Dienst Feb 2009 A1
20090083130 Hall et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090138290 Holden May 2009 A1
20090144201 Gierkink et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187513 Noy et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090240735 Grandhi et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090271296 Romero Oct 2009 A1
20090271385 Krishnamoorthy et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287370 Iwai et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100030649 Ubelhor Feb 2010 A1
20100070343 Taira et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070382 Inghelbrecht Mar 2010 A1
20100076881 O'Grady et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100088158 Pollack Apr 2010 A1
20100094664 Bush et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100161486 Liu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100179861 Teerilahti et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198629 Wesileder et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100217616 Colson et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100223106 Hallowell et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100293089 Peterson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100293181 Muller et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299190 Pratt et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100332292 Anderson Dec 2010 A1
20110022489 Hallowell et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110040440 de Oliveira et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110082759 Swinson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110137758 Bienias Jun 2011 A1
20110161115 Hampton Jun 2011 A1
20110202471 Scott et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213641 Metzger, II et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110264595 Anspach et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270706 Anspach et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110270707 Breed et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276467 Blackburn et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110320241 Miller Dec 2011 A1
20120005045 Baker Jan 2012 A1
20120106801 Jackson May 2012 A1
20120109770 Seergy et al. May 2012 A1
20120197699 Snell et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221485 Leidner et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120239637 Prakash et al. Sep 2012 A9
20120254017 Fusco et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265648 Jerome et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271850 Licata Messana et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120331010 Christie Dec 2012 A1
20130006801 Solari et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130006809 Hollenshead et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130159033 Weinstock et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173453 Raines et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130238455 Laracey Sep 2013 A1
20130268298 Elkins et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140082017 Miller Mar 2014 A1
20140258309 Young Sep 2014 A1
20150227942 Sidman et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150310865 Fay et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150324400 Sheck et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150332411 Bush et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150348145 Nakajima Dec 2015 A1
20160004742 Mohan et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160012494 Lasini Jan 2016 A1
20160217046 Lamoureux et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160267588 Cain et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160299905 Geyer et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160321726 Singh et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160379486 Taylor Dec 2016 A1
20170052652 Denton et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170270490 Penilla et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170323295 Kranzley et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180018723 Nagla et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180107676 Vora Apr 2018 A1
20180108189 Park et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180157761 Halstead et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180165747 Patten et al. Jun 2018 A1
20190295133 Hirtenstein et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200065885 Smith Feb 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
0 749 081 Dec 1996 EP
1 122 664 Aug 2001 EP
09-251486 Sep 1997 JP
10-222559 Aug 1998 JP
10-261009 Sep 1998 JP
2000-331068 Nov 2000 JP
2001-297141 Oct 2001 JP
2001-344463 Dec 2001 JP
2001-357256 Dec 2001 JP
2002-149778 May 2002 JP
2002-163498 Jun 2002 JP
2002-259753 Sep 2002 JP
2003-271851 Sep 2003 JP
2003-316881 Nov 2003 JP
10-2000-0036594 Jul 2000 KR
10-2000-0063995 Nov 2000 KR
10-2001-0016349 Mar 2001 KR
10-2001-0035145 May 2001 KR
10-2002-0007132 Jan 2002 KR
10-2002-0068866 Aug 2002 KR
WO 99004350 Jan 1999 WO
WO 99022328 May 1999 WO
WO 01071458 Sep 2001 WO
WO 01075754 Oct 2001 WO
WO 03101123 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2007149941 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2008022289 Feb 2008 WO
WO 2018199992 Nov 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,438, Web-Based System and Method for Providing Comprehensive Vehicle Build Information, filed Nov. 16, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,416, System and Method for Providing Comprehensive Vehicle Information, filed Nov. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/669,250, 2020/0065885, System and Method for Providing Comprehensive Vehicle Information, filed Oct. 30, 2019.
“Activant PartExpert with Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Lookup”, Activant Solutions, Inc., Livermore, CA, Copyright 2006, http://counterworks.com/PartExp_DS_092806.pdf, pp. 2.
“AutoConnect Partners with Organic to Build World's Most Comprehensive Online Emporium of Pre-Owned Vehicles”, PR Newswire, May 19, 1998, pp. 2.
“Auto Market StatisticsSM:Drive Response with Aggregated Motor Vehicle Information”, Experian, Apr. 2007, http://www.experian.com/assets/marketing-services/product-sheets/auto-market-statistics.pdf, pp. 2.
“Appraisal Tool”, VAuto Live Market View, Dec. 14, 2007, http://www.vauto.com/vAuto_solution/appraisal.asp, pp. 3.
Autobytel.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20040806010507//http://autobytel.com/, as archived Aug. 6, 2004, pp. 3.
Bala, Pradip Kumar, “Purchase-Driven Classification for Improved Forecasting in Spare Parts Inventory Replenishment,” International Journal of Computer Applications, Nov. 2010, vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 40-45.
Bankrate.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20040809000026/www.bankrate.com/brm/default.asp, as archived Aug. 9, 2004, pp. 3.
“Carfax Teams with Esurance”, PR Newswire, May 14, 2001, p. 1.
Cars.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20041010081241/www.cars.com/go/index.jsp?aff=national, as archived Oct. 10, 2004, pp. 2.
Carsdirect.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20040730142836/www.carsdirect.com/home, as archived Jul. 30, 2004, pp. 2.
Checkbook.org, http://web.archive.org/web/20040604192834/www.checkbook.org/auto/carbarg.cfm, as archived Jun. 4, 2004, p. 1.
“Consumer Reports Finds American-Made Vehicles Close Reliability Gap with European-Made Vehicle—As Japanese Continue to Set New Benchmarks for the Industry”, Consumer Reports: Consumers Union, Yonkers, NY, Apr. 2003, pp. 2.
Cohen et al., “Optimizer: IBM's Multi Echelon Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics”, Interfaces, vol. 20, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1990, pp. 65-82.
Copeland et al., “Wallet-on-Wheels—Using Vehicle's Identity for Secure Mobile Money”, 17th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks, 2013, pp. 102-109.
“Driveitaway.com Links with AutoCheck to Provide Car Shoppers Vehicle Histories; Consumers Bidding on Driveitaway.com's Used Auto Auctions Can Now Go Online to Research a Specific Vehicle's History”, PR Newswire, Jan. 15, 2001, p. 1.
“Experian Uses SSA-NAME3 to Match 40 to 50 Million Transactions per Month Against an 11.5 Billion Row Database”, DM Review, Apr. 2001, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 3.
Farrell et al., “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation”, The American Economic Review, Dec. 1986, vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 940-955.
Garcia-Molina et al., “Database Systems: The Complete Book”, Prentice Hall, Inc., Ch. 15, 2002, pp. 713-715.
Grange, Frank, “Challenges in Modeling Demand for Inventory Optimization of Slow-Moving Items,” Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 1998, pp. 1211-1217.
Haffar, Imad, “‘SPAM’: A Computer Model for Management of Spare-Parts Inventories in Agricultural Machinery Dealerships”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 12, Issue 4, Jun. 1995, pp. 323-332.
Handfield et al., “Managing Component Life Cycles in Dynamic Technological Environments”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Tempe, Spring 1994, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 20-28.
Inderfurth et al., “Decision Support for Spare Parts Acquisition in Post Product Life Cycle”, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2008, vol. 16, pp. 17-42.
“Intelligence Insight Impact”, Polk Automotive Manufacturers; http://usa.polk.com/Industries/AutoMfr/Analyze/MarketAnalysis/, Dec. 13, 2007, pp. 3.
Invoicedealers.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20040804044511/http://www.invoicedealers.com/, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 2.
Ivillage.com, http://web.archive.org/web/20040729234947/http://www.ivillage.com/, Jul. 29, 2004, pp. 2.
“Japan's JAAI System Appraises Used Cars Over Internet”, Asia Pulse, Mar. 3, 2000, p. 1.
Jaro, Matthew A., “Probabilistic Linkage of Large Public Health Data Files”, Statistics in Medicine, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 491-498.
Käki, Anssi, “Forecasting in End-Of-Life Spare Parts Procurement”, Master's Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, System Analysis Laboratory, Jul. 27, 2007, pp. 84.
Kennedy et al., “An Overview of Recent Literature on Spare Parts Inventories”, International Journal of Production Economics, 2002, vol. 76, pp. 201-215.
Kim et al., “Optimal Pricing, EOL (End of Life) Warranty, and Spare Parts Manufacturing Strategy Amid Product Transition”, European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, vol. 188, pp. 723-745.
Koller, Mike, “Wireless Service Aids,” InternetWeek, Jul. 9, 2001, p. 15.
Krupp, James A.G., “Forecasting for the Automotive Aftermarket”, The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods & Systems, Winter 1993-1994, vol. 12, No. 4, ABI/Inform Global, pp. 8-12.
Lapide, Larry, “New Developments in Business Forecasting”, The Journal of Business Forecasting, Spring 2002, pp. 12-14.
Lee, Ho Geun, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, EM-Electronic Markets, Dec. 1997, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 24-28.
Miller, Joe, “NADA Used-Car Prices Go Online”, Automotive News, Jun. 14, 1999, p. 36.
Moore, John R., Jr. “Forecasting and Scheduling for Past-Model Replacement Parts”, Management Science, Application Series, vol. 18, No. 4, Part 1, Dec. 1971, pp. B-200-B-213.
“NAAA-Recommended Vehicle Condition Grading Scale”, Noted as early as 2007, pp. 3.
Packer, A. H., “Simulation and Adaptive Forecasting an Applied to Inventory Control”, Operations Research, Jul. 1965, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 660-679.
“Power Information Network: Power to Drive your Business”, J.D. Power and Associates Power Information Network, http://www.powerinfonet.com/products/productDetail.asp?type=financialinstitutions, Dec. 13, 2007, pp. 2.
Peters, Peter-Paul, “A Spare Parts Configurator for the European Service Business” (Graduation Report), Honeywell, Industrial Service Logistic Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar. 2000, pp. 80.
Porter, G. Zell, “An Economic Method for Evaluating Electronic Component Obsolescence Solutions”, www.gidep.org/data/dmsms/library/zell.pdf, May 1998, pp. 1-9.
“Pricing Tool”, vAuto Live Market View, http://www.avauto.com/vAuto_Solution/pricing.asp, Dec. 13, 2007, pp. 2.
Reinbach, Andrew, “MCIF Aids Banks in CRA Compliance”, Bank Systems & Technology, Aug. 1995, vol. 32, No. 8, p. 27.
Roos, Gina, “Web-Based Service Helps OEMs Cure Parts Obsolescence Blues”, Electronic Engineering Times, Oct. 8, 2001, p. 86.
Santarini, Michael, “Forecasts the Probable Obsolescence of Components—Module Predicts Parts Life”, Electronic Engineering Times, Jan. 11, 1999, vol. 1, p. 48.
Sawyers, Arlena, “NADA to Offer Residual Guide”, Automotive News, May 22, 2000, p. 1.
Shapiro et al., “Systems Competition and Aftermarkets: an Economic Analysis of Kodak”, The Antitrust Bulletin, Spring 1994, pp. 135-162.
“Stoneage Corporation Announces Database of 250,000 Used Cars Posted to the Internet”, PR Newswire, Feb. 24, 1998, p. 1.
Sullivan, Laurie, “Obsolete-Parts Program Thriving”, EBN, Manhasset, NY, Jan. 21, 2002, Issue 1296, p. 26.
“Urban Science Launches Second Generation Lead Scoring Solution”, Urban Science, Detroit, MI, Mar. 1, 2007, http://www.urbanscience.com/newsevents/pr_20070222.html, pp. 3.
“WashingtonPost.com and Cars.com Launch Comprehensive Automotive Web Site for the Washington Area”, PR Newswire, Oct. 22, 1998. pp. 2.
Watts, Craig, “Consumers Now Can Know What Loan Rate Offers to Expect Based on Their FICO Credit Score at MyFICO.com,” San Rafael, CA, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 2, http://www.myfico.com/PressRoom/PressReleases/2002_03_06.aspx.
Webster, Lee R., “Failure Rates & Life-Cycle Costs”, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, Apr. 1998, vol. 23, No. 4, ABI/INFORM Global, p. 42.
“Web Sites Let Automotive Consumers Arm Themselves with Price Information”, Orange County Register, Nov. 14, 1997, pp. 3.
“Yahoo! Autos Provides Enhanced Road Map for Researching, Buying and Selling Cars Online”, PR Newswire, Oct. 13, 1998, pp. 2.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61415207 Nov 2010 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13297438 Nov 2011 US
Child 16114931 US