Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of data processing systems. More particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus and method for Web-based user authentication techniques and associated applications.
Description of Related Art
Systems have also been designed for providing secure user authentication over a network using biometric sensors. In such systems, the score generated by an authenticator, and/or other authentication data, may be sent over a network to authenticate the user with a remote server. For example, Patent Application No. 2011/0082801 (“'801 Application”) describes a framework for user registration and authentication on a network which provides strong authentication (e.g., protection against identity theft and phishing), secure transactions (e.g., protection against “malware in the browser” and “man in the middle” attacks for transactions), and enrollment/management of client authentication tokens (e.g., fingerprint readers, facial recognition devices, smartcards, trusted platform modules, etc).
The assignee of the present application has developed a variety of improvements to the authentication framework described in the '801 application. Some of these improvements are described in the following set of U.S. patent applications (“Co-pending Applications”), which are assigned to the present assignee: Ser. No. 13/730,761, Query System and Method to Determine Authentication Capabilities; Ser. No. 13/730,776, System and Method for Efficiently Enrolling, Registering, and Authenticating With Multiple Authentication Devices; Ser. No. 13/730,780, System and Method for Processing Random Challenges Within an Authentication Framework; Ser. No. 13/730,791, System and Method for Implementing Privacy Classes Within an Authentication Framework; Ser. No. 13/730,795, System and Method for Implementing Transaction Signaling Within an Authentication Framework; and Ser. No. 14/218,504, Advanced Authentication Techniques and Applications (hereinafter “'504 Application”).
Briefly, the Co-Pending Applications describe authentication techniques in which a user enrolls with authentication devices (or Authenticators) such as biometric devices (e.g., fingerprint sensors) on a client device. When a user enrolls with a biometric device, biometric reference data is captured by the biometric sensor of the authentication device (e.g., by swiping a finger, snapping a picture, recording a voice, etc). The user may subsequently register the authentication devices with one or more servers over a network (e.g., Websites or other relying parties equipped with secure transaction services as described in the Co-Pending Applications), and subsequently authenticate with those servers using data exchanged during the registration process (e.g., cryptogtaphic keys provisioned into the authentication devices). Once authenticated, the user is permitted to perform one or more online transactions with a Website or other relying party. In the framework described in the Co-Pending Applications, sensitive information such as fingerprint data and other data which can be used to uniquely identify the user, may be retained locally on the user's authentication device to protect a user's privacy. The '504 Application describes a variety of additional techniques including techniques for designing composite authenticators, intelligently generating authentication assurance levels, using non-intrusive user verification, transferring authentication data to new authentication devices, augmenting authentication data with client risk data, and adaptively applying authentication policies, and creating trust circles, to name just a few.
The World Wide Web Consortium has specified a new set of Javascript Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that allows local media, including audio and video, to be requested from a platform. See, e.g., World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Working Draft: Media Capture and Streams (2013). Modern browsers such as Chrome® 21, Opera® 18, Firefox® 17 and their successors supporting these APIs can capture audio and video from a local device such as a video camera or microphone.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained from the following detailed description in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
Described below are embodiments of an apparatus, method, and machine-readable medium for implementing advanced authentication techniques and associated applications. Throughout the description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are not shown or are shown in a block diagram form to avoid obscuring the underlying principles of the present invention.
The embodiments of the invention discussed below involve authentication devices with user verification capabilities such as biometric modalities or PIN entry. These devices are sometimes referred to herein as “tokens,” “authentication devices,” or “authenticators.” While certain embodiments focus on facial recognition hardware/software (e.g., a camera and associated software for recognizing a user's face and tracking a user's eye movement), some embodiments may utilize additional biometric devices including, for example, fingerprint sensors, voice recognition hardware/software (e.g., a microphone and associated software for recognizing a user's voice), and optical recognition capabilities (e.g., an optical scanner and associated software for scanning the retina of a user). The user verification capabilities may also include non-biometric modalities, like PIN entry. The authenticators might use devices like trusted platform modules (TPMs), smartcards and secure elements for cryptographic operations and key storage.
In a mobile biometric implementation, the biometric device may be remote from the relying party. As used herein, the term “remote” means that the biometric sensor is not part of the security boundary of the computer it is communicatively coupled to (e.g., it is not embedded into the same physical enclosure as the relying party computer). By way of example, the biometric device may be coupled to the relying party via a network (e.g., the Internet, a wireless network link, etc) or via a peripheral input such as a USB port. Under these conditions, there may be no way for the relying party to know if the device is one which is authorized by the relying party (e.g., one which provides an acceptable level of authentication strength and integrity protection) and/or whether a hacker has compromised or even replaced the biometric device. Confidence in the biometric device depends on the particular implementation of the device.
The term “local” is used herein to refer to the fact that the user is completing a transaction in person, at a particular location such as at an automatic teller machine (ATM) or a point of sale (POS) retail checkout location. However, as discussed below, the authentication techniques employed to authenticate the user may involve non-location components such as communication over a network with remote servers and/or other data processing devices. Moreover, while specific embodiments are described herein (such as an ATM and retail location) it should be noted that the underlying principles of the invention may be implemented within the context of any system in which a transaction is initiated locally by an end user.
The term “relying party” is sometimes used herein to refer, not merely to the entity with which a user transaction is attempted (e.g., a Website or online service performing user transactions), but also to the secure transaction servers implemented on behalf of that entity which may performed the underlying authentication techniques described herein. The secure transaction servers may be owned and/or under the control of the relying party or may be under the control of a third party offering secure transaction services to the relying party as part of a business arrangement.
The term “server” is used herein to refer to software executed on a hardware platform (or across multiple hardware platforms) that receives requests over a network from a client, responsively performs one or more operations, and transmits a response to the client, typically including the results of the operations. The server responds to client requests to provide, or help to provide, a network “service” to the clients. Significantly, a server is not limited to a single computer (e.g., a single hardware device for executing the server software) and may, in fact, be spread across multiple hardware platforms, potentially at multiple geographical locations.
Turning first to
The authentication devices 110-112 are communicatively coupled to the client through an interface 102 (e.g., an application programming interface or API) exposed by a secure transaction service 101. The secure transaction service 101 is a secure application for communicating with one or more secure transaction servers 132-133 over a network and for interfacing with a secure transaction plugin 105 executed within the context of a web browser 104. As illustrated, the Interface 102 may also provide secure access to a secure storage device 120 on the client 100 which stores information related to each of the authentication devices 110-112 such as a device identification code, user identification code, user enrollment data (e.g., scanned fingerprint or other biometric data) protected by he authentication device, and keys wrapped by the authentication device used to perform the secure authentication techniques described herein. For example, as discussed in detail below, a unique key may be stored into each of the authentication devices and used when communicating to servers 130 over a network such as the Internet.
As discussed below, certain types of network transactions are supported by the secure transaction plugin 105 such as HTTP or HTTPS transactions with websites 131 or other servers. In one embodiment, the secure transaction plugin is initiated in response to specific HTML tags inserted into the HTML code of a web page by the web server 131 within the secure enterprise or Web destination 130 (sometimes simply referred to below as “server 130”). In response to detecting such a tag, the secure transaction plugin 105 may forward transactions to the secure transaction service 101 for processing. In addition, for certain types of transactions (e.g., such as secure key exchange) the secure transaction service 101 may open a direct communication channel with the on-premises transaction server 132 (i.e., co-located with the website) or with an off-premises transaction server 133.
The secure transaction servers 132-133 are coupled to a secure transaction database 120 for storing user data, authentication device data, keys and other secure information needed to support the secure authentication transactions described below. It should be noted, however, that the underlying principles of the invention do not require the separation of logical components within the secure enterprise or web destination 130 shown in
As mentioned above, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to a browser-based architecture shown in
In either of the embodiments shown in
In one embodiment of the invention, strong authentication between a client and an authentication service is carried over different channels (e.g., to different relying parties). As such, certain basic principles associated with registering and authenticating with an authentication service will be described with respect to
A secure key provisioning protocol such as the Dynamic Symmetric Key Provisioning Protocol (DSKPP) may be used to share the key with the client over a secure communication channel (see, e.g., Request for Comments (RFC) 6063). However, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular key provisioning protocol.
Turning to the specific details shown in
Turning to the specific details shown in
For a browser-based implementation, the website embeds a query for registered devices in the HTML page. This may be done in many ways other than embedding the query in an HTML page, such as through Javascript or using HTTP headers. The secure transaction plugin 105 receives the URL and sends it to secure transaction service 101, which searches the looks into the secure storage 120 (which, as discussed, includes a database of authentication device and user information) and determines whether there is a user enrolled within this URL. If so, the secure transaction service 101 sends a list of provisioned devices associated with this URL to the secure transaction plugin 105. The secure transaction plugin then calls the registered JavaScript API and passes this information to the server 130 (e.g., the website). The server 130 chooses the appropriate device from the sent device list, generates a random challenge and sends the device information, and argument back to the client. The website displays the corresponding user interface and asks for authentication from the user. The user then provides the requested authentication measure (e.g., swiping a finger across the fingerprint reader, speaking for voice recognition, etc). The secure transaction service 101 identifies the user (this step can be skipped for devices which don't support storing users), obtains the username from the database, generates an authentication token using the key and sends this information to the website via the secure transaction plugin. The server 130 identifies the user from the secure transaction database 120 and verifies the token by generating the same token on the server 130 (e.g., using its copy of the key). Once verified, the authentication process is complete.
At 451, the user enters a particular website URL into the browser 104 and is directed to the web server 131 within the enterprise/web destination servers 130 which includes the secure transaction servers 132-133. At 452, a query is sent back to the secure transaction service (via the browser and plugin) to determine which device(s) are registered with the website's URL. The secure transaction service 101 queries the secure storage 720 on the client 100 to identify a list of devices which are sent back to the server 130 at 453. At 454, the server 454 chooses a device to use for authentication, generates a random challenge and a timeout indication and, at 455, sends this information back to the secure transaction service 101.
At 456, the secure transaction service 456 automatically detects that the random challenge is no longer valid upon reaching the end of the timeout period. Various different techniques may be employed for indicating and detecting the end of the timeout period. In one embodiment, the timeout period comprises a period of time for which the random challenge is considered valid. After the timeout period has elapsed, the random challenge is no longer considered valid by the server 130. In one embodiment, the timeout period is specified simply as a point in time at which the random challenge will no longer be valid. Once this point in time is reached, the random challenge is invalid. In another embodiment, the timeout period is specified by using a current timestamp (i.e., the time at which the random challenge is generated by the server 130) and a duration. The secure transaction service 101 may then calculate the timeout time by adding the duration value to the timestamp to calculate the point in time when the random challenge becomes invalid. It should be noted, however, that the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any specific technique for calculating the timeout period.
Upon detecting the expiration of the random challenge, at 457, the secure transaction service 101 transparently (i.e., without user intervention) notifies the server 130 and requests a new random challenge. In response, at 458, the server 130 generates a new random challenge and a new indication of the timeout period. As mentioned, the new timeout period may be the same as previously sent to the client or may be modified. In either case, at 459, the new random challenge and timeout indication are sent to the secure transaction service 101.
The remainder of the transaction diagram shown in
The particular implementation shown in
The policy filter 501 may determine the client authentication capabilities by reading the capabilities from the client's secure storage area 520. As previously discussed, the secure storage 520 may comprise a repository of all of the client's authentication capabilities (e.g., identification codes for all of the authentication devices). If the user has already enrolled the user with its authentication devices, the user's enrollment data is stored within the secure storage 520. If the client has already registered an authentication device with a server 130, then the secure storage may also store an encrypted secret key associated with each authentication device.
Using the authentication data extracted from the secure storage 520 and the policy provided by the server, the policy filter 501 may then identify a subset of authentication capabilities to be used. Depending on the configuration, the policy filter 501 may identify a complete list of authentication capabilities supported by both the client and the server or may identify a subset of the complete list. For example, if the server supports authentication capabilities A, B, C, D, and E and the client has authentication capabilities A, B, C, F, and G, then the policy filter 501 may identify the entire subset of common authentication capabilities to the server: A, B, and C. Alternatively, if a higher level of privacy is desired, as indicated by user preferences 530 in
Depending on what operation has been initiated by server 130 (Registration or Authentication), the secure transaction service 130 performs that operation on the filtered subset of authentication devices (110-112) and sends the operation response back to server 130 via the secure transaction plugin 105 as shown in
In one embodiment of the invention, browsers that allow local media (e.g., audio and video) to be requested from a computing platform are used to support voice and video capture for user registration and authentication. For example, in one embodiment, the browser media capture and stream API is used to capture audio and video during registration and authentication with a remote server (e.g., such as the relying party's secure transaction servers described above). This capability allows web applications to implement user authentication via biometric matching without the need for additional client software (including browser extensions). For example, user authentication via voice/face matching may be performed directly from web applications running in the browser. In some embodiments described below, it is assumed that the user has already created an account with the relying party, which has a unique identifier such as user name.
As illustrated, the media capture logic 605 may interface with a microphone 610 for capturing audio and with a camera 611 for capturing video. The medial capture logic 605 may access the microphone 610 and camera 611 via the device drivers configured on the client 600 for these devices. In one embodiment, the media capture logic 605 comprises the Javascript Media Capture and Streams API (see World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Working Draft: Media Capture and Streams (2013)). However, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular type of program code or API implementation.
In the embodiments described below, the user registers and authenticates remotely with a relying party 630 having a website 631 and one or more authentication servers 650. For registration, the user initially logs in his/her account at the website 631 from the browser 604. The browser 604 and the authentication server 650 may then establish a secure communication channel using a protocol such as secure sockets layer (SSL) or transport layer security (TLS) (although the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular secure communication protocol).
In one embodiment, the web application 601 running in the browser 604 then prompts the user to enroll his/her voice/face/body part biometric. For voice, this process may record the user's speech of certain words or phrases using the microphone 610 and provide the raw voice data to the web authentication application 601 via the media capture logic 605 API (e.g., with the web authentication application 601 making a call to the API to gather the voice data). For facial recognition authentication, this may involve taking a snapshot of the user's face with the camera 611 and providing the raw image data to the web authentication application 601 via the media capture logic 605 API (e.g., with the web authentication application 601 making a call to the API to gather the image). For other body parts, this may involve capturing an image of the user's hand shape, tip of a finger (for fingerprint recognition), ear shape, iris pattern, or any other image which may be used for authentication purposes (i.e., for which a biometric matching algorithm may be employed).
In one embodiment, the web application 601 sends the raw biometric data to the authentication server 650. A feature extraction module 652 on the authentication server 650 extracts specified characteristics of the raw biometric data (e.g., focusing on certain regions of the user's face or other body part, certain characteristics of the user's voice, etc) to generate biometric reference data 656 that will be used for future authentication. For example, the feature extraction module 652 may extract certain spectral features of the user's voice and/or certain geometric or photometric characteristics of the image of the user's face or other body part to generate the biometric reference data 656. In one embodiment, the biometric reference data 656 is stored in a database and associated with the user's account at the relying party 630.
Once the biometric reference data 656 is stored, the following operations may be used for authentication. The browser 604 and authentication server 650 establish a secure communication channel (e.g., via SSL/TLS or other security protocol) and the user provides a user ID or other identification code in the web authentication application 601. The web authentication application 601 may then prompt the user to authenticate using his/her voice, face, or other portion of the user's body. For example, the user may be prompted to speak one or more words via the microphone 610 or to capture a facial/body part image via the camera 611. The media capture logic 605 may the provide the voice recording or image to the web authentication application 601.
The web authentication application 601 sends the user's identifier and the captured raw biometric data to the authentication server 650. In one embodiment, the authentication server 650 queries for the stored biometric reference data 656 with the user's identifier. Matcher logic 654 compares the biometric reference data 656 with certain features of the raw biometric data extracted by the feature extraction logic 652 and generates an authentication result. In one embodiment, the feature extraction module 652 is configured to extract the same features as those extracted during the registration process (e.g., spectral characteristics of the user's voice, geometric or photometric characteristics of the user's image, etc). The underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular set of extracted features. Any set of features which are useful for performing voice recognition, face recognition, or recognition of any portion of the user's body may be used.
In one embodiment, the “authentication result” comprises a score based on the similarity between the extracted features and the biometric reference data 110. The authentication server 650 may then use the score to determine whether the authentication was successful (e.g., if the score is above a certain specified threshold).
At 701, the user logs into a website of the relying party from a browser and establishes a secure communication channel with a server of the relying party. At 702, a Web application running in the browser prompts the user to enroll and register a new face/body part or voice biometric. At 703, the user's voice is sampled from a microphone and/or a picture of the user's face or other body part is captured with a camera on the client. As mentioned, in one embodiment, the voice/video is captured using built-in media capture logic within the browser context. At 704, the server receives and converts the raw biometric data to generate biometric reference data. For example, certain characteristics of the user's voice may be extracted from the raw voice data and/or certain characteristics of the user's face or other body part may be extracted from the raw video image(s). The resulting biometric reference data may be associated with the user's account and saved in a database (from which it may subsequently be accessed during authentication). At 705 the registration process is complete.
Turning to the authentication method of
At 805, the web application sends the user's identifier and the captured raw biometric data to the server. At 806, the server identifies the stored biometric reference data based on the user's identifier and performs biometric matching based on extracted characteristics of the raw biometric data (e.g., characteristics of the raw voice/video data). If a match is detected, determined at 807, then the transaction is permitted at 808; if not, then the transaction is denied at 809 and/or additional authentication techniques are requested. As mentioned, a “match” may be determined by calculating a score based on the correlation between the characteristics extracted from the raw biometric data and the biometric reference data, and determining whether the score is above a specified threshold.
As in
In operation, the user logs in to his/her account on a relying party 930 website 931 from the browser 904 (e.g., using a user name/password). The browser 904 then establishes a secure communication channel (e.g., via SSL/TLS) with an authentication server 950 and (if not already registered) receives a registration request from the authentication server 950. The web authentication application 901 may process the registration request using the remote registration techniques described above (e.g., generating a public/private key pair, performing policy filtering, etc). If the registration policy permits, the web authentication application 901 prompts the user to enroll his/her voice/face/body part biometric (e.g., recording the user's speech of certain phrases and/or taking a snapshot of the user's face or other body part). As in prior embodiments, to capture the user's voice/face/body part biometric, the web application 901 may call the media capture logic 905 (e.g., using a Javascript Media Capture and Streams API).
In one embodiment, the web authentication application 901 processes the captured user biometric data and may convert the data to the form that it may used for authentication. For example, the web authentication application 901 may converts the raw biometric data to generate biometric reference data, stored within a secure storage 956 on the client 900. For example, certain characteristics of the user's voice may be extracted from the raw voice data and/or certain characteristics of the user's face or other portion of the user's body may be extracted from the raw video image(s). In one embodiment, using the media capture logic 905, this series of operations take place within the browser 904.
In one embodiment, the web authentication application generates a private/public key pair as described for some embodiments above. Once generated, the web authentication application 901 may securely store the private key within secure storage 956 and send a secure registration response to the authentication server 950 containing the public key. In one embodiment, the authentication server 950 may then store the public key in a database entry associated with the user's account. In one embodiment, the public/private key generation (and all other key-based operations) are implemented using the Javascript WebCrypto API. However, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular type of program code for processing and managing keys. Once the keys have been successfully generated and exchanged, the registration process terminates.
For authentication, in response to the user attempting to enter into a transaction with the relying party 930, the browser 904 and the authentication server 950 establish a secure communication channel (e.g., via SSL/TLS). The web authentication application 901 running in the browser initiates authentication with the authentication server 950, which then transmits an authentication request to the web authentication application 901 Upon receipt, the web authentication application 901 may process the server authentication request as described in the above embodiments (e.g., generating a random challenge, using policy filtering to select authentication methods, etc.). If permitted by the policy, the web authentication application 901 prompts the user to authenticate using a voice biometric, face biometric, or a biometric involving another portion of the user's body. As in prior embodiments, for voice, the media capture logic 905 may use the microphone 910 to capture the user's speech of certain words or phrases. For face/body, the media capture logic 905 may use the camera 911 take a snapshot of the user's face or portion of the user's body. The results are then provided to the web authentication application 901 via a call to the media capture API (e.g., the Javascript Media Capture and Streams API in one embodiment).
In one embodiment, the feature extraction module 952 extracts specified features from the raw voice/face/body part data and the matcher 954 compares the extracted features with features from the biometric reference data 956 to generates an authentication result. In one embodiment, the “authentication result” comprises a score based on the similarity between the extracted features and the biometric reference data 956. The web authentication application may then use the score to determine whether the authentication was successful (e.g., if the score is above a certain specified threshold).
In one embodiment, if authentication is successful, then the web authentication application 901 locates the private key associated with the matching biometric data. It then uses the private key as previously described to perform remote authentication with the authentication server 950 (e.g., using the private key to generate a signature over a challenge provided by the authentication server 950 and/or encrypting a session key to establish a secure channel). In one embodiment, the web authentication application performs all key-related operations using the Javascript WebCrypto API. If authentication is successful, then the relying party 930 will allow the user to perform the desired transaction (e.g., the transaction on the website 931 which prompted the authentication request).
At 1001, the user logs into a website of the relying party from a browser and establishes a secure communication channel with a server of the relying party (e.g., the authentication server described above) and (if not already registered) receives a registration request at 1002 from the authentication server. The web authentication application 901 may process the registration request using the remote registration techniques described above (e.g., generating a public/private key pair, performing policy filtering, etc). If the registration policy permits, at 1003, the web authentication application prompts the user to enroll his/her voice/face/body part biometric (e.g., recording the user's speech of certain phrases and/or taking a snapshot of the user's face or portions of the user's body). The user's voice may be sampled from a microphone and/or a picture of the user's face/body part may be captured with a camera on the client. As mentioned, in one embodiment, the voice/video is captured using built-in media capture logic within the browser context (e.g., using a Javascript Media Capture and Streams API in one embodiment).
At 1004, the server receives and converts the raw biometric data to generate biometric reference data. For example, certain characteristics of the user's voice may be extracted from the raw voice data and/or certain characteristics of the user's face or other body part may be extracted from the raw video image(s). The resulting biometric reference data may be associated with the user's account and saved in a secure storage device on the client (from which it may subsequently be accessed during authentication).
At 1005, the web authentication application generates a public/private key pair and stores the keys within a secure storage on the client (which may be the same or a different storage than that used for the biometric reference data). At 1006, a registration response is sent to the authentication server which includes the public key of the public/private key pair. At 1006, the server identifies the user account (e.g., using the user ID or other identifying code) and securely stores the public key.
At 1104, the biometric data is captured via the browser. As mentioned above, to capture the user's voice/face/body part biometric, one embodiment of the invention initiates a call to the dedicated media capture logic built into the browser (e.g., the web application calls the Javascript Media Capture and Streams API).
At 1105, the web application compares the biometric reference data with certain features of the raw biometric data extracted in operation 1104 and generates an authentication result. In one embodiment, the same features are extracted as those extracted during the registration process (e.g., spectral characteristics of the user's voice, geometric or photometric characteristics of the user's image, etc). In one embodiment, the “authentication result” comprises a score based on the similarity between the extracted features and the biometric reference data. The web application may then use the score to determine whether the authentication was successful (e.g., if the score is above a certain specified threshold).
If successful, determined at 1107, then the transaction is permitted and an indication of successful authentication is sent to the authentication server at 1108. If not successful, then at 1109 the transaction is disallowed and an authentication failure is sent to the authentication server.
As illustrated in
According to one embodiment of the invention, the exemplary architecture of the data processing system 1300 may used for the mobile devices described above. The data processing system 1300 includes the processing system 1320, which may include one or more microprocessors and/or a system on an integrated circuit. The processing system 1320 is coupled with a memory 1310, a power supply 1325 (which includes one or more batteries) an audio input/output 1340, a display controller and display device 1360, optional input/output 1350, input device(s) 1370, and wireless transceiver(s) 1330. It will be appreciated that additional components, not shown in
The memory 1310 may store data and/or programs for execution by the data processing system 1300. The audio input/output 1340 may include a microphone and/or a speaker to, for example, play music and/or provide telephony functionality through the speaker and microphone. The display controller and display device 1360 may include a graphical user interface (GUI). The wireless (e.g., RF) transceivers 1330 (e.g., a WiFi transceiver, an infrared transceiver, a Bluetooth transceiver, a wireless cellular telephony transceiver, etc.) may be used to communicate with other data processing systems. The one or more input devices 1370 allow a user to provide input to the system. These input devices may be a keypad, keyboard, touch panel, multi touch panel, etc. The optional other input/output 1350 may be a connector for a dock.
Embodiments of the invention may include various steps as set forth above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps. Alternatively, these steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
Elements of the present invention may also be provided as a machine-readable medium for storing the machine-executable program code. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic program code.
Throughout the foregoing description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. For example, it will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art that the functional modules and methods described herein may be implemented as software, hardware or any combination thereof. Moreover, although some embodiments of the invention are described herein within the context of a mobile computing environment, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to a mobile computing implementation. Virtually any type of client or peer data processing devices may be used in some embodiments including, for example, desktop or workstation computers. Accordingly, the scope and spirit of the invention should be judged in terms of the claims which follow.
Embodiments of the invention may include various steps as set forth above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps. Alternatively, these steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/268,733, filed May 2, 2014, all of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5280527 | Gullman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5764789 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6035406 | Moussa et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088450 | Davis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6178511 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6270011 | Gottfried | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6377691 | Swift et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6510236 | Crane et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6588812 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618806 | Brown | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6751733 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801998 | Hanna et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842896 | Redding et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6938156 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7155035 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7194761 | Champagne | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194763 | Potter et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7263717 | Boydstun et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7444368 | Wong et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7487357 | Smith et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512567 | Bemmel et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7698565 | Bjorn | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7865937 | White et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7941669 | Foley et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8060922 | Crichton et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8166531 | Suzuki | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8245030 | Lin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284043 | Judd et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291468 | Chickering | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8353016 | Pravetz et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8359045 | Hopkins, III | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8412928 | Bowness | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8458465 | Stern et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489506 | Hammad et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8516552 | Raleigh | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526607 | Liu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555340 | Potter et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561152 | Novak et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8584219 | Toole et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8584224 | Pei et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8607048 | Nogawa | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8646060 | Ben | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8713325 | Ganesan | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719905 | Ganesan | May 2014 | B2 |
8776180 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8843997 | Hare | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8856541 | Chaudhury et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8949978 | Lin et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8958599 | Starner | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8978117 | Bentley et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9015482 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9032485 | Chu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9083689 | Lindemann et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9161209 | Ghoshal et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9171306 | He et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9172687 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9219732 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9306754 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317705 | O'Hare et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9367678 | Pal et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396320 | Lindemann | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9698976 | Statica et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
20010037451 | Bhagavatula et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010857 | Karthik | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016913 | Wheeler et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020037736 | Kawaguchi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040344 | Preiser et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054695 | Bjorn et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073316 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073320 | Rinkevich et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087894 | Foley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112170 | Foley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174344 | Ting | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174348 | Ting | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190124 | Piotrowski | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030021283 | See et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055792 | Kinoshita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065805 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084300 | Koike | May 2003 | A1 |
20030087629 | Juitt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115142 | Brickell et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135740 | Talmor et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152252 | Kondo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030226036 | Bivens et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236991 | Letsinger | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039909 | Cheng | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040101170 | Tisse et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123153 | Wright et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050021964 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050080716 | Belyi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097320 | Golan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100166 | Smetters et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125295 | Tidwell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160052 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187883 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050223217 | Howard et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223236 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050278253 | Meek et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060026671 | Potter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029062 | Rao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060101136 | Akashika et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156385 | Chiviendacz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161435 | Atef et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161672 | Jolley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177061 | Orsini et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213978 | Geller et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060282670 | Karchov | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005988 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070077915 | Black et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088950 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094165 | Gyorfi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100756 | Varma | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106895 | Huang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118883 | Potter et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070165625 | Eisner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168677 | Kudo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169182 | Wolfond et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198435 | Siegal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070234417 | Blakley, III et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239980 | Funayama | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070278291 | Rans et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286130 | Shao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005562 | Sather et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025234 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028453 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034207 | Cam-Winget et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046334 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046984 | Bohmer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049983 | Miller et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072054 | Choi | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086759 | Colson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080134311 | Medvinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141339 | Gomez et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080172725 | Fujii et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184351 | Gephart et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189212 | Kulakowski et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209545 | Asano | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080232565 | Kutt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235801 | Soderberg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080271150 | Boerger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289019 | Lam | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289020 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313719 | Kaliski, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320308 | Kostiainen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090049510 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055322 | Bykov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064292 | Carter et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083850 | Fadell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089870 | Wahl | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100269 | Naccache | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116651 | Liang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119221 | Weston et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133113 | Schneider | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138724 | Chiou et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138727 | Campello | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158425 | Chan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164797 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183003 | Haverinen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187988 | Hulten et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193508 | Brenneman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196418 | Tkacik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090199264 | Lang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204964 | Foley et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235339 | Mennes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090271618 | Camenisch et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271635 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300714 | Ahn | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300720 | Guo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307139 | Mardikar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327131 | Beenau et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328197 | Newell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010932 | Law et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023454 | Exton et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029300 | Chen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042848 | Rosener | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100062744 | Ibrahim | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082484 | Erhart et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083000 | Kesanupalli | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094681 | Almen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105427 | Gupta | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107222 | Glasser | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114776 | Weller et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121855 | Dalia et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100169650 | Brickell et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175116 | Gum | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186072 | Kumar | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191612 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192209 | Steeves et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205658 | Griffin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223663 | Morimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242088 | Thomas | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100266128 | Asokan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100287369 | Monden | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299738 | Wahl | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100325427 | Ekberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325664 | Kang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325684 | Grebenik et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325711 | Etchegoyen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004918 | Chow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110004933 | Dickinson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022835 | Schibuk | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110047608 | Levenberg | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071841 | Fomenko et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078443 | Greenstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082801 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083016 | Kesanupalli | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093942 | Koster et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099361 | Shah et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107087 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138450 | Kesanupalli | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157346 | Zyzdryn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167154 | Bush et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167472 | Evans et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191200 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197267 | Gravel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219427 | Hito et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225431 | Stufflebeam, Jr. et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228330 | Nogawa | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231911 | White et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246766 | Orsini et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265159 | Ronda et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279228 | Kumar | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280402 | Ibrahim et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296518 | Faynberg et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307706 | Fielder | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307949 | Ronda et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313872 | Carter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314549 | Song et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320823 | Saroiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120018506 | Hammad et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023568 | Cha et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046012 | Forutanpour et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047555 | Xiao et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066757 | Vysogorets et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075062 | Osman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084566 | Chin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102553 | Hsueh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124639 | Shaikh et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124651 | Ganesan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144461 | Rathbun | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159577 | Belinkiy et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191979 | Feldbau | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203906 | Jaudon et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210135 | Panchapakesan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120249298 | Sovio et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272056 | Ganesan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278873 | Calero et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291114 | Poliashenko et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313746 | Rahman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317297 | Bailey | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013931 | O'Hare et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042115 | Sweet et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130042327 | Chow | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046976 | Rosati et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046991 | Lu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047200 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054336 | Graylin | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054967 | Davoust et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055370 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061055 | Schibuk | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067546 | Thavasi et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073859 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086669 | Sondhi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090939 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097682 | Zeljkovic et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104187 | Weidner | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104190 | Simske et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119130 | Braams | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124285 | Pravetz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124422 | Hubert et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125197 | Pravetz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125222 | Pravetz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133049 | Peirce | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133054 | Davis et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144785 | Karpenko et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159413 | Davis et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159716 | Buck et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160083 | Schrix et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160100 | Langley | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167196 | Spencer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191884 | Leicher et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212637 | Guccione et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219456 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227646 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239173 | Dispensa | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246272 | Kirsch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262305 | Jones et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282589 | Shoup et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130308778 | Fosmark et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318343 | Bjarnason et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326215 | Leggette et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130337777 | Deutsch et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346176 | Alolabi et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002238 | Taveau et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140007215 | Romano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013422 | Janus et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033271 | Barton et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040987 | Haugsnes | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140044265 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047510 | Belton et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066015 | Aissi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140068746 | Gonzalez et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075516 | Chermside | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089243 | Oppenheimer | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096182 | Smith | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101439 | Pettigrew et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140109174 | Barton et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114857 | Griggs et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115702 | Li et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140130127 | Toole et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137191 | Goldsmith et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164776 | Hook et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173754 | Barbir | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188770 | Agrafioti et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189350 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189360 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189779 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189791 | Lindemann et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189807 | Cahill et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189808 | Mahaffey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189828 | Baghdasaryan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189835 | Umerley | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201809 | Choyi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140230032 | Duncan | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245391 | Adenuga | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140250523 | Savvides et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258125 | Gerber et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258711 | Brannon | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279516 | Rellas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282868 | Sheller et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282945 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282965 | Sambamurthy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289116 | Polivanyi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289117 | Baghdasaryan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289820 | Lindemann | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289833 | Briceno et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289834 | Lindemann | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298419 | Boubez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140304505 | Dawson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333413 | Kursun et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140335824 | Abraham | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337948 | Hoyos | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150019220 | Talhami et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150046340 | Dimmick | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058931 | Miu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150095999 | Toth et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150096002 | Shuart et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121068 | Lindemann et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134330 | Baldwin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142628 | Suplee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150180869 | Verma | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150244525 | McCusker et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244696 | Ma | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150269050 | Filimonov et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150326529 | Morita | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150373039 | Wang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381580 | Graham, III et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160036588 | Thackston | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072787 | Balabine et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078869 | Syrdal et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160087952 | Tartz et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160087957 | Shah et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160188958 | Martin | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160292687 | Kruglick et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170004487 | Hagen et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011406 | Tunnell et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170048070 | Gulati et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170109751 | Dunkelberger et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170195121 | Frei et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170221068 | Krauss et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170317833 | Smith et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330174 | Demarinis et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330180 | Song et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170331632 | Leoutsarakos et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180039990 | Lindemann et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180191501 | Lindemann | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180191695 | Lindemann | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1705925 | Dec 2005 | CN |
101394283 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101495956 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102713922 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102763111 | Oct 2012 | CN |
103999401 | Aug 2014 | CN |
2357754 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2002152189 | May 2002 | JP |
2003143136 | May 2003 | JP |
2004348308 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2007220075 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008065844 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2013016070 | Jan 2013 | JP |
200701120 | Jan 2007 | TW |
201121280 | Jun 2011 | TW |
03017159 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2005003985 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2007023756 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2009158530 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010067433 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2013082190 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2014105994 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2015130734 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abate A., et al.,“2D and 3D face recognition: A survey”, 2007, pp. 1885-1906. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,791 dated Jan. 23, 2015, 4 pages. |
Akhtar Z., et al., “Spoof Attacks on Multimodal Biometric Systems”, International Conference on Information and Network Technology, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 46-51. |
Bao, W., et al., “A liveness detection method for face recognition based on optical flow field”, 2009, pp. 233-236, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5054589&isnumber=5054562. |
Barker E., et al., “Recommendation for key management Part 3: Application—Specific Key Management Guidance”, NIST Special Publication 800-57, 2009, pp. 1-103. |
BehavioSec, “Measuring FAR/FRR/EER in Continuous Authentication,” Stockholm, Sweden (2009), 8 pages. |
Brickell, E., et al., Intel Corporation; Jan Camenish, IBM Research; Liqun Chen, HP Laboratories. “Direct Anonymous Attestation”. Feb. 11, 2004, pp. 1-28 [online]. Retrieved from the Internet URL:https://eprint.iacr.org/2004/205.pdf. |
Chakka M., et al., “Competition on Counter Measures to 2-D Facial Spoofing Attacks”. 6 pages .2011. http://www.csis.pace.edu/-ctappert/dps/IJCB2011/papers/130.pdf. 978-1-4577-1359-0/11. |
Chen L., et al., “Flexible and scalable digital signatures in TPM 2.0.” Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security. ACM, 2013, 12 pages. |
Chetty G. School of ISE University of Canberra Australia. “Multilevel liveness verification for face-voice biometric authentication”. BYSM—2006 Symposium. Baltimore: BYSM—Symposium 9 pages. Sep. 19, 2006. http://www.biometrics.org/bc2006/presentations/Tues_Sep_19/BSYM/19_Chetty_research.pdf. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC for EP Application No. 15826364.0, dated Mar. 7, 2017, 2 pages. |
Crazy Egg Heatmap Shows Where People Click on Your Website, 2012, 3 pages, www.michaelhartzell.com/Blog/bid/92970/Crazy-Egg-Heatmap-shows-where-people-click-on-your-website). |
Dawei Zhang; Peng Hu, “Trusted e-commerce user agent based on USB Key”, Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2008 vol. I, IMECS 2008, Mar. 19-21, 2008, Hong Kong, 7 pages. |
Delac K. et al., Eds., “Image Compression in Face Recognition a Literature Survey,” InTech, Jun. 1, 2008, ISBN 978-953-7619-34-3, Uploaded as individual Chapters 1-15, downloaded from https://www.intechopen.com/books/recent_advances_in_face_recognition/image_compression_in_face_recognition_-_a_literature_survey, 15 pages. |
Doherty, et al., Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), “Dynamic Symmetric Key Provisioning Protocol (DSKPP)”, Dec. 2010, 105 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13867269, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14803988.6, dated Dec. 23, 2016, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15786487.7, dated Oct. 23, 2017, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15786796.1, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15826660.1, dated Nov. 16, 2017, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15827334.2, dated Nov. 17, 2017, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 14770682.4, dated Jan. 17, 2017, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,761 dated Jan. 15, 2015, 31 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,761 dated Jul. 8, 2014, 36 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,776 dated Nov. 3, 2014, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,780 dated Jan. 27, 2015, 30 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,780 dated May 12, 2014, 34 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,791 dated Nov. 13, 2014, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,795 dated Aug. 14, 2014, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273 dated Feb. 11, 2016, 29 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273, dated Jan. 10, 2017, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273, dated Sep. 8, 2017, 30 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384 dated Aug. 20, 2015, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,466, dated Apr. 13, 2017, 61 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,504, dated Sep. 12, 2017, 83 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551 dated Sep. 9, 2015, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551 dated Sep. 16, 2016, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575 dated Aug. 7, 2015, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575 dated Jul. 7, 2016, 29 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575, dated Jul. 31, 2017, 42 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,611, dated Jan. 27, 2017, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646 dated Aug. 11, 2016, 25 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646, dated Sep. 27, 2017, 81 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,677, dated Sep. 28, 2017, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 27 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692 dated Mar. 2, 2016, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,743, dated Mar. 3, 2017, 67 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,563, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 46 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,619 dated Dec. 14, 2015, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,733 dated Jan. 15, 2016, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,776 dated Jul. 15, 2014, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,780 dated Aug. 4, 2014, 30 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,780 dated Mar. 12, 2014, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,791 dated Jun. 27, 2014, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,795 dated Jan. 5, 2015, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,795 dated Jun. 11, 2014, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273 dated Jun. 16, 2016, 43 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273 dated May 8, 2015, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273, dated May 18, 2017, 46 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384 dated Jan. 7, 2015, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384 dated Mar. 17, 2016, 40 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,439 dated Feb. 12, 2015, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,466 dated Sep. 9, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,533 dated Jan. 26, 2015, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,607 dated Mar. 20, 2015, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,504, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551 dated Apr. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551 dated Jan. 21, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551 dated May 12, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575 dated Feb. 10, 2015, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575 dated Jan. 29, 2016, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575, dated May 4, 2017, 88 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,611 dated Jun. 16, 2016, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,611, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 76 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646 dated Mar. 10, 2016, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646, dated Mar. 27, 2017, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,677 dated Aug. 2, 2016, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,677, dated Feb. 10, 2017, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692 dated Nov. 4, 2015, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692 dated Oct. 25, 2016, 33 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 37 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,743, dated Aug. 2, 2017, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,743 dated Aug. 19, 2016, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,743 dated Jan. 21, 2016, 12 pages. |
Non-final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,563, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 83 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,619 dated Aug. 24, 2015, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,619 dated Mar. 21, 2016, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,733 dated Jul. 16, 2015, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,641 dated Nov. 9, 2015, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,747 dated Aug. 19, 2016, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,814, dated Apr. 5, 2017, 57 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,814 dated Aug. 4, 2015, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,868 dated Dec. 31, 2015, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992 dated Dec. 3, 2015, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,328, dated Jul. 14, 2017, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,328, dated Sep. 15, 2016, 39 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,452 dated Oct. 13, 2017, 76 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992 dated May 12, 2016, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,761 dated Jun. 10, 2015, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,761 dated Sep. 28, 2015, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,776 dated Feb. 13, 2015, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,776 dated Mar. 24, 2015, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,780 dated Aug. 13, 2015, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,791 dated Mar. 10, 2015, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,795 dated Jan. 14, 2016, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,795 dated May 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,795 dated Sep. 17, 2015, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384 dated Sep. 27, 2016, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384, dated Dec. 1, 2017, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384, dated Jul. 26, 2017, 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,384, dated May 23, 2017, 50 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,439 dated Jul. 6, 2015, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,439 dated Mar. 14, 2016, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,439 dated Oct. 28, 2015, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,533 dated Jan. 20, 2016, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,533 dated May 11, 2015, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,533 dated Sep. 14, 2015, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,607 dated Feb. 1, 2016, 28 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,607 dated Sep. 2, 2015, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. 14/218,551, dated Aug. 16, 2017, 24 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551, dated Dec. 13, 2017, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 56 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,551, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,619 dated Oct. 3, 2016, 65 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,619 dated Jul. 19, 2016, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,686 dated Apr. 18, 2016, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,686 dated Jul. 8, 2016, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,686 dated Mar. 30, 2016, 38 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,686 dated Nov. 5, 2015, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,733 dated Sep. 23, 2016, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,733, dated Jan. 20, 2017, 62 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,641 dated Jun. 7, 2016, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,697 dated Jan. 14, 2016, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,697 dated May 20, 2016, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,697 dated Sep. 1, 2016, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,697 dated Sep. 15, 2015, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,747, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,868, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 62 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,868, dated Jun. 26, 2017, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,868, dated Mar. 23, 2017, 57 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,868, dated Nov. 17, 2017, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 28 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992, dated Jul. 17, 2017, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,992 dated Sep. 6, 2016, 26 pages. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US14/39627, dated Dec. 10, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion from counterpart Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US13/77888, dated Aug. 4, 2014, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion from counterpart Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US14/31344, dated Nov. 3, 2014, 16 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion from counterpart Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US14/39627, dated Oct. 16, 2014, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal or International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2015/028927, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 12 pages. |
Office Action and Search Report from foreign counterpart Chinese Patent Application No. 201480031042.X, dated Dec. 4, 2017, 20 pages. |
Office Action from foreign counterpart Taiwan Patent Application No. 102148853, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 9 pages. |
Pan G., et al., “Liveness Detection for Face Recognition” in: Recent Advances in Face Recognition, 2008, pp. 109-124, Vienna : I-Tech, 2008, Ch. 9, ISBN: 978-953-7619-34-3. |
Pan G., et al., “Monocular Camera-based Face Liveness Detection by Combining Eyeblink and Scene Context,” pp. 215-225, s.l. : Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, Aug. 4, 2010. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.cs.zju.edu.cn/-gpan/publication/2011-TeleSysliveness.pdf. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 14770682.4, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 8 pages. |
Peng Y., et al., “RASL: Robust Alignment by Sparse and Low-Rank Decomposition for Linearly Correlated Images”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010, pp. 763-770. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://yima.csl.illinois.edu/psfile/RASL CVPR10.pdf. |
Phillips P.J., et al., “Biometric Image Processing and Recognition,” Chellappa, 1998, Eusipco, 8 pages. |
Phillips P.J., et al., “Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002: Evaluation Report,” s.l. : NISTIR 6965, 2002, 56 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.facerec.org/vendors/FRVT2002_Evaluation_Report.pdf. |
Phillips P.J., et al., “FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Results”, NIST IR 7408, Gaithersburg, NIST, 2006, Mar. 29, 2007, pp. 1-55. |
Pinto A., et al., “Video-Based Face Spoofing Detection through Visual Rhythm Analysis,” Los Alamitos : IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services, 2012, Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, 8 pages. (SIBGRAPI). Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://sibgrapi.sid.inpe.br/rep/sid.inpe.br/sibgrapi/2012/07.13.21.16?mirror=sid.inpe.br/ banon/2001/03.30.15.38.24&metadatarepository=sid.inpe.br/sibgrapi/2012/07.13.21.1 6.53. |
Quinn G.W., et al., “Performance of Face Recognition Algorithms on Compressed Images”, NIST Inter Agency Report 7830, NIST, Dec. 4, 2011, 35 pages. |
Ratha N.K., et al., “An Analysis of Minutiae Matching Strength,” Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001, 7 pages. |
Ratha, N.K., et al., “Enhancing Security and Privacy in Biometrics-Based Authentication Systems,” IBM Systems Journal, 2001, vol. 40 (3), pp. 614-634. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,504 dated Aug. 16, 2016, 11 pages. |
RFC 2560: Myers M., et al., “The Online Certificate Status Protocol, OCSP,” Network working group, Jun. 1999, RFC 2560, 22 pages. |
Roberts C., “Biometric Attack Vectors and Defences,” Sep. 2006, 25 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://otago.ourarchive.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/1243/BiometricAttackVectors.pdf. |
Rocha A., et al., “Vision of the Unseen: Current Trends and Challenges in Digital Image and Video Forensics,” ACM Computing Surveys, 2010, 47 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.wjscheirer.com/papers/wjscsur2011forensics.pdf. |
Rodrigues R.N., et al., “Robustness of Multimodal Biometric Fusion Methods Against Spoof Attacks,” Journal of Visual Language and Computing. 2009. 11 pages, doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2009.01.010; Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://cubs.buffalo.edu/govind/papers/visual09.pdf. |
Ross A., et al., “Multimodal Biometrics: An Overview,” Proceedings of 12th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Sep. 2004, pp. 1221-1224. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.csee.wvu.edu/-ross/pubs/RossMultimodaiOverview EUSIPC004.pdf. |
Schneier B., Biometrics: Uses and Abuses. Aug. 1999. Inside Risks 110 (CACM 42, Aug. 8, 1999), Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.schneier.com/essay-019.pdf, 3 pages. |
Schuckers, “Spoofing and Anti-Spoofing Measures,” Information Security Technical Report, 2002, vol. 2002, pp. 56-62. |
Schwartz et al., “Face Spoofing Detection Through Partial Least Squares and Low-Level Descriptors,” International Conference on Biometrics, 2011, vol. 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Smiatacz M., et al., Gdansk University of Technology. Liveness Measurements Using Optical Flow for Biometric Person Authentication. Metrology and Measurement Systems. 2012, vol. XIX, 2. pp. 257-268. |
Starnberger G., et al., “QR-TAN: Secure Mobile Transaction Authentication,” Availability, Reliability and Security, 2009, ARES'09, International Conference on IEEE, Mar. 16, 2009, pp. 578-585. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for Application No. 13867269, dated Aug. 3, 2016, 7 pages. |
T. Weigold et al., “The Zurich Trusted Information Channel—An Efficient Defence against Man-in-the-Middle and Malicious Software Attacks,” P. Lipp, A.R. Sadeghi, and K.M. Koch, eds., Proc. Trust Conf. (Trust 2008), LNCS 4968, Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 75-91. |
Tan et al., “Face Liveness Detection from a Single Image with Sparse Low Rank Bilinear Discriminative Model,” European Conference on Computer Vision, 2010, vol. 2010, pp. 1-14. |
TechTarget, What is network perimeter? Definition from WhatIs.com downloaded from http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/network-perimeter on Apr. 14, 2017, 5 pages. |
The Extended M2VTS Database, [Online] [Cited: Sep. 29, 2012] downloaded from http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/CVSSP/xm2vtsdb/ on Jan. 28, 2015, 1 page. |
Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/077888 dated Jul. 9, 2015, 7 pages. |
Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability from foreign counterpart PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/031344 dated Oct. 1, 2015, 9 pages. |
Tresadern P., et al., “Mobile Biometrics (MoBio): Joint Face and Voice Verification for a Mobile Platform”, 2012, 7 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personai/Norman.Poh/data/tresadem_PervComp2012draft.pdf. |
Tronci R., et al., “Fusion of Multiple Clues for Photo-Attack Detection in Face Recognition Systems,” International Joint Conference on Biometrics, 2011. pp. 1-6. |
Uludag, Umut, and Anil K. Jain. “Attacks on biometric systems: a case study in fingerprints.” Electronic Imaging 2004. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2004, 12 pages. |
Unobtrusive User-Authentication on Mobile Phones using Biometric Gait Recognition, 2010, 6 pages. |
Uymatiao M.L.T., et al., “Time-based OTP authentication via secure tunnel (TOAST); A mobile TOTP scheme using TLS seed exchange and encrypted offline keystore,” 2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology, IEEE, Apr. 26, 2014, pp. 225-229. |
Validity, OSTP Framework, 24 pages, 2010. |
Vassilev, A.T.; du Castel, B.; Ali, A.M., “Personal Brokerage of Web Service Access,” Security & Privacy, IEEE, vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 24-31, Sep.-Oct. 2007. |
WikiPedia article for Eye Tracking, 15 pages, Last Modified Jun. 21, 2014, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_tracking. |
Willis N., Linux.com. Weekend Project: Take a Tour of Open Source Eye-Tracking Software. [Online] Mar. 2, 2012. [Cited: Nov. 1, 2012.], 4 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/550880-weekend-project-take-a-tour-of-opensource-eye-tracking-software. |
Wilson R., “How to Trick Google's New Face Unlock on Android 4.1 Jelly Bean,” Aug. 6, 2012, 5 pages, [online], [retrieved Aug. 13, 2015]. Retrieved from the Internet:URL: http://printscreenmac.info/how-to-trick-android-jelly-bean-faceunlock/. |
World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Working Draft: Media Capture and Streams, 2013, 36 pages. |
Zhang, “Security Verification of Hardware-enabled Attestation Protocols,” IEEE, 2012, pp. 47-54. |
Zhao W., et al., “Face Recognition: A Literature Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, 2003, vol. 35 (4), pp. 399-458. |
Zhou, et al., “Face Recognition from Still Images and Videos”. University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Maryland : s.n., Nov. 5, 2004.pp. 1-23, Retrieved from the Internet: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=1 0.1.1.77.1312&rep=rep1 &type=pdf. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,747, dated Feb. 13, 2017, 74 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,814 dated Feb. 16, 2016, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,814 dated Jun. 14, 2016, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,814 dated Oct. 6, 2017, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,868 dated Aug. 19, 2016, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,328, dated Mar. 6, 2017, 26 pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report from foreign counterpart China Patent Application No. 201380068869.3, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 17 pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report from foreign counterpart China Patent Application No. 201480025959.9, dated Jul. 7, 2017, 10 pages. |
Grother, P.J., et al., NIST. Report on the Evaluation of 2D Still-Image Face Recognition Algorithms, NIST IR 7709. s.l, NIST, 2011, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-58. |
GSM Arena, “Ice Cream Sandwich's Face Unlock duped using a photograph,” Nov. 13, 2011, downloaded from http://www.gsmarena.com/ice_cream_sandwichs_face_unlock_duped_using_a_photograph-news-3377.php on Aug. 18, 2015, 2 pages. |
Heikkila M., et al., “A Texture-Based Method for Modeling the Background and Detecting Moving Objects”, Oulu : IEEE , Jun. 22, 2005, Draft, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ee.oulu.fi/mvg/files/pdf/pdf_662.pdf, 16 pages. |
Hernandez, T., “But What Does It All Mean? Understanding Eye-Tracking Results (Part 3)”, Sep. 4, 2007, 2 pages. EyeTools. Part III: What is a heatmap . . . really? [Online] [Cited: Nov. 1, 2012.] Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://eyetools.com/articles/p3- understanding-eye-tracking-what-is-a-heatmap-really. |
Himanshu, et al., “A Review of Face Recognition”. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Applied Sciences. Feb. 2012, vol. 2, pp. 835-846. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://euroasiapub.org/IJREAS/Feb2012/81.pdf. |
Huang L., et al., “Clickjacking: Attacks and Defenses”. S.I. : Usenix Security 2012, pp. 1-16, 2012 [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity12/sec12-final39.pdf. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/028924 dated Nov. 17, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/028927 dated Nov. 17, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/042786, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/042799, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/042870, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/050348, dated Mar. 30, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/42783, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/42827, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/028924 dated Jul. 30, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/042786, dated Oct. 16, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/042799, dated Oct. 16, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/042870, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/050348, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/42783, dated Oct. 19, 2015, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/42827, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/045534, dated Nov. 27, 2017, 14 pages. |
Jafri R., et al. “A Survey of Face Recognition Techniques,” Journal of Information Processing Systems, 2009, vol. 5 (2), pp. 41-68. |
Julian J., et al., “Biometric Enabled Portable Trusted Computing Platform,” Trust Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TRUSTCOM), 2011 IEEE 10th International Conference on Nov. 16, 2011, pp. 436-442, XP032086831, DOI:10.1109/TRUSTCOM.2011.56, ISBN: 978-1-4577-2135-9. |
Kim H.C., et al., “A Design of One-Time Password Mechanism Using Public Key Infrastructure,” Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, 2008, NCM'08, 4th International Conference on IEEE, Sep. 2, 2008, pp. 18-24. |
Kollreider K., et al., “Evaluating Liveness by Face Images and the Structure Tensor,” Halmstad, Sweden: s.n., Halmstad University, SE-30118, Sweden, [online], 2005, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.62.6534&rep=rep1 &type=pdf, pp. 75-80. |
Kollreider K., et al., “Non-Instrusive Liveness Detection by Face Images,” Image and Vision Computing, 2007, vol. 27 (3), pp. 233-244. |
Kong S., et al. “Recent Advances in Visual and Infrared Face Recognition: A Review,” Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2005, vol. 97 (1), pp. 103-135. |
Li J., et al., “Live Face Detection Based on the Analysis of Fourier Spectra,” Biometric Technology for Human Identification, 2004, pp. 296-303. |
Linux.com, “The source for Linux information,” 2012, 3 pages, downloaded from http://www.linux.com/ on Jan. 28, 2015. |
Lubin, G., et al., “16 Heatmaps That Reveal Exactly Where People Look,” Business Insider, [online], May 21, 2012, [Cited: Nov. 1, 2012], Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.businessinsider.com/eye-tracking-heatmaps-2012-5?pp=1, pp. 1-21. |
Maatta J., et al., “Face Spoofing Detection From Single Images Using Micro-Texture Analysis,” Machine Vision Group, University of Oulu, Finland, Oulu, IEEE, [online], 2011, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/mvmp/mvg/files/pdf/131.pdf., pp. 1-7. |
Marcialis G.L., et al. “First International Fingerprint Liveness Detection Competition—Livdet 2009,” Image Analysis and Processing—ICIAP, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. pp. 12-23. |
Martins R A., et al., “A Potpourri of Authentication Mechanisms the Mobile Device Way,” CISTI, Jan. 2013, pp. 843-848. |
Mobile Device Security Using Transient Authentication, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2006, vol. 5 (11), pp. 1489-1502. |
National Science & Technology Council's Subcommittee on Biometrics. Biometrics Glossary. 33 pages, Last updated Sep. 14, 2006. NSTC. http://www.biometrics.gov/documents/glossary.pdf. |
Nielsen, Jakib. useit.com. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox—Horizontal Attention Leans Left. [Online] Apr. 6, 2010. [Cited: Nov. 1, 2012.] 4 pages. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/horizontal-attention.html. |
Nielsen, Jakob. useit.com. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox—Scrolling and Attention. [Online] Mar. 22, 2010. [Cited: Nov. 1, 2012.] 6 pages. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/scrolling-attention.html. |
Niinuma K., et al., “Continuous User Authentication Using Temporal Information,” Apr. 2010, http://www.cse.msu.edu/biometrics/Publications/Face/NiinumaJain_ContinuousAuth_SPIE10.pdf, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,761 dated Feb. 27, 2014, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,761 dated Sep. 9, 2014, 36 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646, dated Dec. 31, 2018, 42 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,646, dated Mar. 7, 2018, 32 pages. |
Chen L., “Direct Anonymous Attestation,” Oct. 12, 2005, retrieved from https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/051012_DAA-slides.pdf on Apr. 2, 2018, 27 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 15786796.1, dated Oct. 23, 2018, 4 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC for European Application No. 15786487.7, dated Nov. 9, 2017, 1 page. |
Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC for European Application No. 15827363.7, dated Mar. 13, 2018, 1 page. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,452, dated Aug. 30, 2018, 17 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273, dated Feb. 8, 2018, 4 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,454, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 24 pages. |
Decision to Grant from foreign counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-550778, dated Jul. 25, 2018, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15826364.0, dated Feb. 20, 2018, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15827363.1, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15828152.7, dated Feb. 20, 2018, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15841530.7, dated Mar. 26, 2018, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,466, dated Nov. 20, 2018, 28 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,677, dated May 31, 2018, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,563, dated Dec. 27, 2018, 47 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,254, dated Aug. 23, 2018, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575 dated Sep. 5, 2018, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,611, dated May 3, 2018, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692, dated Apr. 17, 2018, 99 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,743, dated Feb. 7, 2018, 27 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,452, dated Feb. 27, 2018, 24 pages. |
Kim et al., “Secure User Authentication based on the Trusted Platform for Mobile Devices,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Sep. 29, 2016, pp. 1-15. |
Monden A., et al., “Remote Authentication Protocol,” Multimedia, Distributed, Cooperative and Mobile Symposium (DICOM02007), Information Processing Society of Japan, Jun. 29, 2007, pp. 1322-1331. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,677, dated Dec. 26, 2018, 32 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692, dated Jul. 31, 2018, 40 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,466, dated May 11, 2018, 33 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,563, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 56 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/881,522, dated Jun. 6, 2018, 87 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,620, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 66 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,575, dated Mar. 8, 2018, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,677, dated Feb. 2, 2018, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,254, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 75 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/954,188, dated Sep. 7, 2018, 41 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,454, dated Nov. 16, 2018, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from foreign counterpart Chinese Patent Application No. 201480031042.X, dated Jul. 23, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from foreign counterpart Taiwan Patent Application No. 106125986, dated Jul. 6, 2018, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,743, dated Aug. 1, 2018, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/448,814, dated May 9, 2018, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,452, dated Jul. 2, 2018, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,273, dated Jan. 18, 2018, 26 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,504, dated May 31, 2018, 95 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,692, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,328, dated Feb. 1, 2018, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,454, dated Sep. 18, 2018, 79 pages. |
Notification for Granting Patent Right and Search Report from foreign counterpart Chinese Patent Application No. 201380068869.3, dated May 4, 2018, 10 pages. |
Notification of Reason for Rejection from foreign counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-505506, dated Feb. 13, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection from foreign counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-0516743, dated Apr. 23, 2018, 12 pages. |
Oasis Standard, “Authentication Context for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0,” Mar. 15, 2005, 70 pages. |
Office Action and Search Report from foreign counterpart Taiwan Patent Application No. 106125986, dated Mar. 19, 2018, 6 pages. |
Office Action from foreign counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-550778, dated Feb. 7, 2018, 14 pages. |
“OpenID Connect Core 1.0—draft 17,” Feb. 3, 2014, 70 pages. |
Watanabe H., et al., “The Virtual Wearable Computing System Assumed Widely Movement,” the multimedia, distribution and cooperation which were taken into consideration, mobile (DICOMO2009) symposium collected-papers [CD-ROM], Japan, Information Processing Society of Japan, Jul. 1, 2009, and vol. 2009 (1), pp. 1406-1414. (Abstract only in English). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 15841530.7, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/045534, dated Feb. 14, 2019, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/062608, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 12 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection from foreign counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-505513, dated Oct. 22, 2018, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170250982 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14268733 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15595460 | US |