Web enabled business to business operating system for rental car services

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7275038
  • Patent Number
    7,275,038
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 18, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 25, 2007
    18 years ago
Abstract
An Internet enabled, business-to-business computerized transaction system is disclosed in its preferred embodiment for use in providing rental car services for high volume users and comprises an Internet web portal through which the high volume user may access an integrated business computer network for the rental vehicle service provider. The rental vehicle services provider computer network is configured to interconnect a geographically diverse plurality of branch offices, cataloguing their available rental vehicles and schedules for same as well as handling all transactional data relating to its business. The Internet web portal provides ubiquitous connectivity and portability for a multi-level business organization who regularly places high volumes of rental purchases with its business partner. Utilizing the method and apparatus of the present invention large volumes of rental transactions may be placed, monitored, altered during performance, and closed out with financial accounting and payment being made virtually without human intervention.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to the field of an Internet enabled business-to-business intelligent communication link allowing a first business organization to have intelligent interaction with a second fully integrated business organization to facilitate the placing of orders or reservations for business services or goods, with the services or goods provider having a computer network linking multiple levels of its organization to provide for the smooth conduct of business between the two organizations. More particularly, this field relates to an Internet enabled automatic rental vehicle transaction system to facilitate the conduct of rental vehicle transactions between two multilevel business organizations, one of which provides such rental vehicle transaction services in an integrated manner through business enterprise software to a high volume user of such rental vehicle services wherein an Internet web portal is defined by the rental vehicle service provider which interconnects the two business organizations at multiple levels, providing a graphical user interface (GUI) for the transaction of large amounts of rental vehicle services automatically and virtually without human intervention upon entry.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Computer technology has been embraced by many businesses in order to handle their ever increasing order flow as well as to mitigate the increasing blizzard of paper required to be produced to document this business. A significant benefit which often drives the implementation of technology is its further advantage in increasing productivity to thereby allow fewer people to handle greater volumes of business. One such good example demonstrating the efficiencies and value to be gained by implementing technology is the business model developed and followed by the assignee of the present invention. A rental car company at its heart, the assignee transacts an ever increasing number of time sensitive, relatively low dollar volume, vehicle rentals which in many instances require authorizations to be made in advance, reservations of vehicles from available geographic and vehicle type selections, monitoring of the rental as it progresses including possibly extending the rental under certain circumstances, communications between the various parties involved in the transaction to ensure ultimate customer satisfaction, and financial accounting for the transaction including generating invoices and processing them for payment. While a significant portion of the vehicle rental business involves rental for leisure, business travel, etc., another significant business relationship has developed with insurance companies and the like in what has been termed as the replacement car rental service business. In this business, a vehicle insurance company may have many thousands of policyholders who are eligible to be involved in accidents, and other dislocations of use, requiring that a vehicle be rented for that customer's use while his own vehicle be made ready again for use. Thus, for this business segment, a multi-tiered business organization such as a vehicle insurance company represents a significant customer for repetitive vehicle rental services. To conduct this business in an orderly, time efficient and cost efficient manner, it is necessary that this insurance company has as its business partner a vehicle rental company which is itself multi-tiered, such as the assignee of the present invention. This is because the needs, both geographically and in volume, are significant which require the dedication of a significant amount of resources. To satisfy these needs and to respond to other business growth, in its embrace of technology the assignee hereof has succeeded in developing an in-house computer system and related software which has integrated its business internally. This business integration has been massive and company-wide as is needed to integrate a company having a central office with literally thousands of individual branches located nationally, and even now internationally, with hundreds of thousands of vehicles available for rental. Furthermore, other business partners including other service providers such as vehicle repair shops have also been given access to this system to allow for input of information relating to progress of vehicle repair, extension of rental time, etc. as the rental progresses. This integrated business computer network and software generally includes a mainframe server at the heart of a wide area network (WAN) which facilitates the transfer of vehicle rental information and orders company-wide. This integrated business model is most efficient and needed in order to satisfy the vehicle rental service needs of a vehicle insurance company which itself may be national or even international in scope.


As a first step in extending the integration of technology into this business model, the present assignee has previously developed and implemented a computer system which has provided improved communication capabilities between the two business partners. This system generally comprised a second mainframe computer linked to the first mainframe of the integrated business network, with dedicated access lines being provided from this second mainframe to various levels of the multilevel business organization comprising the insurance company. In effect, with this additional mainframe and dedicated pipeline access, various individuals at the insurance company were permitted to directly interact with the integrated business computer network of the vehicle rental company as well as other selected service providers such as body shops where wrecked vehicles were being repaired. The implementation of this system provided a great step forward over the people intensive business activity previously required in order to handle the large number of transactions encountered in this business relationship. Historically, the replacement car market engendered large numbers of telephone calls being placed between the insurance company, the rental company, and the body shop where vehicle repair was being performed in order to authorize the rental, select and secure the desired replacement vehicle to be provided, monitor the progress of the repair work so that scheduling of the rental vehicle could be controlled, extending the vehicle rental in the event of delays in repair, authorizing various activities involved in the rental process including upgrades of vehicles or other charges for services, and subsequent billing of the rental service and processing the billing to the insurance company for payment.


While the implementation of this system was successful and represented a tremendous step forward in automating the business relationship between the insurance company and the vehicle rental company, it did have certain limitations. For example, a specific communication link had to be established between the rental vehicle company and the particular users at the insurance company designated to have access to this system. Thus, special attention and some modicum of expense was required to establish these “pipelines” and maintain them. Still another aspect to the system implemented was that it was not “browser” based nor did it provide graphical user interface (GUI) menus. Thus, each user had to be specifically trained in the particular “language” used by the system and learn to work with specific menus nested in a specific manner as well as codes for entering commands which were not similar to other computer software programs. This software design thus necessarily required additional training in order to insure that users could gain the full measure of advantage provided by the system and in order to minimize the opportunity for erroneous information or incorrect reservations from being entered or otherwise confusing the business transactions. Furthermore, user efficiency was not immediate and required skill beyond that ordinarily found in casual computer users, as we are all becoming in this computer age. Still another disadvantage to the system was that access was required to a designated entry point in the system in order for a person authorized to be on the system to work with it. As the nature of the insurance and replacement car business requires extreme mobility at multiple levels of both business partners, this represents a limitation to the usefulness and time efficiency with which various business functions could be performed. Therefore, while implementation of the second mainframe allowing for pipeline connections at various levels of the multi-tiered insurance company was a significant step forward in automating the business relationship between the two business partners, significant limitations to this solution were readily apparent to the users thereof.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors herein have succeeded in designing and developing a means for substantially enhancing the business to business communication link between these two businesses which provide significant advantages over its prior embodiment. More particularly, the inventors have succeeded in replacing the dedicated pipeline access of the existing system with a web portal allowing Internet access to the mainframe with a browser based graphical user interface (GUI) presentation. This also made the system more readily accessible to smaller business partners as the expense of the “pipeline” was eliminated. This invention offers several important technical advantages over the previous system. First of all, by taking advantage of the ubiquitous nature of the Internet, the ultimate in portability and connectivity for this system is now provided in a business environment where mobility and connectivity are at a premium. In other words, a claims adjuster, body shop, or any other business employee authorized to have access to the system may gain access at any site offering Internet access. In present day technology that includes many mobile devices and appliances which are Internet enabled. As technology advances, it is conceivable that this access will extend to permit “24/7” access by any authorized person at any geographic location. This is a marked improvement providing immediate benefit and advantage over the dedicated pipeline access of the prior art system.


A second major advantage of the present invention is its graphical user interface. The inventors have taken full advantage of this browser based GUI to streamline and organize the presentation of information to a user to actually guide him as he interacts in doing his business. One such example is customized design of the menus such that the user is guided and directed to answer only those questions required to be answered in order to conduct the particular transaction being addressed, and further to present choices to the user for his selection to minimize the need for the user to rely on his own memory or to be familiar with complicated and specialized codes to enter data or request transaction activity. With the recent and continuing explosion of the Internet, more people are becoming familiar with browser programs and their operation through their own daily activities in their personal lives. This familiarity paves the way for easier training and quicker orientation of a new user to the present invention. For large business organizations communicating at multiple levels, this significant advantage cannot be minimized as there are large numbers of people who must be continuously trained due to the growth of the organizations, as well as the inevitable attrition. Thus, the present invention provides an immediate increase in worker productivity, and makes that improved efficiency available to many more workers who are not particularly skilled other wise in computer usage.


Still another advantage provided by the present invention is through the implementation of additional functionalities which are engendered by the browser/GUI interface. As the system is continuously used, and feedback is continuously monitored and analyzed, additional features that add value through providing management information as well as by speeding transaction activity over the system may be implemented. For example, several of these features include the ability of a user to create an on demand report for transaction activity including summaries of transactions handled by a particular user or group of users which might either be open or closed. Another example of additional functionality which improves the efficiency of a user is the ability to create a repair facility call back list which allows a user to sort existing open vehicle rental reservations by repair facility (body shop) and date such that a user is presented with the list of open reservations at a particular repair facility which can be readily handled in a single telephone call while at the same time having the system on line to implement any needed changes such as extensions of reservations, etc. Additional functionality has also been provided to speed the processing of invoicing which of course also speeds their payment and cash receipts. For example, it was found that even despite the built-in error checking and correction facilities provided to the users of the system, a repetitive pattern of mistakes involving incorrect claim numbers was discovered. To speed the processing of these, an additional functionality was provided as an “electronic audit” known as invoice return which returns an invoice to a particular adjuster upon detection of an incorrect claim number for his human intervention and correction of the claim number. In this manner, problem invoices exhibiting one of the most common problems encountered may be readily handled within the system and in an efficient manner, instead of manually as before.


The present invention also has as a significant advantage the ability to be further customized to meet the individual business partners' needs and desires as well as to provide additional functionality by offering additional features which become desirable upon accumulation of user data based on user experience. Furthermore, once implemented, they are immediately available system wide.


Still another advantage of the present invention is that the graphical user interface incorporates point and click interaction, using buttons and tabs to present or conceal data for the user's attention or inattention as the case may be, and provide a much more robust interaction capability through the creation of menu designs that allow for access to the most commonly needed features from any point in the menu architecture. This is to be contrasted with the prior system which consisted of a main frame character based interface while the present invention with its GUI interface allows a user to point and click to navigate and to make selections by pull down selection, thereby reducing errors. As users become more experienced with the system, and their confidence level grows, they are much more likely to become bored and aggravated with the rigid structure of the prior system requiring them to follow along a certain menu architecture in order to complete certain tasks. On the other hand, the present invention generally increases the interest of the user in using the system. These advantages of the present invention over the prior interface promote employee productivity by allowing a user more control over his work which is critical in achieving savings in human resources to operate the system which is one of its main goals.


While the principal advantages and features of the invention have been discussed above, a greater understanding of the invention including a fuller description of its other advantages and features may be attained by referring to the drawings and the detailed description of the preferred embodiment which follow.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the computer systems comprising the invention; and



FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the software programs which communicate over the computer systems of FIG. 1 to implement the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The overall system architecture for the present invention 20 is best shown in FIG. 1. As shown therein, an insurance company computer system 22, which itself may be virtually any computer configuration or even a stand alone PC accesses the Internet 24 through any convenient access point 26 such as even including an ISP (Internet service provider), as known in the art. Also connected to the Internet 24 is a web portal 28 which is preferably provided by a server appropriately programmed as explained herein below. This web portal 28 may be appropriate configured as desired to suit any particular business relationship or arrangement, although preferably the inventors herein and assignee of this invention have determined that a 24/7 or full time connection to the Internet 24 is preferable, except for scheduled downtimes for maintenance, etc. The service provider 30 which for purposes of explaining the present preferred embodiment is preferably a vehicle rental organization, has itself an Internet portal mainframe 32 connected by a bi-directional communication link 34 to a second computer network 36 which may itself preferably have a mainframe server 38. This second computer system 36 is preferably a network having a database 40 for communication with what may be thousands of branch offices each of which has its own computer interface 44 which communicates to this second mainframe server 38 to conduct the integrated business functions of a service provider organization. Instead of communicating with the branch offices directly, a reservation may be communicated to a centralized location for further processing, such as a call center, and then relayed on to an appropriate branch office. This might be desirable under certain circumstances, such as if a branch office is closed, or when a purchaser requires some specialized service such as close monitoring of the rental. This may be done electronically and automatically, or with human intervention.


It should be noted that the particular computer configuration chosen as the preferred embodiment herein may itself be subject to wide variation. Furthermore, the term “mainframe” as used herein refers solely to a computer which can provide large scale processing of large numbers of transactions in a timely enough manner to suit the particular business application. Preferably, as is presently used by the assignee hereof, an IBM AS/400 mainframe computer is used as each of computers 32, 38. However, as is well known in the art, computer technology is subject to rapid change and it is difficult if not impossible to predict how these computer systems may evolve as technology advances in this art. For example, it is not beyond the realm of possibility that in the not so distant future a network of computers would provide the processing power to conduct these business operations as presently handled by “mainframe” computers. Thus, the term “mainframe” is not used in a limiting sense but merely to indicate that it is descriptive of a computer suited to handle the processing needs for a large scale business application.


It should also be noted that the communication link 46 extending between the server 42 and each of the branch offices 44 may have alternative configurations. For example, in some applications access over the Internet may itself be adequate, recognizing the vagaries of Internet service availability, reliability, and processing speed. Alternatively, this communication link 46 could well be a dedicated pipeline providing broadband service connection full time with back up connections to ensure continuous communication between a particular branch office or groups of branch offices and the service providers business operations computer system 36. Some branch offices might even be served through satellite links. Indeed, it is even possible that a mixture of these wide variations of service level be present within a single organization's structure depending upon communication link cost and availability balanced against service needs. It should merely be noted for present purposes that this communication link 46 serves as the electronic umbilical cord through which branch offices 44 communicate with the business computer system 36 of the present invention.


Attached hereto as exhibits are functional descriptions of the software program's resident on the computers comprising the two computer systems 32, 38 which implement the present invention. More particularly, attached hereto as Exhibit A is a functional description of the software to implement the integrated business functions resident on the AS/400 or mainframe computer 38. Attached hereto as Exhibits B and C are related flow diagrams and explanatory text, respectively, for the software resident on the mainframe AS/400 computer 32. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a functional description of the software resident on computer 32 but which also appears on the server 28 which creates the web portal for access to the mainframe 32 and its resident program. Server 28 may use a bi-directional GUI to character based interface translator program, well known to those skilled in the art, to present the displays and information obtained and transmitted between the user and the computer 32. However, the software of Exhibit D could also be run on server 28, as would be appreciated by those of skill in the art. It is believed that these functional descriptions and accompanying text as exemplified in these exhibits are adequate to enable an ordinary programmer to implement corresponding software programs for executing the preferred embodiment of the present invention using ordinary programming skills and without inventive effort.


As a further example of the flow of data and the functional advantages provided by the present invention, reference is made to FIG. 2. As shown therein, a right hand column is identified as “ECARS” which represents the integrated business software implemented as part of the mainframe operation 38 in computer network 36. The center column headed “ARMS” is resident on mainframe computer 32 and coordinates the communication of data. The left column headed “ARMS/WEB” represents the software resident on computer but which is presented on server 28 and accessible by users through the Internet. Along the left side of FIG. 2 are designated three separate sections of operational activity. These are “reservation” followed by “open” are concluded by “close”. Generally, the functional descriptions are arranged in chronological order proceeding from the top of FIG. 2 to the bottom. However, some functional features are permitted throughout the entirety of one of the three periods designated at the left side of FIG. 2. One such example is the “message” function which allows messages to be sent between users at one business organization 22 and branch offices 44 and others connected to the other business organization 30. Proceeding with a description of the transaction, the first set of communications allow for the reservation of the services. These can include requests for authorization or a rescind authorization request to be send from the service provider to the service purchaser. Correspondingly, authorizations and authorization cancels can be sent from the services purchaser to the services provider. Confirmations are communicated upon confirmation of an authorized reservation request. Authorization changes may be made and communicated from the services purchaser to the service provider. Corresponding rental transaction changes may be communicated from the services provider to the services purchaser. As indicated, through the entirety of this process messages may be sent between users and others connected or having access to the integrated business software, as desired. The consummation of this portion of the transaction is a reservation that has been placed, authorized, confirmed, and provision is made for changes as necessary. During the next phase of the transaction, a reservation is opened and services intended to be provided are started. Generally, and preferably for the rental of vehicles, a start and end date are established in the reservation process. However, along the way, transactional changes may be made, such as for changing the type of vehicle provided, extensions may be requested and entered from either business partner, messages may be transmitted between the business partners, and the transaction may be terminated such as by voiding the contract by one business partner or terminating the authority by the other business partner. The term “reservation” has been used herein to refer not only to the act of placing the order but also to filling the order for services including providing the rental vehicle to the ultimate user and even invoicing for those services.


The last phase of the process involves closing the transaction. During this phase of the transaction, the contract is indicated as being closed and invoiced, the services purchaser can approve invoices, reject invoices, and also remit invoices. Such invoice remittance may also include the actual transfer of funds through an electronic funds transfer medium, or otherwise as previously arranged between the business partners.


It should be understood that this is a streamlined description of the handling of a transaction, an by no means is exhaustive. For example, much more functionality is available to the user including accessing the data base to generate production reports regarding status of open or closed reservations, preparing action item lists to allow a user to organize and prioritize his work, obtaining information available in the system from having been entered by others which would otherwise require phone conversations which are inefficient and occupy still another person's time. A more detailed explanation of the functionality provided is found in the exhibits.


In summary, the present invention creates almost an illusion that the services purchaser, and the great number of users at various levels of the multi-tier purchaser users, are actually part of the services provider organization in that immediate online access is provided to significant data which enable the user to make reservations for services, monitor those services as they are being provided, communicate with those providing the services, obtain information relating to the status of services as they are being provided, and close transactions, all by interacting with the services provider business organization over that user's PC and without human interaction required by the business providers personnel. By way of contra-distinction, for many years business has been conducted on a human level by customers picking up the telephone and calling services providers and talking to their human counterparts in order to convey information, place orders, monitor orders, including obtaining information as to status, canceling orders, questioning invoices and paying invoices, along with a myriad of other related interactions. Not only did the conduct of business in this manner entail significant amounts of human resources at both ends of the transaction, but it also led to inefficiencies, mistakes and delays all of which increase the cost of doing business and contribute to an increased risk of services being rendered in an unsatisfactory manner in many instances to the end user. The present invention has taken the preexisting solution of providing electronic communication between the business partners to another level by “web enabling” this system for improved connectivity, improved usability, reduced training, enhanced mobility, and other advantages as described herein.


Various changes and modifications to the preferred embodiment as explained herein would be envisioned by those of skill in the art. Examples of these changes and modifications include the utilization of computer systems configured in any one of a myriad of ways using present technology alone. For example, mobile computers are presently available and wireless technology could be used to extend the integrated business network of the services provider, as well as match the mobility needed by the various users connected to and using the present invention. The particular software, and various aspects and features of its design, have been adapted for particular application to the vehicle rental business. Of course, computer software applications satisfying other business needs would necessarily require adaptation to their particular business models. Thus, it is envisioned by the inventors herein that the various software programs described herein would be matched to the particular business application to which the invention is utilized. These and other aspects of the preferred embodiment should not be viewed as limiting and instead be considered merely as illustrative of an example of the practical implementation of the present invention. These changes and modifications should be considered as part of the invention and the invention should be considered as limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto and their legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An Internet enabled automatic rental vehicle transaction system, said system having an internet web portal through which a third party authorized purchaser of rental vehicle services for use by another may access, for bi-directional communication and functional interaction, a rental vehicle services provider using a digital data entry device connected to the internet, a rental vehicle software program resident on a computer system remote from said third party authorized purchaser, said rental vehicle software program being configured to automatically respond to a series of commands from said third party authorized purchaser and communicate a plurality of rental vehicle reservations through said rental vehicle software program to a second software program for fulfillment at a specific geographically remote rental vehicle location at which vehicles for rent are situated, each of said reservations including an identification of an associated repair facility where a vehicle of said another is undergoing repairs and wherein said reservations have a plurality of associated repair facilities, said rental vehicle software program collecting data relating to said plurality of reservations into a database accessible by said third party authorized purchaser and being further configured for managing of said reservations by said third party authorized purchaser including automatically generating repair facility call back lists authorizing said reservations, processing said reservations, and billing said reservations to said third party authorized purchaser so that said plurality of rental vehicle reservations may be automatically processed thereby, the repair facility call back lists being configured to allow said third party authorized purchaser to sort said reservations tat are open by at least the associated repair facilities wherein said list groups together the open reservations by one or more associated repair facilities.
  • 2. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 1 wherein said third party authorized purchaser comprises a business organization, said business organization having a plurality of authorized purchasers, said plurality of authorized purchasers each being enabled to access said internet web portal from any location offering internet web access, and further comprising a second business organization, said second business organization having the computer system arid rental vehicle software program resident therein.
  • 3. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 2 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit a rental vehicle reservation to be initiated remote from said third party authorized purchaser and communicated to said third party authorized purchaser for authorization.
  • 4. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 3 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit said authorized purchasers to modify said rental vehicle reservation through said internet web portal.
  • 5. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 4 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit said authorized purchasers to modify said rental vehicle reservation including extending a time period for which said reservation authorizes use of a rental vehicle.
  • 6. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 4 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit said authorized purchaser to generate reports relating to rental vehicle reservation activity conducted through said rental vehicle software program including reports summarizing rental vehicle reservation activity conducted by any one of said authorized purchasers.
  • 7. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 6 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to automatically communicate billing information to said third party authorized purchaser for further processing.
  • 8. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 7 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to communicate messages between each of said authorized purchaser and any others having access to said rental vehicle software program.
  • 9. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 8 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured for allowing access through its internet web portal to a plurality of service providers, and for limiting the functionality available to any one of said plurality of service providers.
  • 10. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 9 wherein said plurality of service providers include vehicle repair facilities.
  • 11. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 1 further comprising a second computer system, said second computer system having the second computer software program resident thereon, said second computer software program being configured to process rental vehicle transactions at a plurality of geographically diverse branch facilities each of which has a plurality of vehicles for rental, said second computer system being linked to said first computer system whereat said rental vehicle software program is resident.
  • 12. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 11 wherein each of said first and second computer systems comprises a network having a main frame computer, said main frame computers being linked to each other, and wherein said second computer system further comprises a WAN.
  • 13. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 12 wherein said third party authorized purchaser comprises a business organization, said business organization having a plurality of individual authorized purchasers, said plurality of individual authorized purchasers being enabled to access said internet web portal from any location offering internet web access, and further comprising a second business organization, said second business organization having the second computer system resident therein, and wherein said second business organization includes the plurality of geographically diverse rental vehicle locations.
  • 14. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 13 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit a rental vehicle reservation to be initiated remote from said third party authorized purchaser and communicated to said third party authorized purchaser for authorization.
  • 15. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 14 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit said authorized purchasers to modify said rental vehicle reservation through said internet web portal.
  • 16. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 15 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit said authorized purchasers to modify said rental vehicle reservation including extending a tine period for which said reservation authorizes use of a rental vehicle.
  • 17. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 15 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to permit said authorized purchaser to generate reports relating to rental vehicle reservation activity conducted through said rental vehicle software program.
  • 18. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 17 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to automatically communicate billing information to said authorized purchaser for further processing.
  • 19. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 18 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured to communicate messages between said authorized purchaser and any others having access to said rental vehicle software program.
  • 20. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 19 wherein said rental vehicle software program is configured for allowing access though its Internet web portal to a plurality of Service providers, and for limiting the functionality available to any one of said plurality of service providers.
  • 21. The rental vehicle transaction system of claim 20 wherein said plurality of service providers include vehicle repair facilities.
  • 22. An Internet-enabled automatic rental vehicle transaction system, the system comprising: a first computer network operated by a rental vehicle service provider, the first computer network comprising a plurality of branch office computers located in a plurality of geographically remote locations at which a plurality of rental vehicles are available for rent from the rental vehicle service provider, a database in which reservation data regarding the rental vehicles available for rent at the plurality of remote locations is stored, and a first computer network mainframe in bidirectional communication with the database and the branch office computers, the first computer network mainframe being configured to execute a fulfillment software program, the fulfillment software program being configured to process and store rental vehicle reservation data in the database for access by the branch office computers when the branch office computers fulfill rental vehicle reservations; anda second computer network comprising a plurality of authorized business partner computers, a second computer network mainframe, and a web portal;wherein the second computer network mainframe is in bidirectional communication with the first computer network, the second computer network mainframe being configured to execute a rental vehicle software program, the rental vehicle software program being configured to access the database to create and manage rental vehicle reservations in response to a series of commands received from the authorized business partner computers;wherein the web portal is in bidirectional communication with the second computer network mainframe and further in bidirectional communication with the authorized business partner computers via an Internet connection therebetween, the web portal being configured to provide a plurality of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for display on the authorized business partner computers, the GUIs being configured to interface a user of an authorized business partner computer with the rental vehicle software program;wherein the authorized business partner computers are configured to access the rental vehicle software program via the Internet connection to the web portal's GUIs, thereby providing users of the authorized business partner computers with the ability to provide the series of commands to the rental vehicle software program for creating and managing rental vehicle reservations on behalf of third parties;wherein the rental vehicle software program is further configured to access the database to generate, in response to input from a user of an authorized business partner computer, a report for display on the user's authorized business partner computer via at least one web portal GUI, the report being configured to detail a plurality of rental vehicle reservations, the user input being received by the rental vehicle software program through at least one web portal GUI, the report being sortable by a criteria specified by the authorized business partner computer user through at least one web portal GUI;wherein a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations correspond to open rental vehicle reservations for third parties whose vehicles are undergoing repairs at a repair facility;wherein the database is configured to store, as part of the data corresponding to a rental vehicle reservation, data identifying the repair facilities where the third parties′ vehicles are undergoing repairs; andwherein the report displays data about a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations, the displayed data including the data identifying the repair facility corresponding to the open rental vehicle reservations, andwherein the user-specified sorting criteria comprises a “by repair facility” criteria.
  • 23. The system of claim 22 wherein a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations have a stored number of authorized days therefor; wherein the database is configured to store, as part of the data corresponding to a rental vehicle reservation, the authorized number of days for that reservation, andwherein the report displays data about a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations, the displayed data including the authorized number of days for the open rental vehicle reservations, andwherein the user-specified sorting criteria comprises a “by authorized number of days” criteria.
  • 24. The system of claim 22 wherein a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations have a stored number of authorized days therefor, wherein the database is configured to store, as part of the data corresponding to a rental vehicle reservation, the authorized number of days for that reservation; andwherein the report displays data about a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations, the displayed data including a number of days behind for open rental vehicle reservations that have been open for more than the authorized number of days, the number of days behind being a difference between the number of authorized days for an open rental vehicle reservation and a number of days that tat rental vehicle reservation has been open, andwherein the user-specified sorting criteria comprises a “by days behind” criteria.
  • 25. The system of claim 22 wherein the rental vehicle reservations comprise insurance replacement rental vehicle reservations.
  • 26. An Internet-enabled automatic rental vehicle transaction system, the system comprising: a first computer network operated by a rental vehicle service provider, the first computer network comprising a plurality of branch office computers located in a plurality of geographically remote locations at which a plurality of rental vehicles are available for rent from the rental vehicle service provider, a database in which reservation data regarding the rental vehicles available for rent at the plurality of remote locations is stored, and a first computer network mainframe in bidirectional communication with the database and the branch office computers, the first computer network mainframe being configured to execute a fulfillment software program, the fulfillment software program being configured to process and store rental vehicle reservation data in the database for access by the branch office computers when the branch office computers fulfill rental vehicle reservations; anda second computer network comprising a plurality of authorized business partner computers, a second computer network mainframe, and a web portal;wherein the second computer network mainframe is in bidirectional communication with the first computer network, the second computer network mainframe being configured to execute a rental vehicle software program, the rental vehicle software program being configured to access the database to create and manage rental vehicle reservations in response to a series of commands received from the authorized business partner computers;wherein the web portal is in bidirectional communication with the second computer network mainframe and is farther in bidirectional communication with the authorized business partner computers via an Internet connection therebetween, the web portal being configured to provide a plurality of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for display on the authorized business partner computers, the GUIs being configured to interface a user of an authorized business partner computer with the rental vehicle software program,wherein the authorized business partner computers are configured to access the rental vehicle software program via the Internet connection to the web portal's GUIs, thereby providing users of the authorized business partner computers with the ability to provide the series of commands to the rental vehicle software program for creating and managing rental vehicle reservations on behalf of third parties,wherein a plurality of the rental vehicle reservations correspond to rental vehicle reservations for third parties whose vehicles are undergoing repairs at a repair facility,wherein the database is configured to store, as part of the data corresponding to a rental vehicle reservation, data identifying the repair facility where the third party's vehicle is undergoing repairs; andwherein the rental vehicle software program is further configured to access the database to generate a list for display on the user's authorized business partner computer via at least one web portal GUI, the list grouping a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations by their corresponding stored repair facility data such that open rental vehicle reservations having a common corresponding stared repair facility are commonly-grouped.
  • 27. The system of claim 26 wherein the rental vehicle software program is further configured to generate the list in response to input from a user of an authorized business partner computer, the input being received by the rental vehicle software program through at least one web portal GUI, and the input including a request that the list group the plurality of open rental vehicle reservations by repair facility.
  • 28. The system of claim 27 wherein the list includes a telephone number for each repair facility that is included thereon.
  • 29. The system of claim 28 wherein the open rental vehicle reservations on the list are user-selectable to cause the web portal to display at least one GUI on the user's authorized business partner computer that is configured to receive user action on the user-selected open rental vehicle reservation, the user action to be communicated to the fulfillment software for processing thereof and storage in the database, the user action including a rental vehicle reservation extension.
  • 30. A method for conducting a plurality of rental vehicle transactions between a rental vehicle service provider and a plurality of authorized business partners, the method comprising: providing a plurality of branch office computers located in a plurality of geographically remote locations at which a plurality of rental vehicles are available for rent from the rental vehicle service provider;providing a database in which reservation data regarding the rental vehicles available for rent at the plurality of remote locations is stored,storing repair facility data in the database for rental vehicle reservations to identify a plurality of repair facilities at which renters′ vehicles are undergoing repairs;providing a first mainframe in bidirectional communication with the database and the branch office computers, the first mainframe having fulfillment software resident thereon, the fulfillment software being configured to process and store rental vehicle reservation data in the database for access by the branch office computers when the branch office computers fulfill rental vehicle reservations;providing a second mainframe, wherein the second mainframe is in bidirectional communication with the first computer network, the second mainframe having a rental vehicle software program resident thereon, the rental vehicle software program being configured to, upon execution, access the database to manage rental vehicle reservations in response to a series of commands received from a plurality of authorized business partner computersproviding a web portal, wherein the web portal is in bidirectional communication with the second mainframe and is further in bidirectional communication with the authorized business partner computers via an Internet connection therebetween, the web portal being configured to provide a plurality of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for display on the authorized business partner computers, the GUIs being configured to interface a user of an authorized business partner computer with the rental vehicle software program resident on the second mainframe such that the user can provide the series of commands for managing rental vehicle reservations;receiving a command via at least one of the web portal GUIs from a user's authorized business partner computer;communicating the received command to the rental software program;executing the rental vehicle software program in response to the communicated command to thereby manage a rental vehicle reservation; andresponsive to the executing step, displaying a web portal GUI on the authorized business partner computer, wherein the displayed web portal GUI includes a repair facility callback list for a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations.
  • 31. The method of claim 30 further comprising: displaying the web portal repair facility callback list GUI on the authorized business partner computer in response to a command received from the user of the authorized business partner computer, the command comprising a request to display a plurality of open rental vehicle reservations that are sorted by repair facility.
  • 32. The method of claim 31 wherein the repair facility callback list is configured to display a telephone number for each repair facility.
  • 33. The method of claim 32 further comprising: receiving a command from the user's authorized business partner computer via the web portal repair facility callback list GUI, the command corresponding to a selection of an open rental vehicle reservation that is displayed on the repair facility callback list;responsive to the command received via the web portal repair facility callback list GUI, displaying, on the authorized business partner computer, a web portal GUI tat is configured to receive a user command regarding an action to be taken on the selected open rental vehicle reservation, the user action comprising an extension of the selected open rental vehicle reservation.
  • 34. The method of claim 32 further comprising: displaying a web portal GUI on the authorized business partner computer from which the user can provide a command for the rental vehicle software program to generate a report on a plurality of rental vehicle reservations, the report comprising a plurality of fields that detail the plurality of rental vehicle reservations, the command including a command to sort the rental vehicle reservations that are displayed in the report by a user-specified criteria; andresponsive to the report generating command, displaying the report on the user's authorized business partner computer via a web portal GUI.
  • 35. The method of claim 34 further comprising: storing repair facility data in the database for rental vehicle reservations for which a renter's vehicle is undergoing repairs;wherein the report includes a field for identifying the repair facility corresponding to the plurality of rental vehicle reservations listed therein, and wherein the report generating command includes a “sort by repair facility” command.
  • 36. The method of claim 34 further comprising: storing in the database a number of authorized days for a plurality of rental vehicle reservations, andwherein the report includes a field for identifying the authorized number of days stored for the plurality of rental vehicle reservations listed therein, and wherein the report generating command includes a “sort by authorized number of days” command.
  • 37. The method of claim 34 further comprising: storing in the database a number of authorized days for a plurality of rental vehicle reservations, andwherein the report includes a field for identifying a number of days behind for rental vehicle reservations that have been open for more than the authorized number of days, the number of days behind being a difference between the number of authorized days for a rental vehicle reservation and a number of days that that rental vehicle reservation has been open, and wherein the report generating command includes a “son by days behind” command.
  • 38. The method of claim 30 wherein the plurality of branch office computers, the database, the first mainframe, and the second mainframe ate all maintained and operated by the rental vehicle service provider.
  • 39. The method of claim 38 wherein the web portal is maintained and operated by the rental vehicle service provider.
  • 40. The method of claim 30 wherein the web portal is maintained and operated by the rental vehicle service provider.
  • 41. The method of claim 30 wherein the rental vehicle software program comprises a legacy rental vehicle software program.
  • 42. An automatic rental vehicle transaction system, the system comprising: a first computer network operated by a rental vehicle service provider, the first Computer network comprising a plurality of branch office computers located in a plurality of geographically remote locations at which a plurality of rental vehicles are available for rent from the rental vehicle service provider, a database in which reservation data regarding the rental vehicles available for rent at the plurality of remote locations is stored, at least a portion of the reservation data corresponding to rental vehicle reservations for third parties whose vehicles are undergoing repairs at a repair facility, the stored reservation data including data identifying the repair facilities where the third parties′ vehicles are undergoing repairs, and a first computer network mainframe in bidirectional communication with the database and the branch office computers, the first computer network mainframe having fulfillment software resident thereon, the fulfillment software being configured to process and store rental vehicle reservation data in the database for access by the branch office computers when the branch office computers fulfill rental vehicle reservations; anda second computer network comprising a plurality of authorized business partner computers and a second computer network mainframe;wherein the second computer network mainframe is in bidirectional communication with the first computer network, the second computer network mainframe having a rental vehicle software program resident thereon, the rental vehicle software program being configured to access the database to create and manage rental vehicle reservations in response to a series of commands received from the authorized business partner computers;wherein the authorized business partner computers are configured to access the rental vehicle software program via an electronic connection, thereby providing users of the authorized business partner computers with the ability to create and manage rental vehicle reservations on behalf of third parties, including the ability to generate a report for display on the authorized business partner computers the report comprising details about the plurality of rental vehicle reservations including sorted data therefor that identifies at least one selected from the group consisting of (1) the repair facilities where the third parties′ vehicles are undergoing repairs, (2) the authorized number of days for the plurality of rental vehicle reservations, and (3) the number of days behind for rental vehicle reservations that have been open for more than the authorized number of days, the number of days behind being calculated as a difference between the number of authorized days for an open rental vehicle reservation and a number of days that that rental vehicle reservation has been open.
  • 43. The system of claim 42 wherein the report comprises details about the plurality of rental vehicle reservations including sorted data therefor that identifies the repair facilities where the third parties′ vehicles are undergoing repairs.
  • 44. The system of claim 42 wherein the report comprises details about the plurality of rental vehicle reservations including sorted data therefor that identifies the authorized number of days for the plurality of rental vehicle reservations.
  • 45. The system of claim 42 wherein the report comprises details about the plurality of rental vehicle reservations including sorted data therefor that identifies the number of days behind for rental vehicle reservations that have been open for more than the authorized number of days, the number of days behind being calculated as a difference between the number of authorized days for an open rental vehicle reservation and a number of days that that rental vehicle reservation has been open.
  • 46. The system of claim 42 wherein the rental vehicle reservations included in the report are limited to open rental vehicle reservations.
US Referenced Citations (364)
Number Name Date Kind
4714989 Billings Dec 1987 A
4757267 Riskin Jul 1988 A
4774663 Musmanno et al. Sep 1988 A
4788643 Trippe et al. Nov 1988 A
4797818 Cotter Jan 1989 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4831526 Luchs et al. May 1989 A
4858121 Barber et al. Aug 1989 A
4891785 Donohoo Jan 1990 A
4897867 Foster et al. Jan 1990 A
4916611 Doyle, Jr. et al. Apr 1990 A
4931932 Dalnekoff et al. Jun 1990 A
4951196 Jackson Aug 1990 A
4984155 Geier et al. Jan 1991 A
5058044 Stewart et al. Oct 1991 A
5063506 Brockwell et al. Nov 1991 A
5210687 Wolfberg et al. May 1993 A
5216592 Mann et al. Jun 1993 A
5218697 Chung Jun 1993 A
5224034 Katz et al. Jun 1993 A
5237499 Garback Aug 1993 A
5253165 Leiseca et al. Oct 1993 A
5270922 Higgins Dec 1993 A
5289369 Hirshberg Feb 1994 A
5309355 Lockwood May 1994 A
5311425 Inada May 1994 A
5319542 King, Jr. et al. Jun 1994 A
5355474 Thuraisngham et al. Oct 1994 A
5361199 Shoquist et al. Nov 1994 A
5369570 Parad Nov 1994 A
5375207 Blakely et al. Dec 1994 A
5390314 Swanson Feb 1995 A
5396600 Thompson et al. Mar 1995 A
5406475 Kouchi et al. Apr 1995 A
5422809 Griffin et al. Jun 1995 A
5432904 Wong Jul 1995 A
5465206 Hilt et al. Nov 1995 A
5471615 Amatsu et al. Nov 1995 A
5475585 Bush Dec 1995 A
5504674 Chen et al. Apr 1996 A
5506897 Moore et al. Apr 1996 A
5515268 Yoda May 1996 A
5528490 Hill Jun 1996 A
5530844 Phillips et al. Jun 1996 A
5544040 Gerbaulet Aug 1996 A
5544320 Konrad Aug 1996 A
5550734 Tarter et al. Aug 1996 A
5557518 Rosen Sep 1996 A
5570283 Shoolery et al. Oct 1996 A
5581461 Coll et al. Dec 1996 A
5586313 Schnittker et al. Dec 1996 A
5588048 Neville Dec 1996 A
5592375 Salmon et al. Jan 1997 A
5592378 Cameron et al. Jan 1997 A
5640505 Hearn et al. Jun 1997 A
5644721 Chung et al. Jul 1997 A
5664207 Crumpler et al. Sep 1997 A
5666493 Wojcik et al. Sep 1997 A
5694551 Doyle et al. Dec 1997 A
5696901 Konrad Dec 1997 A
5696965 Dedrick Dec 1997 A
5710887 Chelliah et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5712989 Johnson et al. Jan 1998 A
5721832 Westrope et al. Feb 1998 A
5721913 Ackroff et al. Feb 1998 A
5724520 Goheen Mar 1998 A
5726885 Klein et al. Mar 1998 A
5732398 Tagawa Mar 1998 A
5734823 Saigh et al. Mar 1998 A
5754772 Leaf May 1998 A
5754830 Butts et al. May 1998 A
5757925 Faybishenko May 1998 A
5758329 Wojcik et al. May 1998 A
5758341 Voss May 1998 A
5764981 Brice et al. Jun 1998 A
5768510 Gish Jun 1998 A
5768511 Galvin et al. Jun 1998 A
5774873 Berent et al. Jun 1998 A
5778178 Arunachalam Jul 1998 A
5781892 Hunt et al. Jul 1998 A
5784565 Lewine Jul 1998 A
5793966 Amstein et al. Aug 1998 A
5794207 Walker et al. Aug 1998 A
5796634 Craport et al. Aug 1998 A
5796967 Filepp et al. Aug 1998 A
5797126 Helbling et al. Aug 1998 A
5799157 Escallon Aug 1998 A
5799289 Fukushima et al. Aug 1998 A
5802293 van der Sijpt Sep 1998 A
5802530 Van Hoff Sep 1998 A
5805689 Neville Sep 1998 A
5805829 Cohen et al. Sep 1998 A
5808894 Wiens et al. Sep 1998 A
5809478 Greco et al. Sep 1998 A
5818715 Marshall et al. Oct 1998 A
5819274 Jackson, Jr. Oct 1998 A
5832451 Flake et al. Nov 1998 A
5832452 Schneider et al. Nov 1998 A
5832454 Jafri et al. Nov 1998 A
5835724 Smith Nov 1998 A
5838910 Domenikos et al. Nov 1998 A
5838916 Domenikos et al. Nov 1998 A
5839112 Schreitmueller et al. Nov 1998 A
5839114 Lynch et al. Nov 1998 A
5842176 Hunt et al. Nov 1998 A
5847957 Cohen et al. Dec 1998 A
5848131 Shaffer et al. Dec 1998 A
5848241 Misinai et al. Dec 1998 A
5850446 Berger et al. Dec 1998 A
5857191 Blackwell, Jr. et al. Jan 1999 A
5862346 Kley et al. Jan 1999 A
5864818 Feldman Jan 1999 A
5864827 Wilson Jan 1999 A
RE36111 Neville Feb 1999 E
5870719 Maritzen et al. Feb 1999 A
5870733 Bass et al. Feb 1999 A
5875110 Jacobs Feb 1999 A
5877765 Dickman et al. Mar 1999 A
5881230 Christensen et al. Mar 1999 A
5889863 Weber Mar 1999 A
5889942 Orenshteyn Mar 1999 A
5890129 Spurgeon Mar 1999 A
5890140 Clark et al. Mar 1999 A
5892905 Brandt et al. Apr 1999 A
5893904 Harris et al. Apr 1999 A
5897620 Walker et al. Apr 1999 A
5898835 Truong Apr 1999 A
5901214 Shaffer et al. May 1999 A
5903873 Peterson et al. May 1999 A
5907608 Shaffer et al. May 1999 A
5909542 Paquette et al. Jun 1999 A
5909570 Webber Jun 1999 A
5910982 Shaffer et al. Jun 1999 A
5915241 Giannini Jun 1999 A
5918215 Yoshioka et al. Jun 1999 A
5920696 Brandt et al. Jul 1999 A
5923552 Brown et al. Jul 1999 A
5926793 de Rafael et al. Jul 1999 A
5926798 Carter Jul 1999 A
5930474 Dunworth et al. Jul 1999 A
5931917 Nguyen et al. Aug 1999 A
5933810 Okawa Aug 1999 A
5944784 Simonoff et al. Aug 1999 A
5946660 McCarty et al. Aug 1999 A
5946687 Gehani et al. Aug 1999 A
5948040 DeLorme et al. Sep 1999 A
5950169 Borghesi et al. Sep 1999 A
5953706 Patel Sep 1999 A
5956397 Shaffer et al. Sep 1999 A
5956487 Venkatraman et al. Sep 1999 A
5956509 Kevner Sep 1999 A
5961569 Craport et al. Oct 1999 A
5961572 Craport et al. Oct 1999 A
5963915 Kirsch Oct 1999 A
5966451 Utsumi Oct 1999 A
5970475 Barnes et al. Oct 1999 A
5973619 Paredes Oct 1999 A
5974444 Konrad Oct 1999 A
5977966 Bogdan Nov 1999 A
5978577 Rierden et al. Nov 1999 A
5978747 Craport et al. Nov 1999 A
5978817 Giannandrea et al. Nov 1999 A
5978834 Simonoff et al. Nov 1999 A
5978840 Nguyen et al. Nov 1999 A
5982867 Urban et al. Nov 1999 A
5982868 Shaffer et al. Nov 1999 A
5983200 Slotznick Nov 1999 A
5983208 Haller et al. Nov 1999 A
5987423 Arnold et al. Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
5995939 Berman et al. Nov 1999 A
5996017 Cipiere Nov 1999 A
6002767 Kramer Dec 1999 A
6005568 Simonoff et al. Dec 1999 A
6006148 Strong Dec 1999 A
6006201 Berent et al. Dec 1999 A
6009464 Hamilton et al. Dec 1999 A
6012083 Savitzky et al. Jan 2000 A
6014673 Davis et al. Jan 2000 A
6014702 King et al. Jan 2000 A
6016496 Roberson Jan 2000 A
6018627 Iyengar et al. Jan 2000 A
6021406 Kuznetsov Feb 2000 A
6023679 Acebo et al. Feb 2000 A
6026379 Haller et al. Feb 2000 A
6031533 Peddada et al. Feb 2000 A
6043815 Simonoff et al. Mar 2000 A
6044382 Martino Mar 2000 A
6049774 Roy Apr 2000 A
6049832 Brim et al. Apr 2000 A
6054983 Simonoff et al. Apr 2000 A
6058179 Shaffer et al. May 2000 A
6058378 Clark et al. May 2000 A
6061665 Bahreman May 2000 A
6061691 Fox May 2000 A
6064973 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6070142 McDonough et al. May 2000 A
6072870 Nguyen et al. Jun 2000 A
6073163 Clark et al. Jun 2000 A
6076067 Jacobs et al. Jun 2000 A
6078321 Simonoff et al. Jun 2000 A
6078322 Simonoff et al. Jun 2000 A
6084585 Kraft et al. Jul 2000 A
6085169 Walker et al. Jul 2000 A
6085170 Tsukuda Jul 2000 A
6088677 Spurgeon Jul 2000 A
6091409 Dickman et al. Jul 2000 A
6091412 Simonoff et al. Jul 2000 A
6091810 Shaffer et al. Jul 2000 A
6094640 Goheen Jul 2000 A
6097802 Fleischer, III et al. Aug 2000 A
6101496 Esposito Aug 2000 A
6108650 Musk et al. Aug 2000 A
6112185 Walker et al. Aug 2000 A
6119105 Williams Sep 2000 A
6119149 Notani Sep 2000 A
6122642 Mehovic Sep 2000 A
6125384 Brandt et al. Sep 2000 A
6125391 Meltzer et al. Sep 2000 A
6144944 Kurtzman, II et al. Nov 2000 A
6144990 Brandt et al. Nov 2000 A
6148289 Virdy Nov 2000 A
6148290 Dan et al. Nov 2000 A
6154172 Piccionelli et al. Nov 2000 A
6163772 Kramer et al. Dec 2000 A
6175832 Luzzi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178409 Weber et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185290 Shaffer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189003 Leal Feb 2001 B1
6192415 Haverstock et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205482 Navarre et al. Mar 2001 B1
6223094 Muehleck et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226654 Van Hoff May 2001 B1
6226675 Meltzer et al. May 2001 B1
6229534 Gerra et al. May 2001 B1
6230117 Lymer et al. May 2001 B1
6233329 Urban et al. May 2001 B1
6233609 Mittal May 2001 B1
6240365 Bunn May 2001 B1
6253188 Witek et al. Jun 2001 B1
6272528 Cullen et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272675 Schrab et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275843 Chorn Aug 2001 B1
6282489 Bellesfield et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282517 Wolfe et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282568 Sondur et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286028 Cohen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292185 Ko et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304892 Bhoj et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308120 Good Oct 2001 B1
6308160 Rex Oct 2001 B1
6311207 Mighdoll et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311213 Dawson et al. Oct 2001 B2
6324568 Diec Nov 2001 B1
6327574 Kramer et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332163 Bowman-Amuah Dec 2001 B1
6334146 Parasnis et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336100 Yamada Jan 2002 B1
6339773 Rishe Jan 2002 B1
6343290 Cossins et al. Jan 2002 B1
6351738 Clark Feb 2002 B1
6363388 Sprenger et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370523 Anderson Apr 2002 B1
6381324 Shaffer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381603 Chan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385312 Shaffer et al. May 2002 B1
6393415 Getchius et al. May 2002 B1
6393471 Kobata May 2002 B1
6397191 Notani et al. May 2002 B1
6397208 Lee May 2002 B1
6397219 Mills May 2002 B2
6401094 Stemp et al. Jun 2002 B1
6418400 Webber Jul 2002 B1
6477452 Good Nov 2002 B2
6542912 Meltzer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6567783 Notani et al. May 2003 B1
20010005831 Lewin et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010008998 Tamaki et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010010058 Mittal Jul 2001 A1
20010011222 McLauchlin et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010011246 Tammaro Aug 2001 A1
20010014907 Brebner Aug 2001 A1
20010016825 Pugliese, III et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010016868 Nakamura et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018661 Sato et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010021912 DeMarcken et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010027420 Boublik et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010027483 Gupta et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010029459 Fujiwara Oct 2001 A1
20010032113 Rudnick Oct 2001 A1
20010032273 Cheng Oct 2001 A1
20010037224 Eldridge et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037255 Tambay et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037298 Ehrman et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037331 Lloyd Nov 2001 A1
20010044811 Ballantyne et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010056361 Sendouda Dec 2001 A1
20020004796 Vange et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007289 Malin et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010781 Tuatini Jan 2002 A1
20020019821 Rosenbluth Feb 2002 A1
20020022979 Whipp et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026337 Sasaki Feb 2002 A1
20020032626 DeWolf et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032790 Linderman Mar 2002 A1
20020035488 Aquila et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040352 McCormick Apr 2002 A1
20020042843 Diec Apr 2002 A1
20020042849 Ho et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046213 Vinati et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046294 Brodsky et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046301 Shannon et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049603 Mehra et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020062262 Vasconi et al. May 2002 A1
20020069123 Soderlind et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072937 Domenick et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072938 Black et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073236 Helgeson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020076029 Shaffer et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082912 Batachia et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083095 Wu et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083099 Knauss et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091533 Ims et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095319 Swart et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099562 Bruce, Sr, et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099613 Swart et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099735 Schroeder et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099738 Grant Jul 2002 A1
20020106069 Shaffer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107918 Shaffer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111876 Rudraraju et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116205 Ankireddipally et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116454 Dyla et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120459 Dick et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120776 Eggebraaten et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020129021 Brown Sep 2002 A1
20020133359 Brown Sep 2002 A1
20020133517 Carlson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020136381 Shaffer et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143644 Tosun et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152100 Chen et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156693 Stewart et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156865 Rajarajan et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169842 Christensen et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178087 Henderson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184054 Cox et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184266 Blessin Dec 2002 A1
20020188761 Chikirivao et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194219 Bradley et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198743 Ariathurai et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004822 Shorter et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009545 Sahai et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014270 Qureshi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014295 Brookes et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018666 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023450 Casati et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028404 Herron et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028533 Bata et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036917 Hite et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036966 Amra et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041180 Schlussman Feb 2003 A1
20030114967 Good Jun 2003 A1
20030149600 Williams Aug 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
2002074126 Sep 2000 JP
02001344490 Dec 2001 JP
WO 9966738 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0197072 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0229675 Apr 2002 WO