A Uniform Resource Locator (or URL) is a text string identifier that uniquely identifies a resource on the web. As an example, URLs can identify web sites. URLs of web sites are commonly input into a web browser to cause the browser to navigate to the respective web site. In addition, URLs are often associated with selectable links (often called “hyperlinks”) within a web site. Selection of a hyperlink causes the browser to navigate to the web site identified by the URL associated with the hyperlink.
URLs can be used in other ways as well. For example, a URL can be input into a chat window, which can potentially cause the system to render a limited preview of the web site. As an example, the preview might include an image, limited text, and perhaps a hyperlink that, when selected, allows for navigation to the web site associated with the link. This gives the user a better idea of what the web site offers as compared to simply presenting only the text of the URL. Thus, the user knows a little more about the web site to allow the user to make a more informed decision on whether to select the hyperlink. Once the user selects the hyperlink and has navigated to the web site, the user can then navigate through the web site (e.g., by selecting hyperlinks or controls) to perform various actions while at the web site.
As an example, the user might navigate to a web site that offers products for sale, and then thereafter perform actions to purchase a product. As another example, the user might navigate to a web site that is promoting an event, and thereafter select hyperlinks or controls to find out more about the event, buy tickets for the event, or find out where on a map the event is. As yet another example, the user might navigate to a restaurant web site, and thereafter view a menu, or make reservations.
The subject matter claimed herein is not limited to embodiments that solve any disadvantages or that operate only in environments such as those described above. Rather, this background is only provided to illustrate one exemplary technology area where some embodiments describe herein may be practiced.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Some embodiments described herein relate to the generation of a web site preview based on client presentation state of the client computing system(s) that will render the web site preview. In accordance with one embodiment described herein, upon a service computing system receiving a request to provide preview data for a web site preview corresponding to a web site identifier, the service computing system determines client presentation state of one or more client computing systems that is or are to render a web site preview using preview data that is to be provided in response to the request. The service computing system selects a preview template at least in part based on the determined client presentation state. The service computing system also populates the selected preview template with content from the web site to thereby generate preview data representing a preview of the web site identified by the web site identifier.
The service computing system then responds to the request with the preview data. That preview data defines how the web preview will appear on the client computing system. Thus, the client computing system uses the preview data to render the web preview. Because the web preview is formulated taking into consideration presentation state of the client computing system that renders the web site preview, the web site preview is better matched with that presentation context, and thus has better appearance, and occupies an appropriate amount of space.
Additional features and advantages will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the teachings herein. Features and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. Features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features can be obtained, a more particular description of the subject matter briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting in scope, embodiments will be described and explained with additional specificity and details through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Some embodiments described herein relate to the generation of a web site preview based on client presentation state of the client computing system(s) that will render the web site preview. In accordance with one embodiment described herein, upon a service computing system receiving a request to provide preview data for a web site preview corresponding to a web site identifier, the service computing system determines client presentation state of one or more client computing systems that is or are to render a web site preview using preview data that is to be provided in response to the request. The service computing system selects a preview template at least in part based on the determined client presentation state. The service computing system also populates the selected preview template with content from the web site to thereby generate preview data representing a preview of the web site identified by the web site identifier.
The service computing system then responds to the request with the preview data. That preview data defines how the web preview will appear on the client computing system. Thus, the client computing system uses the preview data to render the web preview. Because the web preview is formulated taking into consideration presentation state of the client computing system that renders the web site preview, the web site preview is better matched with that presentation context, and thus has better appearance, and occupies an appropriate amount of space.
Some of the acts of the method 100 are performed by a client computing system, such as the client computing system 202 of
The method 100 includes the client computing system accessing a web site identifier (act 111), determining that a web site preview of the web site identified by the web site identifier is to be presented in a client presentation state (act 112), and causing a request for a preview of the web site identified by the web site identifier to be dispatched to a service computing system (act 113). A client computing system then receives a response to the request with the preview data (act 131), and renders the preview in the client application state using the preview data (act 131).
Before turning to the acts performed by the service computing system, the meaning of the dashed line 130 will now be described. The dashed line 130 represents that acts 111 through 113 may be performed by one client computing system, and that the acts 131 and 132 may be performed by that same client computing system, or perhaps by a different computing system. That is, one client computing system may dispatch a request for a preview to the service computing system, while that same client computing system and/or one or more other client computing systems may each receive the response and renders the web site preview based on preview data within the response.
As mentioned above, the client application that generates the preview request identifies client presentation state in which the requested web site preview will be rendered (refer to act 112). This client presentation state could be any state that could impact how the web site preview appears. As an example, the client presentation state could be an application (i.e., an application identifier) in which the web site preview will be rendered. Examples of such applications may include particular identified social media applications, video conferencing applications, group chat applications, or the like.
As another example, the client presentation state could be a state of an application in which the web site preview is to be rendered. As an example, the state of the application could be that a chat state is active, that a particular window that is to be rendered is active or of a particular size, and so forth. As another example, the presentation state could represent whether a window in which the web site preview state will appear is a chat window between only two client computing systems, or a group chat window with a larger number of participants.
As for the service computing system, the service computing system receives a request to provide preview data for a web site preview corresponding to a web site identifier (act 121). In
In response to receiving the preview request (act 121), the service computing system generates preview data representing a preview of a web site represented by the web site identifier (act 122). In
In accordance with the method 100, after the preview data is generated (act 122), the service computing system then causes the generated preview data to be sent to the client computing system (act 123). As an example, in
The client application that submits the preview request may identify that there is more than one client presentation state in which the web site preview may appear. This may be true even if the multiple previews are to be displayed in the same application. In such a case, in response to receiving the preview request (act 121) that includes multiple different presentation states of the application, the service computing system generates different preview data representing a different preview data of a web site represented by the same web site identifier requested by the same application under different client presentation states (act 122). For example, a same application may include at least two different presentation states. As an example, there may be a first state that is a messaging session in an ongoing real time meeting, and a second state may be a messaging session in a pure chat thread not associated with a real time meeting. A same web site identifier corresponding to the same website posted in the first and second states will generate different preview displays in the messaging session in an ongoing real time meeting and the message session in a pure chat thread not associated with a real time meeting, respectively.
In another embodiment, two or more different applications, executing on a requesting device, include different client presentation states. In response to receiving the preview request (act 121) that embedding different presentation states of the application, the service computing system generates different preview data representing a different preview of a web site represented by the same web site identifier requested by different applications (act 122).
In accordance with the method 400, the service computing system accesses the client presentation state from the preview request (act 401). For instance, if the preview request was the preview request 300 of
As one additional possibility, the selection of the preview template may additionally take into consideration web site metadata of the web site for which a preview is being generated. In that case, the service computing system would use the web site identifier within the preview request to navigate to the web site, and obtain the relevant metadata from that web site. As an example, if the preview request was the preview request 300 of
For example, in
The preview template is then selected (act 403) based on the client presentation state, as well as potentially based on any of the web site metadata (such as the type 523 of the web site, the entity 524 of the web site, and so forth). For example, the service computing system 501 may have access to a preview template collection 540. In this example, the collection 540 has four preview templates 541 through 544, but this is just a simple example only. There may be countless preview templates available to the service computing system 501. In this example, suppose that the service selects preview template 542, which selection is represented by arrow 533.
The fields within the template define what content of the web site is to be used to populate the template. This includes what action controls to populate into the template, and where. Accordingly, the service uses the template to determine what content to populate into the template (act 404). As an example, if the selected template is preview template 542, the preview template 542 defines what content of the web site to populate into the preview template.
The preview service may then acquire the appropriate content of the web site (act 405) as represented by bi-directional arrow 534. Although the arrows 532 and 534 are shown separately, all information (metadata and content) required to generate the preview may be acquired from the web site 502 from a single request and response.
The service computing system then populates that content into the web site template (as an example of act 406). The populated preview template may then serve is the generated preview data that is then sent to the client. This preview data may be for example, a data interchange format object, such as a JSON object, which is a sequence of declarations that defines how to render the web site preview. The client may then interpret the preview data to thereby render the web site preview with the client presentation state.
Accordingly, the principles described herein allow for different previews of a web site to be presented (even for the same web site) depending on the client presentation state in which the web site preview will be presented.
Specifically,
As described above, the template is selected at least in part based on the web site metadata. As an example, the web site metadata may include a type of web site. For example, a product web site (of type “product”) may by default result in the selection of a product web site preview, a restaurant web site (of type “restaurant”) may by default result in selection of a restaurant web site preview, an airline web site (of type “airline”) may by default result in selection of an airline web site. Such selection does not rely on any input by the web site owner itself. Instead, the selection merely by default pivots on the value of the type field in the web site metadata.
Typically, when a web site preview is presented to a user, the preview may act as a hyperlink (or otherwise contain a hyperlink) that when selected, navigates the user to the web site that was previewed by the web site preview. Then, the user can interact with the web site as normal including interacting with any controls provided by the web site. However, in accordance with some embodiments of the principles described herein, one or more controls of the web site are provided within the web site preview itself. Thus, a user can use those controls without even navigating to the web site.
For illustrative purposes only,
As represented by dashed lines 810, 820 and 830, each control is associated with endpoint identifiers 811, 812 and 813 respectively. The controls also have corresponding configurations 821, 822 and 823 that define the type of connection that is facilitated by the respective control. Thus, the control 801 facilitates a specific type of connection defined by the configuration 821 to the endpoint identified by the endpoint identifier 811. Furthermore, in this example, the control 802 facilitates a specific type of connection defined by the configuration 822 to the endpoint identified by the endpoint identifier 812. Lastly in this example, the control 803 facilitates a specific type of connection defined by the configuration 823 to the endpoint identified by the endpoint identifier 813. The preview data is generated to be structured to be interpreted by the client computing system to cause the client computing system to render the web site preview with an action control associated with an action and that facilitates connection to the endpoint identified by the endpoint identifier.
One example of a connection type is a navigation connection type in which the client computing system is navigated to the endpoint in response to its user interacting with the control. Such a control will be referred to herein as a “navigation control”. Another example of a connection type is an input connection type in which the user can provide input (e.g., text, a Boolean, a selection from a group, or the like) to the connected endpoint. Such a control will be referred to herein as an “input control”. Another example of a connection type is an output connection in which the endpoint provides data to populate into the control, and perhaps even update that data. Such a control will be referred to herein as an “output control”.
These are just three different examples of a connection type and associated control type. The principles described herein apply regardless of the type of connection that the control facilitates. Furthermore, the principles described herein apply regardless of the form of the control, regardless of layout, design, color, size, shape, user interactivity types, and so forth.
Examples of navigation controls will now be described. For instance, if the web site is a restaurant web site, an example navigation control could be a description control, that when interacted with, takes the user to a description endpoint maintained by the restaurant that is perhaps managed by the restaurant. As another example, there may also be a navigation control in the form of a menu control that when interacted with, takes the user to a menu endpoint maintained by the restaurant that presents a menu of the restaurant. These endpoints may for instance be within the domain of the web site that is being previewed (in this case, the restaurant web site).
However, there may also be controls with endpoints that are completely outside of the domain of the restaurant web site. As examples, there may be a navigation control to make a reservation for the restaurant, which when interacted with takes the user to a reservation service endpoint that is not managed by the restaurant web site. As another example, the restaurant web site preview may provide a navigation control to provide a map to see where the restaurant is and/or get directions to the restaurant, which when interacted with takes the user to a mapping service endpoint that is also not managed by the restaurant web site. The same web site preview may provide a navigations control that when interacted with takes a user to a review service that is also not managed by the restaurant web site. Thus, the controls may provide functionalities that link to services that are familiar to the user, and thus are easily and comfortably navigated. Furthermore, the web site that has the preview need not themselves provide the services that underlie each control in the preview. Instead, the controls may link to endpoints that are outside of the domain of the web site.
As an example of an input control, there may be an input control that allows the user to add their name to a waitlist, which when interacted with provides a user identifier to the endpoint that registers those waiting for a table. As an example of an output control, the restaurant may generate an output control that shows wait time, which updates to reflect a time estimate for minutes remaining until their table is available. As another example of an output control this time in the context of an airline web site, the output control may update to reflect the real-time status of a flight (e.g., on time, in flight, delayed, landed, and so forth) of a flight. There might be another control that may be interacted with to connect to a flight tracker service, to thereby present the user with a flight tracking update.
Thus, the user has a consistent preview across all product web site previews, across all restaurant web site previews, and so forth, where those web site previews are tailored towards the type of web site. The user is thereby given an intuitive web site preview. Such web site previews may be generated with the aim of providing a robust and rich experience for the user that views and/or interfaces with the web site preview, and may consider input from other stakeholders. Because the service controls how the web site preview appears, rather than have such control left to each client, the user is provided with a much more consistent user experience. Furthermore, because the service computing system is a service that may operate in a cloud computing environment that has abundant processing, memory and storage resources, the generation of the preview may consider a variety of factors and be the result of complex processing, thereby providing a more substantial web site preview.
Alternatively, or in addition, relevant metadata used to select the preview template may be the entity expressed in the metadata of the web site. This is the provider of the web site. In one embodiment, that entity can register a particular preview template with the preview service. Thus, in this embodiment, the selection of the preview template depends on the entity.
As another example, the selection may be based on a screen size of the client that is to render the web site preview. The screen size may be identified within the request from the client to the preview service. The entity may register a different preview template based on each of multiple screen sizes. Alternatively, or in addition, the selection may be based on both a type of web site as well as the screen size of the client. Thus, the web site entity, the type of the web site, the context in which the preview will be rendered, and the screen size of the client that will render the preview (or various combinations of the above) may be used to select the appropriate preview template.
Accordingly, the principles described herein provide a rich preview experience, where generation of the preview is determined based on data performed at a preview service, and in which the user may interact directly with the preview, rather than having to navigate to the associated web site.
Because the principles described herein are performed in the context of a computing system, some introductory discussion of a computing system will be described with respect to
As illustrated in
The computing system 900 also has thereon multiple structures often referred to as an “executable component”. For instance, the memory 904 of the computing system 900 is illustrated as including executable component 906. The term “executable component” is the name for a structure that is well understood to one of ordinary skill in the art in the field of computing as being a structure that can be software, hardware, or a combination thereof. For instance, when implemented in software, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the structure of an executable component may include software objects, routines, methods (and so forth) that may be executed on the computing system. Such an executable component exists in the heap of a computing system, in computer-readable storage media, or a combination.
One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the structure of the executable component exists on a computer-readable medium such that, when interpreted by one or more processors of a computing system (e.g., by a processor thread), the computing system is caused to perform a function. Such structure may be computer readable directly by the processors (as is the case if the executable component were binary). Alternatively, the structure may be structured to be interpretable and/or compiled (whether in a single stage or in multiple stages) so as to generate such binary that is directly interpretable by the processors. Such an understanding of example structures of an executable component is well within the understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art of computing when using the term “executable component”.
The term “executable component” is also well understood by one of ordinary skill as including structures, such as hard coded or hard wired logic gates, that are implemented exclusively or near-exclusively in hardware, such as within a field programmable gate array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or any other specialized circuit. Accordingly, the term “executable component” is a term for a structure that is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art of computing, whether implemented in software, hardware, or a combination. In this description, the terms “component”, “agent”, “manager”, “service”, “engine”, “module”, “virtual machine” or the like may also be used. As used in this description and in the case, these terms (whether expressed with or without a modifying clause) are also intended to be synonymous with the term “executable component”, and thus also have a structure that is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art of computing.
In the description that follows, embodiments are described with reference to acts that are performed by one or more computing systems. If such acts are implemented in software, one or more processors (of the associated computing system that performs the act) direct the operation of the computing system in response to having executed computer-executable instructions that constitute an executable component. For example, such computer-executable instructions may be embodied on one or more computer-readable media that form a computer program product. An example of such an operation involves the manipulation of data. If such acts are implemented exclusively or near-exclusively in hardware, such as within a FPGA or an ASIC, the computer-executable instructions may be hard-coded or hard-wired logic gates. The computer-executable instructions (and the manipulated data) may be stored in the memory 904 of the computing system 900. Computing system 900 may also contain communication channels 908 that allow the computing system 900 to communicate with other computing systems over, for example, network 910.
While not all computing systems require a user interface, in some embodiments, the computing system 900 includes a user interface system 912 for use in interfacing with a user. The user interface system 912 may include output mechanisms 912A as well as input mechanisms 912B. The principles described herein are not limited to the precise output mechanisms 912A or input mechanisms 912B as such will depend on the nature of the device. However, output mechanisms 912A might include, for instance, speakers, displays, tactile output, virtual or augmented reality, holograms and so forth. Examples of input mechanisms 912B might include, for instance, microphones, touchscreens, virtual or augmented reality, holograms, cameras, keyboards, mouse or other pointer input, sensors of any type, and so forth.
Embodiments described herein may comprise or utilize a special-purpose or general-purpose computing system including computer hardware, such as, for example, one or more processors and system memory, as discussed in greater detail below. Embodiments described herein also include physical and other computer-readable media for carrying or storing computer-executable instructions and/or data structures. Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general-purpose or special-purpose computing system. Computer-readable media that store computer-executable instructions are physical storage media. Computer-readable media that carry computer-executable instructions are transmission media. Thus, by way of example, and not limitation, embodiments of the invention can comprise at least two distinctly different kinds of computer-readable media: storage media and transmission media.
Computer-readable storage media includes RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM, or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage, or other magnetic storage devices, or any other physical and tangible storage medium which can be used to store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general-purpose or special-purpose computing system.
A “network” is defined as one or more data links that enable the transport of electronic data between computing systems and/or modules and/or other electronic devices. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless) to a computing system, the computing system properly views the connection as a transmission medium. Transmission media can include a network and/or data links which can be used to carry desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general-purpose or special-purpose computing system. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
Further, upon reaching various computing system components, program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures can be transferred automatically from transmission media to storage media (or vice versa). For example, computer-executable instructions or data structures received over a network or data link can be buffered in RAM within a network interface module (e.g., a “NIC”), and then be eventually transferred to computing system RAM and/or to less volatile storage media at a computing system. Thus, it should be understood that storage media can be included in computing system components that also (or even primarily) utilize transmission media.
Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which, when executed at a processor, cause a general-purpose computing system, special-purpose computing system, or special-purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Alternatively, or in addition, the computer-executable instructions may configure the computing system to perform a certain function or group of functions. The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries or even instructions that undergo some translation (such as compilation) before direct execution by the processors, such as intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, or even source code.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the described features or acts described above. Rather, the described features and acts are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced in network computing environments with many types of computing system configurations, including, personal computers, desktop computers, laptop computers, message processors, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, mobile telephones, PDAs, pagers, routers, switches, datacenters, wearables (such as glasses) and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed system environments where local and remote computing system, which are linked (either by hardwired data links, wireless data links, or by a combination of hardwired and wireless data links) through a network, both perform tasks. In a distributed system environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the invention may be practiced in a cloud computing environment. Cloud computing environments may be distributed, although this is not required. When distributed, cloud computing environments may be distributed internationally within an organization and/or have components possessed across multiple organizations. In this description and the following claims, “cloud computing” is defined as a model for enabling on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services). The definition of “cloud computing” is not limited to any of the other numerous advantages that can be obtained from such a model when properly deployed.
For the processes and methods disclosed herein, the operations performed in the processes and methods may be implemented in differing order. Furthermore, the outlined operations are only provided as examples, and some of the operations may be optional, combined into fewer steps and operations, supplemented with further operations, or expanded into additional operations without detracting from the essence of the disclosed embodiments.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicate by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5708825 | Sotomayor | Jan 1998 | A |
5890172 | Borman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
7031968 | Kremer | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7159188 | Stabb et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174513 | Nickum et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7383248 | Chen | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7765206 | Hillis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7814425 | Oshaugnessy et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
8903931 | Rothman et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8949370 | Wu et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9542365 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9973462 | Petersen | May 2018 | B1 |
10621272 | Rose et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
20020073058 | Kremer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129114 | Sundaresan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030014415 | Weiss | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040003351 | Sommerer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040205514 | Sommerer | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267701 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268231 | Tunning | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022128 | Nicholas et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050235203 | Undasan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246643 | Gusmorino et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060069617 | Milener et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101068 | Stuhec | May 2006 | A1 |
20070038718 | Khoo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070180381 | Rice et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080162529 | Stuhec | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090228804 | Kim | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100120456 | Karmarkar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100312641 | Zaibert et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110145698 | Penov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173569 | Howes | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110242601 | Takahashi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120150989 | Portnoy | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203929 | Patalsky | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120328259 | Seibert et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130151936 | Hsu | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159445 | Zonka | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130262986 | Leblond et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140040226 | Sadhukha | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040770 | Khoo | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140108408 | Edgar et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140136942 | Kumar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140245176 | Murali et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247278 | Samara et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150026201 | Mukherjee | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150073922 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150220499 | Katic | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236979 | Kirillov et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150347532 | Shaw et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160092245 | Hogue et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092428 | Llic et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103861 | Jacob | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160180257 | Rees et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160234267 | Hebbar | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160323217 | Subramani et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334979 | Persson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170052943 | Owens et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170097808 | Masterson et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170111431 | Scoda et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170111467 | Zhang | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180033064 | Varley | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180095604 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180260481 | Rathod | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180300217 | Doggett | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190102472 | Van Rensburg et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190147178 | Baldwin et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200272669 | Ebbesen et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200311135 | Kligman et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200344188 | Raskin et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200351314 | Butcher et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210034690 | Kim et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210065254 | Zheng et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20230385363 | Glocke et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230385525 | Glocke et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103425794 | Dec 2013 | CN |
108628870 | Oct 2018 | CN |
2010129088 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“App Clips”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20220325114934/https://developer.apple.com/app-clips/, Mar. 25, 2022, 4 Pages. |
“The Verge”, Retrieved from: https://www.theverge.com/, Mar. 30, 2022, 2 Pages. |
Chen, et al., “Teams website tabs leads to customer confusion”, Retrieved from: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/troubleshoot/tabs/website-tabs-cause-confusion-teams, Mar. 8, 2022, 2 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,658, filed May 24, 2022. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US23/014199”, dated Jun. 6, 2023, 13 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US23/014201”, dated Jun. 12, 2023, 14 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US23/014209”, dated Jun. 19, 2023, 14 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,665”, dated Feb. 16, 2023, 25 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,675”, dated Feb. 16, 2023, 15 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,665, filed May 24, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,675, filed May 24, 2022. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,658”, dated Aug. 11, 2023, 26 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,665”, dated Aug. 17, 2023, 12 Pages. |
“Getting Started with Schema.org Using Microdata”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20220523200400/https://schema.org/docs/gs.html, Retrieved Date: May 23, 2022, 5 Pages. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 7, 2023, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/752,675, 22 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230385524 A1 | Nov 2023 | US |