The present application is based on, and claims priority from, French Application Number 07 53521, filed Feb. 27, 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a through pivot, meaning a device capable of supporting a rotary shaft extending from both sides of the pivot, and to a mounting, made with this pivot, for a rotary shaft having a limited amplitude of rotation.
In space applications it is necessary to be able to orientate certain components of a satellite or spacecraft, such as an antenna, a boom, etc., in a predetermined direction in order, for example, to point them at a fixed star, to maintain the aim at a point on the surface of the Earth, or to scan a particular region on the surface of the Earth or of some celestial body. These positionings require frequent corrections to compensate for the inevitable drift of direction, and these multiple corrections involve a large number of cycles of micro-rotation for these vehicular appendages and for their mountings. This phase is known as fine pointing.
Because of the irreversible nature of the insertion into orbit of a satellite, the design of the spacecraft has to build in a very long life, measured in number of cycles, for the mountings, in order to ensure their ability to withstand this enormous number of stresses. For example, the life may be greater than 600,000 cycles. Other requirements of the mountings are great mechanical strength (to withstand external forces and bending moments exerted on the mounted shaft), high transverse stiffness, high-precision zero-tolerance guidance, an amplitude of rotation greater than 1° in both directions, and, a low resistive torque.
It is known practice to construct a mounting for a rotary shaft with a pivot having crossed flexible webs, notably those known by the name “Bendix Pivot”. This type of pivot is not a through pivot. It is therefore necessary to cantilever-mount the mounted shaft, which means large stresses in the webs of the pivot and large stresses being transmitted to the supporting frame, even with a double-pivot mounting. This type of pivot therefore offers limited mechanical strength and transverse stiffness, and does not satisfactorily meet all the requirements of a fine-pointing device.
It is also known practice to support a shaft with a mounting comprising two ball-bearing pivots. Such a device is subject to wear and therefore has a limited life. It also therefore does not satisfactorily meet all the requirements for a fine-pointing mounting design for a space application.
It is an object of the invention to provide a pivot and a mounting for a rotary shaft that avoids at least some of the above-mentioned drawbacks of the prior art. In particular, it is an object of the invention to provide a pivot and a mounting for a rotary shaft that are suitable for constructing a fine-pointing device, especially for a space application.
For this purpose, the invention provides a through pivot comprising a stator and a rotor, the rotor being capable of turning relative to the stator about an axis of rotation and being capable of accepting a through shaft aligned with the axis of rotation, which pivot is characterized in that the rotor is connected to the stator by a plurality of flexible elements capable of being deformed to allow the rotor to rotate, and in that in a condition of rest the flexible elements form an angle of inclination relative to a radial direction passing through the axis of rotation.
Because of these features, the pivot is able to support a through shaft, thus giving good mechanical behaviour. Moreover, because the rotor is allowed to rotate by the deformation of the flexible elements, there is no mechanical wear due to friction and its life is extended. It has been observed that arranging the flexible elements at an angle of inclination limits the tensile and bending forces in the flexible elements. The resistive torque and the stresses in the flexible elements are therefore low, and this allows precise guidance over an amplitude of several degrees, and an extended life.
The stator preferably comprises a frame in the form of a regular polygon, the flexible elements being fixed to the corresponding vertices of the frame.
The rotor advantageously comprises a cylindrical ring, the flexible elements being fixed to an outer surface of said ring.
In one particular embodiment, the ring has a central hole, the rotor being capable of accepting a through shaft passing through said central hole.
The pivot advantageously comprises three uniformly distributed flexible elements.
The flexible elements are advantageously planar rectangular shaped webs arranged in a plane parallel to the axis of rotation. This enables an axial force to be withstood.
In one particular embodiment, the angle of inclination is between 2° and 1020 , preferably between 4° and 5°.
The invention also provides a shaft mounting comprising two pivots according to the above invention arranged at a distance from each other with their respective axes of rotation collinear.
This arrangement more effectively absorbs forces exerted on the mounted shaft and thus improves the mechanical strength and stiffness. Additionally, it is possible for the shaft to carry useful components on either side of the mounting.
Still other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown and described, simply by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated of carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description thereof are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, wherein elements having the same reference numeral designations represent like elements throughout and wherein:
The pivot 1 comprises a stator 2 comprising a frame in the shape of an isosceles triangle, and a rotor 3 capable of rotating relative to the stator 2 about an axis A. The rotor 3 is in the form of a cylindrical ring of revolution, with an axis A. The centres of the stator 2 and rotor 3 coincide with each other.
The stator 2 and the rotor 3 are connected by three webs 4. The webs 4 are shaped like rectangular planar plates. They are connected to the corresponding vertices of the stator 2 along one short side, and to an outer surface of the rotor 3 along the other short side.
The stator could be a different shape depending on the mechanism around it, and could for example have a different number of sides to suit the number of webs, which is not necessarily three. Moreover, the webs could be replaced by other flexible elements, such as tubes.
The rotor 3 can rotate in the direction indicated by the arrow 15 in
Curve 7 corresponds to the webs being straight, that is to say the angle of inclination α is zero, and enables a comparison to be made between the resistive torques in the different cases of inclination of the webs. It will be seen that the torque increases asymptotically with the angle of rotation because torque components due to tension and bending are added together. Curves 8 and 9 correspond to angles of inclination α of 4° and 5°, respectively. The torque remains low and stable in the range of angles of rotation of interest, because in this case from a certain angle of rotation the tensile component changes sign and is subtracted from the bending component.
It is therefore observed that the pivot 1 allows the rotor 3 to rotate within a range of several degrees about a reference position, with a limited and stable torque and therefore without exceeding the capacity of the motor. In the example shown, 1.5° has been chosen as the reference position, and the rotor 3 can rotate in both directions about this position. In
There exists an optimal angle of inclination α which minimizes the torque and/or stresses. This optimal angle may depend on the dimensions of the pivot 1 and on the material used. The optimal angle may for example be in the range 2° to 10°, preferably 4° to 5°.
Although the invention has been described in relation to one particular embodiment, it will be obvious that it is in no way limited to it and that it encompasses all technical equivalents of the means described and their combinations where these fall within the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 53521 | Feb 2007 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2465425 | Bower | Mar 1949 | A |
2621850 | Firth | Dec 1952 | A |
2722464 | Galaba | Nov 1955 | A |
2936999 | Jacobus et al. | May 1960 | A |
3083757 | Kraft et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3185532 | Loch | May 1965 | A |
3318642 | Peterson | May 1967 | A |
3343013 | Wightman et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3400939 | Jones | Sep 1968 | A |
3468587 | Hillander | Sep 1969 | A |
3509578 | Cribb | Apr 1970 | A |
3648999 | Bauer | Mar 1972 | A |
3664185 | Low et al. | May 1972 | A |
4261211 | Haberland | Apr 1981 | A |
4564300 | Schulze | Jan 1986 | A |
4655614 | Schott | Apr 1987 | A |
5209461 | Whightsil, Sr. | May 1993 | A |
5475275 | Dohogne et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5545118 | Romanauskas | Aug 1996 | A |
5547174 | Bade et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5610461 | Dohogne et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620169 | Payne | Apr 1997 | A |
5884892 | Gassen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6146044 | Calvet | Nov 2000 | A |
6200220 | Drew | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6267363 | Genequand et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6440044 | Francis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6508630 | Liu et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6911757 | Lopatinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7093827 | Culpepper | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7188831 | Coppoolse | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7270319 | Culpepper | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7364145 | Knirck et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7673461 | Cameriano et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7780404 | Horng et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20030030348 | Lopatinsky et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040094882 | Coppoolse | May 2004 | A1 |
20040197189 | Seo et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050053492 | Su | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050111906 | Liou et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070065321 | Durham | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129153 | Grebenstein | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080170935 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193275 | De Filippis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100145510 | Ihrke et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100296862 | Baudasse | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0449001 | Oct 1991 | EP |
2212584 | Jul 1974 | FR |
Entry |
---|
English Abstract of GB1446729 which corresponds to FR2212584. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080205976 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |