The present disclosure relates generally to powered locomotives, and more particularly, to traction control systems and methods for powered locomotives.
A conventional locomotive is generally supported on rails by an arrangement of suspension elements or bogies. While various arrangements are available, a typical locomotive is supported by two bogies, each having a plurality of wheelsets. In one known configuration, each bogie supports three wheelsets where each wheelset includes two wheels that are joined by an axle. The typical bogie also supports propulsion or drive mechanisms, such as an electric motor, to drive the wheelsets. Often, due to certain economic advantages, only one or two of the wheelsets of a bogie are driven by electric motors, while the remaining wheelsets support a portion of the load but are otherwise left to idle. While such configurations can provide economic benefits, these configurations also introduce concerns that have yet to be resolved.
While achieving optimal traction is a common concern for all locomotives, traction is a particular concern in locomotives using the bogie arrangements noted above, where only two out of three wheelsets are driven. In general, traction can be improved by increasing axle load on the driven wheels. However, regulatory requirements and other constraints place an upper limit on the amount of axle load that is allowed for a set of rails. Although it may be possible to overcome some of these limitations using active suspension solutions, currently available solutions tend to be impractical and/or inadequate.
One active solution is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,313,111 (“Ahuja”), which discloses a suspension system for locomotives with three wheelsets per bogie. In particular, the system in Ahuja shifts more weight onto the endmost wheelsets of each bogie by raising the center wheelset off of the rails. Although the solution may be effective in transferring weight to the drive wheels, Ahuja's configuration involves a complete redesign of the suspension and other substantial modifications to the conventional bogie. Moreover, Ahuja's solution may be costly to implement and not readily retrofittable to existing bogies and suspension components. Furthermore, Ahuja is only applicable to bogie configurations that have center-mounted idler wheelsets and endmost driven wheelsets, which are relatively less common among conventional bogie arrangements.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages associated with conventional locomotives, a need exists for a solution that is not only applicable to more commonly used bogie configurations, but also simple and cost-efficient enough to implement or retrofit. There is also a need for a system that can substantially improve traction or adhesion without exceeding regulatory constraints and without adversely affecting the overall performance of the locomotive. Furthermore, there is a need for an active system that can actively adjust axle load and traction according to changing operating conditions. The present disclosure is directed at addressing one or more of the deficiencies and disadvantages set forth above. However, it should be appreciated that the solution of any particular problem is not a limitation on the scope of this disclosure or of the attached claims except to the extent expressly noted.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, a weight shifting mechanism for a bogie frame supporting at least one idler axle and one or more driven axles is provided. The weight shifting mechanism may include an axle support pivotally coupled to the idler axle, a pusher link pivotally coupled to the axle support and forming a first fulcrum with the bogie frame, a support member pivotally coupled to the pusher link and the axle support, and an actuator mounted on the support member and actuatably coupled to the axle support via a live lever and a connector link. The live lever may form a second fulcrum with the support member and may be pivotally coupled to the connector link. The connector link may be pivotally coupled to the axle support. The actuator may selectively pivot the live lever about the second fulcrum in a manner configured to pivot the axle support about the idler axle and move the bogie frame relative to the idler axle.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, a weight shifting system for a bogie frame of a locomotive supporting at least one idler axle and one or more driven axles is provided. The weight shifting system may include a weight shifting mechanism movably coupled between the idler axle and the bogie frame, an actuator operatively coupled to the weight shifting mechanism, and a controller operatively coupled to the actuator. The actuator may be configured to selectively engage the weight shifting mechanism to move the bogie frame relative to the idler axle. The controller may be configured to activate a traction assist command based on one or more operating conditions of the locomotive, and selectively enable the actuator when the traction assist mode is active.
In yet another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of shifting weight on a bogie frame of a locomotive supporting at least one idler axle and one or more driven axles is provided. The method may include providing a weight shifting mechanism movably coupled between the idler axle and the bogie frame, providing an actuator operatively coupled to the weight shifting mechanism and configured to selectively engage the weight shifting mechanism to move the bogie frame relative to the idler axle, monitoring one or more operating conditions of the locomotive, activating a traction assist mode based on the operating conditions, and selectively enabling the actuator when the traction assist mode is active.
These and other aspects and features will be more readily understood when reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
While the following detailed description is given with respect to certain illustrative embodiments, it is to be understood that such embodiments are not to be construed as limiting, but rather the present disclosure is entitled to a scope of protection consistent with all embodiments, modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents thereto.
Referring to
Turning to
Turning now to
In general, the weight or load typically supported by the bogie frame 104 of
According to the arrangement shown in
Still referring to
In general, the present disclosure finds utility in various applications associated with locomotives or other rail vehicles that may be powered or driven by propulsion devices, such as electric traction motors, or the like. The present disclosure is also applicable to any other vehicle that may be powered by propulsion devices and provided with suspension similar to those of rail vehicles. Moreover, the present disclosure is applicable to vehicles which may employ one or more bogie frames and multiple wheelsets, where at least one of the wheelsets is an idler wheelset. The present disclosure provides a simplified solution that can actively shift weight on a bogie frame away from idler wheels and toward driven wheels according to vehicle operating conditions to increase traction at the driven wheels. Furthermore, the present disclosure is able to actively adjust the amount of traction at the driven wheels based on changes in operating conditions and according to predefined limits to ensure compliance with rail regulations.
Turning to
As shown in block 146-2 of
Once traction assist mode has been activated, the method 146 in block 146-4 of
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that while only certain embodiments have been set forth for the purposes of illustration, alternatives and modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure and the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
227778 | Henszey | May 1880 | A |
262163 | Waterman | Aug 1882 | A |
284520 | Wetmore | Sep 1883 | A |
307404 | Merrill | Oct 1884 | A |
314747 | Stream | Mar 1885 | A |
316380 | Merrill | Apr 1885 | A |
323283 | Dees | Jul 1885 | A |
352005 | Richardson | Nov 1886 | A |
363856 | Selkirk | May 1887 | A |
697536 | Player | Apr 1902 | A |
744398 | Player | Nov 1903 | A |
816505 | Sheldon | Mar 1906 | A |
867486 | Dodd | Oct 1907 | A |
3520005 | Downes | Jul 1970 | A |
8196519 | Kumar | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8313111 | Ahuja et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8371231 | Kumar | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371232 | Kumar | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371233 | Kumar | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8424888 | Ahuja et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8468952 | Worden et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8584596 | Worden | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8677909 | Kumar | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8935983 | Kumar | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20090031915 | Kumar | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090031917 | Kumar | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090095194 | Kumar | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095195 | Kumar | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095197 | Kumar | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099714 | Kumar | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100175580 | Gorski et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175581 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110079168 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082606 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120049481 | Ahuja | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120173056 | Kumar | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130253739 | Kumar | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1395848 | May 1975 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180134305 A1 | May 2018 | US |