The present invention generally relates to nozzle assemblies for steam turbines and particularly relates to a welded nozzle assembly and fixtures facilitating alignment and manufacture of the nozzle.
Steam turbines typically comprise static nozzle segments that direct the flow of steam into rotating buckets that are connected to a rotor. In steam turbines, a row of nozzles, each nozzle including an airfoil or blade construction, is typically called a diaphragm stage. Conventional diaphragm stages are constructed principally using one of two methods. A first method uses a band/ring construction wherein the airfoils are first welded between inner and outer bands extending about 180°. Those arcuate bands with welded airfoils are then assembled, i.e., welded between the inner and outer rings of the stator of the turbine. The second method often consists of airfoils welded directly to inner and outer rings using a fillet weld at the ring interfaces. The latter method is typically used for larger airfoils where access for creating the weld is available.
There are inherent limitations using the first-mentioned band/ring method of assembly. A principle limitation in the band/ring assembly method is the inherent weld distortion of the flowpath, i.e., between adjacent blades and the steam path sidewalls. The weld used for these assemblies is of considerable size and heat input. That is, the weld requires high heat input using a significant quantity of metal filler. Alternatively, the welds are very deep electron beam welds (EBWs) without filler metal. This material or heat input causes the flow path to distort e.g., material shrinkage causes the airfoils to bow out of their designed shaped in the flow path. In many cases, the airfoils require adjustment after welding and stress relief. The result of this steam path distortion is reduced stator efficiency. The surface profiles of the inner and outer bands can also change as a result of welding the nozzles into the stator assembly further causing an irregular flow path. The nozzles and bands thus generally bend and distort. This requires substantial finishing of the nozzle configuration to bring it into design criteria. In many cases, approximately 30% of the costs of the overall construction of the nozzle assembly is in the deformation of the nozzle assembly, after welding and stress relief, back to its design configuration.
Also, methods of assembly using single nozzle construction welded into rings do not have determined weld depth, lack assembly alignment features on both the inner and outer ring and also lack retainment features in the event of a weld failure. Further, current nozzle assemblies and designs do not have common features between nozzle sizes that enable repeatable fixturing processes. That is, the nozzle assemblies do not have a feature common to all nozzle sizes for reference by machine control tools and without that feature, each nozzle assembly size requires specific setup, preprocessing, and specific tooling with consequent increase costs. Accordingly, there has been demonstrated a need for an improved steam flowpath for a stator nozzle which includes low input heat welds to minimize or eliminate steam path distortion resultant from welding processes as well as to improve production and cycle costs by adding features that assist in assembly procedures, machining fixturing, facilitate alignment of the nozzle assembly in the stator and create a mechanical lock to prevent downstream movement of the nozzle assembly in the event of a weld failure.
In accordance with one exemplary non-limiting embodiment, the invention relates to a nozzle blade and nozzle ring assembly comprising a nozzle blade having radially inner and outer sidewalls with an airfoil portion extending therebetween; the inner and outer sidewalls walls formed with axially-extending first surface features along forward and aft marginal edges of the inner and outer sidewalls, respectively; and radially inner and outer nozzle rings formed with corresponding axially-extending second surface features mated with the first surface features, wherein the radially inner and outer sidewalls are welded to the radially inner and outer nozzle rings only along the mated first and second surface features.
In another non-limiting aspect the invention relates to a nozzle blade and nozzle ring assembly comprising a nozzle blade having radially inner and outer sidewalls with an airfoil portion extending therebetween; the inner and outer sidewalls walls each formed with first forward and aft marginal edges; and radially inner and outer nozzle rings each formed with second forward and aft marginal edges, the radially inner and outer sidewalls welded to the radially inner and outer nozzle rings only along the first forward and aft marginal edges and the second forward and aft marginal edges.
In still another aspect, the invention provides a method of attaching a nozzle assembly including at least one airfoil extending between inner and outer bands to inner and outer rings comprising forming first surface features along axially-spaced marginal fore and aft edges of each of the inner and outer bands; forming second surface features on the inner and outer rings that mate with the first features; and welding the inner and outer bands to the inner and outer rings only along the fore and aft marginal edges of the inner and outer bands.
Referring to
Still referring to
There are also current singlet type nozzle assemblies which do not have a determinant weld depth and thus employ varying weld depths to weld the singlets into the nozzle assembly between the inner and outer rings. That is, weld depths can vary because the gap between the sidewalls of the nozzle singlet and rings is not consistent. As the gap becomes larger, due to machining tolerances, the weld depths and properties of the weld change. A tight weld gap may produce a shorter than desired weld. A larger weld gap may drive the weld or beam deeper and may cause voids in the weld that are undesirable. Current singlet nozzle designs also use weld prep at the interface and this requires an undesirable higher heat input filler weld technique to be used.
Referring now to
The nozzle singlets 40 are then assembled between the inner and outer nozzle rings 60 and 62, respectively, using a low heat input type weld. For example, the low heat input type weld uses a butt weld interface and preferably employs a shallow electron beam weld or shallow laser weld or a shallow flux-TIG or A-TIG weld process. By using these weld processes and types of welds, the welds may be limited to the interfaces between the sidewalls 44, 46 and rings 60, 62 and specifically along the mechanical interface between steps 50, 52, 56 and 58 of the sidewalls and corresponding complimentary recesses 51, 53, 55 and 57 in the rings 60, 62 as best seen in
This step and recess configuration is used to control the weld depth and render it determinant and consistent between nozzle singlets during production. This interlock is also used to axially align the nozzle singlets between the inner and outer rings. The interlock holds the nozzles in position during the assembly of the nozzle singlets between the inner and outer rings and the welding. That is, the nozzle singlets can be packed tightly adjacent one another and between the inner and outer rings while remaining constrained by the rings. Further, the mechanical interlock retains the singlets in axial position during steam turbine operation in the event of a weld failure, i.e., prevents the singlet from moving downstream into contact with the rotor.
A method of assembly is best illustrated in
Referring particularly to
In
In
In the arrangements shown in
Turning now to
Note that using the same width and thickness for rails on various nozzles, and by having the rails pass through or cross the machine center, the respective alignment features permit universal application of the fixture 82 to all nozzle designs provided with an appropriately located top rail and notch as described above.
It will be appreciated that the fixturing rail 86 (or rail 70 or lug 69) on each nozzle singlet can remain on the singlet or be removed from the singlet after machining of the airfoil is completed. If the rail remains, it may be received in an appropriately sized groove in the inner or outer ring.
It will be appreciated that the location of the fixturing features as described above in connection with the inner and outer walls may be reversed, and that the tab and notch arrangement may have other suitable shapes that perform the desired alignment function.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/892,716 filed Aug. 27, 2007 which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/331,024, filed Jan. 13, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1740800 | Anton | Dec 1929 | A |
1998951 | Downer | Apr 1935 | A |
2245237 | Truex | Jun 1941 | A |
2654566 | Winnett et al. | Oct 1953 | A |
3365173 | Lynch et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3501246 | Hickey | Mar 1970 | A |
3788767 | Bednarczyk et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3849023 | Klompas | Nov 1974 | A |
4128929 | DeMusis | Dec 1978 | A |
4265595 | Bucy et al. | May 1981 | A |
4710097 | Tinti | Dec 1987 | A |
4889470 | Scalzo | Dec 1989 | A |
5022818 | Scalzo | Jun 1991 | A |
5024579 | Groenendaal et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5249918 | Knorowski | Oct 1993 | A |
5259727 | Quinn | Nov 1993 | A |
5343694 | Toborg et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5586864 | Knorowski et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593273 | Brinkman | Jan 1997 | A |
5743711 | Fournier et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5788456 | Maier | Aug 1998 | A |
5807074 | Fournier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6068541 | Dwyer | May 2000 | A |
6196793 | Braaten | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6302648 | Konishi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6435825 | Kirby, III et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6705829 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6754956 | Tomko et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6888090 | Murphy | May 2005 | B2 |
20040253095 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2236338 | Sep 2004 | RU |
831497 | May 1981 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance from RU Application No. 2008134949 dated Oct. 18, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110211946 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11892716 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13106328 | US | |
Parent | 11331024 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11892716 | US |