Welding electrode

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4639576
  • Patent Number
    4,639,576
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 30, 1986
    38 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 27, 1987
    37 years ago
Abstract
A consumable electrode including a core wire and a coating adapted for welding clad steel products. The resulting weld deposit overcomes the problem of iron dilution which tends to degrade the weld when available electrodes are utilized. Such clad products are often exposed to sulfur and acidified chloride environments.
Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
The instant invention relates to the art of welding in general and more particularly to an electrode especially adapted for welding a nickel-base alloy over steel.
BACKGROUND ART
Nickel-base alloys have long enjoyed considerable usage and are known to possess considerable advantages when employed in high temperature environments such as industrial turbines, flue gas scrubbers, jet engines, petrochemical installations, etc. These nickel alloys exhibit excellent high temperature strength characteristics. Moreover, many nickel-base alloys are highly resistant to corrosion normally associated with a wide variety of hot gases and corrosive liquids.
In particular, for specific applications, INCONEL alloy 625 clad steel offers a substantial cost savings over solid INCONEL alloy 625 while exhibiting comparable corrosion resistance to sulfur and acidified, chloride environments. (INCONEL is a trademark of the INCO family of companies.)
However, when available welding electrodes are deposited on INCONEL alloy 625 clad steel, iron dilution from the steel substrate of the cladding can effectively lower the molybdenum content of the weld deposit to the point where it no longer offers corrosion resistance equivalent to the base metal.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, there is provided a welding electrode that provides a sound weld deposit on clad steel products. Even when diluted with iron from the underlying steel, the welding deposit offers equivalent corrosion resistance to that exhibited by the alloy.





PREFERRED MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Assignee of the instant invention manufactures a coated consumable welding electrode called INCONEL Welding Electrode 112. It is employed in shielded metal arc welding operations for joining both nickel-base alloys and carbon steels. However, as alluded to above, this electrode is deficient when welding clad steel.
Compositional data on INCONEL Welding Electrode 112 is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1______________________________________Chemical Composition, %(Deposited Weld Metal)______________________________________Ni.sup.a 55.0 max Si 0.75 maxC 0.10 max Cr 20.0-23.0Mn 1.0 max Cb.sup.b 3.15-4.15Fe 7.0 max Mo 8.0-10.0S 0.02 max P 0.03 max Others 0.50 max______________________________________ .sup.a Plus Co. Co 0.12 max when specified. .sup.b Plus Ta
INCONEL alloy 625 (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,160,500) is a high strength nickel-base alloy resistant to many forms of corrosive attack. Its nominal composition (major components) is given in Table 2.
TABLE 2______________________________________(in weight %)______________________________________Ni balance Fe 0-5%Cr 20-23% Co 0-1%Cb + Ta 3-4% Si 0-0.5%Mo 8-10% Al 0-0.4%C 0-0.1% Ti 0-0.4%______________________________________
Extensive research was undertaken to develop a consumable welding electrode suitable for welding INCONEL alloy 625 clad steel for use in flue gas desulfurization scrubbers. The aggressive environment in these systems can cause debilitating pitting and crevice corrosion attack. It is accepted that molybdenum is effective for increasing the resistance of nickel-base and iron-base alloys to such attack. Indeed INCONEL alloy 625 and INCONEL alloy 625 clad steel are used in this environment. However, when using weld clad steel, the iron dilution from the steel substrate of the clad product lowers the molybdenum content of the weld to the point that it no longer exhibits corrosion resistance equivalent to the base material. Accordingly, different electrode formulations were considered.
As a result of extensive testing, Table 3 lists the chemical composition requirements for undiluted weld metal. An electrode depositing the following weld compositional ranges has been found to successfully weld INCONEL alloy 625 clad steel.
TABLE 3______________________________________ Weight %Element Min Max______________________________________C 0 0.10Mn 0 1.0Fe 0 7.0P 0 0.03S 0 0.02Si 0 0.80Cu 0 0.50Ni 52.0 BalanceCr 20.0 23.0Cb + Ta 0 4.20Mo 11.0 13.0______________________________________
The instant consumable electrode essentially utilizes INCONEL alloy 625 as the core wire and the flux formulation as shown in Table 4. The flux is formulated and deposited on the core wire in the usual manner.
TABLE 4______________________________________Dry Mix (all in weight %) Range Preferred______________________________________Calcium Carbonate 12-40 23Cryolite 10-35 21Titanium Dioxide 10-30 14Magnetite 0-10 3Molybdenum Powder 6-12 10Nickel-Columbium Powder 0-7 up to 7Chromium Powder 0-10 8Nepheline Syenite 0-15 8Zirconium Oxide 0-5 1Periclase 0-5 2Bentonite (extrusion aid) 0-5 3Alginate (extrusion aid) 0-5 0.5Natrosol (extrusion aid) 0-5 0.25Binder (% of weight of Dry Mix above)Sodium Silicate 10-30 24Lithium Silicate 0-2 1.25Water 0-2 0.25______________________________________
The addition of columbium (as nickel columbium) to the flux is optional. When it is added, the columbium level of the deposit falls within the range specified for INCONEL Welding Electrode 112. However, omission of this flux ingredient causes a reduction in the columbium level of the deposit and significantly increases weld ductility.
Average all-weld-metal room temperature mechanical properties are shown below in Table 5.
TABLE 5______________________________________ Rockwell______________________________________UTS 0.2% YS El (%) RA (%) Hardness______________________________________109.2 ksi 77.5 ksi 19.1 22.9 98/100B(753 MPa) (534 MPa)______________________________________
The corrosion properties of the resulting weld were obtained in the following fashion.
A number of 0.25 inch (0.64 cm) thick plates of steel were clad with a single 0.062 inch (0.16 cm) thick layer of INCONEL alloy 625. A variety of gap configurations and a number of weld passes were utilized to make the following specimens. To protect the steel, a backing sheet of INCONEL alloy 625 was applied and the edges were welded.
The various specimens were immersed in a SO.sub.2 saturated (pH<1) 23,750 ppm chloride (as NaCl) solution at 80.degree. C. (176.degree. F.) for 30 days. The testing conditions represent an environment which weldments would reasonably encounter.
Table 6 contains the chemical compositions of the evaluated weld materials. Heats 1,3, and 4 are for purposes of comparison.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS (in weight %)Welding Electrode C Mn Fe S Si Cu Ni Cr Al Ti Mg Co Mo Cb + Ta P W__________________________________________________________________________(1) INCONEL 0.04 0.06 3.87 0.005 0.49 0.12 61.66 21.41 0.067 0.056 0.0015 0.062 8.81 3.53 0.007 -- Welding Electrode 112 (Standard)(2) Instant 0.04 0.04 2.49 0.004 0.48 0.12 59.68 21.72 0.047 0.044 0.0015 0.043 11.96 3.47 0.005 -- Electrode(3) INCONEL 0.04 0.06 1.95 0.002 0.16 0.14 62.79 22.02 0.16 0.26 0.042 0.035 9.05 3.50 0.005 -- Alloy 625 Filler Metal (bare)(4) HASTELLOY* <0.002 0.48 6.08 -- 0.02 0.06 Bal 15.56 -- -- -- 1.22 15.61 -- 0.005 3.73 C-276 Filler Metal (bare)__________________________________________________________________________ *Trademark of Cabot Corporation
Table 7 below lists immersion test data.
The specimens were tested as-produced, with the welds having been stainless steel brushed.
The test solution was prepared by dissolving reagent grade sodium chloride into distilled water. The solution was saturated with SO.sub.2 gas prior to the start of the test and daily (weekdays) thereafter.
Three specimens each were placed in a TEFLON (Trademark of DuPont, E. I., de Nemours & Co., Inc.) cradle suspended in 4.5 L of corrodent contained in a 5 L resin reaction flask fitted with 12" (30.48 cm) Graham condensers.
After 30 days immersion, specimens were cleaned first with BON AMI (Trademark of Faultless Starch Company) and then with methanol and chlorothene.
Specimens were evaluated in terms of mass loss corrosion rates and examined under 20.times. magnification for localized corrosion. Pit depths were measured with a depth gauge where possible. Where surfaces were irregular, pit depths were estimated with a 20.times. microscope scale.
TABLE 7______________________________________Immersion Test Data for INCONEL alloy 625 Clad Steel PlateWith Various Welds, Evaluated in SO.sub.2 Saturated (pH <1)23,750 ppm Chloride (as NaCl) at 80.degree. C. (176.degree. F.) for 30Days Weld- Corro-Speci- ing sion Com-men Elec- Rate mentNum- trode (mpy) Center Weld Edgeber # (1) (2) in Clad Weld Cladding______________________________________1 2 <1 NLC (3) NLC NLC (.03 mm)2 1 <1 NLC NLC NLC3 1 <1 NLC NLC 1 pit 1/16" (1.6 mm) deep (4)4 2 <1 NLC NLC NLC5 1 3 High pit density NLC NLC (.07 mm) up to 1/32" (.8 mm deep)6 2 <1 NLC NLC NLC7 1 <1 NLC NLC NLC8 2 < 1 NLC NLC NLC9 1 <1 NLC NLC NLC10 2 <1 NLC NLC NLC11 3 <1 NLC NLC NLC12 4 <1 NLC NLC NLC______________________________________ (1) See Table 6, Column 1 (2) mpy = mils (thousandths of an inch) per year (3) NLC = No Localized Corrosion was clearly discernable. (4) Adjacent to weld, where a black film from welding was left on the plate.
Specimens 3 and 5 suffered pitting of the backing plate and/or the cladding where a black film from welding with a coated electrode was not completely removed from the specimen by stainless steel brushing. The ferricyanide test indicated that the black film contained significant iron, which could form ferric chloride adjacent to the surface. This would create a severely aggressive, highly localized environment.
Specimen 5 suffered significant pitting in the center weld in the clad. As this weld was made with a standard electrode deposited directly onto steel, the pitting was as expected. Due to the iron dilution in the weld, the Mo content of the weld surface exposed to the environment may be as low as 61/2 to 7%. Specimen 6 was welded similarly and it did not pit.
Specimens 11 and 12, with center welds in the clad of INCONEL Filler Metal 625 and HASTELLOY C-276, respectively, exhibited excellent corrosion resistance. However, these two welding rods are not flux covered and therefore are only useful in situations differing from those contemplated for the instant covered electrode. Rather, they have been utilized herein for comparison purposes.
While in accordance with the provisions of the statute, there is illustrated and described herein specific embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will understand that changes may be made in the form of the invention covered by the claims and that certain features of the invention may sometimes be used to advantage without a corresponding use of the other features.
Claims
  • 1. A consumable electrode for welding a 625 alloy clad steel workpiece, the electrode including a core wire and a coating, the core wire consisting essentially of about 20% to about 23% chromium, about 8% to about 10% molybdenum, up to about 5% iron, up to about 1% cobalt, up to about 0.5% silicon, up to about 0.4% aluminum, up to about 0.4% titanium, about 3% to about 4% columbium plus tantalum, the balance nickel and trace impurities, and the coating consisting essentially of about 10% to about 40% calcium carbonate, about 10% to about 35% cryolite, about 10% to about 30% titanium dioxide, up to about 10% magnetite, about 6% to about 12% molybdenum, up to about 7% nickel-columbium, up to about 10% chromium, up to about 15% nepheline syenite, up to about 5% zirconium oxide, up to about 5% periclase, up to about 5% extrusion aids, and a binder.
  • 2. The electrode according to claim 1 wherein a resulting weld deposit consists essentially of about 20% to about 23% chromium, about 11% to about 13% molybdenum, up to about 4.2% columbium plus tantalum, up to about 1% manganese, up to about 7% iron, up to about 0.8% silicon, up to about 0.5% copper, the balance nickel and trace elements.
  • 3. The weld deposit according to claim 2 wherein the deposit consists essentially of about 22% chromium, about 12% molybdenum, about 3.5% columbium plus tantalum, about 2.5% iron, about 0.5% silicon, about 0.1% copper, the balance nickel and trace elements.
  • 4. The coating according to claim 1 consisting essentially of about 23% calcium carbonate, about 21% cryolite, about 14% titanium dioxide, about 3% magnetite, about 10% molybdenum, up to about 7% nickel-columbium, about 8% chromium, about 8% nepheline syenite, about 1% zirconium oxide, about 2% periclase, and about 4% extrusion aids.
  • 5. A weld deposit affixed to a nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy clad steel article, the weld deposit consisting essentially of about 20% to about 23% chromium, about 11% to about 13% molybdenum, up to about 4.2% columbium plus tantalum, up to about 1% manganese, up to about 7% iron, up to about 0.8% silicon, up to about 0.5% copper, the balance nickel and trace elements.
  • 6. A steel workpiece cladded with a nickel-base alloy including a welded deposit affixed to the cladding, the cladding consisting essentially of about 20% to about 23% chromium, about 3% to about 4% columbium plus titanium, about 8% to about 10% molybdenum, up to about 5% iron, up to about 0.5% manganese, up to about 0.4% aluminum, up to about 0.4% titanium, up to about 0.5% silicon, up to about 1% cobalt, the balance nickel and trace elements and the welded deposit consisting essentially of about 20% to about 23% chromium, about 11% to about 13% molybdenum, up to about 4.2% columbium plus tantalum, up to about 1% manganese, up to about 7% iron, up to about 0.8% silicon, up to about 0.5% copper, the balance nickel and trace elements.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 714,988 filed on Mar. 22, 1985, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
2626339 Wasserman Jan 1953
3181970 Peck et al. May 1965
4355224 Mesick et al. Oct 1982
4426428 Kammer et al. Jan 1984
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
46368 Feb 1982 EPX
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 714988 Mar 1985