The present invention relates to a magnetic pulse welding device, and more particularly to a magnetic pulse welding head having a split coil design, thereby allowing opening and closing of the welding head around the welding point.
The magnetic pulse welding (MPW) or forming process utilizes electromagnetic energy to create a metallurgical bound at molecular level without melting the materials to be joined. It was first developed in the 1970s and was disclosed in;
The MPW process is based on well-established electromagnetic theory and is suitable for joining thin-walled tubular structures with either solid mandrels, or with other tubular elements. The concept is based upon deformation of an electrically conductive tubular element having a certain amount of plastic deformation capability. The other element to be joined with the tubular element can be of another material, even a non electrically conductive material. If two tubular parts are to be joined, then one tube is inserted into the other tubular element, preferably with as less play as possible between contact surfaces, forming a lap type of joint, and then applying an electromagnetic pulse over this lap joint.
The passage of a high current discharge from the MPW power source trough a specially designed coil and field shaper assembly creates an induction current (eddy current) in the conductive outer tubular element. Interactions of the electromagnetic fields associated with the primary discharge current and the eddy current results in a repulsion force (the “Lorenz” force) between the coil and the outer tubular element. The magnitude of the repulsion force is approximately proportional to the square of the discharge current.
The MPW process is designed to create a repulsion force powerful enough to cause the outer tubular element impacting the inner tubular member at a velocity that is sufficiently high, in the range of several hundred meters per second (Kojima, M; Tamaki, K; Suzuki, J; and Sasaki K; “Flow stress, collision velocity and collision acceleration in electromagnetic welding. ” Quarterly Journal of the Japan Welding Society, 7(1), pp 75-81, 1989), for localized deformation and subsequent bonding.
Fundamentally, the MPW process follows the same physics principles as the electromagnetic forming process see;
However, the MPW process may require a much higher repulsion force to generate sufficient velocity for bonding.
The MPW process is particularly useful in making strong metallurgical bond between dissimilar materials such as aluminum to steel, a task that is generally impossible with traditional welding processes. The MPW technology will have broad commercial applications in a number of industries including automotive, aerospace, appliance, electronic and telecommunications. Especially in the automotive and aerospace technology will MPW provide means for manufacturing light-weight chassis using tubular frames.
The MPW technology will potentially revolutionize the assembly process of hydro formed tubular structures in next generation energy efficient automotive vehicles. It can become a critical technology, enabling materials joining technology to promote hybrid automotive body structure design that uses aluminum alloys and steels. In addition, MPW welding is ideal to replace certain brazing and soldering operations of tubes and electrical connectors, thus eliminating a number of environmental concerns associated with brazing such as energy consumption, use of hazardous chemicals, and costly recycling of lead containing brazed parts.
Since the invention of the MPW process, the conventional design of the induction coil has been a closed electrical loop encircling the point of welding, i.e. encircling the tubular element to be welded. Similar to a solenoid in principle, the closed coil design provides a closed loop for passage of the discharge current around the tubular part to be welded. The looped path was considered to be necessary for the generation of the repulsion force for sufficient bonding. The welded assembly could only be removed axially from the closed coil of the welding head, which meant that welding of closed tubular structures was impossible, i.e. structures similar to toroids and similar closed tubular structures.
Different proposals for welding heads of this conventional closed coil design are shown in;
The closed coil design has imposed significant restrictions in application areas for the MPW technology. The restrictions apply for closed tubular structures where the welding head could not be removed after the welding process. In some applications the shape of hydro formed tubes are quite complex, preventing a physical removal of the welding head after welding. Therefore the coil of the welding head needs to be redesigned so that weld heads could be quickly opened and closed allowing the loading and unloading of the hydro formed tubes.
Some attempts have been made to design a weld head that could be opened and closed much like clamshell halves, utilizing conducting surfaces between halves closing the electric discharge path of the coils.
However, if the electric current for exciting the coils is passed via such conducting surfaces they will be exposed to excessive wear and will be destroyed during operation due to arcing of electrical current. The electrical current developed for MPW needs to approach 1 mega ampere of current during the 100 microseconds that it takes to make the weld, all without excessive heating. The contact surfaces have to be “perfect”, i.e. with no air gaps or oxidation which may cause arcing during operation. The welding head needs to withstand some 100.000 welds for economic feasibility of the process.
An example with clamshell like opening of coils over welding position is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,125. This solution show two separate coils positioned in tandem along the axis of the coils, but where only one coil is connected to a power source, while the second coil is simply only a stand-alone coil which reflects a countercurrent pulse. However, this design also does not utilize a magnetic field in the volume encircled by the coil inner surface, where the magnetic field is most intensified.
Another solution with dual coils is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,875,964, where two coils mounted in each weld head half are connected in series, using a connecting pin for connecting coils together. The problem with arcing in the connecting surfaces of this connecting pin will still create problems, and coils could not be controlled individually. Here are the two halves also totally encircling the welding position which makes it impossible to use in designs having neighboring tubular elements close to the welding position.
What is needed is a MPW head that could be opened and closed quickly allowing loading and unloading of work pieces without having to pull out the weld head over the entire length of the work piece. Further, the problem with arcing should be avoided in contact surfaces extending service life of the weld head and thus the economical feasibility of the process. Yet another problem is to be able to weld tubular elements in designs having several tubular elements located close to one another.
It is an object of the present invention to prevent the problems in existing solutions.
According to the invention are two independent coils with their own power supply used in two weld head halves that easily could be opened and closed over the welding position.
Another advantage of the invention is that no electrical connectors for conducting high-ampere currents are needed to be connected for exiting the coils, which will dramatically improve service operation of the weld head.
Yet another advantage is the use of kidney-shaped coil housing that both concentrated the magnetic pulse towards the welding position as well as better access to the weld position if it is problematic to apply the weld head all around, i.e. totally encircling, the welding position.
In the following a preferred embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to the attached drawing, in which
As seen in
Similar parts in upper and lower weld head half in figure are numbered with same numbers but with appendix “a” if located in upper half and with appendix “b” if located in lower half.
The design with two independent weld head halves enable the weld head to be moved into and out of contact with the welding position of the work piece located in the work piece receiving zone 16. Each weld head half includes at least one coil winding 12a/12b, which have ends 20a,22a/20b,22b connected to an electrical power source PSa/PSb.
In the figure the coil windings are located in a coil housing 13a and 13b respectively that have a kidney-shaped form corresponding to the same kidney-shaped form of the coil windings 12a and 12b respectively. The coil windings are preferably made with a coil wire of substantial cross section and with as low electrical resistance as possible, and in this case with as few coil turns as 5-10, or as shown in figure with only 6 coil turns. As the induction coil should be activated very quickly and develop high current, the electrical inductance as well as resistance should be kept low. Each coil winding 12a/12b is made by a highly conductive metal such as aluminum or copper, enclosing a coil cavity within the coil housing 13a and 13b. The entire coil housing 13a/13b could be molded or casted in one piece, by a resinous- epoxy- or other polymeric material, forming the kidney-shaped outer contour. The coil cavity and interspaces between coil windings could also be filled with an iron core in either solid or laminated structure (not shown in figures).
The abutting contacting surfaces 14 is preferably provided with an electrically insulating coating applied in any appropriate manner. This coating may also be provided in the contact surface between the work piece and the weld head half.
Such an insulating interface in contact surfaces 14 reduces the opportunity for creating arching and thus erosion/wear of the contact surfaces, as well as mechanical load on coils when sudden arching occurs. An insulating layer is applied to at least one of the contact surfaces.
In
The shaper is integrated with a connecting member 17a/17b that permanently connects the shaper with the associated weld head housing. The upper weld head half 10a thus consist of the kidney-shaped coil housing 13a, the connecting member 17a and the shaper 15a. The power source PSa is preferably connected to the upper weld head connections 22a and 20a via any suitable flexible electrical conductors. The connecting member 17a/17b may preferably be made in a low resistance conductive material such as copper, aluminum or steel.
In
When welding head halves are brought together for welding, as shown in
The kidney-shaped coil housing 13a and 13b is further located between an outer arc length L1 and an inner arc length L2 of said circular sector, said outer arc length being located radially outside of and adjacent to the convex coil surfaces 31a, 31b and the inner arc length being located radially inside of and adjacent to the concave coil surfaces 32a,32b.
By this design could access be made possible to both closed tubular structures as well as tubular profiles located closely together.
In
In
Alternatively, as shown in
In yet another embodiment, as shown in
In
However, the type of coil winding and if a solid or laminated iron core is used is a matter of optimization of the electromagnetic field as directed towards the shaper, and may thus be modified in a number of ways.
It is to be understood that the above description and the related figures are only intended to illustrate the present solution. Thus, the solution is not restricted only to the embodiment described above and defined in the claims, but many different variations and modifications, which are possible within the scope of the idea defined in the attached claims, will be obvious to a person skilled in the art.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2014/050947 | 8/18/2014 | WO | 00 |