This invention is directed to well bore conditioning and stabilizing devices and systems. Specifically, the invention is directed to well bore conditioning and stabilizing devices and systems that maximize both well bore contact and flow area.
Stabilizers are common within the well bore drilling industry. A drilling stabilizer is a piece of downhole equipment used in the bottom hole assembly (BHA) of a drill string. Roller stabilizers are typically placed in the drill string a short distance above the motor. Stabilizers mechanically stabilize the BHA in the borehole in order to avoid unintentional sidetracking, reduce or eliminate vibrations that originate at the drill bit from traveling up the rest of the drill string, and ensure the quality of the hole being drilled. As shown in
A desirable feature in a stabilizer is 360-degree contact between the tool and the bore walls. However, a competing desirable feature is for the tool to allow plenty of flow area through the stabilizing features. Therefore, in designing stabilizers, one must balance the percentage of contact between the tool and the bore walls with the amount of flow the tool allows. Furthermore, it is desirable to have a tool that can fit through the well bore yet maximizes contact with the well bore.
The present invention overcomes the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and designs and provides new tools and systems for conditioning and stabilizing drill strings during drilling well bores.
One embodiment of the invention is directed to a drill string stabilizer. The drill string stabilizer comprises a tubular body and at least two stabilizing elements protruding from the exterior of the tubular body. The at least two stabilizing elements are angularly offset from each other around the circumference of the tubular body.
Preferably, each stabilizing element further comprises at least one well bore contacting surface. In a preferred embodiment, each well bore contacting surface is a polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) surface. Preferably, the stabilizing elements are separated by a plenum.
Preferably, the at least two stabilizing elements together provide 360° contact with a well bore and each stabilizing element provides an open line-of-sight path through the stabilizing elements. The drill string stabilizer preferably further comprises protrusions extending from each of the at least two stabilizing elements. Preferably, the at least two stabilizing elements are angularly offset from each other such that the protrusions of one stabilizing element is not in line with the protrusions of another stabilizing element. In a preferred embodiment, a pass-through diameter of the stabilizer is smaller than a gauge diameter of the stabilizer.
Preferably, the at least two stabilizing elements are eccentrically positioned on the tubular body. Preferably, there are two stabilizing elements and the two stabilizing elements are diametrically opposed to each other around the tubular body. In a preferred embodiment, each stabilizing element is comprised of a race with a roller within the race. Preferably, the rollers are able to freely rotate within the races. The drill string stabilizer preferably further comprises a bearing positioned between the race and the roller. Preferably, each stabilizing element is comprised of a stationary wear pad.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a bottom hole assembly (BHA). The BHA comprises a well bore drill and drill string stabilizer. The drill string stabilizer comprises a tubular body and at least two stabilizing elements protruding from the exterior of the tubular body. The at least two stabilizing elements are angularly offset from each other around the circumference of the tubular body and the drill string stabilizer is adapted to condition the well bore and reduce vibrations caused by the well bore drill.
In a preferred embodiment, each stabilizing element further comprises at least one well bore contacting surface. Preferably, each well bore contacting surface is a polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) surface. The stabilizing elements are preferably separated by a plenum.
Preferably, the at least two stabilizing elements together provide 360° contact with a well bore and each stabilizing element provides an open line-of-sight path through the stabilizing elements. Preferably further comprising protrusions extending from each of the at least two stabilizing elements. In a preferred embodiment, the at least two stabilizing elements are angularly offset from each other such that the protrusions of one stabilizing element is not in line with the protrusions of another stabilizing element. Preferably, a pass-through diameter of the stabilizer is smaller than a gauge diameter of the stabilizer.
In a preferred embodiment, the at least two stabilizing elements are eccentrically positioned on the tubular body. There are preferably two stabilizing elements and the two stabilizing elements are diametrically opposed to each other around the tubular body. Preferably, each stabilizing element is comprised of a race with a roller within the race. Preferably, the rollers are able to freely rotate within the races. In a preferred embodiment, the at least two stabilizing elements further comprise a bearing positioned between the race and the roller. Preferably, each stabilizing element is comprised of a stationary wear pad.
Other embodiments and advantages of the invention are set forth in part in the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from this description, or may be learned from the practice of the invention.
One way to maximize both contact area and flow area of the stabilizer is to spiral the stabilizing structures. However, the suitability of the flow area is often judged by end users by looking for an open line-of-sight path through the features. A spiral that is too long or twists too tightly (which would not provide an open line-of-sight path) is believed to encourage the buildup of cuttings and will result in blockage of the flow area.
As shown in
Preferably lobes 105A and 105B are identical. However, lobes 105A and 105B may be similar or different. Lobes 105A and 105B preferably have 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more spiraled protrusions. The protrusions on each lobe may spiral in the same direction or opposite directions. Preferably, the protrusions are equally spaced about the drill string. However, the protrusions may be eccentric or have another distribution. Between each protrusion is preferably a gap to allow the flow of drilling fluid and cuttings. At least a portion of the protrusions have cutters 115 extending from them. Cutters 115 clean up roughness in the well bore as the tool moves by, and also ensure the bore will have the proper fit against the stabilizing features. Preferably, cutters 115 cover at least a portion of each protrusion. However, cutters 115 may cover all of each protrusion. Preferably, cutters 115 are positioned so that the cutting face is tangential to the drill string. Cutters 115 are preferably polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) surfaces. However, the cutters may be another material.
A second embodiment of the invention is directed to a stabilizer 500 with two eccentric rollers 550A and 550B. To keep rollers 550A and 550B in contact with the well bore 560, as shown in
Furthermore, as can be seen in
Preferably, each roller or stabilizing element 550A and 550B is eccentrically positioned such that the axis, 552A and 552B, of the roller 550A, 550B, respectively, is offset a first fixed distance 553A and a second fixed distance 553B, respectively, from the axis of stabilizer 500. Preferably the eccentricity of each roller is diametrically opposed about stabilizer 500 from the other roller. However, in other embodiments, the eccentricity of each roller may be at a different angle from the other roller. For example, the rollers may be 90°, 45°, 135°, or another angle apart. While two rollers a shown, in some embodiment, more than 2 rollers are employed at various positions. In embodiments where large rollers are not possible, two or more small eccentric rollers may be employed. In other embodiments where rollers are not possible, two or more eccentric wear pads may be used instead. Rollers 550A and 550B and the associated bearings are preferably large compared to traditional roller stabilizers (see
It is contemplated that aspects of any embodiment described herein can be employed in any other embodiment described herein. Furthermore, embodiments can be combined in any orientation. Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. All references cited herein, including all publications, U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, are specifically and entirely incorporated by reference. The term comprising, where ever used, is intended to include the terms consisting and consisting essentially of. Furthermore, the terms comprising, including, and containing are not intended to be limiting. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only with the true scope and spirit of the invention indicated by the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 62/556,379, filed Sep. 9, 2017, and 62/649,666, filed Mar. 29, 2018, both entitled “Well Bore Conditioner and Stabilizer,” and both hereby specifically and entirely incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1489849 | Sidney et al. | Apr 1924 | A |
1772491 | Koppl | Aug 1930 | A |
3231033 | Williams | Jan 1966 | A |
3237705 | Williams | Mar 1966 | A |
3391749 | Arnold | Jul 1968 | A |
3561549 | Garrison | Feb 1971 | A |
3575247 | Feenstra | Apr 1971 | A |
3851719 | Thompson | Dec 1974 | A |
3916998 | Bass | Nov 1975 | A |
3982594 | Berthiaume | Sep 1976 | A |
4080010 | Young | Mar 1978 | A |
4156374 | Shwayder | May 1979 | A |
4610307 | Jurgens | Sep 1986 | A |
4729438 | Walker | Mar 1988 | A |
4807708 | Forrest | Feb 1989 | A |
4989681 | Lohmuller | Feb 1991 | A |
5186265 | Henson | Feb 1993 | A |
5372351 | Oliver | Oct 1994 | A |
5495899 | Pastusek | Mar 1996 | A |
5497842 | Pastusek | Mar 1996 | A |
5667027 | Poffenroth | Sep 1997 | A |
5735359 | Lee | Apr 1998 | A |
5765653 | Doster | Jun 1998 | A |
5957223 | Doster | Sep 1999 | A |
5992548 | Silva | Nov 1999 | A |
6039130 | Pruet | Mar 2000 | A |
RE36817 | Pastusek | Aug 2000 | E |
6109374 | Burca et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116356 | Doster | Sep 2000 | A |
6213226 | Eppink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227312 | Eppink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257279 | Peltz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6386302 | Beaton | May 2002 | B1 |
6397958 | Charles | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6488104 | Eppink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494272 | Eppink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6607371 | Raymond et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609580 | Beaton | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622803 | Harvey | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6695080 | Presley | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6732817 | Dewey | May 2004 | B2 |
6920944 | Eppink | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6973974 | McLoughlin | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991046 | Fielder | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7650952 | Evans | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7901137 | Peterson | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8752649 | Isenhour | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8813877 | Short | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8851205 | Short | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9145746 | Smith | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9163460 | Isenhour | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9273519 | Smith | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9739092 | Isenhour | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20010045306 | Fielder et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020020526 | Male et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056574 | Harvey | May 2002 | A1 |
20020125047 | Beaton | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020166703 | Presley | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030173114 | Presley | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030221873 | Beaton | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040099448 | Fielder | May 2004 | A1 |
20040206552 | Beaton | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060207801 | Clayton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070163810 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20100018779 | Makkar | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100078216 | Radford | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089659 | Chafai | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100116556 | Buske | May 2010 | A1 |
20110127044 | Radford | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110220416 | Rives | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120057814 | Dodson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120255786 | Isenhour | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120279784 | Harvey | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130180779 | Isenhour | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130233620 | Rankin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140064646 | Meier | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140131111 | Desmette | May 2014 | A1 |
20150129309 | Anderson | May 2015 | A1 |
20170241207 | Meier | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190226285 | Teodorescu | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
219959 | Apr 1987 | EP |
1039095 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2008026011 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009123918 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT App. No. PCT/US18/050208, dated Nov. 8, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 20, 2018 for corresponding PCT/US2018/055230. |
International Patentability Report for PCT/US13/050205 dated Dec. 23, 2013. |
International Patentability Report for PCT/US12/58573 dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary entry for “borehole”, accessed Aug. 12, 2013 via www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com. |
Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary entry for “Ream” and “Underreamer”, accessed May 22, 2013 via www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com. |
PCT/US2012/032714; Search Report in International Patent Application of Isenhour, James; Jun. 20, 2012. |
Plaintiff's Complaint; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Oct. 4, 2011. |
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc. vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Oct. 4, 2011. |
Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc. vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Jun. 1, 2012. |
Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff' Second Amended Complaint & Counterclaims; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc. vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Jun. 15, 2012. |
Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim and Answer to Cross Claim; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc. vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Jun. 25, 2012. |
Defendant's Initial Disclosures; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc. vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Jun. 30, 2012. |
Plaintiff's Disclosure Statement; James D. Isenhour, Hard Rock Solutions Inc. vs Lot William Short, Jr., Short Bit & Tool Co., Civil Action No. 11CV1305, Colorado District Court, Larimer County; Aug. 2, 2012. |
Short Bit & Tool Co.; Photograph of TCS Reamer; Apr. 2011. |
Short Bit & Tool Co.; Photograph of BCS Tandem and TCS Reamer; Feb. 11, 2011. |
Baker Hughes; “RWD2 Ream-While-Drilling”; http://www.bakerhughes.com/products-and-services/drilling/d rill-bit-systems/hole-enlargemenUrwd2-ream-while-drilling; 2012. |
OTS International; “TPXR Eccentric Reamers”; http://www.otsintl.corn/tpxr.asp; 2012. |
OTS International; “TPXR Eccentric Tool for Underreaming Operations”; http://www.otsintl.com/TPXR.pdf; 2012. |
Schlumberger; “Diamond-Enhanced Insert Reamer”; http://www.slb.com/services/drilling/tools_services/reamers_stabilizers/diamond_enhanced_reamer.a spx;2012. |
National Oilwell Varco; “Eccentric String Tools (ES)”; http://www.nov.com/Brands/ReedHvcaloq/Eccentric Strinq Tools.aspx; 2012. |
Stabil Drill; “Ghost Reamer”; http://www.stabildrill.com/products/ghost_reamer/; 2011. |
Schlumberger; “Quad-D Reamer”; http://www.slb.com/services/drilling/tools services/underreamers/quad d reamer.aspx; 2012. |
OTS International; “TP Bits”; http://www.otsintl.com/tp.asp; 2012. |
OTS International; “TP Series Hyper-Stable PDC Bits”; http://www.otsintl.com/TP-Series-Bits.pdf; 2012. |
National Oilwell Varco; “NOV Downhole—Right Tool, Right Place, Right Time” catalog; http://www.petroleumclub.ro/downloads/07 Tony Watts NOV ReedHycalog.pdf; 2012. |
Offshore; “Drilling Operations, Reaming-while-drilling keys effort to reduce tripping of long drillstrings”; http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/prinUvolume-56/issue-4/departments/drilling-production/drilling-operations-reaming-while-drilling-keys-effort-to-reduce-tripping-of-long-drillstrings.html; 2012. |
Varel International; “Hole Opening Bits—Bicenter Technology”; http://www.varelintl.com/Oil and Gas Home/PDC Drill Bits/Hole Opener Bicenter Bits/; 2012. |
Omni Oil Technologies; “Group II—OMNI Versaltile Drilling Reamer/Stabilizer”; http://www.omnioiltech.com/qroup2.php; 2012. |
Tercel Oilfield Products; “Versatile Drilling Reamer (VDR)”; http://www.terceloilfield.com/en/drilling-enhancement-vd r. php; 2012. |
Sep. 3, 2019 Office Action issued in CN 201810945033.1. |
Dictionary definition of “similar”, accessed May 22, 2013 via thefreedictionary.com. |
Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary entry for “measurements while drilling” accessed Mar. 25, 2019 via www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com. |
Third Party Submission of References filed in unrelated U.S. Appl. No. 16/256,690. The submission provides a concise description of the noted references relative to U.S. Appl. No. 16/256,690, filed Jan. 24, 2020. |
Uyen Partin et al., IADC/SPE 128161—Advanced Modeling Technology: Optimizing Bit-Reamer Interaction Leads to Performance Step-Change in Hole Enlargement While Drilling (IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held New Orleans, LA, Feb. 2-4, 2010)(also available at onepetro.org). |
Hal Edwards et al., SPE 158920—Modeling System Improves Salt Drilling Technique with Concentric Reamer/RSS, Deepwater GOM (SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held San Antonio, TX Oct. 8-10, 2012) (also available at onepetro.org). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190078399 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62556379 | Sep 2017 | US | |
62649666 | Mar 2018 | US |