Claims
- 1. A method of drilling a new well to avoid colliding with an existing wellbore, said method comprising the steps:
- (a) planning a drilling path for said new well;
- (b) for each of 1 through N segments of said drilling path, determining a gross probability (PGROSS) that a projection of said segment onto a plane will intersect a projection of a corresponding segment of said existing wellbore onto said plane;
- (c) for each of said 1 through N segments of said planned drilling path, (i) determining an area of overlap between said projection onto said plane of said segment and a projection onto said plane of an upper adjacent segment of said planned drilling path (planned segment overlapped area), (ii) determining for each corresponding segment of said existing wellbore, an area of overlap between a projection onto said plane of said corresponding segment and a projection onto said plane of an upper adjacent segment of said existing wellbore (existing segment overlapped area), and (iii) determining an overlapped probability (POVERLAPPED) that said planned segment overlapped area will intersect said existing segment overlapped area; and
- (d) for each of said I through N segments of said planned drilling path, calculating a net probability (PNET) that said segment will intersect said corresponding segment of said existing wellbore equal to (PGROSS-POVERLAPPED); and
- (e) calculating a probability that said drilling path will intersect said existing wellbore equal to (PNET (1)+PNET (2)+ . . . +PNET(N));
- (f) if said probability indicates that said drilling path will intersect said existing wellbore, re-planning said drilling path and return to step (b); and
- (g) drilling said new well along said drilling path.
- 2. The method of claim 1 in which a computer program is used to implement steps (a) through (f).
- 3. The method of claim 2 in which input parameters for said computer program comprise distance between said drilling path and said existing wellbore, survey uncertainty, drilling uncertainty, survey interval, well diameter, and intersection angle.
- 4. A method of determining a probability that a planned drilling path will intersect an existing wellbore, said method comprising the steps:
- (a) for each of 1 through N segments of said planned drilling path, determining a gross probability (PGROSS) that a projection of said segment onto a plane will intersect a projection of a corresponding segment of said existing wellbore onto said plane;
- (b) for each of said 1 through N segments of said planned drilling path, (i) determining an area of overlap between said projection onto said plane of said segment and a projection onto said plane of an upper adjacent segment of said planned drilling path (planned segment overlapped area), (ii) determining for each corresponding segment of said existing wellbore, an area of overlap between a projection onto said plane of said corresponding segment and a projection onto said plane of an upper adjacent segment of said existing wellbore (existing segment overlapped area), and (iii) determining an overlapped probability (POVERLAPPED) that said planned segment overlapped area will intersect said existing segment overlapped area; and
- (c) for each of said 1 through N segments of said planned drilling path, calculating a net probability (PNET) that said segment will intersect said corresponding segment of said existing wellbore equal to (PGROSS-POVERLAPPED); and
- (d) calculating said probability that said planned drilling path will intersect said existing wellbore equal to (PNET (1)+PNET (2)+ . . . +PNET(N)).
Parent Case Info
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/020,411 filed Jun. 25, 1996.
US Referenced Citations (6)
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry |
"Quantative Risk Assessment of Subsurface Well Collisions," J.L. Thorogood, F.G. Tourney, F.K. Crawley, and G. Woo, SPE 20908, (pp 265-272) Oct. 1990. |
"Application of Risk Analysis Methods to Subsurface Well Collisions," J.L. Thorogood, T.W. Hogg, and H.S. Williamson SPE Drilling Engineering, (pp 299-304) Dec. 1991. |