This disclosure relates, in general, to testing and evaluation of subterranean formation fluids.
In drilling subterranean wells, testing is performed to obtain a fluid sample from the formation to, among other things, determine the composition of the formation fluids. In this testing, efforts are taken to obtain a sample of the formation fluid that is representative of the fluids as they exist in the formation. In a typical sampling procedure, a sample of the formation fluids may be obtained by lowering a sampling tool having a sampling chamber into the wellbore on a conveyance, such as a wireline, slick line, coiled tubing, jointed tubing or the like. When the sampling tool reaches the desired depth, one or more ports are opened to allow collection of the formation fluids. Once the ports are opened, formation fluids travel through the ports and a sample of the formation fluids are collected within a sampling chamber of the sampling tool. After the sample has been collected, the sampling tool is withdrawn from the wellbore so that the formation fluid sample may be analyzed.
As the fluid sample is retrieved to the surface, the temperature of the fluid sample tends to decrease causing shrinkage of the fluid sample and a reduction in the pressure of the fluid sample. These changes can cause the fluid sample to approach or reach saturation pressure, creating the possibility of flashing entrained gasses present in the fluid sample and subsequent asphaltene deposition. Once such a process occurs, the resulting fluid sample is no longer representative of the fluids present in the formation. Therefore, a need has arisen for obtaining a fluid sample from a formation without degradation of the sample during retrieval of the sampling tool from the wellbore. A need has also arisen for maintaining the integrity of the fluid sample during storage on the surface
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring initially to
The sampler 18 selectively operates to open, receive well fluid into one or more sampling chambers, and then close for transport of the well fluid sample to the surface. Circulating valve 20 selectively permits and prevents flow between bore 16 and an annulus 26 between tubular string 12 and wellbore 14. The tester valve 22 selectively permits and prevents flow through bore 16. Choke 24 selectively restricts flow through tubular string 12. In certain instances, sampler 18, valves 20, 22 and choke 24 may be operated by a remote signal, including; by a pressure signal (e.g., manipulating pressure in annulus 26 from the surface), by an electrical signal, by an acoustic signal, or by another type of signal, and each need not respond to the same type of signal.
Notably, in other instances, the sampler 18 could be conveyed through bore 16 using a wire (e.g., wireline, e-line, slickline) or coiled tubing. The configuration of wellbore 14 shown in
Referring now to
The one or more of the sampling chambers 102 are installed within exteriorly disposed chamber receiving slots 159 arrayed around the internal fluid bore 112 of carrier 104. A seal bore 160 (see
In addition to the sampling chambers 102 installed within carrier 104, a pressure and temperature gauge/recorder 103 can also be received in carrier 104 in a similar manner. In an example with ten slots 159 occupied by seven sampling chambers 102, pressure and temperature gauge/recorders 103 can occupy the remaining three slots 159. Seal bores 168, 170 in carrier 104 provide communication between one of the gauge/recorders 103 and internal fluid bore 112, so that the one gauge/recorder 103 can measure pressure and temperature of the fluids in the bore 112. Another of the gauge/recorders 103 can be configured to measure pressure and temperature of fluids in the annulus around the sampler 100. Finally, another of the gauge/recorders 103 is configured to measure pressure (and temperature, if desired) from passage 172 via bore 166, and thus measure characteristics of the pressure source 108 (discussed in more detail below). The gauge/recorders 103 can be coupled to a downhole telemetry system for communicating pressure and temperature readings to the surface, concurrently as readings are being taken (e.g., in real time and/or without substantial delay). In other instances, fewer or more gauge/recorders 103 can be provided. For example, in certain instances, one or both of the gauge/recorders 103 measuring the pressure and temperature in bore 112 or in the annulus is omitted.
Passage 172 is in communication with the sample chambers 102 and chamber 174 of pressure source 108. Chamber 174 is in communication with chamber 176 of pressure source 108 via a passage 178. Chambers 174, 176 initially contain a pressurized fluid, such as a compressed gas or liquid. In certain instances, compressed nitrogen at between about 7,000 psi and 12,000 psi is in chambers 174, 176, but other fluids or combinations of fluids and/or other pressures both higher and lower could be used, if desired. Even though
The actuator 106 includes multiple valves 184 operated in response to a remote signal, for example via the telemetry system, to provide for separate actuation of multiple sampling chambers 102. In certain instances, the sampling chambers 102 can be divided up into groups of sampling chambers and the sampling chambers 102 in each group, actuated concurrently. In the example with nine sampling chambers 102, in certain instances, the chambers 102 can be actuated in three groups of three chambers 102 each. If actuated in groups, one valve 184 can be associated with each group of sampling chambers 102 to actuate the chambers 102 in the group concurrently.
For each group of sampling chambers 102, valve 184 initially isolates a bore 164, which is in communication with the group of the sampling chambers 102 via passage 196, from internal fluid bore 112 of fluid sampler 100. This isolates sample chamber 102 in each of the group of sampling chambers 102 from bore 112. When it is desired to receive a fluid sample into a group of the sample chambers 114, a remote signal is provided into the well, via the telemetry system, to actuate the valves 184 and open the bore 164. Fluid from bore 112 then enters each of the three sampling chambers 102.
After the sampling chambers 102 receive fluid from bore 112, pressure in pressure source 108 is applied to chambers 102 to apply pressure to the fluid sample received in the chambers 102. The fluid sample and the pressure from the pressure source 108 are then sealed in separate, but pressure communicating chambers. The pressure in pressure source 108 is thus able to act on the fluid sample and preserve the fluid sample in the sampling chambers 102 above a specified pressure, e.g., above the saturation pressure of the fluid sample. Each time the pressure source 108 is operated to supply pressure to the sampling chambers 102, the pressure in the pressure source 108 drops.
In the illustrated example, the same pressure source 108 is used for all the fluid samples taken. That is, pressure source 108 is in communication with each of the multiple sampling chambers 102. Once all the samples are obtained and pressurized downhole, fluid sampler 100 is retrieved to the surface. Even though the fluid samples may cool as withdrawn to the surface, the common pressure source maintains the samples at a suitable pressure to prevent any phase change degradation. Once on the surface, the sample may remain in the multiple sampling chambers 102 for a considerable time during which temperature conditions may fluctuate. Accordingly, a surface pressure source, such a compressor or a pump, may be used to supercharge the sampling chambers 102. This supercharging process allows multiple sampling chambers 102 to be further pressurized at the same time with sampling chambers 102 remaining in carrier 104 or after sampling chambers 102 have been removed from carrier 104.
Referring now to
When control module 198 determines that an appropriate signal, addressed to one or more of the valves 184, has been received by communicator 199, control module 198 actuates the addressed valves 184 to open, thereby causing fluid samples to be taken in corresponding fluid chambers 102. Likewise, the sensors of the gauge/recorder 103 can be monitored to provide measurements of pressure and temperature through control module 198 and communicator 199 to a location remote from the fluid sampler 100, e.g. a computer 200 outside of the well. The measurements can be communicated via the communicator 199 concurrently as readings are being taken (e.g., in real time and/or without substantial delay), and can be pushed by the controller 198 or can be provided in response to a remote query.
Information from the sensors 186 of the gauge/recorder 103 can be used to determine whether the sampling chambers 102 have been operated to collect a sample. The pressure in the pressure source 108 will drop each time the pressure source 108 is used to supply pressure to a sampling chamber 102. For example, a human operator and/or the computer 200 outside of the well can watch the pressure readings from the pressure source 108 for a change in pressure of specified amount. The specified amount can correspond to the expected pressure change in the pressure source 108 when it supplies pressure to a sampling chamber or a group of sampling chambers 102. The operator and/or computer 200 can look for changes in pressure for each sampling chamber 102 or group of sampling chambers 102 operated, to determine that one, multiple or all of the sampling chambers 102 have operated. Since the readings from the sensors 186 can be communicated concurrently as they are being taken, the operator will know that the sampling chambers 102 and how many sampling chambers 102 have operated while the fluid sampler 100 is still in the well. If the sampling was unsuccessful, the operator can re-signal the sampling chambers 102 or signal a second group of sampling chambers 102 to re-attempt the sampling. Notably, the operator does not have to trip the fluid sampler 100 out of the well to determine that a sample collection step was unsuccessful, nor does the operator have to trip the fluid sampler 100 back into the well to take another sample.
In addition to determining that operation of the sampling chamber 102 was successful, the operator can obtain an indication of the type of sample taken by the sampling chamber 102 based on the readings from the pressure sensor 186. Prior to operation, the contents and initial conditions (e.g., pressure and temperature) of sampling chambers 102 and the pressure source 108 are known. Similarly, the conditions (e.g., pressure and temperature) of the fluids at the sampling location are known or can be measured by in-well sensors 186. By measuring the change in pressure in the pressure source 108 as the sampling chambers 102 are operated, the operator and/or the computer 200 can back calculate the change in pressure due to the compression of the sample in the sampling chamber 102, and by comparison of this compressibility to known characteristics of reservoir fluids, determine the type of fluid in the sampling chamber.
For example, in certain instances, the sampling chamber 102 upon sampling will contain about 2 cc's of compressed air, about 400 cc's of a compressed initial fluid at close to reservoir pressure, and about 400 cc of collected sample at reservoir pressure. In certain instances, the initial fluid can be a heat transfer fluid such as Paratherm, a registered trademark of the Paratherm Corporation. For sake of discussion, the reservoir pressure in this example is known to be 5000 psi, and pressure in the pressure source 108 at reservoir temperature is 15,000 psi. The pressure source 108 has been charged with nitrogen. As the nitrogen is released, it will compress the initial fluid and the collected sample from 5000 psi to close to 15,000 psi, and in doing so, the nitrogen pressure in the pressure source 108 will fall commensurate with the increase in nitrogen volume due to compression of initial fluid and collected sample. The numerical value for the compressibility of the initial fluid is known, and consequently the shrinkage of the initial fluid due to the pressure surge, and the corresponding increase in nitrogen volume along with the decrease in nitrogen pressure can be readily calculated.
Accordingly, when the samplers are activated there will be a drop in nitrogen pressure, while the drop in this overall pressure due entirely to the compression of the initial fluid can be readily calculated. Consequently, the remaining measured pressure drop of the nitrogen has to be entirely due to the compression of the collected sample, and this compression of the sample can be used to identify the type of fluid that has been collected by comparison to known characteristics of reservoir fluids. A convenient generic classification of reservoir fluids includes four categories: Black Oils, Volatile Oils including Critical Fluids, Condensates including Wet Gases, and Dry Gas. Each of these hydrocarbon types will have a characteristic compressibility, while collectively they will define a continuum, with the Black Oil systems, which are primarily liquid systems being least compressible, while the condensates and dry gases will be most compressible. Because of this compressibility variation, if a Black Oil sample is collected, then because of its lower compressibility it will result in a higher nitrogen pressure being reported when the nitrogen charge is activated relative to the case where a Condensate or Dry Gas system is collected.
In general each of the hydrocarbon types can be given an average compressibility, and that compressibility can be used to define a corresponding pressure drop. This sample related pressure drop is the only variable so that starting with the overall pressure drop and subtracting the initial fluid related pressure drop, the remaining pressure drop of the nitrogen can be directly related to a particular fluid type.
Consequently, in addition to determining that the sampling chambers 102 have operated, concurrently with the operation of the chambers 102, the operator can determine the reservoir fluid type that represents the collected sample. As above, the analysis can be performed with the fluid sampler 100 in the well, and it need not be tripped out of the well to determine the fluid type.
Therefore, certain aspects encompass an in-well type sampling system. The in-well type sampling system includes a sampling chamber actuable to receive a fluid sample and a pressure source coupled to the sampling chamber to supply pressure to the sampling chamber after actuating the sampling chamber. A pressure sensor is provided in communication with the pressure source to measure the pressure of the pressure source. A telemetry communicator is coupled to the pressure sensor to send a signal from the pressure sensor away from the sampling system.
Certain aspects encompass a method where a sample of reservoir fluids is received into a sample chamber of a sampling system in a well. A pressure from a pressure source of the sampling system is applied to the sample in the sample chamber. A measurement of the pressure in the pressure source, taken after applying pressure to the sample, is communicated to a location away from the sampling system.
Certain aspects encompass a system having an in-well type sampling device including a sampling chamber coupled to a pressure source and a pressure sensor to measure pressure of the pressure source. The system includes a monitor to monitor the pressure sensor and determine a sample has been collected in the sample chamber based on the monitoring of the pressure sensor.
The aspects above can include some, none or all of the following features. A computer can be provided to reside outside of a well to receive communication from the telemetry communicator and determine that the sampling chamber has operated to receive a sample based on the signal from the pressure sensor. In certain instances, the computer can determine the sampling chamber has operated to receive a sample when a change in pressure of the pressure source is greater than a specified change in pressure. The telemetry communicator can be coupled to the pressure sensor to send a signal from the pressure sensor away from the sampling system concurrently as the pressure sensor is measuring the pressure of the pressure source. The computer can determine the type of fluid collected in the sampling chamber based on the signal from the pressure sensor. For example the computer can determine the type of fluid collected in the sampling chamber when a change in pressure of the pressure source is equal to a specified change in pressure. In certain instances, the computer can determine the type of fluid collected in the sampling chamber is one of black oil, volatile oil, condensate, or dry gas. In certain instances, prior to sampling, the sampling chamber comprises initial contents, and the computer can determine the type of fluid collected in the sampling chamber by accounting for the compressibility of the initial contents.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. §371 and claims the benefit of priority to PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/078266, filed on Dec. 30, 2013 and entitled “Well Fluid Sampling Confirmation and Analysis”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/878,243, filed on Sep. 16, 2013 and entitled “Well Fluid Sampling Confirmation and In-Situ Analysis”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/078266 | 12/30/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/038179 | 3/19/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5470377 | Whitlock | Nov 1995 | A |
6216782 | Skinner | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7197923 | Wright et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7395712 | Irani et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7472589 | Irani et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7596995 | Irani et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634946 | Irani et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7762130 | Irani et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7856872 | Irani et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7874206 | Irani et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7926342 | Irani et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946166 | Irani et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7950277 | Irani et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7966876 | Irani et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967067 | Irani et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8146660 | Irani et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8215390 | Irani et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8215391 | Irani et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8429961 | Irani et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8474533 | Miller et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8547556 | Irani | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20080148838 | Irani | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245570 | Partouche | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090049904 | Meister | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20120166089 | Ramshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120222852 | Pelletier | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130025855 | Glattetre et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130199286 | Gao | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Authorized Officer Chan Yoon Hwang, PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2013/078266, dated Jun. 3, 2014, 14 pages. |
Cyrus Irani, “Pre-Filing Activity by Cyrus Irani”, on or before year 2012 but describing , 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160265353 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61878243 | Sep 2013 | US |