Well tool assemblies with quick connectors and shock mitigating capabilities

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8875796
  • Patent Number
    8,875,796
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 21, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 4, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method can include interconnecting a well tool in a well tool assembly with a shock mitigating connection, the interconnecting being performed without threading, and positioning the well tool assembly in a wellbore. A well perforating assembly can include at least two perforating devices, a detonation train extending through the perforating devices, and a shock absorber positioned between the perforating devices. A method of assembling a perforating assembly can include, prior to installing the perforating assembly in a wellbore, pushing one perforating device connector into another perforating device connector without threading the connectors together, thereby: a) preventing disconnection of the connectors and b) making a connection in a detonation train. A well system can include a perforating assembly including multiple perforating guns and multiple shock absorbers. Each shock absorber may be interconnected between at least two of the perforating guns.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with subterranean wells and, in an embodiment described herein, more particularly provides a well tool assembly with quick connectors and shock mitigating capabilities.


Shock absorbers have been used in the past in attempts to prevent damage to well equipment resulting from firing perforating guns and other events. In some situations, a shock absorber is interconnected between a perforating assembly and the well equipment (such as, a packer, gravel packing equipment, instruments, etc.) to be protected from shock loads.


However, testing has revealed that such shock loads are transmitted in a very short amount of time (e.g., ˜10-30 milliseconds), and conventional shock absorbers are either too rigid to react adequately to the shock, or too compliant to absorb the shock. Therefore, it will be appreciated that improvements are needed in the art of mitigating shock for well assemblies.


Improvements are also needed in the art of connecting well tool assemblies. Such improvements could reduce the amount of time needed to connect perforating devices or other well tools, and could prevent damage to connectors used to connect well tools.


SUMMARY

In carrying out the principles of the present disclosure, systems and methods are provided which bring improvements to the art. One example is described below in which multiple shock absorbers are interconnected in a perforating assembly. Another example is described below in which connections are made between well tools without threading.


A method described below can include interconnecting a well tool in a well tool assembly with a shock mitigating connection, the interconnecting being performed without threading, and positioning the well tool assembly in a wellbore. The method may be used for well perforating assemblies, or for other types of well tool assemblies.


In one aspect, a well perforating assembly is disclosed. The perforating assembly can include at least two perforating devices, a detonation train extending through the perforating devices, and a shock absorber positioned between the perforating devices.


In another aspect, a method of assembling a perforating assembly is described below. The method can include, prior to installing the perforating assembly in a wellbore, pushing one perforating device connector into another perforating device connector without threading the connectors together, thereby: a) preventing disconnection of the connectors and b) making a connection in a detonation train.


In yet another aspect, a well system is provided which can include a perforating assembly including multiple perforating guns and multiple shock absorbers. Each shock absorber is interconnected between at least two of the perforating guns.


These and other features, advantages and benefits will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the detailed description of representative embodiments of the disclosure hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings, in which similar elements are indicated in the various figures using the same reference numbers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a representative partially cross-sectional view of a well system and associated method which can embody principles of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged scale representative partially cross-sectional view of a prior art perforating assembly.



FIG. 3 is a representative cross-sectional view of a perforating assembly which can embody principles of this disclosure.



FIG. 4 is a further enlarged scale cross-sectional view of detail 4 in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a still further enlarged scale cross-sectional view of detail 5 in FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is a representative partially cross-sectional view of another configuration of the well system and method.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Representatively illustrated in FIG. 1 is a well system 10 and associated method which can embody principles of the present disclosure. In the system 10, a perforating assembly 12 is positioned in a wellbore 14 for forming perforations 16 through casing 18 lining the wellbore.


The perforating assembly 12 can include any number of perforating devices, such as a firing head 20 and perforating guns 22. The firing head 20 fires the perforating guns 22 in response to a particular stimulus (e.g., pressure levels, pressure pulses, a telemetry signal, a bar dropped through a tubular string to the firing head, etc.). Any type of firing head, and any type of perforating guns, may be used in the perforating assembly 12 in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.


Although only one firing head 20 connected above the perforating guns 22 is depicted in FIG. 1, it will be appreciated that any number or position of firing head(s) may be used, as desired. For example, the firing head 20 could be connected at a lower end of the perforating assembly 12, multiple firing heads could be used, a separate firing head could be used for each perforating gun, etc.


In the system 10, it is desired to prevent unsetting or otherwise damaging a packer 24 set in the casing 18 above the perforating guns 22. The packer 24 is used herein as one example of a type of well equipment which can be protected using the principles of this disclosure, but it should be clearly understood that any other types of well equipment (e.g., anchors, hangers, instruments, other perforating devices, etc.) may be protected in other examples.


In one unique feature of the well system 10, a shock absorbing connection 26 is disposed between each adjacent pair of the perforating guns 22, and a shock absorbing connection is also disposed between the firing head 20 and the uppermost perforating gun. The connections 26 also allow the perforating devices (firing head 20 and perforating guns 22) to be quickly assembled to each other prior to installing the perforating assembly 12 in the wellbore 14.


Although a connection 26 is depicted in FIG. 1 between each adjacent pair of the perforating guns 22, it will be appreciated that the connections could be otherwise positioned. In other examples, some adjacent pairs of perforating guns 22 may not have the connections 26 between them. Thus, it is not necessary for each adjacent pair of perforating guns 22 to have one of the connections 26 between them, nor is it necessary for one of the connections 26 to be positioned between the firing head 20 and the adjacent perforating gun 22.


By interconnecting multiple shock absorbing connections 26 in the perforating assembly 12, each connection only has to absorb shock generated due to firing of the adjacent perforating device(s), and accumulation of the shock loads along the perforating assembly is prevented, or at least beneficially mitigated. Greater or fewer numbers of the connections 26 may be used in the perforating assembly 12 as needed to achieve a desired level of shock mitigation.


Referring additionally now to FIG. 2, a partially cross-sectional view of a prior art perforating assembly 28 is representatively illustrated. The perforating assembly 28 includes the perforating guns 22, with each perforating gun including perforating charges 30, a charge carrier 32 and detonating cord 34 in a generally tubular gun body 36.


However, instead of the shock absorbing connections 26 used in the system 10, the perforating assembly 28 of FIG. 2 includes a rigid, threaded connection 38 between the perforating guns 22. Specifically, a connector 40 having opposing externally-threaded ends is threaded into one perforating gun 22, and another connector 42 having opposing externally- and internally-threaded ends is threaded into another perforating gun 22.


When the connectors 40, 42 are threaded together, the rigid, threaded connection 38 is made. The connection 38 has no shock absorbing capability, and threading the connectors 40, 42 to each other can be difficult when the guns 22 are long and/or heavy, sometimes resulting in damage to threads on the connectors.


The improved connection 26 used in the system 10 is representatively illustrated in FIG. 3. The connection 26 may be used between perforating guns 22, between a perforating gun and the firing head 20, or between any other well tools or equipment. The connection 26 may also be used in perforating assemblies other than the perforating assembly 12, and in well systems other than the well system 10, in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.


The connection 26 includes a connector 44 which is attached to a perforating device (such as a perforating gun or firing head, not shown), and another connector 46 which is depicted in FIG. 3 as being attached to a perforating gun 22. The connectors 44, 46 may each be attached to the respective perforating guns 22, firing head 20 or other perforating devices or other well tools by threading or any other suitable means.


In one unique feature of the connection 26, the connector 44 can be inserted and pushed into the other connector 46 without threading. Once connected in this manner, an engagement device 48 prevents disconnection of the connectors 44, 46.


The engagement device 48 permits the connector 44 to displace in one direction longitudinally toward the other connector 46, but prevents the connector 44 from displacing in the opposite longitudinal direction relative to the connector 46. Thus, the connection 26 can be longitudinally compressed, but the device 48 prevents the connection from being elongated longitudinally.


One benefit of this arrangement is that the perforating devices or other well tools attached to the connectors 44, 46 can be quickly and conveniently connected to each other, without any need for threading the connector 44 into the other connector 46. Another benefit of this arrangement is that detonation transfer components (such as, detonation boosters 56 attached at ends of the detonating cords 34) are brought into close proximity to each other when the connector 44 is pushed into the other connector 46. In this manner, a connection is made in a detonation train 54 (including the detonating cord 34, boosters 56, etc.) which extends through the connection 26.


Another unique feature of the connection 26 is that it includes shock absorbers 50, 52 disposed between the connectors 44, 46. The shock absorbers 50, 52 function to absorb shock loads which would otherwise be transmitted through the connection 26.


The shock absorbers 50, 52 are preferably made of a material which can deform appropriately to absorb the shock loads resulting from firing of the perforating devices. Some acceptable materials for the shock absorbers 50, 52 can include brass, aluminum, rubber, foamed materials, or any other shock absorbing materials.


The shock absorbers 50, 52 may be annular-shaped as depicted in FIG. 3, or they could have any other shapes, such as round, square, T- or I-shaped cross-sections, etc. The size, shape, material and/or other characteristics of the shock absorbers 50, 52 may be customized for their placement in the perforating assembly 12, position in the well, size and length of the adjacent perforating devices or other well tools, etc.


Although two shock absorbers 50, 52 are illustrated in the connection 26 example of FIG. 3, in other examples different numbers of shock absorbers (including one) may be used. In addition, although in FIG. 3 the detonation train 54 is depicted as extending through the shock absorbers 50, 52, such an arrangement is not necessary in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.


Since the connection 26 allows for longitudinal compression of the connectors 44, 46, when a compressive shock load is transmitted to the connection, the connectors will compress somewhat, with the shock absorbers 50, 52 thereby absorbing the compressive shock load. In this manner, transmission of the shock load across the connection 26 is prevented, or is at least significantly mitigated.


Referring additionally now to FIG. 4, an enlarged scale cross-sectional view of the engagement device 48 is representatively illustrated. As depicted in FIG. 4, the engagement device 48 comprises a segmented or longitudinally split sleeve 58 having a series of relatively coarse pitch ramp-type profiles 60 on an exterior thereof, and a series of relatively fine pitch profiles 62 on an interior thereof.


The profiles 60, 62 may be formed as threads on the engagement device 48, with the respective connectors 46, 44 having complementarily shaped profiles formed thereon. For example, the profiles 60 could be formed as 45-degree buttress threads, and the profiles 62 could be formed as a “phonograph” finish (very fine grooves).


However, it should be understood that, preferably, the connectors 44, 46 are not threaded to each other with the engagement device 48. Instead, the connector 44 is preferably pushed into the connector 46 (without rotating or threading either connector), and the engagement device 48 prevents the connector 44 from being withdrawn from the connector 46.


In the example of FIG. 4, this result is accomplished due to the ramped interface between the profiles 60 and the connector 46, and gripping of the connector 44 by the profiles 62. A further enlarged scale view of this engagement between the connectors 44, 46 and the device 48 is representatively illustrated in FIG. 5.


If a tensile load is applied across the connection 26, the profiles 62 will grip the outer surface of the connector 44, so that the sleeve 58 attempts to displace with the connector 44. However, the ramps of the profiles 60, in engagement with the connector 46, prevent downward (as viewed in FIG. 5) displacement of the connector 44 and sleeve 58, and cause the sleeve to be compressed radially inward.


The inward compression of the sleeve 58 causes the profiles 62 to more securely grip the outer surface of the connector 44. The sleeve 58 can be formed with a C-shaped lateral cross-section, so that it can be readily deformed inward. The sleeve 58 can also be deformed radially outward, if desired, so that it no longer grips the outer surface of the connector 44, thereby allowing the connector 44 to be withdrawn from the connector 46, for example, to disassemble the perforating assembly 12 after firing, after a misfire, etc.


Although the connection 26 is described above as having multiple benefits (e.g., speed of connecting, lack of threading connectors 44, 46 to each other, shock absorbing capability, detonation train 54 connecting, etc.), it is not necessary for all of the above-described benefits to be incorporated into a single connection embodying principles of this disclosure. The connection 26 could include one of the above-described benefits, any subset of those benefits, and/or other benefits.


Referring additionally now to FIG. 6, another configuration of the well system 10 is representatively illustrated. In this configuration, the connections 26 are used to prevent or mitigate shock being transmitted to various well tools 64a-c interconnected in a well tool assembly 66 positioned in the wellbore 14.


In this example, the well tool 64a comprises an instrument carrier (containing, for example, one or more pressure and/or temperature sensors, etc.), the well tool 64b comprises a fluid sampler (e.g., with chambers therein for containing selectively filled fluid samples), and the well tool 64c comprises an electronics module (e.g., used for receiving, storing and/or transmitting data, commands, etc., measuring parameters, etc.). However, it should be clearly understood that these are merely examples of well tools which can benefit from the principles of this disclosure, and any type of well tool may be used in the assembly 66 in keeping with those principles.


It is not necessary for the assembly 66 to include multiple well tools. Instead, a single well tool may benefit from use of the connections 26.


It is not necessary for the connections 26 to be used on both ends of each of the well tools 64a-c as depicted in FIG. 6. Instead, a connection 26 may be used on only one end of a well tool, or in positions other than the ends of a well tool.


In the example of FIG. 6, the connections 26 prevent or mitigate shock being transmitted to the well tools 64a-c interconnected in the assembly 66, and also allow the well tools to be interconnected in the assembly quickly and without threading. Note that the firing head 20, perforating guns 22 and packer 24 described above are also examples of well tools which can benefit from use of the connection 26.


It may now be fully appreciated that the above disclosure provides several advancements to the art. The connection 26 depicted in FIGS. 1 & 3-6 allows for shock loads to be absorbed or at least mitigated between perforating devices or other well tools, and allows perforating devices and other well tools to be connected to each other quickly and without threading.


A method described above can include interconnecting a well tool 64a-c in a well tool assembly 66 with a shock mitigating connection 26, the interconnecting being performed without threading, and positioning the well tool assembly 66 in a wellbore 14.


The connection 26 may comprise at least one shock absorber 50, 52 positioned between connectors 44, 46. The connection 26 may comprise a sleeve 58 having relatively coarse pitch profiles 60 on one side, and the sleeve 58 having relatively fine pitch profiles 62 on an opposite side.


Interconnecting can include pushing one connector 44 into another connector 46 without threading the connectors 44, 46 together, thereby preventing disconnection of the connectors 44, 46. An engagement device 48 may permit relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in one longitudinal direction, but prevent relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in an opposite longitudinal direction.


The well tool may be one or more of a perforating gun 22, a firing head 20, a packer 24, an instrument carrier 64a. a fluid sampler 64b and an electronics module 64c.


A well perforating assembly 12 described above can include at least two perforating devices (such as firing head 20, perforating gun 22, etc.), a detonation train 54 extending through the perforating devices 20, 22, and a shock absorber 50, 52 positioned between the perforating devices 20, 22.


The shock absorber 50, 52 preferably absorbs longitudinally directed shock generated by firing at least one of the perforating devices 20, 22.


The detonation train 54 may extend longitudinally through the shock absorber 50, 52.


The perforating devices may comprise perforating guns 22. The perforating devices may comprise a perforating gun 22 and a firing head 20.


The assembly 12 can include a connection 26 between the perforating devices 20, 22. An engagement device 48 of the connection 26 may permit longitudinal compression of the connection 26, but prevent elongation of the connection 26.


The connection 26 can comprise connectors 44, 46 attached to the respective perforating devices. The engagement device 48 may permit relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in one longitudinal direction, but prevent relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in an opposite longitudinal direction.


The connectors 44, 46 are preferably connected to each other without threading together the connectors 44, 46. The detonation train 54 may extend through the connectors 44, 46.


Also described above is a method of assembling a perforating assembly 12. The method can include, prior to installing the perforating assembly 12 in a wellbore 14, pushing one perforating device connector 44 into another perforating device connector 46 without threading the connectors 44, 46 together, thereby: a) preventing disconnection of the connectors 44, 46 and b) making a connection in a detonation train 54.


The method can also include positioning a shock absorber 50, 52 between the connectors 44, 46. The shock absorber 50, 52 may absorb longitudinally directed shock generated by firing at least one perforating device 20, 22. The detonation train 54 may extend longitudinally through the shock absorber 50, 52.


Each, or at least one, of the perforating device connectors 44, 46 may be attached to a perforating gun 22. At least one of the perforating device connectors 44, 46 may be attached to a firing head 20.


The above disclosure also provides to the art a well system 10. The well system 10 can comprise a perforating assembly 12 including multiple perforating guns 22 and multiple shock absorbers 50, 52.


Each shock absorber 50, 52 may be interconnected between at least two of the perforating guns 22. Each shock absorber 50, 52 preferably mitigates transmission of shock from one connector 44 to another 46, the connectors being longitudinally compressible but prevented from elongating. A detonation train 54 may extend through the shock absorbers 50, 52.


It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the present disclosure described herein may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present disclosure. The embodiments are described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the disclosure, which is not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.


In the above description of the representative embodiments of the disclosure, directional terms, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” etc., are used merely for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings.


Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments of the disclosure, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to the specific embodiments, and such changes are contemplated by the principles of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method of interconnecting and securing a well tool in a well tool assembly, comprising: interconnecting and securing the well tool in the well tool assembly with a shock mitigating connection, the shock mitigating connection being made by inserting a first connector into a second connector without relative rotation between the first and second connectors, wherein an engagement device permits relative displacement between the first and second connectors in one longitudinal direction, but prevents relative displacement between the first and second connectors in an opposite longitudinal direction; andthen positioning the well tool assembly in a wellbore.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the connection comprises at least one shock absorber positioned between the first and second connectors.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the engagement device comprises a sleeve having relatively coarse pitch profiles on one side, and the sleeve having relatively fine pitch profiles on an opposite side.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein engagement between the first and second connectors prevents disconnection of the shock mitigating connection.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the interconnecting and securing further comprises making a detonation train connection.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the well tool is selected from a group comprising: a perforating gun, a firing head, a packer, an instrument carrier, a fluid sampler and an electronics module.
  • 7. A well perforating assembly, comprising: at least two perforating devices;a detonation train extending through the perforating devices, the detonation train including a detonation booster; anda shock absorbing connection including a shock absorber, the shock absorbing connection being positioned between the perforating devices, wherein the detonation train extends through the shock absorbing connection, and wherein the detonation booster is disposed within the shock absorbing connection.
  • 8. The assembly of claim 7, wherein the shock absorber absorbs longitudinally directed shock generated by firing at least one of the perforating devices.
  • 9. The assembly of claim 7, wherein the detonation train extends longitudinally through the shock absorbing connection.
  • 10. The assembly of claim 7, wherein the perforating devices comprise perforating guns.
  • 11. The assembly of claim 7, wherein the perforating devices comprise a perforating gun and a firing head.
  • 12. The assembly of claim 7, wherein the shock absorbing connection connects the perforating devices, and wherein an engagement device of the connection permits longitudinal compression of the connection, but prevents elongation of the connection.
  • 13. The assembly of claim 12, wherein the connection comprises connectors attached to the respective perforating devices, and wherein the engagement device permits relative displacement between the connectors in one longitudinal direction, but prevents relative displacement between the connectors in an opposite longitudinal direction.
  • 14. The assembly of claim 13, wherein the connectors are connected to each other by inserting a first connector into a second connector without relative rotation between the first and second connectors.
  • 15. The assembly of claim 13, wherein the detonation train extends through the connectors.
  • 16. A method of assembling a perforating assembly, the method comprising: prior to installing the perforating assembly in a wellbore, pushing a first perforating device connector into a second perforating device connector without relative rotation between the first and second connectors, thereby: a) preventing disconnection of the first connector from the second connector and b) making a connection in a detonation train, wherein an engagement device permits relative displacement between the first and second connectors in one longitudinal direction, but prevents relative displacement between the first and second connectors in an opposite longitudinal direction.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising positioning a shock absorber between the connectors.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the shock absorber absorbs longitudinally directed shock generated by firing at least one perforating device.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the detonation train extends longitudinally through the shock absorber.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, wherein each of the perforating device connectors is attached to a perforating gun.
  • 21. The method of claim 16, wherein at least one of the perforating device connectors is attached to a perforating gun.
  • 22. The method of claim 16, wherein at least one of the perforating device connectors is attached to a firing head.
  • 23. A well system, comprising: a perforating assembly including multiple perforating guns and multiple shock absorbing connections, each shock absorbing connection including a shock absorber, wherein each shock absorbing connection is made by inserting a first connector into a second connector without relative rotation between the first and second connectors, and wherein an engagement device permits relative displacement between the first and second connectors in one longitudinal direction, but prevents relative displacement between the first and second connectors in an opposite longitudinal direction.
  • 24. The well system of claim 23, wherein each shock absorbing connection mitigates transmission of shock, and wherein each shock absorbing connection is longitudinally compressible but prevented from elongating.
  • 25. The well system of claim 23, wherein a detonation train extends through at least one of the shock absorbing connections, wherein the detonation train includes a detonation booster.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/430,550 filed on 26 Mar. 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/413,588 filed on 6 Mar. 2012, which claims priority to International application no. PCT/US2011/029412 filed on 22 disclosures of these prior applications are incorporated herein by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (197)
Number Name Date Kind
2833213 Udry May 1958 A
2980017 Castel Apr 1961 A
3054450 Baker Sep 1962 A
3057296 Silverman Oct 1962 A
3128825 Blagg Apr 1964 A
3143321 McGehee et al. Aug 1964 A
3208378 Boop Sep 1965 A
3216751 Der Mott Nov 1965 A
3394612 Bogosoff et al. Jul 1968 A
3414071 Alberts Dec 1968 A
3653468 Marshall Apr 1972 A
3687074 Andrews et al. Aug 1972 A
3779591 Rands Dec 1973 A
3923105 Lands, Jr. Dec 1975 A
3923106 Bosse-Platiere Dec 1975 A
3923107 Dillard Dec 1975 A
3971926 Gau et al. Jul 1976 A
4269063 Escaron et al. May 1981 A
4319526 DerMott Mar 1982 A
4346795 Herbert Aug 1982 A
4409824 Slama et al. Oct 1983 A
4410051 Daniel et al. Oct 1983 A
4419933 Kirby et al. Dec 1983 A
4480690 Vann Nov 1984 A
4575026 Brittain et al. Mar 1986 A
4598776 Stout Jul 1986 A
4612992 Vann et al. Sep 1986 A
4619333 George Oct 1986 A
4637478 George Jan 1987 A
4679669 Kalb et al. Jul 1987 A
4693317 Edwards et al. Sep 1987 A
4694878 Gambertoglio Sep 1987 A
4764231 Slawinski et al. Aug 1988 A
4817710 Edwards et al. Apr 1989 A
4830120 Stout May 1989 A
4842059 Tomek Jun 1989 A
4901802 George et al. Feb 1990 A
4913053 McPhee Apr 1990 A
4971153 Rowe et al. Nov 1990 A
5027708 Gonzalez et al. Jul 1991 A
5044437 Wittrisch Sep 1991 A
5078210 George Jan 1992 A
5088557 Ricles et al. Feb 1992 A
5092167 Finley et al. Mar 1992 A
5103912 Flint Apr 1992 A
5107927 Whiteley et al. Apr 1992 A
5109355 Yuno Apr 1992 A
5117911 Navarette et al. Jun 1992 A
5131470 Miszewski et al. Jul 1992 A
5133419 Barrington Jul 1992 A
5161616 Colla Nov 1992 A
5188191 Tomek Feb 1993 A
5216197 Huber et al. Jun 1993 A
5287924 Burleson et al. Feb 1994 A
5343963 Bouldin et al. Sep 1994 A
5351791 Rosenzweig Oct 1994 A
5366013 Edwards et al. Nov 1994 A
5421780 Vukovic Jun 1995 A
5529127 Burleson et al. Jun 1996 A
5547148 Del Monte et al. Aug 1996 A
5598894 Burleson et al. Feb 1997 A
5603379 Henke et al. Feb 1997 A
5662166 Shammai Sep 1997 A
5667023 Harrell et al. Sep 1997 A
5774420 Heysse et al. Jun 1998 A
5813480 Zaleski, Jr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5823266 Burleson et al. Oct 1998 A
5826654 Adnan et al. Oct 1998 A
5957209 Burleson et al. Sep 1999 A
5964294 Edwards et al. Oct 1999 A
5992523 Burleson et al. Nov 1999 A
6012015 Tubel Jan 2000 A
6021377 Dubinsky et al. Feb 2000 A
6068394 Dublin, Jr. May 2000 A
6078867 Plumb et al. Jun 2000 A
6098716 Hromas et al. Aug 2000 A
6109335 Jolivet et al. Aug 2000 A
6109355 Reid Aug 2000 A
6135252 Knotts Oct 2000 A
6173779 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6216533 Woloson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6230101 Wallis May 2001 B1
6283214 Guinot et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308809 Reid et al. Oct 2001 B1
6371541 Pedersen Apr 2002 B1
6394241 Desjardins et al. May 2002 B1
6397752 Yang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408953 Goldman et al. Jun 2002 B1
6412415 Kothari et al. Jul 2002 B1
6412614 Lagrange et al. Jul 2002 B1
6450022 Brewer Sep 2002 B1
6454012 Reid Sep 2002 B1
6457570 Reid et al. Oct 2002 B2
6484801 Brewer et al. Nov 2002 B2
6543538 Tolman et al. Apr 2003 B2
6550322 Sweetland et al. Apr 2003 B2
6595290 George et al. Jul 2003 B2
6672405 Tolman et al. Jan 2004 B2
6674432 Kennon et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679323 Vargervik et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679327 Sloan et al. Jan 2004 B2
6684949 Gabler et al. Feb 2004 B1
6684954 George Feb 2004 B2
6708761 George et al. Mar 2004 B2
6810370 Watts, III Oct 2004 B1
6826483 Anderson Nov 2004 B1
6832159 Smits et al. Dec 2004 B2
6842725 Sarda Jan 2005 B1
6868920 Hoteit et al. Mar 2005 B2
7000699 Yang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006959 Huh et al. Feb 2006 B1
7044219 Mason et al. May 2006 B2
7114564 Parrott et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121340 Grove et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139689 Huang Nov 2006 B2
7147088 Reid et al. Dec 2006 B2
7165612 McLaughlin Jan 2007 B2
7178608 Mayes et al. Feb 2007 B2
7195066 Sukup et al. Mar 2007 B2
7234517 Streich et al. Jun 2007 B2
7246659 Fripp et al. Jul 2007 B2
7260508 Lim et al. Aug 2007 B2
7278480 Longfield et al. Oct 2007 B2
7387160 O'Shaughnessy et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387162 Mooney, Jr. et al. Jun 2008 B2
7503403 Jogi et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509245 Siebrits et al. Mar 2009 B2
7533722 George et al. May 2009 B2
7600568 Ross et al. Oct 2009 B2
7603264 Zamora et al. Oct 2009 B2
7640986 Behrmann et al. Jan 2010 B2
7721650 Barton et al. May 2010 B2
7721820 Hill et al. May 2010 B2
7762331 Goodman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770662 Harvey et al. Aug 2010 B2
7806035 Kaiser et al. Oct 2010 B2
8126646 Grove et al. Feb 2012 B2
8136608 Goodman Mar 2012 B2
8397800 Rodgers et al. Mar 2013 B2
8397814 Rodgers et al. Mar 2013 B2
8408286 Rodgers et al. Apr 2013 B2
20020121134 Sweetland et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030062169 Marshall Apr 2003 A1
20030089497 George et al. May 2003 A1
20030150646 Brooks et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040045351 Skinner Mar 2004 A1
20040104029 Martin Jun 2004 A1
20040140090 Mason et al. Jul 2004 A1
20060048940 Hromas et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070734 Zillinger et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060118297 Finci et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060243453 McKee Nov 2006 A1
20070101808 Irani et al. May 2007 A1
20070162235 Zhan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070193740 Quint Aug 2007 A1
20070214990 Barkley et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080041597 Fisher et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080149338 Goodman et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080202325 Bertoja et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080216554 McKee Sep 2008 A1
20080245255 Barton et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262810 Moran et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080314582 Belani et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013775 Bogath et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090071645 Kenison et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084535 Bertoja et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090151589 Henderson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090168606 Lerche et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182541 Crick et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090223400 Hill et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241658 Irani et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090272529 Crawford Nov 2009 A1
20090276156 Kragas et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294122 Hansen et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000789 Barton et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011943 Quinn et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100037793 Lee et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100051265 Hurst et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100085210 Bonavides et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100132939 Rodgers Jun 2010 A1
20100133004 Burleson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100147519 Goodman Jun 2010 A1
20100230105 Vaynshteyn Sep 2010 A1
20120085539 Tonnessen et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120152519 Rodgers et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120152542 Le Jun 2012 A1
20120152614 Rodgers et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120152615 Rodgers et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120152616 Rodgers et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158388 Rodgers et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120181026 Le et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120241169 Hales et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120241170 Hales et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120247769 Schacherer et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120318508 Glenn et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130048375 Rodgers et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130048376 Rodgers et al. Feb 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2065557 Jun 2009 EP
2406870 Apr 2005 GB
2004076813 Sep 2004 WO
2004099564 Nov 2004 WO
2007056121 May 2007 WO
2013032456 Mar 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (114)
Entry
Office Action issued Nov. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,909, 43 pages.
Office Action issued Dec. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,035, 19 pages.
Office Action issued Dec. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,600, 48 pages.
Australian Examination Report issued Jan. 3, 2013 for AU Patent Application No. 2010365400, 3 pages.
Office Action issued Jan. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 44 pages.
Office Action issued Jan. 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 55 pages.
Office Action issued Feb. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,077, 31 pages.
Office Action issued Jan. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 32 pages.
Office Action issued Jun. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 21 pages.
Office Action issued Mar. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 14 pages.
Office Action issued Mar. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 17 pages.
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Housing and High Shock Considerations”, informational presentation, received Sep. 1, 2010, 18 pages.
IES, Scott A. Ager; Analog Recorder Test Example, informational letter, dated Sep. 1, 2010, 1 page.
IES, Scott A. Ager; “Series 300 Gauge”, product information, dated Sep. 1, 2010, 1 page.
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Introduction”, Company introduction presentation, received Sep. 1, 2010, 23 pages.
Petroleum Experts; “IPM: Engineering Software Development”, product brochure, dated 2008, 27 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Oct. 27, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/034690, 9 pages.
Kappa Engineering; “Petroleum Exploration and Product Software, Training and Consulting”, product informational paper on v4.12B, dated Jan. 2010, 48 pages.
Qiankun Jin, Zheng Shigui, Gary Ding, Yianjun, Cui Binggui, Beijing Engeneering Software Technology Co. Ltd.; “3D Numerical Simulations of Penetration of Oil-Well Perforator into Concrete Targets”, Paper for the 7th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, received Jan. 28, 2010, 6 pages.
Mario Dobrilovic, Zvonimir Ester, Trpimir Kujundzic; “Measurements of Shock Wave Force in Shock Tube with Indirect Methods”, Original scientific paper vol. 17, str. 55-60, dated 2005, 6 pages.
IES, Scott A. Ager; “Model 64 and 74 Buildup”, product presentation, dated Oct. 17, 2006,57 pages.
A. Blakeborough et al.; “Novel Load Cell for Measuring Axial Forca, Shear Force, and Bending Movement in large-scale Structural Experiments”, Informational paper, dated Mar. 23-Aug. 30, 2001, 8 pages.
Weibing Li et al.; “The Effect of Annular Multi-Point Initiation on the Formation and Penetration of an Explosively Formed Penetrator”, Article in the International Journal of Impact Engineering, dated Aug. 27, 2009, 11 pages.
Sergio Murilo et al.; “Optimization and Automation of Modeling of Flow Perforated Oil Wells”, Presentation for the Product Development Conference, dated 2004, 31 pages.
Frederic Bruyere et al.; “New Practices to Enhance Perforating Results”, Oilfield Review, dated Autumn 2006, 18 pages.
John F. Schatz; “Pert Breakdown, Fracturing, and Cleanup in PulsFrac”, informational brochure, dated May 2, 2007, 6 pages.
M. A. Proett et al.; “Productivity Optimization of Oil Wells Using a New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model and Artificial Neutral Network”, conference paper, dated 2004, 17 pages.
John F. Schatz; “PulsFrac Summary Technical Description”, informational brochure, dated 2003, 8 pages.
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Recorder Buildup”, Company presentation, received Sep. 1, 2010, 59 pages.
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Sensor Discussion”, received Sep. 1, 2010, 38 pages.
IES; “ Series 300: High Shock, High Speed Pressure Gauge”, product brochure, dated Feb. 1, 2012, 2 pages.
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, filed Mar. 6, 2012, 30 pages.
Scott A. Ager; “IES Fast Speed Gauges”, informational presentation, dated Mar. 2, 2009, 38 pages.
IES; “Battery Packing for High Shock”, article AN102, received Sep. 1, 2010, 4 pages.
IES; “Accelerometer Wire Termination”, article AN106, received Sep. 1, 2010, 4 pages.
John F. Schatz; “PulsFrac Validation: Owen/HTH Surface Block Test”, product information, dated 2004, 4 pages.
Offshore Technology Conference; “Predicting Pressure Behavior and Dynamic Shock Loads on Completion Hardware During Perforating”, OTC 21059, dated May 3-6, 2010, 11 pages.
IES; “Series 200: High Shock, High Speed Pressure and Acceleration Gauge”, product brochure, received Feb. 11, 2010, 2 pages.
Terje Rudshaug, et al.; “A toolbox for improved Reservoir Management”, NETool, Force AWTC Seminar, Apr. 21-22, 2004, 29 pages.
Halliburton; “ShockPro Schockload Evaluation Service”, Perforating Solutions pp. 5-125 to 5-126, dated 2007, 2 pages.
Halliburton; “ShockPro Schockload Evaluation Service”, H03888, dated Jul. 2007, 2 pages.
Strain Gages; “Positioning Strain Gages to Monitor Bending, Axial, Shear, and Torsional Loads”, p. E-5 to E-6, dated 2012, 2 pages.
B. Grove, et al.; “Explosion-Induced Damage to Oilwell Perforating Gun Carriers”, Structures Under Shock and Impact IX, vol. 87, ISSN 1743-3509, SU060171, dated 2006, 12 pages.
WEM; “Well Evaluation Model”, product brochure, received Mar. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
ENDEVCO; “Problems in High-Shock Measurement”, MEGGITT brochure TP308, dated Jul. 2007, 9 pages.
John F. Schatz; “Casing Differential in PulsFrac Calculations”, product information, dated 2004, 2 pages.
John F. Schatz; “The Role of Compressibility in PulsFrac Software”, informational paper, dated Aug. 22, 2007, 2 pages.
“2010 International Perforating Symposium”, Agenda, dated May 6-7, 2010, 2 pages.
ESSCA Group; “Erin Dynamic Flow Analysis Platform”, online article, dated 2009, 1 page.
Halliburton; “Fast Gauge Recorder”, article 5-110, received Nov. 16, 2010, 2 pages.
Kenji Furui; “A Comprehensive Skin Factor Model for Well Completions Based on Finite Element Simulations”, informational paper, dated May 2004, 182 pages.
Halliburton; “Simulation Software for EquiFlow ICD Completions”, H07010, dated Sep. 2009, 2 pages.
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/377,148, filed Dec. 8, 2011, 47 pages.
Office Action issued Sep. 8, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 10 pages.
Office Action issued Feb. 2, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 8 pages.
Office Action issued Jul. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 6 pages.
Office Action issued Nov. 22, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 6 pages.
Office Action issued May 4, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 9 pages.
Office Action issued Apr. 21, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/008,075, 9 pages.
J.A. Regalbuto et al; “Computer Codes for Oilwell-Perforator Design”, SPE 30182, dated Sep. 1997, 8 pages.
J.F. Schatz et al; “High-Speed Downhole Memory Recorder and Software Used to Design and Confirm Perforating/Propellant Behavior and Formation Fracturing”, SPE 56434, dated Oct. 3-6, 1999, 9 pages.
Joseph Ansah et al; “Advances in Well Completion Design: A New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model for Optimizing Performance of Perforated Completions”, SPE 73760, Feb. 20-21, 2002, 11 pages.
D.A. Cuthill et al; “A New Technique for Rapid Estimation of Fracture Closure Stress When Using Propellants”, SPE 78171, dated Oct. 20-23, 2002, 6 pages.
J.F. Schatz et al; “High-Speed Pressure and Accelerometer Measurements Characterize Dynamic Behavior During Perforating Events in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico”, SPE 90042, dated Sep. 26-29, 2004, 15 pages.
Liang-Biao Ouyang et al; “Case Studies for Improving Completion Design Through Comprehensive Well-Performance Modeling”, SPE 104078, dated Dec. 5-7, 2006, 11 pages.
Liang-Biao Ouyang et al; “Uncertainty Assessment on Well-Performance Prediction for an Oil Producer Equipped With Selected Completions”, SPE 106966, dated Mar. 31-Apr. 3, 2007, 9 pages.
B. Grove et al; “new Effective Stress Law for Predicting Perforation Depth at Downhole Conditions”, SPE 111778, dated Feb. 13-15, 2008, 10 pages.
Office Action issued Jul. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 22 pages.
Office Action issued Jul. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 17 pages.
Khulief, YA et al.; “Vibration of Drillstrings With Self-Excited Stick-Slip”, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, pp. 540-558, vol. 299, received Jun. 24, 2013, 2 pages.
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, filed Nov. 23, 2011, 32 pages.
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,853, filed Dec. 8, 2011, 40 pages.
Halliburton; “AutoLatch Release Gun Connector”, Special Applications 6-7, received Jan. 19, 2011, 1 page.
Halliburton; “Body Lock Ring”, Mechanical Downhole: Technology Transfer, dated Oct. 10, 2001, 4 pages.
Office Action issued Jun. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/377,148, 38 pages.
Carlos Baumann, Harvey Williams, and Schlumberger; “Perforating Wellbore Dynamics and Gunshock in Deepwater TCP Operations”, Product informational presentation, IPS-10-018, received May 11, 2011, 28 pages.
Schlumberger; “SXVA Explosively Initiated Vertical Shock Absorber”, product paper 06-WT-066, dated 2007, 1 page.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Dec. 27, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/046955, 8 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US10/61104, 8 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Nov. 22, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US11/029412, 9 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US10/061107, 9 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Oct. 27, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US11/034690, 9 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Nov. 30, 2011 for PCT/US11/036686, 10 pages.
Office Action issued Sep. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,035, 28 pages.
Mexican Office Action issued Sep. 2, 2013 for MX Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/011468, 3 pages.
English Translation of Mexican Office Action issued Sep. 2, 2013 for MX Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/011468, 2 pages.
Office Action issued Sep. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 25 pages.
Office Action issued Nov. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, 104 pages.
Advisory Action issued Nov. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 3 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Mar. 22, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/029412, 9 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Sep. 2, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/050395, 9 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Aug. 31, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/049882, 9 pages.
Office Action issued Feb. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, 15 pages.
Office Action issued Apr. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,726, 26 pages.
Office Action issued Jul. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 42 pages.
Office Action issued Jul. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,726, 52 pages.
Office Action issued Aug. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 35 pages.
Australian Office Action issued Sep. 21, 2012 for AU Patent Application No. 2010365400, 3 pages.
Office Action issued Oct. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,866, 35 pages.
Office Action issued Oct. 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,726, 20 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Feb. 9, 2012 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/050401, 8 pages.
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US10/61102, 8 pages.
Office Action issued Jun. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,909, 35 pages.
Special Devices, Inc.; “Electronic Initiation System: The SDI Electronic Initiation System”, online product brochure from www.specialdevices.com, received May 18, 2011, 4 pages.
Joseph E. Shepherd; “Structural Response of Piping to Internal Gas Detonation”, article PVP2006-ICPVT11-93670, proceedings of PVP2006-ICPVT-11, dated 2006, 18 pages.
Office Action issued Dec. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,327, 75 pages.
Office Action issued Apr. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 29 pages.
Office Action issued Jun. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,327, 23 pages.
Office Action issued Jun. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,600, 38 pages.
Patent Application and Drawings, filed Dec. 17, 2010, serial No. PCT/US10/61104, 38 pages.
Y.A. Khulief, et al.; “Vibration analysis of drillstrings with self-excited stick-slip oscillations”, Journal of Sound and Vibration 299 (2007) 540-558, dated Oct. 2, 2006, 19 pages.
Office Action issued Jun. 29, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,866, 30 pages.
Office Action issued Jul. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 23 pages.
Office Action issued Mar. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, 17 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130213668 A1 Aug 2013 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13430550 Mar 2012 US
Child 13848632 US
Parent 13413588 Mar 2012 US
Child 13430550 US