The present disclosure relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with subterranean wells and, in an embodiment described herein, more particularly provides a well tool assembly with quick connectors and shock mitigating capabilities.
Shock absorbers have been used in the past in attempts to prevent damage to well equipment resulting from firing perforating guns and other events. In some situations, a shock absorber is interconnected between a perforating assembly and the well equipment (such as, a packer, gravel packing equipment, instruments, etc.) to be protected from shock loads.
However, testing has revealed that such shock loads are transmitted in a very short amount of time (e.g., ˜10-30 milliseconds), and conventional shock absorbers are either too rigid to react adequately to the shock, or too compliant to absorb the shock. Therefore, it will be appreciated that improvements are needed in the art of mitigating shock for well assemblies.
Improvements are also needed in the art of connecting well tool assemblies. Such improvements could reduce the amount of time needed to connect perforating devices or other well tools, and could prevent damage to connectors used to connect well tools.
In carrying out the principles of the present disclosure, systems and methods are provided which bring improvements to the art. One example is described below in which multiple shock absorbers are interconnected in a perforating assembly. Another example is described below in which connections are made between well tools without threading.
A method described below can include interconnecting a well tool in a well tool assembly with a shock mitigating connection, the interconnecting being performed without threading, and positioning the well tool assembly in a wellbore. The method may be used for well perforating assemblies, or for other types of well tool assemblies.
In one aspect, a well perforating assembly is disclosed. The perforating assembly can include at least two perforating devices, a detonation train extending through the perforating devices, and a shock absorber positioned between the perforating devices.
In another aspect, a method of assembling a perforating assembly is described below. The method can include, prior to installing the perforating assembly in a wellbore, pushing one perforating device connector into another perforating device connector without threading the connectors together, thereby: a) preventing disconnection of the connectors and b) making a connection in a detonation train.
In yet another aspect, a well system is provided which can include a perforating assembly including multiple perforating guns and multiple shock absorbers. Each shock absorber is interconnected between at least two of the perforating guns.
These and other features, advantages and benefits will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the detailed description of representative embodiments of the disclosure hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings, in which similar elements are indicated in the various figures using the same reference numbers.
Representatively illustrated in
The perforating assembly 12 can include any number of perforating devices, such as a firing head 20 and perforating guns 22. The firing head 20 fires the perforating guns 22 in response to a particular stimulus (e.g., pressure levels, pressure pulses, a telemetry signal, a bar dropped through a tubular string to the firing head, etc.). Any type of firing head, and any type of perforating guns, may be used in the perforating assembly 12 in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.
Although only one firing head 20 connected above the perforating guns 22 is depicted in
In the system 10, it is desired to prevent unsetting or otherwise damaging a packer 24 set in the casing 18 above the perforating guns 22. The packer 24 is used herein as one example of a type of well equipment which can be protected using the principles of this disclosure, but it should be clearly understood that any other types of well equipment (e.g., anchors, hangers, instruments, other perforating devices, etc.) may be protected in other examples.
In one unique feature of the well system 10, a shock absorbing connection 26 is disposed between each adjacent pair of the perforating guns 22, and a shock absorbing connection is also disposed between the firing head 20 and the uppermost perforating gun. The connections 26 also allow the perforating devices (firing head 20 and perforating guns 22) to be quickly assembled to each other prior to installing the perforating assembly 12 in the wellbore 14.
Although a connection 26 is depicted in
By interconnecting multiple shock absorbing connections 26 in the perforating assembly 12, each connection only has to absorb shock generated due to firing of the adjacent perforating device(s), and accumulation of the shock loads along the perforating assembly is prevented, or at least beneficially mitigated. Greater or fewer numbers of the connections 26 may be used in the perforating assembly 12 as needed to achieve a desired level of shock mitigation.
Referring additionally now to
However, instead of the shock absorbing connections 26 used in the system 10, the perforating assembly 28 of
When the connectors 40, 42 are threaded together, the rigid, threaded connection 38 is made. The connection 38 has no shock absorbing capability, and threading the connectors 40, 42 to each other can be difficult when the guns 22 are long and/or heavy, sometimes resulting in damage to threads on the connectors.
The improved connection 26 used in the system 10 is representatively illustrated in
The connection 26 includes a connector 44 which is attached to a perforating device (such as a perforating gun or firing head, not shown), and another connector 46 which is depicted in
In one unique feature of the connection 26, the connector 44 can be inserted and pushed into the other connector 46 without threading. Once connected in this manner, an engagement device 48 prevents disconnection of the connectors 44, 46.
The engagement device 48 permits the connector 44 to displace in one direction longitudinally toward the other connector 46, but prevents the connector 44 from displacing in the opposite longitudinal direction relative to the connector 46. Thus, the connection 26 can be longitudinally compressed, but the device 48 prevents the connection from being elongated longitudinally.
One benefit of this arrangement is that the perforating devices or other well tools attached to the connectors 44, 46 can be quickly and conveniently connected to each other, without any need for threading the connector 44 into the other connector 46. Another benefit of this arrangement is that detonation transfer components (such as, detonation boosters 56 attached at ends of the detonating cords 34) are brought into close proximity to each other when the connector 44 is pushed into the other connector 46. In this manner, a connection is made in a detonation train 54 (including the detonating cord 34, boosters 56, etc.) which extends through the connection 26.
Another unique feature of the connection 26 is that it includes shock absorbers 50, 52 disposed between the connectors 44, 46. The shock absorbers 50, 52 function to absorb shock loads which would otherwise be transmitted through the connection 26.
The shock absorbers 50, 52 are preferably made of a material which can deform appropriately to absorb the shock loads resulting from firing of the perforating devices. Some acceptable materials for the shock absorbers 50, 52 can include brass, aluminum, rubber, foamed materials, or any other shock absorbing materials.
The shock absorbers 50, 52 may be annular-shaped as depicted in
Although two shock absorbers 50, 52 are illustrated in the connection 26 example of
Since the connection 26 allows for longitudinal compression of the connectors 44, 46, when a compressive shock load is transmitted to the connection, the connectors will compress somewhat, with the shock absorbers 50, 52 thereby absorbing the compressive shock load. In this manner, transmission of the shock load across the connection 26 is prevented, or is at least significantly mitigated.
Referring additionally now to
The profiles 60, 62 may be formed as threads on the engagement device 48, with the respective connectors 46, 44 having complementarily shaped profiles formed thereon. For example, the profiles 60 could be formed as 45-degree buttress threads, and the profiles 62 could be formed as a “phonograph” finish (very fine grooves).
However, it should be understood that, preferably, the connectors 44, 46 are not threaded to each other with the engagement device 48. Instead, the connector 44 is preferably pushed into the connector 46 (without rotating or threading either connector), and the engagement device 48 prevents the connector 44 from being withdrawn from the connector 46.
In the example of
If a tensile load is applied across the connection 26, the profiles 62 will grip the outer surface of the connector 44, so that the sleeve 58 attempts to displace with the connector 44. However, the ramps of the profiles 60, in engagement with the connector 46, prevent downward (as viewed in
The inward compression of the sleeve 58 causes the profiles 62 to more securely grip the outer surface of the connector 44. The sleeve 58 can be formed with a C-shaped lateral cross-section, so that it can be readily deformed inward. The sleeve 58 can also be deformed radially outward, if desired, so that it no longer grips the outer surface of the connector 44, thereby allowing the connector 44 to be withdrawn from the connector 46, for example, to disassemble the perforating assembly 12 after firing, after a misfire, etc.
Although the connection 26 is described above as having multiple benefits (e.g., speed of connecting, lack of threading connectors 44, 46 to each other, shock absorbing capability, detonation train 54 connecting, etc.), it is not necessary for all of the above-described benefits to be incorporated into a single connection embodying principles of this disclosure. The connection 26 could include one of the above-described benefits, any subset of those benefits, and/or other benefits.
Referring additionally now to
In this example, the well tool 64a comprises an instrument carrier (containing, for example, one or more pressure and/or temperature sensors, etc.), the well tool 64b comprises a fluid sampler (e.g., with chambers therein for containing selectively filled fluid samples), and the well tool 64c comprises an electronics module (e.g., used for receiving, storing and/or transmitting data, commands, etc., measuring parameters, etc.). However, it should be clearly understood that these are merely examples of well tools which can benefit from the principles of this disclosure, and any type of well tool may be used in the assembly 66 in keeping with those principles.
It is not necessary for the assembly 66 to include multiple well tools. Instead, a single well tool may benefit from use of the connections 26.
It is not necessary for the connections 26 to be used on both ends of each of the well tools 64a-c as depicted in
In the example of
It may now be fully appreciated that the above disclosure provides several advancements to the art. The connection 26 depicted in FIGS. 1 & 3-6 allows for shock loads to be absorbed or at least mitigated between perforating devices or other well tools, and allows perforating devices and other well tools to be connected to each other quickly and without threading.
A method described above can include interconnecting a well tool 64a-c in a well tool assembly 66 with a shock mitigating connection 26, the interconnecting being performed without threading, and positioning the well tool assembly 66 in a wellbore 14.
The connection 26 may comprise at least one shock absorber 50, 52 positioned between connectors 44, 46. The connection 26 may comprise a sleeve 58 having relatively coarse pitch profiles 60 on one side, and the sleeve 58 having relatively fine pitch profiles 62 on an opposite side.
Interconnecting can include pushing one connector 44 into another connector 46 without threading the connectors 44, 46 together, thereby preventing disconnection of the connectors 44, 46. An engagement device 48 may permit relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in one longitudinal direction, but prevent relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in an opposite longitudinal direction.
The well tool may be one or more of a perforating gun 22, a firing head 20, a packer 24, an instrument carrier 64a. a fluid sampler 64b and an electronics module 64c.
A well perforating assembly 12 described above can include at least two perforating devices (such as firing head 20, perforating gun 22, etc.), a detonation train 54 extending through the perforating devices 20, 22, and a shock absorber 50, 52 positioned between the perforating devices 20, 22.
The shock absorber 50, 52 preferably absorbs longitudinally directed shock generated by firing at least one of the perforating devices 20, 22.
The detonation train 54 may extend longitudinally through the shock absorber 50, 52.
The perforating devices may comprise perforating guns 22. The perforating devices may comprise a perforating gun 22 and a firing head 20.
The assembly 12 can include a connection 26 between the perforating devices 20, 22. An engagement device 48 of the connection 26 may permit longitudinal compression of the connection 26, but prevent elongation of the connection 26.
The connection 26 can comprise connectors 44, 46 attached to the respective perforating devices. The engagement device 48 may permit relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in one longitudinal direction, but prevent relative displacement between the connectors 44, 46 in an opposite longitudinal direction.
The connectors 44, 46 are preferably connected to each other without threading together the connectors 44, 46. The detonation train 54 may extend through the connectors 44, 46.
Also described above is a method of assembling a perforating assembly 12. The method can include, prior to installing the perforating assembly 12 in a wellbore 14, pushing one perforating device connector 44 into another perforating device connector 46 without threading the connectors 44, 46 together, thereby: a) preventing disconnection of the connectors 44, 46 and b) making a connection in a detonation train 54.
The method can also include positioning a shock absorber 50, 52 between the connectors 44, 46. The shock absorber 50, 52 may absorb longitudinally directed shock generated by firing at least one perforating device 20, 22. The detonation train 54 may extend longitudinally through the shock absorber 50, 52.
Each, or at least one, of the perforating device connectors 44, 46 may be attached to a perforating gun 22. At least one of the perforating device connectors 44, 46 may be attached to a firing head 20.
The above disclosure also provides to the art a well system 10. The well system 10 can comprise a perforating assembly 12 including multiple perforating guns 22 and multiple shock absorbers 50, 52.
Each shock absorber 50, 52 may be interconnected between at least two of the perforating guns 22. Each shock absorber 50, 52 preferably mitigates transmission of shock from one connector 44 to another 46, the connectors being longitudinally compressible but prevented from elongating. A detonation train 54 may extend through the shock absorbers 50, 52.
It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the present disclosure described herein may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present disclosure. The embodiments are described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the disclosure, which is not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.
In the above description of the representative embodiments of the disclosure, directional terms, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” etc., are used merely for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings.
Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments of the disclosure, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to the specific embodiments, and such changes are contemplated by the principles of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/430,550 filed on 26 Mar. 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/413,588 filed on 6 Mar. 2012, which claims priority to International application no. PCT/US2011/029412 filed on 22 disclosures of these prior applications are incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2833213 | Udry | May 1958 | A |
2980017 | Castel | Apr 1961 | A |
3054450 | Baker | Sep 1962 | A |
3057296 | Silverman | Oct 1962 | A |
3128825 | Blagg | Apr 1964 | A |
3143321 | McGehee et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3208378 | Boop | Sep 1965 | A |
3216751 | Der Mott | Nov 1965 | A |
3394612 | Bogosoff et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3414071 | Alberts | Dec 1968 | A |
3653468 | Marshall | Apr 1972 | A |
3687074 | Andrews et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3779591 | Rands | Dec 1973 | A |
3923105 | Lands, Jr. | Dec 1975 | A |
3923106 | Bosse-Platiere | Dec 1975 | A |
3923107 | Dillard | Dec 1975 | A |
3971926 | Gau et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4269063 | Escaron et al. | May 1981 | A |
4319526 | DerMott | Mar 1982 | A |
4346795 | Herbert | Aug 1982 | A |
4409824 | Slama et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4410051 | Daniel et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4419933 | Kirby et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4480690 | Vann | Nov 1984 | A |
4575026 | Brittain et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4598776 | Stout | Jul 1986 | A |
4612992 | Vann et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619333 | George | Oct 1986 | A |
4637478 | George | Jan 1987 | A |
4679669 | Kalb et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4693317 | Edwards et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4694878 | Gambertoglio | Sep 1987 | A |
4764231 | Slawinski et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4817710 | Edwards et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4830120 | Stout | May 1989 | A |
4842059 | Tomek | Jun 1989 | A |
4901802 | George et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4913053 | McPhee | Apr 1990 | A |
4971153 | Rowe et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5027708 | Gonzalez et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044437 | Wittrisch | Sep 1991 | A |
5078210 | George | Jan 1992 | A |
5088557 | Ricles et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092167 | Finley et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103912 | Flint | Apr 1992 | A |
5107927 | Whiteley et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109355 | Yuno | Apr 1992 | A |
5117911 | Navarette et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5131470 | Miszewski et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133419 | Barrington | Jul 1992 | A |
5161616 | Colla | Nov 1992 | A |
5188191 | Tomek | Feb 1993 | A |
5216197 | Huber et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5287924 | Burleson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5343963 | Bouldin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351791 | Rosenzweig | Oct 1994 | A |
5366013 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5421780 | Vukovic | Jun 1995 | A |
5529127 | Burleson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5547148 | Del Monte et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5598894 | Burleson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603379 | Henke et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5662166 | Shammai | Sep 1997 | A |
5667023 | Harrell et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5774420 | Heysse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813480 | Zaleski, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823266 | Burleson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826654 | Adnan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5957209 | Burleson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964294 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992523 | Burleson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012015 | Tubel | Jan 2000 | A |
6021377 | Dubinsky et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6068394 | Dublin, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6078867 | Plumb et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098716 | Hromas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109335 | Jolivet et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109355 | Reid | Aug 2000 | A |
6135252 | Knotts | Oct 2000 | A |
6173779 | Smith | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216533 | Woloson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230101 | Wallis | May 2001 | B1 |
6283214 | Guinot et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308809 | Reid et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6371541 | Pedersen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394241 | Desjardins et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397752 | Yang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408953 | Goldman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412415 | Kothari et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6412614 | Lagrange et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450022 | Brewer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454012 | Reid | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457570 | Reid et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6484801 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6543538 | Tolman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550322 | Sweetland et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6595290 | George et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6672405 | Tolman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6674432 | Kennon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679323 | Vargervik et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679327 | Sloan et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684949 | Gabler et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6684954 | George | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708761 | George et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6810370 | Watts, III | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826483 | Anderson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832159 | Smits et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842725 | Sarda | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6868920 | Hoteit et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7000699 | Yang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006959 | Huh et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7044219 | Mason et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7114564 | Parrott et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121340 | Grove et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139689 | Huang | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147088 | Reid et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165612 | McLaughlin | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178608 | Mayes et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195066 | Sukup et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7234517 | Streich et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246659 | Fripp et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260508 | Lim et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7278480 | Longfield et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7387160 | O'Shaughnessy et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387162 | Mooney, Jr. et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7503403 | Jogi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509245 | Siebrits et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7533722 | George et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7600568 | Ross et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7603264 | Zamora et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7640986 | Behrmann et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7721650 | Barton et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7721820 | Hill et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7762331 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770662 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806035 | Kaiser et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8126646 | Grove et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8136608 | Goodman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8397800 | Rodgers et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397814 | Rodgers et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408286 | Rodgers et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020121134 | Sweetland et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030062169 | Marshall | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089497 | George et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030150646 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040045351 | Skinner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040104029 | Martin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040140090 | Mason et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060048940 | Hromas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070734 | Zillinger et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060118297 | Finci et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060243453 | McKee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070101808 | Irani et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162235 | Zhan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070193740 | Quint | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214990 | Barkley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080041597 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080149338 | Goodman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080202325 | Bertoja et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216554 | McKee | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245255 | Barton et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262810 | Moran et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080314582 | Belani et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013775 | Bogath et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090071645 | Kenison et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084535 | Bertoja et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151589 | Henderson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168606 | Lerche et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182541 | Crick et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090223400 | Hill et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241658 | Irani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272529 | Crawford | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276156 | Kragas et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294122 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000789 | Barton et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011943 | Quinn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037793 | Lee et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051265 | Hurst et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085210 | Bonavides et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132939 | Rodgers | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100133004 | Burleson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147519 | Goodman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100230105 | Vaynshteyn | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120085539 | Tonnessen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120152519 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152542 | Le | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152614 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152615 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152616 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158388 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120181026 | Le et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120241169 | Hales et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120241170 | Hales et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120247769 | Schacherer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120318508 | Glenn et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130048375 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130048376 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2065557 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2406870 | Apr 2005 | GB |
2004076813 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004099564 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2007056121 | May 2007 | WO |
2013032456 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued Nov. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,909, 43 pages. |
Office Action issued Dec. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,035, 19 pages. |
Office Action issued Dec. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,600, 48 pages. |
Australian Examination Report issued Jan. 3, 2013 for AU Patent Application No. 2010365400, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 44 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 55 pages. |
Office Action issued Feb. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,077, 31 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 32 pages. |
Office Action issued Jun. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 21 pages. |
Office Action issued Mar. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 14 pages. |
Office Action issued Mar. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 17 pages. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Housing and High Shock Considerations”, informational presentation, received Sep. 1, 2010, 18 pages. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; Analog Recorder Test Example, informational letter, dated Sep. 1, 2010, 1 page. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; “Series 300 Gauge”, product information, dated Sep. 1, 2010, 1 page. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Introduction”, Company introduction presentation, received Sep. 1, 2010, 23 pages. |
Petroleum Experts; “IPM: Engineering Software Development”, product brochure, dated 2008, 27 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Oct. 27, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/034690, 9 pages. |
Kappa Engineering; “Petroleum Exploration and Product Software, Training and Consulting”, product informational paper on v4.12B, dated Jan. 2010, 48 pages. |
Qiankun Jin, Zheng Shigui, Gary Ding, Yianjun, Cui Binggui, Beijing Engeneering Software Technology Co. Ltd.; “3D Numerical Simulations of Penetration of Oil-Well Perforator into Concrete Targets”, Paper for the 7th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, received Jan. 28, 2010, 6 pages. |
Mario Dobrilovic, Zvonimir Ester, Trpimir Kujundzic; “Measurements of Shock Wave Force in Shock Tube with Indirect Methods”, Original scientific paper vol. 17, str. 55-60, dated 2005, 6 pages. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; “Model 64 and 74 Buildup”, product presentation, dated Oct. 17, 2006,57 pages. |
A. Blakeborough et al.; “Novel Load Cell for Measuring Axial Forca, Shear Force, and Bending Movement in large-scale Structural Experiments”, Informational paper, dated Mar. 23-Aug. 30, 2001, 8 pages. |
Weibing Li et al.; “The Effect of Annular Multi-Point Initiation on the Formation and Penetration of an Explosively Formed Penetrator”, Article in the International Journal of Impact Engineering, dated Aug. 27, 2009, 11 pages. |
Sergio Murilo et al.; “Optimization and Automation of Modeling of Flow Perforated Oil Wells”, Presentation for the Product Development Conference, dated 2004, 31 pages. |
Frederic Bruyere et al.; “New Practices to Enhance Perforating Results”, Oilfield Review, dated Autumn 2006, 18 pages. |
John F. Schatz; “Pert Breakdown, Fracturing, and Cleanup in PulsFrac”, informational brochure, dated May 2, 2007, 6 pages. |
M. A. Proett et al.; “Productivity Optimization of Oil Wells Using a New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model and Artificial Neutral Network”, conference paper, dated 2004, 17 pages. |
John F. Schatz; “PulsFrac Summary Technical Description”, informational brochure, dated 2003, 8 pages. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Recorder Buildup”, Company presentation, received Sep. 1, 2010, 59 pages. |
IES, Scott A. Ager; “IES Sensor Discussion”, received Sep. 1, 2010, 38 pages. |
IES; “ Series 300: High Shock, High Speed Pressure Gauge”, product brochure, dated Feb. 1, 2012, 2 pages. |
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, filed Mar. 6, 2012, 30 pages. |
Scott A. Ager; “IES Fast Speed Gauges”, informational presentation, dated Mar. 2, 2009, 38 pages. |
IES; “Battery Packing for High Shock”, article AN102, received Sep. 1, 2010, 4 pages. |
IES; “Accelerometer Wire Termination”, article AN106, received Sep. 1, 2010, 4 pages. |
John F. Schatz; “PulsFrac Validation: Owen/HTH Surface Block Test”, product information, dated 2004, 4 pages. |
Offshore Technology Conference; “Predicting Pressure Behavior and Dynamic Shock Loads on Completion Hardware During Perforating”, OTC 21059, dated May 3-6, 2010, 11 pages. |
IES; “Series 200: High Shock, High Speed Pressure and Acceleration Gauge”, product brochure, received Feb. 11, 2010, 2 pages. |
Terje Rudshaug, et al.; “A toolbox for improved Reservoir Management”, NETool, Force AWTC Seminar, Apr. 21-22, 2004, 29 pages. |
Halliburton; “ShockPro Schockload Evaluation Service”, Perforating Solutions pp. 5-125 to 5-126, dated 2007, 2 pages. |
Halliburton; “ShockPro Schockload Evaluation Service”, H03888, dated Jul. 2007, 2 pages. |
Strain Gages; “Positioning Strain Gages to Monitor Bending, Axial, Shear, and Torsional Loads”, p. E-5 to E-6, dated 2012, 2 pages. |
B. Grove, et al.; “Explosion-Induced Damage to Oilwell Perforating Gun Carriers”, Structures Under Shock and Impact IX, vol. 87, ISSN 1743-3509, SU060171, dated 2006, 12 pages. |
WEM; “Well Evaluation Model”, product brochure, received Mar. 2, 2010, 2 pages. |
ENDEVCO; “Problems in High-Shock Measurement”, MEGGITT brochure TP308, dated Jul. 2007, 9 pages. |
John F. Schatz; “Casing Differential in PulsFrac Calculations”, product information, dated 2004, 2 pages. |
John F. Schatz; “The Role of Compressibility in PulsFrac Software”, informational paper, dated Aug. 22, 2007, 2 pages. |
“2010 International Perforating Symposium”, Agenda, dated May 6-7, 2010, 2 pages. |
ESSCA Group; “Erin Dynamic Flow Analysis Platform”, online article, dated 2009, 1 page. |
Halliburton; “Fast Gauge Recorder”, article 5-110, received Nov. 16, 2010, 2 pages. |
Kenji Furui; “A Comprehensive Skin Factor Model for Well Completions Based on Finite Element Simulations”, informational paper, dated May 2004, 182 pages. |
Halliburton; “Simulation Software for EquiFlow ICD Completions”, H07010, dated Sep. 2009, 2 pages. |
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/377,148, filed Dec. 8, 2011, 47 pages. |
Office Action issued Sep. 8, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 10 pages. |
Office Action issued Feb. 2, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 6 pages. |
Office Action issued Nov. 22, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 6 pages. |
Office Action issued May 4, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,541, 9 pages. |
Office Action issued Apr. 21, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/008,075, 9 pages. |
J.A. Regalbuto et al; “Computer Codes for Oilwell-Perforator Design”, SPE 30182, dated Sep. 1997, 8 pages. |
J.F. Schatz et al; “High-Speed Downhole Memory Recorder and Software Used to Design and Confirm Perforating/Propellant Behavior and Formation Fracturing”, SPE 56434, dated Oct. 3-6, 1999, 9 pages. |
Joseph Ansah et al; “Advances in Well Completion Design: A New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model for Optimizing Performance of Perforated Completions”, SPE 73760, Feb. 20-21, 2002, 11 pages. |
D.A. Cuthill et al; “A New Technique for Rapid Estimation of Fracture Closure Stress When Using Propellants”, SPE 78171, dated Oct. 20-23, 2002, 6 pages. |
J.F. Schatz et al; “High-Speed Pressure and Accelerometer Measurements Characterize Dynamic Behavior During Perforating Events in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico”, SPE 90042, dated Sep. 26-29, 2004, 15 pages. |
Liang-Biao Ouyang et al; “Case Studies for Improving Completion Design Through Comprehensive Well-Performance Modeling”, SPE 104078, dated Dec. 5-7, 2006, 11 pages. |
Liang-Biao Ouyang et al; “Uncertainty Assessment on Well-Performance Prediction for an Oil Producer Equipped With Selected Completions”, SPE 106966, dated Mar. 31-Apr. 3, 2007, 9 pages. |
B. Grove et al; “new Effective Stress Law for Predicting Perforation Depth at Downhole Conditions”, SPE 111778, dated Feb. 13-15, 2008, 10 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,550, 22 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 17 pages. |
Khulief, YA et al.; “Vibration of Drillstrings With Self-Excited Stick-Slip”, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, pp. 540-558, vol. 299, received Jun. 24, 2013, 2 pages. |
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, filed Nov. 23, 2011, 32 pages. |
Specification and drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,853, filed Dec. 8, 2011, 40 pages. |
Halliburton; “AutoLatch Release Gun Connector”, Special Applications 6-7, received Jan. 19, 2011, 1 page. |
Halliburton; “Body Lock Ring”, Mechanical Downhole: Technology Transfer, dated Oct. 10, 2001, 4 pages. |
Office Action issued Jun. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/377,148, 38 pages. |
Carlos Baumann, Harvey Williams, and Schlumberger; “Perforating Wellbore Dynamics and Gunshock in Deepwater TCP Operations”, Product informational presentation, IPS-10-018, received May 11, 2011, 28 pages. |
Schlumberger; “SXVA Explosively Initiated Vertical Shock Absorber”, product paper 06-WT-066, dated 2007, 1 page. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Dec. 27, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/046955, 8 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US10/61104, 8 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Nov. 22, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US11/029412, 9 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US10/061107, 9 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Oct. 27, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US11/034690, 9 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Nov. 30, 2011 for PCT/US11/036686, 10 pages. |
Office Action issued Sep. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,035, 28 pages. |
Mexican Office Action issued Sep. 2, 2013 for MX Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/011468, 3 pages. |
English Translation of Mexican Office Action issued Sep. 2, 2013 for MX Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/011468, 2 pages. |
Office Action issued Sep. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 25 pages. |
Office Action issued Nov. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, 104 pages. |
Advisory Action issued Nov. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 3 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Mar. 22, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/029412, 9 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Sep. 2, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/050395, 9 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Aug. 31, 2011 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/049882, 9 pages. |
Office Action issued Feb. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, 15 pages. |
Office Action issued Apr. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,726, 26 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,588, 42 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,726, 52 pages. |
Office Action issued Aug. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 35 pages. |
Australian Office Action issued Sep. 21, 2012 for AU Patent Application No. 2010365400, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued Oct. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,866, 35 pages. |
Office Action issued Oct. 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,726, 20 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Feb. 9, 2012 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/050401, 8 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US10/61102, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued Jun. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,909, 35 pages. |
Special Devices, Inc.; “Electronic Initiation System: The SDI Electronic Initiation System”, online product brochure from www.specialdevices.com, received May 18, 2011, 4 pages. |
Joseph E. Shepherd; “Structural Response of Piping to Internal Gas Detonation”, article PVP2006-ICPVT11-93670, proceedings of PVP2006-ICPVT-11, dated 2006, 18 pages. |
Office Action issued Dec. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,327, 75 pages. |
Office Action issued Apr. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 29 pages. |
Office Action issued Jun. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/493,327, 23 pages. |
Office Action issued Jun. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,600, 38 pages. |
Patent Application and Drawings, filed Dec. 17, 2010, serial No. PCT/US10/61104, 38 pages. |
Y.A. Khulief, et al.; “Vibration analysis of drillstrings with self-excited stick-slip oscillations”, Journal of Sound and Vibration 299 (2007) 540-558, dated Oct. 2, 2006, 19 pages. |
Office Action issued Jun. 29, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/325,866, 30 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,303, 23 pages. |
Office Action issued Mar. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/304,075, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130213668 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13430550 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13848632 | US | |
Parent | 13413588 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13430550 | US |