Patent Grant
6883605
The field of this invention relates to devices and methods for removing wellbore debris to the surface.
The drilling/completion process typically leaves drilling fluid and/or debris in the wellbore that needs to be cleaned up in order to improve well completion performance and to avoid damage to equipment subsequently delivered into the wellbore. This debris includes drilling fluids, cement sheaths/chunks or metallic shavings from milling or squeezing operations.
The debris can also damage the formation as well as the hardware in the wellbore. In deviated wellbores the solids loosened up by scrapers or brushes could tend to lie on the bottom if sufficient fluid velocities are not developed in the removal process.
In the past, the removal operation involved the use of brushes or scrapers that are run to bottom. Thereafter, the well is put into circulation and the debris is directed to the annular space around the string that delivered the brush or scraping tool to the well bottom. Other, techniques involve the same procedure but also add filters and magnets in an effort to collect the debris in the cleaning tool as it is being churned up. In some cases, the technique above is enhanced with pulling the tools off bottom after circulating and then circulating again, followed by returning the tools to bottom and circulating, yet again. Other techniques combine the addition of chemicals to assist in loosening up the debris. The problem with the circulation technique is that the surface equipment would rarely have the capacity to maintain turbulent flow in the surrounding annulus. As a result, the circulation technique allowed most all of the debris to settle back down in the wellbore rather than being brought to the surface with the circulating fluid.
In the past, as illustrated in several patents, there have been a variety of tools and techniques used to remove debris. U.S. Pat. No. 2,782,860 shows the use of reverse circulation into a pickup tube held by a packer inside a tubular. Several devices involve pulling vacuum on the tubular to suck fluid and debris into it. Some examples are U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,775,805; 4,630,691; 5,269,384; 5,318,128; 3,958,651 and 5,033,545 (fluid jet creates a vacuum). U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,850 uses a seal and crossover to force fluid with debris into the annulus around the tubular string for the trip to the surface. Other techniques involve reverse flow into the tubing string, such as: U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,348 and 5,069,286. Also of interest are U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,562,159 and 5,718,289.
The present invention addresses this shortcoming in the prior art by allowing the use of reverse circulation or simple fluid displacement into the tubing to maintain high fluid velocities for solids removal to the surface. Connection and release from tubing as it is being run into and out of the wellbore has been made easy with the development of tools illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,390,190 and 6,415,862. These tools, designed principally for running in tubulars, such as casing, into a wellbore and keeping them filled or allowing circulation through the casing string to get it unstuck, now are adapted to assist in the new wellbore cleanout process. The tools described in these patents are adapted to sealingly engage the tubing supporting an inverted cup seal or/and cleaning equipment so that the loosened debris could be forced to the surface as the cup seal or/and cleaning equipment are advanced downhole. Displacement and/or reverse circulation can be used to drive fluid laden with cuttings up the tubing to the surface. At the surface, the returning cuttings and debris-laden stream can be directed to separation equipment and back to the mud pits. In a further refinement, ports can be used just downhole from a cup seal that is mounted above the cleaning equipment. Displaced or reverse circulating fluid could enter the ports directly above the cleaning equipment and below the cup seal for the return trip through the tubing to the surface. These and other advantages of the present invention can be more readily appreciated by those skilled in the art from a review of the details of the preferred embodiment described below and from the claims.
A wellbore cleanup tool and method are described. In one embodiment, the fluid is displaced with a cup seal into the tubing/drill pipe as the seal is lowered into the wellbore. In another embodiment reverse circulation directs debris into the tubing/drill pipe as it is loosened on the trip into the hole. The returning fluid laden with debris can be directed to either below the cleaning equipment or above it when used with a cup seal and a return port adjacent to it.
Referring to
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that with surface equipment that makes connecting and releasing from the work string 12 an easy matter as it is being run in, an improved well debris removal technique of the present invention can be implemented. In its various forms, it can use a cup seal such as 10 with or without ports to do the dislodging and collection of loosened debris. Alternatively, scraping equipment, involving a number of different combinations of known devices such as brushes 24 or scrapers 26 or other equipment can be used to return the debris to the surface. The cup seal 10 can be mounted on a sleeve to allow the tubular string 12 to rotate items such as brushes 24 or scrapers 26 while the seal 10 remains stationary. Tubular string 12 could be rigid tubing or coiled tubing. Here again ports such as 32 can be used or omitted and the collection of debris can proceed with only fluid displacement when moving seal 10 or in combination with reverse circulation. Seal 10 can be a downwardly oriented cup seal or it can have other forms. It need not form a perfect seal as long as it is capable of displacing enough fluid when advanced to allow debris collection in the manner described. In that sense it can be a ring that occludes the annular space and is not a seal at all. In addition it is understood that completion fluid can be placed in the annulus above seal 10 as the apparatus is being inserted into the well thereby reducing the time required to reverse the mud from the well to displace the mud system with completion fluid.
The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof, and various changes in the size, shape and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated construction, may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2073126 | Sweet | Mar 1937 | A |
| 2191702 | Yowell | Feb 1940 | A |
| 2362198 | Gibson | Nov 1944 | A |
| 2433828 | Cassell | Jan 1948 | A |
| 2464669 | Brown | Mar 1949 | A |
| 2512801 | Kinney et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
| 2782860 | Tausch et al. | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2829717 | Brown | Apr 1958 | A |
| 2959224 | Ault | Nov 1960 | A |
| 3500933 | Burba, Jr et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3760878 | Peevey | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3775805 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3958651 | Young | May 1976 | A |
| 4474240 | Oliver, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4630691 | Hooper | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4671355 | Strange | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4892145 | Stafford | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4921046 | Caskey | May 1990 | A |
| 4944348 | Whiteley et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5030291 | Titmas | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5033545 | Sudol | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5069286 | Roensch et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5269384 | Cherrington | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5318128 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5402850 | Lalande et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5419397 | Reynolds et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5562159 | Smith et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570742 | Reynolds et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5718289 | Schnatzmeyer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 6347667 | Howlett et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6371207 | Reynolds | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6390190 | Mullins | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6415862 | Mullins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040099413 A1 | May 2004 | US |
