Wellbore density meter using a rotor and diffuser

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11591899
  • Patent Number
    11,591,899
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 5, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 28, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
This disclosure relates to an electric submersible pump assembly to measure a density of a fluid in a wellbore. The ESP assembly includes a density meter having a diffuser with an interior volume defined by an inner surface, a rotatable rotor arranged in the interior volume, a measurement channel, and a sensor sub-assembly configured to measure pressures in the measurement channel. The rotor includes a rotor channel defined by a first face of a partition of the rotor and an interior wall of the rotor, extends from an inlet to an outlet. The inlet is arranged at a first radial distance from an axis and the outlet is arranged at a second radial distance from the axis, greater than the first radial distance. The measurement channel, defined by the inner surface of the diffuser and a second face of the partition, extends from the outlet to the inlet.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to measuring properties of fluids flowing through a wellbore.


BACKGROUND

In hydrocarbon production, a producing well can produce both hydrocarbons and water. Knowing the ratio of water to hydrocarbons is important for determining a quantity of hydrocarbons a well produces, as well as running flow assurance calculations. Two types of measurement tools used to determine a downhole water content of a production flow are based on technology found in a gamma ray densitometer and a gradiomanometer. The gamma ray tool is based on the principle that the absorbance of gamma rays is inversely proportional to the density of the medium through which the gamma rays pass. Such a tool include a gamma ray source, a channel through which the fluid medium can flow through, and a gamma ray detector. The gradiomanometer is a device used to determine average fluid density by measuring the pressure difference between two pressure sensors. The pressure sensors are typically spaced (axially) about 0.6 m (2 feet) from each other.


In some instances, an electric submersible pump can be installed within a completed well to increase production rates.


SUMMARY

This disclosure describes technologies relating to measuring fluid density in a fluid flow, for example, a fluid flow through a well bore.


In certain aspects, an electric submersible pump (ESP) assembly measures a density of a fluid in a wellbore. The ESP assembly includes a fluid entrance, and a density meter rotationally connected to a motor via the shaft and fluidly connected to the fluid entrance. The density meter has a diffuser with an interior volume defined by an inner surface, and has a rotor arranged in the interior volume of the diffuser rotationally coupled to the motor via the shaft. The rotor includes an interior wall, a partition having a first face and a second face opposite the first face, and a rotor channel defined by the first face of the partition of the rotor and the interior wall of the rotor. The rotor channel extends from an inlet to an outlet. The inlet is fluidly connected to the fluid entrance of the ESP assembly and is arranged at a first radial distance from the axis. The outlet is arranged at a second radial distance from the axis, and the first radial distance of the inlet is less than the second radial distance of the outlet. The density meter also includes a sensor sub-assembly and a measurement channel defined by the inner surface of the diffuser and the second face of the partition of the rotor. The measurement channel extends from the outlet of the rotor channel to the inlet of the rotor channel. The sensor sub-assembly is arranged on the inner surface of the diffuser and is configured to measure at least two pressures in the measurement channel.


In some cases, the measurement channel is configured to flow fluid from the rotor channel.


Some measurement channels are arranged adjacent to the rotor channel. In some cases, the sensor sub-assembly includes a first pressure sensor arranged in the measurement channel at a first radial distance from the axis. The sensor sub-assembly can also include a second pressure sensor arranged in the measurement channel at a second radial distance from the axis. The first radial distance of the first pressure sensor is greater than the second radial distance of the second pressure sensor. The first radial distance of the first pressure sensor may be known and/or the second radial distance of the second pressure sensor may be known.


Some ESP assemblies further include one or more processors; and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operation. The operations can include prompting the motor to rotate the rotor of the ESP assembly about the axis such that the fluid at the outlet of the rotor channel of the rotor is at a higher fluid pressure than the inlet of the rotor channel. The inlet of the rotor channel is arranged radially closer to the axis than the outlet of the rotor channel. The operations also include prompting a first pressure sensor disposed in a measurement channel defined between the rotor and a diffuser to read or measure a first pressure signal and prompting a second pressure sensor disposed in the measurement channel to read or measure a second pressure signal, wherein the second pressure sensor is arranged downstream of the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor is arranged radially closer to the axis than the first pressure sensor.


In some embodiments, the operations further includes determining the density of the fluid in the measurement channel based on the first pressure signal and the second pressure signal.


Some ESP assemblies further include a pump configured to convey fluid in a first direction from the inlet on the rotor channel to the outlet of the rotor channel. In some cases, the fluid flowing in the measurement channel flows in a second direction, opposite the first direction.


The first radial distance of the inlet of the rotor channel and/or the second radial distance of the outlet of the rotor channel may be known.


Some diffuser channels are defined by the inner surface if the diffuser is fluidly connected to the outlet of the rotor channel and the fluid entrance of the ESP assembly. In some cases, the diffuser channel is arranged downstream of the rotor channel.


In some cases, the rotor is rotatable relative to the diffuser.


In some cases, the fluid is an oil-water mixture.


In some embodiments, a total volume of the measurement channel is less than the total volume of the rotor channel. The total volume of the measurement channel can be about 1% to about 20% of the total volume of the rotor channel.


In some cases, the ESP assembly further includes a pump configured to convey the fluid from the first end of the ESP assembly to the second end of the ESP assembly, wherein the pump is arranged upstream of the density meter.


In some ESP assemblies, the density meter forms an intake portion of the pump.


In certain aspects, a method to determine the density of a fluid flowing in an electric submersible pump assembly, includes rotating a shaft, by a motor, at a predetermined angular velocity such that a rotor of the ESP, rotationally coupled to the shaft, rotates about an axis relative to a diffuser of the ESP assembly. The rotor defines a rotor channel. The method further includes sensing, by a first pressure sensor, a first pressure indicative of the pressure at a first location in a measurement channel. The first location is at a first radial distance from the axis. The method also includes sensing, by a second pressure sensor, a second pressure indicative of the pressure at a second location in a measurement channel. The second location is at a second radial distance from the axis. The first radial distance is larger than the second radial distance.


Some methods also include determining the density of the fluid based on the first and second pressures, the first radial distance, the second radial distance, and a predetermined angular velocity of the shaft.


In some cases, the density is determined using the equation:






ρ
=



2


(


p
1

-

p
2


)





k
_

2




Ω
2

(


d
1
2

-

d
2
2


)



.





In some embodiments, the method also includes determining a water cut of the fluid. The water cut can be determined based on the determined density of the fluid, a predetermined density of water, and a predetermined density of oil. The water-cut can be determined using the equation:






WC
=



ρ
-

ρ
o




ρ
w

-

ρ
o



.





In some methods, the fluid is an oil-water mixture.


The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-section view of an electric submersible pump (ESP) assembly arranged in a wellbore.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are cross-sectional views of a density meter of the ESP assembly.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method to determine the density of a fluid flowing in an ESP assembly.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an electric submersible pump assembly arranged in a wellbore.



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an electric submersible pump assembly arranged in a wellbore.



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an electric submersible pump assembly arranged in a wellbore.





Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Production of oil-water mixtures is very common in oilfield operations. One of the physical properties of the fluid mixture required by production engineers, reservoir engineers, or the field operators is the water-cut of the produced fluid downhole. Water-cut is the ratio of water volume flow rate to the oil-water (mixture) volume flow rate. To determine the production water-cut, accurate knowledge of the downhole oil-water mixture density is useful.


This disclosure describes an apparatus and method for measuring the density of oil-water mixtures and determining an oil-to-water ratio during production operations either downhole or topside. The disclosed ESP assembly includes a density meter with a main (first) channel and a measurement channel. The first channel is arranged in a rotatable rotor and has an inlet and an outlet through which fluid flows uphole from the inlet to the outlet. The channel is shaped so that, when the rotor rotates, the fluid at the outlet experiences a higher pressure than the fluid at the inlet, specifically due to centrifugal forces. The measurement channel fluidly connects to the first channel at the inlet and the outlet. Due to the high pressure at the outlet of the channel, a small portion of fluid leaks from the channel into the measurement channel. The fluid in the measurement channel moves from the outlet of the channel to the inlet of the channel due to the pressure difference between the inlet of the channel and the outlet of the channel. A first pressure sensor and a second pressure sensor are arranged at known locations in the measurement channel. The difference between the pressures measured by the pressure sensors can be used to calculate the density of the fluid flowing in the measurement channel, and therefore, the density of the fluid flowing in the ESP assembly.


This compressed configuration of the measurement channel does not increase the length of the ESP assembly, thereby reducing the risk of bending and reducing installation time. Further, the density meter can be used in any well orientation and can be used at the surface to determine a density of a fluid. In addition, the density measurement is not restricted by or tied to the flow rate of the fluid. The disclosed density meter is compact and, during operation, does not constitute a health, safety, security, or environmental concern.



FIG. 1 is a cross-section view of an electric submersible pump assembly 100 arranged in a wellbore 102. The ESP assembly 100 measures a density of a fluid 110, e.g., an oil and water mixture, from the wellbore 102 that enters the ESP assembly 100. The ESP assembly 100 has a first (downhole) end 104 and a second (uphole) end 106. The downhole end 104 is closer to a bottom of the well, whereas the uphole end is closer to the surface. A pump 108 conveys fluid 110 from the downhole end 104 to the uphole end 106 of the ESP assembly 100. The fluid 110 enters the ESP assembly at a fluid entrance 112 of the ESP assembly and flows from the fluid entrance 112, to the surface via the production tubing 114. The fluid entrance 112 and the production tubing 114 are connected by channels (not shown) in a density meter 116 and the pump 108. In some ESP assemblies, the density meter 116 is integrally formed with the pump 108, for example, forming an intake portion of the pump. The ESP assembly further includes a shaft 118 (FIG. 2A) on which the density meter 116 is mounted. The shaft (not shown) is rotationally connected to a motor 120 operable to rotate the shaft about an axis 119. A monitoring sub-system 122 of the ESP assembly is mounted on the motor 120. A protector 124 of the ESP assembly 100 is mounted to the shaft. In such a configuration, the shaft axially connects the motor 120, the protector 124, the density meter 116, and the pump 108. A housing (not shown) axially connects the ESP sub assembly. The monitoring sub-system 122 includes a processor 125 electrically connected to the motor 120. In some cases, the processor controls the motor. In some cases, the motor is controlled by a driver.


The monitoring sub-system 122 contains sensors that measure pump intake, intake pressures, discharge pressures, motor oil, winding temperature, and winding vibrations. The data sensed by the sensors of the monitoring subsystem can be transmitted to the surface via a power cable and/or via the processor 125. The processor 125 can sort, compile, compute, and analyze the sensed data prior to transmitting the data to the surface. In other systems, the sensed data may be sent to the surface, where it is sorted, complied, computed, and analyzed. Some processors can control the motor. In some systems, the motor is controlled by a variable frequency driver at the surface.


The pump 108, density meter 116, motor 120, protector 124 and monitoring sub-system 122 are axially attached to each other and are each positionally maintained by an exterior housing. The fluid 110 enters the wellbore 102 from a formation 128 via a perforation 130 in a wellbore casing 132. A packer 134, attached to the production tubing 114 fluidic ally isolates the wellbore so that the fluid 110 from the formation enters the fluid entrance 112. The fluid 110 then moves from the fluid entrance 112 to the density meter 116, arranged upstream of the pump 108 so that the pump 108 provides a primary suction force, pulling the fluid 110 uphole from the fluid entrance 112 to the density meter 116. The density meter 116 measures a pressure differential in a measurement channel (not shown), to determine a density of the fluid 110.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are cross-sectional views of a density meter 116 of the ESP assembly 100. The density meter is fluidly connected to the fluid entrance so that fluid 110 entering the ESP assembly 100 flows through a first channel 136 of the density meter 116. The density meter 116 includes a diffuser 138 having an interior volume 140 defined by an inner surface 142 and a diffuser channel 143 fluidically connected to the first channel 136 and the pump 108. The diffuser 138 of the density meter 116 is rotationally decoupled from the motor 120 and from the shaft 118. The density meter 116 also includes a rotor 144 arranged in the interior volume 140 of the diffuser 138 and rotationally coupled to the motor 120 via a shaft 118.


The rotor 144 includes an interior wall 146 and a partition 148 have a first face 148a and a second face 148b, opposite the first face 148a. The partition may be a plate or baffle. The size and dimensions of the plate or baffle may increase as the rotor size increases. The rotor 144 defines the first channel 136 by the first face 148a of the partition 148 of the rotor 144 and the interior wall 146 of the rotor 144. The first face 148a is curved so that the first channel 136 extends radially outward from the axis 119. The second face 148b can be curves or can include steps. The first channel 136 extends from an inlet 150 to an outlet 152. The inlet 150 is fluidly connected to the fluid entrance 112 of the ESP assembly 100 and is arranged at a known first radial distance dinlet from the axis 119. The outlet 152 is arranged at a known second radial distance doutlet from the axis 119 and fluidically connects to the diffuser channel 143. The first radial distance dinlet of the inlet 150 is less than the second radial distance doutlet of the outlet 152.


The interior wall 146 of the rotor 144 attaches to the shaft 118 so that the rotor 144, including the partition 148 and the interior wall 146 rotate at the same revolutions per minute (RPM) or angular velocity (Ω) as the shaft 118. The angular velocity (or RPM) of the rotor 144 is therefore known as the motor 120 can be programed or prompted to rotate at a predetermined angular velocity or RPM.


In this configuration, when the rotor 144 is rotating under the force of the motor 120, the fluid 110 flowing in the first channel pressurizes. Due to the outlet 152 being arranged farther from the axis 119 than the inlet 150, the centrifugal forces on the fluid 110 at the outlet 152 are larger than the centrifugal forces on the fluid 110 at the inlet 150. Therefore, when the rotor 144 is rotating, the fluid at the outlet 152 is at a higher pressure than the fluid at the inlet 150. This centrifugal force also contributes to the suction force of the pump 108 to move the fluid from the inlet 150 to the outlet 152. Despite pressure difference of the outlet and the inlet (downhole), the pump 108 and rotor 144 provide sufficient conveyance force to move the fluid 110 through the first channel 136 in a first direction, (uphole) towards the surface.


The density meter 116 further includes a measurement channel 154 on which a sensor sub-assembly 156 is mounted. The measurement channel 154 is defined by the inner surface 142 of the diffuser 138 and a second face 148b of the partition 148 of the rotor 144. The measurement channel 154 extends from the outlet 152 of the first channel 136 to the inlet 150 of the first channel 136. The sensor sub-assembly 156 is electronically and/or electrically connected to the monitoring sub-system 122, for example, the processor 125. The sensor sub-assembly 156 of the density meter 116 includes a first pressure sensor 156a and a second pressure sensor 156b. The first pressure sensor 156a is arranged in the measurement channel 154 at known first radial distance dp1 from the axis 119 and the second pressure sensor 156b is arranged in the measurement channel 154 at a known second radial distance dp2 from the axis 119. The first radial distance dp1 of the first pressure sensor 156a is greater than the second radial distance dp2 of the second pressure sensor 156b. The first pressure sensor is configured to transmit first pressure signals to the monitoring sub-system 122 and/or processor 125 indicative of the pressure measured at the first radial distance dp1. The second pressure sensor is configured to transmit second pressure signals to the monitoring sub-system 122 and/or processor 125 indicative of the pressure measured at the second radial distance dp2.


While the pump 108 conveys the fluid from the inlet 150 of the first channel 136 to the outlet 152 of the first channel, the pressure differences between the inlet 150 and the outlet 152 cause a small portion of the fluid 110 to leak or enter into the measurement channel 154 at the outlet 152 of the first channel 136 and flow in a second direction from the outlet 152 (high pressure) to the inlet 150 (low pressure). At the inlet 150, the leaked or diverted fluid can re-enter the fluid 110 flowing in the first channel 136. In some cases the second direction is opposite the first direction. In some cases, the average directional vector of the first channel is opposite the average directional vector of the measurement channel. A total volume of the measurement channel is less than the total volume of the first channel so that only a portion of the fluid flowing in the first channel 136 is redirected to the measurement channel. In some cases, about 1% to about 25% of the volume of the fluid flowing in the first channel is diverted into the measurement channel. In some density channels, 1% to 15% (e.g., 2%, 5%, 7%, or 10%). In some cases, 1% to 5% of the volume of fluid in the first channel is diverted into the measuring channel.


The first pressure sensor 156a measures the pressure of the leaked fluid in the measurement channel 154 at a first location L1 and the second pressure sensor 156b measures the pressure of the leaked fluid in the measurement channel 154 at a second location L2 downstream of the first location L1 and the first pressure sensor 156a. The distances between the axis 119, about which the shaft 118 and the rotor 144 rotate, and the first and second locations L1, L2 are known and can be used to calculate the density of the fluid.


The processor 125 can be located either downhole or at a topside facility. The processor 125 includes one or more processors and non-transitory memory storing computer instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations, for example, the operations to determine density. Alternatively, or in addition, the processor 125 can be implemented as processing circuitry, including electrical or electronic components (or both), configured to perform the operations described here. The processor 125 is configured to determine a density of the fluid flow using the following equation:









ρ
=


2


(


p
1

-

p
2


)





k
¯

2




Ω
2

(


d
1
2

-

d
2
2


)







(

Eq
.

1

)








wherein p1 is the pressure measured by the first pressure sensor at the first location L1, p2 is the pressure measured by the second pressure sensor 156b at the second location L2, d1 is the radial distance between the axis 119 and the first location L1, d2 is the radial distance between the axis 119 and the second location L2, Ω is the angular velocity of the rotor, and k is a known constant, and ρ is a density of the fluid flow. Once density of the fluid flow is determined, then, the processor 125 can also determine a water-cut using the following equation:









WC
=


ρ
-

ρ
o




ρ
w

-

ρ
o







(

Eq
.

2

)








where ρo is a density of an oil portion of the fluid flow, ρw is a water density of the fluid flow, and WC is the water-cut. The oil density variation with temperature and pressure would have been obtained with pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) analysis on the hydrocarbon obtained in the early life of the well. In the operation of the ESP assembly 100, the downhole pressure and temperature can be obtained from the monitoring sub-system 122. Based on the temperature and pressure, the density of the pure oil can be determined and can be used in Equation 2. Density of water can be determined by the processor 125 based on the pressure and temperature of the fluid flowing through the ESP assembly 100. The processor 125 is configured to execute a computer-readable medium storing instructions to perform operations or methods. The executable method includes prompting a pump of an electric submersible pump assembly to pump fluid from a first end to a second end of the ESP assembly, prompting a motor to rotate a rotor of the ESP assembly about an axis such that the fluid at an outlet of a first channel of the rotor is at a higher fluid pressure than the inlet of the first channel, wherein inlet of the first channel is arranged radially closer to the axis than the outlet of the first channel, prompting a first pressure sensor in a measurement channel defined between the rotor and a diffuser to measure a first pressure, wherein the measurement channel extends from the outlet of the first channel to the inlet of the first channel, and prompting a second pressure in the measurement channel to measure a second pressure, wherein the second pressure sensor is arranged downstream of the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor is arranged radially closer to the axis than the first pressure sensor. In some cases, the executable method further comprises determining the density of the fluid in the measurement channel based on the first pressure signal and the second pressure signal. The motor can be prompted to rotate by a processor or by a driver at the surface. The driver may be a fixed driver or a variable frequency driver.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method 200 to determine the density of a fluid flowing in an ESP assembly. The method 200 is described with reference to the ESP assembly 100, however, the method may be applied to any applicable system, device, or arrangement. The method 200 for determining the density of the fluid 110 flowing in the electric submersible pump assembly 100 includes prompting, by the processor 125 (e.g., by the processor), the pump 108 to convey fluid from the fluid entrance 112 to the surface and prompting, by the processor 125 or by a driver (not shown) at the surface, the motor 120 to rotate the shaft 118 at a predetermined angular velocity such that the rotor 144 rotates about the axis 119 relative to the diffuser 138 of the ESP assembly 100. The driver may be part of the motor or may be separate from the motor. The rotation on the rotor 144 pressurizes the fluid 110 in the first channel 136. Due to the centrifugal forces, the fluid pressure at the outlet 152 of the first channel 136 is greater than the fluid pressure at the inlet 150 of the first channel because the outlet 152 is arranged radially farther from the rotational axis 119 than the inlet 150.


A majority of the fluid 110 continues to flow from the outlet 152 of the first channel 136 into the diffuser channel under the suction force of the pump 108, however, a portion of the fluid is diverted at the outlet 152 into the measurement channel due to the pressure drop from the outlet 152 to the inlet 150. The portion of fluid diverted into the measurement channel may be 1% to 5% (e.g., 1% to 30%) of the fluid flowing in the first channel 136.


The method 200 further includes measuring the first pressure at the first location L1 by prompting the first pressure sensor 156a to measure or read a first pressure. The first pressure is indicative of the pressure at the first location L1 in a measurement channel 154. The first location L1 is at a first radial distance dp1 from the axis 119 about which the rotor 144 and shaft 118 rotate. Next, the second pressure at the second location L2 is measured by prompting the second pressure sensor 156b to measure or read a second pressure. The second pressure is indicative of the pressure at the second location L2 in the measurement channel 154. The second location L2 is at a second radial distance dp2 from the axis 119 about which the rotor 144 and shaft 118 rotate. In the density meter 116, the first radial distance dp1 is larger than the second radial distance dp2, however, in some cases, the first radial distance may be less than the second radial distance. In some cases, the sensor sub-assembly includes a pressure differential sensor that determines the differential pressure between the first location of the measurement channel and the second location of the measurement channel.


After the first and second pressures, or the differential pressure, has been measured, the processor 125 determines the density of the fluid 110 using the first and second pressure signals, the first radial distance, the second radial distance, and a predetermined angular velocity of the shaft. The density can be determined using Equation 1. The processor 125 can also determine a water-cut of the fluid 110 based on the determined density of the fluid, a predetermined density of water and a predetermined density of oil. The water-cut can be determined using Equation 2.


A number of embodiments of the ESP assembly have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, some pumps and density meter may be arranged in different axial positions relative to the protector 124, the motor 120, and the monitoring sub-system 122.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an electric submersible pump assembly 250 arranged in a wellbore 102. The ESP assembly 250 is substantially similar to the ESP assembly 100, however, the pump 108 and density meter 116 are arranged axially downhole from the protector 124, the, and the monitoring sub-system 122, in an inverted pump configuration. The ESP assembly 250 further includes a second packer 254, a first fluid entrance 256 (stinger), a fluid discharge 258, a second fluid entrance 260 uphole from the first fluid entrance 256 and a perforated flow coupling 262. The second packer 254 isolates a portion of the wellbore below the (first) packer 134 and above the second packer 254. In this inverted pump configuration, the ESP assembly 250 can be deployed using a tubing deployment system in which the assembly is suspended from the flow coupling 262 by a production tubing. This configuration improves access to the motor 120. In the inverted configuration a packer 254 is used to prevent recirculation of high pressure fluid from the discharge 258 to the other (low pressure) side of the entrance 256.


In use, the fluid 110 downhole of the second packer 254 enters the first fluid entrance 256. The fluid 110 then flows through the density meter 116 and the pump 108 and exits the ESP assembly via the fluid discharge 258. The density of the fluid can be calculated as previously described with reference to FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3. The fluid 110, downstream of the first packer 134 and upstream of the second packer 254, then reenters the ESP assembly 250 by the second fluid entrance 260 and flows from the second fluid entrance 210 to the surface via the production tubing 114.



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an electric submersible pump assembly 300 arranged in a wellbore 102. The ESP assembly 300 is substantially similar to the ESP assembly 100, however, ESP assembly 300 is a cable deployed ESP assembly 300 in an inverted configuration and the ESP assembly 300 is arranged in a production tubing 302. In the inverted configuration, the pump 108, and density meter 116 are arranged axially downhole from the protector 124, motor 120, and the monitoring sub-system 122. The ESP assembly 300 further includes a tubing packer 304, a fluid entrance 256 (stinger), a fluid discharge 258, and a cable adapter 306. The cable adapter 306 is connected to a power cable 308 that extends from the ESP assembly 300 to the surface. The tubing packer 304 isolates a portion of the wellbore below the (fluid entrance 256) within the production tubing 302. A casing packer 310 is arranged between the production tubing 302 and the casing 132. The casing packer 310 seals the casing 132 so that fluid flowing from the formation enters the ESP assembly 300, not the annular space between the production tubing 302 and the casing 132. In this pump configuration, the ESP assembly 300 can be deployed using a cable deployment system in which the assembly is suspended by the power cable. In this configuration, fluid flows uphole through the production tubing 302 and can prevent damage to the structural integrity, for example formations of pinhole leaks, of the casing 132. This configuration can be used with reservoir fluid that contains corrosive gases, for example such as H2S, which can be damaging to the structural integrity of the casing 132 over a long period of time. In addition, cable deployed ESP assemblies can reduce installation time and can reduce retrieval time of the ESP assemblies as compared to tubing-deployed ESP assemblies, thereby increasing equipment uptime and reducing costs.


In use, the fluid 110 downhole of the tubing packer 304 and the casing packer 310 enters the fluid entrance 256. The fluid 110 then flows through the density meter 116 and the pump 108 and exits the ESP assembly via the fluid discharge 258. The density of the fluid can be calculated as previously described with reference to FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3. The fluid 110, then continues to flow towards the surface in the production tubing 302.



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an electric submersible pump assembly 350 arranged in a wellbore 102. The ESP assembly 350 is substantially similar to the ESP assembly 300, however, the ESP assembly 350 is arranged in the casing 132, without the production tubing 302. In the inverted configuration, the pump 108, and density meter 116 are arranged axially downhole from the protector 124, motor 120, and the monitoring sub-system 122. The ESP assembly 350 further includes a packer 352, a fluid entrance 256 (stinger), a fluid discharge 258, and a cable adapter 306 connected to a power cable 308. The packer 352 isolates a portion of the wellbore below the packer 352 from the portions of the well uphole of the packer 352. In this pump configuration, the ESP assembly 350 can be deployed using a cable deployment system in which the assembly is suspended from the cable adapter 306 by the power cable 308. This configuration improves producing up the casing may be used with non-corrosive reservoir fluid. The cable deployed ESP assemblies can reduce installation time and can reduce retrieval time of the ESP assemblies as compared to tubing-deployed ESP assemblies, thereby increasing equipment uptime and reducing costs.


In use, the fluid 110 downhole of the packer 352 enters the fluid entrance 256. The fluid 110 then flows through the density meter 116 and the pump 108 and exits the ESP assembly via the fluid discharge 258. The density of the fluid can be calculated as previously described with reference to FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3. The fluid 110, then continues to flow towards the surface in the casing 132.


In some embodiments, the density meter can be installed separately as a stand-alone unit or can be integrated into the pump at an intake section of the pump.


In some cases, the sensor sub-assemblies includes a plurality of pressure sensors (e.g., more than two) to increase flexibility and accuracy and to provide an average reading for the high pressure and low pressure measurement locations


In some cases, the pressure sensors of the sensor sub-assembly may be arranged at the same circumferential angle, however, some pressure sensors may be staggered. For example, in a case having two pressure sensors at the first (high pressure) location and two pressure sensors at the second (low pressure) location taps each for high-pressure and low-pressure measurements, the high-pressure sensors can be arranged at 90° and 270° circumferential angular position, whereas the low-pressure sensors can be arranged at 0° and 180° circumferential angular positions.


In some cases, the shaft is formed by multiple shaft sections. Each of the density meter, monitoring sub-system, and protector may be mounted on a shaft section. The shaft sections can be attached by shaft connections. z


In some embodiments, the density meter is incorporated into a Cable-Deployed Artificial Lift system, for example, a Cable Deployed ESP system or any artificial lift system.


While the density meter has been described as upstream of the pump, some meters are not arranged directly upstream of the pump. Rather, the density meter may be installed at the pump discharge (downstream of the pump) or anywhere along the length of the ESP assembly.


While the density meter has been described as measuring the density of a fluid in a wellbore, the density meter may also be used at the surface to determine a density of a fluid.


While a density meter with one rotor and one diffuser has been described, some density meters include multiple diffusers and multiple rotors. This configuration may reduce the entrance effects that can occur in a single rotor configuration. For example, incorporating multiple rotors can provide a more stable flow condition that is at equilibrium. In addition, this configuration may increase accuracy by increasing the pressure of the measured fluid, thereby reducing measurement of low magnitude pressures when measuring or calculating the density. In such a density meter, first and second rotors are mounted on a shaft and are arranged in the interior volume of a diffuser. The first and second rotors rotate at the same speed, however, the first and second rotors can rotate at different speeds. The first rotor has a first measurement channel with a first inlet and a first outlet. The second rotor has a second measurement channel with a second inlet and a second outlet. The first and second rotors are aligned along the axis so that the outlet of the first rotor channel of the first rotor is fluidly connected to the inlet of the second rotor channel of the second rotor. The first inlet is arranged radially closer to the axis than the first outlet. The second inlet is arranged radially closer to the axis than the second outlet. In some cases, the first outlet is arranged radially closer to or equidistant to the axis than the second inlet. The first rotor has a first measurement channel that extends from the first outlet to the first inlet and the second rotor has a second measurement channel that extends from the second outlet to the second inlet. The first and second measurement channels are substantially similar to the measurement channel described with reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B.


A sensor sub-system includes a first pressure sensor disposed in the first measurement channel at a first radial distance relative to the axis and a second pressure sensor disposed downstream of the first pressure sensor. The second pressure sensor is arranged at a second radial distance relative to the axis. The first and second radial distances may be known. The first radial distance is radially farther from the axis than the second radial distance. In some cases, the first radial distance is radially closer to the axis than the second radial distance.


The sensor sub-system includes a third pressure sensor disposed in the second measurement channel at a third radial distance relative to the axis and a fourth pressure sensor disposed downstream of the third pressure sensor. The fourth pressure sensor is arranged at a fourth radial distance relative to the axis. The third and fourth radial distances may be known. The third radial distance is radially farther from the axis than the fourth radial distance. In some cases, the third radial distance is closer to the axis than the fourth radial distance.


In some density meters, the sensor sub-assembly includes one pressure sensor in each measurement channel of the rotors. For example, the first measurement channel of the first rotor includes a first pressure sensor and the second measurement channel of the second rotor includes a second pressure sensor.


In some density meters, a plurality of pressure sensors (e.g., two pressure sensors) are arranged in the second measurement channel. In some cases, no pressure sensors are disposed in the first measurement channel.


While the rotor has been described as operating at the same angular velocity as the motor, some rotors may include a speed reducer to proportionally reduce the angular velocity of the rotor relative to the motor. In some cases, the density meter is connected to the motor via the speed reduce rather than directly to the shaft.

Claims
  • 1. An electric submersible pump assembly to measure a density of a fluid in a wellbore, the ESP assembly comprising: a fluid entrance,a shaft extending from a first end of the assembly to a second end of the assembly along an axis, wherein the shaft is rotationally connected to a motor; anda density meter fluidly connected to the fluid entrance, the density meter comprising: a diffuser having an interior volume defined by an inner surface,a rotor arranged in the interior volume of the diffuser and rotationally coupled to the motor via the shaft, the rotor comprising: an interior wall,a partition having a first face and a second face opposite the first face, anda rotor channel defined by the first face of the partition of the rotor and the interior wall of the rotor, wherein the rotor channel extends from an inlet to an outlet, wherein the inlet is fluidly connected to the fluid entrance of the ESP assembly and is arranged at a first radial distance from the axis, wherein the outlet is arranged at a second radial distance from the axis, wherein the first radial distance of the inlet is less than the second radial distance of the outlet; anda measurement channel, wherein the measurement channel is defined by the inner surface of the diffuser and the second face of the partition of the rotor, wherein the measurement channel extends from the outlet of the rotor channel to the inlet of the rotor channel, anda sensor sub-assembly arranged on the inner surface of the diffuser, the sensor sub-assembly configured to measure at least two pressures in the measurement channel.
  • 2. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the measurement channel is configured to flow fluid from the rotor channel.
  • 3. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the measurement channel is arranged adjacent to the rotor channel.
  • 4. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the sensor sub-assembly comprises a first pressure sensor arranged in the measurement channel at a first radial distance from the axis.
  • 5. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 4, wherein the sensor sub-assembly comprises a second pressure sensor arranged in the measurement channel at a second radial distance from the axis, wherein the first radial distance of the first pressure sensor is greater than the second radial distance of the second pressure sensor.
  • 6. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 5, wherein the first radial distance of the first pressure sensor is known.
  • 7. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 5, wherein the second radial distance of the second pressure sensor is known.
  • 8. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, further comprising: one or more processors; anda computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: prompting the motor to rotate the rotor of the ESP assembly about the axis such that the fluid at the outlet of the rotor channel of the rotor is at a higher fluid pressure than the inlet of the rotor channel, wherein inlet of the rotor channel is arranged radially closer to the axis than the outlet of the rotor channel,prompting a first pressure sensor disposed in a measurement channel defined between the rotor and a diffuser to measure a first pressure,prompting a second pressure sensor disposed in the measurement channel to measure a second pressure, wherein the second pressure sensor is arranged downstream of the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor is arranged radially closer to the axis than the first pressure sensor.
  • 9. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 8, wherein the operations further comprise determining the density of the fluid in the measurement channel based on the first pressure and the second pressure.
  • 10. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, further comprising a pump configured to convey fluid in a first direction from the inlet on the rotor channel to the outlet of the rotor channel.
  • 11. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 10, wherein the fluid flowing in the measurement channel flows in a second direction, opposite the first direction.
  • 12. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the first radial distance of the inlet of the rotor channel is known.
  • 13. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the second radial distance of the outlet of the rotor channel is known.
  • 14. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein a diffuser channel defined by the inner surface if the diffuser is fluidly connected to the outlet of the rotor channel and the fluid entrance of the ESP assembly.
  • 15. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 14, wherein the diffuser channel is arranged downstream of the rotor channel.
  • 16. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the rotor is rotatable relative to the diffuser.
  • 17. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the fluid is an oil-water mixture.
  • 18. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein a total volume of the measurement channel is less than the total volume of the rotor channel.
  • 19. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 18, wherein the total volume of the measurement channel is about 1% to about 20% of the total volume of the rotor channel.
  • 20. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 1, wherein the ESP assembly further comprises a pump configured to convey the fluid from the first end of the ESP assembly to the second end of the ESP assembly, wherein the pump is arranged upstream of the density meter.
  • 21. The electric submersible pump assembly according to claim 20, wherein the density meter forms an intake portion of the pump.
  • 22. A method to determine a density of a fluid flowing in an electric submersible pump assembly, the method comprising: rotating a shaft, by a motor, at a predetermined angular velocity such that a rotor of the ESP, rotationally coupled to the shaft, rotates about an axis relative to a diffuser of the ESP assembly, wherein the rotor defines a rotor channel, sensing, by a first pressure sensor, a first pressure indicative of the pressure at a first location in a measurement channel, wherein the first location is at a first radial distance from the axis sensing, by a second pressure sensor, a second pressure indicative of the pressure at a second location in a measurement channel, wherein the second location is at a second radial distance from the axis, wherein the first radial distance is larger than the second radial distance.
  • 23. The method according to claim 22, further comprising determining the density of the fluid based on the first and second pressures, the first radial distance, the second radial distance, and a predetermined angular velocity of the shaft.
  • 24. The method according to claim 22, wherein the density is determined using the equation:
  • 25. The method according to claim 22, wherein the method further comprises determining a water cut of the fluid.
  • 26. The method according to claim 25, wherein the water cut is determined based on the determined density of the fluid, a predetermined density of water, and a predetermined density of oil.
  • 27. The method according to claim 26, wherein the water-cut is determined using the equation; WC=P−Po/Pw−Po.
  • 28. The method according to claim 22, wherein the fluid is an oil-water mixture.
US Referenced Citations (390)
Number Name Date Kind
335164 Vitalis Feb 1886 A
646887 Stowe et al. Apr 1900 A
1559155 Bullock Oct 1925 A
1912452 Hollander Jun 1933 A
1941442 Moran et al. Dec 1933 A
1978277 Noble Oct 1934 A
2204857 Aladar Jun 1940 A
2216315 Aladar Oct 1940 A
2287027 Cummins Jun 1942 A
2556435 Moehrl Jun 1951 A
2625110 Haentjens et al. Jan 1953 A
2641191 Alfred Jun 1953 A
2782720 Dochterman Feb 1957 A
2845869 Herbenar Aug 1958 A
2866417 Otto Dec 1958 A
2931384 Clark Apr 1960 A
3007418 Brundage et al. Nov 1961 A
3022739 Herrick et al. Feb 1962 A
3034484 Stefancin May 1962 A
3038698 Troyer Jun 1962 A
3123010 Witt et al. Mar 1964 A
3129875 Cirillo Apr 1964 A
3139835 Wilkinson Jul 1964 A
3171355 Harris et al. Mar 1965 A
3175403 Nelson Mar 1965 A
3213797 McMahan Oct 1965 A
3229642 Lobanoff Jan 1966 A
3251226 Cushing May 1966 A
3272130 Mosbacher Sep 1966 A
3413925 Campolong Dec 1968 A
3516765 Boyadjieff Jun 1970 A
3638732 Huntsinger et al. Feb 1972 A
3680989 Brundage Aug 1972 A
3724503 Cooke Apr 1973 A
3771910 Laing Nov 1973 A
3795145 Miller Mar 1974 A
3839914 Modisette et al. Oct 1974 A
3874812 Hanagarth Apr 1975 A
3961758 Morgan Jun 1976 A
3975117 Carter Aug 1976 A
3981626 Onal Sep 1976 A
4025244 Sato May 1977 A
4096211 Rameau Jun 1978 A
4139330 Neal Feb 1979 A
4154302 Cugini May 1979 A
4181175 McGee et al. Jan 1980 A
4226275 Frosch Oct 1980 A
4266607 Halstead May 1981 A
4289199 McGee Sep 1981 A
4336415 Walling Jun 1982 A
4374530 Walling Feb 1983 A
4387685 Abbey Jun 1983 A
4417474 Elderton Nov 1983 A
4425965 Bayh, III et al. Jan 1984 A
4440221 Taylor et al. Apr 1984 A
4476923 Walling Oct 1984 A
4491176 Reed Jan 1985 A
4497185 Shaw Feb 1985 A
4576043 Nguyen Mar 1986 A
4580634 Cruise Apr 1986 A
4582131 Plummer et al. Apr 1986 A
4586854 Newman et al. May 1986 A
4619323 Gidley Oct 1986 A
4627489 Reed Dec 1986 A
4632187 Bayh, III et al. Dec 1986 A
4658583 Shropshire Apr 1987 A
4662437 Renfro May 1987 A
4665981 Hayatdavoudi May 1987 A
4741668 Bearden et al. May 1988 A
4757709 Czemichow Jul 1988 A
RE32866 Cruise Feb 1989 E
4838758 Sheth Jun 1989 A
4850812 Voight Jul 1989 A
4856344 Hunt Aug 1989 A
4867633 Gravelle Sep 1989 A
4969364 Masuda Nov 1990 A
4986739 Child Jan 1991 A
5033937 Wilson Jul 1991 A
5094294 Bayh, III et al. Mar 1992 A
5158440 Cooper et al. Oct 1992 A
5169286 Yamada Dec 1992 A
5180014 Cox Jan 1993 A
5195882 Freeman Mar 1993 A
5201848 Powers Apr 1993 A
5209650 Lemieux May 1993 A
5246336 Furukawa Sep 1993 A
5261796 Niemiec et al. Nov 1993 A
5269377 Martin Dec 1993 A
5285008 Sas-Jaworsky et al. Feb 1994 A
5303597 Noren Apr 1994 A
5323661 Cheng Jun 1994 A
5334801 Mohn Aug 1994 A
5335542 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 1994 A
5337603 McFarland et al. Aug 1994 A
5358378 Holscher Oct 1994 A
5482117 Kolpak Jan 1996 A
5494413 Campen et al. Feb 1996 A
5591922 Segeral et al. Jan 1997 A
5605193 Bearden et al. Feb 1997 A
5613311 Burtch Mar 1997 A
5620048 Beauquin Apr 1997 A
5641915 Ortiz Jun 1997 A
5649811 Krol, Jr. et al. Jul 1997 A
5653585 Fresco et al. Aug 1997 A
5693891 Brown Dec 1997 A
5736650 Hiron et al. Apr 1998 A
5755288 Bearden et al. May 1998 A
5834659 Ortiz Nov 1998 A
5845709 Mack et al. Dec 1998 A
5848642 Sola Dec 1998 A
5880378 Behring Mar 1999 A
5886267 Ortiz et al. Mar 1999 A
5905208 Ortiz et al. May 1999 A
5908049 Williams et al. Jun 1999 A
5921285 Quigley et al. Jul 1999 A
5954305 Calabro Sep 1999 A
6113675 Branstetter Sep 2000 A
6129507 Ganelin Oct 2000 A
6148866 Quigley et al. Nov 2000 A
6155102 Toma Dec 2000 A
6164308 Butler Dec 2000 A
6167965 Bearden et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176323 Weirich Jan 2001 B1
6179269 Kobylinski et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192983 Nemoth et al. Feb 2001 B1
6257332 Vidrine et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264440 Klein et al. Jul 2001 B1
6286558 Quigley et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289990 Dillon et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298917 Kobylinski et al. Oct 2001 B1
6325143 Scarsdale Dec 2001 B1
6357485 Quigley et al. Mar 2002 B2
6361272 Bassett Mar 2002 B1
6413065 Dass Jul 2002 B1
6414239 Gasque, Jr. Jul 2002 B1
6427778 Beall et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454010 Thomas et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463810 Liu Oct 2002 B1
6530211 Holtzapple et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544013 Kato et al. Apr 2003 B2
6546812 Lewis Apr 2003 B2
6547519 deBlanc et al. Apr 2003 B2
6550327 Van Berk Apr 2003 B1
6557642 Head May 2003 B2
6601460 Matema Aug 2003 B1
6601651 Grant Aug 2003 B2
6604550 Quigley et al. Aug 2003 B2
6619388 Dietz et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629564 Ramakrishnan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6679692 Feuling et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681894 Fanguy Jan 2004 B1
6726449 James et al. Apr 2004 B2
6733249 Maier et al. May 2004 B2
6741000 Newcomb May 2004 B2
6755609 Preinfalk Jun 2004 B2
6776054 Stephenson Aug 2004 B1
6807857 Storm, Jr. Oct 2004 B2
6808371 Niwatsukino et al. Oct 2004 B2
6811382 Buchanan et al. Nov 2004 B2
6848539 Lee et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856132 Appel et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857452 Quigley et al. Feb 2005 B2
6863137 Terry et al. Mar 2005 B2
6935189 Richards Aug 2005 B2
6993979 Segeral Feb 2006 B2
7017681 Ivannikov et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021905 Torrey et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032662 Malone et al. Apr 2006 B2
7086294 DeLong Aug 2006 B2
7093665 Dass Aug 2006 B2
7107860 Jones Sep 2006 B2
7226279 Andoskin et al. Jun 2007 B2
7259688 Hirsch et al. Aug 2007 B2
7262532 Seidler et al. Aug 2007 B2
7275592 Davis Oct 2007 B2
7275711 Flanigan Oct 2007 B1
7338262 Gozdawa Mar 2008 B2
7377312 Davis May 2008 B2
7562587 Atkinson et al. Jul 2009 B2
7647948 Quigley et al. Jan 2010 B2
7670122 Phillips et al. Mar 2010 B2
7670451 Head Mar 2010 B2
7699099 Bolding et al. Apr 2010 B2
7730937 Head Jun 2010 B2
7762715 Gordon et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770650 Young et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775763 Johnson et al. Aug 2010 B1
7819640 Kalavsky et al. Oct 2010 B2
7841395 Gay et al. Nov 2010 B2
7841826 Phillips Nov 2010 B1
7849928 Collie Dec 2010 B2
7905295 Mack Mar 2011 B2
8013660 Fitzi Sep 2011 B2
8016545 Oklejas et al. Sep 2011 B2
8066033 Quigley et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067865 Savant Nov 2011 B2
8197602 Baron Jun 2012 B2
8235126 Bradley Aug 2012 B2
8261841 Bailey et al. Sep 2012 B2
8302736 Olivier Nov 2012 B1
8337142 Eslinger et al. Dec 2012 B2
8419398 Kothnur et al. Apr 2013 B2
8506257 Bottome Aug 2013 B2
8568081 Song et al. Oct 2013 B2
8579617 Ono et al. Nov 2013 B2
8771499 McCutchen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8821138 Holtzapple et al. Sep 2014 B2
8905728 Blankemeier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8936430 Bassett Jan 2015 B2
8950476 Head Feb 2015 B2
8960309 Davis Feb 2015 B2
8973433 Mulford Mar 2015 B2
9080336 Yantis Jul 2015 B1
9133709 Huh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9157297 Williamson, Jr. Oct 2015 B2
9200932 Sittler Dec 2015 B2
9203277 Kori et al. Dec 2015 B2
9234529 Meuter Jan 2016 B2
9353614 Roth et al. May 2016 B2
9383476 Trehan Jul 2016 B2
9500073 Alan et al. Nov 2016 B2
9540908 Olivier Jan 2017 B1
9574438 Flores Feb 2017 B2
9587456 Roth Mar 2017 B2
9593561 Xiao et al. Mar 2017 B2
9631482 Roth et al. Apr 2017 B2
9677560 Davis et al. Jun 2017 B1
9759025 Vavik Sep 2017 B2
9759041 Osborne Sep 2017 B2
9915134 Xiao et al. Mar 2018 B2
9932806 Stewart Apr 2018 B2
9951598 Roth et al. Apr 2018 B2
9964533 Ahmad May 2018 B2
9982519 Melo May 2018 B2
10100596 Roth et al. Oct 2018 B2
10138885 Ejim et al. Nov 2018 B2
10151194 Roth et al. Dec 2018 B2
10253610 Roth et al. Apr 2019 B2
10273399 Cox et al. Apr 2019 B2
10287853 Ejim et al. May 2019 B2
10308865 Cox et al. Jun 2019 B2
10323644 Shakirov et al. Jun 2019 B1
10337302 Roth et al. Jul 2019 B2
10337312 Xiao et al. Jul 2019 B2
10378322 Ejim et al. Aug 2019 B2
10465477 Abdelaziz et al. Nov 2019 B2
10465484 Turner et al. Nov 2019 B2
10487259 Cox et al. Nov 2019 B2
10501682 Cox et al. Dec 2019 B2
10533558 Melo et al. Jan 2020 B2
10578111 Xiao et al. Mar 2020 B2
10844701 Xiao et al. Nov 2020 B2
10927643 Ejim et al. Feb 2021 B2
10941778 Xiao et al. Mar 2021 B2
20020074742 Quoiani Jun 2002 A1
20020079100 Simpson Jun 2002 A1
20020109080 Tubel et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020121376 Rivas Sep 2002 A1
20020153141 Hartman Oct 2002 A1
20030079880 Deaton et al. May 2003 A1
20030141071 Hosie Jul 2003 A1
20030161739 Chu et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030185676 James Oct 2003 A1
20030226395 Storm et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040060705 Kelley Apr 2004 A1
20050098349 Krueger et al. May 2005 A1
20050166961 Means Aug 2005 A1
20050217859 Hartman Oct 2005 A1
20060066169 Daugherty et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060076956 Sjolie et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060096760 Ohmer May 2006 A1
20070193749 Folk Aug 2007 A1
20070212238 Jacobsen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080093084 Knight Apr 2008 A1
20080187434 Neiszer Aug 2008 A1
20080236842 Bhavsar et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262737 Thigpen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264182 Jones Oct 2008 A1
20080290876 Ameen Nov 2008 A1
20080292454 Brunner Nov 2008 A1
20090001304 Hansen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090016899 Davis Jan 2009 A1
20090090513 Bissonnette Apr 2009 A1
20090110579 Amburgey Apr 2009 A1
20090151928 Lawson Jun 2009 A1
20090151953 Brown Jun 2009 A1
20090255669 Ayan et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090289627 Johansen et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090293634 Ong Dec 2009 A1
20100040492 Eslinger et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100122818 Rooks May 2010 A1
20100206577 Martinez Aug 2010 A1
20100236794 Duan Sep 2010 A1
20100244404 Bradley Sep 2010 A1
20100258306 Camilleri Oct 2010 A1
20100288493 Fielder et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300413 Ulrey et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017459 Dinkins Jan 2011 A1
20110024107 Sunyovszky et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110024231 Wurth et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110036568 Barbosa Feb 2011 A1
20110036662 Smith Feb 2011 A1
20110155390 Lannom et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110162832 Reid Jul 2011 A1
20110185805 Roux et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110203848 Krueger et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110278094 Gute Nov 2011 A1
20110296911 Moore Dec 2011 A1
20110300008 Fielder et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120012327 Plunkett et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120282119 Floyd Nov 2012 A1
20130019673 Sroka et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130300833 Perkins Jan 2013 A1
20130048302 Gokdag et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051977 Song Feb 2013 A1
20130066139 Wiessler Mar 2013 A1
20130068454 Armistead Mar 2013 A1
20130073208 Dorovsky Mar 2013 A1
20130081460 Xiao et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130175030 Ige Jul 2013 A1
20130189123 Stokley Jul 2013 A1
20130213663 Lau et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130248429 Dahule Sep 2013 A1
20130255370 Roux et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130259721 Noui-Mehidi Oct 2013 A1
20130272898 Toh Oct 2013 A1
20140012507 Trehan Jan 2014 A1
20140014331 Crocker Jan 2014 A1
20140027546 Kean et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140037422 Gilarranz Feb 2014 A1
20140041862 Ersoz Feb 2014 A1
20140116720 He et al. May 2014 A1
20140144706 Bailey et al. May 2014 A1
20140209291 Watson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140265337 Harding et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140265654 Satterfield Sep 2014 A1
20140341714 Casa Nov 2014 A1
20140343857 Pfutzner Nov 2014 A1
20140377080 Xiao et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150068769 Xiao et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150071795 Vazquez et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150192141 Nowitzki et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150233228 Roth Aug 2015 A1
20150308245 Stewart et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150308444 Trottman Oct 2015 A1
20150330194 June et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150354308 June et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150354590 Kao Dec 2015 A1
20150376907 Nguyen Dec 2015 A1
20160010451 Melo Jan 2016 A1
20160016834 Dahule Jan 2016 A1
20160169231 Michelassi et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160305447 Dreiss et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160332856 Steedley Nov 2016 A1
20170058664 Xiao et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170074082 Palmer Mar 2017 A1
20170122046 Vavik May 2017 A1
20170138189 Ahmad et al. May 2017 A1
20170159668 Nowitzki et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170167498 Chang Jun 2017 A1
20170175752 Hofer et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170183942 Veland Jun 2017 A1
20170194831 Marvel Jul 2017 A1
20170292533 Zia Oct 2017 A1
20170321695 Head Nov 2017 A1
20170328151 Dillard Nov 2017 A1
20180058157 Melo et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180066671 Murugan Mar 2018 A1
20180171763 Malbrel et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180171767 Huynh et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180172020 Ejim Jun 2018 A1
20180223854 Brunvold et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180226174 Rose Aug 2018 A1
20180238152 Melo Aug 2018 A1
20180306199 Reed Oct 2018 A1
20180320059 Cox et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180340389 Wang Nov 2018 A1
20180363660 Klahn Dec 2018 A1
20190032667 Ifrim et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190040863 Davis et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190234209 Ejim et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190271217 Radov et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190368291 Xiao et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200056462 Xiao et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200056615 Xiao et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200248538 Xiao et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200248695 Xiao et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200355184 Xiao et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210040826 Xiao et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210140290 Eslinger May 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (87)
Number Date Country
1226325 Sep 1987 CA
2629578 Oct 2009 CA
2168104 Jun 1994 CN
1507531 Jun 2004 CN
101328769 Dec 2008 CN
101842547 Sep 2010 CN
202851445 Apr 2013 CN
103185025 Jul 2013 CN
203420906 Feb 2014 CN
104141633 Nov 2014 CN
104533797 Apr 2015 CN
103835988 Jan 2016 CN
105239963 Jan 2016 CN
103717901 Jun 2016 CN
2260678 Jun 1974 DE
3022241 Dec 1981 DE
3444859 Jun 1985 DE
3520884 Jan 1986 DE
19654092 Jul 1998 DE
10307887 Oct 2004 DE
102007005426 May 2008 DE
102008001607 Nov 2009 DE
102008054766 Jun 2010 DE
102012215023 Jan 2014 DE
102012022453 May 2014 DE
102013200450 Jul 2014 DE
102012205757 Aug 2014 DE
0579981 Jan 1994 EP
0637675 Feb 1995 EP
1101024 May 2001 EP
1143104 Oct 2001 EP
1270900 Jan 2003 EP
1369588 Dec 2003 EP
2801696 Dec 2014 EP
2893301 May 2018 EP
3527830 Aug 2019 EP
670206 Apr 1952 GB
2173034 Oct 1986 GB
2226776 Jul 1990 GB
2283035 Apr 1995 GB
2348674 Oct 2000 GB
2477909 Aug 2011 GB
2504104 Jan 2014 GB
S 6189998 May 1986 JP
S 62142894 Jun 1987 JP
4019375 Jan 1992 JP
H 0443814 Feb 1992 JP
H 09254894 Sep 1997 JP
H 109196 Jan 1998 JP
2005076486 Mar 2005 JP
2013110910 Jun 2013 JP
2013245569 Dec 2013 JP
98500 Oct 2010 RU
122531 Nov 2012 RU
178531 Apr 2018 RU
WO 1995004869 Feb 1995 WO
WO 1998046857 Oct 1998 WO
WO 1999027256 Jun 1999 WO
WO 2002072998 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2005066502 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2009113894 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009129607 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2011066050 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011101296 Aug 2011 WO
WO 2011133620 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2011135541 Nov 2011 WO
WO 2012058290 May 2012 WO
WO 2012166638 Dec 2012 WO
WO 2013089746 Jun 2013 WO
WO 2013171053 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014127035 Aug 2014 WO
WO 2014147645 Sep 2014 WO
WO 2015034482 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015041655 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015084926 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2015123236 Aug 2015 WO
WO 2016003662 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016012245 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016050301 Apr 2016 WO
WO 2016081389 May 2016 WO
WO 2016089526 Jun 2016 WO
WO 2016160016 Oct 2016 WO
WO 2016195643 Dec 2016 WO
WO 2017021553 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2018022198 Feb 2018 WO
WO 2018096345 May 2018 WO
WO 2019243789 Dec 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (42)
Entry
Abelsson et al., “Development and Testing of a Hybrid Boosting Pump,” OTC 21516, Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, May 2-5, 2011, 9 pages.
Alhanati et al., “ESP Failures: Can we talk the same language?” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE paper, SPE ESP Workshop held in Houston, Apr. 25-27, 2001, 11 page.
Alhasan et al., “Extending mature field production life using a multiphase twin screw pump,” BHR Group Multiphase 15, 2011, 11 pages.
BakerHughes.com, [online], “Multiphase Pump: Increases Efficiency and Production in Wells with High Gas Content,” Brochure overview, retrieved from URL <https://assets.www.bakerhughes.com/system/69/00d970d9dd11e3a411ddf3c1325ea6/28592.MVP_Overview.pdf>, 2014, 2 pages.
Blunt, “Effects of heterogeneity and wetting on relative permeability using pore level modeling,” SPE 36762, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Journal 2:01 (70-87), Mar. 1997, 19 pages.
Bryant and Blunt, “Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media,” Physical Review A 46:4, Aug. 1992, 8 pages.
Champion et al., “The application of high-power sound waves for wellbore cleaning,” SPE 82197, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, May 13-14, 2003, 10 pages.
Chappell and Lancaster, “Comparison of methodological uncertainties within permeability measurements,” Wiley InterScience, Hydrological Processes 21:18 (2504-2514), Jan. 2007, 11 pages.
Cramer et al., “Development and Application of a Downhole Chemical Injection Pump for Use in ESP Applications,” SPE 14403, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 22-25, 1985, 6 page.
Danfoss, “Facts Worth Knowing about Frequency Converters,” Handbook VLT Frequency Converters, Danfoss Engineering Tomorrow, 180 pages.
DiCarlo et al., “Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet, oil-wet, and mixed-wet sandpacks,” SPE 60767, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 27-30, 1998, SPE Journal 5:01 (82-91), Mar. 2000, 10 pages.
Dixit et al., “A pore-level investigation of relative permeability hysteresis in water-wet systems,” SPE 37233, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1997 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistiy, Feb. 18-21, 1997, SPE Journal 3:02 (115-123), Jun. 1998, 9 pages.
Drozdov et al., “The Use of Umbilicals as a New Technology of Artificial-Lift Operation of Oil and Gas Wells without Well Killing when Workover,” SPE 160689, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at the SPE Russian Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Technical Conference and Exhibition in Moscow, Russia, Oct. 16-18, 2012, 8 pages.
Ejprescott.com [online], “Water, Sewer and Drain Fittings B-22, Flange Adaptors,” retrieved from URL <https://www.ejprescott.com/media/reference/FlangeAdaptorsB-22.pdf> retrieved on Jun. 15, 2020, available on or before Nov. 2010 via wayback machine URL <http://web.archive.org/web/20101128181255/https://www.ejprescott.com/media/reference/FlangeAdaptorsB-22,pdf>, 5 pages.
Fatt, “The network model of porous media,” SPE 574-G, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), I. Capillary Pressure Characteristics, AIME Petroleum Transactions 207: 144-181, Dec. 1956, 38 pages.
Geary et al., “Downhole Pressure Boosting in Natural Gas Wells: Results from Prototype Testing,” SPE 11406, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 20-22, 2008, 13 pages.
Glossary.oilfield.slb.com [online], “Subsurface Safety Valve (SSSV),” available on or before Feb. 26, 2013, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20130226223723/https://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/s/subsurface_safety_valve_sssv.aspx>, retrieved on Dec. 1, 2020, URL <https://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/s/subsurface_safety_valve_sssv.aspx>, 2 pages.
Godbole et al., “Axial Thrust in Centrifugal Pumps—Experimental Analysis,” Paper Ref: 2977, presented at the 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, ICEM15, Jul. 22-27, 2012, 14 pages.
Heiba et al., “Percolation theory of two-phase relative permeability,” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Reservoir Engineering 7:01 (123-132), Febmaiy 1992, 11 pages.
Hua et al., “Comparison of Multiphase Pumping Techniques for Subsea and Downhole Applications,” SPE 146784, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2011, Oil and Gas Facilities, Feb. 2012, 11 pages.
Hui and Blunt, “Effects of wettability on three-phase flow in porous media” American Chemical Society (ACS), J. Phys. Chem. 104 :16 (3833-3845), Feb. 2000, 13 pages.
Hunting-intl.com [online], “Mechanical Centralizers and Decentralizers” Mar. 2015, [retrieved on Aug. 25, 2020], retrieved from: URL <http://www.hunting-intl.com/titan/wireline-hardware-and-accessories/mechanical-centralizers-and-decentralizers>, 1 page.
Krag et al., “Preventing Scale Deposition Downhole Using High Frequency Electromagnetic AC Signals from Surface Enhance Production Offshore Denmark,” SPE-170898-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 27-29, 2014, 10 pages.
Laserfocusworld.com [online], “High-Power Lasers: Fiber lasers drill for oil,” Dec. 5, 2012, retrieved on May 31, 2018, retrieved from URL: <https://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/print/volume-48/issue-12/world-news/high-power-lasers-fiber-lasers-drill-for-oil.html>, 4 pages.
Li et al., “In Situ Estimation of Relative Permeability from Resistivity Measurements,” EAGE/The Geological Society of London, Petroleum Geoscience 20: 143-151, 2014, 10 pages.
Machinedesign.com [online], Frances Richards, “Motors for efficiency: Permanent-magnet, reluctance, and induction motors compared,” Apr. 2013, retrieved on Nov. 11, 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.machinedesign.com/motors-drives/article/21832406/motors-for-efficiency-permanentmagnet-reluctance-and-induction-motors-compared>.
Mahmud et al., “Effect of network topology on two-phase imbibition relative permeability,” Transport in Porous Media 66:3 (481-493), Feb. 2007, 14 pages.
Mirza, “The Next Generation of Progressive Cavity Multiphase Pumps use a Novel Design Concept for Superior Performance and Wet Gas Compression,” Flow Loop Testing, BHR Group, 2007, 9 pages.
Mirza, “Three Generations of Multiphase Progressive Cavity Pumping,” Cahaba Media Group, Upstream Pumping Solutions, Winter 2012, 6 pages.
Muswar et al., “Physical Water Treatment in the Oil Field Results from Indonesia,” SPE 113526, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 18-20, 2010, 11 pages.
Nagy et al., “Comparison of permeability testing methods,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 399-402, 2013, 4 pages.
Parker, “About Gerotors,” Parker Haffinfin Corp, 2008, 2 pages.
Purcell, “Capillary pressures—their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom,” Petroleum Transactions, AIME, presented at the Branch Fall Meeting, Oct. 4-6, 1948, Journal of Petroleum Technology 1:02 (39-48), Feb. 1949, 10 pages.
Rzeznik et al., “Two Year Results of a Breakthrough Physical Water Treating System for the Control of Scale in Oilfield Applications,” SPE114072, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the 2008 SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference, May 28-29, 2008, 11 pages.
Schöneberg, “Wet Gas Compression with Twin Screw Pumps,” Bomemann Pumps, Calgary Pump Symposium 2005, 50 pages.
Simpson et al., “A Touch, Truly Multiphase Downhole Pump for Unconventional Wells,” SPE-185152-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Electric Submersible Pump Symposium, the Woodlands, Texas, Apr. 24-28, 2017, 20 pages.
Slb.com [online], “AGH: Advanced Gas-Handling Device,” Product Sheet, retrieved from URL: <http://www.slb.com/˜/media/Files/artificial_lift/product_sheets/ESPs/advanced_gas_handling_ps.pdf >, Jan. 2014, 2 pages.
Sulzer Technical Review, “Pushing the Boundaries of Centrifugal Pump Design,” Oil and Gas, Jan. 2014, 2 pages.
Tm4.com [online], “Outer rotor for greater performance,” available on or before Dec. 5, 2017, via internet archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20171205163856/https://www.tm4.com/technology/electric-motors/external-rotor-motor-technology/>, retrieved on May 17, 2017, retrieved from URL <https://www.tm4.com/technology/electric-motors/extemal-rotor-motor-technology/>, 2 pages.
Wylde et al., “Deep Downhole Chemical Injection on BP-Operated Miller: Experience and Learning,” SPE 92832, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2005 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, May 11-12, 2005, SPE Production & Operations, May 2006, 6 pages.
Xiao et al., “Induction Versus Permanent Magnet Motors for ESP Applications,” SPE-192177-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Apr. 23-26, 2018, 15 pages.
Zhan et al., “Characterization of Reservoir Heterogeneity Through Fluid Movement Monitoring with Deep Electromagnetic and Pressure Measurements,” SPE 116328, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the 2008 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 21-24, 2008, 16 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220316319 A1 Oct 2022 US