Patent Grant
9951563
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable
This disclosure is related to the field of milling tools used to remove objects from a wellbore other than formations to be drilled. More particularly, the disclosure relates to mills that may be used in wellbores completed using multiple stage fracture treatments prior to configuring the wellbore for production as well as mills for scale removal/cleanouts, casing exits, etc.
In the process of fracture treatment of a well that penetrates a formation over an extended axial distance, the fracture treatment may be performed along separate axial intervals in successive stages. Various equipment is used to isolate each fracture treatment stage and that equipment creates restrictions inside the completed casing. In many cases, it is desirable to mill away the stage isolation equipment to allow as large a bore as possible (full casing/liner ID) to enhance hydrocarbon recovery. Up until very recently, most multiple stage fracture treatments included up to around 25 stages. The stage isolation equipment in such wellbores is typically milled out with either conventional junk mills (simple products with crushed carbide or sharp carbide inserts held in by weld), roller cone drill bits, and much less frequently with polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) mills.
The foregoing milling operations are typically performed using an hydraulic motor deployed in the wellbore at the end of a coiled tubing. Such operations are also conducted with small, sometimes truck mounted rigs with conventional drill pipe as well
Such milling operations are generally performed in small internal diameter well casings (e.g., 3.5 inches to-4.75 inches), and, therefore they use small diameters hydraulic motors that do not generate high torque. Stalling of such motors is very common and is a major concern when milling fracture stage isolation equipment as well as during other milling operations such as mills for scale removal/cleanouts, casing exits, etc. The inherent risk of motor stalling is one reason why junk mills and roller cone bits are preferred over PDC mills. Another reason the PDC cutter mills are not frequently used is that PDC cutters are often damaged because the materials used in the various parts of the fracture stage isolation equipment are of varying strength and are not consistently spaced within the cross-section of the interior of the wellbore casing. This results in high instantaneous loads on the mill, which may easily break PDC cutters.
In the process of milling out fracture stage isolation equipment it is important to the economics of the well that all the stage isolation equipment is milled in one milling operation, and such operation should be completed as quickly as possible. Therefore, using PDC mills known in the art, which are subject to damage as explained above, is not considered reliable. However, it has been observed that PDC mills can mill through the zone isolation equipment much faster than junk mills or roller cone bits. Roller cone bits generally work well, but due to the fact that most small diameter motors operate at a high RPM, and to the fact that small diameter roller cone bits have very small bearings, the rate of failure of seals & bearings on roller cones is relatively high. Roller cones are also a fairly expensive option for this type of work as they are a consumable (i.e., discarded after the run). Crushed carbide mills and PDC mills can be repaired, so the cost can be spread out over multiple operations to make the use of such mills more economical. Therefore, as with PDC mills, roller cone bits may not always be desirable due to the risk of premature failure.
More recently, multiple stage fracture treatment systems are being developed that include many more stages than using multiple stage systems known in the art. Such newer systems may include up to 100 stages in one lateral interval, and, in many cases, such systems include stage isolation devices that may use “drop balls” that are metallic, as contrasted with drop balls that are used in earlier multiple state fracturing systems made from composite materials. As a result, there is a need for a wellbore mill that can reliably and consistently mill wellbore devices and/or scale accumulation in one run, and complete such milling operation in an economically beneficial amount of time.
In various example embodiments of a mill according to the present disclosure, by placing one or more shaped inserts, for example, carbide gouging cutters, rotationally in front of shear cutters, for example, PDC cutters, the shear cutters may be protected from damage and allow the mill to function efficiently. In some example embodiments, shaped inserts or gouging cutters may be omitted from the radial center of the mill because the only equipment that needs to be milled in the center of a wellbore liner or casing is typically drop balls or soft materials such as elastomers or composites. Drop balls may have a much more consistent material cross section than other wellbore devices subject to milling, and therefore may result in more even loading on the mill. The evenness of the loading on the mill may be to an extent that the reliability of the shear cutters is not of concern. However, radially outwardly to the shoulder section of the mill, a mill according to the present disclosure may have shaped inserts rotationally in front of shear cutters as that part of the mill will be cutting through many different types of materials, including cast iron, and with a very interrupted cut.
There are two specific features of a mill according to the present disclosure that distinguish it structurally from a drill bit used to drill through rock formations.
First, the mill has a ballistic profile or longitudinally stepped profile instead of a cone profile (i.e., the centermost cutters are longitudinally ahead of cutters laterally displaced from the center of the mill instead of behind as in cone profiles). This type of profile does not work with formation drill bits because a cutter at the center of rotation extended axially outward from the rest of a formation drill bit would likely break as soon as the bit touched the bottom of the wellbore. In the case of a mill, however, there is typically nothing that the mill will be used to remove from the wellbore that is sufficiently hard to break the centermost cutter(s).
Second, the mill cutting structure does not extend all the way out to the gage of the mill (i.e., the gage pads define a slightly larger diameter than the rest of the cutting structure). Unlike drilling rock formations with an ordinary drill bit, fracture stage isolation and/or other wellbore equipment and materials to be milled are designed to crumble apart when milled. As a result, it is not necessary to have a cutting structure that extends all the way out to the full gage diameter of the mill. Further, by having no cutting structure at the maximum OD of the mill, the mill will be less likely to damage the interior wall (ID) of the wellbore pipe or casing.
On at least one, and in some embodiments all of the blades 12, are a plurality of shear cutters 16. The shear cutters 16 may be any type known to be used in fixed cutter drill bits, including but not limited to polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutters, each of which includes a diamond table affixed to a substrate such as may be made from tungsten carbide or other carbide. Other ones of the shear cutters 16 may be made entirely from metal carbide, such as tungsten carbide or cubic boron nitride (CBN). The shear cutters 16 may be brazed or otherwise affixed to the respective blade(s) 12 by brazing or other attachment means known in the art. Rotationally ahead of the shear cutters 16 on each blade 12 having such cutters, may be disposed one or more hard material inserts 18, for example, gouging or pick type cutters. Gouging type cutters are used in drill bits for drilling mine shafts or tunnels, among other uses. Such bits are known in the art as “claw” bits, one example of which is sold under the trademark QUIKLAW, which is a trademark of Drillhead, Inc. The inserts 18 may be made from tungsten carbide or tungsten carbide coated steel, for example. The inserts 18 may have a generally conically shaped or pointed end and may be affixed to the mill body 11 using any attachment means known in the art. The exact shape of the inserts 18 may be different in other embodiments; the pointed or conical shape used in the present example is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
A side view of the mill 10 shown in
The example embodiment shown in
In the present example embodiment a maximum intermediate diameter d(int) defined by the profile is less than a diameter of the drop ball 30 and is at an axial position L2 from the axial end of the mill 10 such that the mill 10 will penetrate through the entire drop ball 30 before contacting any other portion of the interior of the pipe or casing, e.g., a ball seat for the drop ball 30. That is, the axial position L2 is at least equal to the diameter of the drop ball 30 and the intermediate diameter d(int) is smaller than the diameter of the drop ball.
Examples of stepped profile mills according to the present disclosure are shown in oblique view in
It has been determined through experimentation that milling drop balls with a conventional profile mill may result in large portions of uncut drop ball material passing through the ball seat to axial position of the next drop ball (frac stage). Such uncut material may be difficult to mill when it is in contact with another drop ball. By creating a profile that allows the mill to completely penetrate and mill the center of the drop ball 30 before the drop ball 30 ball can be pushed through to the next frac stage is believed to result in the uncut drop ball material consisting of much smaller fragments. Such smaller fragments may facilitate the milling operation, especially when the drop balls 30 are made from solid metal.
In other embodiments, combinations of stepped diameter profile as shown in with a ballistic profile may be used. Example embodiments of such profiles are shown in
A mill made according to various aspects of the present disclosure may provide increased milling efficiency by the use of shear cutters, for example, PDC shear cutters, while reducing breakage thereof by shock loading by the use of gouging type cutters rotationally ahead of the shear cutters on one or more blades. Such gouging type cutters may be disposed at a selected lateral distance from the center of rotation of the mill body because of the expected structure of the equipment to be milled from a wellbore using a mill according to the present disclosure. Correspondingly, shear cutters may be disposed proximate the center of rotation because of the expected equipment to be milled using a mill according to the present disclosure without substantial risk of breakage of the shear cutter(s) so located by reason of shock loading.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Priority is claimed from U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/129,984 filed on Mar. 9, 2015.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120279785 | Gavia | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20140251594 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150030149 | Chu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150060149 | Herman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report of EP 161159468.4 dated Oct. 6, 2016. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160265281 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62129984 | Mar 2015 | US |
