The present disclosure relates to a safety system for drowning prevention, for example, in a wellbore drilling mud pit.
A wellbore is formed by drilling a subterranean zone (for example, a formation, a portion of a formation or multiple formations) using a drilling assembly that includes a drill bit. The drill bit is attached to an end of a drill string. The drill string is rotated, thereby rotating the drill bit. The drill bit is driven through the subterranean zone to form the wellbore. Drilling fluid (also called drilling mud) is flowed from the surface of the formation through the drill string. The drilling fluid flows out of ports in the drill bit and into an annulus formed between an outer surface of the drill string and the inner wall of the wellbore. The drilling mud flows in an uphole direction towards the surface. When doing so, the drilling fluid carries with it, debris that results from the drilling operation. At the surface, the debris is filtered from the drilling fluid (for example, using shale shakers), and the drilling fluid is collected in a mud pit. Pumps connected to the mud pump then pump the drilling fluid back through the drill string, and the flow process is repeated. The mud pits in which the drilling mud is collected can have dimensions large enough for a person or object to accidentally fall into the pit.
This disclosure describes technologies relating to wellbore mud pit safety systems.
In certain aspects, a fluid pit safety system to prevent drowning incidents in a fluid pit filled with a fluid is disclosed. The fluid pit safety system includes a plurality of sensors spatially disposed adjacent the fluid pit, a perimeter detection sub-system defining a perimeter arranged around an edge of the fluid pit, and a rescue device arranged in the fluid pit. The plurality of sensors are configured to detect a change in fluid height in the fluid pt. The perimeter detection sub-system is configured to detect a disruption in the perimeter. The rescue device is configured to move towards a surface of the fluid in the fluid pit in response to the plurality of sensors detecting the change in the fluid height in the fluid pit and the perimeter detection sub-system detecting the disruption in the perimeter.
In some cases, the fluid pit safety system also has a computer system operatively coupled to the plurality of sensors, the perimeter detection sub-system, and the rescue device, The computer system includes one or more processors; and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations including receiving a first signal from the plurality of sensors in response to the change in the fluid height in the fluid pit, receiving a second signal from the perimeter detection sub-system in response to detecting the disruption in the perimeter, and actuating a rescue sub-system connected to the rescue device to move the rescue device towards the surface of the fluid in the fluid pit.
In some embodiments, the rescue sub-system has a first motor connected to a first end of the rescue device. A second end of the rescue device can be attached to an anchor arranged on a floor of the fluid pit. In some systems, the first motor is configured to rotate in a first direction such that the first end of the rescue device moves axially within the fluid pit. In some the rescue sub-system comprises a second motor connected to a second end of the rescue device. The second motor can be configured to rotate in a first direction such that the second end of the rescue device moves axially within the fluid pit.
In some embodiments, the rescue device is a net.
In some fluid pit safety systems, a rescue sub-system comprises a plurality of rescue devices.
The perimeter detection sub-system can include at least one light emitter configured to emit a light beam; a plurality of field deflectors configured to direct the light beam, and at least one light beam detector configured to detect the light beam. The plurality of field deflectors may be arranged around the edge of the fluid pit. In some embodiments, the light beam detector is configured to detect the disruption of the perimeter in response to detecting an absence of the light beam emitted by the light emitter.
In some fluid pit safety systems, the plurality of sensors includes a fluid height sensor arranged above the surface of the fluid in the fluid pit. The fluid height sensor can be configured to detect an increase or decrease in the fluid height. The fluid height sensor can be an ultrasonic sensor.
In some embodiments, plurality of sensors includes gas detectors arranged above the surface of the fluid pit. 16. The gas detectors can be configured to sense concentrations of at least one of hydrogen sulfide and hydrocarbon gas.
Some fluid pit safety systems also include a camera configured to capture images of the fluid pit.
In some instances, the fluid pit safety system includes an alarm sub-system configured to notify an operator. The alarm sub-system is operatively coupled to a processor. The alarm sub-system can include a first alarm and a second alarm.
In certain aspects, a method for preventing a safety incident; the method includes detecting a state change of a perimeter detection arrangement arranged around an edge of a pit of fluid, detecting a change in fluid height using a plurality of sensors arranged above the fluid pit, and deploying a rescue device in the fluid pit in response to detecting the state change and in response to detecting the change in the fluid height.
Some methods include deploying a rescue device in the fluid pit comprises detecting a location of an object in the fluid. The location can be detected using a camera.
In some embodiments, the method also includes deploying the rescue device in the fluid pit further comprises raising a first end of a rescue device such that the first end is adjacent an edge of the fluid pit. In some methods, a motor raises the first end of the rescue device. The can be rescue device is a net.
In some methods, deploying the rescue device in the fluid pit further includes raising a first end of a plurality of rescue devices such that the first ends are adjacent an edge of the fluid pit.
In some embodiments, detecting a state change of a perimeter detection arrangement arranged around the edge of the fluid pit includes generating a light emitter perimeter around an edge of the fluid pit and detecting a break in the light emitter perimeter.
In some methods, detecting a state change of a perimeter detection arrangement arranged around the edge of the fluid pit includes actuating a visual alarm.
Some methods also include actuating an alarm to notify an operator of the safety incident. The alarm can be a visual alarm, an auditory alarm, or both a visual alarm and an auditory alarm.
In certain aspects, a fluid pit safety system to prevent drowning incidents in a fluid pit filled with a fluid, the system includes a plurality of sensors spatially disposed adjacent the fluid pit, a perimeter detection sub-system defining a perimeter arranged around an edge of the fluid pit, and a rescue device arranged in the fluid pit, The plurality of sensors include an ultrasonic sensor configured to detect a change in fluid height in the fluid pit. The perimeter detection sub-system is configured to detect an object crossing the perimeter. The rescue device includes a net.
A first end of the net is configured to move towards a surface of the fluid in the fluid pit in response to the plurality of sensors detecting the change in the fluid height in the fluid pit and the perimeter detection sub-system detecting the disruption in the perimeter.
The fluid pit safety system may reduce the frequency and severity of safety incidents (e.g., drowning incidents, hazardous gas incidents) in or adjacent a volume of fluid. The fluid pit safety system may also reduce the number of fatalities and/or injury that result from the safety incidents. The system may further expedite rescue by actuating a rescue device closest to the victim and alerting personnel to the safety incident.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
A safety system to detect a drowning incident and deploy a rescue device is disclosed. The safety system is arranged adjacent a pit of a hydrocarbon production facility, for example, a mud pit of a wellbore drilling system. The safety system includes a rescue sub-system, a perimeter detection sub system, and multiple sensors. Each of the rescue sub-system, perimeter detection sub system, and multiple sensors are operatively connected to a processor. The perimeter detection sub-system generates a crossable perimeter, for example, a light beam perimeter, around a pit. The multiple sensors monitors a change in the water height, and the rescue sub-system deploys the rescue device. When triggered, the perimeter detection sub-system signals to the processor that the perimeter has been broken, indicating that a person (or object) is near or approaching the fluid pit. The processor then prompts the multiple sensors to analyze the water height of the fluid pit. If the water height has changed, it can be inferred that the person or object near the fluid pit, fell into the fluid pit producing waves and that a drowning incident is occurring. The waves are measured as changes in water height, sensed by the multiple sensors. The processor, having determined that the perimeter has been broken and that the height of the waves have changed, causes the rescue sub-system to deploy a rescue device to aid the drowning victim and prompts an alarm system to alert near-by personnel of the drowning event.
The fluid pit safety system notifies rig personnel to a potential drowning incident in mud or fluid pits and deploys a rescue device to aid the drowning victim. The fluid pit safety system can increase safety and decrease fatal or traumatic accidents in an oil production environment. The fluid pit safety system may prevent the drowning victim from attempting to escape the pit, unassisted, using the edges of the pit. The edges of the pit are slippery and can increase the risk of injury to the drowning victim. The fluid pit safety system provides a safer path for rescue while also alerting any surrounding personnel. Further, the fluid pit safety system may operate autonomously, without human interference and may operate during a power failure.
In addition, the safety system also monitors pit levels to detect overflow using multiple gas sensors. The fluid pit safety system can detect dangerous gas leaks around or in the fluid pit. The safety system may be used in wellbore drilling system environments or may be applied to other environments with similarly sized bodies of fluid, for example, a recreational pool, reservoir, or pond to improve the safety of these environments.
In the fluid pit safety system 100, the fluid pit 102 is a mud pit of the wellbore drilling system. The fluid pit safety system 100 includes multiple sensors 106, spatially disposed adjacent the fluid pit 102, a perimeter detection sub-system 104 adjacent an edge 110 the fluid pit, and a rescue device 108.
The perimeter detection sub-system 104 generates a perimeter 112 and is arranged around the edge of the fluid pit 102. The perimeter may be arranged at or at a distance from an edge 110 of the fluid pit 102. The perimeter 112 is a light beam perimeter. As described below, the perimeter detection sub-system 104 is configured to detect a disruption in the perimeter 112, for example an object crossing the perimeter 112.
The perimeter detection sub-system 104 includes a light emitter 114, for example a light emitter, that is operable to emit a light beam 116. The perimeter detection sub-system 104 has multiple field deflectors 118a-d. The field sensor deflectors can be mirrors or light guides that reflect or guide the light beam. The field sensor deflectors are arranged periodically around the edge 110 of the perimeter 112 to direct the light beam 116 around the edge 110 of the perimeter 112.
The path of the light beam 116, which defines the perimeter 112 extends around the edge 110 of the fluid pit 102 and is received by a light beam detector 120. The field deflectors 118a-d are positioned 3 inches (in) to 6.5 feet (ft) from the edge 110 of the fluid pit 102. Some field deflectors are be positioned adjacent or within 1 inch feet to about 12 feet of the edge 110. The light emitter 114 and the light beam detector 120 are arranged adjacent each other, but oriented in opposite directions so that the perimeter 112 extends around a majority of the fluid pit. In some fluid pit safety systems, the light emitter and light beam detector are mechanically coupled to form a unit. The coupling of the light emitter and light beam detector may reduce the complexity of repairs to the light emitter or light beam detector. In some fluid pit safety systems, the perimeter extends around a portion of the fluid pit, for example a single side of the fluid pit. The light beam detector 120 is configured to detect a disruption of the perimeter 112 in response to detecting an absence of the light beam 116 emitted by the light emitter 114.
Some perimeters are other wavelength light beams or light barriers, for example using infra-red light or ultraviolet light. Some perimeters are light curtains. Some perimeters are image based perimeters, for example, a field of vision of a camera.
The fluid pit safety system 100 includes a computer system 122 arranged in a housing 124 adjacent the edge 110 of the fluid pit 102. Some computer systems are remotely located or are located elsewhere in the wellbore drilling system. The computer system 122 includes processor 126 and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the processors 126 to perform operations. The processor 126 is operatively coupled to the multiple sensors 106, the perimeter detection sub-system 104 and the rescue device 108. The processor 126 receives a signals from the perimeter detection sub-system 104 and the multiple sensors 106 and, in response, actuates the deployment of the rescue device 108.
The fluid pit safety system 100 also includes a camera 128 arranged adjacent the fluid pit 102 in the housing 124. Some cameras are arranged above the mud pit. Some cameras are arrange outside the housing. The camera 128 is a wide view camera that captures images of the fluid pit 102. The processor 126 is operatively coupled to the camera 128 such that the processor 126 analyzes images captured by the camera 128. The camera 128 is also operatively connected to a supervisor computer system (supervisor display) 130 such that the camera 128 transmits images or videos to the supervisor computer system (display) 130 when a drowning incident is detected. In some fluid pit safety systems, the camera transmits images or videos to the display when a perimeter disruption is detected by the perimeter detection sub-system. In some fluid pit safety systems, the camera transmits images or videos to the display when, alternatively or additionally to the perimeter disruption, a fluid height change outside a predetermined range is detected in the fluid pit by the multiple sensors.
An alarm sub-system includes a first alarm 132, for example, an LED, mounted on the housing 124 and a second alarm 134, for example a visual notification in the display device or an auditory alarm emitted from a speaker of the housing 124. The alarm sub-system is operatively coupled to the processor 126, such that the processor 126 prompts the first and second alarms 132, 134. The processor 126 prompts the first alarm 132 based on the signals received from the perimeter detection sub-system 104. Alternatively or in addition, the processor 126 prompts the second alarm 134 based on signals received from the multiple sensors 106 or based on both the signals received from the multiple sensors 106 and the signals received from the perimeter detection sub-system 104. Some fluid pit safety systems have a variety of auditory and visual alarms that notify workers, supervisors, and persons to the drowning incident.
A power supply 135 is electrically connected to the perimeter detection sub-system 104, the multiple sensors 106, a rescue sub-system (
In some fluid pit safety systems, the first alarm is not prompted by disruption of the perimeter alone. That is, the perimeter disruption signal alone does not indicate that a drowning incident is occurring, as the person could block the beam 116, break the perimeter 112, and move away from the fluid pit after viewing the first alarm 132 or recognizing his/her surroundings. Instead, receiving the perimeter disruption signal indicates to the processor 126 that the water height hfluid should be analyzed. If the water height hfluid is changing, particularly above a specified threshold, one can infer that the person who disrupted the perimeter 112 fell into the fluid pit 102 and generated waves in the fluid pit 102.
The fluid height sensor 136 emits a series of ultrasonic waves 140a over a period of time (e.g., 1 second, 3 seconds, 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 15 second, 20 seconds, 30 seconds) when prompted by the processor 126. The data generated by the fluid height sensor 136 is evaluated and/or analyzed to determine if the sensed fluid height haw or change in fluid height Δhfluid is outside a predetermined threshold (e.g., a fluid height that is greater than 3 ft, 4 ft, 5 ft, 6 ft, 7 ft, 8 ft, 9 ft, or 10 ft) or range (e.g., a change in fluid height that is more than 1 inch, 2 inches, 3 inches, 4 inches, 5 inches, or 6 inches). The predetermined threshold and/or range accounts for changes in fluid height due to various environmental stimuli, for example vibrations due to adjacent drilling equipment or wind. In some instances, the fluid height sensor continuously transmits ultrasonic waves and continually analyzes the reflected ultrasonic waves to determine the fluid height or change in fluid height. In some instances, the fluid height sensor periodically transmits ultrasonic waves and periodically analyzes the reflected ultrasonic waves to determine the fluid height or change in fluid height. The fluid height sensor may transmit ultrasonic waves every minute, every 5 minutes, every 15 minutes, every 30 minutes, every 45 minutes, or every hour.
Some fluid pit safety systems can compare the travel time to known travel times that correspond to known distances, thereby determining the exact distance of the fluid sensor from the surface. In such a system, the fluid height sensor also analyzes the waves reflected from the floor of the mud pit. The difference between the distance from the fluid height sensor to the fluid surface and the distance from the fluid height sensor to the bottom of the mud pit is the calculated fluid height. In some fluid pit safety systems, the depth of the fluid pit is known and the difference between the distance from the fluid height sensor to the fluid surface and the known pit depth is the fluid height.
The multiple sensors can include gas detectors 142 also mounted on the arm 138 of the housing 124 so that the gas detectors 142 are directly above the surface of the fluid pit 102. The gas detectors 142 are configured to sense concentrations hydrogen sulfide and hydrocarbon gas released from the fluid pit 102. The gas detectors 142 have a predetermined gas concentration threshold above which is considered a high gas concentration. When the gas detectors 142 measure a gas concentration (or multiple gas concentrations) below the threshold, the multiple sensors 106 do not transmit a signal to the processor 126. The detected concentration below the threshold may be categorized as a low or regular concentration. The gas detectors 142 send a third signal, e.g., a high gas concentration signal, to the processor 126 if the gas concentrations exceed the threshold, for example about 8 parts per million (ppm) to about 12 ppm (e.g., 10 ppm) for hydrogen sulfide and about 0 ppm to about 15 ppm (e.g., above 0 ppm) for hydrocarbon gas. In some systems, the threshold for each gas is the lower explosion level of the gas. In response to the high gas concentration signal, the processor 126 prompts the first alarm 132 to emit a light. Some processors 126, upon receiving a high gas concentration signal, prompt both the first alarm 132 and the second alarm 134. In some instances, the gas detector can have multiple threshold associated with specific gases, for example, a threshold concentration for hydrogen sulfide and a different threshold concentration for hydrocarbon gas.
The multiple sensors 106 are prompted by the processor 126 to take a water height measurement using the fluid height sensor 136, in response to the processor 126 receiving a perimeter disruption signal. In some fluid pit safety systems, the water height sensor continually measures the water height. In such a system, the processor receives a packet of water height data from the multiple sensors. If an object has fallen into the fluid pit 102, the water height changes. The fluid height sensor 136 detects changes in the fluid height Δhfluid and compares the changes in the fluid height Δhfluid to a predetermined range. If the changes in the fluid height Δhfluid are outside the predetermined range, the multiple sensors 106 transmits a water height change (second) signal. In some systems, the processor monitors the multiple sensors to detect changes in the fluid height. The processor 126 receives a second (water height change) signal from the multiple sensors 106. In response to receiving a perimeter disruption signal and a water height change signal, the processor 126 actuates a rescue sub-system (
The rescue device 108 is configured to move towards the surface of the fluid in the fluid pit 102, in response to the multiple sensors 106 detecting the change in the fluid height hfluid in the fluid pit 102 and the perimeter detection sub-system 104 detecting the disruption in the perimeter 112. The processor 126 prompts the rescue sub-system 144 to move the rescue device 108 from an undeployed position to a deployed position.
Initially, the perimeter 112 of the perimeter detection sub-system 104 extends from the light emitter 114 to the light beam detector 120 via the field deflectors 118a-d. The perimeter 112 extends around the edge 110 of the fluid pit 102. The light beam detector 120 monitors the perimeter 112 (step 182). The multiple sensors 106 monitors the concentrations of gases from the fluid pit 102.
A person (or other animal or object) moving about the wellbore drilling system breaks the perimeter 112 and disrupts the emission of the light beam 116 from the light emitter 114 to the light beam detector 120. The light beam detector 120 detects an absence of light and transmits a perimeter disruption (first) signal to the processor 126 (step 182). The processor 126 prompts the fluid height sensor 136 to detect a change in fluid height over time, for example between about 3 seconds to about 5 seconds. Some fluid height sensors detect over a time period of less than 3 seconds or more than 5 seconds, e.g., 0.5 seconds, 1 second, 2 seconds, 6 seconds, 10 seconds, or 15 seconds. The processor can also prompt the first alarm to emit a visual notification.
The fluid height sensor 136, arranged above the surface of the fluid, monitors the fluid height over the period of time. (step 186). If the fluid height does not change, or changes within a predetermined range, the fluid pit safety system 100 returns to the initial state. In such as case, the person or animal may have retreated after breaking the perimeter 112 or an object leaf have temporarily disrupted the light beam 116, for example a leaf. If the fluid height sensor 136 detects a change in fluid height Δhfluid, the fluid height sensor 136 transmits a fluid height change (second) signal to the processor 126.
In response to both the perimeter disruption signal and the fluid height change signal, the processor actuates the rescue sub-system 144 to deploy the rescue device 108 (step 188). The processor 126 also prompts the first and the second alarm 132, 134 to emit a visual and auditory alert. The processor 126 transmits images from the camera 128 to the supervisor computer system 130. In some fluid pit safety systems, the images captured by the camera are analyzed to determine the location of the person immersed in the fluid pit. To deploy the rescue device 108, the first motor 146 rotates in the first direction to move the first end 148 of the rescue device towards the surface. The motor 146 continues to rotate in the first direction until the rescue device 108 is able to bear the weight of the immersed person (about 225-250 lbs). In some cases, the first end of the rescue device is attached to multiple motors, so that the maximum load of the rescue device is increased. The first end 148 of the rescue device is adjacent or above the edge 110 of the fluid pit 102.
A supervisor can cancel the first and second alarms 132, and 134 after rescuing the immersed person from the fluid pit 102. The processor 126 prompts the rescue sub-system 144 to rotate in the second direction, sinking the rescue device 108 to an initial position for reuse.
The rescue sub-system 190 operates similarly to the rescue sub-system 144, however, the rescue sub-system 190 deploys the rescue device closest to the immersed victim. For example, in response to receiving the perimeter disruption signal and the water height change signal, the processor prompts the camera to capture images of the mud pit. The processor then processes the images and determined the location of the immersed victim relative to the anchor and determines the closest rescue device to the immersed victim. If the immersed victim is equidistant from both rescue devices, the rescue sub-system deploys both rescue devices. The motors continue to rotate in the first direction until the rescue devices are able to bear the weight of the immersed victim. The first ends of the rescue devices are adjacent or above the edge of the fluid pit.
In some fluid pit safety systems, the rescue device spans the width of the fluid pit. In some fluid pit safety systems the rescue device spans the length of the fluid pit.
While a rescue sub-system with a single motor has been previously described, some rescue sub-systems include a first motor attached to the first end of the rescue device and a second motor attached to a second end of the rescue device. The rescue device has three deployed positions. A first deployed position in which the first end of the rescue device is adjacent the edge of the fluid pit, a second deployed position in which the second end of the rescue device is adjacent the edge of the fluid pit, and a third deployed device in which the first and the second ends of the rescue device are adjacent the edge of the fluid pit. In such an embodiment, the rescue device can be flexible (e.g., a net) or rigid (e.g., a pole). In such an embodiment, the rescue sub-system does not include an anchor.
In use, the fluid height sensor 200 emits a series of ultrasonic waves 140a over a period of time (e.g., 1 second, 3 seconds, 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 15 second, 20 seconds, 30 seconds) when prompted by the processor 126 to take float device distance measurements. The reflected waves 140b reflect off the float device 202 and are received by the fluid height sensor 200. The data generated by the fluid height sensor 200 is evaluated and/or analyzed to determine if a sensed float device distance ddevice or a change in float device distance Δddevice. The float device distance ddevice is inversely proportional to the fluid height hfluid of the fluid in the fluid pit 102, whereas the change in the float device distance Δddevice fluid height is equal to the change in fluid height Δhfluid of the fluid in the fluid pit 102. The float device distance Δddevice and/or change in float device distance Δddevice are compared to a predetermined threshold (e.g., a float device distance that is greater than 3 ft, 4 ft, 5 ft, 6 ft, 7 ft, 8 ft, 9 ft, or 10 ft; or a change in float device distance that is more than 1 inch, 2 inches, 3 inches, or 4 inches). The predetermined thresholds account for changes in fluid height due to various environmental stimuli, for example vibrations due to adjacent drilling equipment or wind.
A large float device distance ddevice, e.g, 4 ft to 6 ft, indicates that the float device 202 is far from the fluid height sensor 200 and that the fluid height hfluid is low, as shown in
If the fluid height sensor 200 detects a small float device distance ddevice (high fluid height), when the fluid height sensor 200 is prompted by the processor 126, the fluid height sensor 200 transmits a high fluid level signal to the processor 126. With the high fluid level signal from the fluid height sensor 200, and the perimeter disruption signal from the perimeter detection sub-system 104, the processor 126 can infer that a drowning incident is occurring and prompts the rescue sub-system 144 to deploy the rescue device 108.
The fluid height sensor 200 can also determine the change in float device distance Δddevice, rather than or in addition to the float device distance ddevice. The fluid height sensor 200 emits a series of ultrasonic waves 140a over a period of time (e.g., 3 seconds) when prompted by the processor 126 to take float device distance measurements. As previously described, the fluid height sensor 200 determines the distance between the float device and the fluid height sensor 200 (float device distance ddevice). The fluid height sensor 200 can further process the data generated by fluid height sensor 200 and compare changes in float device distance Δddevice over time.
The fluid height sensor 200 may detect a change in float device distance Δddevice, for example the float device distance ddevice taken at 1 second may be less that the float device distance ddevice taken at 2 seconds over the 3 second time period. This change in float device distance Δddevice is equal to the change in fluid height Δhfluid. The difference between the largest float device distance ddevice measured over the time period and the smallest float device distance ddevice measured over the time period is compared to a threshold. The threshold may be 2 in, 3 in, 4 in, 5 in, or 6 in. If the difference is less than the threshold, the change in fluid height Δhfluid is decidedly negligible and may be, for example, small waves caused by wind. If the difference is at or greater than the threshold, the change in fluid height Δhfluid is significant and indicates that a large object (e.g., a drowning victim) has fallen in the fluid pit 102. The fluid height sensor 200 transmits a fluid level change signal to the processor 126.
With the fluid level change signal from the fluid height sensor 200, and the perimeter disruption signal from the perimeter detection sub-system, the processor 126 can infer that a drowning incident is occurring and prompts the rescue sub-system 144 to deploy the rescue device 108.
While the field deflectors of the perimeter detection sub-system have been described as light guides, some field deflectors are light detectors attached to light beam emitters. The perimeter detection sub-system further includes a power source for each field deflector and a wireless connection to the processor. The field deflectors each include a light beam detector and a light emitter. The light emitters can be arranged at an angle relative to the light beam detector so that the emitted light beam follows the edge of the fluid pit. The light beam detectors are configured to detect a beam of light from a light emitter of a different field deflector or from the light emitter of the perimeter detection sub-system.
An exemplary method of a perimeter detection sub-system with two field deflectors (a first and second field detector) is described, however, the method can be applied to a perimeter detection sun-system with more than two field deflectors, e.g., three to thirty field deflections. In use, the perimeter detection sub-system emits a first light beam using the light emitter of the perimeter detection sub-system. The first emitted light beam is received by a light beam detector of a first field deflector. The first field deflector then transmits a perimeter maintained signal to the processor indicating that the first light beam has been received. Regardless of the detection of the first light beam, the first field deflector emits second light beam using a light emitter of the first deflector. The second light beam is received by a light beam detector of a second field deflector. The second field deflector transmits a perimeter maintained signal to the processor indicating that the second light beam has been received. Regardless of the detection of the second light beam, the second field deflector emits third light beam using a light emitter of the second deflector. The light detector of the perimeter detection sub-system receives the third light beam and transmits a perimeter maintained signal to the processor indicating that the third light beam has been detected. The perimeter is defined by the first, second, and third light beams.
If any of the first, second, or third light beams are broken (e.g., by a person crossing the perimeter) the light detectors of the first field detector, second field detector, or perimeter detection sub-system, respectively, do not detect the first, second, or third light beam. As a result, the light beam detector that did not detect a light beam transmits a perimeter disruption signal to the processor.
The processor, upon receiving perimeter maintained signals from all light beam detectors, can infer that the perimeter has not been disrupted. If one or more of the light beam detectors transmit a perimeter disruption signal, the processor can infer that the perimeter was disrupted between the signaling light detector and the preceding light emitter. For example, if the light beam detector of the second field deflector did not detect a light beam, the perimeter disruption can be inferred to occur between the first field deflector and the second field deflector.
This configuration can indicate with greater accuracy where the perimeter was disrupted and the area in which the drowning victim fell in. In response, a system with multiple rescue devices, may deploy the device closest to the light detector that sensed the light beam disruption and/or the light emitter that produced the disrupted light beam. The camera may also point to the indicated area first when transmitting images to the supervisor display.
While a rescue sub-system has been described as having a rescue device movable by a motor, some rescue devices are flotation devices. In such an embodiment, the rescue sub-system includes a rescue device retainer, for example a hook arranged on the floor of the fluid pit. The flotation device may be arranged on the floor of the fluid pit retained in the retainer. To deploy the rescue device, the rescue sub-system releases the retainer and the flotation device rises to the surface of the fluid.
In some rescue systems, the rescue device may be arranged at the edge of the fluid pit. The rescue sub-system includes a spring releasably attached to the rescue device, held in a tensioned position. To deploy the rescue device the spring is released and the rescue device is thrust to the surface of the fluid pit due to a force of the relaxing spring. In some embodiments the processor aims the spring toward the location of the immersed victim.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
880404 | Sanford | Feb 1908 | A |
1033655 | Baker | Jul 1912 | A |
1258273 | Titus et al. | Mar 1918 | A |
1392650 | Mcmillian | Oct 1921 | A |
1491066 | Patrick | Apr 1924 | A |
1580352 | Ercole | Apr 1926 | A |
1591264 | Baash | Jul 1926 | A |
1621947 | Moore | Mar 1927 | A |
1638494 | Lewis et al. | Aug 1927 | A |
1789993 | Switzer | Jan 1931 | A |
1796762 | Paston | Mar 1931 | A |
1896236 | Howard | Feb 1933 | A |
1896482 | Crowell | Feb 1933 | A |
1897297 | Brown | Feb 1933 | A |
1949498 | Frederick et al. | Mar 1934 | A |
2047774 | Greene | Jul 1936 | A |
2121002 | Baker | Jun 1938 | A |
2121051 | Ragan et al. | Jun 1938 | A |
2187487 | Burt | Jan 1940 | A |
2189697 | Baker | Feb 1940 | A |
2222233 | Mize | Nov 1940 | A |
2286075 | Evans | Jun 1942 | A |
2304793 | Bodine | Dec 1942 | A |
2316402 | Canon | Apr 1943 | A |
2327092 | Botkin | Aug 1943 | A |
2377249 | Lawrence | May 1945 | A |
2411260 | Glover et al. | Nov 1946 | A |
2481637 | Yancey | Sep 1949 | A |
2546978 | Collins et al. | Apr 1951 | A |
2638988 | Williams | May 1953 | A |
2663370 | Robert et al. | Dec 1953 | A |
2672199 | McKenna | Mar 1954 | A |
2701019 | Steed | Feb 1955 | A |
2707998 | Baker et al. | May 1955 | A |
2708973 | Twining | May 1955 | A |
2728599 | Moore | Dec 1955 | A |
2734581 | Bonner | Feb 1956 | A |
2745693 | Mcgill | May 1956 | A |
2751010 | Trahan | Jun 1956 | A |
2762438 | Naylor | Sep 1956 | A |
2778428 | Baker et al. | Jan 1957 | A |
2806532 | Baker et al. | Sep 1957 | A |
2881838 | Morse et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2887162 | Le Bus et al. | May 1959 | A |
2912053 | Bruekelman | Nov 1959 | A |
2912273 | Chadderdon et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
2915127 | Abendroth | Dec 1959 | A |
2947362 | Smith | Aug 1960 | A |
2965175 | Ransom | Dec 1960 | A |
2965177 | Le Bus et al. | Dec 1960 | A |
2965183 | Le Bus et al. | Dec 1960 | A |
3005506 | Le Bus et al. | Oct 1961 | A |
3023810 | Anderson | Mar 1962 | A |
3116799 | Lemons | Jan 1964 | A |
3147536 | Lamphere | Sep 1964 | A |
3225828 | Wisenbaker et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3308886 | Evans | Mar 1967 | A |
3352593 | Webb | Nov 1967 | A |
3369603 | Trantham | Feb 1968 | A |
3376934 | William | Apr 1968 | A |
3380528 | Durwood | Apr 1968 | A |
3381748 | Peters et al. | May 1968 | A |
3382925 | Jennings | May 1968 | A |
3437136 | Young | Apr 1969 | A |
3667721 | Vujasinovic | Jun 1972 | A |
3747674 | Murray | Jul 1973 | A |
3752230 | Bernat et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3897038 | Le Rouax | Jul 1975 | A |
3915426 | Le Rouax | Oct 1975 | A |
4030354 | Scott | Jun 1977 | A |
4039798 | Lyhall et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4042019 | Henning | Aug 1977 | A |
4059155 | Greer | Nov 1977 | A |
4099699 | Allen | Jul 1978 | A |
4190112 | Davis | Feb 1980 | A |
4227573 | Pearce et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4254983 | Harris | Mar 1981 | A |
4276931 | Murray | Jul 1981 | A |
4296822 | Ormsby | Oct 1981 | A |
4349071 | Fish | Sep 1982 | A |
4391326 | Greenlee | Jul 1983 | A |
4407367 | Kydd | Oct 1983 | A |
4412130 | Winters | Oct 1983 | A |
4413642 | Smith et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4422948 | Corley et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4467996 | Baugh | Aug 1984 | A |
4515212 | Krugh | May 1985 | A |
4538684 | Sheffield | Sep 1985 | A |
4562888 | Collet | Jan 1986 | A |
4603578 | Stolz | Aug 1986 | A |
4616721 | Furse | Oct 1986 | A |
4696502 | Desai | Sep 1987 | A |
4834184 | Streich et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836289 | Young | Jun 1989 | A |
4869321 | Hamilton | Sep 1989 | A |
4877085 | Pullig, Jr. | Oct 1989 | A |
4898245 | Braddick | Feb 1990 | A |
4928762 | Mamke | May 1990 | A |
4953617 | Ross et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4997225 | Denis | Mar 1991 | A |
5012863 | Springer | May 1991 | A |
5054833 | Bishop et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060737 | Mohn | Oct 1991 | A |
5117909 | Wilton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129956 | Christopher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5176208 | Lalande et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178219 | Streich et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197547 | Morgan | Mar 1993 | A |
5203646 | Landsberger et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5295541 | Ng et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5330000 | Givens et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5358048 | Brooks | Oct 1994 | A |
5392715 | Pelrine | Feb 1995 | A |
5456312 | Lynde et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5507346 | Gano et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5580114 | Palmer | Dec 1996 | A |
5584342 | Swinford | Dec 1996 | A |
5605366 | Beeman | Feb 1997 | A |
5639135 | Beeman | Jun 1997 | A |
5667015 | Harestad et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673754 | Taylor | Oct 1997 | A |
5678635 | Dunlap et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685982 | Foster | Nov 1997 | A |
5806596 | Hardy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832547 | Burroughs | Nov 1998 | A |
5833001 | Song et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842518 | Soybel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5881816 | Wright | Mar 1999 | A |
5924489 | Hatcher | Jul 1999 | A |
5944101 | Hearn | Aug 1999 | A |
6070665 | Singleton et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6112809 | Angle | Sep 2000 | A |
6130615 | Poteet | Oct 2000 | A |
6138764 | Scarsdale et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155428 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6247542 | Kruspe et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276452 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6371204 | Singh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378627 | Tubel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6491108 | Slup et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510947 | Schulte et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6595289 | Tumlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6637511 | Linaker | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6679330 | Compton et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6688386 | Comelssen | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698712 | Milberger et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729392 | DeBerry et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6768106 | Gzara et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6808023 | Smith et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811032 | Schulte et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6880639 | Rhodes et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899178 | Tubel | May 2005 | B2 |
6913084 | Boyd | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7049272 | Sinclair et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051810 | Halliburton | May 2006 | B2 |
7096950 | Howlett et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117956 | Grattan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150328 | Marketz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7188674 | McGavern, III et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188675 | Reynolds | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7218235 | Rainey | May 2007 | B1 |
7231975 | Lavaure et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249633 | Ravensbergen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7275591 | Allen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284611 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303010 | de Guzman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7398832 | Brisco | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405182 | Verrett | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418860 | Austerlitz et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424909 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7488705 | Reddy et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497260 | Telfer | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7591305 | Brookey et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600572 | Slup et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7617876 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621324 | Atencio | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7712527 | Roddy | May 2010 | B2 |
7735564 | Guerrero | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762323 | Frazier | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7802621 | Richards et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7934552 | La Rovere | May 2011 | B2 |
7965175 | Yamano | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002049 | Keese et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8056621 | Ring et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069916 | Giroux et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8201693 | Jan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210251 | Lynde et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8376051 | McGrath et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8453724 | Zhou | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8496055 | Mootoo et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8579024 | Mailand et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8596463 | Burkhard | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8726983 | Khan | May 2014 | B2 |
8770276 | Nish et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8899338 | Elsayed et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8991489 | Redlinger et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9079222 | Burnett et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9109433 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9133671 | Kellner | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9163469 | Broussard et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9181782 | Berube et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9212532 | Leuchtenberg et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9234394 | Wheater et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9359861 | Burgos | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9410066 | Ghassemzadeh | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9416617 | Wiese et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9551200 | Read et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9574417 | Laird et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9657213 | Murphy et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9976407 | Ash et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10087752 | Bedonet | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10198929 | Snyder | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10266698 | Cano et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10280706 | Sharp, III | May 2019 | B1 |
10301898 | Orban | May 2019 | B2 |
10301989 | Imada | May 2019 | B2 |
10584546 | Ford | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10626698 | Al-Mousa et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10837254 | Al-Mousa et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20020053428 | Maples | May 2002 | A1 |
20030047312 | Bell | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030098064 | Kohli et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132224 | Spencer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040040707 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065446 | Tran et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074819 | Burnett | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095248 | Mandel | May 2004 | A1 |
20050056427 | Clemens et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050167097 | Sommers et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050263282 | Jeffrey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060082462 | Crook | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105896 | Smith et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070137528 | Le Roy-Ddelage et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070181304 | Rankin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204999 | Cowie et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070256867 | DeGeare et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080087439 | Dallas | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080236841 | Howlett et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251253 | Lumbye | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080314591 | Hales et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090194290 | Parks et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250220 | Stamoulis | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100162812 | Parkinson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176956 | Moerschell | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100258289 | Lynde et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100263856 | Lynde et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270018 | Howlett | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110036570 | La Rovere et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110056681 | Khan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067869 | Bour et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110168411 | Braddick | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110203794 | Moffitt et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110259609 | Hessels et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273291 | Adams | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110278021 | Travis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120012335 | White et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120067447 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120118571 | Zhou | May 2012 | A1 |
20120170406 | DiFoggio et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120285684 | Crow et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130134704 | Klimack | May 2013 | A1 |
20130213654 | Dewey et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130240207 | Frazier | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130269097 | Alammari | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296199 | Ghassemzadeh | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140138091 | Fuhst | May 2014 | A1 |
20140158350 | Castillo et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140231068 | Isaksen | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251616 | O'Rourke et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150013994 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150047132 | Sveum | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150096738 | Atencio | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160076327 | Glaser et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160084034 | Roane et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160130914 | Steele | May 2016 | A1 |
20160160106 | Jamison et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160237810 | Beaman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160281458 | Greenlee | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160305215 | Harris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160340994 | Ferguson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170044864 | Sabins et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170058628 | Wijk et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067313 | Connell et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170089166 | Sullivan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180010418 | VanLue | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180030809 | Harestad et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080318 | Schexnaider et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180187498 | Soto et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180209565 | Lingnau | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180245427 | Jimenez et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180252069 | Abdollah et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190024473 | Arefi | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190049017 | McAdam et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190087548 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190186232 | Ingram | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190203551 | Davis et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190284894 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190284898 | Fagna et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190316424 | Robichaux et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190338615 | Landry | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190375486 | Beckman | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200032604 | Al-Ramadhan | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200056446 | Al-Mousa et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20210180449 | Jamison | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210215036 | Heath | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
636642 | May 1993 | AU |
2007249417 | Nov 2007 | AU |
2441138 | Mar 2004 | CA |
2734032 | Jun 2016 | CA |
203292820 | Nov 2013 | CN |
103785923 | Jun 2016 | CN |
104712320 | Dec 2016 | CN |
107060679 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107191152 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107227939 | Oct 2017 | CN |
2545245 | Apr 2017 | DK |
2236742 | Aug 2017 | DK |
2964874 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2545245 | Apr 2017 | EP |
958734 | May 1964 | GB |
2392183 | Feb 2004 | GB |
2414586 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2425138 | Oct 2006 | GB |
2453279 | Jan 2009 | GB |
2492663 | Jan 2014 | GB |
5503 | Apr 1981 | OA |
WO 1989012728 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO 1996039570 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 2002090711 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2010132807 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2012164023 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2013109248 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2015112022 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO 2016011085 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016040310 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016140807 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2017043977 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 2018017104 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2018164680 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2019027830 | Feb 2019 | WO |
WO 2019132877 | Jul 2019 | WO |
WO 2019231679 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Al-Ansari et al., “Thermal Activated Resin to Avoid Pressure Build-Up in Casing-Casing Annulus (CCA),” SA-175425-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Offshore Europe Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 8-11, 2015, 11 pages. |
Al-Ibrahim et al., “Automated Cyclostratigraphic Analysis in Carbonate Mudrocks Using Borehole Images,” Article #41425, posted presented at the 2014 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Search and Discovery, Apr. 6-9, 2014, 4 pages. |
Bautista et al., “Probability-based Dynamic TimeWarping for Gesture Recognition on RGB-D data,” WDIA 2012: Advances in Depth Image Analysis and Application, 126-135, International Workshop on Depth Image Analysis and Applications, 2012, 11 pages. |
Boriah et al., “Similarity Measures for Categorical Data: A Comparative Evaluation,” presented at the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SDM 2008, Apr. 24-26, 2008, 12 pages. |
Bruton et al., “Whipstock Options for Sidetracking,” Oilfield Review, Spring 2014, 26:1, 10 pages. |
Edwards et al., “Assessing Uncertainty in Stratigraphic Correlation: A Stochastic Method Based on Dynamic Time Warping,” RM13, Second EAGE Integrated Reservoir Modelling Conference, Nov. 16-19, 2014, 2 pages. |
Edwards, “Constructionde modèles stratigraphiques è partir de données éparses,” Stratigraphie, Université de Lorraine, 2017, 133 pages, English abstract. |
Fischer, “The Lofer Cyclothems of the Alpine Triassic,” published in Merriam, Symposium on Cyclic Sedimentation: Kansas Geological Survey (KGS), Bulletin, 1964, 169: 107-149, 50 pages. |
Hernandez-Vela et al., “Probability-based Dynamic Time Warping and Bag-of-Visual-and-Depth-Words for human Gesture Recognition in RGB-D,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 2014, 50: 112-121, 10 pages. |
Herrera and Bann, “Guided seismic-to-well tying based on dynamic time warping,” SEG Las Vegas 2012 Annual Meeting, Nov. 2012, 6 pages. |
Keogh and Ratanamahatana, “Exact indexing of dynamic time warping,” Knowledge and Information Systems, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., 2004, 29 pages. |
Lallier et al., “3D Stochastic Stratigraphic Well Correlation of Carbonate Ramp Systems,” IPTC 14046, International Petroleum Technology Conference (IPTC), presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dec. 7-9, 2009, 5 pages. |
Lallier et al., “Management of ambiguities in magneto stratigraphic correlation,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2013, 371-372: 26-36, 11 pages. |
Lallier et al., “Uncertainty assessment in the stratigraphic well correlation of a carbonate ramp: Method and application of the Beausset Basin, SE France,” C. R. Geoscience, 2016, 348: 499-509, 11 pages. |
Lineman et al., “Well to Well Log Correlation Using Knowledge-Based Systems and Dynamic Depth Warping,” SPWLA Twenty-Eighth Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 29-Jul. 2, 1987, 25 pages. |
Nakanishi and Nakagawa, “Speaker-Independent Word Recognition by Less Cost and Stochastic Dynamic Time Warping Method,” ISCA Archive, European Conference on Speech Technology, Sep. 1987, 4 pages. |
Pels et al., “Automated biostratigraphic correlation of palynological records on the basis of shapes of pollen curves and evaluation of next-best solutions,” Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 1996, 124: 17-37, 21 pages. |
Pollack et al., “Automatic Well Log Correlation,” AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Apr. 3, 2017, 1 page, Abstract Only. |
Rudman and Lankston, “Stratigraphic Correlation of Well Logs by Computer Techniques,” The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Mar. 1973, 53:3 (557-588), 12 pages. |
Sakoe and Chiba, “Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ASSP-26:1, Feb. 1978, 7 pages. |
Salvador and Chan, “FastDTW: Toward Accurate Dynamic Time Warping in Linear Time and Space,” presented at the KDD Workshop on Mining Temporal and Sequential Data, Intelligent Data Analysis, Jan. 2004, 11:5 (70-80), 11 pages. |
Sayhi, “peakdet: Peak detection using MATLAB,” Jul. 2012, 4 pages. |
Scribd.com [online], “Milling Practices and Procedures,” retrieved from URL <https://www.scribd.com/document/358420338/Milling-Rev-2-Secured>, 80 pages. |
Silva and Koegh, “Prefix and Suffix Invariant Dynamic Time Warping,” IEEE Computer Society, presented at the IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining, 2016, 6 pages. |
Smith and Waterman, “New Stratigraphic Correlation Techniques,” Journal of Geology, 1980, 88: 451-457, 8 pages. |
Startzman and Kuo, “A Rule-Based System for Well Log Correlation,” SPE Formative Evaluation, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Sep. 1987, 9 pages. |
TAM International Inflatable and Swellable Packers, “TAM Scab Liner brochure,” Tam International, available on or before Nov. 15, 2016, 4 pages. |
Tomasi et al., “Correlation optimized warping and dynamic time warping as preprocessing methods for chromatographic data,” Journal of Chemometrics, 2004, 18: 231-241, 11 pages. |
Uchida et al., “Non-Markovian Dynamic Time Warping,” presented at the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Nov. 11-15, 2012, 4 pages. |
Waterman and Raymond, “The Match Game: New Stratigraphic Correlation Algorithms,” Mathematical Geology, 1987, 19:2, 19 pages. |
Weatherford, “Micro-Seal Isolation System-Bow (MSIS-B),” Weatherford Swellable Well Construction Products, Brochure, 2009-2011, 2 pages. |
Zoraster et al., “Curve Alignment for Well-to-Well Log Correlation,” SPE 90471, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 26-29, 2004, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/011583, dated Apr. 19, 2022, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220220829 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |