All of the material in this patent application is subject to copyright protection under the copyright laws of the United States and of other countries. As of the first effective filing date of the present application, this material is protected as unpublished material.
However, permission to copy this material is hereby granted to the extent that the copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentation or patent disclosure, as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention generally relates to oil and gas extraction. Specifically, the invention attempts to isolate fracture zones through selectively positioning restriction elements within a wellbore casing.
The process of extracting oil and gas typically consists of operations that include preparation, drilling, completion, production and abandonment.
Preparing a drilling site involves ensuring that it can be properly accessed and that the area where the rig and other equipment will be placed has been properly graded. Drilling pads and roads must be built and maintained which includes the spreading of stone on an impermeable liner to prevent impacts from any spills but also to allow any rain to drain properly.
In the drilling of oil and gas wells, a wellbore is formed using a drill bit that is urged downwardly at a lower end of a drill string. After drilling the wellbore is lined with a string of casing. An annular area is thus formed between the string of casing and the wellbore. A cementing operation is then conducted in order to fill the annular area with cement. The combination of cement and casing strengthens the wellbore and facilitates the isolation of certain areas of the formation behind the casing for the production of hydrocarbons.
The first step in completing a well is to create a connection between the final casing and the rock which is holding the oil and gas. There are various operations in which it may become necessary to isolate particular zones within the well. This is typically accomplished by temporarily plugging off the well casing at a given point or points with a plug.
A special tool, called a perforating gun, is lowered to the rock layer. This perforating gun is then fired, creating holes through the casing and the cement and into the targeted rock. These perforating holes connect the rock holding the oil and gas and the well bore.
Since these perforations are only a few inches long and are performed more than a mile underground, no activity is detectable on the surface. The perforation gun is then removed before for the next step, hydraulic fracturing. Stimulation fluid, which is a mixture of over 90% water and sand, plus a few chemical additives, is pumped under controlled conditions into deep, underground reservoir formations. The chemicals are used for lubrication and to keep bacteria from forming and to carry the sand. These chemicals are typically non-hazardous and range in concentrations from 0.1% to 0.5% by volume and are needed to help improve the performance and efficiency of the hydraulic fracturing. This stimulation fluid is pumped at high pressure out through the perforations made by the perforating gun. This process creates fractures in the shale rock which contains the oil and natural gas.
In many instances a single wellbore may traverse multiple hydrocarbon formations that are otherwise isolated from one another within the Earth. It is also frequently desired to treat such hydrocarbon bearing formations with pressurized treatment fluids prior to producing from those formations. In order to ensure that a proper treatment is performed on a desired formation, that formation is typically isolated during treatment from other formations traversed by the wellbore. To achieve sequential treatment of multiple formations, the casing adjacent to the toe of a horizontal, vertical, or deviated wellbore is first perforated while the other portions of the casing are left unperforated. The perforated zone is then treated by pumping fluid under pressure into that zone through perforations. Following treatment a plug is placed adjacent to the perforated zone. The process is repeated until all the zones are perforated. The plugs are particularly useful in accomplishing operations such as isolating perforations in one portion of a well from perforations in another portion or for isolating the bottom of a well from a wellhead. The purpose of the plug is to isolate some portion of the well from another portion of the well.
Subsequently, production of hydrocarbons from these zones requires that the sequentially set plugs be removed from the well. In order to reestablish flow past the existing plugs an operator must remove and/or destroy the plugs by milling, drilling, or dissolving the plugs.
As generally seen in the system diagram of
Furthermore, after well completions, sleeves used to set frac plugs may have a smaller inner diameter constricting fluid flow when well production is initiated. Therefore, there is a need for a relatively large inner diameter sleeves after well completion that allow for unrestricted well production fluid flow.
Additionally, frac plugs can be inadvertently set at undesired locations in the wellbore casing creating unwanted constrictions. The constrictions may latch wellbore tools that are run for future operations and cause unwanted removal process. Therefore, there is a need to prevent premature set conditions caused by conventional frac plugs.
As generally seen in the method of
The step (0206) requires that removal/milling equipment be run into the well on a conveyance string which may typically be wire line, coiled tubing or jointed pipe. The process of perforating and plug setting steps represent separate “trip” into and out of the wellbore with the required equipment. Each trip is time consuming and expensive. In addition, the process of drilling and milling the plugs creates debris that needs to be removed in another operation. Therefore, there is a need for isolating multiple hydraulic fracturing zones without the need for a milling operation. Furthermore, there is a need for positioning restrictive plug elements that could be removed in a feasible, economic, and timely manner before producing gas.
The prior art as detailed above suffers from the following deficiencies:
While some of the prior art may teach some solutions to several of these problems, the core issue of isolating hydraulic fracturing zones without the need for a milling operation has not been addressed by prior art.
Accordingly, the objectives of the present invention are (among others) to circumvent the deficiencies in the prior art and affect the following objectives:
While these objectives should not be understood to limit the teachings of the present invention, in general these objectives are achieved in part or in whole by the disclosed invention that is discussed in the following sections. One skilled in the art will no doubt be able to select aspects of the present invention as disclosed to affect any combination of the objectives described above.
The present invention in various embodiments addresses one or more of the above objectives in the following manner. The present invention provides a system to isolate fracture zones in a horizontal, vertical, or deviated wellbore without the need for a milling operation. The system includes a wellbore casing laterally drilled into a hydrocarbon formation, a setting tool that sets a large inner diameter (ID) restriction sleeve member (RSM), and a restriction plug element (RPE). A setting tool deployed on a wireline or coil tubing into the wellbore casing sets and seals the RSM at a desired wellbore location. The setting tool forms a conforming seating surface (CSS) in the RSM. The CSS is shaped to engage/receive RPE deployed into the wellbore casing. The engaged/seated RPE isolates toe ward and heel ward fluid communication of the RSM to create a fracture zone. The RPEs are removed or pumped out or left behind without the need for a milling operation. A large ID RSM diminishes flow constriction during oil production.
The present invention system may be utilized in the context of an overall gas extraction method, wherein the wellbore plug isolation system described previously is controlled by a method having the following steps:
Integration of this and other preferred exemplary embodiment methods in conjunction with a variety of preferred exemplary embodiment systems described herein in anticipation by the overall scope of the present invention.
For a fuller understanding of the advantages provided by the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings wherein:
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detailed preferred embodiment of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiment illustrated.
The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with particular reference to the presently preferred embodiment, wherein these innovative teachings are advantageously applied to the particular problems of a wellbore plug isolation system and method. However, it should be understood that this embodiment is only one example of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others.
The present invention may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
In a preferred exemplary embodiment, the WST may set RSM (0303) to the ICS in compression mode to form an inner profile on the RSM (0303). The inner profile could form a tight or leaky seal preventing substantial axial movement of the RSM (0303). In another preferred exemplary embodiment, the WST may set RSM (0303) to the ICS in expansion mode providing more contact surface for sealing RSM (0303) against ICS. Further details of setting RSM (0303) through compression and expansion modes are further described below in
In another preferred exemplary embodiment, the WST may set RSM (0303) using a gripping/sealing element disposed of therein with RSM (0303) to grip the outside surface of RSM (0303) to ICS. Further details of setting RSM (0303) through compression and expansion modes are described below in
In another preferred exemplary embodiment, the WST may set RSM (0303) at any desired location within wellbore casing (0304). The desired location may be selected based on information such as the preferred hydrocarbon formation area, fraction stage, and wellbore conditions. The desired location may be chosen to create uneven hydraulic fracturing stages. For example, a shorter hydraulic fracturing stage may comprise a single perforating position so that the RSM locations are selected close to each other to accommodate the perforating position. Similarly, a longer hydraulic fracturing stage may comprise multiple perforating positions so that the RSM locations are selected as far to each other to accommodate the multiple perforating positions. Shorter and longer hydraulic fracturing positions may be determined based on the specific information of hydrocarbon formation (0302). A mudlog analyzes the mud during drilling operations for hydrocarbon information at locations in the wellbore. Prevailing mudlog conditions may be monitored to dynamically change the desired location of RSM (0303).
The WST may create a conforming seating surface (CSS) (0306) within RSM (0303). The WST may form a beveled edge on the production end (heel end) of the RSM (0303) by constricting the inner diameter region of RSM (0303) to create the CSS (0306). The inner surface of the CSS (0306) could be formed such that it seats and retains a restriction plug element (RPE) (0305). The diameter of the RPE (0305) is chosen such that it is less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter of RSM (0303). The CSS (0306) and RPE (0305) may be complementary shaped such that RPE (0305) seats against CSS (0306). For example, RPE (0306) may be spherically shaped and the CSS (0306) may be beveled shaped to enable RPE (0305) to seat in CSS (0306) when a differential pressure is applied. The RPE (0305) may pressure lock against CSS (0306) when differential pressure is applied i.e., when the pressure upstream (production or heel end) of the RSM (0303) location is greater than the pressure downstream (injection or toe end) of the RSM (0303). The differential pressure established across the RSM (0303) locks RPE (0305) in place isolating downstream (injection or toe end) fluid communication. According to one preferred exemplary embodiment, RPE (0305) seated in CSS (0306) isolates a zone to enable hydraulic fracturing operations to be performed in the zone without affecting downstream (injection or toe end) hydraulic fracturing stages. The RPE (0305) may also be configured in other shapes such as a plug, dart or a cylinder. It should be noted that one skilled in the art would appreciate that any other shapes conforming to the seating surface may be used for RPEs to achieve similar isolation affect as described above.
According to another preferred exemplary embodiment, RPE (0305) may seat directly in RSM (0303) without the need for a CSS (0306). In this context, RPE (0305) may lock against the vertical edges of the RSM (0303) which may necessitate a larger diameter RPE (0305).
According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment, RPE (0305) may degrade over time in the well fluids eliminating the need to be removed before production. The RPE (0305) degradation may also be accelerated by acidic components of hydraulic fracturing fluids or wellbore fluids, thereby reducing the diameter of RPE (0305) enabling it to flow out (pumped out) of the wellbore casing or flow back (pumped back) to the surface before production phase commences.
In another preferred exemplary embodiment, RPE (0305) may be made of a metallic material, non-metallic material, a carbide material, or any other commercially available material.
The present invention may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
According to one aspect of a preferred exemplary embodiment, RSMs may be set by WST at desired locations to enable RPEs to create multiple hydraulic fracturing zones in the wellbore casing. The hydraulic fracturing zones may be equally spaced or unevenly spaced depending on wellbore conditions or hydrocarbon formation locations.
According to another preferred exemplary embodiment, RPEs are locked in place due to pressure differential established across RSMs. For example, RPE (0502) is locked in the seat of RSM (0512) due to a positive pressure differential established across RSM (0512) i.e., pressure upstream (hydraulic fracturing stages 0520, 0521 and stages towards heel of the wellbore casing) is greater than pressure downstream (hydraulic fracturing stages 0522, 0523 and stages towards toe of the wellbore casing).
According a further preferred exemplary embodiment, RPEs (0501, 0502, 0503) may degrade over time, flowed back by pumping, or flowed into the wellbore, after completion of all stages in the wellbore, eliminating the need for additional milling operations.
According a further preferred exemplary embodiment the RPE's may change shape or strength such that they may pass through a RSM in either the production (heel end) or injection direction (toe end). For example RPE (0512) may degrade and change shape such it may pass through RSM (0511) in the production direction or RSM (0513) in the injection direction. The RPEs may also be degraded such that they are in between the RSMs of current stage and a previous stage restricting fluid communication towards the injection end (toe end) but enabling fluid flow in the production direction (heel end). For example, RPE (0502) may degrade such it is seated against the injection end (toe end) of RSM (0511) that may have flow channels. Flow channels in the RSM are further described below in
According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment, inner diameters of RSMs (0511, 0512, 0513) may be the same and large enough to allow unrestricted fluid flow during well production operations. The RSMs (0511, 0512, 0513) may further degrade in well fluids to provide an even larger diameter comparable to the inner diameter of the well casing (0504) allowing enhanced fluid flow during well production. The degradation could be accelerated by acids in the hydraulic fracturing fluids.
It should be noted that some of the material and designs of the RPE described below may not be limited and should not be construed as a limitation. This basic RPE design and materials may be augmented with a variety of ancillary embodiments, including but not limited to:
As generally seen in the flow chart of
One preferred embodiment may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
The diameter of the RPE (0702) is chosen such that it is less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter of RSM (0703). The CSS (0704) and RPE (0702) may be complementary shaped such that RPE (0702) seats against CSS (0704). For example, RPE (0702) may be cylindrically shaped and CSS (0704) may be beveled shaped to enable RPE (0702) to seat in CSS (0704) when a differential pressure is applied. The RPE (0702) may pressure lock against CSS (0704) when differential pressure is applied.
It should be noted that, if a CSS is not present in the RSM (0703) or not formed by the WST, the cylindrical RPE (0702) may directly seat against the edges of the RSM (0703).
Yet another preferred embodiment may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
One preferred embodiment may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
Yet another preferred embodiment may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
Similarly,
As generally seen in the aforementioned flow chart of
As described above in steps (0601), (0602), and (0603)
A further preferred embodiment may be seen in more detail as generally illustrated in
According to yet another preferred embodiment, the RSMs may be designed with fingers on either end to facilitate milling operation, if needed. Toe end fingers (3302) and heel end fingers (3304) may be designed on the toe end and heel end the RSM (3306) respectively. In the context of a milling operation, the toe end fingers may be pushed towards the heel end fingers of the next RSM (toe ward) such that the fingers are intertwined and interlocked. Subsequently, all the RSMs may be interlocked with each other finally eventually mill out in one operation as compared to the current method of milling each RSM separately.
As generally illustrated in
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, a double set option is provided with a WST to seal one end of the RSM directly to the inner surface of the wellbore casing while the other end is sealed with a gripping element to prevent substantial axial and longitudinal movement.
As generally illustrated in
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the restricted sleeve member could still be configured with or without a CSS. The inner sleeve surface (ISS) of the RSM may be made of a polished bore receptacle (PBR). Instead of an independently pumped down RPE, however, a sealing device could be deployed on a wireline or as part of a tubular string. The sealing device could then seal with sealing elements within the restricted diameter of the internal sleeve surface (ISS), but not in the ICS surface. PBR surface within the ISS provides a distinct advantage of selectively sealing RSM at desired wellbore locations to perform treatment or re-treatment operations between the sealed locations, well production test, or test for casing integrity.
The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of extracting gas utilizing wellbore casings, but can be generalized as a wellbore isolation plug system comprising:
This general system summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design description.
The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a wellbore plug isolation method wherein the method is performed on a wellbore plug isolation system comprising:
This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design description.
The present invention anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of oil and gas extraction. The examples presented previously do not represent the entire scope of possible usages. They are meant to cite a few of the almost limitless possibilities.
This basic system and method may be augmented with a variety of ancillary embodiments, including but not limited to:
One skilled in the art will recognize that other embodiments are possible based on combinations of elements taught within the above invention description.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/830,896 filed Dec. 4, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/714,924 filed May 18, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,835,006 issued Dec. 5, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/713,873 filed May 15, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,243,472 issued Jan. 26, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/459,042 filed Aug. 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,062,543 issued Jun. 23, 2015, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2732195 | Ljungstrom | Jan 1956 | A |
2754910 | Derrick et al. | Jul 1956 | A |
2780450 | Ljungstrom | Feb 1957 | A |
2849070 | Maly | Aug 1958 | A |
2906123 | Vernet et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
2923535 | Ljungstrom | Feb 1960 | A |
3072189 | MacSporran | Jan 1963 | A |
3103973 | Mullen | Sep 1963 | A |
3208530 | Allen | Sep 1965 | A |
3832243 | Donkersloot et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4424865 | Payton, Jr. | Jan 1984 | A |
4515213 | Rogen et al. | May 1985 | A |
4681159 | Allwin et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5040283 | Pelgrom | Aug 1991 | A |
5070788 | Carisella et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5159145 | Carisella et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
6474414 | Gonzalez | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6828531 | Spencer | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6923263 | Eden | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942032 | La Rovere | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7258169 | Fripp | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7290609 | Wardlaw | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7350582 | McKeachnie et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7625846 | Cooke, Jr. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647964 | Akbar et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7735567 | O'Malley et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743825 | O'Malley et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7886825 | Van Hal | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8025104 | Cooke, Jr. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8178476 | Xie et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191644 | Rytlewski et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8215385 | Cooke, Jr. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8276670 | Patel | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8283174 | Van Hal | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8327931 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8342240 | Richard et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8439108 | Cooke, Jr. | May 2013 | B2 |
8485265 | Marya et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8622133 | Kaminsky | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8726991 | Boney | May 2014 | B2 |
8905147 | Fripp et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9062543 | Snider et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9068428 | Mazyar et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9080098 | Xu et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9243472 | Snider et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9382790 | Bertoja et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9506309 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20020060071 | Grundmann | May 2002 | A1 |
20020148617 | Dewey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030132224 | Spencer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030164237 | Butterfield, Jr. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040149443 | La Rovere | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163820 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040231845 | Cooke | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050109511 | Spencer | May 2005 | A1 |
20050211436 | Fripp | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060144591 | Gonzalez | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070034267 | Partridge | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070107908 | Vaidya et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169935 | Akbar et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225175 | Cooke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240885 | O'Malley et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080015120 | Cooke | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080066904 | Van hal | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080115932 | Cooke | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149345 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149351 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080210423 | Boney | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230219 | Kaminsky | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090101342 | Gaudette et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090200040 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090255686 | Richard et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100078173 | Buytaert et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100243242 | Boney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270031 | Patel | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100294507 | Tanton | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300675 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110036570 | La Rovere et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110132609 | Val Hal | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132611 | Rytlewski et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132621 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146985 | Xie et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110186306 | Marya et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110303423 | Kaminsky | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120181032 | Naedler et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120199349 | Theming et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120217021 | Cravatte et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120267101 | Cooke, Jr. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120276356 | Xu et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120318513 | Mazyer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000914 | Kelbie et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130032357 | Mazyer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130062063 | Baihly | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130087334 | Buytaert et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130087335 | Carragher | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130133876 | Naedler et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133897 | Baihly et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146302 | Gaudette et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130186616 | Xu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186650 | Xu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130206425 | Mazyar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130264056 | Stout | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270013 | Horsch | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284425 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299185 | Xu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130319669 | Dupree et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130327540 | Hamid et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130333890 | Dagenais et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140027128 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140060830 | Love | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140060837 | Love | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069636 | Kaminsky | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069637 | Kaminsky | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096950 | Pyecroft et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140151054 | Norrid | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140190685 | Frazier et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150008003 | Lafleur | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150060069 | Potapenko et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150159462 | Cutler | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160047194 | Snider et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047195 | Snider et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047196 | George et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047198 | Hardesty et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047199 | Hardesty et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160258242 | Hayter et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160356137 | Hardesty et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03048520 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2014039632 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014062200 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014098903 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 30, 2018, from copending U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,953. |
Final Office Action, dated May 3, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/721,874. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2018. |
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/031841 dated Aug. 5, 2015. |
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/043866 dated Dec. 22, 2015. |
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/043876 dated Jan. 4, 2016. |
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/043871 dated Jan. 4, 2016. |
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/043880 dated Jan. 7, 2016. |
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion dated Jul. 17, 2017 for European Application No. 15832132.3. |
ISA/US, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/025987 dated May 1, 2017. |
U.S. Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/830,896, dated Apr. 12, 2019. (With the exception of the references cited herein, the remaining reference cited in the Office Action is already of record.). |
Extended European Search Report for related European Application No. 18208152.1, dated Apr. 16, 2019. (With the exception of the references cited herein, the remaining references cited in the Extended European Search Report are already of record.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180171741 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15830896 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 15891781 | US | |
Parent | 14714924 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15830896 | US | |
Parent | 14713873 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 14714924 | US | |
Parent | 14459042 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14713873 | US |