In subsea or other underwater well drilling procedures an established practice is to run, land, and set casing hangers and annulus packoffs in a submerged wellhead housing by means of a running tool connected to a drill string or other pipe string. The hanger is run into the wellhead using the running tool until the hanger lands on a casing hanger shoulder in the wellhead or on a previously installed hanger. The packoff is then run in and set in the annulus between the hanger and the wellhead housing the hanger running tool to form a seal between the hanger and the wellhead. The hanger and packoff are each releasably connected to the running tool and the running tool is retrievable after the hanger and packoff have been set. However, once the running tool is retrieved, the hanger and/or the packoff may not be sufficiently restrained from above, even with an additional hanger later installed. Thus, there is the possibility that even a set packoff may travel within the wellhead and potentially compromise the integrity of the seal between the hanger and the wellhead.
For a more detailed description of the embodiments, reference will now be made to the following accompanying drawings:
In the drawings and description that follows, like parts are marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals, respectively. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features of the invention may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in the interest of clarity and conciseness. The present invention is susceptible to embodiments of different forms. Specific embodiments are described in detail and are shown in the drawings, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the invention, and is not intended to limit the invention to that illustrated and described herein. It is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results. Any use of any form of the terms “connect”, “engage”, “couple”, “attach”, or any other term describing an interaction between elements is not meant to limit the interaction to direct interaction between the elements and may also include indirect interaction between the elements described. The various characteristics mentioned above, as well as other features and characteristics described in more detail below, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the embodiments, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Opposite the portion threaded into the energizing ring 18, a catch ring 32 extends from an interior surface of the loading ring 22 into an annular groove 34 on the outside surface of the hold-down ring 24. Although the catch ring 32 is secured to the loading ring 22, the size of the groove 34 allows both vertical and rotational movement of the hold-down ring 24 relative to the loading ring 22. However, the catch ring 32 only allows a certain amount of vertical travel of the hold-down ring 24 relative to the loading ring 22 before the catch ring 32 engages an edge of the groove 34.
In addition to the catch ring 32, the loading ring 22 interacts with the hold-down ring 24 through a hold-down ring threaded connection 36. The direction of the threads of the hold-down ring threaded connection 36 may either be right-handed or left-handed. However, the threads of the hold-down ring threaded connection 36 are an opposite turn than the threads of the loading ring threaded connection 30. Thus, if the loading ring threaded connection 30 threads are right-hand threads, the hold-down ring threaded connection 36 will include left-hand threads and vice versa.
To set the loading shoulder 10, the running tool 38 rotates the energizing ring 18. Because of the tongue-and-groove engagement 44, both the hold-down ring 24 and the loading ring 22 resist being rotated with the energizing ring 18. Consequently, the energizing ring 18 rotates relative to the loading ring 22 and the hold-down ring 24. Because of the loading ring threaded connection 30, the rotation of the energizing ring 18 relative to the loading ring 22 draws the loading ring 22 further into the energizing ring 18. Doing so actuates the lock ring angled engagements 26, 28 to expand the lock ring 20 into engagement with the lock ring groove 42 in the wellhead 12 as shown in
Rotation of the energizing ring 18 relative to the loading ring 22 proceeds until either the loading ring threaded connection 30 bottoms out or the lock ring 20 becomes fully expanded into the wellhead lock ring groove 42. At such time, the loading ring 22 no longer rotates relative to the energizing ring 18 and begins to rotate with the energizing ring 18. However, the tongue-and groove arrangement 44 still restrains the hold-down ring 24 from rotating, thus producing relative rotation between the loading ring 22 and the hold-down ring 24 with the catch ring 32 rotating within the annular groove 34.
As previously mentioned, the threads of the hold-down ring threaded connection 36 turn in a different direction than the threads of the loading ring threaded connection 30. Thus, although the energizing ring 18 rotation direction draws the loading ring 22 further into the energizing ring 18, the same rotation direction expands the hold-down ring 24 out from the loading ring 22. Thus, rotation of the loading ring 22 as described expands the hold-down ring 24 out from the loading ring 22 to restrain movement of the casing hanger 14 as well as the packoff assembly 16 below.
As shown in
As shown in
The loading shoulder 10 may thus provide a positive lock in both the direction extending into the wellbore and the direction extending out of the wellbore to support an additional casing hanger 46 above as well as restrain the casing hanger 14 and packoff assembly 16 below.
While specific embodiments have been shown and described, modifications can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments as described are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications are possible and are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described, but is only limited by the claims that follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.
This application is a 35 U.S.C. §371 national stage application of PCT/US2009/038520 filed Mar. 27, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/040,328 filed Mar. 28, 2008, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/038520 | 3/27/2009 | WO | 00 | 6/16/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/120935 | 10/1/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3086590 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3299954 | Williams et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3382921 | Todd | May 1968 | A |
3404736 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3457992 | Brown | Jul 1969 | A |
3543847 | Haeber | Dec 1970 | A |
3561527 | Nelson | Feb 1971 | A |
4089377 | Chateau | May 1978 | A |
4139058 | Gano | Feb 1979 | A |
4167970 | Cowan | Sep 1979 | A |
4252187 | Wilson | Feb 1981 | A |
4298064 | Lawson | Nov 1981 | A |
4298067 | Lawson | Nov 1981 | A |
4333531 | Lawson | Jun 1982 | A |
4353420 | Miller | Oct 1982 | A |
4416472 | Fowler et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4460042 | Galle, Jr. | Jul 1984 | A |
4469172 | Clark | Sep 1984 | A |
4528738 | Galle, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4540053 | Baugh et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4550782 | Lawson | Nov 1985 | A |
4595063 | Jennings et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4615544 | Baugh | Oct 1986 | A |
4661016 | Baugh et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4773477 | Putch | Sep 1988 | A |
4815770 | Hyne et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4836579 | Wester et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4900041 | Hopkins et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911244 | Hynes | Mar 1990 | A |
4949786 | Eckert et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5020593 | Milberger | Jun 1991 | A |
5094297 | Bridges | Mar 1992 | A |
5110144 | Burton et al. | May 1992 | A |
5127478 | Miller | Jul 1992 | A |
5129660 | Taylor et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5174376 | Singeetham | Dec 1992 | A |
5209521 | Osborne | May 1993 | A |
5240076 | Cromar et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5255746 | Bridges | Oct 1993 | A |
5307879 | Kent | May 1994 | A |
5450905 | Brammer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5544707 | Hopper et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5620052 | Turner | Apr 1997 | A |
6003602 | Wilkins | Dec 1999 | A |
6234252 | Pallini et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6520263 | June | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536527 | Munk et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540024 | Pallini et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6715554 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7040412 | DeBerry | May 2006 | B2 |
7134490 | Nguyen | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7380607 | Thomas | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7500524 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7604058 | McGuire | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7861789 | Nelson | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7900706 | Ford | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020040782 | Rytlewski et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20050006107 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2009/038520 Search Report and Written Opinion, Nov. 6, 2009 ( 11 p.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110240307 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61040328 | Mar 2008 | US |