Wellhead housing seal assembly with backup feature

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6409176
  • Patent Number
    6,409,176
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 5, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A tubular connection, an example of which is a subsea wellhead having a primary and secondary seal areas allows the use of a backup or contingency gasket for engagement with the secondary seal area in the wellhead should a failure occur in the primary seal area. In the preferred embodiment, the primary and secondary seal areas are sufficiently separated such that the erosion damage which occurs from leakage with the original gasket adjacent the primary seal area, which can spread below the primary seal area, leaves the secondary seal area unaffected. A backup or contingency gasket can be inserted for sealable contact with the secondary sealing area for further well operations.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The field of this invention relates in general to tubular joints, particularly subsea wellhead housings and wellhead connectors, and in particular to a seal assembly that provides sealing if the wellhead housing conical sealing surface becomes damaged.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




A subsea well has a wellhead housing located at the subsea floor. The wellhead housing is a tubular member having a bore. A wellhead connector is lowered from a vessel at the surface over the wellhead housing to connect the subsea well to the surface. The wellhead connector has a connection for connecting to the exterior of the wellhead housing. Thus, a wellhead is one specific type of a tubular joint which is often used in the oilfield.




The wellhead housing has an upward-facing shoulder on its upper end that is engaged by a downward-facing shoulder on the lower end of the wellhead connector. The wellhead housing has a conical upward-facing shoulder at its upper end. The wellhead connector has a conical downward-facing shoulder. The wellhead connector also has a recess located radially inward from the downward-facing shoulder.




A metal seal locates between the wellhead connector and the wellhead housing. The metal seal has a conical upper surface that seals against the conical surface of the wellhead connector. The metal seal has a lower conical surface that seals against the conical surface of the wellhead housing. A rib extends radially outward from the two conical surfaces for location in the recess.




While the metal seal works well, if the conical surface of the wellhead housing becomes damaged, problems occur. The metal seal will not seal against the damaged lower surface. The wellhead housing is cemented in the ground and connected to casing and conductor pipe. It is not possible to pull the wellhead housing from the subsea floor for redressing the conical sealing surface.




A prior design for addressing this problem are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,103,915. In this design, the subsea wellhead housing has a secondary sealing surface machined below its conical primary sealing surface during manufacturing. The secondary sealing surface extends downward and is of a greater diameter than the bore. A conventional metal seal locates between the wellhead housing and the wellhead connector. The conventional seal seals against the primary sealing surface of the wellhead housing. The secondary sealing surface is not used so long as the wellhead housing primary sealing surface is in good condition. If the wellhead housing primary sealing surface becomes damaged, then a second seal ring is utilized in lieu of the first seal ring. The second seal ring has a support surface that leads to a secondary surface. The secondary surface is cylindrical and is sized to seal against the secondary surface in the wellhead housing. The support surface on the second seal ring is sized so that it will be spaced by a slight gap from the damaged primary sealing surface of the wellhead housing. This prior art device claims that a good seal between the wellhead housing and the wellhead connector can be maintained without need to redress the wellhead housing primary sealing surface. In another embodiment, the secondary seal surface is disclosed as being conical rather than cylindrical and at a lesser angle relative to vertical than the primary sealing surface. This configuration provides for a primary conical sealing surface at one angle, leading into a secondary conical sealing surface at another angle.




The different configurations of the design just described are illustrated in

FIGS. 2 and 4

of U.S. Pat. No. 5,103,915. The main problem with this design is that the primary sealing surface, when it fails, is usually eroded due to the velocity effects of leaking fluid. These erosive effects attack not only the primary sealing surface but also the adjacent secondary sealing surface which, looking in the direction of the leaking fluid, presents itself first so that the erosive effects wind up damaging not only the primary but the secondary sealing surfaces in the wellhead. Thus, in effect, the design depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 5,103,915 is not serviceable, even with a replacement gasket, since the secondary surface has irregularities from the erosive effects and can no longer create a seal with the gasket against the connector. This phenomenon is illustrated in

FIGS. 1-3

of the present application which depict a prior design akin to that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,103,915. Referring to

FIG. 1

of this application, the wellhead


10


is shown having a single sealing surface


12


, which is tapered. Gasket


14


has a matching taper


16


so that it can be squeezed against the sealing surface


12


by the connector


18


. A clamp, generally referred to as


20


and which is of a known design, secures the wellhead


10


to the connector


18


and at the same time, forcing the connector


18


down against the gasket


14


to press the tapered surface


16


of the gasket


14


hard against the sealing surface


12


on the wellhead. In this design, the internal pressure in bore


22


can over time develop a leakpath which begins adjacent the lower end


24


of the gasket


14


in the transition area between bore


22


and tapered surface


16


. As fluid under pressure begins to escape past the gasket


14


, it begins to erode away part of the tapered sealing surface


12


and, in the configuration of

FIG. 1

, portions of the wall defining bore


22


.




An alternative known prior art design is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,103,915 and shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

of this application. In

FIG. 2

, the original gasket


26


is shown with its tapered surface


28


firmly against the tapered sealing surface


30


on the wellhead


32


. As before, the connector


34


is clamped by clamp


36


to hold tapered surface


28


against the sealing surface


30


of wellhead


32


. Sealing surface


30


is set to be the primary sealing surface, while an adjacent surface


38


, which can be cylindrical or tapered, extends immediately below the primary sealing surface


30


. During normal operations with an effective seal being formed between surfaces


28


and


30


, the gasket


26


is not in contact with the secondary sealing surface


38


. The intention of this design is to make use of secondary sealing surface


38


should leakage occur past sealing surface


30


. The problem occurs when erosion damage,


20


which is shown in

FIG. 3

, begins near the lower end


40


of the primary sealing surface


30


. As indicated by the cross-hatched area


42


in

FIG. 3

, the erosive effects spread to a significant portion of the secondary sealing surface


38


. Thus, when an oversized replacement gasket, which extends further downwardly with the intent of sealing against the secondary surface


38


is installed in the wellhead


32


, the result is unsatisfactory as the hoped for sealing surface


38


has been damaged by the fluid velocity leaking past gasket


26


at surface


30


. Thus, the problem with the design shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

of this application is that the secondary sealing surface


38


is configured so that it is in harm's way when the erosive effects of a leak begin. It, therefore, is not available as a smooth surface necessary to get reliable sealing with a replacement gasket made to bridge the damaged primary sealing surface


30


and further designed to seal up against the secondary sealing surface


38


which, at this time, is not serviceable.




Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to configure a tubular connection, one example of which could be a wellhead, internally, so that in the event leakage past a gasket occurs, the secondary sealing surface is available for use in a serviceable condition, thereby allowing the leak to be repaired, despite the damage to the primary sealing area. By virtue of the proper configuration between the secondary and primary sealing surfaces, the configuration of the present invention allows for reliable use of a secondary or backup sealing surface in conjunction with a backup or contingency gasket configured to reach the secondary sealing surface. The conforming shape of the contingency gasket to the wellhead configuration is also one of the novel inventions disclosed.




Other related wellhead designs of the prior art are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,687,794; 5,039,140; 4,709,933; 4,563,025; 4,474,381; 4,214,763; 3,749,426; 3,556,568; and 3,507,506.




Those skilled in the art will better appreciate the scope of the present invention from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment below.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A tubular connection, an example of which is a subsea wellhead having a primary and secondary seal areas allows the use of a backup or contingency gasket for engagement with the secondary seal area in the wellhead should a failure occur in the primary seal area. In the preferred embodiment, the primary and secondary seal areas are sufficiently separated such that the erosion damage which occurs from leakage with the original gasket adjacent the primary seal area, which can spread below the primary seal area, leaves the secondary seal area unaffected. A backup or contingency gasket can be inserted for sealable contact with the secondary sealing area for further well operations.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a sectional elevational view of a prior art design, indicating a primary seal area in the wellhead with no secondary seal area.





FIG. 2

a sectional elevational view of an alternative prior art design, showing the use of adjacent primary and secondary seal areas operating with the original gasket.





FIG. 3

is the view of

FIG. 2

, showing the erosive effects of a leak and damage to the secondary seal area.





FIG. 4

is a sectional elevational view of the present invention, using a wellhead as the preferred embodiment, illustrating the juxtaposition of the primary and secondary seal areas, with the original gasket installed.





FIG. 5

is the view of

FIG. 4

, showing that erosion due to a leak has eradicated the primary sealing area and has spread to the transition zone between the primary and secondary sealing areas.





FIG. 6

is the view of

FIG. 5

, showing the backup or contingency gasket installed and sealingly disposed against the secondary sealing area which is unaffected by the erosion damage.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring to

FIG. 4

, the wellhead


44


has a primary sealing surface


46


which is tapered with respect to the longitudinal axis


48


of bore


50


, a portion of which is shown in FIG.


4


. The connector


52


is mounted above the wellhead


44


and secures the initial gasket


54


to the wellhead


44


. Gasket


54


has a tapered surface


56


which conforms to the primary sealing surface


46


to an area just above transition surface


58


. Located below transition surface


58


is tapered secondary sealing surface


60


. Arrow


62


illustrates how a leakpath begins between primary sealing surface


46


and the conforming tapered surface


56


on gasket


54


. As seen in

FIG. 5

, hatched area


64


illustrates the ravages of erosion as the metal disappears due to high velocity fluid flow past the primary sealing surface


46


. The band of material lost expands at its lower end to encompass a significant portion of the transition surface


58


. However, as shown in

FIG. 5

, the tapered secondary sealing surface


60


is unaffected. As further shown in

FIG. 6

, a contingency gasket


54


′ can be inserted between the wellhead


44


and the connector


52


, which is longer than the original gasket


54


such that it contains tapered surfaces


56


′ and


66


, of which surface


66


conforms to the secondary tapered sealing surface


60


. In between is surface


65


, which can be radial or sloped and preferably is parallel to surface


58


on the wellhead


44


or the tubular connection on which the invention is used. Thus, the contingency gasket


54


′ has two sealing surfaces


56


′ and


66


, separated longitudinally by a transition surface


65


. If the surface


58


is still intact, then gasket surface


65


has an opportunity to seal against it in conjunction with gasket surface


66


on surface


60


. The gasket


54


′ can have a mirror image of surfaces


56


,


66


and


65


at an opposite end, in the preferred embodiment, to allow for a similar sealing effect to, for example, a connector


52


.




In the preferred embodiment, the transition surface


58


is cylindrical, but it can have a slight taper and still be within the scope of the invention.




It is the positioning of the secondary sealing surface


60


out of the flowpath of the fast-moving fluid which is escaping through a leak between primary sealing surface


46


and tapered surface


56


of gasket


54


which, in part, protects the secondary sealing surface


60


from the erosive effects of the fastmoving fluid. That physical juxtaposition, coupled with the separation of the primary sealing surface


46


from the secondary sealing surface


60


, ensures that, even in the event of failure of the primary seal at surface


46


, erosion will not damage the secondary sealing surface


60


so that the contingency gasket


54


′ can be installed with the knowledge that it will perfect the seal between the wellhead


44


and the connector


52


.




Recent developments in the oilfield have dictated that the seal between the wellhead


44


and connector


52


be of metallic construction as opposed to being a resilient seal. One of the reasons for this requirement is that some wells operate at temperatures in excess of 350° F. and at pressures in excess of 12,000 psi. In these conditions, well operators require metal seals. In view of this, many solutions used in the past to repair leaks between the wellhead


44


and the connector


52


, which involve resilient seals, cannot be used in these operating conditions.




The interface between the gasket and the sealing area can be damaged in several ways. One way is debris that lands on the sealing area whereupon the connector


52


is locked down on the wellhead


44


through a connection of known design, thus impregnating the sealing surface with debris or leaving a multitude of small dents in the sealing surface. This manifests itself as a slight leak in the first BOP test and has generally in the past been fixed with the use of a resilient gasket between the wellhead


44


and connector


52


. Erosion damage of the sealing surface caused by extended flow through a minor leakpath can also damage the sealing surface severely and can erode through the entire hub area of the wellhead


44


. When this occurs, a resilient gasket has not been effective to solve the problem. Instead, a bore seal and spacer spool are run into the bore


50


of the wellhead


44


to provide a replacement sealing area for the gasket between the wellhead


44


and the connector


52


.




If damage to the primary sealing area, which can be caused by debris or remote-operated vehicle impact or improper wellhead handling, is noticed on the rig, it can be buffed out or the actual wellhead housing replaced. On the other hand, if such a problem is discovered subsea, a resilient seal gasket has been used in the past with some success. It should be noted that the gaskets themselves, if not properly designed, or if the connector


52


is not properly locked to the wellhead


44


, or if for some reason the primary sealing surface has been mechanically altered, conditions supporting a leak will be present. In view of the temperature and pressure requirements of well operators and the need to use metal-to-metal seals in those conditions, many of the solutions tried in the past can no longer be used in most installations. It thus becomes more important to be able to configure the sealing areas, both primary


46


and secondary


60


, in a configuration where the secondary sealing area will not be damaged due to erosive effects of a leak of the primary sealing area


46


.




It should be noted that the configuration shown in

FIGS. 4-6

does not require a reduction in the bore size of bore


50


, which would be undesirable. Instead, the pressure rating of the wellhead


44


is retained and the secondary sealing area


60


is spaced apart from the primary sealing area


46


and set back so that erosion damage due to a leak, as shown in

FIG. 5

, will at most damage only the transition area


58


between the primary sealing area


46


and the secondary sealing area


60


. The secondary sealing area


60


can be tapered or cylindrical and the taper angle can be less than, equal to, or greater than the taper angle for the primary sealing area


46


. Transition area


58


can be cylindrical or tapered. The three distinct areas


46


,


58


, and


60


can all be tapered, with the transitional area


58


having a different taper angle than area


46


. This difference sets back area


60


from exposure to harmful erosive effects of high-velocity fluids if a leak occurs at area


46


. The further away that area


60


is placed from area


46


, the less likely is area


60


to be damaged by erosion. Stated differently, the longer the separation distance as measured in the longitudinal direction between areas


46


and


60


within limits of the contingency gasket


54


′ to reach surface


60


and seal effectively, the less likely is surface


60


to be damaged.




The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof, and various changes in the size, shape and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated construction, may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. In combination, a tubular connection, capable of accepting different gaskets for primary and secondary sealing, when connecting a first and second members, and at lest one gasket comprising:a first and second member connectable to each other wherein at least one of said members further comprises a tubular body having a bore along its longitudinal axis and a primary sealing surface and a secondary sealing surface separated by a transition surface, wherein all said surfaces circumscribe said bore; a secondary gasket usable to seal said first and second members against said secondary sealing surface after said primary sealing surface is no longer functional for effective sealing and mutually exclusive of the primary seal; a receptacle defined between the members when assembled to each other; and an extending member extending from said gasket and loosely mounted in said receptacle solely to locate said secondary gasket to allow said secondary gasket to make sealing contact with said secondary sealing surface.
  • 2. The connection of claim 1, further comprising:an initial gasket mountable at least over said primary sealing surface while leaving said secondary sealing surface exposed to said bore for initial operation of said connection.
  • 3. The connection of claim 2, wherein:said transition surface extends in a generally longitudinal direction for a distance which protects said secondary sealing surface from erosion due to leakage past said initial gasket.
  • 4. The connection of claim 3, wherein:said transition surface is substantially cylindrical with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 5. The connection of claim 3, wherein:said transition surface is tapered with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 6. The connection of claim 3, wherein:said primary sealing surface is tapered with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 7. The connection of claim 6, wherein:said transition surface is tapered with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 8. The connection of claim 7, wherein:said taper of said transition surface is at a different angle than said primary sealing surface.
  • 9. The connection of claim 3, wherein:said secondary sealing surface is tapered with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 10. The connection of claim 9, wherein:said transition surface is substantially cylindrical with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 11. The connection of claim 10, wherein:said primary sealing surface is tapered with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 12. The connection of claim 11, wherein:said taper of said primary sealing surface is at a different angle than said taper of said secondary sealing surface.
  • 13. The connection of claim 11, wherein:said taper of said primary sealing surface is at substantially the same angle as said taper of said secondary sealing surface.
  • 14. The connection of claim 9, further comprising:said secondary gasket mounted in place of said initial gasket, said secondary gasket having an annular shape and defining three distinct surfaces substantially parallel to said primary, transition, and secondary surfaces of said tubular body; said tubular body comprises a sub-sea wellhead and said second member of said connection comprises a wellhead connector.
  • 15. The connection of claim 3, wherein:said secondary sealing surface is substantially cylindrical with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 16. The connection of claim 3, further comprising:said secondary gasket mounted in place of said initial gasket, said secondary gasket engaging at least said secondary sealing surface while spanning over said primary sealing and said transition surface.
  • 17. The connection of claim 16, further comprising:said secondary gasket contacts said transition and said secondary sealing surfaces.
  • 18. The connection of claim 17, wherein:said primary sealing surface is tapered with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 19. The connection of claim 18, wherein:said transition surface is substantially cylindrical with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 20. The connection of claim 19, wherein:said taper of said primary sealing surface is at substantially the same angle as said taper of said secondary sealing surface.
  • 21. In combination, a gasket and a tubular connection comprising a first and second tubular wherein at least one of the tubulars has a primary and secondary sealing surfaces and a transition surface between them, said gasket comprising:an annular shape defining a bore there-through having longitudinal axis and an upper and lower end; said shape further comprising a sealing surface adjacent to at least one of said upper and lower ends and positioned to engage said secondary sealing surface after said primary sealing surface is no longer functional for effective sealing and the gasket does not engage the transition surface: and said shape further comprising an extending member which is loosely retained between said tubulars, when assembled, said extending member serving solely for location of said shape when said tubulars are assembled together.
  • 22. The gasket of claim 21, wherein:said shape further comprises a first and second sealing surfaces adjacent at least one of said upper and lower ends, said sealing surfaces separated longitudinally from each other by a transition surface: said sealing surfaces on said annular shape are disposed transversly to said longitudinal axis.
  • 23. The gasket of claim 22, wherein:said transition surface on said annular shape is disposed substantially parallel to said longitudinal axis.
  • 24. The gasket of claim 22, wherein:said transition surface on said annular shape is disposed transverse to said longitudinal axis.
  • 25. The gasket of claim 22, wherein:said sealing surfaces on said annular shape are at substantially the same angle with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 26. The gasket of claim 22, wherein:said sealing surfaces on said annular shape are at different angles with respect to said longitudinal axis.
  • 27. The gasket of claim 21, wherein:said shape further comprising a first and second sealing surfaces adjacent at least one of said upper and lower ends, said sealing surfaces separated longitudinally from each other by a transition surface; said surfaces on said annular shape conform to the sealing and transition surfaces of at least one of the tubulars.
  • 28. The gasket of claim 27, wherein:said shape further comprising a first and second sealing surfaces adjacent both said upper and lower ends, said pairs of first and second sealing surfaces each separated longitudinally from each other by a transition surface.
  • 29. The gasket of claim 27, wherein:said transition surface on said annular shape engageable to its conforming surface on one of said tubulars for sealing therewith.
  • 30. The gasket of claim 27, wherein:said second sealing surface engageable to its conforming surface on one of said tubulars for sealing therewith, even if erosion has destroyed the integrity of sealing surfaces on one of the tubulars that conform to said first and transition surfaces on said annular shape.
  • 31. The gasket of claim 21, wherein:said shape further comprising a first and second sealing surfaces adjacent at least one of said upper and lower ends, said sealing surfaces separated longitudinally from each other by a transition surface; said transition surface on said annular shape is disposed transverse to said longitudinal axis.
US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
3507506 Tillman, III Apr 1970 A
3556568 King Jan 1971 A
3749426 Tillman, III Jul 1973 A
4214763 Latham Jul 1980 A
4474381 Wilkins et al. Oct 1984 A
4563025 Poe Jan 1986 A
4709933 Adamek et al. Dec 1987 A
5103915 Sweeney et al. Apr 1992 A
5687794 Watkins et al. Nov 1997 A
6007111 Wafer Dec 1999 A