The present invention relates to wellhead equipment, and to a wellhead tool for isolating wellhead equipment from the extreme pressures and abrasive materials used in oil and gas well stimulation and to a method of using the same.
Oil and gas wells often require remedial actions in order to enhance production of hydrocarbons from the producing zones of subterranean formations. These actions include a process called fracturing whereby fluids are pumped into the formation at high pressures in order to break up the product bearing zone. This is done to increase the flow of the product to the well bore where it is collected and retrieved. Abrasive materials, such as sand or bauxite, called propates are also pumped into the fractures created in the formation to prop the fractures open allowing an increase in product flow. These procedures are a normal part of placing a new well into production and are common in older wells as the formation near the well bore begins to dry up. These procedures may also be required in older wells that tend to collapse in the subterranean zone as product is depleted in order to maintain open flow paths to the well bore.
The surface wellhead equipment is usually rated to handle the anticipated pressures that might be produced by the well when it first enters production. However, the pressures encountered during the fracturing process are normally considerably higher than those of the producing well. For the sake of economy, it is desirable to have equipment on the well rated for the normal pressures to be encountered. In order to safely fracture the well then, a means must be provided whereby the elevated pressures are safely contained and means must also be provided to control the well pressures. It is common in the industry to accomplish these requirements by using a ‘stinger’ that is rated for the pressures to be encountered. The ‘stinger’ reaches through the wellhead and into the tubing or casing through which the fracturing process is to be communicated to the producing subterranean zone. The ‘stinger’ also commonly extends through a blow out preventer (BOP) that has been placed on the top of the wellhead to control well pressures. Therefore, the ‘stinger’, by its nature, has a reduced bore which typically restricts the flow into the well during the fracturing process. Additionally, the placement of the BOP on the wellhead requires substantial ancillary equipment due to its size and weight.
It would, therefore, be desirable to have a product which does not restrict the flow into a well during fracturing and a method of fracturing whereby fracturing may be safely performed, the wellhead equipment can be protected from excessive pressures and abrasives and the unwieldy BOP equipment can be eliminated without requiring the expense of upgrading the pressure rating of the wellhead equipment. It would also be desirable to maintain an upper profile within the wellhead that would allow the use of standard equipment for the suspension of production tubulars upon final completion of the well.
In one exemplary embodiment, a wellhead assembly is provided including a first tubular member, a hanger mounted within the first tubular member and an annular member coupled to the outer surface of the hanger. The assembly also includes a second tubular member mounted to the annular member and surrounding a portion of the hanger. The assembly may also include studs extending from the annular member. The second tubular member may include a flange that is penetrated by the studs. In an exemplary embodiment assembly a seal if formed between the hanger and the second tubular member. In another exemplary embodiment, a wear sleeve may be fitted within a central opening extending through the hanger. The assembly may also have another flange spaced apart from the flange penetrated by the studs providing a surface for mounting wellhead equipment. In an exemplary embodiment the first tubular member is a casing head, the annular member is a collar nut and the second annular member is isolation tool.
In another exemplary embodiment a method for fracturing a well is provided requiring coupling a tubing mandrel hanger to a casing, the hanger having a central bore, threading an annular nut having studs extending there from on threads formed on the outer surface of the hanger, and mounting a tubular member having a flange over the hanger such that the studs penetrate openings formed through the flange. The method also requires coupling nuts to the studs penetrating the openings formed though the flange and applying fluids though the bore formed though the hanger for fracturing the well. The method may also include forming a seal between the tubular member and the hanger. Moreover the method may require installing a wear sleeve within the bore.
In another exemplary embodiment, the method further requires removing the tubular member from the hanger, removing the annular member from the hanger, removing the wear sleeve if installed, and threading a second tubular member on said threads on the outer surface of the hanger. The method may also require forming a seal between the second tubular member and the hanger. The second tubular member may be a tubing head.
In another exemplary embodiment, a method for fracturing a well is provided requiring coupling a tubing mandrel hanger to a casing, the hanger having a central bore, coupling an annular nut on a portion of the outer surface of the hanger, mounting a tubular member having a flange over the hanger and on the flange, and applying fluids though the bore formed though the hanger for fracturing the well. The method may also include forming a seal between the tubular member and the hanger.
Furthermore, the method may require removing the tubular member from the hanger, removing the annular member from the hanger, and mounting a second tubular member on said portion of the outer surface of the hanger. The method may also include forming a seal between the second tubular member and the hanger.
Referring now to the drawings and, particularly, to
It should be noted that the terms “upper,” “lower,” “upward,” and “downward” as used herein are relative terms for designating the relative position of elements. In other words, an assembly of the present invention may be formed upside down such that the “lower” elements are located higher than the “upper” elements.
The tubing head assembly 20 includes a body member referred to herein as the “tubing head” 22. The upper end 14 of casing head 13 cooperates with a lower end 24 of body member 22 whether by a flanged connection as shown or by other means. A production casing 18 is suspended within the well bore 15 by hanger 16. The upper end of production casing 18 extends into the body member and cooperates with the lower bore preparation 28 of body member 22. The juncture of production casing 18 and lower bore preparation 28 is sealed by seals 32. The seals 32 which may be standard or specially molded seals. In an exemplary embodiment, the seals are self energizing seals such as for example O-ring, T-seal or S-seal types of seals. Self-energizing seals do not need excessive mechanical forces for forming a seal.
Grooves 33 may be formed on the inner surface 35 of the body member 22 to accommodate the seals 32, as shown in
It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that the production casing 18 may also be threadedly suspended within the casing head 13 by what is known in the art as an extended neck mandrel hanger (not shown) whereby the extended neck of said mandrel hanger cooperates with the lower cylindrical bore preparation 28 of body member 22 in same manner as the upper end of production casing 18 and whose juncture with lower cylindrical bore preparation 28 of body member 22 is sealed in the same manner as previously described.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Now referring to
With the lock screw retracted, an exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tool 60 is installed through cylindrical bore 92 in secondary flange 70 and into the body member 22. The exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tool shown in
A radial flange 208 extends from an upper end of the wellhead isolation tool and provides an interface for connecting the upper assembly or fracturing tree 80 as shown in
The outer surface 210 of the well head isolation tool has an upper tapering portion 54 tapering from a larger diameter upper portion 218 to a smaller diameter lower portion 222. A lower tapering portion 220 extends below the upper tapering portion 54, tapering the outer surface of the wellhead isolation tool to a smaller diameter lower portion 222.
When the wellhead isolation tool is fitted into the body member through the secondary flange 70, the upper outer surface tapering portion 54 of the wellhead isolation tool mates with a complementary tapering inner surface portion 52 of the body member 22 as shown in
Now referring to
Now referring to
Cylindrical bores 34, 36 and 86 defined through the production casing 18, the exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tool 60, and through an annular lip portion 87 the body member 22, respectively, are in an exemplary embodiment as shown in
Referring again to
Now referring to
Now referring to
As with the embodiment shown in
Referring again to
While the wellhead isolation tool has been described with having an upper tapering portion 54 formed on its outer surface which mates with a complementary tapering inner surface 52 of the body member 22, an alternate exemplary embodiment of the wellhead isolation tool does not have a tapering outer surface mating with the tapering inner surface portion 52 of the body member. With the alternate exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tool, as for example shown in
With any of the aforementioned embodiments, the diameter of the tubing head inner surface 291 (shown in
A further exemplary embodiment, assembly 300 comprising a further exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tool or frac mandrel 302, includes a lower housing assembly 10 also referred to herein as a casing head assembly, an upper assembly 80 also referred to herein as a fracturing tree, and intermediate body assembly 20 also referred to herein as a tubing head assembly, and the intermediate wellhead isolation tool 302 also referred to herein as a frac mandrel, as shown in
The mandrel casing hanger 306 has a second cylindrical outer surface 320 extending above the first cylindrical outer surface 312 having a diameter smaller than the diameter of the first cylindrical outer surface. A third cylindrical outer surface 322 extends from the second cylindrical outer surface and has a diameter slightly smaller than the outer surface diameter of the second cylindrical outer surface. External threads 324 may be formed on the outer surface of the third cylindrical surface of the mandrel casing hanger. An outer annular groove 326 is formed at the juncture between the first and second cylindrical outer surfaces of the mandrel casing hanger. Internal threads 328 are formed at the upper end of the inner surface of the casing head. An annular groove 330 is formed in the inner surface of the mandrel casing head.
The inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger has three major sections. A first inner surface section 332 at the lower end which may be a tapering surface, as for example shown in
Body member 350, also known as a tubing head of the tubing head assembly 20, has a lower cylindrical portion 352 having an outer surface which in the exemplary embodiment threadedly cooperates with inner surface 354 of the third inner surface section of the mandrel casing hanger. A protrusion 356 is defined in an upper end of the lower cylindrical section of the body member 350 for mating with the counterbore 343 formed at the upper end of the third inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger. The body member 350 has an upper flange 360 and ports 362. The inner surface of the body member is a generally cylindrical and includes a first section 363 extending to the lower end of the body member. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The wellhead isolation tool has a first external flange 370 for mating with the flange 360 of the body member of the tubing head assembly. A second flange 372 is formed at the upper end of the wellhead isolation tool for mating with the upper assembly 80. A generally cylindrical section extends below the first flange 370 of the wellhead isolation tool. The generally cylindrical section has a first lower section 374 having an outer surface diameter equal or slightly smaller than the inner surface diameter of the first inner surface section of the body member of the tubing head assembly. A second section 376 of the wellhead isolation tool cylindrical section extending above the first lower section 374 has an outer surface diameter slightly smaller than the inner surface diameter of the second section 365 of the body member 350 and greater than the outer surface diameter of the first lower section 374. Consequently, an annular shoulder 371 is defined between the two outer surface sections of the wellhead isolation tool cylindrical section. The well head isolation tool is fitted within the cylindrical opening of the body member of the tubing head assembly such that the flange 370 of the wellhead isolation tool mates with the flange 360 of the body member 350. When that occurs, the annular shoulder 371 defined between the two outer surface sections of the cylindrical section of the wellhead isolation tool mates with the portion of the first section inner surface 363 of the body member 350.
Prior to installing the mandrel casing hanger into the casing head, a spring loaded latch ring 380 is fitted in the outer groove 326 of the mandrel casing hanger. The spring loaded latch ring has a generally upside down “T” shape in cross section comprising a vertical portion 382 and a first horizontal portion 384 for sliding into the outer annular groove 326 formed on the mandrel casing hanger. A second horizontal portion 386 extends from the other side of the vertical portion opposite the first horizontal portion.
The spring loaded latch ring is mounted on the mandrel casing hanger such that its first horizontal portion 384 is fitted into the external groove 326 formed in the mandrel casing hanger. The spring loaded latch ring biases against the outer surface of the mandrel casing hanger. When fitted into the external annular groove 326 formed in the mandrel casing hanger, the outer most surface of the second horizontal portion 386 of the latch ring has a diameter no greater than the diameter of the first outer surface section 312 of the mandrel casing hanger. In this regard, the mandrel casing hanger with the spring loaded latch ring can be slipped into the casing head so that the tapering outer surface 310 of the mandrel casing hanger can sit on the tapering inner surface portion 308 of the casing head.
In the exemplary embodiment, once the mandrel casing hanger is seated onto the casing head, the body member 350 of the tubing head assembly is fitted within the casing head such that the lower section of the outer surface of the body member threads on the third section inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger such that the protrusion 356 formed on the outer surface of the body member is mated within the counterbore 343 formed on the upper end of the third section inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger. The wellhead isolation tool is then fitted with its cylindrical section within the body member 350 such that the flange 370 of the wellhead isolation tool mates with the flange 360 of the body member. When this occurs, the annular shoulder 371 formed on the cylindrical section of the wellhead isolation tool mates with the first section 363 of the inner surface of the body member 350. Similarly, the lower outer surface section of the cylindrical section of the wellhead isolation tool mates with the inner surface second section 334 of the mandrel casing hanger. Seals 388 are provided in grooves formed 390 on the outer surface of the lower section of the cylindrical section of the wellhead isolation tool to mate with the second section inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger. In the alternative, the seals may be positioned in grooves formed on the second section inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger. In the exemplary embodiment, the seals are self-energizing seals, as for example, O-ring, T-seal or S-seal type seals.
A top nut 392 is fitted between the mandrel casing hanger upper end portion and the upper end of the casing head. More specifically, the top nut has a generally cylindrical inner surface section having a first diameter portion 394 above which extends a second portion 396 having a diameter greater than the diameter of the first portion. The outer surface 398 of the top nut has four sections. A first section 400 extending from the lower end of the top nut having a first diameter. A second section 402 extending above the first section having a second diameter greater than the first diameter. A third section 404 extending from the second section having a third diameter greater than the second diameter. And a fourth section 406 extending from the third section having a fourth diameter greater than the third diameter and greater than the inner surface diameter of the upper end of the mandrel casing hanger. Threads 408 are formed on the outer surface of the second section 402 of the top nut for threading onto the internal threads 328 formed on the inner surface of the upper end of the mandrel casing head. The top nut first and second outer surface sections are aligned with the first inner surface section of the top nut. In this regard, a leg 410 is defined extending at the lower end of the top nut.
The top nut is threaded on the inner surface of the casing head. As the top nut moves down on the casing head, the leg 410 of the top nut engages the vertical portion 382 of the spring loaded latch ring, moving the spring loaded latch ring radially outwards against the latch ring spring force such that the second horizontal portion 386 of the latch ring slides into the groove 330 formed on the inner surface of the casing head while the first horizontal portion remains within the groove 326 formed on the outer surface of the mandrel casing head. In this regard, the spring loaded latch ring along with the top nut retain the mandrel casing hanger within the casing head.
A seal 412 is formed on the third outer surface section of the top nut for sealing against the casing head. In the alternative the seal may be formed on the casing head for sealing against the third section of the top nut. A seal 414 is also formed on the second section inner surface of the top nut for sealing against the outer surface of the mandrel casing hanger. In the alternative, the seal may be formed on the outer surface of the casing hanger for sealing against the second section of the inner surface of the top nut.
To check the seal between the outer surface of the lower section of the cylindrical section of the wellhead isolation tool and the inner surface of the mandrel casing hanger, a port 416 is defined radially through the flange 370 of the wellhead isolation tool. The port provides access to a passage 415 having a first portion 417 radially extending through the flange 370, a second portion 418 extending axially along the cylindrical section of the wellhead isolation tool, and a third portion 419 extending radially outward to a location between the seals 388 formed between the lower section of the wellhead isolation tool and the mandrel casing hanger. Pressure, such as air pressure, may be applied to port 416 to test the integrity of the seals 388. After testing the port 416 is plugged with a pipe plug 413.
With any of the aforementioned exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tools, a passage such as the passage 415 shown in
The upper assembly is secured on the wellhead isolation tool using methods well known in the art such as bolts and nuts. Similarly, an exemplary embodiment wellhead isolation tool is mounted on the tubing head assembly using bolts 409 and nuts 411.
In another exemplary embodiment assembly of the present invention shown in
With this exemplary embodiment, a mandrel casing hanger 452 is mated and locked against the body member 420 using a spring loaded latch ring 432 in combination with a top nut 434 in the same manner as described in relation to the exemplary embodiment shown in
Once the wellhead isolation tool 422 is seated on the body member 420, a segmented lock ring 440 is mated with the wickers 430 formed on the outer surface of the body member. Complementary wickers 431 are formed on the inner surface of the segmented lock ring and intermesh with the wickers 430 on the outer surface of the body member. In an alternate embodiment, the segmented lock ring may be threaded to a thread formed on the outer surface of the body member. An annular nut 442 is then threaded on the threads 428 formed on the outer surface of the intermediate flange 424 of the wellhead isolation tool. The annular flange has a portion 444 that extends over and surrounds the segmented lock ring. Fasteners (i.e., load applying members) 446 are threaded through the annular nut and apply pressure against the segmented lock ring 440 locking the annular nut relative to the segmented lock ring. An annular groove 433 is defined by the annular step 425 when the annular nut 442, where the annular nut is threaded in the intermediate flange 424.
In an exemplary embodiment, the segmented lock ring 440 is formed from segments 500 as for example shown in
In some exemplary embodiments, as for example the exemplary embodiment shown in
When one set of wicker surfaces are tapered, as for example, the upper or lower surfaces, then, by orienting the slot 506 to extend to one edge of the segment, as for example the upper edge as shown in
An internal thread 448 is formed on the lower inner surface of the annular nut 442. A lock nut 450 is threaded onto the internal thread 448 of the annular nut and is sandwiched between the body member 420 and the annular nut 442. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The connection using the segmented lock ring 450 and lock nut can be used to couple all types of wellhead equipment including the body member 420 to the annular nut 442 as described herein. Use of a segmented lock ring and lock nut allows for the quick coupling and decoupling of the wellhead assembly members.
Seals 460 are formed between a lower portion of the wellhead isolation tool 422 and an inner surface of the hanger 452. This is accomplished by fitting seals 460 in grooves 462 formed on the outer surface of the wellhead isolation tool 422 for sealing against the inner surface of hanger 452. Alternatively the seals may be fitted in grooves formed on the inner surface of the hanger 452 for sealing against the outer surface of the wellhead isolation tool. To check the seal between the outer surface of the wellhead isolation tool 422 and the inner surface of the hanger 452, a port 465 is defined through the flange 426 of the wellhead isolation tool and down along the well head isolation tool to a location between the seals 460 formed between the wellhead isolation tool and the hanger 452.
With any of the aforementioned embodiment, one or more seals may be used to provide the appropriate sealing. Moreover, any of the aforementioned embodiment wellhead isolation tools and assemblies provide advantages in that they isolate the wellhead or tubing head body from pressures of refraction in process while at the same time allowing the use of a valve instead of a BOP when forming the upper assembly 80. In addition, by providing a seal at the bottom portion of the wellhead isolation tool, each of the wellhead isolation exemplary embodiment tools of the present invention isolate the higher pressures to the lower sections of the tubing head or tubing head/casing head combination which tend to be heavier sections and can better withstand the pressure loads. Furthermore, they allow for multiple fracturing processes and allow the wellhead isolation tool to be used in multiple wells without having to use a BOP between fracturing processes from wellhead to wellhead. Consequently, multiple BOPs are not required when fracturing multiple wells.
In another exemplary embodiment, as shown in
The tubing mandrel hanger has a tapering lower outer surface portion 612 such that the outer surface diameter is reduced in an downward direction. The casing head has a tapering inner surface portion 614 that is complementary to the tapering outer surface portion 612 of the tubing mandrel hanger. When seated on the casing head, the tapering inner surface portion 612 of the tubing mandrel hanger is seated on the tapering inner surface of the casing head. An annular shoulder 617 is formed above the tapering outer surface portion of the tubing mandrel hanger.
A top nut 616 is threaded on an inner surface of the casing head and over the shoulder 617. As the casing head top nut is threaded on the casing head it exerts a force on the shoulder 617 for retaining the tubing mandrel hanger on the casing head. One or more seals are positioned between the two tapering outer surfaces for providing a seal between the tubing head and the tubing mandrel hanger. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The isolation tool 600, in the exemplary embodiment shown in
The isolation tool is fitted over the tubing mandrel hanger 608 and the studs 604 of the collar nut 602 penetrate openings 640 formed through the second flange 638. Nuts 643 are installed on the studs and tightened, thus securing the isolation tool to the tubing mandrel hanger. When fitted over the tubing mandrel hanger, the third section 630 of the central opening 624 of the isolation tool surrounds the outer surface of the tubing mandrel hanger. The second inner annular shoulder 636 of the isolation tool is seated on an end 646 of the tubing mandrel hanger. The first inner annular shoulder 632 of the isolation tool is positioned over an end 648 of the wear sleeve. The central opening 624 of the isolation tool is also aligned with the central bore 611 of the tubing mandrel hanger.
One or more seals are formed between the isolation tool and the tubing mandrel hanger. In the exemplary embodiment, two annular grooves 642 are formed on the outer surface of the tubing mandrel hanger. A seal 644, such as an O-ring seal, is fitted in each groove for sealing against the inner surface of the third section 630 of the central opening 624 of the isolation tool. In an alternate exemplary embodiment, the grooves are formed on the inner surface of the third section of the central opening of the isolation tool. Seals are fitted within these grooves for sealing against the outer surface of the tubing mandrel hanger. A test port 631 is defined through the second flange and the third section of the central opening of the isolation tool for testing the integrity of the seal between the isolation tool and the tubing mandrel hanger. When the isolation tool is mounted on the tubing mandrel hanger in the exemplary embodiment shown in
After completion of the fracturing process, the isolation tool, the collar nut with studs and the wear sleeve are removed and an independent tubing head 650, as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
As can be seen from
The wellhead isolation tools of the present invention as well as the wellhead assemblies used in combination with the wellhead tools of the present invention including, among other things, the tubing heads and casing heads may be formed from steel, steel alloys and/or stainless steel. These parts may be formed by various well known methods such as casting, forging and/or machining.
While the present invention will be described in connection with the depicted exemplary embodiments, it will be understood that such description is not intended to limit the invention only to those embodiments, since changes and modifications may be made therein which are within the full intended scope of this invention as hereinafter claimed. For example, instead of the top nut 616, the tubing mandrel hanger may be retained on the casing head using a latch ring 380 with top nut 392 as for example shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/480,410, filed May 24, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/757,940, filed on Apr. 9, 2010, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,272,433 on Sep. 25, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/154,338, filed on May 21, 2008, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,726,393 on Jun. 1, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/891,431, filed on Aug. 9, 2007, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,416,020 on Aug. 26, 2008, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/272,289, filed on Nov. 9, 2005, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,407 on Jan. 29, 2008, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/947,778, filed on Sep. 23, 2004, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,493,944 on Feb. 24, 2009, which claims priority and is based upon U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/506,461, filed on Sep. 26, 2003, and is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/462,941, filed on Jun. 17, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/369,070, filed on Feb. 19, 2003, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,920,925 on Jul. 26, 2005, which claims priority and is based upon Provisional Application No. 60/357,939, filed on Feb. 19, 2002, the contents of all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1867093 | Pivoto | Jul 1932 | A |
1989679 | Broussard | Feb 1935 | A |
2074923 | Kitchel et al. | Mar 1937 | A |
2109031 | O'Neal | Feb 1938 | A |
2157964 | Mueller | May 1939 | A |
2350867 | Bean et al. | Jun 1944 | A |
2383248 | Garrett | Aug 1945 | A |
2478628 | Hasen | Aug 1949 | A |
2927643 | Dellinger | Mar 1960 | A |
3080180 | Rector | Mar 1963 | A |
3166125 | Hubby | Jan 1965 | A |
3186488 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3188118 | Jones | Jun 1965 | A |
3190354 | Stone | Jun 1965 | A |
3209829 | Haeber et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3321217 | Ahlstone | May 1967 | A |
3341227 | Pierce, Jr. | Sep 1967 | A |
3414056 | Brown et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3431965 | Tillman | Mar 1969 | A |
3608932 | Brown | Sep 1971 | A |
3738426 | Drouin | Jun 1973 | A |
3827728 | Hynes | Aug 1974 | A |
3830304 | Cummins | Aug 1974 | A |
3848421 | O'Brien et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3976093 | Cornelius | Aug 1976 | A |
4111261 | Oliver | Sep 1978 | A |
4114928 | Lochte | Sep 1978 | A |
4116044 | Garrett | Sep 1978 | A |
4202410 | Quebe | May 1980 | A |
4241786 | Bullen | Dec 1980 | A |
4552213 | Boyd et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4640348 | Roberts | Feb 1987 | A |
4657075 | McLeod | Apr 1987 | A |
4690221 | Ritter, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697828 | Chou | Oct 1987 | A |
4799714 | Collet | Jan 1989 | A |
4819967 | Calder et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4867243 | Garner et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4991650 | McLeod | Feb 1991 | A |
4993489 | McLeod | Feb 1991 | A |
5060723 | Sutherland et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069288 | Singeetham | Dec 1991 | A |
5076356 | Reimert | Dec 1991 | A |
5103900 | McLeod et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5113936 | Sutherland | May 1992 | A |
5143158 | Watkins et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5236037 | Watkins | Aug 1993 | A |
5285852 | McLeod | Feb 1994 | A |
5289882 | Moore | Mar 1994 | A |
5372202 | Dallas | Dec 1994 | A |
5490565 | Baker | Feb 1996 | A |
5492373 | Smith | Feb 1996 | A |
5540282 | Dallas | Jul 1996 | A |
5605194 | Smith | Feb 1997 | A |
5735344 | Duncan | Apr 1998 | A |
5785121 | Dallas | Jul 1998 | A |
5819851 | Dallas | Oct 1998 | A |
5927403 | Dallas | Jul 1999 | A |
5975211 | Harris | Nov 1999 | A |
6039120 | Wilkins et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6092596 | Van Bilderbeek | Jul 2000 | A |
6179053 | Dallas | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196323 | Møksvold | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199914 | Duhn | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220363 | Dallas | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260624 | Pallini, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289993 | Dallas | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328343 | Hosie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345668 | Reilly | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360822 | Robertson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364024 | Dallas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6516861 | Allen | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6640902 | Baten et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6688386 | Cornelssen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712147 | Dallas | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7032677 | McGuire et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066269 | Dallas et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128143 | Van Bilderbeek | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159652 | McGuire et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7237615 | Dallas et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020062964 | Allen | May 2002 | A1 |
20020100592 | Garrett et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117298 | Wong et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125005 | Eslinger et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020185276 | Muller et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195248 | Ingram et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000693 | Couren et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019628 | Ravensbergen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024709 | Cuppen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060017287 | Milberger | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060185841 | Swagerty et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196677 | McGuire et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080083539 | Hickie | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 428 613 | Nov 2004 | CA |
Entry |
---|
ARP/IRP's on-line, 4 pages. |
Cameron, Full Bore Time Saving Wellhead Installation Procedure, Surface Wellhead Proposals Publication RP-830, Jun. 19, 2003, Rev. 1,pp. 1-37. |
Cooper Oil Tool, W-K-M Wellhead Equipment Catalog 86, article entitled “W-K-M Metal-to-Metal Sealing Tubing Hangers”, © 1994 Cooper Industries, Houston, Texas. |
Guardian, Casing & Tree Savers, 2000, 3 pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, dated Nov. 9, 2005. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Mar. 17, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-0WW-LJO, dated Mar. 2, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 7, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 11, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Responses to Cooper Cameron Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-7), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 17, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Responses to Cooper Cameron Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Tangible Things, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 17, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 1-7), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 24, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Answers and Objections to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-3), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 24, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Answers and Objections to Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 4-20), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jul. 10, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Motion and Motion by Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jul. 15, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Memorandum and Points of Authority in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jul. 15, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jul. 15, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Responses to Plaintiff's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 8-21), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jul. 10, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Validity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 4, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Response to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Validity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 4, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Statement of Additional Undisputed Facts in Support of its Cross Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Validity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 4, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 14, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool Inc.'s Supplemental Response to Interrogatory No. 1, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 18, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief for Markman Hearing, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 21, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Edward R. Schwartz in Support of Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 21, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Opening Markman Brief, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Aug. 21, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Opposition of Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. to Defendant's Opening Markman Brief, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 5, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Edward R. Schwartz in Support of the Opposition of Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. to Defendant's Opening Markman Brief, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 5, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Markman Opposition Brief, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 5, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Reply in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment that U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925 is Valid, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 11, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Supplemental Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 18, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Dependant's Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Additional Undisputed Facts in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 18, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Objection to and Motion to Strike Defendant's Supplemental Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 19, 2006. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Submission of Proposed Order Resolving Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Objection to and Motion to Strike Defendant's Supplemental Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 26, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool's Reply to Defendant Cooper Cameron's Supplemental Brief, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Sep. 28, 2006. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Supplemental Brief Regarding Prosecution History Estoppel; Declaration of Edward R. Schwartz, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Oct. 20, 2006. |
Hon. Oliver W. Wanger, U.S. District Judge, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum Decision and Order Re Claim Interpretation, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Feb. 1, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Responses to Cooper Cameron Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Feb. 8, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s First Supplemental Answers and Objections to Plaintiff's First and Second Sets of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-20), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Feb. 25, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Supplemental Responses to Cooper Cameron Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Tangible Things, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 11, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Response to Cooper Cameron Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Tangible Things, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 13, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Answers and Objections to Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-32), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Apr. 30, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Third Supplemental Answers and Objections to Plaintiff's First and Second Sets of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-20), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jun. 3, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s First Supplemental Answers and Objections to Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-32), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO, dated Jun. 4, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Response to Defendant's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Tangible Things (Nos. 5-45), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Aug. 27, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Responses to Defendant's Second Set of Interrogatories, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 12, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Responses to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corp.'s Second [sic Third] Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-23) [(sic Nos. 28-31)], United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of Claims 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 19, 29, 31 and 86 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925 and of Validity of the Patent, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum of Points and Authorities Supporting Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Cooper Cameron Corporation Infringes Claims 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 19, 29, 31 and 86 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925 and of the Patent's Validity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-New (TAG), dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of Claims 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 19, 29, 31 and 86 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925 and of Validity of the Patent, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of Claims 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 19, 29, 31 and 86 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925 and of Validity of the Patent, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Motion and Motion by Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 29, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Filing Sealed Documents in Support of Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement Regarding Defendant's Patent Pending and New Style Designs , United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Sep. 29, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Revised Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-NEW (TAG), dated Oct. 12, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 6, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity as to the Asserted Claims 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 19, 29, 31 and 86 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 6, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant Cameron's Response to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity as to the Asserts Claims 2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 19, 29, 31 and 86 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,925, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 6, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Response to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 6, 2007. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Reply to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 20, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 20, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Reply Regarding its Undisputed Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 20, 2007. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Objection to Evidence Submitted in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in View of the Prior Art, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated May 2, 2008. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's List of Exhibits Presented at the May 5, 2008 Hearing on the Parties' Motions for Summary Judgment—United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated May 29, 2008. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Opposition to Cameron's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement Regarding its Original and New Style Designs, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jun. 13, 2008; (26 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement Regarding Defendant's Original and New Style Designs, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jun. 30, 2008; (16 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement Regarding Defendant's Original and New Style Designs, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jun. 30, 2008; (51 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 10, 2008; (3 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 10, 2008; (31 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Rex Duhn in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 10, 2008; (12 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Robert K. Meek in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 10, 2008; (6 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of William J. Kolegraff in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 10, 2008; (251 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 24, 2008; (31 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 25, 2008; (24 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Reply in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend the Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 1, 2008, (12 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of James M. Whitelaw in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Reply Regarding its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 1, 2008, (38 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Rex E. Duhn in Support of Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 1, 2008, (2 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Phil Terry in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Reply Regarding its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, Dec. 1, 2008, (6 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of Constantine Marantidis in Support of Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 1, 2008, (2 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Motion and Motion by Defendant Cameron for Leave to Amend and Supplement its Answer and Counterclaims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 21, 2009, (3 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Memorandum and Points of Authority in Support of its Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement its Answer and Counterclaims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWWW-GSA, dated Jan. 21, 2009, (13 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant's Memorandum and Points of Authority in Support of its Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement its Answer and Counterclaims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 22, 2009, (143 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement its Answer and Counterclaims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 6, 2009, (16 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 9, 2009, (19 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 9, 2009, (50 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement its Answer and Counterclaims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 13, 2009, (13 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Duhn's Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint and Request for Jury Trial Re: its Proposed Amendment, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 17, 2009, (12 Pages). |
Hon. Oliver W. Wanger, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and for Jury Trial for Proposed Amendment (Doc. 268) and Denying in Part and Granting in Part Defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Answer and Counterclaims (Doc. 274) and Deferring Trial on Defendant's New Claims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CV-F-05-1411OWW/GSA, dated Mar. 4, 2009, (27 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Objections to Proposed Order Submitted by Plaintiff Duhn Oil Regarding Denial of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 6, 2009, (19 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Response in Opposition to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's [Proposed] Order Re: Duhn's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Requirement for Accounting Records, and in Further Support of Duhn's [Proposed] Order Re: the Same, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 6, 2009, (9 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Responses to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Fifth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and things (Nos. 80-95), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 6, 2009, (10 Pages). |
Hon. Oliver W. Wanger, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum Decision and Denying Defendant's Motion to Strike First Amended Complaint (Doc. 294), United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CV-F-05-1411OWW/GSA, dated Jun. 9, 2009, (12 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jun. 23, 2009, (18 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Answer to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Counterclaims, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 16, 2009, (6 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Motion and Motion by Defendant Cameron for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 30, 2009, (3 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Memorandum and Points of Authority in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 30, 2009, (30 Pages). |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 30, 2009, (122 Pages). |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.; Pleading Index; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division; Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-LJO; dated Mar. 7, 2011; 117 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Answer to Defendant Cooper Cameron Corporation's Counterclaims; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 16, 2009; 6 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Second Amended Complaint Claims of Contributory and Inducement Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 10, 2010; 8 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Motion and Motion by Defendant Cameron's to Dismiss Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Second Amended Complaint Claims of Contributory and Inducement Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 10, 2010; 3 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Claims of Contributory and Inducement Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated May 3, 2010; 8 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Second Amended Complaint Claims of Contributory and Inducement Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated May 17, 2010; 5 Pages. |
Wanger, Oliver W.; Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum Decision Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claims of Contributory and Inducement Infringement With Leave to Amend (Doc. 414); United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jun. 9, 2010; 11 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Order Granting Defendant Cameron's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Second Amended Complaint Claims of Contributory and Inducement Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jun. 21, 2010; 2 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 12, 2010; 17 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Supplemental Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jul. 12, 2010; 7 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Reply in Support of Its Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Sep. 27, 2010; 15 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Answer to Defendant Cameron's Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Oct. 7, 2010; 7 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Cameron's Objections to Duhn Oil's Alternative Section of the Jointly Submitted Proposed Order Granting Cameron's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement for Its New Style and Original Designs; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Oct. 14, 2010; 14 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Cameron's Objections to Duhn Oil's Alternative Section of the Jointly Submitted Proposed Order Granting Cameron's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement for Its New Style and Original Designs; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Oct. 14, 2010; 47 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 8, 2010; 15 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant Cameron's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 8, 2010; 17 Pages. |
Wanger, Oliver W.; Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Order Regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement for Cameron's New Style and Original Designs; and Supplementing Claim Construction; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Nov. 10, 2010; 2 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence, Argument or Instructions Regarding a Purported Non-Infringement Opinion; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 10 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence, Argument or Instructions Regarding Its Allegation That John A. Rogers Is a Co-Inventor of Patent No. 6,920,925; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 8 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence or Argument Regarding Inequitable Conduct Based on Duhn's Alleged Failure to Apprise the Patent Office of the Instant Action During Prosecution of the ′407 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 5 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 5 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence or Argument Regarding Duhn's Corporate Identification Disclosure Statement; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 5 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude Cameron From Presenting Argument or Evidence Alleging That Prior to Apr. 2009 Cameron's FAC Mandrel Has a Substantial Non-Infringing Use; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 5 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 7 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence or Argument Regarding the Second Opinion of James E. Bradley; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 20 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 8 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence or Argument Regarding Previously Asserted Patent Claims; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 5 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 9 to Preclude Cameron From Offering Evidence or Argument Regarding Any Arguments Made by Duhn Re the Scope of the Claims of the ′925 Patent Prior to the Court's Order Claim Construction Order; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2010; 3 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's Motion in Limine No. 6 Regarding Alleged Contributory Infringement Prior to Apr. 2009; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 29, 2010; 6 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Trial Brief; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 30, 2010; 37 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc's Trial Brief Pursuant to Local Rule 285; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Dec. 30, 2010; 38 Pages. |
Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response to Duhn Oil's Trial Brief; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 4, 2011; 17 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc's Response to Defendant Cameron's Trial Brief; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 4, 2011; 6 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Supplemental Response to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Duross 0' Bryan's Proposed Testimony; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 7, 2011; 7 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Trial Exhibit List; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 10, 2011; 22 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Joint Exhibits List; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 10, 2011; 10 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's First Amended Exhibit List Exchanged Pursuant to Local Rule 281(B); United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 11, 2011; 22 Pages. |
Oliver W. Wanger, United States District Judge, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Order Re Defendant Cameron's Motions in Limine; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 13, 2011; 6 Pages. |
Oliver W. Wanger, United States District Judge, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Order Re Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool's Motions in Limine; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 19, 2011; 8 Pages. |
Oliver W. Wanger, United States District Judge, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Order Granting in Part Defendant Cameron's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Lost-Profits Damages (Doc. 319 and 430); United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Jan. 24, 2011; 2 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Brief in Support of Request to Enter Judgment for Patent Infringement Damages; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 9, 2011; 37 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of James Whitelaw in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 9, 2011; 196 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Response in Opposition to Duhn Oil's Request for Entry Judgment; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 10, 2011; 3 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Supplemental Briefing Re: Conduct of Trial and Legal/Equitable Issues Presented to the Jury; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 28, 2011; 23 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Brief Re Advisory Jury Findings; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 28, 2011; 21 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Supplemental Briefing Re: Conduct of Trial and Legal Equitable Issues Presented to the Jury Doc. ID #682, (Exhibits 682-1); United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Feb. 28, 2011; 79 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Reply Re: Conduct of Trial and Legal/Equitable Issues Presented to the Jury; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 7, 2011; 10 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Reply to Cameron's “Supplemental Briefing Re Conduct of Trial and Legal/Equitable Issues Presented to the Jury”; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 7, 2011; 6 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, [Defendant Cameron's Proposed] Rule 52 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 7, 2011; 34 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn's [Proposed] Rule 52 Findings and Conclusions; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Mar. 7, 2011; 66 Pages. |
Oliver W. Wanger, United States District Judge, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum Decision Regarding Motions for Entry of Judgment, Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Sep. 30, 2011; 66 Pages. |
Oliver W. Wanger, United States District Judge, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Order Re: Motion for Entry of Judgment, Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-OWW-GSA, dated Sep. 30, 2011; 2 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Joint Statement Regarding Defense of Anticipation; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-LJO-GSA, dated Nov. 2, 2011; 8 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of Claims 1-5, 19 and 29 of Duhn's ′925 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-LJO-GSA, dated Nov. 14, 2011; 3 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Request for Reconsideration of Memo. Re: Order Entry of Judgment, and JMOL; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-LJO-GSA, dated Nov. 14, 2011; 28 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Cameron's Request for Reconsideration of Memo Re: Entry of Judgment and JMOL; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 1, 2011; 26 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil's MSJ Re: No Invalidity of Claims 1-5, 19 and 29 of Duhn's ′925 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 1, 2011; 32 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn's Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of Claims 1-5, 19 and 29 of Duhn's ′925 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 9, 2011; 15 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Reply in Support of Its Request for Reconsideration of Memo. Re: Order Entry of Judgment, and JMOL; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 9, 2011; 11 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Notice of Manual Lodging of Tangible Items in Support of Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of Claims 1-5, 19 and 29 of Duhn's ′925 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2011; 2 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Claim Charts Re: Prior Art ′993 Patent and ′94 Catalog; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2011; 131 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Pretrial Disclosures; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Dec. 14, 2011; 35 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Pretrial Disclosures; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Jan. 16, 2012; 48 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Second Supplemental Claim Charts Re: Prior Art ′993 Patent and 1994 Cameron Catalog in Response to Duhn Oil's Supplemental Claim Charts; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Feb. 13, 2012; 53 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Trial Brief Pursuant to Local Rule 285; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Feb. 14, 2012; 30 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Declaration of William J. Kolegraff in Support of Duhn Oil Tool, Inc's Trial Brief Pursuant to Local Rule 285; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Feb. 14, 2012; 55 Pages. |
Cameron International Corporation, Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cameron International Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Trial Brief; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Feb. 14, 2012; 26 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.'s Second Amended Trial Exhibit List; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Feb. 15, 2012; 7 Pages. |
Marilyn L. Huff, United States District Court Judge; Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Memorandum Decision; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Feb. 23, 2012; 28 pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Defendant Cameron's Renewed Request for Reconsideration and Vacatur of Judge Wanger's JMOL, and Reinstatement of the Jury's Verdict of Obviousness Invalidity for Claim 3 of the ′925 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Mar. 9, 2012; 26 Pages. |
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc., Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Exhibits to Defendant Cameron's Renewed Request for Reconsideration and Vacatur of Judge Wanger's JMOL, and Reinstatement of the Jury's Verdict of Obviousness Invalidity for Claim 3 of the ′925 Patent; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated Mar. 9, 2012; 102 Pages. |
Marilyn L. Huff, United States District Court Judge; Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. vs. Cooper Cameron Corporation, Order: (1) Granting Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration on the Issue of Obviousness of Claim 3; (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Nonobviousness of Claim 3; (3) Reinstating Jury's Verdict of Obviousness of Claim 3; and (4) Vacating the Damage Award; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA, dated May 8, 2012; 26 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130068447 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60506461 | Sep 2003 | US | |
60357939 | Feb 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11272289 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11891431 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13480410 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13671415 | US | |
Parent | 12757940 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13480410 | US | |
Parent | 12154338 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 12757940 | US | |
Parent | 11891431 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12154338 | US | |
Parent | 10947778 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11272289 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10462941 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10947778 | US | |
Parent | 10369070 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 10462941 | US |