Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6749720
-
Patent Number
6,749,720
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, March 21, 200123 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 15, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Eckert; Inger H.
- Dottavio; James J.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 162 145
- 162 150
- 162 183
- 162 1681
- 162 169
-
International Classifications
-
-
Disclaimer
Terminal disclaimer Term Extension
400
Abstract
A wet-formed permeable mat composed of wet use chopped strands (WUCS), chopped roving, and potentially unidirectional roving coupled with an alkaline resistant binder are combined to create an randomly oriented open mat structure with a high degree of openness that can be used in cement backerboard applications. The cement backerboard that is subsequently formed from the wet-formed permeable mat has lower binder content, superior decorative finish, and better permeability control than known glass scrim systems and can be produced in a single continuous step.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to cement backerboards and more specifically to wet formed mat applications for cement backerboards.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Interior and exterior construction boards with cores of plaster, cement, or hybrid materials, such as cement boards or gypsum boards, are used in a wide variety of indoor and outdoor structural applications. For example, cement boards are used as a support surface for overlying materials such as wood siding, stucco, aluminum, brick, tile, stone aggregate and marble. Also, cement boards are used in exterior insulating systems, commercial roof deck systems, masonry applications and exterior curtain walls.
Generally, cement boards contain a core formed of a cementitious material and low density fillers that are interposed between two facing layers. Facing materials advantageously contribute flexural and impact strength to the high compressive strength but brittle material forming the cementitious core. In addition, the facing material can provide a durable surface and/or other desirable properties to the cement board.
One material that has been used to form facing materials is alkaline resistant, binder coated glass fibers. Glass fiber facings provide increased dimensional stability in the presence of moisture and provide greater physical and mechanical properties to the cement board. These facing sheets are formed as randomly oriented fibrous glass mats or open mesh glass scrims formed from continuous glass yarns. Known methods for making cementitious boards consists of providing a continuous feed of facing material and depositing a cementitious slurry onto the top surface of the facing material. A second continuous feed of facing material is then applied to the top surface of the slurry. The slurry is dried to harden the cementitious composition and to integrate the facing material into the cement board. The cement board is subsequently cut to a predetermined length for shipping and eventual use.
Known glass scrim systems used to make the glass facing sheets typically include about 60% polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and glass scrim solutions that are manufactured in an expensive, two step process. Although some binder protection from highly alkaline conditions is required, the high binder levels are more likely due to process/coating related issues. Higher binder loading levels are required in existing glass facing sheets due to (i) throughput issues in a single strand coating operation, if precoated strands are employed; (ii) coating control issues that arise in coating pre-weaved fabrics; and (iii) possible wet out issues associated with thick, plasticized PVC resins. Biaxial 0/90 oriented scrims exhibit pitting in highly open porous regions.
It is therefore highly desirable to provide glass scrim system that can be formed in a single step operation that uses less binder material. It is also highly desirable that such a process will result in superior decorative finishes and better permeability control.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention comprises combining an alkaline resistant binder with a permeable wet-formed mat composed of wet use chopped strands (WUCS), chopped dry strands or roving, and potentially unidirectional roving to create an open mat structure that can be used in cement backerboard applications.
A unique aspect of the present invention is the behavior of the wet chop strands and dry chop strands in the dispersion prior to forming the mat. Wet chop strands tend to spread out randomly within the whitewater dispersion. Dry chop strands will also randomly orient, however the material tends to stay together in the whitewater dispersion (like a log). Hence, the permeable matting formed is not a completely random network of wet and dry chop, thereby giving a mat with a higher degree of openness as measured by Frazier air permeability. This improves cement impregnation.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon considering the following detailed description and appended claims, and upon reference to the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a perspective view of a randomly oriented open mesh filament network according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2
is a perspective view of a randomly oriented open mesh filament network according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3
is a perspective view of a processing line used to form the a wet formed permeable mat and the randomly oriented open mesh filament network of
FIGS. 1 and 2
; and
FIGS. 4-9
illustrate the manner of precasting the cement backerboard using the wet permeable mat of FIG.
3
.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
FIGS. 1 and 2
illustrate a randomly oriented open mesh filament network
14
according to two preferred embodiments of the present invention. As will be shown in
FIG. 3
below, the randomly oriented open mesh filament network
14
of
FIGS. 1 and 2
may then be impregnated with an alkaline resistant binder
16
to form a wet permeable mat
10
. This wet permeable mat
10
, in turn, may be immersed and embedded with cement to form a cement backerboard
110
having improved decorative characteristics and other properties as described in FIG.
4
.
Referring to
FIG. 1
, the randomly oriented open mesh filament network
14
comprises a combination of sized wet use chop strands (WUCS)
18
and sized dry chop fiber strands
20
in lengths between approximately 0.75 and 1.5 inches in approximately a 25-75/75-25 weight percentage ratio (or between a 3:1 and 1:3 weight percent ratio). As shown in
FIG. 3
below, the strands
18
,
20
are randomly dispersed throughout the network
14
using a whitewater chemical dispersion
71
.
Preferably, the strands
18
,
20
comprise E-type glass filaments, S-type glass filaments, alkaline resistant glass filaments, or ECR-type glass filaments such as Owens Corning's Advantex® glass fibers. However, other types of fiber having sufficient modulus (i.e. similar in modulus to the fibers described above) may be used as well, including basalt fibers and wood natural fibers such as cellulose and wood.
In the case of wet use chop strands
18
, low solids sizing compositions are employed that contain high dispersive chemistries. The finished product remains in a moist state having moisture contents running between 10 and 25%. One preferred wet use chop strand
18
having a low solids sizing that meets these requirements is Owens Corning's 9501 filaments.
In the case of dry chop strands
20
, sizing compositions having higher solids levels are employed, and the filaments are dried and cured before final packaging. One preferred dry chop strand
20
having a high solids coating that meets these requirements is Owens Corning's 893 filaments, available in roving form but capable of being chopped into the proper size by methods well known in the art.
In an alternative preferred embodiment, as shown in
FIG. 2
, the network
14
also comprises unidirectional rovings
22
combined with a 25-75/75-25 weight percentage ratio of wet use and dry strands
18
,
20
. The unidirectional rovings
22
comprise approximately 20 to 50% of the total fiber weight of the network
14
. The unidirectional rovings
22
have a similar sizing composition to the dry use strands
20
. One preferred unidirectional roving
22
that meets these requirements is Owens Corning's 377 unidirectional glass rovings.
FIG. 3
illustrates a processing line
17
used for forming the random open mesh filament network
14
of
FIGS. 1 and 2
and further forming a wet process permeable mat
10
that is used to make a cement backerboard
110
. A 25-75/75-25 by weight percentage combination of the wet chop
18
and dry chop strands
20
are added to a whitewater chemical dispersion
71
within a whitewater tank
70
to form a thick whitewater slurry
72
at consistency levels of approximately 0.2 to 1 percent. The whitewater chemical dispersion
71
is used to obtain reasonable filamentation of wet used strands
18
through steric, thermodynamic, and charge colloidal interactions. A preferred whitewater dispersion
71
includes a cationic dispersant, an anionic viscosity modifier, a defoamer and a biocide. The pH of the whitewater chemical dispersion
71
is maintained at approximately 8 by adding ammonia. To take advantage of charge differences between mostly anionic and partially cationic surfaces of the E-type glass, the cationic dispersant is typically added first, followed by the strands
18
,
20
, defoamer, and viscosity modifier to form the dispersion
71
. Additives such as dry strength agents and wet strength agents known in the art may also be added to the dispersion
71
.
The anionic viscosity modifiers used in the whitewater dispersion
71
preferably have molar anionicities between approximately 25 and 40% and molecular weights of about 16 million. One preferred class of anionic viscosity modifiers is a polyacrylamide viscosity modifier such as Nalco 7768, Magnifloc 1886A, and HyChem AE 874. However, other possible viscosity modifiers or flocculants that may be used include hydroxyethyl cellulose and polyamines.
Preferably, the cationic dispersants used comprise ethoxylated alkylamine dispersants such as Nalco 8493, Schercopol DS-140, and Rhodameen VP532. However, other dispersants may be used as well, including amine oxides and polyethoxylated derivatives of amide condensation of fatty acid products. Also, preferred defoamers include Nalco PP04-3840 and Nopco NXZ.
A unique aspect of the present invention is the behavior of the wet chop strands
18
and dry chop strands
20
in the dispersion
71
. The wet chop strands
18
have a tendency to spread out randomly within the dispersion
71
. The dry chop strands
20
will also randomly orient, however the material tends to stay together in the dispersion
71
(like a log). Hence, the network
14
and subsequently formed permeable mat
10
formed is not a completely random network of wet and dry chop strands
18
,
20
. As will be discussed below, the permeable mat
10
that is formed has a higher degree of openness as measured by Frazier air permeability. This improves cement impregnation.
The thick slurry
72
formed is maintained under agitation in a single tank
73
or series of tanks. The thick slurry
72
is then delivered through a control valve
74
and combined with a thin stock stream
76
from a silo
78
to form a lower consistency slurry
80
in the former
82
. The thin stock stream
76
comprises the same whitewater chemicals as the thick slurry
72
with low concentrations of the strands
18
,
20
. The ratio of thick slurry
72
to the silo stream
78
in the lower consistency slurry
80
should not exceed 20:1 to obtain good mixing characteristics.
The former
82
functions to equally distribute and randomly align the strands
18
,
20
to form the open mesh filament network
14
. Formers
82
that can accommodate the initial fiber formation include Fourdrinier machines, Stevens Former, Roto Former, Inver Former, cylinder, and VertiFormer machines. These formers offer several control mechanisms
90
to control fiber orientation within the network
14
such as drop leg and various pond regulator/wall adjustments.
Deposited fibers forming the network
14
are partially dried over a suction box
94
to exhibit correct release characteristics from the former wire
96
to the saturator section
98
. Preferably, the network
14
is guided from the former
82
to the saturator section
98
through a contact vacuum roller.
Upon entering the saturator section
98
, the network
14
is further dried with a first suction box
100
. A binder is then poured onto the network
14
from a curtain coater
16
or similar depositing device. The binder
16
coats and is pulled through the network
14
using a second suction box
104
. Additional suction boxes
106
may be employed to control the binder basis weight. Ideally, binder basis weight level is measured at the end of the line
17
using a binder basis-measuring device
108
. The network
14
is subsequently dried and cured in a dryer
110
such as a through-air dryer or honeycomb dryer to form the wet formed permeable mat
10
.
If optional unidirectional rovings
22
are used, they are introduced to the network
14
from a creel stand
101
, wherein operators will string the rovings
22
through guide dyes onto the network
14
that move slightly back and forth in the CD direction. Rovings are saturated with binder and are introduced prior to the binder curtain coater but after the first saturator suction box.
The binder
16
must provide alkalinity resistant for the fibers to work since silica, which is used in the glass network
14
, is attacked under strong alkaline conditions. Glass transition temperature is also an important criteria in selecting an appropriate binder
16
. For example, binders
16
having a glass transition temperature near the boiling point of water experience moisture diffusion/resin velocity problems that adversely affect film formation and mechanical properties.
Alkaline resistant binders
16
that meet these criteria and may be used include phenolics, melamines, acrylics, styrene-acrylates, styrene butadiene, and ethylene vinyl acetate. Preferably, phenolic-based binders are used, such as Borden Chemical's 5901 phenolic binder. Another preferred non-phenolic based binder that is used is Rohm and Haas' GL618 acrylic copolymer, which has a glass transition temperature of approximately 35 degrees Celsius. Example formulations for the mats
10
without unidirectional rovings
22
made with the 20% by weight acrylic binder and 30% by weight phenolic binder at various mat weights is illustrated below in Tables 1-6, while example formulations for mats
10
made with unidirectional rovings
22
are shown in Tables 7 and 8:
TABLE 1
|
|
GL 618 Example Handsheet Formulations
|
Overall Compositions in a 2 lb/sq mat with 20% Binder
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
3.3
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
3.3
|
SMC
|
GL 618
Acrylic Binder
Rohm & Haas
1.7
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 2
|
|
Overall Compositions in a 2.5 lb/sq mat with 20% Binder
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
4.2
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
4.2
|
SMC
|
GL 618
Acrylic Binder
Rohm & Haas
2.1
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 3
|
|
Overall Compositions in a 3.0 lb/sq mat with 20% Binder
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
5.0
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
5.0
|
SMC
|
GL 618
Acrylic Binder
Rohm & Haas
2.5
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 4
|
|
RE 176 Phenolic Example Handsheet Formulations
|
Overall Compositions in a 2 lb/sq mat with 30% Binder
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
2.9
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
2.9
|
SMC
|
AL-5901A
Phenolic Binder
Borden
2.5
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 5
|
|
Overall Compositions in a 2.5 lb/sq mat with 30% Binder
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
3.6
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
3.6
|
SMC
|
AL-5901A
Phenolic Binder
Borden
3.1
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 6
|
|
Overall Compositions in a 3.0 lb/sq mat with 30% Binder
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
4.4
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
4.4
|
SMC
|
AL-5901A
Phenolic Binder
Borden
3.7
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 7
|
|
Unidirectional Roving Example Handsheets
|
Amount of Glass/Whitewater Required for 2.5 lb/sq product at 20% LOI
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
2.1
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
2.1
|
SMC
|
377 Roving
377 Roving
Owens Corning
4.2
|
GL 618
Acrylic Binder
Rohm & Haas
2.1
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
TABLE 8
|
|
Amount of Glass/Whitewater Required for 2.5 lb/sq product at 30% LOI
|
Name
Description
Company
Amount
|
|
9501 WUCS*
9501 sized Wet Chop
Owens Corning
1.8
|
893 Chopped
893 sized Dry Chop
Owens Corning
1.8
|
SMC
|
377 Roving
377 Roving
Owens Corning
3.6
|
AL-5901A
Phenolic Binder
Borden
3.1
|
Nalclear 7768
Anionic Viscosity Modifier
Nalco
Trace
|
8493
Cationic Dispersant
Nalco
Trace
|
PP04-3840
Defoamer
Nalco
Trace
|
(Gram)
|
|
*Dry glass portion of WUCS
|
Tables 9A and 9B compares mats
10
made according to the present invention using various binder compositions with known mat systems and mat systems having variations of the preferred mat
10
compositions and to illustrate physical and decorative properties.
TABLE 9A
|
|
Glass
Binder
|
Basis
Basis
Basis
Basis
|
Binder
Binder
Weight
Weight
LOI
Weight
Weight
Thickness
|
Material
Description
Manufacturer
(lb/sq)
(gsm)
(%)
(lb/sq)
(lb/sq)
(0.001″)
|
|
PVC
PVC Scrim -
2.2
1.1E + 02
61
0.9
1.3
11.6
|
0/90 PVC/E-
|
Glass Tows
|
(60% LOI)
|
Roofing Mat
Portland
1.9
9.3E + 01
19
1.5
0.4
23.8
|
3500
Enterprise
National
1.8
8.8E + 01
19
1.5
0.3
14.1
|
Mat with
Starch or
|
WUCS/Chopped
Air Products
|
Roving with
|
EVA Binder
|
5901E
5901
Borden
2.4
1.2E + 02
23
1.8
0.6
26.4
|
Phenolic and
|
1″ 9501 E
|
Glass WUCS
|
5901A
5901
Borden
2.4
1.2E + 02
21
1.9
0.5
24.7
|
Phenolic and
|
0.75″
|
Advantex
|
9501 WUCS
|
618AL
GL618 and
Rohm & Haas
2.1
1.0E + 02
16
1.8
0.3
23.7
|
0.75″
|
Advantex
|
9501 WUCS
|
618EL
GL618 and 1″
Rohm & Haas
2.2
1.1E + 02
17
1.9
0.4
24.6
|
9501 E Glass
|
WUCS
|
618EL
GL618 and
Rohm & Haas
2.3
1.1E + 02
17
1.9
0.4
19.3
|
50% 1″ E
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
618E
GL618 and 1″
Rohm & Haas
2.4
1.1E + 02
17
2.0
0.4
21.1
|
E
|
WUCS/Chopped
|
893/Uni 377
|
Roving
|
618L
Low GL618 on
Rohm & Haas
2.8
1.3E + 02
32
1.9
0.9
26.1
|
9501 1″ WUCS
|
618H
High GL618
Rohm & Haas
3.7
1.8E + 02
50
1.8
1.8
28.3
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
2780L
2780 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
2.4
1.1E + 02
21
1.9
0.5
20.4
|
Low Binder
|
Content on
|
1″ 9501 Wet
|
Chop
|
2780H
2780 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
3.4
1.6E + 02
41
2.0
1.4
21.2
|
High Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501 and 50%
|
Chopped 893
|
2780L
2780 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
2.6
1.3E + 02
23
2.0
0.6
18.1
|
Low Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501 and 50%
|
Chopped 893
|
720L
720 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
2.6
1.3E + 02
30
1.8
0.8
30.4
|
Low Binder
|
on 1″ 9501
|
WUCS
|
720L
720 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
2.7
1.3E + 02
29
1.9
0.8
26.5
|
Low Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
720H
720 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
3.4
1.6E + 02
41
2.0
1.4
29.1
|
High Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX24VL
Dow DX31524
Dow
2.2
1.0E + 02
16
1.8
0.3
22.3
|
V-Low Binder
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
DX24VL
Dow DX31524
Dow
2.3
1.1E + 02
14
2.0
0.3
19.9
|
V-Low Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX24M
Dow DX31524
Dow
2.5
1.2E + 02
20
2.0
0.5
20.3
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
D280VL
Dow 280 V-
Dow
2.1
1.0E + 02
13
1.8
0.3
22.9
|
Low Binder
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
D280VL
Dow 280 V-
Dow
2.3
1.1E + 02
12
2.0
0.3
19.8
|
Low Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
D280M
Dow 280 on
Dow
2.4
1.2E + 02
18
2.0
0.4
23.2
|
50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX49VL
Dow DX31549
Dow
2.2
1.1E + 02
17
1.8
0.4
25.0
|
V-Low Binder
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
DX49VL
Dow DX31549
Dow
2.3
1.1E + 02
15
2.0
0.3
22.8
|
V-Low Binder
|
on 50% 1″
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX49M
Dow DX31549
Dow
2.6
1.3E + 02
23
2.0
0.6
26.4
|
Binder on
|
50% 1″
|
9501/Chopped
|
893
|
|
TABLE 9B
|
|
Frazier Air
Tensile
CaO
Hot H
2
O
|
Binder
Binder
Permeability
Strength
Retention
Retention
MD/CD
|
Material
Description
Manufacturer
(ft3/min/ft2)
(pli)
(%)
(%)
Comments
|
|
|
PVC
PVC Scrim -
1600
56
75
0/90
|
0/90 PVC/E-
Roving
|
Glass Tows
Orientation
|
(60% LOI)
|
Roofing Mat
Portland
830
38
63
Oriented
|
Wet Mat
|
3500
Enterprise
National
990
8
87-116
96
Oriented
|
Mat with
Starch or
Hybrid
|
Wucs/Chopped
Air Products
Mat
|
Roving with
|
EVA Binder
|
5901E
5901
Borden
840
21
94
59
Random
|
Phenolic and
Wet Mat
|
1″ 9501 E
|
Glass WUCS
|
5901A
5901
Borden
700
18
53
48
Random
|
Phenolic and
Wet Mat
|
0.75″
|
Advantex
|
9501 WUCS
|
618AL
GL618 and
Rohm & Haas
670
18
111
73
Random
|
0.75″
Wet Mat
|
Advantex
|
9501 WUCS
|
618EL
GL618 and 1″
Rohm & Haas
760
25
104
97
Random
|
9501 E Glass
Wet Mat
|
WUCS
|
618EL
GL618 and
Rohm & Haas
1000
23
104
Random
|
50% 1″ E
Hybrid
|
9501/50%
Mat
|
Chopped 893
|
618E
GL618 and 1″
Rohm & Haas
970
41
98
MD Uni +
|
E WUCS/
Random
|
Chopped 893/
Hybrid
|
Uni 377
|
Roving
|
618L
Low GL618 on
Rohm & Haas
730
41
91
Random
|
9501 1″ WUCS
Wet Mat
|
618H
High GL618
Rohm & Haas
630
49
101
Random
|
on 9501 1″
Wet Mat
|
WUCS
|
2780L
2780 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
810
10
125
Random
|
Low Binder
Wet Mat
|
Content on
|
1″ 9501 Wet
|
Chop
|
2780H
2780 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
830
17
89
Random
|
High Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501 and 50%
|
Chopped 893
|
2780L
2780 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
930
10
101
Random
|
Low Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501 and 50%
|
Chopped 893
|
720L
720 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
780
12
86
Random
|
Low Binder
Wet Mat
|
on 1″ 9501
|
WUCS
|
720L
720 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
840
13
63
Random
|
Low Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
720H
720 Acrylic
Rohm & Haas
790
19
99
Random
|
High Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX24VL
Dow DX31524
Dow
750
23
94
Random
|
V-Low Binder
Wet Mat
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
DX24VL
Dow DX31524
Dow
910
18
88
Random
|
V-Low Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX24M
Dow DX31524
Dow
840
24
91
Random
|
on 50% 1″
Hybrid
|
9501/50%
Mat
|
Chopped 893
|
D280VL
Dow 280 V-
Dow
850
18
93
Random
|
Low Binder
Wet Mat
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
D280VL
Dow 280 V-
Dow
1000
12
88
Random
|
Low Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
D280M
Dow 280 on
Dow
1000
16
88
Random
|
50% 1″
Hybrid
|
9501/50%
Mat
|
Chopped 893
|
DX49VL
Dow DX31549
Dow
810
17
56
Random
|
V-Low Binder
Wet Mat
|
on 9501 1″
|
WUCS
|
DX49VL
Dow DX31549
Dow
960
10
73
Random
|
V-Low Binder
Hybrid
|
on 50% 1″
Mat
|
9501/50%
|
Chopped 893
|
DX49M
Dow DX31549
Dow
940
20
85
Random
|
Binder on
Hybrid
|
50% 1″
Mat
|
9501/Chopped
|
893
|
|
Tables 9A and 9B illustrate that the combination of strands
18
,
20
, generally maintain or improve the Frazier Air Permeability of the various systems without significantly adversely affecting mechanical properties such as CaO percent retention and hot water retention. Tables also indicate that tensile strength may be affected as the ratio of wet use chop strands
18
to dry use strands
20
decreases. This is believed to be a result of the dry use strands
20
forming additional logs in the network
14
, which increase Frazier Air Permeability but decrease tensile strength of the network
14
.
The mat
10
formed in
FIG. 3
above may then be applied to form a cement backerboard
110
in a conventional method such as the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,284,980 to Dinkel, which is herein incorporated by reference and described below in
FIGS. 4-9
.
Referring now to
FIG. 4-6
, into a form
120
of a size of the desired cement backerboard
110
panel, a layer of wet formed permeable mat
10
is laid. A slurry
122
containing hydraulic cement of a suitable consistency to permit penetration thereof through the openings in the open permeable mat
10
is applied, as from the traveling supply pipe
121
. The amount of cement slurry
122
introduced is sufficient to cover the mat
10
completely so that substantially all the network
14
is immersed or embedded; the slurry penetrates the openings in the fibers
18
,
20
and optional rovings
22
and fills them so that the mat
10
is enveloped on both sides. Normally this is only a light envelopment, although an excess is sometimes needed where the aggregate in the core is large and the boundary surface presented by the core is very rough.
In the next step, as shown in
FIG. 7
, the core mixture
124
of aggregate and hydraulic cement is poured into the form
120
; the water content is normally kept on the low side within the range for best strength development in the concrete. A typical mix of the core mixture
124
is three volumes of light weight aggregate, one volume Portland cement and three-fourths volume of water. The core mixture
124
is then rodded off flush with the top of the form
120
, as shown in
FIG. 7
, at the top boundary of the core mixture
124
some depressions will usually be present due to the openings between aggregate particles, to voids from the air entrainment or other cause, resulting from the coarse nature of the core mixture
124
composition.
Referring to
FIG. 8
, a layer of wet formed permeable mat
10
is laid over the top of the core mixture
124
. The thickness of the mat
10
ordinarily is so slight that it does not add materially to the thickness of the core
124
.
As shown in
FIG. 9
, the last layer of hydraulic cement slurry
122
′ is poured over the mat
10
from traveling supply pipe
121
, or applied by other suitable means. The slurry
122
′ penetrates the openings in the mat
10
and also into the voids, openings or surface irregularities at the upper boundary surface of core
124
. Sufficient slurry
122
′ is deposited to penetrate and fill the openings and voids in the core
124
surface, to fill the openings in the fibers
18
,
20
and to lightly cover the mat
10
, or at least be flush with its outer surface; it is then rodded or otherwise leveled. The mat
10
is normally kept as close to the ultimate surface of the finished panel as possible inasmuch as the maximum benefit and greatest strength is thereby realized from the fiber strands
18
,
20
.
After the composite panel
110
is prepared it is left in the form
120
for sufficient time to effect initial cure, or complete cure if desired; the use of a plastic film covering to retain moisture or the use of steam curing is advantageous.
The cement backerboards
110
formed according to the present invention offer many advantages over known PVC glass scrims. These backerboards
110
offer economical advantages in that the mat
10
be formed in a single operation and requires less binder
16
material than known scrim systems. Further, the backerboards
110
formed offer superior decorative finishes by preventing sink marks and pitting.
In addition, the present invention offers improved cement impregnation because the permeable mat
10
formed is not a completely random network of wet and dry chop strands
18
,
20
, and optional rovings
22
, thereby giving a mat
10
with a higher degree of openness as measured by Frazier air permeability as compared with some known systems. Further, permeability to cement impregnation may be adjusted by simply altering the ratio of wet chop strands
18
to dry chop strands
20
in the mat
10
, which in turn affects the ultimate physical properties such as tensile strength within the cement backerboards
110
.
While the invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
Claims
- 1. A wet formed permeable mat for use in a cement backerboard comprising:a randomly oriented open mesh glass filament network comprising approximately a mixture of a plurality of wet use chop strands and a plurality of city chop glass fiber strands, wherein said plurality of wet use chop strands and said plurality of dry chop glass fiber strands each have lengths between approximately 0.75 and 1.5 inches and wherein the ratio by weight of said plurality of wet use chop stands and said plurality of dry use chop strands within said mixture is between approximately 3:1 and 1:3 and wherein a number of said dry chop fiber strands form loss in said network; and an alkaline resistant binder.
- 2. The permeable mat of claim 1, wherein said randomly oriented open mesh glass filament network further comprises a plurality of unidirectional rovings, said unidirectional roving; comprising approximately 20 to 50 percent by weight of said randomly oriented open mesh glass filament network.
- 3. The permeable mat of claim 1, wherein said alkaline resistant binder comprises between approximately 20 and 50 percent by weight of the wet formed permeable mat.
- 4. The permeable mat of claim 1, wherein said alkaline resistant binder is selected from the group consisting of phenolic binders, melamine binders, acrylic binders, styrene-acrylate binders, styrene butadiene binders, and ethylene vinyl acetate binders.
- 5. The permeable mat of claim 1, wherein said alkaline resistant binder comprises Borden Chemical's 590.1 phenolic binder.
- 6. The permeable mat of claim 1, wherein said alkaline resistant binder comprises Rohm end Hans' GL618 acrylic copolymer binder.
US Referenced Citations (26)