Wet-Resistant Fluoride Red Phosphor and Preparation and Application thereof, and White Light LED Device

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20240279544
  • Publication Number
    20240279544
  • Date Filed
    February 21, 2024
    11 months ago
  • Date Published
    August 22, 2024
    5 months ago
Abstract
The present disclosure relates to the field of inorganic non-metallic optoelectronic functional materials, and discloses wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor and preparation and application thereof, and a white light LED device. The fluoride red phosphor is a core-shell structure: the core is Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor, and the chemical structural formula is A2B1-xF6:xMn4+, herein A is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs, B is at least one of Ti, Si, Ge, Zr, and Sn, and 0≤x≤0.4; and the shell is a cubic perovskite-type compound, and the chemical structural formula is CMgF3, herein C is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs. The present disclosure uses CMgF3 generated as a coating waterproof layer, to form the A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure of which the surface is coated by CMgF3, and a wet-resistant problem of the fluoride red phosphor is overcome.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to the field of inorganic non-metallic optoelectronic functional materials, in particular to wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor and preparation and application thereof, and a white light light-emitting diode (LED) device serving as a display backlight source.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

At present, liquid crystal displays mainly use white light LEDs as backlight source. This type of the white light LEDs is fabricated by mainly packaging blue light LED chips in combination with red and green phosphors. For white light LED devices applied to display backlight sources, the emission spectra of the phosphor is narrower, and it is more beneficial to improve the color gamut range and color contrast of display, so that images displayed are more vivid and bright.


In order to meet the needs of liquid crystal displays and high-end lighting applications, a large number of scholars develop Mn4+ activated fluoride red phosphor in recent years. The Mn4+ activated fluoride red phosphor may be effectively excited by the blue light emitted by the LED chips, and it has the advantages such as narrowband red emission, high quantum efficiency, good thermal stability, and simple synthesis method. The d-d orbital electron forbidden transition of Mn4+ may emit a narrow band spectra, which may well meet the needs of display applications. The fluoride compounds have low phonon energy and thus have high efficiency in energy conversion. At present, the reported Mn4+ activated fluoride red phosphors mainly include fluorosilicate (K2, Na2, KNa, Ba, and Zn) SiF6:Mn4+, fluorogermanate (Na2, K2, and Ba) GeF6:Mn4+, fluorostannate (K2, Na2, and Cs2) SnF6·H2O:Mn4+, and fluorotitanate (K2, Na2, Cs, and Ba) TiF6:Mn4+ and other systems. Herein two materials, K2SiF6:Mn4+ and K2GeF6:Mn4+, are commercially applied already. However, all Mn4+ activated fluoride red phosphor has a key technical challenge of poor wet resistance. Once the Mn4+ activated fluoride red phosphors contacted with water and oxygen in the environment, a layer of black MnO2 is formed on the surface of the phosphors, resulting in the luminescence efficiency of the phosphors is greatly reduced. In order to overcome this technical challenge, there is an urgent need to develop a technical means to improve the wet resistance of the fluoride red phosphor, or to develop high-efficiency fluoride red phosphor with wet resistance.


In order to make the fluoride phosphors achieve the well waterproof effect, a common way that has been adopted was by coating one or more layers of inorganic and organic substances on the surface of phosphor particles. By taking this measure, researchers make many attempts to improve the waterproof performance of the fluoride phosphor, and there are currently two mainstream surface modification methods.


One method is to construct a core-shell structure, and the surface of the phosphor is coated with a layer of an inorganic substance or an organic substance so as to achieve a purpose of isolating water molecules in the environment. For example:

    • a document (Zhou Y. Y., et. al., ACSAppl.Mater.Interfaces2018, 10, 880-889) reports that a layer of octadecyltrimethoxysilane (ODTMS) is attached to the surface of K2TiF6:Mn4+ (KTF) phosphor, it is dispersed in water for 2 h, and 84.3% of the initial luminescence intensity is retained;
    • a document (Li Y. L., et. al., J. Lumin., 2021, 234, 117968) reports that the surface of K2SiF6:Mn4+ (KSF) is coated with a layer of a K2SiF6 raw material without Mn4+, to form a KSF@K2SiF6 core-shell structure, it is soaked in water for 300 min, and the luminescence intensity maintains 88% of the initial intensity;
    • a document (Fang M. H., et. al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 29233-29237) reports that an oleic acid (OA) is used as a bridge, to form a KTF@OA@SiO2 double-layer core-shell structure on the surface of KTF, and it has the better water resistance;
    • a document (Fang Z. Y., et. al., Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol, 2021, 18, 1106-1113) reports that the surface of KTF is coated with SrF2 as a waterproof layer, and a document (Yu Y, et. al., Ceram. Int., 2021, 47, 33172-33179) reports that the surface of KTF is coated with CaF2 as a waterproof layer; and
    • a document (Dong Q. Z., et. al., Mater. Res. Bull., 2019, 115, 98-104) reports that the surface of KTF is coated with CaF2 as a waterproof layer, which significantly improves the wet resistance of the phosphor.


Another method is surface modification, means such as acid reduction or ion exchange is used, to reduce the concentration of Mn4+ on the surface of phosphor particles and prevent the occurrence of the browning effect. For example:

    • a document (Wan P. P., et. al., Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 426, 131350.) and a document (Luo P. L., et, al., Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 435, 134951) report that methods of surface passivation and ion exchange are used, a strategy of reduction assisted surface recrystallization is used for surface reconstruction, and after boiling in water, the quantum efficiency (QE) is 96.68%;
    • a document (Zhou Y. Y., et. al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 6, 1802006) reports that H2O2 is used for surface passivation; and
    • a document (Liu Y., et. al., Ceram. Int., 2022, 46, 18281-18286) reports that H2O2 is also used to passivate the surface of the fluoride phosphor, which greatly improves the wet resistance of the phosphor.


Although these technologies may improve the waterproof performance to a certain extent, it still may not completely overcome the wet resistance problem of the fluoride red phosphor, and it is urgent to find a new water-resistant surface substance and develop a new surface coating technology.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A purpose of the present disclosure is to provide wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor and preparation and application thereof, and a white light LED device serving as a display backlight source in response to the deficiencies of existing technologies. The present disclosure uses CMgF3 generated as a coating waterproof layer, to form an A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure of which the surface is coated by CMgF3, and a wet-resistant problem of the fluoride red phosphor is overcome.


In order to achieve the above purpose, a first aspect of the present disclosure provides wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor, and the fluoride red phosphor is a core-shell structure:

    • the core is Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor, and the chemical structural formula is A2B1-xF6:xMn4+, herein A is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs, B is at least one of Ti, Si, Ge, Zr, and Sn, and 0≤x≤0.4; and
    • the shell is a cubic perovskite-type compound, and the chemical structural formula is CMgF3, herein C is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.005-1.0.


According to the present disclosure, preferably A is at least one of Na and K, B is at least one of Ti and Si, and C is at least one of Na and K.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, or 1.0, which is set as x all over the document.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the fluoride red phosphor is K2TiF6: 0.08Mn4+@KMgF3, the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the fluoride red phosphor is K2SiF6: 0.08Mn4+@ KMgF3, the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the fluoride red phosphor is K2TiF6: 0.08Mn4+@NaMgF3, the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2.


In the present disclosure, “@” means the surface of substance before it is coated with the substance behind it. For example, “K2TiF6: 0.08Mn4+@KMgF3” means that the surface of K2TiF6: 0.08Mn4+ is coated with KMgF3.


In the present disclosure, as a preferred scheme, the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor is prepared by a means of secondary crystallization assisted with ion exchange.


A second aspect of the present disclosure provides a preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor, including the following steps:

    • S1: CHF2 aqueous solution and Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution are prepared, herein C is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs;
    • S2: the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor is mixed with the CHF2 aqueous solution and it is stirred uniformly, to obtain mixed solution;
    • S3: the mixed solution is continuously stirred, the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution is dropwise added into the mixed solution, and after dropwise adding, stirring, solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying are performed sequentially, to obtain A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface is coated with CMgF3; and
    • S4: the A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface is coated with CMgF3 is soaked in water, and the solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying are performed, to obtain the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the molar concentration of the CHF2 aqueous solution is 0.001-10 mol/L.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the molar concentration of the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution is 0.001-10 mol/L.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the usage amount ratio of the CHF2 aqueous solution, the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution, and the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor is (0.01-30) L: (0.01-10) L: 1 g.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the molar amount of the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor is 0.001-0.40 mol.


According to the present disclosure, preferably in Step S2, the stirring rate is 50-1200 rpm, and the stirring time is 0-60 min.


According to the present disclosure, preferably in Step S3,

    • the stirring rate of the continuously stirring is 50-1200 rpm;
    • the stirring rate after the dropwise adding is 50-1200 rpm, and the stirring time is 0-60 min; and
    • the dripping rate is 1-90 seconds/drop.


In the present disclosure, the mode of the solid-liquid separating includes suction filtration, and the washing includes repeatedly washing a filter cake with ethanol to neutral.


According to the present disclosure, preferably in Step S4, the soaking time is 1-60 h.


According to the present disclosure, preferably in Step S4, the soaking time is 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, or 60 h.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the preparation method including the following steps:

    • S1: preparing KHF2 aqueous solution and the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution;
    • S2: mixing K2TiF6:xMn4+ with the KHF2 aqueous solution and stirring for 30 min, to obtain mixed solution;
    • S3: continuously stirring the mixed solution, dropwise adding the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution into the mixed solution, and after dropwise adding, performing stirring for 30 min, performing solid-liquid separating, washing, and performing drying at 70° C., to obtain K2TiF6:xMn4+@KMgF3; and
    • S4: soaking the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in water for 24 h, and performing the solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying, to obtain the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.


In the present disclosure, as a preferred scheme, the coating process of the present disclosure is that in potassium hydrogen fluoride solution, Mg2+, K+, and F ions form a KMgF3 precipitate on the surface of K2TiF6:Mn4+ phosphor particles, and the entire phosphor particles are coated, to form a waterproof layer and block the contact between [MnF6]2+ groups on the surface of the phosphor and the water in the environment, thereby the wet resistance of the phosphor is greatly improved. After the coating is completed, K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor obtained is soaked in water for 24 h. The KMgF3 shell layer on the surface of the phosphor, which is difficult to dissolve in water, undergoes recrystallization in water, to form K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with regular surface morphology and water resistance. As shown in FIG. 1:

    • (1) K2TiF6:Mn4+ phosphor is mixed with the potassium hydrogen fluoride solution and it is stirred for 30 min, to obtain mixed solution;
    • (2) the mixed solution is continuously stirred, the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution is dropwise added into the mixed solution at a constant dripping rate, at this time, KMgF3 slowly grows on the surface of K2TiF6:Mn4+ phosphor particles, and after dropwise adding, stirring for 30 min, solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying (70° C.) are performed sequentially, to obtain K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor of which the surface morphology presents an irregular sphere, as shown in FIG. 1(2); and
    • (3) the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor is soaked in water for 24 h, KMgF3 on the surface of the phosphor is recrystallized in water, and the surface morphology becomes relatively regular and smooth, as shown in FIG. 1(3), and the solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying are performed, to obtain the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.


A third aspect of the present disclosure provides an application of the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor used as a red component of a white light LED device serving as a display backlight source.


A fourth aspect of the present disclosure provides a white light LED device serving as a display backlight source, and the white light LED device includes a red component, a green component, and a blue component; and

    • the red component is the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.


According to the present disclosure, preferably the green component is a green phosphor with a peak emission wavelength of 520-560 nm and a half peak width of less than 35 nm, preferably β-SIALON green phosphor; and the blue component is an InGaN blue-emitting chip.


The beneficial effects of the technical schemes of the present disclosure are as follows.


The present disclosure uses a simple co-precipitation method to complete the coating of CMgF3 layer on fluoride phosphor particles in CHF2 aqueous solution, the usage amount of the hydrofluoric acid is reduced, the synthesis hazard is reduced, and the generated CMgF3 is used as the coating waterproof layer, to form the A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure of which the surface is coated by CMgF3. The coating process is simple, it is environment-friendly, resources are saved, and it is suitable for large-scale industrial applications.


The absorbance, internal quantum efficiency, and external quantum efficiency of the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor which is not soaked in water, are 71.22%, 83.48%, and 59.47%, and after being soaked in water for 24 h, it still maintains 98.15%, 96.55%, and 94.8% of the initial values. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor prepared by the present disclosure still has the good luminescent performance even when soaked in pure water. The absorbance, internal quantum efficiency, and external quantum efficiency of the A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor, of which the surface is coated by CMgF3, after being soaked in water for 24 h are 72.56%, 86.46%, and 62.73%, respectively.


The present disclosure uses the A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ fluoride red phosphor as the core and uses CMgF3 as the surface coating layer substance, the coated phosphor is soaked in the aqueous solution for a long time and then filtered out for use. This process is used to thoroughly overcome the problem that the Mn4+ activated fluoride red phosphor is afraid of wet.


Other features and advantages of the present disclosure are partially described in detail in subsequent specific implementation modes.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

By describing exemplary implementation modes of the present disclosure in more detail in combination with drawings, the above and other purposes, features, and advantages of the present disclosure may become more apparent, herein in the exemplary implementation modes of the present disclosure, the same reference signs typically represent the same components.



FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a preparation process (coating process and recrystallization process) of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor provided in Example 1 of the present disclosure (herein, “KTF @KMgF3” is K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3).



FIG. 2 shows a photo of K2TiF6:Mn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor, of which the surface is coated by KMgF3, soaked in water for 24 h in Example 1 of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 shows X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios in Examples 1-5 of the present disclosure. (Herein, “2 Theta (°)” represents an XRD scanning angle, similarly hereinafter.)



FIG. 4 shows emission spectra of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 1-5 of the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 shows excitation spectra of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 1-5 of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 shows XRD Patterns of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different soaking times in Example 1, and 6-9 of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 7 (a), (c), (e), and (g) respectively shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of K2TiF6:Mn4+ uncoated in Example 1, an SEM image of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1, an SEM image of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 1, and an SEM image of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 60 h in Example 1.



FIGS. 7 (b), (d), (f), and (h) respectively shows an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+ uncoated in Example 1, an EDS elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1, an EDS elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 1, and an EDS elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 60 h in Example 1. Herein, Mn Kα1 represents a characteristic X-ray signal released by excited electrons in an L layer outside an Mn element atomic nucleus transitioning to a K layer, resulting in energy loss, and represents a signal of the Mn element detected by an energy spectrometer; and Mg Kα1_2 represents a characteristic X-ray signal released by excited electrons in an L layer outside an Mg element atomic nucleus transitioning to a K layer, resulting in energy loss, and represents a signal of the Mg element detected by the energy spectrometer.



FIG. 8 shows emission spectra of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different soaking times in Examples 1, and 6-9.



FIG. 9 shows excitation spectra of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with the different soaking times in Examples 1, and 6-9.



FIG. 10 shows emission spectra of samples in Examples 10-17 for a first orthogonal experiment.



FIG. 11 shows emission spectra of samples in Examples 18-25 for the first orthogonal experiment.



FIG. 12 shows emission spectra of samples in Examples 10-17 for a second orthogonal experiment.



FIG. 13 shows emission spectra of samples in Examples 18-25 for the second orthogonal experiment.



FIG. 14 shows XRD Patterns of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios in Examples 26-30. (“KSF @KMgF3” is K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3.)



FIG. 15 (a)-(f) shows an SEM image of K2SiF6:Mn4+ uncoated in Example 26 ((a)-(b)), an SEM image of K2SiF6:Mn4+@ KMgF3 in Example 26 ((c)-(d)), and an SEM image of K2SiF6:Mn4+@ KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 26 ((e)-(f)).



FIG. 16 shows emission spectra of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 26-30.



FIG. 17 shows excitation spectra of the K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 26-30.



FIG. 18 shows XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios in Examples 31-35.



FIG. 19 shows emission spectra of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 31-35.



FIG. 20 shows excitation spectra of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 31-35.



FIG. 21 (a) shows a spectra of a white light LED device packaged with K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1.



FIG. 21 (b) shows a comparison diagram of a CIE color gamut diagram of the white light LED device in Example 36 and a standard color gamut of the National Television System Committee (the United States). (Herein, NTSC is the standard color gamut of the National Television System Committee.



FIG. 22 shows a thermal steady-state luminous flux attenuation curve of the white light LED device packaged with K2TiF6:Mn4+ (1), K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 but not soaked in water (2), and K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 after being soaked in water for 24 h (3).



FIG. 23 shows a thermal steady-state voltage attenuation curve of the white light LED device packaged with K2TiF6:Mn4+ (1), K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 but not soaked in water (2), and K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 after being soaked in water for 24 h (3).



FIG. 24 shows XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface is coated by KMgF3 in Example 1.



FIG. 25 shows XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@CaF2 and K2TiF6:Mn4.



FIG. 26 shows XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@SrF2 and K2TiF6:Mn4.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Preferred embodiments of the present disclosure are described in more detail below. Although the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure are described below, it should be understood that the present disclosure may be implemented in various forms and should not be limited by the embodiments described herein. On the contrary, these embodiments are provided to make the present disclosure more thorough and complete, and fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art.


In the following examples:

    • Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor was prepared by a means of secondary crystallization assisted with ion exchange;
    • KHF2 was purchased from Shanghai SanAiSi Reagent Co., Ltd., and the analytical purity AR is 99%;
    • Mg(NO3)2·6H2O was purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, and the analytical purity AR is 99%; and
    • anhydrous ethanol was purchased from Sinopharm Group Chemical reagent Co., Ltd, and the analytical purity is 99.7%.


Example 1

This example provided wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3, and the fluoride red phosphor was a core-shell structure;

    • the core was K2TiF6:Mn4+, herein the doping concentration of Mn4+ was x=0.08; and
    • the shell was KMgF3.


The molar ratio of the shell to the core (coating ratio) was 0.2.


A preparation method for the above wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor included the following steps:

    • S1: 2 mol/L KHF2 aqueous solution and 1 mol/L Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution were prepared, herein C was at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs;
    • S2: the above K2TiF6:Mn4+ (the molar amount was 0.01 mol) was mixed with 20 mL of the KHF2 aqueous solution and it was stirred at 400 rpm for 30 min, to obtain mixed solution;
    • S3: the mixed solution was continuously stirred (400 rpm), the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution was dropwise added into the mixed solution (60 seconds/drop), and after dropwise adding, stirring (400 rpm) for 30 min, suction-filtering, washing with anhydrous ethanol to neutral, and drying (70° C.) were performed sequentially, to obtain K2TiF6:Mn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface was coated with KMgF3; and
    • S4: the K2TiF6:Mn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface was coated with KMgF3 was soaked in water for 24 h (as shown in FIG. 2), and the suction-filtering, washing, and drying (70° C.) were performed, to obtain the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.


Examples 2-5

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor was respectively provided in Examples 2-5:


K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3.


The difference between Examples 2-5 and Example 1 was that the molar ratios (coating ratio) of shell KMgF3 to core K2TiF6:Mn4+ in Examples 2-5 were 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 respectively.


As shown in FIG. 3, XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios in Examples 1-5 were presented, and it might be seen that:

    • the uncoated K2TiF6:Mn4+ corresponded well with the standard PDF #08-0488 of K2TiF6.


After being coated, as shown in a rectangular box in the figure, the characteristic peak of KMgF3 appeared at diffraction angles of 31.63° and 45.42°, which was consistent with the main peak of the standard PDF #18-1033 of KMgF3, corresponding to (110) and (200) crystal planes of KMgF3 respectively. When the molar ratio of K2TiF6:Mn4+ to Mg2+ was increased from 0.2 to 1.0, the relative peak intensity of the characteristic peak was gradually increased, it was indicated that the coating thickness was increased. However, the main peak of K2TiF6:Mn 4+ was not shifted, it was indicated that the generation of KMgF3 did not affect the basic structure of K2TiF6.


As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, emission spectra and excitation spectra of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 1-5 were presented, and it might be seen that: as the coating ratio was gradually increased, the luminescence intensity of K2TiF6:Mn4+@ xKMgF3 phosphor was gradually decreased.


As shown in Table 1, it was the relative peak intensity and relative integral intensity of the emission spectra in FIG. 4. According to Table 1, when the coating ratio was 0.2, the relative peak intensity was closest to the uncoated K2TiF6:Mn4+, and reaches 99.24%. When the coating ratio was increased to 1.0, the peak intensity was 90.7% of the initial phosphor. Therefore, the surface modification was performed by adopting the scheme provided by the present disclosure, the wet resistance of the phosphor might reach up to 99.24%, almost without reducing the initial luminescent performance of the phosphor.










TABLE 1








Coating ratio














0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
















Peak intensity
276.2
274.1
273.1
258.1
257.9
250.5


Integral intensity
3023.157
3033.092
3010.387
2862.833
2854.629
2784.897









Examples 6-9

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor was respectively provided in Examples 6-9:


K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3.


The difference between Examples 6-9 and Example 1 was that: in Step S4, the K2TiF6:Mn 4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface was coated with KMgF3 was soaked in water for 12 h, 36 h, 48 h, and 60 h respectively.


As shown in FIG. 6, XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different soaking times in Examples 1 and 6-9 were presented, and it might be seen that: the relative peak intensity of the characteristic peak at the diffraction angles of 31.63° and 45.42° was not significantly decreased with the increase of the soaking time, it was indicated that the solubility of the KMgF3 shell layer was very low and was prone to recrystallization.


As shown in FIGS. 7 (a), (c), (e), and (g), an SEM image of uncoated K2TiF6:Mn4+ in Example 1, an SEM image of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1, an SEM image of K2TiF6:Mn 4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 1, and an SEM image of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 60 h in Example 9 were presented respectively, and it might be seen that:

    • the surface morphology of the uncoated K2TiF6:Mn4+ was regular and flat;
    • the surface of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 that was coated but not soaked in water was irregular; and
    • the surface of the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 particles soaked in water for 24 h and 60 h gradually became regular and flat, corresponding to the changes in the surface morphology of the phosphor particles in FIG. 1.


As shown in FIGS. 7 (b), (d), (f), and (h), an EDS elemental mapping of uncoated K2TiF6:Mn 4+ in Example 1, an EDS elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1, an EDS elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 1, and an EDS elemental mapping of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 60 h in Example 9 were presented respectively, and it might be seen that:

    • when it was not coated, there was no a signal of Mg on the surface of the particles; and
    • after being coated and soaked in water for a certain period of time, there was a signal of Mg presented. Corresponding to FIG. 1, KMgF3 was grown on the surface of the phosphor particles.


As shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, emission spectra and excitation spectra of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different soaking times in Examples 1 and 6-9 were presented, and it might be seen that: as the soaking time was increased, the relative peak intensity and relative integral intensity of the emission spectra were gradually increased, reach the maximum after 24 h of soaking, and then gradually became stabilized without increasing or decreasing. This phenomenon corresponded to the SEM image results of the coated phosphor soaked in water for the different times shown in FIGS. 7 (a), (c), (e), and (g). The surface morphology of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor that was coated but not soaked in water was irregular, which might affect the luminescent performance of the phosphor.


As shown in Table 2, it was the relative peak intensity and relative integral intensity of the emission spectra in FIG. 8. From Table 2, it might be seen that when the soaking time was 0, its luminescence intensity was the lowest, and after being soaked in water for a certain period of time, the luminescence intensity was gradually increased. This was because the KMgF3 shell layer on the particle surface, which was difficult to dissolve in water, underwent recrystallization in water, and the surface tended to be regular and flat. Finally, the luminescence intensity of the phosphor was returned to the same level as K2TiF6:Mn4+ phosphor which was not coated but did not have the wet resistance.










TABLE 2








Time














0 h
12 h
24 h
36 h
48 h
60 h
















Peak intensity
270.7
281
295.5
297.2
296.4
295


Integral intensity
3009.354
3111.815
3343.793
3299.313
3297.482
3278.201









As shown in Table 3, the internal quantum efficiency, absorbance, and external quantum efficiency of K2TiF6:Mn4+ uncoated in Example 1, K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1, and K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 1 were presented. Results showed that the external quantum efficiency of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 coated but not soaked in water was lower than that after being soaked for 24 h, and after being soaked for 24 h, the external quantum efficiency of K2TiF6:Mn4+@ KMgF3 was returned to 94.8% of the initial uncoated K2TiF6:Mn4+.












TABLE 3






Internal

External



quantum

quantum


Sample
efficiency
Absorbance
efficiency


















K2TiF6:Mn4+
86.46%
72.56%
62.73%


K2TiF6:Mn4+ @KMgF3
83.71%
70.81%
59.27%


K2TiF6:Mn4+ @KMgF3-
83.48%
71.22%
59.47%


Soaking for 24 h









Examples 10-25

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor was respectively provided in Examples 10-25:


K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3.


The difference between Examples 10-25 and Example 1 was that:

    • the concentration of KHF2 aqueous solution, the molar amount of K2TiF6:Mn4+ added, the concentration of Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution, the dripping rate of the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution, and stirring rate were different, as shown in Table 5.


Examples 10-25 used Qualitek-4 orthogonal experimental analysis software to design a five-factor four-level orthogonal experiment, as shown in Table 4, the parameters of design range were presented.













TABLE 4





Factor
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4



















KHF2 solution concentration
0.1
1
2
4


(mol/L)


K2TiF6:Mn4+ molar amount (mol)
0.001
0.005
0.01
0.02


Mg(NO3)2 solution concentration
0.1
1
2
4


(mol/L)


Dripping rate (seconds/drop)
1
30
60
90


Stirring rate (rpm)
50
400
800
1200









In order to ensure the accuracy of experimental results, two experiments were performed. FIGS. 10 and 11 showed emission spectra of samples 10-17 and 18-25 in the first orthogonal experiment respectively; FIGS. 12 and 13 showed emission spectra of samples 10-17 and 18-25 in the second orthogonal experiment respectively; and the average integral intensity of the results of two orthogonal experiments were shown in Table 5.


As shown in Table 6, statistical analysis results of the average integral intensity using the Qualitek-4 orthogonal experimental analysis software were specifically as follows:

    • the optimal solution concentration of KHF2 was 2 mol/L corresponding to level 3;
    • the optimal molar amount of K2TiF6:Mn4+ phosphor added was 0.01 mol corresponding to level 3;
    • the optimal solution concentration of magnesium nitrate was 1 mol/L corresponding to level 2;
    • the optimal dripping rate was 60 s/drop corresponding to level 3; and
    • the optimal stirring rate was 50 r/min corresponding to level 1, and the influencing factor of the stirring rate was relatively low in proportion, and the contribution rate was 2.8% (49.868/1780.729). The uniformity of the solution system during the reaction was considered, so the stirring rate of 400 r/min was used for subsequent experiments.















TABLE 5






KHF2
KTF molar
Mg(NO3)2
Dripping
Stirring
Average



concentration
amount
concentration
rate
rate
integral



(mol/L)
(mol)
(mol/L)
(s/drop)
(rpm)
intensity





















Example 10
0.1
0.001
0.1
1
50
439.867


Example 11
0.1
0.005
1
30
400
442.193


Example 12
0.1
0.01
2
60
800
1540.502


Example 13
0.1
0.02
4
90
1200
494.973


Example 14
1
0.001
1
60
1200
1634.5645


Example 15
1
0.005
0.1
90
800
1879.858


Example 16
1
0.01
4
1
400
2010.5015


Example 17
1
0.02
2
30
50
2204.42


Example 18
2
0.001
2
90
400
2216.7205


Example 19
2
0.005
4
60
50
2206.5955


Example 20
2
0.01
0.1
30
1200
3137.917


Example 21
2
0.02
1
1
800
3378.0465


Example 22
4
0.001
4
30
800
600.322


Example 23
4
0.005
2
1
1200
2210.838


Example 24
4
0.01
1
90
50
2856.107


Example 25
4
0.02
0.1
60
400
2776.64



















TABLE 6






Level

Contribution


Factor
description
Level
value


















KHF2 solution concentration (mol/L)
2
3
857.941


KTF molar amount (mol)
0.01
3
509.377


Mg(NO3)2 solution concentration
1
2
200.848


(mol/L)


Dripping rate (seconds/drop)
60
3
162.696


Stirring rate (rpm)
50
1
49.868









Example 26

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 was provided in this example.


The fluoride red phosphor was a core-shell structure;

    • the core was K2SiF6:Mn4+, herein the doping concentration of Mn4+ was x=0.08; and
    • the shell was KMgF3.


The molar ratio (coating ratio) of the shell to the core was 0.2.


A preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor in this example was the same as that in Example 1.


Examples 27-30

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor was respectively provided in Examples 27-30:


K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3.


The difference between Examples 27-30 and Example 26 was that the molar ratios (coating ratio) of the shell KMgF3 to core K2SiF6:Mn4+ in Examples 27-30 was 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 respectively.


As shown in FIG. 14, XRD Patterns of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios in Examples 26-30 were presented, and it might be seen that:

    • the uncoated K2SiF6:Mn4+ corresponded well with the standard PDF #75-0694 of K2SiF6.


After being coated, as shown in a rectangular box in the figure, the characteristic peak of KMgF3 appeared at diffraction angles of 31.63° and 45.42°, which was consistent with the main peak of the standard PDF #18-1033 of KMgF3, corresponding to (110) and (200) crystal planes of KMgF3 respectively. When the molar ratio of K2SiF6:Mn4+ to Mg2+ was increased from 0.2 to 1.0, the relative peak intensity of the characteristic peak was gradually increased, it was indicated that the coating thickness was increased. However, the main peak of K2SiF6:Mn 4+ was not shifted, it was indicated that the generation of KMgF3 did not affect the basic structure of K2SiF6.


As shown in FIG. 15 (a)-(f), an SEM image of K2SiF6:Mn4+ uncoated in Example 26 ((a)-(b)), an SEM image of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 26 ((c)-(d)), and an SEM image of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 26 ((e)-(f)) were presented respectively, and it might be seen that:

    • in FIG. 15 (a)-(b), the surface of the uncoated K2SiF6:Mn4+ was relatively smooth, and the phosphor particles were uniformly square in shape;
    • in FIG. 15 (c)-(d), the surface of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 was coated with an uneven shell layer, the particle surface was rough, but it might still be seen that the matrix of the phosphor particles was square; and
    • in FIG. 15 (e)-(f), the rough surface of K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 soaked in water for 24 h in Example 26 became relatively smooth.


As shown in FIGS. 16 and 17, emission spectra and excitation spectra of K2SiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 26-30 were presented, and it might be seen that the decrease in luminescence intensity of the phosphor after being coated and soaked in water for 24 h was not significant compared to the untreated phosphor.


As shown in Table 7, they were the relative peak intensity and relative integral intensity of the emission spectra in FIG. 16. From Table 7, it might be seen that the results were consistent with the changes in luminescence intensity of K2TiF6:Mn4+ after being coated. As the coating ratio was increased, the luminescence intensity was gradually decreased. When x=0.2, wherein x was the molar ration of shell to core, the emission spectra integral intensity of K2SiF6:Mn4+@0.2KMgF3 after being soaked in water for 24 h was 96.15% of the initial K2SiF6:Mn4+. When x=1.0, namely the coating ratio was largest and the shell layer was thickest, the emission spectra integral intensity of K2SiF6:Mn4+@1.0KMgF3 after being soaked in water for 24 h was 87.38% of the initial K2SiF6:Mn4+.










TABLE 7








Coating ratio














0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
















Peak intensity
427.4
411.5
404.5
388.1
387.3
376


Integral intensity
4045.89
3890.19
3832.42
3668.92
3669.51
3535.22









Example 31

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 was provided in this example.


The fluoride red phosphor was a core-shell structure;

    • the core was K2TiF6:Mn4+, which was the same as Example 1; and
    • the shell was NaMgF3.


The molar ratio (coating ratio) of the shell to the core was 0.2.


The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor in this example was the same as that in Example 1.


Examples 32-35

Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor was respectively provided in Examples 32-35:


K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3.


The difference between Examples 32-35 and Example 31 was that the molar ratios (coating ratio) of the shell NaMgF3 to the core K2TiF6:Mn4+ in Examples 32-35 were 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 respectively.


As shown in FIG. 18, XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 phosphor with different coating ratios in Examples 31-35 were presented, and it might be seen that:

    • the diffraction results of K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 corresponded accurately to the K2TiF6 standard PDF card, and the NaMgF3 characteristic peak appeared at the diffraction angle of 47.3°, which corresponded accurately to the strongest peak on its standard PDF card. It was indicated that the coating method successfully synthesizes NaMgF3 and forms a shell layer.


As shown in FIGS. 19 and 20, emission spectra and excitation spectra of K2TiF6:Mn4+@NaMgF3 phosphor with the different coating ratios after being soaked in water for 24 h in Examples 31-35 were presented, and it might be seen that as the coating ratio was increased, the luminescence intensity was gradually decreased. When x=0.2, the integral intensity was 74.3% of the initial K2TiF6:Mn4+, and the waterproof performance was slightly lower than that of the KMgF3 shell. When x=0.8, the peak intensity was 61.5% of the initial K2TiF6:Mn4+.


As shown in Table 8, it was the relative peak intensity and relative integral intensity of the emission spectra in FIG. 19.














TABLE 8





Coating ratio
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8




















Peak intensity
353.6
261.4
233.9
231.5
216.1


Integral intensity
3855.41
2864.35
2553.23
2537.74
2370.15









Example 36

A white light LED device serving as a display backlight source was provided in this example, and the white light LED device included a red component, a green component, and a blue component;

    • the red component was the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor in Example 1;
    • the green component was the β-SIALON:Eu2+ green phosphor; and
    • the blue component was an InGaN blue-emitting chip.


As shown in FIG. 21 (a), it was a spectra of a white light LED device packaged with K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in Example 1. As shown in FIG. 21 (b), it was a comparison diagram of a CIE color gamut diagram of the white light LED device in this example and a standard color gamut of the National Television System Committee. As shown in FIGS. 21 (a) and (b), the color gamut of the white light LED device in this example reaches 105.2% NTSC, and the luminous efficiency was 97.55 I m/W, so it was suitable as the display backlight source.


As shown in FIGS. 22 and 23, it was a thermal steady-state luminous flux attenuation curve and a thermal steady-state voltage attenuation curve of the white light LED device packaged with K2TiF6:Mn4+ (1), K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 but not soaked in water (2), and K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 after being soaked in water for 24 h (3), and it might be seen that: the stability of the device 3 was the best under double 85 test conditions (The temperature is 85 degrees Celsius and the humidity is 85 percent), after 360 seconds of testing, the luminous flux was attenuated to 90.55%, the device voltage was 99.13%, and compared to the device 1, the attenuation amplitude of the effect was significantly smaller.


As shown in Table 9, it was optoelectronic parameters of the devices 1, 2, and 3 under 120 mA current excitation.












TABLE 9






Luminous
Color
Luminous


Number
efficacy (Lm/W)
gamut (NTSC)
efficiency (%)


















1
93.05
105.2%
47.6


2
89.46
105.2%
38.9


3
97.55
105.2%
46.8









Comparative Examples 1-2

In Comparative examples 1-2, alkaline earth metal nitrate solution, Ca2+ and Sr2+, in the same family as Mg was respectively used to replace the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution and dropwise added into the mixed solution for coating treatment, and the other steps were the same as in Example 1. Results were shown in FIGS. 24-26:

    • the coated phosphor showed distinct characteristic peaks of the shell layer substance at the corresponding diffraction angles.


It might be seen from FIG. 24 that the XRD Patterns of K2TiF6:Mn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface was coated by KMgF3 in Example 1 showed the characteristic peak of KMgF3 at diffraction angles of 31.63° and 45.42°;

    • it might be seen from FIG. 25 that the characteristic peak of CaF2 appeared at diffraction angles of 28.27° and 47.00°; and
    • it might be seen from FIG. 26 that the characteristic peak of SrF2 appeared at diffraction angles of 26.57° and 44.12°.


It was indicated that by using the same coating process and using different alkaline earth metal nitrates as the titration solution, only the addition of Mg2+ nitrate solution might generate KMgF3.


Various embodiments of the present disclosure are already described above, and the above description is exemplary, not exhaustive, and is not limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and changes are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without deviating from the scope and spirit of the embodiments described.

Claims
  • 1. Wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor, wherein the fluoride red phosphor is a core-shell structure: the core is Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor, and the chemical structural formula is A2B1-xF6:xMn4+, wherein A is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs, B is at least one of Ti, Si, Ge, Zr, and Sn, and 0≤x≤0.4; andthe shell is a cubic perovskite-type compound, and the chemical structural formula is CMgF3, wherein C is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs.
  • 2. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.005-1.0.
  • 3. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, wherein A is at least one of Na and K, B is at least one of Ti and Si, and C is at least one of Na and K.
  • 4. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, or 1.0.
  • 5. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, wherein the fluoride red phosphor is K2TiF6:0.08Mn4+@KMgF3, the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2.
  • 6. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, wherein the fluoride red phosphor is K2SiF6:0.08Mn4+@ KMgF3, the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2.
  • 7. The wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, wherein the fluoride red phosphor is K2TiF6:0.08Mn4+@NaMgF3, the molar ratio of the shell to the core is 0.2.
  • 8. A preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1, comprising the following steps: S1: preparing CHF2 aqueous solution and Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution, wherein C is at least one of Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs;S2: mixing the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor with the CHF2 aqueous solution and stirring uniformly, to obtain mixed solution;S3: continuously stirring the mixed solution, dropwise adding the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution into the mixed solution, and after dropwise adding, performing stirring, solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying sequentially, to obtain A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface is coated with CMgF3; andS4: soaking the A2B1-xF6:xMn4+ core-shell structure fluoride red phosphor of which the surface is coated with CMgF3 in water, and performing the solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying, to obtain the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.
  • 9. The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 8, wherein, the molar concentration of the CHF2 aqueous solution is 0.001-10 mol/L;the molar concentration of the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution is 0.001-10 mol/L;the usage amount ratio of the CHF2 aqueous solution, the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution, and the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor is (0.01-30) L: (0.01-10) L: 1 g; andthe molar amount of the Mn4+ doped fluoride red phosphor is 0.001-0.40 mol.
  • 10. The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 8, wherein in Step S2, the stirring rate is 50-1200 rpm, and the stirring time is 0-60 min.
  • 11. The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 8, wherein in Step S3, the stirring rate of the continuously stirring is 50-1200 rpm;the stirring rate after the dropwise adding is 50-1200 rpm, and the stirring time is 0-60 min; andthe dripping rate is 1-90 seconds/drop.
  • 12. The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 8, wherein in Step S4, the soaking time is 1-60 h.
  • 13. The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 8, wherein in Step S4, the soaking time is 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, or 60 h.
  • 14. The preparation method for the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 8, wherein the preparation method comprising the following steps: S1: preparing KHF2 aqueous solution and the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution;S2: mixing K2TiF6:xMn4+ with the KHF2 aqueous solution and stirring for 30 min, to obtain mixed solution;S3: continuously stirring the mixed solution, dropwise adding the Mg(NO3)2 aqueous solution into the mixed solution, and after dropwise adding, performing stirring for 30 min, performing solid-liquid separating, washing, and performing drying at 70° C., to obtain K2TiF6:xMn4+@KMgF3; andS4: soaking the K2TiF6:Mn4+@KMgF3 in water for 24 h, and performing the solid-liquid separating, washing, and drying, to obtain the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor.
  • 15. An application of the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1 used as a red component of a white light LED device serving as a display backlight source and a high color rendering and high contrast lighting source.
  • 16. A white light LED device serving as a display backlight source and a high color rendering and high contrast lighting source, wherein the white light LED device comprises a red component, a green component, and a blue component; and the red component is the wet-resistant fluoride red phosphor according to claim 1.
  • 17. The white light LED device according to claim 16, wherein the green component is a green phosphor with a peak emission wavelength of 520-560 nm and a half peak width of less than 35 nm; and the blue component is an InGaN blue-emitting chip.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
202310161936.1 Feb 2023 CN national