Wet products such as wet wipes have many applications. They may be used with small children and infants when changing diapers, they may be used for house hold cleaning tasks, they may be used for cleaning hands, they may be used as a bath tissue, they may be used as by a caregiver to clean a disabled or incontinent adult, or they may be used in and for a whole host of other applications, where it is advantageous to have a wipe or towel that has some moisture in it.
Wet wipes have been traditionally been made in processes in which larger webs of wipes are initially made and than these larger webs are converted into smaller rolls or sheets that can be placed in a dispenser. Embodiments of dispensers are described in application Ser. Nos. 09/565,227 and 09/545,995; in application Ser. Nos. 09/659,307; 09/659,295; 09/660,049; 09/659,311; 09/660,040; 09/659,283; 09/659,284; 09/659,306, filed Sep. 12, 2000; in application Ser. No. 09/748,618, filed Dec. 22, 2000; in application Ser. No. 09/841,323, filed Apr. 24, 2001; in application Ser. No. 09/844,731, filed Apr. 27, 2001; and in application Ser. No. 09/849,935, filed May 4, 2001; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Wet wipes can be any wipe, towel, tissue or sheet like product including natural fibers, synthetic fibers, synthetic material and combinations thereof, that is wet or moist. Examples of wet wipes are disclosed in application Ser. Nos. 09/564,449; 09/564,213; 09/565,125; 09/564,837; 09/564,939; 09/564,531; 09/564,268; 09/564,424; 09/564,780; 09/564,212; 09/565,623 all filed May 4, 2000, and application Ser. No. 09/223,999 entitled Ion-Sensitive Hard Water Dispersible Polymers And Applications Therefor, filed Dec. 31, 1998, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
There is a need for improved methods for making wet wipes, particularly for making rolls of wet wipes. Typically, wet wipes are manufactured as a roll of dry sheets and are then soaked in a wetting solution. Among other disadvantages, this method can lead to undesirable variations in the properties and performance of the wipes. It is desirable to manufacture wet wipes such that the wetting solution and its ingredients are uniformly distributed throughout the roll. It is also desirable to manufacture coreless rolls of wet wipes, which can be more conveniently packaged and sold.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of making wet rolls, comprising providing a web of material; applying a wetting solution to the web to produce a wet web; and winding the wet web into a roll.
These embodiments may further comprise a method wherein the wetting solution is applied at an add-on greater than about 25%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 25% and about 700%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 50% and 400%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 100% and 350%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 150% and 300%; and the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 200% and 250%. These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the web travels at a speed of at least 60 meters per minute; the web travels at a speed of at least 80 meters per minute; the web travels at a speed of at least 150 meters per minute; and the web of material travels at a speed of at least 300 meters per minute. These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the roll is coreless; the web comprises a wet-formed basesheet; the web comprises a non-woven basesheet; the web comprises a water-dispersible binder; the method is performed in an environment which is substantially free of contaminants; and the wetting solution is uniformly distributed in the wet web.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of making wet rolls, comprising providing a web of material from a source; controlling the draw of the web from the source; perforating the web; positioning the perforated web adjacent a wetting apparatus; applying a wetting solution to at least one side of the web with an add-on of at least about 25% to yield a wet web; and winding the wet web into a roll.
These embodiments may further comprise a method wherein the providing comprises obtaining a roll of web material, and unwinding the roll; combining at least two web plies into a single web; and manufacturing a basesheet, and feeding the basesheet to an apparatus for wetting and winding the web. These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the web travels at a speed of at least 60 meters per minute; wherein the wetting solution comprises salt; wherein the positioning, applying, and winding are performed in an environment which is substantially free of contamination; and wherein the roll is coreless.
These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 25% and about 700%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 50% and 400%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 100% and 350%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 150% and 300%; and the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 200% and 250%.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of making a wet coreless roll comprising: a) providing a wet web of material; b) breaking the wet web and forming a cigarette from the leading edge of the break; c) forming a roll of the wet web around the cigarette in a roll forming pocket; d) separating the wet web roll from the web while repeating step b); and e) discharging the separated wet web roll from the roll forming pocket. These embodiments may further comprise perforating the web, and making the break of step b) along a line of perforation.
These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the roll forming pocket comprises a first roller, a second roller, and a third roller. These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the roll forming pocket comprises a first roller, a second roller, and a third roller; the wet web contacting the first roller, the second roller, and the third roller; the first, second and third rollers rotating in the same circular direction; and the second roller rotating in a circular direction opposite from the direction of movement of the wet web. These embodiments may further comprise a method wherein the method is performed in an environment which is substantially free of contaminants; wherein the web travels at a speed of at least 60 meters per minute; and wherein the wet web comprises an add-on of a wetting solution of at least about 25%.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of making wet coreless rolls comprising providing a wet web; winding the wet web into a roll using a roll forming pocket; the roll forming pocket comprising a first roller, a second roller and a third roller; the wet web contacting the first roller, the second roller, and the third roller; the first, second and third rollers rotating in the same direction; and the second roller rotating in a direction opposite from the direction of movement of the wet web; and discharging the wet web roll from the roll forming pocket.
These embodiments may further comprise a method wherein the wet web is made by applying a wetting solution to a basesheet; wherein the wetting solution comprises salt; and wherein the method is performed in an environment which is substantially free of contaminants.
These embodiments may yet further comprise a method wherein the wetting solution is applied at an add-on greater than about 25%; wherein the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 25% and about 700%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 50% and 400%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 100% and 350%; the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 150% and 300%; and the wetting solution is applied at an add-on between about 200% and 250%.
In an embodiment of the invention, there is provided an apparatus for wetting and winding a substrate, comprising means for applying a wetting solution to the substrate to form a wet substrate; and means for winding coreless rolls of the wet substrate.
These embodiments may further comprise a means for perforating the substrate. These embodiments may yet further comprise an apparatus wherein the means for applying a wetting solution distributes the wetting solution evenly along the substrate; wherein the means for applying a wetting solution comprises a means for increasing the absorption rate of the solution in the substrate; wherein the wetting solution is present in the wet substrate in an add-on of at least about 25%; and wherein the apparatus is in an environment which is substantially free of contaminants.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an apparatus for wetting and winding a substrate, comprising a wetting apparatus; and a winding apparatus; wherein the winding apparatus can form wet coreless rolls with an add-on of at least about 25%. These embodiments may further comprise a perforating apparatus and a detour roller.
These embodiments may yet further comprise an apparatus wherein the wetting apparatus is a fluid distribution header; wherein the wetting apparatus is a spray boom; wherein the wetting apparatus comprises a drool bar; wherein the wetting apparatus comprises press rolls; and wherein the winding apparatus comprises an upper winding roller, a lower winding roller, a rider roller and a transfer shoe.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of winding a wet web, comprising providing a wet web of material; applying a wetting solution to the web to produce a wet web, the wetting solution comprising a salt, preferably an inorganic salt; and winding the wet web into a wet roll; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 20%.
These embodiments may further comprise a method, wherein the variability of the salt is less than about 10%, less than about 5%, and less than about 3%; wherein the wetting solution further comprises at least one preservative, the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll being less than about 60%.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of making wet rolls, comprising providing a web of material; applying a wetting solution to the web to produce a wet web, the wetting solution comprising at least one preservative; and winding the wet web into a wet roll; wherein the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 60%.
These embodiments may further comprise a method, wherein the variability of the salt is less than about 50%, less than about 40%, and less than about 35%.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of making wet rolls, comprising providing a web of material; applying a wetting solution to the web to produce a wet web, the wetting solution comprising an a salt, preferably an inorganic salt; at least one preservative; and winding the wet web into a wet roll; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 10%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 50%.
These embodiments may further comprise a method, wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 5%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 40%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 3%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 35%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is at most about 2.5%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is at most about 32.5%; wherein the salt is sodium chloride; wherein the preservative comprises a substance selected from the group consisting of IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; wherein the preservative comprises IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; wherein the web comprises a water-dispersible binder; and wherein the wet roll is coreless.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a wet coreless roll, comprising a basesheet; a salt, preferably an inorganic salt; and at least one preservative; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 20%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 60%.
These embodiments may further comprise a wet coreless roll, wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 10%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 50%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 5%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 40%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 3%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 35%; wherein the salt is sodium chloride; wherein the preservative comprises a substance selected from the group consisting of IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; wherein the preservative comprises IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; and wherein the basesheet comprises a water-dispersible binder.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a wet coreless roll prepared by a process comprising: providing a web of material; applying a wetting solution to the web to produce a wet web, the wetting solution comprising a salt, preferably an inorganic salt; at least one preservative; and winding the wet web into a wet roll.
These embodiments may further comprise a wet coreless roll, wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 20%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 60%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 10%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 50%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 5%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 40%; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 3%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 35%; wherein the salt is sodium chloride; wherein the preservative comprises a substance selected from the group consisting of IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; wherein the preservative comprises IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; and wherein the web of material comprises a water-dispersible binder.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a wet coreless roll, comprising a basesheet comprising a water-dispersible binder; sodium chloride; and at least one preservative selected from the group consisting of IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet coreless roll is less than about 5%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 40%.
In an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of winding a wet web, comprising providing a wet web of material; pinning said wet web against a low friction surface; sliding said wet web across said low friction surface toward a high friction surface; contacting said wet web against said high friction surface; moving said wet web across said high friction surface to form a bunched portion of the web; and winding the wet web around the bunched portion.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of winding a wet web, comprising providing a wet web of material; applying a wetting solution to the web to produce a wet web, the wetting solution comprising at least about 0.5% of a salt; and winding the wet web into a wet roll; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 20%.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a wet roll, comprising a basesheet; a salt; and at least one preservative; wherein the variability of the salt throughout the wet roll is less than about 20%, and the variability of each preservative throughout the wet roll is less than about 60%.
A method for making wet rolls is provided which in general includes winding a wet substrate into a wet roll. The method may provide for even distribution and absorption of a fluid throughout a substrate to provide the wet substrate. The method may include winding a substrate that has a fluid add-on of at least about 25%. An apparatus for performing the method is also provided.
Referring to
The web is delivered to the wetting and winding apparatus 1 as a sheet of material. The web may be unwound from a roll, or it may be fed to the apparatus directly from a web making apparatus. The web may be a single sheet, or the web may have multiple sheets which are combined to form a multi-ply sheet. Multi-ply sheets may be bonded together, for example with adhesives, thermal bonding, sonic bonding, or hydroentanglement. Referring to
There may optionally be a device for perforating the web. Referring to
The perforation may be accomplished by methods known to those skilled in the art. For example, a perforating apparatus as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,125,302, incorporated herein by reference, may be used to perforate the web. The perforating apparatus may contain a rotating perforation roll and a stationary anvil bar. The perforation roll in this case has multiple rows of blades along the CD of the roll, and these blades protrude slightly from the face of the roll. The space between these rows and the length of the blades dictates the perforation length and spacing. The anvil bar is typically configured as a helix, for example a double helix or single helix, such that it contacts the perforation blades only at one or two positions at a time. Thus, as the perforation roll rotates, the web becomes perforated across the entire web. The web typically wraps the rotating perforation roll. The perforating apparatus may contain a rotating anvil roll with a stationary perforation blade. Typically, multiple anvil bars are configured in a helix around the anvil roll and engage the perforation blade. The web is perforated in one location at any one time. The web does not typically wrap either the anvil roll or the perforation blade. Also, the anvil roll may be kept stationary and the perforation blade may be rotated on a roll.
Referring to
The wet winding apparatus may be any winding apparatus known to those skilled in the art. The wet winding apparatus may, for example, wind a web around a removable mandrel to produce a coreless material (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,387,284; 5,271,515; 5,271,137; 3,856,226). The winding apparatus may, for example, wind a web around a tubular or cylindrical core (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,129,304; 5,979,818; 5,368, 252; 5,248,106; 5,137,225; 4,487,377). The winding apparatus may, for example, be a coreless surface winder which can produce coreless rolls without the use of a mandrel. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,839,680; 5,690,296; 5,603,467; 5,542,622; 5,538,199; 5,402,960; 4,856,725). The above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Referring to
The wetting and winding apparatus 35 and 41 may be enclosed in a containment box 28 to which the web 34 is delivered. Such a box serves to contain the wetting solution and to maintain a sanitary environment around the wet web. The area outside the box, including the dry components of the apparatus 1 and other equipment, is shielded from contact with the wetting solution. Thus, the workspace outside the box remains safe and easy to service. Containment of the wetting solution also provides for recovery of any excess solution that is not absorbed by the web. Recovered wetting solution may or may not be recycled depending on sanitary considerations. Excess wetting solution can be removed from the box by way of a drain. The drain can also provide for removal of any liquids used for cleaning the apparatus.
The setup of the wetting and winding apparatus and the containment box may be performed in an environment that is controlled to minimize airborne contaminants. The box can thus maintain the wetting and winding apparatus, the wet web, and the resultant wet rolls, in an environment which is substantially free of contaminants. Environmental parameters which may be controlled include air circulation and filtration, temperature, and humidity. The apparatus and the box may be sanitized on a periodic basis. The wetted areas inside the box may be treated with cleaning agents to eliminate any contamination, such as mold, fungus, or bacterial growth. The wetted areas may further be rinsed with clean, preferably ozonated, water, and then dried and/or treated with alcohol, such as isopropanol. Any components outside the box that come into contact with the basesheet are also preferably sprayed or wiped with alcohol. The size of the box may be large enough to allow access to the components inside the box, yet not so large that liquid could collect and contribute to contamination. In the embodiment illustrated in
The wetting apparatus 35 includes a device for solution application and, optionally, a support for the web. The support may be an air plate, a set of belts or a backing roller 38. The support may be stationary, as in the case of an air plate; or it may be movable, as in the case of a roller. The support should be constructed of corrosion resistant material such as stainless steel or chrome. In the embodiment shown in
It is desirable to have even distribution of the wetting solution throughout the web in all directions. This homogenous wetting has many advantages. It can help to minimize or eliminate differences in physical properties within the web, such as strain and strength characteristics, allowing for reproducible processing of the wet product. It can help to minimize colonization and growth of contaminants. It can help to ensure consistent product quality; that is, a given roll of wet wipes will have substantially the same characteristics as another roll of wet wipes produced under specific operating conditions.
Even application of the wetting solution can help to provide uniform distribution of the ingredients initially present in the solution, such as dispersibility agents, preservatives, fragrances, or other additives. The distribution of ingredients may be uniform within the web of material in both the cross-direction and the machine-direction. Wet rolls made from such a web then may also have a uniform distribution of ingredients, and this uniformity may be consistent within a roll (i.e. from the outside to the center, and from one end of the roll to the other) or from one roll to another. A uniform distribution of ingredients provides for consistent storage and dispensing characteristics of a roll of wet wipes. For example, the entire roll can be equally protected from contamination if there is uniform distribution of a preservative. In another example, the roll can be dispensed acceptably regardless of the number of sheets which remain in the roll. Dispensing characteristics include, for example, peel strength, tensile strength, and perf strength, as defined in the above mentioned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/659,307. These may be independently affected by the distribution of the wetting solution.
Examples of wetting solutions are given in the above mentioned U.S. applications Ser. Nos. 09/564,449; 09/564,213; 09/565,125; 09/564,837; 09/564,939; 09/564,531; 09/564,268; 09/564,424; 09/564,780; 09/564,212; 09/565,623; and 09/223,999. Preferably, the wetting solution is added to the web with an add-on greater than about 25% . The amount of liquid or wetting solution contained within a given wet web can vary depending on factors including the type of basesheet, the type of liquid or solution being used, the wetting conditions employed, the type of container used to store the wet wipes, and the intended end use of the wet web. Typically, each wet web can contain from about 25 to about 600 weight percent and desirably from about 200 to about 400 weight percent liquid based on the dry weight of the web. To determine the liquid add-on, first the weight of a portion of dry web having specific dimensions is determined. The dry web corresponds to the basesheet which can be fed to the wetting and winding apparatus. Then, the amount of liquid by weight equal to a multiple (e.g. 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.3, etc., times) where 1=100%, 2.5=250%, etc., of the portion of the dry web, or an increased amount of liquid measured as a percent add-on based on the weight of the dry web portion, is added to the web to make it moistened, and then referred to as a “wet” web. A wet web is defined as a web which contains a solution add-on between 25% and the maximum add-on which can be accepted by the web (i.e. saturation). Preferably, the wetting solution add-on is between about 25% and 700%; more preferably between 50% and 400%; more preferably still between 100% and 350% ; more preferably still between 150% and 300%; more preferably still between 200% and 250% .
Complete absorption of the wetting solution helps to minimize the amount of excess liquid on the web and thus on the components of the apparatus. The term “absorption” refers to the absorption of liquid by a material such that no liquid will freely drop from the material when the material is held vertically for 30 seconds. The wetting and winding apparatus may be separated by a distance such that the wetting solution can be completely absorbed by the web as it travels between the wetting apparatus and the winding apparatus. This travel time may range from less than one second to about one minute. The rate of absorption can depend on many factors, including the type of basesheet, the characteristics of the binder, and the composition used as the wetting solution.
The configuration of the wetting and winding apparatus may, however, be limited, for example by space constraints or other manufacturing considerations. If there is not a sufficient distance between the apparatus, it may be desirable that the wetting solution is absorbed in a shorter time than is necessary for absorption due to simple contact between the web and the wetting solution. Higher rates of absorption can allow for higher machine speeds and increased product throughput.
Numerous parameters may be controlled in order to influence the degree and/or rate of absorption of the wetting solution, as well as the amount of solution that is wasted and/or recycled. These parameters include, for example the solution add-on level, the temperature of the wetting solution, the geometry of impingement of the solution, and the pressure applied to the web during and/or after the solution application. Ideally, the wetting solution impinges evenly along the entire cross-direction of the web.
The wetting solution can be applied by methods known to those skilled in the art. The wetting apparatus may contain, for example, a fluid distribution header, such as a die with a single orifice; a drool bar; a spray boom, such as a boom with multiple nozzles; or press rolls. The apparatus may contain, for example, a fluid distribution header 100 with an adjustable die 102 (
The apparatus may contain a spray boom 110 with multiple nozzles 112 (
Referring to
The wetting apparatus may include the use of a nip to improve distribution and absorption. A nip may be formed by the convergence of a web 123 and a header 124 (
The application of a uniform amount of wetting solution to the web before winding the web into a roll can provide for a uniform distribution of ingredients throughout the roll. This, in turn, can provide for consistent product quality (i.e. from roll to roll) as well as for consistent properties of an individual roll which may be used by a consumer. For example, in wet rolls made from a basesheet with an ion-sensitive water-dispersible binder, an even distribution of an inorganic salt, such as sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl) or potassium bromide (KBr), can ensure that any given portion of a wet roll will disperse in water at an acceptable rate. Also, the presence of a uniform distribution of inorganic salt can ensure that none of the roll will experience a decrease in wet strength, for example, during production, storage, or use. In another example, a set of preservatives may be used in the wetting solution to guard against contamination of the wet roll. Insufficient preservative levels in a portion of a roll can allow the presence and/or growth of contaminants, even if the remainder of the roll is adequately protected. Accumulation of preservative in a portion of a roll can cause the wet sheet to have an undesirable feel and/or wiping properties. An excess of preservative, in some areas of the sheet, could contribute to allergic or irritant contact dermatitis if that area was wiped on the skin. A uniform distribution of ingredients can prevent the occurrence of either of these extremes.
Uniformity of ingredients within a wet roll is determined by analyzing samples of the roll according to the following representative method. The method of analysis of ingredients may be chosen depending on the product to be analyzed, as well as the surrounding environment. The roll is unwound, and the first five sheets, the middle five sheets, and the last five sheets are removed. These sets of sheets correspond the outside portion of the roll, the portion of the roll midway between the outside and the center, and the center of the roll, respectively. Each set of sheets is then folded and cut into three equal sections corresponding to the left, middle, and right of the roll when the roll is viewed perpendicular to its axis. The sections are individually stored in airtight, moisture loss resistant containers. An individual section is placed in a syringe and compressed to express the solution. This solution is then diluted and tested for chloride using ion chromatography and tested for acid using ion-exclusion liquid chromatography. The chloride data can be converted into data for the inorganic salt level. For wipes which do not express sufficient liquid, the section is extracted with 1:1 methanol and water for 12 hours in an orbital shaker. The section from which liquid has been expressed or extracted is dried in an oven at 60° C. for 36 hours to a constant weight. The dried section is extracted with methanol in an orbital shaker for 12 hours. An aliquot of the extract is dried, and the solids are extracted with the mobile phase to be used for liquid chromatography. Liquid chromatography is used to determine the amount of non-acid preservative. For the measurement of IPBC, a section taken directly from the wet roll is dried in an oven at 60° C. for 36 hours to a constant weight and extracted for 4 hours with methanol. An aliquot of the extract is dried, the solids are extracted with the mobile phase, and the amount of IPBC is determined by liquid chromatography.
For a wet roll which was formed by the wetting and winding process and apparatus described herein and using a wetting solution containing sodium chloride as the inorganic salt and containing iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC), DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid as the preservatives, the data for the distribution of the inorganic salt and for the distribution of the preservatives are given in Table 1.
The variability of the distribution of an ingredient is defined as the standard deviation as a percentage of the average mean value for all the data points obtained. For example, for the sodium chloride data above, the mean value is 4.40 with a standard deviation of 0.11, which is 2.5% of the mean value. Thus, the sodium chloride values have a variability of 2.5%. The variabilities for IPBC, DMDM Hydantoin, and malic acid are 32.5%, 3.7%, and 5.3%, respectively. It is preferred that the inorganic salt has a variability of less than about 20%, more preferably less than about 10%, more preferably still less than about 5%, more preferably still less than about 3%. It is noted that the inorganic salt is considered an additive only when present at a level of at least about 0.5% , more preferably at least about 1.0%. Some inorganic salt may be present in any wetting solution at levels below these loadings, for example due to water impurities or residual cleaning solutions. For the preservatives in the wet roll, it is preferred that all preservatives individually have a variability of less than about 60%, more preferably less than about 50%, more preferably still less than about 40%, more preferably still less than about 35% . The above are examples of the uniformity of addition of ingredients that may be obtained with the present invention. Such uniformity may also be obtained for other additives and types of additives, and this invention is not limited to those additives exemplified above.
Referring to
Referring to
The upper winding roller preferably has a high friction surface 45 to stabilize the wet web on the roller. A high friction surface is defined as having a surface roughness greater than 250 roughness average (Ra). The friction of a surface can also be quantified in terms of coefficient of friction, in which a higher coefficient of friction corresponds to a higher friction surface. Roughness average is measured by a profilometer, and is based on a graphical centerline, which is the line through the profile of the surface where the sums of the area on either side of the line (peaks and valleys) are equal. Roughness average is defined as the arithmetic average of the height of the peaks above the graphical centerline over a given area, and is expressed in units of microinches (0.000001 inch). The graphical centerline is the least-squares best fit line through the profile data. An example of a profilometer is the Model S5 TALYSURF Surface Profilometer (RANK TAYLOR HOBSON, LTD., Leicester, England). The Ra of a surface can be measured following the procedures described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,551, which is incorporated herein by reference, using a single line trace of the surface and a “cut-off” length of 0.8 mm. For example, an 8 mm sampling length would consist of 10 cut-offs of 0.8 mm each.
A presently preferred material for the surface 45 of the upper winding roller is tungsten carbide. Preferably, the surface of the upper winding roller has a roughness of at least about 300 Ra, more preferably at least about 500 Ra, more preferably still at least about 600 Ra, and more preferably still at least about 700 Ra. It is desirable to wind the wet web without the use of vacuum rollers, which contain vacuum ports on their surface to ensure stability of the web. The wetting solution, especially if present in excess (i.e. not fully absorbed by the web), can accumulate on the surface of the web and can also be transferred to the rollers and/or other components of the wet winding apparatus. A high friction surface on the upper winding roll can help to compensate for the decrease in the coefficient of friction of the web due to the presence of the wetting solution. The position of the upper winding roller relative to the detour roller may provide for the web to wrap around a portion of the upper winding roller. Typically, at least 10% of the surface area of the upper winding roller contacts the web. The detour roller preferably has a high friction surface, which may be made of tungsten carbide. More preferably, the surface roughness of the detour roller is at least about 300 Ra, more preferably still at least about 500 Ra.
Referring to
The coordinated action of the upper winding roller and the transfer shoe 48 on the web results in the beginning of the formation of a log. The transfer shoe is a preferably a rigid material with a high friction surface. The transfer shoe also has a concave surface 49 with a radius of curvature that is substantially the same as that of the upper winding roller. The curvature may be interrupted by a ridge 150. The transfer shoe may be mounted so that it can move along the directions of arrow 54 in an indexing motion. To start the winding of a new log, the transfer shoe is indexed towards the upper winding roller. The shoe is illustrated in the raised position 80 in
Referring to
The web 42, upper winding roller, and transfer shoe converge to trap a portion of the web between the smooth region of the upper winding roller and the ridge on the transfer shoe. A perforated web will have a line of perforation downstream from this line of convergence, and the distance between the line of perforation and the line of convergence may be from 0 mm to the distance between two adjacent lines of perforation. For a web having 5 inches (127 mm) between lines of perforation, the distance between the line of perforation and the line of convergence may be between 0 mm and 127 mm. The distance between the line of perforation and the line of convergence may be from about 1 mm to about 50 mm, from about 5 mm to about 30 mm, and from about 6 mm to about 13 mm.
Referring to
The cigarette 86 stays in contact with the upper winding roller, and the rotational movement of the upper winding roller continues to roll the cigarette across the surface of the transfer shoe. The upper winding roller may also move slightly upward (vertically) to allow the cigarette to increase in diameter. The cigarette then moves off the transfer shoe surface and into the gap 152 between the upper winding roller and lower winding roller. Simultaneously, the speed of the lower winding roller is increased from a speed less than the speed of the web to substantially the same speed as the web. The transfer shoe may have fingers that mesh with grooves in the lower winding roller to provide a smooth surface for the cigarette to transition from the shoe to the roller. The growing roll continues to move into the winding pocket 60 until contacted by the rider roller. During the winding of the roll, the lower winding roller and the rider roller rotate at speeds substantially the same as the upper winding roller. The log continues to wind, increasing in size until the proper sheet count and/or diameter is obtained. The rotational speeds of the upper winding roller, the lower winding roller, and the rider roller may be independently varied to control the winding firmness.
It is preferred that the lower winding roller has a tungsten carbide surface. Preferably, the surface of the upper winding roller has a roughness of at least about 300 Ra, more preferably at least about 500 Ra, more preferably still at least about 600 Ra, and more preferably still at least about 700 Ra.
The rider roller is preferably mounted on a movable rider roller arm 94 (
The rotational motion 70 of the wound roll causes the roll to move out of the pocket in the direction of arrow 68 for subsequent delivery or collection. This motion can be assisted by the difference in relative speeds of the upper and lower winding rollers such that the force of the upper roller dominates. The lower winding roller is optionally equipped with a cover or shroud 64 for a portion of the roller which is not part of the roll winding pocket such that the wound roll may rotate onto a stationary surface.
Referring to
It is preferred that the materials used for the wetting and winding apparatus, as well as any equipment which is in contact with the wetting solution, are resistant to corrosion. The apparatus and their components may also be coated with corrosion resistant materials. Examples of corrosion resistant materials include 316 L stainless steel, nickel and its alloys, tungsten carbide, and poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (TEFLON, DUPONT). The components of the apparatus may be controlled by standard controlling equipment and software. For example, the apparatus may be controlled and monitored with a standard programmable logic controller (PLC). Individual apparatus may have separately controls, and these controls may be operably linked with the main control for the overall apparatus. For example, the winding apparatus may be controlled and monitored with a PanelMate Human Machine Interface (HMI). The HMI can control the starting, stopping, and other parameters that affect the wetting and winding of the web. The HMI may interface to the PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) that actually controls the machine.
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/900,516, filed Jul. 6, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,649,262, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
257761 | Ridgway | May 1882 | A |
258895 | Crawshaw | Jun 1882 | A |
273198 | Vaughan | Feb 1883 | A |
395645 | Anderson | Jan 1889 | A |
1195888 | Wheelwright | Aug 1916 | A |
1235183 | Butterworth | Jul 1917 | A |
1302352 | French | Apr 1919 | A |
1316782 | Frothingham et al. | Sep 1919 | A |
1558271 | Newell | Oct 1925 | A |
1901080 | Bradner | Mar 1933 | A |
1956561 | Coates | May 1934 | A |
2025375 | Cameron et al. | Dec 1935 | A |
2054113 | Abrahams et al. | Sep 1936 | A |
2059881 | Lane | Nov 1936 | A |
2066780 | Holt | Jan 1937 | A |
2119480 | Codwise | May 1938 | A |
2186957 | Collings et al. | Jan 1940 | A |
2251295 | Sheesley | Aug 1941 | A |
2257113 | George | Sep 1941 | A |
2321938 | Quinn | Jun 1943 | A |
2333629 | Beadle, Sr. | Nov 1943 | A |
2361082 | Brown | Oct 1944 | A |
2556262 | Faeber | Jun 1951 | A |
2562457 | Hannay et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
3019130 | Hornbostel | Jan 1962 | A |
3066046 | Walton | Nov 1962 | A |
3097968 | Schaefer | Jul 1963 | A |
3668905 | Schlunke | Jun 1972 | A |
3766756 | Farrar | Oct 1973 | A |
3776482 | Mras | Dec 1973 | A |
3776763 | Ross | Dec 1973 | A |
3797281 | Norton | Mar 1974 | A |
3830143 | Dowd, Jr. | Aug 1974 | A |
3844813 | Leonard et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3853279 | Gerstein | Dec 1974 | A |
3856226 | Dowd, Jr. | Dec 1974 | A |
3873025 | Qvarnstrom | Mar 1975 | A |
3906893 | Scales | Sep 1975 | A |
3949035 | Dunning et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3980043 | Pomper | Sep 1976 | A |
4045598 | Henson | Aug 1977 | A |
4108110 | Berry | Aug 1978 | A |
4213218 | Winch | Jul 1980 | A |
4247362 | Williams | Jan 1981 | A |
4257343 | Kullander | Mar 1981 | A |
4259924 | Smith | Apr 1981 | A |
4338876 | Norton | Jul 1982 | A |
4447924 | Bolton et al. | May 1984 | A |
4485980 | Gorner | Dec 1984 | A |
4487377 | Perini | Dec 1984 | A |
4533435 | Intili | Aug 1985 | A |
4556454 | Dahl et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4565155 | Koski | Jan 1986 | A |
4583698 | Nistri et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4590099 | Reith | May 1986 | A |
4601256 | Poterala | Jul 1986 | A |
4601938 | Deacon et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4649695 | Crouch et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4695005 | Gietman, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
4723724 | Bradley | Feb 1988 | A |
4741944 | Jackson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4790491 | Mundus et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4803194 | Bracewell | Feb 1989 | A |
4807825 | Eisner et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4856725 | Bradley | Aug 1989 | A |
4865221 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4929474 | Avni et al. | May 1990 | A |
4962897 | Bradley | Oct 1990 | A |
5049440 | Bornhoeft, III et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5076424 | Nakamura | Dec 1991 | A |
5089296 | Bafford et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5104055 | Buxton | Apr 1992 | A |
5137225 | Biagiotti | Aug 1992 | A |
5152121 | Nakamura | Oct 1992 | A |
5152471 | Goerner | Oct 1992 | A |
5201164 | Kaufman | Apr 1993 | A |
5243841 | Fleissner | Sep 1993 | A |
5271575 | Weinert | Dec 1993 | A |
5275348 | Looser | Jan 1994 | A |
5304391 | Rantanen | Apr 1994 | A |
5314119 | Watt | May 1994 | A |
5389148 | Matsunaga | Feb 1995 | A |
5401315 | Salo et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402960 | Oliver et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5449328 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5478027 | Alexander, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5501775 | Kotitschke et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5509161 | Neveu et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5527255 | Mansfield | Jun 1996 | A |
5538199 | Biagiotti | Jul 1996 | A |
5540332 | Kopacz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542622 | Biagiotti | Aug 1996 | A |
5545295 | Fujita et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5578124 | Cleveland et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5603467 | Perini et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5639046 | Biagiotti | Jun 1997 | A |
5648083 | Blieszner et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660349 | Miller et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667635 | Win et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690296 | Biagiotti | Nov 1997 | A |
5759339 | Hartman | Jun 1998 | A |
5839680 | Biagiotti | Nov 1998 | A |
5848756 | Sollinger et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5913905 | Fleissner | Jun 1999 | A |
5958187 | Bhat et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6056229 | Blume et al. | May 2000 | A |
6140551 | Niemeyer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6228216 | Lindsay et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248211 | Jennings et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6429261 | Lang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444214 | Cole et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6649262 | Hoo et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651924 | Gingras et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20030015209 | Gingras et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017333 | Hoo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025029 | Gingras et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030113458 | Hoo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040096483 | Wilks et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050031779 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09900516 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10664342 | US |