This invention relates generally to systems for production of a gas from a mixture of an oxygen-containing gas stream and a hydrocarbon-containing gas stream. An example of where this invention has utility is systems for industrial production of ethylene oxide.
The chemical compound ethylene oxide (chemical formula C2H4O) is an important industrial chemical used as an intermediate in the production of ethylene glycol (the main component of automotive antifreeze) and other chemicals. Ethylene oxide is also used as a sterilant for foods and medical supplies. It is a colorless flammable gas at room temperature, and can be cooled and stored as a liquid.
Ethylene oxide first achieved industrial importance during World War I as a precursor to both ethylene glycol and the chemical weapon mustard gas. In 1931, Theodore Lefort, a French chemist, discovered a means to prepare ethylene oxide directly from ethylene and oxygen, using silver as a catalyst. Since 1940, almost all ethylene oxide produced industrially has been made using this method.
In current industrial processes, ethylene oxide is produced when ethylene (CH2═CH2) and oxygen (O2) react on a silver catalyst at 200-300° C. showing large Ag nanoparticles supported on Alumina. Typically, chemical modifiers such as chlorine are also included. Pressures used are in the region of 1-2 MPa. The chemical equation for this reaction is:
CH2═CH2+½O2→C2H4O
In ethylene oxide production systems, a gas mixer is used to mix the hydrocarbon and oxygen gas streams just upstream of the reaction chamber where the silver catalyst is present. The gas mixer is typically constructed in the form of a vessel or pipe. The vessel includes an inlet manifold for each of the two gases. The vessel is sometimes constructed with a main outer pipe containing the hydrocarbon-containing gas stream and internal concentric tubes or “fingers” which contain the oxygen stream. Mixing occurs at the point where the internal tubes end, where the oxygen gas flowing out of the fingers meets the main stream of hydrocarbon-containing gas flowing in the outer tube. This basic design is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,706,534.
The art has long recognized that there is a risk of ignition of a hydrocarbon-containing gas stream (e.g., a stream of gas containing for example ethylene mixed with other hydrocarbon gases) at the point where it is combined with an oxygen gas in a gas mixer. Ignition can occur when a particle (e.g. a piece of rust or pipe scale) entrained in the hydrocarbon or oxygen gas stream strikes a metallic surface in the mixer, e.g., the wall of the mixer, thereby producing a spark. If the spark occurs in the hydrocarbon stream in an area of high concentration of oxygen, e.g., at, or close to, the point of mixing of the two gas streams, ignition can occur. The ignition damages the gas mixer and also requires an interrupt of production to suppress the ignition and allow the gas mixer to cool before recommencing production. The flammable region is confined to the mixing zone of the two gases. The hydrocarbon gas as well as the reactor feed blend are below the lower O2 flammability limit—i.e., too rich to burn.
The art has devised a variety of gas mixer designs. Some of the designs are specifically directed to reducing the risk of ignition of hydrocarbon and oxygen gas stream. The known prior art includes the following patent documents, in addition to the above-cited '534 patent: U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,803; U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,619; U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,604; U.S. Pat. No. 4,415,508; U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,079; U.S. 2003/0021182; U.S. Pat. No. 3,518,284; U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,346; U.S. Pat. No. 3,237,923; U.S. Pat. No. 3,081,818; U.S. Pat. No. 2,614,616 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,840,256.
Oxygen supply lines contain particles that can cause ignition hazards. The hazards include sand, dust, metal, and partially oxidized metal particles, although other inert contaminants may pose hazards. At one extreme, impact of large particles, about 100 to 2000 microns, may cause the metal that forms the oxygen piping, valves, and flow control equipment to ignite. At the other extreme, small particles of about 5-1000 microns may cause ignition in the mixers of partial oxidation processes such as ethylene oxide and glycol, or related partial processes using high purity oxygen. It is common practice to use strainers in oxygen supply lines to remove large particles. These do not remove the small particles that can cause mixer fires. Smaller particles down to about 10 microns may be removed using fine filters, but this creates other problems. The filters are liable to clog and are at risk of ignition due to spontaneous ignition or frictional heating, which can cause a fire in the oxygen supply line. The latter is typically caused by poor maintenance or loosening of components over time, creating rubbing of the metal components of the filter.
Additionally, the current practice of filtration and strainers accumulates and concentrates contaminants in the device. This also necessitates periodic cleaning and removal of particulate that has been captured. Pleated metal, ceramic, or mineral wool filter elements collect the particulate. Often the filter housing will contain a number of filter elements operating with parallel flow paths. When the filters collect sufficient material, current practice is to briefly shut the plant down to clean the filter elements. The concentrated particulate can be a source of kindling material for an oxygen fire. These manual operations expose people to hazards. In addition, removing particulate of smaller sizes, such as in the range of 5-30 microns requires more complex and costly filtration devices.
Other prior art of interest include the following patents directed to wet scrubbing technology: U.S. Pat. No. 6,231,648; U.S. Pat. No. 4,012,469; U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,654 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,250,267. Wet scrubbers have been used heretofore in several applications, including mining, semiconductor fabrication, and others, such as for example to remove coal dust, toxic or flammable gases or other contaminants, e.g., sulfur compounds, from a supply of air which is to be released into the environment. To the knowledge of the inventors, wet scrubbing technology has not been previously adopted in ethylene oxide or related production systems.
This disclosure solves a long-felt need in the art for a solution to the problem of removal of particles down to about 5 microns size in an oxygen supply line, while not concentrating the particles, and avoiding problems with clogging or ignition of filters in the oxygen supply lines. Furthermore, production systems using the features of this disclosure avoid the need for a process shutdown to manage the accumulated particulate in screens or filters. Furthermore, it provides for methods of eliminating particulate matter without accumulating material that may be a source of material for a fire in the oxygen supply line.
The present disclosure is directed to systems for industrial production using oxygen containing gases or enriched air supplies. The invention features the use of one or more wet scrubbing systems in the oxygen supply line to remove particles from the oxygen stream. The wet scrubbing system transfers these particles to an aqueous phase. In particular, wet scrubbing technology transfers solid particles from the gas phase to a water film and phase by diffusion and impaction. The particles become entrained in water which flows through the wet scrubber and are removed from the wet scrubber as a suspension. This provides an environment where the oxygen stream is made essentially particulate free without increasing the potential of a fire in the gas mixer in a partial oxidation process such as the production of ethylene oxide. Particles are removed from the system in the water phase. The particulate concentration in the preferred scrubbing liquid, water, is managed by removing the particles from the system with a combination of filters to remove large particles and purging the scrubbing fluid to remove small particles. Water can be passed through the wet scrubber in either a single pass or in a recirculation loop with appropriate purging and filtering of the recirculated water.
One primary application of the invention is an ethylene oxide production process, in which oxygen is mixed at an intermediate pressure (˜20 bar) with recycled flammable gas containing ethylene and other gases. The invention can similarly be used for other partial oxidation processes using pure oxygen or enriched air supplies.
This invention greatly improves the safety of the oxygen injection system into the recirculation stream of ethylene in a gas mixer by removing an ignition source of entrained particulate matter in the oxygen supply. Water scrubbing as a class of particulate removal is advantageous for coupling to the ethylene oxide process (and other hydrocarbon/oxygen gas mixing processes) because particulates are removed and never concentrated. As noted above, current best practice is to use filters on the incoming oxygen supply. However, these filters collect and concentrate the particulate that has been itself a cause of ignition events. Coupling a wet scrubber to the oxygen supply obviates the need for filters in the oxygen supply line and thus avoids problems associated therewith. Furthermore, the wet scrubber can be readily designed to remove particulate having a size in the range of 5-1,000 microns, i.e., particle sizes which present particular risks of ignition in an ethylene oxide gas mixer. Because these particles are removed, the risks of ignition in the gas mixer are substantially reduced.
Thus, in one aspect of this disclosure, an improvement is provided to a system for production of ethylene oxide, the system including an oxygen supply line for carrying a stream of oxygen gas and a gas mixer where the oxygen gas is mixed with a hydrocarbon-containing gas stream, the improvement comprising providing a wet scrubber in the oxygen supply line, the wet scrubber removing particulate matter from the stream of oxygen gas wherein scrubbed oxygen (particulate free) gas is supplied to the gas mixer.
In another aspect, a method is provided for mixing an oxygen gas with a hydrocarbon gas, comprising the steps of: wet scrubbing the oxygen gas in a wet scrubber; supplying oxygen gas from the wet scrubber to a gas mixer; and mixing the oxygen gas with the hydrocarbon gas in the gas mixer.
A variety of wet scrubber constructions are suitable for use in the inventive methods. Several preferred constructions will be described in some detail. These include packed-tower, bubble cap, jet-type, and sparger-type wet scrubbers.
The system 10 includes an oxygen supply line 12 carrying a stream of oxygen gas from a source (not shown). The oxygen supply line includes entrained particulate matter, such as sand, rust, pipe scale, typically in the range of 5-1000 microns in size. The system may include an optional in-line strainer (not shown) to remove very large particles or foreign matter. The system 10 features a wet scrubber 14 which functions to remove most or more preferably substantially all of the particulate matter in a given size range (5-1000 microns in one embodiment) from the stream of oxygen gas. Scrubbed oxygen gas is supplied along a pipe 16 to a gas mixer 20. The pipe 16 is preferably made from a scale and corrosion resistant material, such as stainless steel or Monel.
A second pipe 18 carries a hydrocarbon-containing gas stream to the gas mixer 20. The hydrocarbon-containing gas stream (containing ethylene gas and possibly other hydrocarbon gases in this example) is mixed with the oxygen gas stream in the gas mixer 20. The resulting mixed gases are fed to a reaction chamber 22 containing a catalyst. A reaction occurs between the two gases in the reaction chamber 22. The resulting reaction product (e.g., ethylene oxide (“EO”)) is fed from the reaction chamber 22 to a recovery train and storage facility or a downstream reactor or production facility. The reaction chamber 22 (or downstream reaction facilities) may include facilities EO recovery, CO2 removal, and EO purification. Hydrocarbon gases are recovered from the reaction chamber 22 and recycled via line 23 to a mixer 24 where they are mixed with ethylene gas along line 25. Thus, the gas injected into the mixer 20 on line 18 contains ethylene gas and other hydrocarbon gases in this example.
The use of the wet scrubber 14 in the oxygen supply line 12 overcomes many problems which have plagued the art for many years. In particular, it achieves the goal of removal of particles from the oxygen supply line, while not concentrating the particles and avoiding problems with clogging or ignition of filters in the oxygen supply lines 12. Furthermore, the wet scrubber 14 can perform the scrubbing task continuously, avoiding the need for a process shutdown to manage the accumulated particulate in screens or filters. Additionally, it eliminates particulate matter from the oxygen feed, without accumulating material that may be a source of “kindling” material for a fire in the oxygen supply line 12.
The particular details of the construction of the wet scrubber may vary widely depending on the needs or requirements of the particular industrial process that is involved. Wet scrubbers for particulate systems suitable for this disclosure have been well studied. Several well characterized wet scrubber systems for particulate removal are illustrated in FIG. 11-6 of Armin Burkholz's book “Droplet Separation” VCH Publishers, New York (1989), which is incorporated by reference herein. These systems include packed tower, jet scrubber, swirl scrubber, rotary scrubber and venturi scrubber systems. The simple packed tower can readily be designed to achieve 95% removal of particles above 1.5 micron diameter for a particle density of 2.4 grams per cubic centimeter. FIG. 11-7 of the Burkholz book shows the experimental fractional separation efficiency curves for different types of scrubbers for dust particles of that particle density at 1 bar (absolute) pressure.
Wet scrubber systems transfer the particulate matter to a water stream that is flowed through the scrubber 14. The particulate matter can either be purged or filtered from the liquid. There is some operational complexity associated with start-up and shut down of the wet scrubber. In addition, the water stream will be super-oxygenated, thus the alloys chosen for the wet scrubber must resist corrosion in this environment. Preferably, the water used in the wet scrubber is conditioned water in which dissolved salts are substantially removed from the water. For example, the conditioned water is a steam condensate (distilled water).
The wet scrubber 14 may include the following elements: a system oxygen feed, a wet scrubbing particulate removal device (packed tower, jet scrubber, venturi scrubber, or other device), a water recirculation pump, a strainer to remove large particles (optional), a scrubbing liquid (water, and particularly conditioned water being preferred) feed, and a purge of water containing the particulate matter. Smaller diameter particulate will be carried out of the system with the purged liquid that could be optionally filtered. High reliability is required for this system, therefore some of the particulate removal technologies are advantaged due the low complexity level and absence of moving parts, and others are greatly disadvantaged for this application. A rotary scrubber is an example of disadvantaged approach because of the mechanically complexity presented by a rotary contactor device used in such a scrubber.
A typical process requirement for particulate removal in an ethylene oxide production system is removal of particles in the size range of 5 to 1000 microns at an operating pressure of 20-25 bar. This requirement suggests that the less mechanically intensive/complex devices, such as a packed tower, trayed tower, or jet scrubber will achieve the desired results with maximum reliability.
Experimental testing of wet scrubbers by the inventors have resulted in several additional insights on the preferred design of a wet scrubber.
Firstly, very small particles appear to have the ability to attach themselves to quiescent (low-flow) sections of the scrubber vessel, such as on the vessel wall. Over time, these particles could accumulate to a sufficiently large mass such that they could drop off of the wall of the vessel. It is possible that some particles could escape out of the scrubber when a relatively large mass of particles falls off or drops from a surface. To militate against this, an optional feature may be incorporated into the scrubber consisting of an internal network of spray nozzles, connected by water supply piping, that could allow wash water to be sprayed on a prescribed or as-needed basis to wash down the internal walls of the scrubber vessel most likely to accumulate small particles. These locations would be identified during the vessel design to allow the number of spray nozzles and their orientation to be optimized.
Secondly, to further reduce the potential for small particles to escape from the scrubber in water mist or entrainment out of the top of the scrubber, another optional feature which can be added to the scrubber is a mist eliminator or cycle separator at the top (vapor outlet) of the scrubber vessel. A suitable mist eliminator could be made of wire mesh or metal vanes.
Thirdly, we haven noticed that it appears that very small (<100 micron) particles may accumulate in a film on top of the water surface (e.g., in the design of
The wet scrubber of
The vessel 30 includes an oxygen feed inlet 50 receiving oxygen from the supply pipe 12 and a clean oxygen outlet 54 supplying clean oxygen gas to outlet pipe 16, which supplies oxygen gas to the gas mixer 20 of
As noted, the water circulated in the loop 32 is preferably clean, filtered, deionized, conditioned water in which dissolved salts are substantially removed from the water, such as water obtained from condensation of steam (distilled water).
In a commercial scale implementation in a packed tower type scrubber (
The design of
The design of
The trays 70 are shown arranged within the vessel 30 in a plurality of vertically-stacked trays supporting a flow of water 74 over the bubble caps 72. The water inlet 42 is positioned within the vessel 30 at or above the top-most tray 70 as shown in
In an example of a commercial production system, dry oxygen gas flows into the vessel 30 at a rate of 50,000 kg/hr. Clean, filtered, conditioned water is introduced at the inlet 42 at a rate of 500 kg/hr. Excess water is removed from the vessel on line 82 at a rate of approximately 425 kg/hr, with approximately 75 kg/hr water absorbed by the oxygen gas. The vessel in the illustrated embodiment is approximately 3 meters in height, made from stainless steel to withstand 30 bar. The bubble caps 72 are seal welded to the trays 70. The diameter of the vessel is approximately 1.3 m. The number of trays and bubble caps can be varied to achieve the degree of particulate removal that is desired.
The design of
In one possible variation, the embodiment of
As with the case in Example 1, the design of Example 2 preferably places the wet scrubber 14 close to the gas mixer 20 with only the isolation and flow control valves between the outlet of the wet scrubber 14 and the inlet to the mixer 20.
The design of
In an example of a commercial production system, dry oxygen gas flows into the vessel 30 at a rate of 50,000 kg/hr. Clean, filtered, conditioned water is introduced at the inlet 42 at a rate of 500 kg/hr. Excess water is removed from the vessel at a rate of approximately 425 kg/hr, with approximately 75 kg/hr water absorbed by the oxygen gas and removed from the vessel with the gas. The vessel in the illustrated embodiment is approximately 3 meters in height, 1.3 m in width, and made from stainless steel in a design to withstand 30 bar.
The design of Example 3 is also advantageous in many applications because it is a simple design with no moving parts, and does not require a recirculation loop for the water. An alternative embodiment would include a recirculation loop and filter or screen, make up mixing point, and purge for removal of water from the recirculation loop.
As with the case in Example 1, the design of Example 3 preferably places the wet scrubber close to the gas mixer 20 with only the isolation and flow control valves between the outlet of the wet scrubber 14 and the inlet to the mixer 20.
The design of
From the above discussion, it will be appreciated that the Examples disclosed above, taken in conjunction with
Even more generally stated, the features of this disclosure provide an improvement to any partial oxidation system (of which ethylene oxide production is but one example) having an oxygen supply line carrying a stream of oxygen gas. The improvement takes the form of providing a wet scrubber in the oxygen supply line, the wet scrubber removing particulate matter from the stream of oxygen gas.
The water used in the wet scrubbers of this disclosure will typically be at ambient temperature.
While presently preferred embodiments have been described with particularity, variation from the specifics of the disclosed embodiments may be made without departure from the scope of the invention. All questions concerning scope of the invention are to be determined by reference to the appended claims.
This application is a U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/US2008/012715, filed Nov. 12, 2008, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/007,671, filed Dec. 14, 2007, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/012715 | 11/12/2008 | WO | 00 | 3/15/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/078900 | 6/25/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2614616 | Villoresi et al. | Oct 1952 | A |
2981747 | Lang et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
2998465 | Drummond et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
3081818 | Braconier et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3237923 | Turner | Mar 1966 | A |
3518284 | Foster | Jun 1970 | A |
3570471 | Lazaridis | Mar 1971 | A |
3702619 | Son | Nov 1972 | A |
3706534 | Verheul et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
4012469 | Accortt | Mar 1977 | A |
4256604 | Aida et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4348476 | Hou | Sep 1982 | A |
4390346 | Cramer et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4393817 | Lindberg | Jul 1983 | A |
4415508 | Aida et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4564298 | Gritters et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4573803 | Gritters et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4634459 | Pischinger et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4926620 | Donle | May 1990 | A |
5037619 | Alagy et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5178654 | Cowley | Jan 1993 | A |
5250267 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5328359 | Retallick | Jul 1994 | A |
5336791 | Jennings et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
6231648 | Marlowe | May 2001 | B1 |
6657079 | Mitsumoto et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6713036 | Vanden Bussche et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6840256 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6953495 | Schwab | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7108838 | McGee | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20020170429 | Flippo et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030021182 | Illy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030175183 | Guetlhuber | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040062689 | Gauthier et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050234278 | van Egmond et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036106 | Mazanec et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060231645 | Chan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005020942 | Nov 2006 | DE |
0006734 | Jan 1980 | EP |
0026827 | Apr 1981 | EP |
1705167 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1726355 | Nov 2006 | EP |
672446 | May 1952 | GB |
705176 | Mar 1954 | GB |
1262436 | Feb 1972 | GB |
1368922 | Oct 1974 | GB |
2009174 | Jun 1979 | GB |
2357318 | Jun 2001 | GB |
55061927 | May 1985 | JP |
55064579 | May 1985 | JP |
59083 | Jun 2004 | TW |
WO0185873 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO2007045457 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2009078897 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009078898 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009078899 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009102311 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012716, mailed Jun. 24, 2010. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012714, mailed Jun. 24, 2010. |
Burkholz, Armin, “Droplet Separation”, 1989, pp. 180-182, VCH Publishers, New York, NY. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,257, Low Shear Gas Mixer, filed Mar. 15, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,270, Oxygen/Hydrocarbon Rapid (High Shear) Gas Mixer, Particularly for the Production of Ethylene Oxide, filed Mar. 15, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,274, Hydrocarbon/Oxygen Industrial Gas Mixer With Water Mist, filed Mar. 15, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,276, Hydrocarbon/Oxygen Industrial Gas Mixer With Coarse Water Droplet Environment to Reduce Ignition Potential, filed Mar. 15, 2010. |
Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,701,527, dated Nov. 16, 2010. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 08 861 507.5, dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
Examination Report for GCC/P/2008/12276, GCC Patent Office, dated Feb. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,257, Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,270, Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,274, Office Action mailed Jul. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,276, Office Action mailed May 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,257, Response to Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2012, filed Jun. 15, 2012. |
Mawhinney et al., Halon Options Technical Working Conference, Protecting Against Vapor Explosions With Water Mist, 215-226, May 2-4, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/678,257, Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2012. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012715, mailed Mar. 29, 2010. |
PCT International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012587, mailed Feb. 10, 2009. |
PCT International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012716, mailed Oct. 5, 2009. |
PCT International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012715, mailed Feb. 3, 2009. |
PCT International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012714, mailed Mar. 10, 2009. |
PCT International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012586, mailed Feb. 11, 2009. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012587, mailed Feb. 10, 2009. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012716, mailed Oct. 5, 2009. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012715, mailed Nov. 19, 2009. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012714, mailed Mar. 10, 2009. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012586, mailed Feb. 11, 2009. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012587, mailed Feb. 22, 2010. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT International Application No. PCT/US2008/012586, mailed Feb. 22, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100263535 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61007671 | Dec 2007 | US |