The invention relates to a wheelbearing unit with at least one outer part, at least one inner part and at least two rows of rolling bodies between the outer part and the inner part, there being formed on the outer part in each case at least one inner raceway and on the inner part in each case at least one outer raceway for the rolling bodies of a row.
Known wheelbearing units have a relatively high weight and relatively low bearing rigidity. The bearing rigidity is in this case the resistance which the unit applies against elastic deflections caused by loads. The bearing rigidity results in a tilt resistance which arises from the ratio of moments from loads to the tilt angle in the bearing, for example in Nm/°.
The tilt resistance is the lower, the more the bearing is tilted under loads, that is to say the greater the tilt angle is under the same load. Loads are those loads which essentially act, in the operating state of a vehicle, on a vehicle wheel and on the associated wheel suspension.
The lower the bearing rigidity, the more the loads cause tilts of the wheel system, which have an adverse effect on the driving behavior of the vehicle, in particular when driving around bends, and, via a high axial brake disk deflection, particularly in the region of the brake disks, also have an adverse effect on the wear of the brake and the functioning of the brake.
The object of the invention, therefore, is to provide a wheelbearing unit with high bearing rigidity.
This object is achieved by means of the wheel bearing unit having the features according to the independent claim.
The wheelbearing unit (1) has at least one outer part (8), at least one inner part (10) and at least two rows of rolling bodies (11) between the outer part (8) and the inner part, there being formed on the outer part (8) in each case at least one inner raceway (15, 16) and on the inner part (10) in each case at least one outer raceway (13, 14) for the rolling bodies (11) of a row.
Furthermore, the wheelbearing unit has a wheel hub which itself has, particularly in the case of driven axles/wheels or particularly for driven axles/wheels, an internal toothing projecting radially inward in the direction of the axis of rotation.
The internal toothing is provided for engagement into an external toothing of a drive journal or the like.
The wheel hub is fixedly at least coupled in terms of rotation to the outer raceway, that is to say, for example, either the wheel hub is the inner part itself and then has at least one of the raceways or at least one inner ring is seated as an inner part on the wheel hub.
The wheelbearing unit according to the invention is characterized in that the ratio of the diameter dz of a tip circle of the internal toothing to the bearing width bL of the outer part to be higher than 0.9, that is to say
dz/bL>0.9
with the following explanatory boundary conditions which do not restrict the subject of the invention:
In each case, preferred, advantageous and nontrivial developments of the subject of the invention according to the independent claim may be gathered from the dependent claims.
Thus, in a development, there may be provision for the ratio of the diameter TK of the reference circle of a row of rolling bodies of the wheelbearing unit to the diameter dK of the rolling bodies to be higher than the numerical value 6, in short 6, and for a row spacing rL between two axially mutually adjacent rows of the rolling bodies (that is to say, the axial center distance from the center of rolling bodies of one row to the center of rolling bodies of the adjacent row) to correspond at most to 1.65 times the diameter dK of the rolling bodies.
Thus:
TK>6·dK
rL≦1.65·dK
with the following, non-restrictive, explanatory boundary conditions:
The choice of the ratio and of the row spacing departs from the opinion, prevailing among specialists, that the selected dimensions of wheelbearing units must be as small as possible.
Owing to the larger rolling body reference circle, with the static load-bearing coefficient Co being the same, this results, as compared with a bearing of the prior art, from
C0=f0·i·z·dK2·cos α0
in a larger number of balls per row of the bearing according to the invention, particularly when the selected ball diameter dK is as small as possible.
The rigidity is dependent on factors, such as the modulus of elasticity of the rolling bearing material, on the osculation of the raceway and, to a high degree, on the number of rolling bodies and also the diameter of the rolling bodies.
Thus, for example, for a bearing with a diameter of the reference circle of TK=64 to 65 mm and for z=14 rolling bodies with dK=12.7 mm, a lower rigidity is obtained in a bearing according to the prior art than an advantageously higher rigidity which is obtained for the wheelbearing unit according to the invention with the same reference circle diameter and for z=21 with dK=11.112 mm.
The bearing rigidity, which is increased markedly by virtue of the invention or developments thereof by approximately 40% in comparison with the prior art, leads to an increased bearing tilt resistance. The increased bearing tilt resistance leads to lower load-dependent deformations on the wheelbearing unit and therefore to lower deformations on the brake disks.
Furthermore, in a development, there may be provision for the axial bearing width bL of the outer part to correspond at most to four times the diameter of the smallest load-bearing rolling body of the wheelbearing unit. Hence,
bL≦4·dK
with the following boundary conditions:
Finally, in one refinement of the invention, there is provision for the bearing cross section qL to correspond at most to twice the diameter of the smallest rolling bodies of the wheelbearing unit. Hence:
qL≦2dK
with the following boundary conditions:
The points P1 and P2 in this case lie in a common radial plane E running through the centers of the rolling bodies of one of the rows. The radial plane E runs through the row in which the smallest radial spacing DA is formed. In the example according to
According to further refinements of the invention,
Table 1 shows exemplary dimensioning of a wheelbearing unit with (geometric) ratios, given as general minimum or maximum ratios, which, up to the time when the invention was made, are not implemented on wheelbearing units of the prior art and which are fulfilled by the exemplary dimensioning.
The present invention will be further understood and appreciated by reading the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
The FIGURE shows a wheelbearing unit for a driven axle according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
The FIGURE shows an exemplary embodiment of the invention in which a wheelbearing unit 1 has a wheel hub 2 with an internal toothing 3, specifying the characteristic quantities essential for the invention. The illustration is in a longitudinal section along the axes of rotation 1a of the wheelbearing units 1 and not true to scale.
The internal toothing 3 on the wheel hub 2 is provided for engagement into an external toothing of a drive journal, not illustrated. The wheel hub 2 is mounted rotatably in the outer part 8 and has a flange 9 for fastening a vehicle wheel, not illustrated, and a brake disk. Seated on the wheel hub 2 are the inner parts 10 in the form of inner rings 6 and 7 which in each case have an outer raceway 13 and 14 for the rolling contact, in each case with one row of rolling bodies 11 in the form of balls. The rolling bodies 11 of a row are guided in a cage 12. The outer part 8 replaces as a flange body the conventional outer ring or outer rings and for this purpose has the inner raceways 15 and/or 16 for rolling contact with the rolling bodies 11. The outer part 8 is provided with a flange 17 for the vehicle-side fastening of the wheel bearing unit 1.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 036 674 | Aug 2005 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2006/001344 | 8/2/2006 | WO | 00 | 2/27/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/014554 | 2/8/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20060120650 | Niebling et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080226213 | Niebling et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2329554 X | Jan 1975 | DE |
10054421 X | May 2002 | DE |
10129709 X | Jan 2003 | DE |
202004020400 X | Jun 2005 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080310785 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |