The present disclosure generally pertains to restraining a vehicle at a loading dock and more specifically to a wheel chock system.
When a truck, trailer or some other vehicle is parked at a loading dock, often some sort of vehicle restraint is used to keep the truck from inadvertently moving away from an elevated platform of the dock. This allows a forklift truck to safely drive between the dock platform and the truck for the purpose of loading or unloading the cargo inside the truck.
There are a variety of vehicle restraints available that can be installed at a loading dock for engaging the truck's RIG (Rear Impact Guard), also known as an ICC bar. An ICC bar is a beam that extends horizontally across the rear of a truck, just below the truck bed. Its primary purpose is to prevent an automobile from under-riding the truck in a rear-end collision. However, not all trucks have an ICC bar that can be readily engaged by an ICC-style restraint. Moreover, ICC bars are not prevalent outside the United States, so in those cases a wheel restraint can be used for blocking one or more of the truck's wheels.
Perhaps the most common wheel restraint is simply a wheel chock that wedges between the driveway and the underside of the wheel. However, wheel chocks often slip out of position on driveways that are slippery due to oil, rain, ice, sand, gravel or dirt. Moreover, wheel chocks usually are loose items that do not permanently attach to the loading dock area, so they often get misplaced.
One known example wheel restraint includes a wheel chock that is coupled to the loading dock by way of an articulated arm. To help prevent the chock from slipping out of its wheel-blocking position, the chock can be placed in mating engagement upon a serrated base plate that is anchored to the driveway. Although such a system can be effective, it does have some drawbacks.
First, a counterweight spring on the arm tends to prevent the wheel chock from resting its full weight upon the base plate. Second, the length to which the arm must extend to reach the wheel can adversely affect the angular relationship (about a vertical axis) between the mating surfaces of the chock and base plate. Third, although the known wheel restraint may include a sensor for detecting the presence of a wheel, the sensor does not indicate whether the chock is fully engaged with the serrations of the base plate. Finally, dirt, ice and other contaminants could hinder the engagement between the chock and the base plate, thus reducing the effectiveness of the chock.
Wheel restraint 10 includes a wheel chock 22 that may, for example, rest upon a base 24 (lower support surface) when restraint 10 is in the holding position of
To assist the repositioning of chock 22 between the holding and release positions, an elevated articulated arm 30 couples chock 22 to an anchor 32 that is attached to dock 16. Various joints of arm 30, anchor 32 and/or chock 22 enable chock 22 to be moved in three-dimensional space. To ensure that chock 22 can rest flat upon base 24, a joint 34 coupling arm 30 to chock 22, as shown in
To further assist the manual repositioning of chock 22, a spring 42 coupled to arm 30 helps offset the weight of chock 22 and arm 30. Counteracting the weight of arm 30 and chock 22 can be helpful while positioning chock 22; however, counteracting that weight is not always desired. The weight of arm 30 and chock 22, for instance, can actually be useful in holding chock 22 solidly against base 24. Thus, a spring release device 44 might be added so that spring 42 can be selectively stressed (
When chock 22 is in the holding position of
A brush 88 mounted to a movable arm 90 can be used to sweep dirt from base 84. One end 92 of arm 90 is pivotally coupled to an anchor 94. An opposite end 96 of arm 90 provides a cam surface 98 against which wheel 12 can push so that as a vehicle backs into the loading dock, the engagement of wheel 12 against cam surface 98 forces brush 88 to sweep across base 84. When the vehicle departs, a spring 100 can be used to pull arm 90 back to its position of
In this example, to restrict relative lateral movement (e.g., movement in a horizontal direction) between chock 116 and base 118 when chock 116 is in the blocking position (
In this example, the first vertical resistance feature is an underside 128 of a bar 130 that overlies teeth 124 on base 118. The second vertical resistance feature, in this example, is a distal end 132 of a pivotal member 134 that is hinged to chock 116 such that member 134 can pivot between a latched position (
In the latched position, distal end 132 extends underneath bar 130 into a plurality gaps 135 between bar 130 and base 118 and engages or contacts the under surface 128 to inhibit vertical separation between chock 116 and base 118. With chock 116 in the blocking position and pivotal member 134 in the latched position, wheel restraint system 114 limits relative translation between chock 116 and base 118 in every direction of translation, e.g., straight upward and downward, straight forward and backward (left/right in
Although second vertical resistance feature on chock 116 is shown as a pivotal member 134 that is hinged to chock 116, the second vertical resistance feature could also be a push-pull U-shaped bar that is pushed through gaps 135 and into engagement with chock 116 to a latched position. The U-shaped bar is then pulled out of chock 116 and gaps 135 to an unlatched position, allowing chock 116 to be moved to its release position.
To ease manual lifting of chock 116, some examples of wheel restraint system 114 includes a spring loaded articulated arm 136 that couples chock 116 to an anchor 138. Although spring loaded articulated arm 136 may make chock 116 easier to lift and/or move manually, spring loaded arm 136 may also apply forces to chock 116 that would tend to lift chock 116 up and/or away from base 118 when chock 116 is in its blocking position. The engagement between the first and second vertical resistance features resists these biasing forces, helping to prevent chock 116 from lifting up and/or away from base 118.
Some examples of chock 116 include a sensor 140 that provides a signal for indicating whether pivotal member 134 is in the latched or unlatched position. Examples of sensor 140 include, but are not limited to, a photoelectric eye, a limit switch, a Hall-Effect proximity sensor, etc.
One example sequence of operation begins with the vehicle backing toward dock face 18 with wheel 12 rolling over the top of base 118, as shown in
In this example, to restrict relative horizontal movement between chock 144 and base 118 when chock 144 is in the blocking position (
In this example, the first vertical resistance feature is underside 128 of bar 130 that overlies teeth 124 on base 118. The second vertical resistance feature, in this example, is a protrusion 146 that extends from the side of chock 144 and by repositioning chock 144 can be selectively positioned between a latched position (
In the latched position, protrusion 146 extends underneath bar 130 and engages or contacts the underside 126 of bar 130 to inhibit vertical separation or movement between chock 144 and base 118. With chock 144 in the blocking position and protrusion 146 in the latched position, wheel restraint system 142 limits relative translation between chock 144 and base 118. In the unlatched position, protrusion 146 is moved out from underneath bar 130, which allows chock 144 to be readily lifted off of, and/or moved away from base 118. To ease manual lifting of chock 144, some examples of wheel restraint system 142 include spring loaded articulated arm 136 that couples chock 144 to anchor 138. Although spring loaded articulated arm 136 may make chock 116 easier to lift and move manually, spring loaded arm 136 may also apply forces to chock 116 that would tend to lift chock 116 up and away from base 118 when chock 116 is in its blocking position. The engagement between the first and second vertical resistance features resists these biasing forces, helping to prevent chock 116 from lifting up and/or away from base 118.
One example sequence of operation begins with the vehicle backing toward dock face 18 with wheel 12 rolling over the top of base 118, as shown in
In this example, to restrict relative horizontal movement between chock 150 and base 152 when chock 150 is in the blocking position (
In this example, the first vertical resistance feature is an underside edge 154 of base 152. The second vertical resistance feature, in this example, is an L-shaped bracket 156 that extends from the side of chock 150 and by repositioning chock 150 can be selectively positioned between a latched position (
In the latched position, bracket 156 extends or engages underneath edge 154 to inhibit vertical separation between chock 150 and base 152. With chock 150 in the blocking position and bracket 156 in the latched position, wheel restraint system 148 limits relative translation between chock 150 and base 152. In the unlatched position, bracket 156 is moved out from underneath edge 154, which allows chock 150 to be readily lifted off of base 152. To ease manual lifting of chock 150, some examples of wheel restraint system 148 includes spring loaded articulated arm 136 that couples chock 150 to anchor 138. Although spring loaded articulated arm 136 may make chock 116 easier to lift and move manually, spring loaded arm 136 may also apply forces to chock 116 that would tend to lift chock 116 up and away from base 118 when chock 116 is in its blocking position. The engagement between the first and second vertical resistance features resists these biasing forces, helping to prevent chock 116 from lifting up and/or away from base 118.
One example sequence of operation begins with the vehicle backing toward dock face 18 with wheel 12 rolling over the top of base 152, as shown in
Some of the aforementioned examples may include one or more features and/or benefits including, but not limited to, the following:
In some examples, a wheel chock for restraining a vehicle at a loading dock is supported by a spring loaded articulated arm, wherein the spring force can be released.
In some examples, a wheel chock is supported by an articulated arm that includes a pivotal joint where the arm connects to the chock, wherein the joint permits the chock to rotate relative to the arm about a vertical axis.
In some examples, a wheel chock includes a sensor that detects whether the chock is fully engaged with a lower support surface.
In some examples, a manually manipulated wheel chock is coupled to a hydraulic cylinder that can forcibly draw the chock against a vehicle's wheel.
In some examples, a wheel chock can be manually placed upon a mating base plate, and a hydraulic cylinder can move the plate to force the chock against a vehicle's wheel.
In some examples, a set of hooks or latches selectively engage and release a wheel chock from a lower support surface that is anchored to the ground.
In some examples, a manually operated wheel chock includes a cleaning system that inhibits debris, ice and other contaminants from accumulating on a surface upon which the chock is placed.
In some examples, a wheel chock includes a first plurality of teeth that engage a second plurality of teeth of a base anchored to the ground to substantially limit and preferably prevent movement of the wheel chock relative to the base in a first direction and a protrusion to engage a surface of the base to prevent movement of the wheel chock relative to the base in a second direction different than the first direction.
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1102773 | Martin | Jul 1914 | A |
2413744 | Carter | Jan 1947 | A |
2773564 | Garard, Sr. | Dec 1956 | A |
2858905 | Fahland | Nov 1958 | A |
3110466 | O'Sullivan | Nov 1963 | A |
3221907 | O'Sullivan | Dec 1965 | A |
3305049 | Willey | Feb 1967 | A |
3447639 | Parr | Jun 1969 | A |
3542157 | Noah | Nov 1970 | A |
3666118 | Raynes et al. | May 1972 | A |
3667160 | Salloum | Jun 1972 | A |
3797410 | Blunden | Mar 1974 | A |
4013145 | Mumm | Mar 1977 | A |
4024820 | Hilnsky et al. | May 1977 | A |
4122629 | Rennick | Oct 1978 | A |
4146888 | Grunewald et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4191503 | Neff et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4207019 | Cone | Jun 1980 | A |
4208161 | Hipp et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4216724 | Grillet | Aug 1980 | A |
4264259 | Hipp | Apr 1981 | A |
4267748 | Grunewald et al. | May 1981 | A |
4282621 | Anthony et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4373847 | Hipp et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4379354 | Hahn et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4443150 | Hahn et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4472099 | Hahn et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4560315 | Hahn | Dec 1985 | A |
4572080 | Williams et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4605353 | Hahn et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4634334 | Hahn et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4653967 | Isaksson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4674929 | Blund | Jun 1987 | A |
4674941 | Hageman | Jun 1987 | A |
4676344 | Locicero | Jun 1987 | A |
4679974 | Blunden | Jul 1987 | A |
4695216 | Erlandsson | Sep 1987 | A |
4728242 | Erlandsson | Mar 1988 | A |
4759678 | Hageman | Jul 1988 | A |
4765792 | Cherry et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4767254 | Kovach et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4784567 | Hageman et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4815918 | Bennett et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
RE32968 | Hahn | Jun 1989 | E |
4854790 | Andre | Aug 1989 | A |
4861217 | Erlandsson | Aug 1989 | A |
4865508 | Carlson | Sep 1989 | A |
RE33154 | Hahn et al. | Jan 1990 | E |
4915568 | West | Apr 1990 | A |
RE33242 | Hipp et al. | Jun 1990 | E |
4938647 | Erlandsson | Jul 1990 | A |
4963068 | Gelder | Oct 1990 | A |
4969792 | Ellis et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4973213 | Erlandsson | Nov 1990 | A |
4979856 | Blunden et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5037255 | Bullock et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5096021 | Tart | Mar 1992 | A |
5249905 | Warner et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5302063 | Winsor | Apr 1994 | A |
5375965 | Springer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5464076 | Benedetto, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5531557 | Springer | Jul 1996 | A |
5547045 | Stutzman | Aug 1996 | A |
5582498 | Springer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5655631 | Richardson | Aug 1997 | A |
5685397 | Maddox et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689981 | DeLuca et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692402 | Clements | Dec 1997 | A |
5709518 | Alexander et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711110 | Williams et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5743697 | Alexander | Apr 1998 | A |
5762459 | Springer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5896957 | Berends et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908274 | Silberman | Jun 1999 | A |
5934857 | Alexander | Aug 1999 | A |
6082952 | Alexander | Jul 2000 | A |
6092970 | Hahn et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6123496 | Alexander | Sep 2000 | A |
6199668 | Gorza et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6238163 | Springer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250432 | Hageman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276496 | Hageman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
RE37570 | Springer et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6357987 | Palus | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371253 | Berends et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6505713 | Paul et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
7032720 | Jette et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7264092 | Jette | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20060051196 | McDonald | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090026022 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090223764 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100260586 | Manone et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1308222 | Oct 1992 | CA |
2164737 | Jun 1997 | CA |
2164738 | Jun 1997 | CA |
2419680 | Aug 2003 | CA |
583404 | Sep 1933 | DE |
2735826 | Feb 1979 | DE |
205852 | Jan 1984 | DE |
3830891 | Mar 1990 | DE |
4120035 | Dec 1992 | DE |
4119480 | Jan 1993 | DE |
4242415 | Feb 1994 | DE |
4401653 | Oct 1995 | DE |
4427406 | Oct 1995 | DE |
0025399 | Mar 1983 | EP |
0284532 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0302356 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0366571 | May 1990 | EP |
0384850 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0442245 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0537075 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0580415 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0609049 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0639488 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0775653 | May 1997 | EP |
1095880 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1469877 | Feb 1967 | FR |
2284481 | Apr 1976 | FR |
2394423 | Jan 1979 | FR |
2652340 | Sep 1989 | FR |
2672578 | Aug 1992 | FR |
2689845 | Oct 1993 | FR |
2736336 | Jan 1997 | FR |
1169298 | Nov 1969 | GB |
526008 | May 1955 | IT |
60036230 | Feb 1985 | JP |
157253 | Jun 1968 | NL |
1036593 | Aug 1983 | SU |
9518029 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9612665 | May 1996 | WO |
9702201 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9744220 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9749627 | Dec 1997 | WO |
2004078618 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2009014815 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120006632 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |