This application is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/000134, filed Jan. 18, 2014, which designated the United States and has been published as International Publication No. WO 2014/124724 and which claims the priority of German Patent Application, Serial No. 10 2013 002 705.5, filed Feb. 16, 2013, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d).
The invention relates to a wheel suspension for a steered or non-steered rear wheel of a two-track motor vehicle according to the preamble of patent claim 1.
From DE 10 2010 030 292 A1, a generic wheel suspension for a rear wheel of a two-track motor vehicle is known. The wheel suspension includes a five-link assembly, having five individual links. The individual links are hinged to the vehicle body by bearings situated on the vehicle body and to the wheel carrier of the rear wheel via bearings situated on the wheel-carrier. In the direction of travel, the five-link assembly includes a front pair of links and a rear pair of links. The front pair of links includes a lower front link and an upper front link with regard to the rear wheel axis of rotation. The rear pair of links includes a lower rear link and an upper rear link. A suspension arm is arranged in a lower link level in longitudinal direction of the vehicle between the two pairs of links. Furthermore, a spring arm is directly hinged to the wheel carrier of the rear wheel.
It is an object of the invention to provide a wheel suspension for a rear wheel of a two-track motor vehicle, in which an advantageous wheel toe and camber behavior is achieved as a result of lateral forces and longitudinal forces acting on the rear wheels.
The object is achieved by the features of the independent patent claim. Advantageous embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the subclaims.
According to the independent patent claim, a lower spring link is arranged in longitudinal direction of the vehicle between the front pair of links and the rear pair of links, on which lower spring link a spring arrangement is supported which includes a vibration damper and a suspension spring. The front pair of links, in terms of arrangement relative to the spring link, is designed softer in transverse direction of the vehicle than the rear pair of links. As a result of the fact that front pair of links is softer in transverse direction than the rear pair of links, an elastokinematic advantageous toe-in change can be achieved under the influence of a lateral force.
To further improve wheel toe and camber behavior of the vehicle under the influence of longitudinal and lateral forces acting on the rear wheels, the upper front link of the front pair of links and the upper rear link of the rear pair of links can be arranged in v-shape, when viewed from the top, so as to form an opening angle in outward transverse direction of the vehicle. The same applies to the lower front link as well as the lower rear link (i.e., the track rod), which can be arranged in outward transverse direction of the vehicle in v-shape, when viewed from the top, so as to form a further opening angle.
Due to the above described angled arrangement of the links, the two upper links form an upper triangle and the two lower links form a lower triangle. When viewed from the top the upper triangle and the lower triangle can overlap so as to form a joint cutting area. With regard to an advantageous wheel toe and camber behavior, it has proven useful when the spring link is at least partly, in particular essentially entirely arranged within the joint cutting area of the two triangles.
To achieve an advantageous toe-in change during application of a lateral force or a longitudinal force acting on the rear wheel, it is also advantageous when the rotation axis of the rear wheel is arranged between the front pair of links and the rear pair of links, when viewed in longitudinal direction of the vehicle.
In an embodiment, the suspension spring and the vibration damper can be jointly integrated within a suspension strut, which itself is situated between the vehicle body and the lower spring link. On the other hand, the suspension spring and the vibration damper may be supported separately from one another on the lower spring link. The connecting point of the suspension strut or of the separately arranged suspension spring and vibration damper is therefore arranged below the rotation axis of the wheel.
Due to the support on the lower spring link, the suspension spring and the vibration damper are arranged in a low installation position. Thereby, advantages with regard to installation space are achieved in the rear part of the vehicle.
The lower spring link and the lower front link can converge in a lower intersecting point when virtually extended. The upper front link and the upper rear link can also converge in an upper point of intersection virtually extended. The two points of intersection define a steering axle about which the rear wheel rotates during a toe-in change. With respect to a wheel contact point (i.e., between the vehicle wheel and a road surface), the steering axle can be arranged offset outwardly in transverse direction of the vehicle by a transverse offset. As a result, the rear wheel assumes toe-in position when exerting a longitudinal force (i.e., during braking or recuperating mode).
In general, during movement of the vehicle the drive force acts on the wheel center of the rear wheel via the articulated shaft. On the other hand during the braking process the braking force does not act on the wheel center but on the wheel contact point of the rear wheel. This results in different leverage effects on the rear axle during braking and driving. In conventional rear axle link geometries these lead to respectively reversed kinematic behavior. In contrast, due to the special link-geometry of the rear axle according to the invention, an essentially same kinematic behavior is achieved during braking and driving.
The wheel suspension can also include a U-shaped stabilizer bar. This stabilizer can include a pivotally supported middle section, which is oriented in transverse direction of the vehicle, and output legs which protrude from the middle section in longitudinal direction of the vehicle. The output legs can be directly, or as an alternative also indirectly, flexibly connected to the link of the suspension wheel via a substantially vertically extending rod. Advantageously, the output legs of the stabilizer bar can be connected to the upper front link by the vertically extending coupling rod.
In the case of the front pair of links, the upper front link can be set back relative to the lower front link by a longitudinal offset in longitudinal direction of the vehicle. On the other hand in the case of the rear pair or links, the rear upper link and the rear lower link, i.e., the track rod, may not be arranged one after another, but may be arranged so as to cross over when viewed from the top.
The advantageous embodiments of the invention described above and/or in the subclaims can—except in cases of clear dependencies or incompatible alternatives—be used individually or in combination with each other.
The invention and its advantageous embodiments and refinements as well as their advantages are described in the following by way of drawings.
It is shown in:
According to
A lower spring link 16 is arranged between both pairs of links I, II when viewed in driving direction FR. According to
As further shown in the Figures, the upper front link 20 and the upper rear link 22 are arranged in v-shape relative to one another when viewed from the top, with the V having opening outwardly in transverse direction y of the vehicle with an opening angle αup (
According to
According to
The front pair of links I, regarding its arrangement relative to the spring link 16, is softer in transverse direction y of the vehicle than the rear pair of links II. The front pair of links I, which is transversely softer than the rear pair of links II, favors a toe-in change V at the rear wheel 19 when exerting a lateral force FS as indicated in
In addition, in the front pair of links I, the upper link 20 is set back in longitudinal direction x of the vehicle relative to the lower front link 14 by a longitudinal offset Δx1 (
As shown in
The, legs 36b of the stabilizer 36 which protrude in opposite direction of travel FR backwards and obliquely outwardly, are pivotally connected at their free ends to the upper front link 20 of the wheel suspension via a respective upwardly projecting rod 40 (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 002 705 | Feb 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/000134 | 1/18/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/124724 | 8/21/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4444415 | von der Ohe | Apr 1984 | A |
4930804 | Tattermusch | Jun 1990 | A |
7048286 | Eppelein | May 2006 | B2 |
7891684 | Luttinen et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7963538 | Roland | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8646787 | Langhoff | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8925945 | Mohrlock et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8967670 | Mohrlock et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9096273 | Mohrlock | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9108482 | Mohrlock et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20040140641 | Eppelein | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050275183 | Amano | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20100133775 | Roland | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20150165862 | Schindler et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150191071 | Schindler et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150224841 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150375590 | Mohrlock | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2776728 | May 2006 | CN |
101001764 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101186175 | May 2008 | CN |
35 09 145 | Sep 1986 | DE |
38 26 930 | Mar 1989 | DE |
44 08 571 | Sep 1994 | DE |
100 05 407 | Sep 2000 | DE |
100 05 472 | Aug 2001 | DE |
100 14 878 | Sep 2001 | DE |
101 33 424 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10 2010 050 749 | Jun 2011 | DE |
10 2010 030 292 | Dec 2011 | DE |
1 197 358 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 364 816 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 741 577 | Jan 2007 | EP |
2 423 009 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2005-112258 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-35874 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2008-168891 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009-29257 | Feb 2009 | JP |
WO 2012164373 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued by the European Patent Office in International Application PCT/EP2014/000134. |
Chinese Search Report issued on Jul. 20, 2016 with respect to counterpart Chinese patent application 201480008595.3. |
Translation of Chinese Search Report issued on Jul. 20, 2016 with respect to counterpart Chinese patent application 201480008595.3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150375589 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |