The present invention relates to, in general, an improved rim for wheelbarrow applications. In particular this invention refers to an improvement in rims for wheelbarrow, the rims having central radial ribs to withstand heavier loads. Even more specifically, it relates to rims fitted with five central ribs, and being of a geometric shape different from the currently existing rims.
In the state of the art there have been several manufacturing problems regarding wheelbarrow rims. The wheelbarrow rims that have prevailed in the market have completely flat sides and/or flat sections as shown in
On the other hand, there have been unsuccessful attempts to create rims without flat sides, specifically U.S. Pat. No. 2,603,267 which shows a rim featuring, a series of pieces having a series of holes as shown in FIG. 2 of said document. This particular rim is handicapped by a lower moment of inertia (the measurement of the rotational inertia of a body), as calculated by the parallel axis theorem, which results in a reduced loading capacity and the need of sheets of higher gauge for manufacturing, which in turn makes it heavier.
Furthermore the state of the art does not demonstrates the existence of a rim made of a metal sheet-gauge 19 (1.02 mm) that can pass the performance tests required by standards, and the resistance and distortion criteria; in addition, there is no evidence in the state of the art of the existence of central ribs or changes in the shaping radiuses form.
Therefore, no rim with central ribs and changes in the shaping radiuses form exist in the state of the art.
The main object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim having central ribs.
A second object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim having innovative shaping radiuses.
A third object of the present invention, is the production of a wheelbarrow rim having five central ribs.
A fourth object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim geometrically configured to fit the wheelbarrow tires that currently exist in the market.
A fifth object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim manufactured from a thin sheet, as opposed to the rims of the state of the art.
A sixth object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim having a greater moment of inertia, compared with the rims of the state of the art.
A seventh object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim that, by means of a greater moment of inertia, has a greater loading capacity.
An eight object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim that is formed by a three-step die, and the forming process is by drawing, central pivot-punching, and final cutting.
A ninth object of the present invention is the production of a wheelbarrow rim which optimizes the raw materials used in its manufacturing without negatively impacting the quality and performance of the product.
Lastly, other object of the present invention is the production of a wheelcart rim that imparts a sense of movement thanks to the central ribs.
Additional advantages shall be evident form, the attached claims.
In order to provide a better understanding of the invention, the following drawings are attached:
It is understood that the present invention is not limited to a wheelbarrow rim as described. The knowledge of the present invention may be applied to the manufacturing of other types of rims, wherein the ribs may provide a technical advantage as described herein.
In the present invention there are references to inertia (I symbol), which is a measurement of the rotational inertia of a body, specifically, the wheelbarrow rim. When a body turns around one of the main inertia axis (the rim turns by means of bearings), the rotational inertia may be represented as a scalar magnitude known as moment of inertia. However, in the present case the rotational inertia has to be represented through a set of inertia moments and components that constitute the inertia tensor. The moment of inertia reflects the mass distribution of a rim or a rotating particle system, in relation to a turning axis (bearings). The moment of inertia only depends on the geometry of the body, and the position of the turning axis, it does not depend on the forces that intervene in the movement. The roles of the moment of inertia and the inertial mass are analogous in regards to the rectilinear and uniform movements.
For calculating the moment of inertia, we use the Parallel Axis Theorem (Steiner's Theorem, named after Jakob Steiner) where the moment of inertia of an area, arc or volume in relation to any axis is equal to the moment of inertia in relation to a parallel axis that passes through the centroid plus the product of the area, arc length or volume multiplied by the squared distance between the two parallel axis. Specifically, the present rim consists of an area and a series of arcs, thus the moment of inertia was calculated as follows:
1. Dividing the compounded area in various single parts.
2. Determining the areas of the parts.
3. Determining the coordinates of the center of mass of such parts in relation to the axis X and Y. Then calculating the center of mass of the entire shape formed by all the above partial areas.
4. Calculating the distances of the center of mass of each area in relation to the total center of mass of the shape.
5. Calculating the moments of inertia of the parts in relation to their center of mass axis (which will be parallel to X and Y).
6. Calculating the moment of inertia of each part in relation to the axis X and Y, by applying Steiner's Theorem of parallel axis.
7. Calculating the moments of inertia of the compounded area from the above moments of inertia.
The wheelbarrow rim is described as if formed only by a single section as illustrated in
The following table corresponds to
To calculate the moment of inertia of an arc, the following formula is used:
The moment of inertia is obtained by Formula 1, and then by applying the parallel axis theorem in Equation 2:
I=Ī+Ad2 (2)
the moment of inertia I of Table 1 is obtained.
In Table 1 the ΣA is 5.6045 cm2 while ΣI is 257.632 cm4.
Please note that although different parts of the rim section are mentioned, said rim consists of a single piece manufactured by the following steps: drawing, central pivot-punching and final cutting.
The rim formed by the sections as illustrated in
Please note that in the section where the base surface section (5) and the curvature section “a” (6) are formed, once the central radial rib section (3) ends, a section is formed which transitions from a curvature direction to another, which advantageously increases the moment of inertia of said portion.
To calculate the moment of inertia of an arc, the following formula is used:
The moment of inertia is obtained by Formula 3, and then by applying the parallel axis theorem of Equation 4:
I=Ī+Ad2 (4)
This results in the moment of inertia I of Table 2.
In Table 2, ΣA is 7.4740 cm2, while ΣI is 280.510 cm4.
The following is a comparison between FIG. 1—Table 1, and FIG. 2—Table 2:
Equation (5) corresponds to the bending resistance of a component, and Equation (6) the maximum applied force to an element given the moment of inertia, and the distance of the general center of gravity of the geometry to the specific center of gravity of each geometric element that forms the rim. Where, for Equations 5 and 6:
Mmax=Maximum momentum
σ=Bending resistance
Ix=Moment of Inertia
c=Distance of the general centroid to the specific center of gravity of each geometry that forms the rim.
d=Distahce of the maximum force applied to the general center of gravity of the geometry.
Since in both equations the loads and bending resistance of the material are constant, we assumed that by performing variations in the geometry of the piece, significant improvements in the resistance of the component can be achieved. Hence, we propose a new geometry of the rim, and evaluate the resistance criteria given by Equations 5 and 6, where the resistance is directly proportional to the increase of the general moment of inertia of the shape.
The distortion criteria were determined through field experiments, where the structural stability of the component was verified under cyclical constant loads or fluctuating intensity loads.
It is inferred that the greater the moment of inertia, the greater the load capacity. It is obvious that the ribs proposed in the present invention increase the load capacity. Although the proposed rim is made of a metal sheet gauge 19 (1.02 mm), compared to the rim of the state of the art made of a metal sheet gauge 18 (1.21 mm), it has a greater moment of inertia, and therefore, a greater load capacity. This is achieved through the proposed ribs, and the geometry of the rim.
Please note that each of the radial central ribs described herein has the same dimensions, as well as rib lateral steps and rib steps, therefore, the description is not limited to explain a single central rib, but applies to all of them.
The present description details a wheelbarrow rim formed by fitting together two portions made of a metal sheet gauge 19, a that also saves production material.
The radial central ribs described in the preferred embodiment of the invention have a semi-rectangular shape with rounded edges, where the portion closer to the rim neck tries to even up the front side, and forms the step until reaching the opposite side, as shown in the figure. However, other radial central rib shapes (i.e. triangular, square, semi-circular) may be designed when taking advantage of the teachings of the present invention, and with similar moments of inertia would fall within the scope of protection sought hereby.
The geometric configuration of the present invention is the preferred one, that is, the curvatures as shown in the figures of the preferred embodiment. However, rims with curvatures different from the teachings of the present invention may be developed, and would fall within the scope of protection sought.
For the present invention, a metal sheet gauge 19, SAE 1010 is preferred for manufacturing the rim, as well as the above described ribs and geometry. However, with the teachings of the present invention different materials and gauges may be used in manufacturing the rims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MX/U/2011/000207 | May 2011 | MX | national |