Whirlpool reduction cap

Abstract
A whirlpool reduction cap. The cap for redirecting fluid flow towards an exit port or drain in a vessel comprises a top solid surface area greater than or equal to the area of the exit port, a base connected to the exit port, a side wall positioned between the top surface and the exit port, and an inlet positioned in the side wall, thereby reducing formation of a vortex as a fluid is drained from the vessel.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates, in general, to mixing and holding vessels and, more particularly, to an apparatus that redirects fluid flow through an exit port of a vessel for reducing or eliminating vortex formation as a fluid is drained from the vessel.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Various means for mixing fluids are known in the art. Both intrusive and non-intrusive means have been used to mix fluids, including colloidal suspensions, to prevent separation of homogeneous solutions into constituent components and/or to reconstitute solutions that have separated into constituent elements. Intrusive mixing devices, or those objects and devices which are inserted into a fluid to agitate the fluid with the assistance of an external power source, are well known. Such devices involve the use of intrusive mechanical mixers powered by electric or pneumatic motors. These devices provide relatively high torque and/or rotation of the fluid and may result in adverse effects on the fluid as a result of the formation of a significant vortex or whirlpool in the fluid. Moreover, when a fluid is drained from a holding vessel through a drain in a vertical direction, typically, pockets of little or no fluid movement may be created at the base of the holding vessel.




In some chemical environments, further adverse effects of intrusive agitation can be seen in the form of foaming or gelling of the body of fluid while it is being mixed in a mixing tank or similar holding vessel. Such foaming or gelling may change the parameters of fluids' various chemical compositions and adversely affect their performance. Additionally, intrusive mixing devices and methods may introduce air into the mixture or fluid and may cause oxidation of certain chemical mixtures thereby changing the chemical reactivity of the fluid.




Fluids, and in particular, colloidal suspensions such as slurries used in Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) of semiconductor wafers are most effective when delivered to CMP tools in a homogenous state with no air in the supply line delivering fluid to these tools.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one embodiment the invention provides a whirlpool reduction cap comprising a top solid surface greater than or equal to the area of an exit port in a vessel, a base connected to the exit port, a side wall positioned between the top surface and the base. An inlet is positioned in the side wall which may comprise one or more orifices.




The invention has particular applicability for mixing and delivery of colloidal suspensions, including slurries used in CMP of semiconductor wafers. Such colloidal suspensions are notorious for separating from homogeneous distribution into constituent chemical components. More generally, however, the invention may be used in numerous other applications requiring homogeneous fluids, and it is not contemplated that the invention would be limited to slurry or CMP applications.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Preferred non limiting embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is an isometric view of an embodiment showing, in combination, a multiple jet mixer and the whirlpool reduction cap of the present invention;





FIG. 2

illustrates a top front perspective view of a whirlpool reduction cap of the present invention;





FIG. 3

illustrates a bottom front perspective view of a whirlpool reduction cap as shown in

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

illustrates a cross-sectional side view of the whirlpool reduction cap as shown in

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 5

illustrates a side bottom perspective view of another embodiment of the whirlpool reduction cap of the present invention;





FIG. 6

illustrates a cross-sectional side view of the whirlpool reduction cap shown in

FIG. 5

installed in a vessel;





FIG. 7

illustrates a top plan view of another embodiment of a whirlpool reduction cap, with a bottom view shown in dashed lines; and





FIG. 8

illustrates an exploded side view of the whirlpool reduction cap shown in

FIG. 7

installed in a vessel.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a whirlpool reduction cap comprising a top solid surface, a base, a side wall and an inlet positioned in the side wall. The whirlpool reduction cap is positioned over an exit port in a mixing or holding vessel in order to redirect fluid flow as the fluid is withdrawn from the vessel. As used herein, the term “fluid” includes liquids, liquid/liquid mixtures, chemical compositions, liquid/solid mixtures, colloidal suspensions and slurries, and similar solutions. When a fluid is drained from a vessel, a vortex typically forms in the fluid above and along the center line of the exit port. As the fluid level decreases, the vortex tends to draw air into the exit port which may result in oxidation of certain chemical mixtures thereby changing the chemical reactivity of the fluid. In particular, air entrapped in colloidal suspensions used in the CMP of semiconductor wafers reduces the efficiency of the suspension when delivered to CMP tools. The whirlpool reduction cap creates multiple vortices that tend to cancel each other out and may reduce or eliminate a typical vortex. By redirecting fluid flow, the whirlpool reduction cap may also reduce the amount of solid buildup or caking that may deposit along the walls of the vessel as may occur while draining colloidal suspensions. The whirlpool reduction cap may, therefore, assist in delivering homogeneous colloidal suspensions, as well as other fluids, to their destination.




The whirlpool reduction cap may be used with any holding or mixing vessel including intrusive and non-intrusive mixing vessels. The vessel may have any conventional cross-sectional shape including, but not limited to circular, square or rectangular. Similarly, the vessel base may have any shape such as, for example, flat or conical. Further, the whirlpool reduction cap may also be used in conjunction with a filter or other device positioned within or near the vessel.




The whirlpool reduction cap may be comprised of any suitable known material such as, for example, polymers, steel, metal, and the like. The material is preferably compatible with both the vessel and the fluid. The whirlpool reduction cap has a top solid surface with an area that is preferably greater than or equal to the open area of the exit port. As used herein, the term “solid” is defined as having little or no openings in order to redirect a majority of fluid flow away from the center line of the exit port. The top solid surface may be of any shape such as, for example, square, hemispherical, or pyramidal.




The whirlpool reduction cap may comprise one or more side walls of any shape including, for example, irregular or perpendicular to the top surface and/or the vessel base. The side wall is positioned between the top solid surface and the cap base and may extend to any height above the vessel base and is preferably perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the exit port. Preferably, the side wall has sufficient height to accommodate an inlet that allows fluid to flow through the exit port without a significant reduction in fluid volume throughput. As used herein, the phrase “significant reduction” means the volume of flow through the exit port is not restricted by more than about 5%.




The inlet in the side wall may comprise one or more orifices and are preferably sized to allow maximum fluid flow through the exit port. The one or more orifices extend from the side wall towards the center of the cap and exit through the base of the cap. The one or more orifices may interconnect within the cap. They may be of any shape and may be located close to or adjacent the cap base to prevent fluid stagnation and solid build-up at the vessel base. Alternatively, the one or more orifices may be positioned and arranged on the side wall so that they are located close to or adjacent the vessel base when installed in the vessel. The vertical plane of the one or more orifices preferably are positioned perpendicular to a horizontal plane of the exit port. The one or more orifices are preferably positioned and arranged to provide balanced flow about the perimeter of the whirlpool reduction cap.




The cap base connects to the exit port of the vessel by any known conventional means. For example, the cap base may comprise a flange for securing the cap to the vessel base by a variety of means including, for example, screws, adhesives and welding. The whirlpool reduction cap may further comprise a chute extending from the base for insertion into the exit port. The chute may be constructed and arranged to press fit into a non-threaded exit port or may comprise a threaded outer surface to mate with a reverse threaded surface in the exit port. Alternatively, the side wall may extend into the exit port.





FIG. 1

represents an embodiment of the present invention. Whirlpool reduction cap


62


is positioned in a vessel


10


above an exit port or drain


14


and assists in controlling the direction of fluid velocity at the exit port


14


. The whirlpool reduction cap aids both in (1) assisting in providing a uniform velocity component, parallel to base


54


of the holding vessel


10


to reduce the amount of solid buildup or caking along the walls of holding vessel


10


and (2) altering the “Coriolis Effect” or formation of a whirlpool or vortex which may form when fluid is drained from holding vessel


10


at base


54


.




To achieve a more uniform distribution of fluid at base


54


of holding vessel


10


, whirlpool reduction cap


62


draws fluid in a parallel orientation to base


54


of holding vessel


10


as shown with streamlines


120


. Whirlpool reduction cap


62


, as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, functions to aid in continual cycling of fluid in the region near the base


54


or exit port


14


of holding vessel


10


.




Holding vessel


10


is depicted in

FIG. 1

as a cylindrical vessel. However, the shape of the holding vessel is not critical in the present invention, and other shaped holding vessels may also be employed. Additionally, although the base of holding vessel


10


is depicted in

FIG. 1

in a conical form, the form of the base is not critical, and other forms, including, but not limited to, hemispherical and truncated forms, may also be used.




The placement of whirlpool reduction cap


62


is illustrated in FIG.


1


. Whirlpool reduction cap


62


is affixed at base


54


of the holding vessel


10


above the exit port


14


. In its second role, the whirlpool reduction cap serves to decrease vortex formation in the fluid body. As fluid or slurry is demanded by a process tool


32


fluid level


20


will decrease. As fluid is continually cycled, the fluid is orientated in a downward direction and velocity toward exit port


14


. This creates what is known as a “Coriolis Effect” in the moving fluid body which is seen as a vortex or whirlpool about a centerline of the drain. A vortex forming in lower fluid levels tends to draw air into supply line


38


as the result of suction created by pump


30


. Any air drawn into outlet line


52


will decrease the overall performance of the fluid delivery system and interfere with inline instrumentation monitoring the performance of the system. If, however, the direction of the fluid velocity at the drain point is altered, the “Coriolis Effect” is changed. The overall velocity direction being perpendicular to the above orientation of the fluid velocity creates multiple vortices, which tend to cancel each other out.




As shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

, whirlpool reduction cap


62


may comprise a formed body


70


ideally made of material that is homogeneous with other components of the mixing apparatus. The whirlpool reduction cap


62


may be affixed at base


54


of holding vessel


10


by conventional means such as, for example, welding, clamping, screwing, and chemical bonding.




Whirlpool reduction cap


62


includes top solid surface


60


, side wall


58


and base


56


. Top solid surface


60


may be any shape, such as, for example, flat, convex, triangular or pyramidal. It is preferable that the surface area of top solid surface


60


be equal to or greater than the open area of exit port


14


. Side wall


58


is positioned between top surface


60


and base


56


and preferably has sufficient height to accommodate an inlet that allows fluid to flow through exit


14


without a significant reduction in fluid volume throughput.




The inlet may comprise one or more orifices


72


in side wall


58


and/or base


56


. Although not necessary, side wall


58


may be perpendicular to vessel base


56


so that the one or more orifices


72


have center planes perpendicular to a center plane of exit port


14


. The one or more orifices


86


extend through side wall


58


to channel fluid through body


70


and into exit port


14


at base


54


of holding vessel


10


as depicted in the cross sectional view shown in FIG.


4


. In one embodiment it is preferred that the inlet allows maximum flow of fluid through exit port


14


. In this embodiment, the sum of the area of one or more orifices is greater than or equal to the open area of exit port


14


. It is also preferred that the one or more orifice is sized and positioned to result in substantially equal flow about the side wall perimeter of the whirlpool reduction cap.




In another embodiment, as illustrated in

FIGS. 5 and 6

, whirlpool reduction cap


62


may also include chute


74


having a channel


76


extending from base


56


of the formed body. Chute


74


may be used to secure whirlpool reduction cap


62


in exit


14


at the base of holding vessel


10


. Chute


74


may be threaded for screwing the whirlpool reduction cap into a threaded drain of holding vessel


10


. Alternatively, chute


74


may be tapered or smooth and may be pressed fit into a non-threaded drain of the holding vessel. Fluid streamlines


120


are redirected to a plane perpendicular to the direction of flow through exit port


14


.




In another embodiment, as illustrated in

FIGS. 7 and 8

, whirlpool reduction cap comprises removable cap


80


. Removable cap


80


has top solid surface


82


, side wall


84


, and base


112


. One or more orifices


86


, sized to allow the fluid to flow through the one or more orifices with out significant reduction in flow through exit port


14


, are positioned on side wall


84


. Flange


88


has threaded holes


90


for affixing the removable cap


80


to process piping


92


that also comprises threaded holes


94


. Removable cap


80


is positioned in gasket


96


that is positioned adjacent vessel insert


102


. Vessel insert


102


comprises threaded holes


106


that receive screws


108


, and aperture


104


sized to receive removable cap


80


. A seal, such as for example an O-ring


98


, is positioned in groove


100


to provide a fluid type seal between the cap


80


and the vessel insert


102


. Screws


108


removably affix process piping


92


, gaskets


96


, removable cap


80


, to vessel insert


102


. When installed, orifices


86


may be positioned close to or adjacent to top surface


110


of vessel insert


102


to reduce or prevent particle sedimentation.




The whirlpool reduction cap


80


may be installed from beneath holding vessel


10


. One such method includes installing insert


102


including an aperture into the vessel and inserting a removable whirlpool reduction cap into the aperture. Alternatively, the insert may be formed as an integral structure of the vessel. A process pipe


92


may then be secured to the whirlpool reduction cap and the insert. Gaskets


98


may be positioned between the whirlpool reduction cap and the insert as well as between the whirlpool reduction cap and the process pipe. Although this embodiment comprises a flange affixed by screws, one of ordinary skill would recognize other means for attaching the whirlpool reduction cap such as, for example, an interlock, a quick connect, and press-fit and various modifications in method and structure would be apparent to one skilled in the art.




The whirlpool reduction cap may be used in conjunction with any fluid vessel such as, for example, vessel containing intrusive and non-intrusive mixers. One such vessel is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,778, and is incorporated herein by reference. As illustrated in

FIG. 1

, fluid is introduced trough delivery line,


22


, and travels through elbow


25


(shown here as a 90° elbow) to mixing junction


24


, and is branched off to each jet


28


through tubing


26


.




Fluid exits jet outlet


29


tangent to an inner surface of the holding vessel


10


. Exiting the jet outlets


29


, the fluid cascades down an internal peripheral wall of holding vessel


10


. Surface adhesion between the fluid and peripheral walls


16


of holding vessel


10


hold the cascading fluid to a peripheral wall


16


until it collides with the fluid body already in holding vessel


10


at fluid level


20


. As fluid cascades down peripheral walls


16


under gravity, the thickness of the fluid stream is reduced to a thin sheet until it collides with the fluid body in the holding vessel and impedes momentum to begin rotating the entire fluid body in holding vessel


10


in a helical pattern toward the base


54


of holding vessel


10


as illustrated in FIG.


1


. The collision of the thin fluid sheet with the overall fluid body reduces folding and splashing and also creates a helical flow which causes homogeneous mixing throughout the vessel.




An outlet connection


14


at base


54


of holding vessel


10


leads to supply line


38


and to a circulating pump


30


, through which fluid is either circulated to tools


32


that will use the fluid, for example in CMP applications where the fluid is a colloidal suspension such as slurry, or recirculated back into holding vessel


10


through supply line


38


to main delivery line


22


and back through the multiple jet mixing assembly where the mixing process beings anew.




The streamlines


120


created from the varied orientation are situated parallel to the base


54


of holding vessel


10


. These streamlines tend to channel fluid towards the exit port which help to provide a lower solid content at the base than without any device. The whirlpool reduction cap


62


reduces the effect of air entrapment by altering the direction of the fluid being drawn into the system through the exit port. This reduction of whirlpool formation helps to assist in the amount of usable slurry volume inside the holding vessel. Also, because the direction of the outgoing slurry is parallel with the base of the holding vessel, a better state of agitation towards the bottom of holding vessel


10


is developed. Slurry at the base holding vessel


10


is drawn into the exit port while upper layers replenish this void resulting in is less likelihood of settling over time through the continuous cycling process.




EXAMPLES




The following examples illustrate embodiments of the invention. This invention is not limited by the examples set forth below. Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings.




Example I




Four Jet Mixer Without Fluid Diverters and Whirlpool Reduction Cap




A holding vessel was prepared without a whirlpool reduction cap. A fluid was recirculated through four jets tangent to the inner surface of the holding vessel. The fluid cascaded down the inner surface of the vessel, impinged the fluid surface and imparted a helical motion to the fluid body. The fluid surface was observed for homogeneity during recirculation. Upon draining the fluid, the vessel was inspected for settling and caking.




a. Materials Used




MEGAflow™ 111B Fixture w/Global Loop Simulator




Four Jet Mixer, Prototype Unit




Atomizer Fixture




Slurry, RODEL QCTT-1011




Sampling Apparatus




b. Procedure




A four jet mixing assembly was fashioned out of existing parts on hand. A ¾″ female thread tapped at the center of the cross, perpendicular to the orientations of the openings. Each of the four openings was reduced to accept ⅜ Flaretek-½″NPT PFA fittings by gluing the appropriate reducers. Approximately 5.1″ of flared ⅜″ PFA tubing was connected to each of the PFA fittings. Each of the PFA tubes were connected to ⅜″ 90° elbows. The entire assembly (in the form of a cross) was mounted so that the center of the cross was colinear to the centerline of the holding vessel. The orientation of the outlets of the elbows (jets) were situated so that the outgoing stream of fluid was tangent to the inner surface of the holding vessel and coplanar to the fluid level. The total area of outgoing fluid was 1.56 times smaller than the standard area of the ¾″ PFA tubing. The orientation of overall fluid rotation was in a counter-clockwise motion.




The plane created by the centerlines of the four individual jets of the mixer body sat 4″ lower than the centerline of the PFA bulkhead at the top of the holding vessel. This reduced the overall initial volume of the slurry body from 23 gallons to 19 gallons.




A global loop ran for 18 hours at 30 psi. In order to speed up overall vessel drainage and reduce any error to the data from settling during a static draining of the holding vessel, the vessel was segmented in 2″ intervals to represent the distribution according to fluid level. The pump was shut off and all valves leading to the system were closed. The holding vessel was drained under static conditions during sample gathering. Two samples of slurry were gathered at each fluid level. A total of 14 pairs of data were collected. The overall time of draining during sample acquisition was about 15 min.




Observations of the fluid surface prior to draining revealed a thin layer of settled material at the center of the fluid surface. The diameter of the settled region was about


4-5


in. and its maximum depth was estimated to be around 0.4 cm. This was attributed to the helical motion of the fluid in the vessel. The velocity of the fluid appeared somewhat slower at the center than at the edges, where fluid from the jets stirs the fluid body.




The vessel was inspected upon completion of draining the slurry to observe any signs of caking on the interior wall or sludge deposits at the base of the vessel. Caking thickness on the interior peripheral wall varied. Where the fluid flow path struck the inner surface and fell downward under gravitational influence there were no signs of caking. The region where caking developed varied from 0.5 to 1.0 mm in thickness. The volume of resulting caking was calculated to be 100 mL. The base of the vessel showed slight signs of sludge buildup. The resulting volume was calculated to be 200 mL.




Example II




Four Jet Mixer with Fluid Diverters and Whirlpool Reduction Cap




The holding vessel of Example I was fitted with a whirlpool reduction cap and flow diverters. Again, the fluid surface was observed for homogeneity during recirculation and upon draining, the vessel was inspected for settling and caking.




a. Materials Used




MEGAflow™ 111b Fixture w/Global Loop Simulator




Four Jet Mixer, Prototype Unit




Whirlpool Reduction Cap, Prototype Unit




PLC Data Fixture




Atomizer Fixture




Slurry, RODEL QCTT-1011




Sampling Apparatus




b. Procedure




A whirlpool reduction cap was fashioned from a 2″ PVC end cap. The lateral side of the cap had four slots approximately ½″ wide and ⅝″ high cut in four equal places.




From previous observations, the center of the fluid body located at the fluid level showed some settling. To increase center homogeneity, two flow diverters were built from ½″ thick natural polypropylene sheets. The diverters were 1.5″×21″. Two sets of ½″ holes were drilled at ⅝″ apart and each set has 14 holes 1.5″ apart.




A Flouroware T-fitting was connected between the inner wall of the holding vessel and the four jet mixer. The T-fitting was reduced to ⅜″ diameter tubing and a Parker PTFE needle valve was mounted at the end. During system operation at 40 psi, the needle valve was allowed to bleed off material at approximately 30 ml/min. This flow represented the demand of the slurry to a tool. It was used for sampling the fluid drawn from the base of the holding vessel during the empirical analysis.




The addition of the whirlpool reduction cap and the flow diverters to the four jet assembly assisted in an improved homogeneity of the colloidal suspension by reducing the overall statistical deviation from±0.11% down to±0.09% non volatile solids. The post drain state of the holding vessel revealed 0.15 L total settled solids. Final improvements over the course of the test showed an order of magnitude (10×) reduction of settled solids which was complemented by the statistical reduction in the overall sampling four-fold.




Example III




Whirlpool Reduction Cap




Initial use and testing of the whirlpool reduction cap were tried during a single jet test with deionized water in order to quell whirlpool formation. During the test of the four jet assembly, when the system was refitted with the diverters and the whirlpool reduction cap, an overall improvement was observed both in the empirical and visual data gathered.




Overall improvements were observed during post test inspection of the drained holding vessel when the whirlpool reduction cap was affixed to the drain. The overall direction of the drainage was changed from a true vertical direction to a nearly planar orientation to the base of the vessel. Fluid drawn into the drain by the pump interacts more with the surface of the holding vessel and thereby inducing agitation in this region. At regions on the surface of the vessel near the outlet, a significant reduction of sludge was observed.



Claims
  • 1. A whirlpool reduction cap positioned in a vessel above an exit port centrally located in a base of the vessel, comprising:a top solid surface greater than or equal to the area of the centrally located exit port in the vessel; a base connected to the exit port; a side wall positioned between the top surface and the base; an inlet positioned in the side wall.
  • 2. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the side wall extends into the vessel.
  • 3. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the base further includes a means for securing the base to the exit port.
  • 4. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the inlet comprises one or more orifices on the side wall.
  • 5. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 4, wherein the sum of the areas of the one or more orifices is equal to or greater than the area of the exit port.
  • 6. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, further comprising at least one orifice in the base.
  • 7. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 6, wherein the sum of the areas of the one or more orifices in the side wall and in the base is equal to or greater then the area of the exit port.
  • 8. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, further comprising a filter.
  • 9. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the side wall is perpendicular to the vessel base.
  • 10. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 9, wherein the one or more inlets has a center plane perpendicular to a center plane of the fluid exit port in the vessel.
  • 11. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the one or more inlets are sized to permit maximum fluid flow through the exit port.
  • 12. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the one or more inlets are positioned to permit balanced flow of fluid through the side wall.
  • 13. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 3, wherein the means for securing the base to the exit port comprises a flange.
  • 14. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 3, wherein the means for securing the base to the exit port comprises a chute.
  • 15. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 3, wherein the means for securing the base to the exit port is removable.
  • 16. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the cap is constructed and arranged for insertion into the exit port of the vessel such that the base is secured to the vessel and a process pipe.
  • 17. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 16, wherein the base further includes a flange.
  • 18. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 16, wherein the cap further comprises a seal.
  • 19. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the inlet is positioned adjacent only the vessel base.
  • 20. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the cap is a formed body.
  • 21. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, wherein the cap is constructed and arranged for insertion into the exit port of the vessel such that the base is secured to the exterior surface of the vessel and a process pipe.
  • 22. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 21, wherein the sum of the areas of the one or more orifices is equal to or greater than the area of the exit port.
  • 23. The whirlpool reduction of claim 22, wherein the one or more inlets has a center plane perpendicular to a center plane of the fluid exit port in the vessel.
  • 24. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, wherein the base further includes a means for securing the base to the exterior surface of the vessel.
  • 25. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, wherein the inlet comprises one or more orifices on the side wall.
  • 26. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, further comprising a filter.
  • 27. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, wherein the side wall is perpendicular to the vessel base.
  • 28. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, wherein the one or more inlets are sized to permit maximum fluid flow through the exit port.
  • 29. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 20, wherein the one or more inlets are positioned to permit balanced flow of fluid through the side wall.
  • 30. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 1, wherein the vessel is a holding vessel for providing a homogeneous slurry.
  • 31. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 30, wherein the base further includes a flange.
  • 32. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 30, wherein the cap further comprises a seal.
  • 33. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 30, wherein the cap is removably secured to both the exterior surface of the vessel and the process pipe.
  • 34. A whirlpool reduction cap positioned in a vessel above an exit port, comprising:a top solid surface greater than or equal to the area of the exit port in the vessel; a base connected to an exterior surface of the vessel; a side wall positioned between the top surface and the base; and an inlet positioned in the side wall; and an outlet positioned below the exit port of the vessel.
  • 35. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 34, wherein the means for securing the base to the exterior surface of the vessel comprises a flange.
  • 36. The whirlpool reduction cap of claim 34, wherein the means for securing the base to the exterior surface of the vessel is removable.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/934,819, filed Sep. 22, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,778.

US Referenced Citations (39)
Number Name Date Kind
118548 Oliver Aug 1871 A
626950 Wheelwright Jun 1899 A
687132 Deming Nov 1901 A
913742 Lewis Mar 1909 A
975380 Berntson Nov 1910 A
1032663 Fay Jul 1912 A
1156946 Vandercook Oct 1915 A
1160848 Conklin Nov 1915 A
1192478 Vandercook Jul 1916 A
1382992 Lombard Jun 1921 A
1580476 Fassio Apr 1926 A
1596893 Schifter Aug 1926 A
1918509 Wilcox Jul 1933 A
1992261 Traudt Feb 1935 A
1996279 Dillon Apr 1935 A
2107390 Rosmait Feb 1938 A
2135261 Rosmait Nov 1938 A
2522300 Richard Sep 1950 A
2528094 Walker Oct 1950 A
2528514 Harvey et al. Nov 1950 A
2582198 Etheridge Jan 1952 A
2590431 Rose Mar 1952 A
2603460 Kalinske Jul 1952 A
2906607 Jamison Sep 1959 A
2997373 Stephens Aug 1961 A
3024914 Robson Mar 1962 A
3871272 Melandri Mar 1975 A
4164541 Platz et al. Aug 1979 A
4394966 Snyder et al. Jul 1983 A
4534655 King et al. Aug 1985 A
4542775 Beck Sep 1985 A
4875781 Raska Oct 1989 A
5609417 Otte Mar 1997 A
5724684 Paar Mar 1998 A
5765945 Palmer Jun 1998 A
5769536 Kotylak Jun 1998 A
5799339 Perry et al. Sep 1998 A
6014987 List et al. Jan 2000 A
6164332 Hatton Dec 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 9503120 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9915265 Apr 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
International Search Report issued Mar. 26, 2002 from International Patent Application PCT/US 01/24953, filed Aug. 9, 2001.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/934819 Sep 1997 US
Child 09/635288 US