The following disclosure relates to detection by a radio frequency (RF) receiver of transmissions within a predefined RF band to identify unused portions of the band for opportunistic secondary transmissions.
Governmental regulations for radio frequency transmissions for a predefined frequency band includer a specification that specify for the band a number of predefined channels. Each channel will have pre-defined bandwidth(s) and a channel center frequency to which RF transmissions within the band must adhere. The channel specification also usually specifies a framework for sharing channels and reusing frequencies.
A frequency division multiplexed (FDM) channelization of a RF band may have narrow equal bandwidth channels throughout the band as well as wider channels whose bandwidth are even multiples of that of the bandwidth of the narrowest channel. Regulations often dictate that wider bandwidth FDM channels share the same center frequencies as the narrowest channel, resulting in spacing for channels whose width is 2n times the bandwidth of the narrow channel to be (2n+1) times the bandwidth of the narrowest channel. Examples of such spectral bands include VHF and UHF spectral bands for private land mobile services, in which multiple channels of different bandwidths will share the same the center frequency.
Mixed-use (voice and data) frequency channels in licensed bands require that a transceiver assess and identify channels available for secondary use. To achieve spectral awareness, a radio may employ various learning methods to sense and detect the primary user activity. Generally, the more knowledge that a radio has regarding the primary user (PU) in a band, the easier it is for it to accurately establish the PU's presence. For example, knowing a PUs' digital signal characteristics such as modulation technique, pilots, spreading codes, preambles, and packet format can be used improve a radio's detection ability. However, detection schemes derived a priori from such knowledge increase complexity and computational demands.
Without a priori knowledge, or when dealing with a mix of voice and data signals, a radio typically must resort to detecting energy in each sub-band to determine whether a primary user is transmitting by comparing a detected energy level of each channel to a threshold that depends on the receiver's perception of levels of thermal noise. If the measured energy exceeds that threshold for any given sub-band, that sub-band is then deemed as occupied and in-use. This type of detection can be effective unless the received signal strength is close to or under the perceived noise floor. For the method to be most effective, a radio needs not only accurately filter and distinguish transmissions that may be present, but also to make accurate assessment of changes to a dynamically changing noise floor.
Disclosed below are representative embodiments of methods and apparatus for sensing use of a radio spectrum band containing variable bandwidth channels.
For a radio frequency (RF) band that is divided into a predetermined number of narrowband channels and that has at least one variable width channel with a bandwidth equal to an integer multiple of the bandwidth each of the narrowband channels, one representative embodiment of an apparatus comprises a radio adapted to decide the occupancy of the at least one variable width channel in the RF band by classifying each the narrowband channels corresponding to the variable width channel and each of a plurality of sub-bands with bandwidths equal to the bandwidths of narrowband channels but with center frequencies shifted by one-half of the bandwidth of the narrowband channel and overlap with the bandwidth of the variable width channel as containing signal or noise based on measured energy levels.
In the following description, like numbers refer to like elements.
The description below assumes that for a given RF band that it has a channel scheme includes a plurality of narrow channels of equal bandwidths with center frequencies spaced at regular intervals, like the example shown in
A digital radio receiver functions or acts like a conventional radio but processes a digitized version of an RF or IF frequency division multiplexed signal for the entire RF band. After being processed by an RF stage, the digital receiver samples this FDM signal to create a discrete, time-invariant signal x(n), where n is an integer value, and has been sampled. Signal processing in a digital radio receiver typically uses a set of independent down-conversion processes that down-convert and filter sampled FDM signal into separate baseband signals, one for each channel, for detection of a transmitted signal using a detection stage.
The processing of sampled FDM signal after the RF stage is typically carried out by elements implemented by programs running on one or more general purpose processors or digital signal processors (DSP), one or more programmed field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), one or more application specific integrated circuits, or a combination of any two or more of them. A system on a chip may also include in some cases an analog RF stage.
Referring now to
Distinguishing the residual energy in the ends of a wideband channel from noise, even when the detected energy from the primary transmitter is low, using multiple pass filtering, allows the occupancy of any wideband channel with a bandwidth that is an integer multiple of a narrower channel's bandwidth and that shares the same center frequency of the narrower bandwidth channel to be determined more reliably for at least two reasons. First, if a secondary user mistakenly uses the spectrum at one end of a wideband channel, there could be interference with reception of the wideband signal by a primary receiver, particularly when the distance between the primary receiver and the secondary user's transmitter is sufficiently relatively small. Second, if the residual energy in the channel ends is mistakenly factored into the noise calculations, it can impact the accuracy of the detection process because the detection threshold depends on an accurate determination of the assumed minimum noise energy level in the channel. To further to address this latter issue, the embodiments of a receiver described herein may, optionally, continuously monitor energy levels across the RF band. Detected white spaces are reevaluated relatively frequently to minimize false and missed detections.
In the example of
Referring back to
The sample FDM signal is then filtered through each of two channelizers. In the first filtering, represented by step 504, the channelizer is configured for separating the FDM signal into sub-bands with center frequencies that coincide with the center frequencies of each of the narrowband channels. In the second filtering, represented by block 506, each of the channelizer is configured for separating the FDM signal into sub-bands center frequencies that offset by half a narrow channel's bandwidth. All of the sub-bands have the same bandwidth as the narrow channels. The first filtering allows for detection of the energy from a wideband transmission in at least the sub-band sharing the same the same center frequency. The second filtering allows for the detection of residual or roll-off energy from the wideband channel transmission in neighboring sub-bands that could be mistaken as noise if only the output of the first filtering process were used.
Examples of channelizers that can be used include the conventional filter bank, such as the one shown in
A final channel occupancy determination combines the sensed energy from both filtering processes. After separation of the channels, the receiver measures or computes an energy level for each sub-band from the first channelization at step 508. The receiver also measures or computes, as indicated by step 510, the energy level in each sub-band from the second channelization. A detector or spectrum sensing process receives or acts on the computed energy levels of each sub-band and, as indicated by step 512, classifies using predetermined detection criteria and the computed energy levels each channel as either noise, which is white space, or signal, meaning that channel is occupied.
This method can be applied to improve detection any wideband channel that has a bandwidth that is a multiple of a narrowband channel and shares the same channel center as one of the narrowband channels.
Referring now to
After an M-channel FDM signal (RF or IF) is sampled by ADC 804 at sampling rate fs in accordance with the bandwidth occupied by the M channels, the samples are immediately down-converted using down-sampler or input commutator 806 (
Each down-sampled signal is then filtered with a different filter in a bank of polyphase bandpass filters. Filter bank 802 comprises an array of M bandpass filters 803a-803n, where M is the number narrowband channels in the FDM signal. However, each filter is a frequency-shifted version of a low-leakage, prototype lowpass filter, with an impulse response Hk(n), where k=0 to M−1. Each of the filters is derived from a prototype filter, such as the baseband filter used in a convention channelizer shown in
Referring again to
A bank of polyphase filters offers several possible advantages relative to a set of individual down-conversion receivers such as those used the channelizer of shown in
The foregoing description is of exemplary and preferred embodiments. The invention, as defined by the appended claims, is not limited to the described embodiments. Alterations and modifications to the disclosed embodiments may be made without departing from the invention. The meaning of the terms used in this specification are, unless expressly stated otherwise, intended to have ordinary and customary meaning and are not intended to be limited to the specific or representative embodiments and structures that are illustrated or described.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application 62/873,830, filed Jul. 12, 2019, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
568101 | Rouse | Sep 1896 | A |
4582280 | Nichols | Apr 1986 | A |
4736371 | Tejima et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5039038 | Nichols | Aug 1991 | A |
5065398 | Takashima | Nov 1991 | A |
5267473 | Bezos | Dec 1993 | A |
5377938 | Bezos | Jan 1995 | A |
5681015 | Kull | Oct 1997 | A |
5720455 | Kull | Feb 1998 | A |
5757291 | Kull | May 1998 | A |
6072993 | Trikha | Jun 2000 | A |
6115435 | Harada | Sep 2000 | A |
6269116 | Javerbring | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6505104 | Collins | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6577610 | Kronz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7042954 | Ha | May 2006 | B2 |
7467032 | Kane | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7742850 | Kane | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8098645 | Yee et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8279796 | Cleveland | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8340056 | Siriwongpairat | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8582694 | Velazquez et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602574 | Alvi | Dec 2013 | B1 |
9037625 | Sturza et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9112735 | Harris | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9379576 | Al Jaeedi | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9398587 | Kong | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9450688 | Murphy | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9669850 | Fuchs | Jun 2017 | B2 |
10160466 | Potter | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10710620 | Potter | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20030103589 | Nohara | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040001561 | Dent | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050149339 | Tanaka | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070170314 | Kane | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070236079 | Kull | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090074101 | Tang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100020235 | Bouillet | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100130124 | Teeter | May 2010 | A1 |
20130136075 | Yu | May 2013 | A1 |
20170088153 | Fernandes | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180019831 | Zhang | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20220006601 | Zhu | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101345726 | Jan 2009 | CN |
2010059312 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fredric J. Harris et al.; “Digital Receivers and Transmitters Using Polyphase Filter Banks for Wireless Communications”; IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 51, No. 4; Apr. 2003; pp. 1395-1412; DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2003.809176. |
AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices Office Architecture and Railroad Electronics Messaging, Class C IMessaging, Standard S-9355.V1.0, Aug. 2014, 4 pages. |
AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices Office Architecture and Railroad Electronics Messaging, Class D Messaging, Standard S-9346.V1.0, 2010, 34 pages. |
AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices Office Architecture and Railroad Electronics Messaging, Edge Message Protocol, Standard S-9354.V2.0, Implemented Oct. 2018, 18 pages. |
Fatih Genc et al., “On the Optimum Ring Ratio Determination for 16-DAPSK Modulation in OFDM Systems”, 2014 IEEE 22nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU 2014), 4 pages. |
Hewavithana et al., “Soft Decisions for DQPSK Demodulation for the Viterbi Decoding of the Convolutional Codes”, ICASSP 2003, 4 pages. |
Meteorcomm LLC, “ITCnet Common Air Interface”, 2013, 46 pages. |
Meteorcomm LLC, “ITCR 1.1 System Architecture Specification”, Doc Revision: 4.0, Doc No. 00002542-A, 2012, 88 pages. |
Progress Rail, “Guardian End-of-Train Device”, progressrail.com, Oct. 14, 2020, 2 pages. |
Siemens, “Rail Automation, End of Train Device, Locomotive Onboard Equipment”, usa.siemens.com/rail-automation, 2015, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210136760 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62873830 | Jul 2019 | US |