Wideband antenna with tapered surfaces

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6778145
  • Patent Number
    6,778,145
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 3, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 17, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An antenna array (10) comprises a plurality of antenna elements (20-32) creating a plurality of radio frequency waves. The central portion (185) of opposed edges of the waves are guided with conductive material. The waves are isolated from each other by non-conductive (cir or dielectric) spaces (189). The waves are guided by tapered surfaces (140, 141) having a predetermined thickness and emitted through a mouth having a mouth length (M). The ratio of the predetermined thickness to the mouth length is increased until there is no substantial increase in the high frequency limit of the array.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to communications antenna arrays, and more particularly relates to such arrays used to communicate data over multi-octave bandwidths.




The current state of the antenna art is unable to provide an array element with the wide scanning and the multi-octave bandwidth needed for some applications. The multi-octave bandwidth typically needed is greater than 4 to 1. The current state of the art includes printed notches such as those described in “FD-TD Analysis of Vivaldi Flared Horn Antennas and Arrays” by E. Thiele,


IEEE Transactions On Antennas And Propagation


, Vol. 42, No. 5, May, 1994. Radio waves are guided by the printed notches. The printed notches have electric insulating material at their center. Thus, the central portion of the radio waves is guided by insulating material. The applicants believe that the exposed insulating material contributes to the deficiencies of such printed notches.




The current state of the art also includes a crossed ridge antenna developed at TRW such as shown in FIG.


1


. In the TRW design, the crossed ridges are arranged in intersecting pairs. The applicants believe that such intersection contributes to problems encountered in some applications.




Both the printed notch and crossed ridge antennas have been found to support resonant modes, which seriously degrade scan performance at one or more frequencies in a multi-octave band. This phenomenon is known as scan blindness. These degradations render the array element unusable in many applications. This invention addresses the problem of scan blindness and provides a solution.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The preferred embodiment includes an antenna array comprising a plurality of antenna elements. The elements cooperate to communicate radio frequency waves. Each element preferably comprises an element structure having a gap arranged to couple radio frequency energy. The element structure defines a gap plane bisecting the gap. A first tapered surface and a second tapered surface extend from the element structure to a mouth and are arranged to couple the radio frequency energy through the mouth. The first and second tapered surfaces define a first section of a first tapered-surface plane perpendicular to the gap plane and bisecting the first and second tapered surfaces. A first mid portion of the first tapered surface and a second mid portion of the second tapered surface intersect the first tapered-surface plane. The first section has a boundary defined at the periphery of the mouth, and the other elements in the array are arranged such that no other tapered-surface plane of another pair of tapered surfaces in the array intersects the first section. A conductive surface covers at least the mid portions of the tapered surfaces.




According to another embodiment, an antenna array is provided with a plurality of antenna elements capable of coupling a plurality of radio frequency waves. In such an environment, the waves preferably are communicated by guiding at least the central portion of opposed edges of the waves with a conductive material and by isolating the waves from each other.




According to another embodiment of the invention, at least a majority of the elements in the antenna array comprise an element structure having a gap arranged to couple radio frequency energy. The element structure defines a gap plane bisecting the gap. A surface having a predetermined thickness parallel to the gap plane extends from the element structure to a mouth defining a mouth length. The surface is arranged to couple the radio frequency energy through the mouth. The ratio of the predetermined thickness to the mouth length is such that there would be no substantial increase in the high frequency limit of the array if the ratio were increased.




According to another embodiment of the invention, at least a majority of the elements in the antenna array comprise an element structure having a gap arranged to couple radio frequency energy. The element structure defines a gap plane bisecting the gap. A surface having a predetermined thickness parallel to the gap plane extends from the element structure to a mouth defining a mouth length. In such an antenna, the antenna elements preferably are tuned by increasing the ratio of the predetermined thickness to the mouth length until there is no substantial increase in the high frequency limit of the array.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates a prior art crossed ridge antenna element.





FIG. 2

is an isometric view of a preferred form of an antenna array and support module embodying the invention.





FIG. 3

is a top plan view of the array shown in

FIG. 2

with the support module removed.





FIG. 4

is an isometric view of an exemplary antenna element from the array shown in

FIG. 3

, including connectors.





FIG. 5

is an isometric view of the antenna element shown in

FIG. 4

take from a different angle.





FIG. 6

is a top plan view of the antenna element shown in

FIG. 5

with the connectors removed.





FIG. 7

is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of three of the antenna elements shown in

FIG. 3

taken along line


180


of

FIG. 3

in the direction of arrows A—A.





FIG. 8

is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of a unit cell element used to explain the construction and operation of the antenna element shown in FIG.


6


.





FIG. 9

is a graph of cutoff wavelength of a TE1 mode for an H-plane scan of the cell element shown in

FIG. 8

where the characteristic impedance of the feed section for the element is 100 ohms.





FIG. 10

is a graph of cutoff wavelengths of higher order modes for an H-plane scan of the cell element shown in

FIG. 8

where the characteristic impedance of the feed section for the element is 300 ohms.





FIG. 11

is a graph of an active impedance match of the element shown in

FIG. 8

under an E-plane scan from 0.29F0 to 0.67F0, where FO is a nominal RF frequency.





FIG. 12

is a graph of active impedance match of the element shown in

FIG. 8

under an E-plane scan for 0.83F0 to 1.50F0.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the preferred embodiment basically comprises an antenna array


10


and a support module


230


. Referring to

FIGS. 3-7

, array


10


includes 49 identical antenna elements, such as elements


20


-


32


shown in FIG.


3


. The elements cooperate to communicate (e.g., transmit or receive) radio frequency waves. The elements are described in a transmit mode of operation. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the elements may operate in a receive mode of operation by reversing the operation described for the transmit mode.




Exemplary element


21


is shown in more detail in

FIGS. 4-7

. Element


21


includes a plastic block


98


molded from Ultem®, manufactured by General Electric, which is covered with a conductive material, such as copper, gold, or the like. Block


98


forms a base


100


, which defines a base top surface


101


. Within base


100


are tuning chambers


102


and


104


ensuring that a radio frequency wave is reflected to the outside of the array.




Lead channels


106


A,


106


B,


108


A and


108


B are formed in base


100


. The channels accommodate coaxial cable with a characteristic impedance of about 50 ohms.




Block


98


also forms an element structure


110


with parallel walls


112


and


113


. The walls define a gap


116


that receives radio frequency energy from the coaxial cable. Structure


110


defines a gap plane


118


that bisects gap


116


as shown. Block


98


also forms an element structure


120


with parallel walls


122


and


123


. The walls define another gap


126


that receives radio frequency energy from the coaxial cable. Structure


120


defines a gap plane


128


that bisects gap


126


as shown.




Block


98


also forms tapered surfaces


140


and


141


arranged as shown. The surfaces are formed from parallel wall pairs


142


,


143


;


144


,


145


;


146


,


147


and


148


,


149


arranged as shown. The parallel wall pairs are joined by coplanar wall pairs


152


,


153


;


154


,


155


;


156


,


157


; and


158


,


159


arranged as shown. The wall pairs terminate in a mouth


162


having a mouth length M. The wall pairs each have a thickness T parallel to gap plane


118


. Wall pairs


152


-


159


have increasing surface area and have an increased dimension perpendicular to plane


118


as they approach mouth


162


. The wall pairs form stepped surfaces that have bilateral symmetry with respect to plane


118


.




As an alternative, the wall pairs could be arranged without bilateral symmetry. For example, wall


149


could have a planar surface extending to gap


116


(FIG.


7


). Walls


144


,


146


and


148


then would be stepped, but would be dimensioned to provide adequate performance when paired with extended planar surface


149


.




Returning to the preferred embodiment, the wall pairs couple and guide a radio frequency energy wave through mouth


162


to the outside of the array. Block


98


also forms top surfaces


174


-


176


arranged as shown. The wall pairs also define a tapered-surface plane


180


that bisects the wall pairs. Plane


180


is perpendicular to plane


118


. Additional planes


182


and


183


parallel to plane


180


define a mid portion


185


of the wall pairs intersecting plane


180


. At least mid portion


185


is covered with a conductive surface, and preferably the entire surface of the wall pairs is covered with a conductive surface, such as copper, gold or the like. Planes


182


and


183


may be moved toward or away from plane


180


in order to narrow or broaden mid portion


185


. Points


186


and


187


lying at opposed ends of mouth


162


indicate the boundary of a section


188


of plane


180


formed by planes parallel to plane


118


and passing through points


186


and


187


.




Tapered surfaces


140


and


141


may have a number of surface configurations. For example, an exponential curve, a smooth taper or a straight line taper can be used for surfaces


140


and


141


, as well as the stepped taper shown in the drawings.




Block


98


also forms tapered surfaces


190


and


191


that are like tapered surfaces


140


and


141


. Surfaces


190


and


191


define a tapered-surface plane


200


that does not intersect section


188


of plane


180


. As shown in

FIG. 3

, no other tapered-surface plane in array


10


intersects section


188


. As shown in

FIGS. 3 and 6

, the spaces (e.g., space


189


) in each block formed by the area above the base top surfaces, such as surface


101


, isolate the radio frequency waves guided by the various pairs of tapered surfaces. As shown in

FIGS. 3 and 6

, the spaces are rotated 90 degrees from the mid sections of the tapered surfaces, such as section


185


, that guide the opposed edges of radio frequency energy or wave through mouth


162


. Thus, at least the central portion of the opposed edges of the waves are guided by conductive material.




Referring to

FIGS. 4 and 5

, antenna element


21


also includes a coaxial connector


220


, such as a GPO™ connector, that couples a radio frequency energy signal to a coaxial cable


222


. Another coaxial connector


224


couples another radio frequency energy signal to a coaxial cable


226


. At the point at which cable


222


exits channel


108


A, the outer shield conductor of the cable are stripped away so that only the center conductor (and maybe the insulation) is placed between surfaces


112


and


113


and in channel


108


B. Cable


226


is arranged in a similar manner with respect to channels


106


A and


106


B.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, module


230


includes a board


232


that supports array


10


. Another board


234


supports the GPO connectors. Posts


236


and


238


mechanically link boards


232


and


234


. A frame


240


is mechanically linked to board


232


through posts


242


-


244


.




The applicants have discovered that scan blindness of array


10


can be minimized or avoided by varying thickness T of the tapered surfaces with respect to mouth length M. Basically, the ratio of thickness T to mouth length M is increased until there is no substantial further increase in the high frequency limit of element


21


or array


10


. This principle will be described in connection with

FIG. 8

that illustrates an idealized unit cell corresponding to the tapered surfaces, such as


140


and


141


.




In the preferred embodiment, width T is constant. However, T could vary along tapered surfaces


140


and


141


(e.g., T could be widest at wall pair


148


,


149


and could become progressively narrower from wall pair


146


,


147


to wall pair


144


,


145


to wall pair


142


,


143


).




The field analysis method for an infinite periodic dual polarized array of ridge elements, such as the element shown in

FIG. 8

, in a square lattice will be described. Such arrays are found to possess very broadband and wide scan properties. With just nominal element spacing to avoid grating lobes, an array was designed to operate over a 5:1 frequency band and ±22.5° conical scan with an active VSWR≦2.




The singly polarized ridge parallel plate waveguide array was found to be broad band and capable of wide scan. Its field analysis and predicted E-plane scan performance is given in K. K. Chan and M. Rosowski: “Field Analysis of a Ridged Parallel Plate Waveguide Array”,


Proc.


2000


IEEE International Conf. On Phased Array Systems and Technology


, Dana Point, May 2000, pp. 445-448. The array can be made dual polarized by arranging the ridge elements in a square lattice as shown in

FIG. 2. A

longitudinal section through a unit cell containing a network of multiple sections of the ridge element is given in FIG.


7


. It provides a match from the 50 Ω feed section to the aperture radiating into free space. The preferred embodiment also can utilize feed sections having an impedance between 10 Ω and 377 Ω. The field analysis method involves finding the TE and TM modes of a given cross section of the ridge element. Mode matching is used to characterize the step junction between ridge sections and between the ridge element and free space with generalized scattering matrices (GSM). Floquet modes are used to represent the field in the free space section of the unit cell. The GSMs of the various junctions and the in-between uniform line sections are combined to yield the overall S-parameters of the ridge element in an array environment.




The cross section of a ridge element section in a unit cell is depicted in FIG.


8


. The ridge element of

FIG. 8

is very similar to the tapered surface portion of element


21


(FIGS.


4


-


7


). The element of

FIG. 8

can be conveniently divided into N rectangular regions. The sidewalls of the unit cell are also phase shift walls. For TE modes, the scalar potential function for the first and last regions (i=1 & N), which have phase shift walls for the top and bottom walls, is










ψ
i

=





i
=
0

,
1
,



M
i

-
1










exp


(


-
j







k
xhl



y

)




[



-

a
hl
i




exp


(


-
j







k
xhl



x

)



+


b
hl
i



exp


(


+
j







k
xhl



x

)




]




exp


(


-
j







k
zh


z

)












k
yhl
i

=


k





sin





θ





sin





φ

±

2

π


l

d
l





,




(

k
yhl
i

)

2

+


(

k
xhl
i

)

2

+


(

k
zh

)

2


=


(
k
)

2


,

k
=


2

π

λ















L terms are used to approximate the field in these end regions. The scalar potential function for the remaining regions (i=2, N−1), which have perfect electric conducting top and bottom walls, is written as










ψ
i

=





i
=
0

,
1
,



M
i

-
1






cos


[


m






π


(

y
-

h
i


)




d
i


]




[



a
hm
i



exp


(


+
j







k
xhm



x

)



-


b
hm
i



exp


(


-
j







k
xhm



x

)




]




exp


(


-
j







k
zh


z

)













(


m





π


d
i


)

2

+


(

k
xhm
i

)

2

+


(

k
zh

)

2


=


(
k
)

2














M


i


terms are used to approximate the field in region I and are proportional to the y-dimension d


i


. (θ, φ) is the direction of scan. The coefficient a


i


and b


i


are used to set up an S-matrix of the junction between regions in the transverse X-direction. The generalized S-matrices of the N−1 step junctions and the uniform regions are combined to yield the cross section S-matrix [S


x


]. Let the phase shift of the right hand sidewall with respect to the left hand sidewall be exp(+jδ). Applying the phase boundary condition leads to the following homogeneous equation where I is a unit matrix and a


L


and a


R


are the coefficients on the left and right phase walls.








[




S
11
x





S
12
x

-





-
j






δ



I








S
21
x

-





+
j






δ



I





S
22
x




]



[




a
L






a
R




]


=

[



0




0



]











Setting the determinant to zero yields the required characteristic mode equation whose roots are the mode cutoff wave numbers. Similar equations are used to find the TM modes.




The fundamental mode is the quasi-TEM mode, which is the lowest propagating TE mode, and is labeled the TE


1


mode here. The line impedance normalized to that of free space may be plotted as a function of ridge gap spacing ratio, d


3


/d


1


, with half ridge width ratio, s


3


/d


1


, as a parameter and d


1


is the cell size. Once the line impedance is specified, these useful curves provide the cross section dimensions since











s
1

=


d
3

2


,






s
2

=



d
1

2

-

s
3

-

s
1



,





d
2

=


d
1

-

2


s
3











h
2

=



d
1

-

d
2


2


,





h
3

=


h
2

+



d
2

-

d
3


2




















When the array is scanned in the H-plane, the TE


1


mode has a cutoff wavelength λ


c


, which sets the low frequency limit. However it is relatively long as seen in

FIG. 9

where the variation of λ


c


/d


1


for a 100 Ω line with inter-element phase shift is plotted. The high frequency limit equals c/λ


c


where λ


c


is cut-off for higher order modes. The normalized cutoff wavelength, λ


c


/d


1


, as a function of inter-element phase shift is shown in

FIG. 10

for H-plane scan. The line impedance in

FIG. 10

is 300 Ω. A close examination of the behavior of the higher order modes leads to the following observations.




The high frequency limit increases as the width of the ridge increases.




There is an optimum value in the ridge width beyond which there is no further increase in the high frequency limit (i.e., the bandwidth).




The high frequency limit increases as the cell size decreases.




The high frequency limit increases as the line impedance decreases.




Arrays with elements having thin ridges need close cell spacing to maintain broadband operation. Reducing the element population density significantly by using thick ridges is the preferred approach. The common practice of flaring the element aperture out to the cell size dimension may not be a good design procedure. Depending on the cell size, higher order modes may be generated and propagated within the element, thus deteriorating the scan element pattern.




Using a cell spacing of 0.458λ


0


, an array was designed to operate from 0.3F


0


to 1.5F


0


with a conical scan of ±22.5°. This relatively large element spacing is needed to facilitate the connection to the T/R modules. To avoid spikes in the element match, no higher order modes are allowed to propagate in any of the ridge sections. The active match of the ridge element under H- and E-plane scan is plotted in

FIGS. 11 and 12

for various frequencies across the operating band. As can be seen, a scan VSWR≦2 is maintained over the band. Even broader band and/or wider scan can be realized by reducing the cell size.




While the invention has been described with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will understand that changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular step, structure, or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. An antenna array comprising a plurality of antenna elements cooperating to communicate radio frequency waves, each element comprising:an element structure having a gap arranged to couple radio frequency energy, the element structure defining a gap plane bisecting the gap; a first tapered surface and a second tapered surface extending from the element structure to a mouth and arranged to couple the radio frequency energy through the mouth, said first and second tapered surfaces defining a first section of a first tapered-surface plane perpendicular to the gap plane and bisecting the first and second tapered surfaces, a first mid portion of the first tapered surface and a second mid portion of the second tapered surface, the first and second mid portions intersecting the first tapered-surface plane, and an outer boundary of the first section at the periphery of the mouth, the other elements in the array being arranged such that no other tapered-surface plane of another pair of tapered surfaces in the array intersects the first section; and a conductive surface arranged to cover at least the first and second mid portions.
  • 2. An array as claimed in claim 1, wherein the element structure comprises parallel element structure walls defining said gap.
  • 3. An array as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first and second tapered surfaces comprise pairs of parallel walls on opposite sides of said gap plane.
  • 4. An array as claimed in claim 3, wherein the parallel walls comprise stepped surfaces intersecting said first tapered-surface plane and parallel to said gap plane.
  • 5. An array as claimed in claim 4, wherein the step surfaces are perpendicular to the first tapered-surface plane.
  • 6. An array as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first and second tapered surfaces have bilateral symmetry with respect to the gap plane.
  • 7. In an antenna array comprising a plurality of antenna elements cooperating to communicate a plurality of radio frequency waves, a method of generating the waves comprising:guiding at least the central portion of opposed edges of the waves with a conductive material; and isolating the waves from each other, wherein the guiding comprises guiding in stepped increments.
  • 8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the isolating comprises providing structure defining open spaces at the edges of the waves rotated 90 degrees from the opposed edges guided by the conductive material.
  • 9. An antenna array comprising a plurality of antenna elements cooperating to communicate radio frequency waves, at least a majority of the elements comprising:an element structure having a gap arranged to couple radio frequency energy, the element structure defining a gap plane bisecting the gap; a surface having a predetermined thickness parallel to the gap plane, said surface extending from the element structure to a mouth defining a mouth length, the surface being arranged to couple the radio frequency energy through the mouth, the ratio of the predetermined thickness to the mouth length being such that there would be no substantial decrease in the high frequency limit of the array if the ratio were increased, wherein the surface comprises a pair of stepped surfaces.
  • 10. An array as claimed in claim 9, wherein at least a portion of the surface comprises conductive material.
  • 11. In an antenna array comprising a plurality of antenna elements cooperating to communicate radio frequency waves, at least a majority of the elements comprising an element structure having a gap arranged to couple radio frequency energy, the element structure defining a gap plane bisecting the gap, and further comprising a surface having a predetermined thickness parallel to the gap plane, said surface extending from the element structure to a mouth defining a mouth length, the surface being arranged to couple the radio frequency energy through the mouth, a method of tuning the antenna elements by increasing the ratio of the predetermined thickness to the mouth length until there is no substantial decrease in the high frequency limit of the array,wherein the surface comprises stepped surfaces.
  • 12. An array as claimed in claim 11, wherein at least a portion of the surface comprises a conductive material.
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
6356240 Taylor Mar 2002 B1
6552691 Mohuchy et al. Apr 2003 B2
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Chan, K.K, et al., “Field Analysis of a Ridged Parallel Plate Waveguide Array,” Proceedings of 2000 IEEE International Conference on Phased Arrays, May 21-25, 2000, pp. 445-448.
Chan, K.K. et al., “Field Analysis of A Ultra Broadband Wide Scan Dual Polarized Array of Ridge Elements,” [complete reference unavailable].
Cooley, Michael E. et al., “Radiation and Scattering Analysis of Infinite Arrays of Endfire Slot Antennas with a Ground Plane,” 1991 IEEE International Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Nov. 1991, pp. 1615-1625.
Holzmann, Eric L., “A Wideband TEM Horn Radiator with a Novel Microstrip Feed,” Proceedings of 2000 IEEE International Conference on Phased Arrays, May 21-25, 2000, pp. 441-443.
Janaswamy, Ramakrishna, et al., “Analysis of the Tapered Slot Antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-35, No. 9, Sep. 1987, pp. 1058-1065.
Schaubert, Daniel H., et al., “Characteristics of Single-Polarized Phased Array of Tapered Slot Antennas,” IEEE, Jun. 1996, pp. 102-106.
Schaubert, Daniel H., “A Class of E-Plane Scan Blindnesses in Single-Polarized Arrays of Tapered-Slot Antennas with a Ground Plane,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 44, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 954-959.
Shin, Joon, et al., “A Parameter Study of Stripline-Fed Vivaldi Notch-Antenna Arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 47, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 879-886.
Thiele, Eric, et al., “FD-TD Analysis of Vivaldi Flared Horn Antennas and Arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 42, No. 5, May 1994, pp. 633-641.
Schaubert, D.H., et al., “Measurement of Phased Array Performance At Arbitrary Scan Angles,” 1994 Allenton Symposium, p. 43 [incomplete copy of article and complete reference unavailable].
Shin, J., et al., “Toward A Better Understanding of Wideband Vivaldi Notch Antenna Arrays,” 1995 Allerton Symposium, pp. 556 and 579 [incomplete copy of article and complete reference unavailable].