This invention relates generally to optical filters that may be useful for multiplexing and demultiplexing optical signals in wavelength division multiplexed communication networks.
In wavelength division multiplexed optical signals, a plurality of different optical signals, each having a different wavelength, may be multiplexed over the same optical link. At intended destinations, one or more of the wavelength signals may be separated using a demultiplexing technique.
An arrayed waveguide grating, also called a phased arrayed waveguide or phaser, works like a diffraction grating. It may be fabricated as a planar structure including input and output waveguides, input and output slab waveguides, and arrayed waveguides. The length of any arrayed waveguide may differ from adjacent waveguides by a constant ΔL.
The input slab waveguide splits the wavelength channels among the arrayed waveguides. Each portion of the input light traveling through the arrayed waveguide includes all of the wavelengths that have entered the grating. Each wavelength in turn is individually phase shifted. As a result of that phase shift and phase shifts at the input/output slab waveguides, every portion of light at a given wavelength acquires different phase shifts. These portions may interfere at the output slab waveguide, producing a set of maximum light intensities. The direction of each maximum intensity depends on its wavelengths. Thus, each wavelength is directed to an individual output waveguide.
Commercially available arrayed waveguide gratings have Gaussian transmission spectral transfer functions that are easy to manufacture. However, high speed applications usually involve flat or wideband profiles. Currently, such flat spectral shapes may be achieved by introducing a horn taper of various profiles, such as parabolic, exponential, sinc, Y-splitter, and the like, at the free propagation region of the arrayed waveguide grating. However, this approach leads undesirably to higher losses than conventional arrayed waveguide gratings and poses manufacturing challenges since horn tapers are very sensitive to fabrication tolerances.
Thus, there is a need for low loss, wideband or flat top arrayed waveguide gratings.
Referring to
The directional coupler 22 is coupled to the output slab waveguide 14b through the waveguides 18 and 20. In one embodiment, the directional coupler 22 may be approximately a 3-dB coupler. The waveguide array 16, connecting the slab waveguides 14a and 14b, may include a plurality of waveguides. The difference in length of the successive waveguides in the array is ΔL.
The arrayed waveguide grating may be a dual channel spacing device with Gaussian transmission spectral profile. Referring to
The phase difference between the optical beams entering the directional couplers 22 is controlled by choosing appropriate path length difference between the corresponding output waveguides 18 and 20 of the arrayed waveguide grating. As a result, light exits from the intended output waveguide 24 of the directional coupler 22.
For example, in order to get a flat spectral shape, two successive output waveguides 18 and 20 of the arrayed waveguide grating that are input to the couplers 22, have a length difference equal to approximately (2m+1)λc/4neff, where m is an integer, λc is the average center wavelength, and neff is the effective refractive index of the two respective waveguides.
The primary channel spacing 26 between the signals A1 and A2 determines the width of the resulting signal, shown in
The secondary channel spacing 28, between the signal A and the signal B, is determined by the spacing between the waveguide 18a and the waveguide 18b. This secondary channel spacing determines the wavelength separation between the adjacent output channels of the overall integrated multiplexer/demultiplexer device.
Thus, in one embodiment, the first and second waveguides 18, 20 have a primary channel spacing 26 that is about one-quarter the secondary channel spacing between the first and third waveguides 18. In other embodiments, different primary and secondary channel spacings may be desirable, but in a variety of cases, it may be desirable to space the individual waveguides 18, 20 of a pair by a smaller separation than successive waveguides 18 are spaced from one another.
Referring to
The engineering of the spectral shape of an arrayed waveguide grating can be implemented by monolithic or hybrid integration approaches. The arrayed waveguide grating and directional coupler structures may be fabricated on the same chip in the monolithic approach, while they are fabricated separately and later bonded together in the hybrid approach.
Referring to
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5136671 | Dragone | Aug 1992 | A |
5412744 | Dragone | May 1995 | A |
5467418 | Dragone | Nov 1995 | A |
5706377 | Li | Jan 1998 | A |
5841919 | Akiba et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5881199 | Li | Mar 1999 | A |
6144783 | Epworth et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163637 | Zirngibl | Dec 2000 | A |
6188818 | Han et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205273 | Chen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212315 | Doerr | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236781 | Doerr et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266464 | Day et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285810 | Fincato et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289147 | Bulthuis et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6507680 | Nishimura et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6556746 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574396 | Dragone | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597841 | Dingel | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606433 | Oguma et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6728446 | Doerr | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6807372 | Lee et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20010010739 | Takiguchi et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020001433 | Hosoi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015554 | Oguma et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020071155 | Inada et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020159703 | McGreer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191887 | Bidnyk | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030081898 | Tabuchi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103722 | Naruse | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133655 | Dingel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040047560 | Laming et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040151432 | Tabuchi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040213520 | Dragone | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0305086 | Jan 2003 | CN |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050047722 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |