This invention relates to a patch antenna, and in particular to a patch antenna having a relatively wide bandwidth with low cross-polarization.
Microstrip patch antennas have become very popular in recent years in a wide variety of applications. They have a number of advantages including low cost, small size and light weight that make them very suitable, for example, in personal communication systems.
A conventional microstrip patch antenna comprises a patch of a given geometrical shape (eg circular, rectangular, triangular) spaced from a ground plane and separated from the ground plane by a dielectric. Normally the patch is fed by means of a feed probe with a coaxial feed. The feed probe may couple to the patch either directly or indirectly/
One drawback, however, with microstrip patch antennas is that they have a relatively low bandwidth and are not generally suitable for broad bandwidth applications. A number of approaches have been taken over the years to try and increase the bandwidth of microstrip patch antennas. Prior proposals, for example, have included adding a second parasitic patch electromagnetically coupled to the driven patch (R. O. Lee, K. F. Lee, J. Bobinchak Electronics Letters Sep. 24, 1987, Vol. 23 No. 20 pp 1017–1072), tuning out the probe inductance with a capacitive gap which allows the use of a thick substrate (P. S. Hall Electronics Letters May 21, 1987 Vol. 23 No. 11 pp 606–607), and including a U-shaped slot in the patch antenna (K. F. Lee et al IEE Proc. Microw. Antennas Propag., Vol. 144 No. 5 October 1997).
None of these prior art approaches to the problem are ideal however. The use of a parasitic patch overlying the driven patch undesirably increases the thickness of the antenna. The capacitive gap needs to be fabricated with high precision. Introducing a U-shaped slot gives an antenna with high cross-polarisation and cannot be used for circularly polarized radiation.
Another example of the prior art is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,724,443 (Nysen). Nysen describes a patch antenna in which a stripline feed element is coupled electromagnetically to a patch, and in which one end of the strip (which is parallel to the patch) is connected by the inner conductor of a coaxial cable (which is normal to the patch). In this design only the strip is coupled to the patch and the antenna is not wide in its bandwidth.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,593,887 (the contents of which are incorporated by reference) describes a patch antenna that is driven by an L-shaped probe disposed between the patch and the ground plane. The probe has a first portion normal to both the patch and the ground plane, and a second portion parallel to both the patch and the ground plane. The lengths of the two portions are selected so that the inductive reactance of the first portion is cancelled by the capacitive reactance of the second portion. This design is quite effective, however the antenna of U.S. Pat. No. 6,593,887 can achieve a gain of only about 7.5 dBi and the cross-polarisation of the antenna remains quite high at about −15 dB. The concept of using an L-shaped probe is also discussed in K. M. Luk et al, “Broadband microstrip patch antenna,” Electron. Lett., 1998, Vol. 34, pp. 1442–1443.
With prior art approaches cross-polarisation remains an issue. Phase cancellation can be employed to suppress the cross-polarisation and this is described in A. Petosa et al, “Suppression of unwanted probe radiation in wideband probe-fed microstrip patches,” Electron. Lett., Vol. 35, pp. 355–357, 1999 and Levis et al, “Probe radiation cancellation in wideband probe-fed microstrip arrays,” Electron. Lett., Vol. 36, pp. 606–607, 2000. This method can effectively suppress the cross-polarisation. However, the method needs a wideband matching network to feed the two strips 180° out of phase with each other which increases the complexity of the antenna structure.
Chen et al, “Broadband suspended probe-fed antenna with low cross-polarisation levels,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat,. Vol. AP-51, pp. 345–346, Feb. 2003 proposes a suspended probe-fed antenna with an impedance bandwidth of 20% (SWR <2) and a cross-polarisation less than −20 dB across the operating bandwidth. However, this design has the disadvantage of having a very long horizontal strip extending outside of the patch. This strip will make the effective projection area of the patch too large for constructing antenna arrays in real-life applications. In addition the antenna gain is only 5 dBi which is low compared to other patch antenna designs.
Another approach is taken in Chinese patent application 0410042927.8 in which a pair of L-shaped probes are disposed between the patch and the ground plane.
According to the present invention there is provided a patch antenna comprising a patch spaced from a ground plane, the patch being substantially parallel with the ground plane, and a feed probe located between the patch and the ground plane, wherein the feed probe comprises at least two portions parallel to the patch and spaced by different distances from the patch.
In preferred embodiments of the invention the parallel portions of the feed probe are separated by portions of the feed probe that extend normal to the patch. Preferably one such normal portion is formed with a coaxial feed at one end thereof.
In one preferred set of embodiments the feed probe comprises 2n portions that are parallel to the patch, and 2n+1 portions that are normal to the patch (where n is an integer). In this set of embodiments it is preferred that the parallel portions comprise pairs of portions whereby the portions in each pair said portions are of equal length and one portion of a pair is spaced from the patch by the same distance that the other portion of the same pair is spaced from the ground plane.
In general terms it is preferred that a first of said at least two parallel portions is spaced from the patch by a first distance, and a second of the at least two parallel portions is spaced from the ground plane by the first distance. The parallel portions are preferably of equal length, and may be of equal or differing width.
In an alternative set of embodiments there are provided an odd number of parallel portions wherein at least one parallel portion is equispaced from the patch and the ground plane, and wherein all other parallel portions are disposed in pairs of equal length and with one parallel portion of each pair being disposed by a first distance from the ground plane and the other parallel portion of each pair being disposed by the same distance from the ground plane.
The feed probe may be coupled to the patch by a normal portion that extends to and contacts the patch. Alternatively the feed probe may be proximity coupled to the patch by means of a coupling portion that extends parallel to the patch.
The feed probe may take a number of different forms. For example the probe may comprise an integrally formed metal strip. Alternatively the feed probe could be formed by a conductive track formed on a printed circuit board. In this latter embodiment the printed circuit board also serves to space said patch from said ground plane.
Some embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a)–(d) show plan, side and perspective views of a patch antenna according to an embodiment of the invention,
a)–(c) show alternative forms for the meandering strip,
a) and (b) show perspective and side views respectively of an antenna according to a second embodiment of the invention,
a) and (b) show respectively plan and side views of an antenna according to a further embodiment of the invention, and
a) and (b) show respectively plan and side views of an antenna according to a still further embodiment of the invention.
Referring firstly to
As can be seen in particular from
It may be noted that while in this example the strip feed is of uniform width, it may also be possible to form the different portions of the strip feed of differing widths in order to provide further flexibility and greater ability to control the operational parameters of the antenna.
In order to provide two current flows in the strip 180° out of phase, which is advantageous in order to be able to suppress the cross-polarisation radiation contributed by the normal portions 4a, 4c, 4e of the strip feed 4, the spacing of the first and second parallel portions 4b, 4d respectively from the patch 1 and the ground plane 2 (ie g1 and g2), and the lengths of the parallel portions 4b, 4d (ie h2 and h1) should be identical, ie g1=g2 and h1=h2. It is also possible, however, that in some embodiments it may be preferable to form the parallel portions of different lengths from each other, and with differing spacings from the patch and ground plane respectively, since varying these parameters may allow the operational performance of the antenna to be adjusted.
In general terms the strip feed 4 can be located at any position between the patch 1 and the ground plane 2. Preferably, however, it is located symmetrically with respect to the patch 1 and in the embodiment of
Table 1 below gives typical design parameters for a wideband patch antenna conducted in accordance with the embodiment of
The embodiment of
As in the embodiment of
In the embodiments of
In all the preceding embodiments the parallel portions of the strip feed are arranged so that they are alternately closer to the patch or closer to the ground plane.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4724443 | Nysen | Feb 1988 | A |
6342856 | Nakano et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6593887 | Luk et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6680705 | Tan et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20040145524 | Bae | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050116867 | Park et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060097921 A1 | May 2006 | US |