Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention relates generally to the field of rope or cable tensioning devices and more specifically to a winch assembly for use with synthetic or organic ropes.
Winch drums are widely used for tensioning and storing wire ropes. They are simple, robust and, if properly designed, long-lasting. They are not, however, compatible with synthetic ropes which can be crushed by the compressive forces that accumulate as rope is spooled onto the winch drum under tension.
Steel used for wire ropes is nearly isotropic and resists crushing well. It has a high tensile strength and stiffness along with good wear resistance. Modern synthetic ropes, made from materials such as Kevlar™ and Vectran™, have even higher strength and stiffness in the longitudinal direction with much lower weight and vastly superior corrosion resistance. (Kevlar is a trade mark of DuPont de Nemours Co. Vectran is a trade mark of Hoechst Celanese Corp.) For applications where weight, strength, stiffness, corrosion resistance or rope flexibility are important synthetic ropes are preferred. Examples are elevators, hoists, cranes, tensioners in deep-sea rigs and lines used in Underway Replenishment at sea. Unfortunately these synthetics are highly anisotropic and can be easily damaged by stresses oriented orthogonal to the fiber direction. They are also subject to rapid wear and fibrilation due to stresses that arise when fibers move within the rope. For these reasons it is important to carefully manage stress within a synthetic rope in any application.
Elevators have successfully used synthetic ropes for considerable time. This application is, however, distinct from winches since there is no spooling of rope—crushing loads are therefore of no concern. Rope wear and the application of large traction forces to the rope are, however, concerns that are shared with winch systems.
De Angelis et al (U.S. Pat. No. 5,566,786-1996) is one of many patents that describes a synthetic rope for use with elevators or lifts. Typical of these patents, De Angelis makes claims for structures that are “for the protection of the fibers . . . ”. Subsequent patents by De Angelis (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,318,504 and 6,397,574) teach the use of “an elastic intersheath between the layers of strands . . . to assist in transmitting torque within the rope over a large area.” The need for shear transfer from the outer surface to the interior of the rope has been recognized but the inventor fails to appreciate that this problem can be better accomplished by using a large contact area between the traction sheave and the rope. Increasing the sheave diameter has no effect on the tension that can be applied but reduces the shear stress within the rope.
It is well known that the tension that can be applied to a rope by a traction sheave is expressed by the ratio T1/T2=eμα, where T1 and T2 are the tensions of the rope entering and exiting the sheave, μ is the coefficient of friction and α is the wrap angle of the rope around the sheave in radians. Both friction coefficient and wrap angle have been exploited as a means to increase the load that can be transmitted by a traction sheave.
In O'Donnell et al (U.S. Pat. No. 6,164,053) “the material for the jacket and sheave liner are selected to optimize the coefficient of friction between the hoist rope and traction sheave.” Other inventors have claimed high-friction coatings or surface roughening to achieve the same result. In Heikkinen (U.S. Pat. No. 5,076,398) and in other patents the wrap angle is increased to nearly 270° by using one or more idler sheaves that are displaced from a traction sheave by a short distance along their rotational axes. This approach can cause excessive rope wear unless the sheave's groove is modified, which is undesirable as it allows excessive distortion of the rope with consequent internal wear. Ungrooved drums have been proposed by, for example, Salmon (U.S. Pat. No. 5,186,283) to achieve wrap angles in excess of 360° but eliminating the groove greatly increases rope distortion and wear.
In a patent by Köster (U.S. Pat. No. 6,193,017) multiple traction sheaves are used to tension a rope supporting an elevator. The sheaves are arranged such that wrap angles of more than 180° can be achieved. With this design very high tension can be achieved and the counterweight can be eliminated. (Hollowell et al contains similar teaching in U.S. Pat. No. 6,193,016 but these claims were anticipated by Köster).
All of the cited patents seek to increase the amount of tension that can be applied to a rope however none address the crushing that occurs on winch drums. In addition little thought has been given to how the sheaves can be driven when more than one are used to apply traction. In one embodiment Köster teaches that “The traction sheaves . . . may be driven via a common motor, with the use of a suitable transmission gearing . . . ” although it must be noted that this is not the preferred embodiment. Such an arrangement ignores the change in length that occurs with changes in rope tension—with the result that slip is introduced between the rope and the sheaves if these latter are not independently driven. Hollowell et al make a similar statement: the multiple traction sheaves are driven by “one or more prime movers . . . ”
No identified prior art addresses the problem that exists in wrapping a rope, particularly a synthetic rope, onto a drum at high tension. Motors and controllers that would allow tension or rotational velocity to be independently controlled over multiple traction sheaves and a winch drum have not been disclosed. The prior art is insufficient to design a winch system that is compatible with synthetic ropes.
The primary object of the invention is to wrap a rope or cable onto a winch drum at a relatively low tension so that crushing forces on the rope are reduced, thereby eliminating a common failure mode.
Another object of the invention is to apply traction over a large area on the surface of a rope, thereby reducing internal movement and wear.
Another object of the invention is to provide redundancy within the winching system in order to prevent catastrophic failures.
A further object of the invention is to minimize the space required for the various components.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following descriptions, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein, by way of illustration and example, an embodiment of the present invention is disclosed.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, there is disclosed a device that applies tension to a flexible tensile member comprising: a flexible tensile member such as a rope or cable; a winch or take-up reel to which said flexible tensile member is attached; a means to apply torque to said winch or take-up reel; at least one traction sheave and means to apply torque to said at least one traction sheave.
The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments to the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. It is to be understood that in some instances various aspects of the invention may be shown exaggerated or enlarged to facilitate an understanding of the invention.
Detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiment are provided herein. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but rather as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed system, structure or manner.
The take-up drum 12 and at least one of the sheaves 13 and 14 are powered by motors. Referring once again to
Reducing the tension in rope 11 as it is wrapped on take-up drum 12 is the primary benefit of this invention. Synthetic ropes made from Kevlar™, Vectran™ and other materials are particularly vulnerable to crushing as layers of rope are wrapped on drum 12. Each successive layer increases the compressive force acting radially on the drum. Steel ropes can be used with little danger of crushing but this problem has prevented the use of synthetics for winch applications such as hoists, cranes, risers used for deep-sea rigs and high-lines for naval replenishment.
The reduction in tension in rope 11 at drum 12 can be enhanced by using additional driven sheaves or by increasing the friction coefficient μ at the driven sheaves. For example, adding a rubber coating to sheave 14 in this embodiment would increase μ to about 0.80, resulting in a potential increase in tension by a factor of about 23 from the point at which the rope leaves drum 12 to that at which it leaves sheave 14. While this allows very low tensions to be used at the take-up drum 12, which is desirable to prevent rope crushing, particles may become embedded within the coating resulting in abrasion and early failure of synthetic ropes.
A more desirable means of reducing the tension in drum 12 is to provide power to both sheaves 13 and 14. If the same torque is applied to both sheaves 13 and 14 the tension in a Kevlar™ rope 11 as it is wrapped on drum 12 is reduced to about a fifth of the total tension applied by the winch system. Equal torque applied to the driven sheaves has the advantage of providing a uniform shear stress within the rope as it passes around each of the driven sheaves.
Alternatively, but less desirably, sheave 13 can be driven at a higher torque. In the case where μ=0.19 and the wrap angle about both sheaves 13 and 14 is 225°, the torque on sheave 13 can be twice that applied to sheave 14. In this case the tension in the rope as it is wrapped on drum 12 is a seventh of the final tension applied by the winch system. Limiting shear stress is an important consideration in the synthetic rope 11 since it can produce relative motion of internal rope components that can lead to premature wear.
If both sheaves 13 and 14 are powered it is preferred that independent motors are used; although less preferable, it is possible to use one motor to drive both sheaves. This preference is described in relation to a second embodiment, which uses four sheaves, as shown in
The main advantage of the embodiment of
Referring once again to
A further embodiment of the winch system is shown in
In all of the embodiments described above it is preferred that the drum and sheaves have radii at least 15 times that of the rope. This can prevent premature failure of the rope that has been observed when it is bent around small radii. It is not, however, necessary that the drum and sheaves have identical radii. Rather, radii can be chosen to vary the rotational speed of different components if desired.
Other components may be combined with the winch system described above to further improve its performance.
While the invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
982500 | Iliffe | Jan 1911 | A |
3843096 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3874517 | Raven et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3934482 | Byers | Jan 1976 | A |
4005852 | Schmitmeyer et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4251059 | Fougea | Feb 1981 | A |
5076398 | Heikkinen | Dec 1991 | A |
5186283 | Salmon | Feb 1993 | A |
5233139 | Hofmann | Aug 1993 | A |
5370205 | Vanhala | Dec 1994 | A |
5566786 | De Angelis et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6164053 | O'Donnell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193016 | Hollowell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193017 | Köster | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6318504 | De Angelis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6397574 | De Angelis | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6631885 | Halas | Oct 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001340666 | Dec 2001 | JP |