The present invention relates to wind turbine blades, and more particularly to torsionally-flexible swept wind turbine blades and to methods for making the same.
Typically, wind turbines include a rotor having a plurality of rotor blades mounted thereon; a drive train and a generator housed in a nacelle; and a tower. The nacelle and the rotor are typically mounted on top of the tower. In operation, the plurality of blades of the rotor receive energy from the wind and convert the wind energy into a rotational torque that is used to drive the generator, which is rotationally coupled to the rotor through the drive train. Aeroelastic wind turbine blades have been investigated for their potential ability to increase the energy production for a wind turbine by forming blades that passively twist to reduce loads created by flow-field perturbations (turbulence, shear, yaw, etc.), thereby making it possible to design larger rotors for normal operating conditions that will increase the output of the wind turbine.
Known aeroelastic blades include those having at least a backward sweep relative to a reference line extending along the blade length on an outboard section of the blades. The backward sweep enables aerodynamic forces to act at a distance from the local structural axis of the blade, which, in turn, creates a local twisting moment about the structural axis. The twisting moment naturally gives rise to a self-correcting induced twist of the blade toward a lower aerodynamic angle of attack, thus passively averting abnormally high lift forces during off-normal conditions.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The present inventors have recognized that the twisting moment developed in an aeroelastic blade can be detrimental to the wind turbine's operation because large moments applied at the root produce stress on the hydraulic blade pitch control system and may lead to a reduced lifetime of constituent parts. Further, the present inventors have innovatively developed a torsionally-flexible swept wind turbine blade having an improved sweep shape. The blade provides an aeroelastic response to passively induce a self-correcting, inherently stable torsional response, while minimizing the developed local twisting moment at the blade root. Advantageously, reduced loads on the blade enable larger rotors to be manufactured, which may provide greater energy output for the wind turbine. The swept blades described herein also provide a smoother gradient profile for twisting moments along the blade length compared to known swept blades. A smoother gradient profile is more favorable from a structural point-of-view as large gradients in twisting moments are mechanically undesirable.
Referring now to the figures,
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the sweep shape 22 corresponds to a reference line extending along or through the blade body upon which the outer geometry may be established. Referring again to
In one embodiment, for example, the outer geometry may be determined by skewing or offsetting a plurality of airfoil cross-sections, e.g. airfoils 34 (
Without limitation, the reference line 48 of the swept blade 20 may represent an elastic axis, a quarter chord line, a center of mass line, a shear center line, a leading edge line, a trailing edge line, or any other axis that is swept relative to a reference line of a straight blade. As shown in
The sweep shape 50 of the reference line 48 comprises a slope 52 at any point along the reference line 48 and a degree of curvature 54. The slope 52 is defined by a line 56 that is tangent to the sweep shape 50 at any particular point. The curvature 54 refers to a local spatial rate of change in slope; for example, in a first region 58 of the curvature 54, there is an increase in slope from point to point in direction from root 26 to tip 28. As can be seen with reference to
The positive curvature 66 may have a starting point at any point within the inboard region 40 of the blade 20 having a zero slope. In one embodiment, the starting point is within the first 25% of the length 25 of the blade 20. In particular embodiment, the positive curvature 66 has a starting point at the root 26 of the blade 20. In another embodiment, the slope 52 is negative at the root 26 with positive curvature. The slope 52 may become zero at some point and turn positive further outboard, all the while retaining positive sweep curvature.
In the embodiment shown in
Referring again to
In certain embodiments, the curvature 54 of the reference line 48 comprises a continuous curvature (continuous curve) 80 as shown in at least
The parameters of the reference line 48, e.g., the sweep shape 50, slope 52 and a degree of the curvature 54 may be defined by one or more mathematical functions. In one embodiment, the reference line 48 is defined by a single function. In a particular embodiment, the swept wind turbine blade 20 is established according to two or more mathematical functions. For example, as shown in
Advantageously, the reference line 48 comprises a continuous curvature 80 when the transition point between any two distinct functions, each defining a portion of the reference line, have equivalent curvature at the transition point of the two functions. For example, the reference line 48 comprises a continuous curvature 80 when a curvature of a first portion 71 of the reference line 48 terminating at the transition point 51 and represented by a first function and a curvature of a second portion 73 of the reference line 48 terminating at the transition point 51 and represented by a second function are equal. In one embodiment, the reference line 48 further comprises a continuous slope at the transition point 51 such that a slope of the first function is equal to a slope of the second function at the transition point 51 of the first function and the second function.
For the sake of further illustration (and without limitation), there are provided three exemplary sweep shape methods for comparison herein. As shown in
As discussed above, the sweep shape 50 for the reference line 48 of the blade 20 (and thus typically the corresponding sweep shape 22 of the blade 20) may be defined by one or more mathematical functions, such as a polynomial function. In one embodiment, the polynomial function is a piecewise polynomial function comprising two or more polynomial functions. Referring again to
For each of the functions representing the sweep shape 50 of references lines 48a, 48b, and 48c, the following boundary conditions exist.
In addition, the function for the reference line 48a (the “+Slope @ 0” method) further includes the following definitions:
The “+Slope @ 0” method uses two quadratic functions to describe its sweep shape and allows the freedom for the sweep shape to have a positive slope at the origin.
In addition, the functions for the reference line 48b (the “0 Slope @ 0” method) further include the definitions below:
The “0 Slope @ 0” method uses one cubic function and one quadratic function to describe the sweep shape and allows the freedom for the sweep shape to have a zero slope at the origin.
Further, the functions for the reference line 48c (the “0 Slope @ 0 CC” (continuous curvature) method further include the definitions below. The “0 Slope @ 0 CC” method also uses two cubic functions to describe the sweep shape and allows the freedom for the sweep shape to have a zero slope at the origin, as well as include a continuous curvature.
Critically, the continuous curvature 80 provides a reference line having two points at either side of the point (α,β) where the functions are equivalent in slope, function, and curvature. In this way, a blade 22 constructed so as to have an outer geometry with a continuous curvature 80 as with reference line 48c provides a smoother gradient profile for twisting moments near the root 26 of the blade 22 relative to known swept blades by gradually tending towards zero moment toward the root 26.
It is contemplated that any parameterization of a sweep shape may be utilized that includes the above definitions. Though
Referring now to
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5584661 | Brooks | Dec 1996 | A |
6899523 | Wobben | May 2005 | B2 |
7118338 | Moroz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7153090 | DeLeonardo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7344360 | Wetzel | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7476086 | Wadia et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7540716 | Wobben | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7690895 | Moroz | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7802968 | Jacobsen | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7832985 | Rochholz | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7914259 | Godsk | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946826 | Koegler et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7997875 | Nanukuttan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20060067828 | Hong et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090220340 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090297355 | Herr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324416 | Bonnet | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100143138 | Marvin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100296940 | Zuteck | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110042524 | Hemmelgarn et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052404 | Zuteck | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110052407 | Zuteck | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110052408 | Zuteck | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110142677 | Nanukuttan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110211966 | Watts et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1755103 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101520027 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101619708 | Jan 2010 | CN |
19738278 | Mar 1999 | DE |
10300284 | Jul 2004 | DE |
102006034828 | Jul 2006 | DE |
2096300 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2141355 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2169217 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2761170 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2012164045 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ashwill, et al., Sweep Twist Adaptive Blade, Presented at EWEC-07, Milan, Italy, May 7, 2007, Sandia National Laboratories. |
Verelst et al., Load Consequences When Sweeping Blades—A Case Study of a 5 MW Pitch Controlled Wind Turbine, Riso-R-1724(EN), Aug. 2010. |
Achatz R: “Innovations in Partnership”; Siemens Innovation Day 2011. |
Geränderte Figur 4 zur US 2006/0067828 A1. |
NACA Research Memorandum: “A wind-tunnel investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a full-scale sweptback propeller and two related straight propellers”; Langley Aeronautical Laboratory Langley Field, VA.; National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics; Washington / Jan. 1, 1951. |
Ashwill T. D. et al.: “Development of the Sweep-Twist Adaptive Rotor (STAR) Blad”; 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, Jan. 4, 2010; pp. 1-13. |
Larwood S. M. : “Dynamic Analysis Tool Development for Advanced Geometry Wind Turbine Blades”; Dissertation in Mechanical and Aeronatical Engineering, University of California, 2009; pp. 1-148. |
Hansen M. H: “Aeroelastic properties of backward swept blades” 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, Jan. 4, 2011; pp. 1-19 / Apr. 1, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130189116 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |