The present technology is directed generally to wind turbine blades with layered, multi-component spars, and associated systems and methods.
As fossil fuels become scarcer and more expensive to extract and process, energy producers and users are becoming increasingly interested in other forms of energy. One such energy form that has recently seen a resurgence is wind energy. Wind energy is typically harvested by placing a multitude of wind turbines in geographical areas that tend to experience steady, moderate winds. Modern wind turbines typically include an electric generator connected to one or more wind-driven turbine blades, which rotate about a vertical axis or a horizontal axis.
In general, larger (e.g., longer) wind turbine blades produce energy more efficiently than do short blades. Accordingly, there is a desire in the wind turbine blade industry to make blades as long as possible. However, long blades create several challenges. For example, long blades are heavy and therefore have a significant amount of inertia, which can reduce the efficiency with which the blades produce energy, particularly at low wind conditions. In addition, long blades are difficult to manufacture and in many cases are also difficult to transport. Accordingly, a need remains for large, efficient, lightweight wind turbine blades, and suitable methods for transporting and assembling such blades.
The present disclosure is directed generally to efficient wind turbine blades, including segmented wind turbine blades connected with joined, multi-component spars and associated systems and methods of manufacture, assembly, and use. Several details describing structures and/or processes that are well-known and often associated with wind turbine blades are not set forth in the following description to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the various embodiments of the disclosure. Moreover, although the following disclosure sets forth several representative embodiments, several other embodiments can have different configurations and/or different components than those described in this section. In particular, other embodiments may have additional elements and/or may lack one or more of the elements described below with reference to
In other embodiments, joints generally similar to those shown in
For purposes of illustration, the spar elements are shown as including planks, and in particular embodiments, the planks are manufactured as pultrusions. In other embodiments, the planks (and/or other suitable structures) can include an infusion or a pre-preg construction. In further particular embodiments, such a plank or other structure can be formed as a unitary piece instead of as a bonded stack of pieces.
The first planks 121a and the second planks 121b can have different compositions that are selected in a manner that increases the efficiency and/or reduces the weight of the resulting blade. For example, the first planks 121a can be selected from a relatively inexpensive material (e.g., fiberglass) that has sufficient strength to carry the bending loads typical of locations close to the blade root. The more outboard second planks 121b can be formed from a lighter, higher performance material that may be more expensive than the material included in the first planks 121a, but has a lighter weight. Accordingly, the resulting blade has less mass further away from the hub. This in turn reduces gravity loading, which can be a driver for hub design. The result is that the inboard portion of the blade, the hub, and the rest of the turbine can be designed to withstand lower loads.
In particular embodiments, if the second planks 121b are made of higher performance materials than the first planks 121a, it is advantageous to reduce the thickness of the second planks 121b, which can result In a lighter structure while still maintaining adequate strength and stiffness, in order to reduce the weight and cost of the blade. In particular, the second planks 121b can be formed from a material having a higher elastic modulus E or a higher strength S than that of the material forming the first plank 121a. This allows the designer to reduce the thickness of the second planks 121b while maintaining sufficient overall strength and stiffness. However, the thinner second planks 121b can be difficult to integrate with the thicker first planks 122a when joining the two spar elements 120a, 120b. Further details of arrangements for addressing this issue are described below with reference to
In a particular embodiment, the layers (the first and/or second layers 125a, 125b) of the second plank 121b are selected so that a product of the combined or overall thickness T2 and the combined or overall second modulus of elasticity, E2, is approximately the same as the product of the thickness T1 and the first modulus E1 of the first plank 121a. In cases for which T1=T2, the combined or overall second modulus E2 of the materials forming the second planks 121b is equal to the first modulus E1 of material forming the first plank 121a. This arrangement is expected to more uniformly transfer loads between the first and second planks, and/or to reduce the likelihood for delamination or other failures at the joint between the two planks 121a, 121b.
In a typical installation, the modulus E of the second layer 125b is larger than that of the third layer 125c, although its thickness is less. To keep the product of thickness×modulus approximately the same for both planks 121, the relative thicknesses T2a and T2b can be adjusted to find an improved (e.g., optimum) solution that offers a good combination of strength, stiffness, and manufacturability. In this case the function of the first layer 125a of the second plank 121b can be to provide additional thickness (e.g., so that T1 is approximately equal to T2) without adding too much to the combined elastic modulus of the combined layers. In a representative embodiment, the first layer 125a includes biaxial fiberglass, and the second layer 125b includes a carbon fiber composite. In a further aspect of this embodiment, the first layer 125a can have a thickness of about 4 mm, the second layer 125b can have a thickness of about 1.8 mm, and the adhesive 126 can have a thick of about 0.76 mm, producing a combined overall thick T2 of 6.6 mm. In still a further particular aspect of this embodiment, the third layer 125c of the first plank 121a can have a composition (e.g., unidirectional fiberglass) with an elastic modulus E1 that is between the elastic moduli of the first layer 125a and the second layer 125b of the second plank 121b.
In
Referring now to
One feature of the foregoing arrangement is that the product of thickness and overall elastic modulus E of the first plank 121a can be at least approximately the same as the product of thickness and overall elastic modulus E of the second plank 121b, despite the difference in compositions of the two planks. In particular, the first layer 125a can operate as a “filler” for the second plank 121b so that the second plank 121b and the first plank 121a have approximately equal thicknesses. As used herein, the term “approximately” refers to thickness variations sufficiently small that they do not result in significant manufacturing problems or structural strength reduction due to the differences in thickness. In particular embodiments, representative thickness variations are with ±1 mm, or within ±10%, ±5%, ±2%, ±1%, or ±0.5% of the base thickness.
An advantage of the foregoing feature is that it can facilitate using high strength, low weight materials in particular portions of the wind turbine blade where the advantages of such materials outweigh the costs, without compromising or significantly compromising the strengths of the components that are joined in such a construction at the interfaces between such composites. This arrangement in turn can reduce or eliminate the likelihood that the blade will strike the tower on which it is carried, or undergo other unacceptable excursions under load, while maintaining a competitive blade cost.
While the equal thicknesses described above are desirable at the joint 119, at locations outboard from the joint 119, the thickness of the second plank 121b can be reduced by thinning or eliminating the first layer 125a, leaving the second layer 125b to carry the structural loads.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the present technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the technology. For example, several of the multi-constituent planks described above were described in the context of spar caps. In other embodiments, the same or similar techniques can be used to form other structures, e.g., other longitudinally extending structures, in a wind turbine blade. Certain aspects of the technology described in the context of particular embodiments may be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. For example, not all the spar caps of a particular wind turbine blade need include the foregoing arrangement of multi-constituent planks. Individual planks may be tapered in the manner described above with reference to
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5375324 | Wallace et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
6237873 | Amaoka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6561459 | Amaoka et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6735916 | Peshkam et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7163378 | Kildegaard | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179059 | Sorensen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198471 | Gunneskov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7322798 | Cairo | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351040 | Livingston et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357726 | Thorning | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7427189 | Eyb et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7438533 | Eyb et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494324 | Hibbard | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503752 | Gunneskov et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521105 | Bech | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7654799 | Eyb | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7726962 | Aramburu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7729100 | Llorente Gonzalez et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7731882 | Bech et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740453 | Zirin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758313 | Eyb | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7811063 | Bonnet | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7883321 | Bertelsen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891947 | Chen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895746 | Bech et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7901188 | Llorente Gonzalez et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7980840 | Burchardt et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988423 | Hancock | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007624 | Stiesdal | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012299 | Hancock | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034278 | Lopez | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043065 | Kyriakides | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8079818 | Burchardt et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105045 | Stewart | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8128854 | Bech et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8171633 | Zirin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191255 | Kristensen et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206531 | Portoles | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221085 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226866 | Arelt | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8500409 | Baker et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8506258 | Baker et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20050180853 | Grabau | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060247901 | Thorning | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070036659 | Hibbard | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070107220 | Bakhuis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070189903 | Eyb | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070251090 | Breugel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080069699 | Bech | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080145615 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181781 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080206062 | Sanz Pascual | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080277053 | Stiesdal | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090035517 | Bech | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090140527 | Pawar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146433 | Althoff et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148300 | Driver et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196756 | Althoff | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208341 | Llorente Gonzalez | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090246033 | Rudling | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090317585 | Bech | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100062238 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068065 | Jensen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071209 | Moller | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100090472 | Berthelsen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100136278 | Cadd et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143145 | Jones | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143147 | Akhtar | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166998 | Bannister et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100226775 | Hartman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100260611 | Rudling | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260612 | Vasudeva et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272570 | Arocena De La Rua et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100304170 | Frederiksen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100314028 | Hedges et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110020131 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031758 | Mitsuoka et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110031759 | Mitsuoka et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037190 | Stiesdal | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044820 | Stenbaek Nielsen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049770 | Stiesdal | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110052403 | Kawasetsu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073237 | Rajasingam | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084496 | Kuroiwa | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091326 | Hancock | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091684 | Holloway | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097211 | Rudling | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103962 | Hayden et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110103964 | Bech | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114252 | Partington et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110135485 | Wang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142663 | Gill | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146896 | Schibsbye | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110171034 | Whiter | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110200444 | Garcia | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110229336 | Richter et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243750 | Gruhn et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120067515 | Dahl et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120211637 | Christiansen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140037455 | Dahl | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140154091 | Baker et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102009040515 | Mar 2011 | DE |
1184566 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1806285 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1878915 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1965074 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2033769 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2264310 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2368699 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2588822 | Apr 1987 | FR |
247784 | Feb 1926 | GB |
WO-03078832 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03078833 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2004050337 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2004078461 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004078462 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2006002621 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2006016089 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006061617 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006082479 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2009059604 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2010065928 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO-2010135737 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2011117546 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2011149990 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Wind Turbine Design;” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind—turbine—design> [accessed: Mar. 9, 2007}; pp. 1-8. |
“Wind Turbine;” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind—turbine> [accessed: Mar. 9, 2007}; pp. 1-11. |
Weber, Friedel; “How a High-Performance Sailplane is Manufactured;” DG-Flugzeugbau.de: Manufacturing a Sailplane, http://dg-flugzeugbau.de/flugzeug-bauene-e.html, accessed Oct. 22, 2008, 10 pages. |
Nettles A., “Basic Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates,” NASA Reference Publication 1351, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama, Oct. 1994, 104 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/DK2014/050053, Applicant: Vestas Wind Systems A/S, mailed May 28, 2014, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140271198 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |