The present disclosure relates in general to wind turbine rotor blades, and more particularly to rotor blades having a low mass, low loads, and low noise design.
Wind power is considered one of the cleanest, most environmentally friendly energy sources presently available, and wind turbines have gained increased attention in this regard. A modern wind turbine typically includes a tower, a generator, a gearbox, a nacelle, and one or more rotor blades. The rotor blades capture kinetic energy of wind using known airfoil principles. The rotor blades transmit the kinetic energy in the form of rotational energy so as to turn a main shaft coupling the rotor blades to a gearbox, or if a gearbox is not used, directly to the generator. More specifically, the rotor blades have a cross-sectional profile of an airfoil such that, during operation, air flows over the blade producing a pressure difference between the sides. Consequently, a lift force, which is directed from a pressure side towards a suction side, acts on the rotor blade. The lift force generates torque on the main shaft, which is geared to the generator for producing electricity. The generator then converts the mechanical energy to electrical energy that may be deployed to a utility grid.
The lift force is generated when the flow from the leading edge to the trailing edge creates a pressure difference between the top and bottom surfaces of the rotor blade. Ideally, the flow is attached to both the top and bottom surfaces from the leading edge to the trailing edge. However, when the angle of attack of the flow exceeds a certain critical angle, the flow does not reach the trailing edge, but leaves the surface at a flow separation line. Beyond this line, the flow direction is generally reversed, i.e., it flows from the trailing edge backward to the separation line. A blade section extracts much less energy from the flow when it separates. Further, flow separation can lead to an increase in blade noise. Flow separation depends on a number of factors, such as incoming air flow characteristics (e.g., Reynolds number, wind speed, in-flow atmospheric turbulence), characteristics of the blade (e.g., airfoil sections, blade chord and thickness, twist distribution, etc.), and operational characteristics (such as pitch angle, rotor speed, etc.).
For some wind turbines, a rise in noise at high wind speeds (often referred to as High Wind Speed Noise (HWSN)) has been observed. HWSN is produced by a thickening pressure-side boundary layer and, ultimately, flow separation at the rotor blade tip. Such phenomena occur if tip angles of attack and/or tip Reynolds numbers are too low. In addition, conventional rotor blades and joints thereof have certain complexities and/or loads associated therewith.
As such, the industry is continuously seeking improved rotor blades having reduced loads, improved performance, and/or increased structural efficiency.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a rotor blade assembly of a wind turbine. The rotor blade assembly includes a rotor blade having an aerodynamic body having an inboard region and an outboard region. The inboard and outboard regions define a pressure side, a suction side, a leading edge, and a trailing edge. The inboard region includes a blade root, whereas the outboard region includes a blade tip, the rotor blade defining a chord and a span. Further, the inboard region includes a transitional region of the rotor blade that comprises a maximum chord. Moreover, a unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span of the rotor blade in the transitional region ranges from about −0.10 to about 0.10 from the maximum chord over about 15% of the span of the rotor blade. In addition, the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span is greater than about −0.03 at an inflection point of the chord in the outboard region.
In an embodiment, the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span of the rotor blade in the transitional region ranges from about −0.06 to about 0.06 from the maximum chord over about 15% of the span of the rotor blade.
In another embodiment, the transitional region comprises from about 15% span to about 30% span of the rotor blade.
In further embodiments, the inboard region includes from about 0% span to about 40% span from the blade root of the rotor blade in a span-wise direction and the outboard region includes from about 40% span to about 100% span from the blade root of the rotor blade.
In additional embodiments, in the inboard region, the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span ranges from about −0.15 to about 0.20. In further embodiments, in the inboard region, the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span ranges from about −0.9 to about 0.125.
In yet another embodiment, wherein a unitless second derivative of the chord with respect to the span is greater than −0.00002 in the inboard region.
In still another embodiment, a peak of the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span is less than about −0.3 between about 30% span to about 80% span from the blade root.
In several embodiments, a peak of the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span is within about 80% span. In yet another embodiment, a peak in a radius of curvature of the chord inboard of the maximum chord of the rotor blade is located within about 11% span.
In an embodiment, the radius of curvature at the maximum chord is greater than about 2 millimeters. In another embodiment, a location of a peak chord radius of curvature is within about 80% span.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method for manufacturing a rotor blade of a wind turbine to mitigate noise during high wind speed conditions. The method includes forming the rotor blade with an aerodynamic body having an inboard region and an outboard region, a span, and a chord, the inboard and outboard regions defining a pressure side, a suction side, a leading edge, and a trailing edge, the inboard region having a blade root and a transitional region that includes a maximum chord, the outboard region having a blade tip. The method also includes forming a unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span in the transitional region ranging from about −0.06 to about 0.06 over about 15% of a span of the rotor blade, wherein the unitless first derivative of the chord with respect to the span is greater than about −0.03 at an inflection point of the chord in the outboard region. It should be understood that the method may include any of the additional features and/or steps described herein.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Generally, the present disclosure is a rotor blade assembly for a wind turbine that is optimized for chord slope (e.g., a unitless first derivative of a chord of the rotor blade with respect to the span), rate of change of the chord slope, and chord radius of curvature for reduced loads, reduced mass, reduced noise, and improved performance. The optimization of the chord slope (e.g., between 30 and 90% of span), particularly of a jointed rotor blade, reduces joint complexity while maintaining aerodynamic performance. In one embodiment, the rotor blade of the present disclosure may also have a larger tip chord to ensure higher Reynolds numbers. At higher Reynolds numbers, the boundary layer is less susceptible to thickening and ultimately separating. radius of curvature for reduced loads, reduced mass, reduced noise, and improved performance. The optimization of the chord slope (e.g., between 30 and 90% of span), particularly of a jointed rotor blade, reduces joint complexity while maintaining aerodynamic performance. In one embodiment, the rotor blade of the present disclosure may also have a larger tip chord to ensure higher Reynolds numbers. At higher Reynolds numbers, the boundary layer is less susceptible to thickening and ultimately separating.
Accordingly, the rotor blade of the present disclosure may have a larger tip chord as compared to conventional rotor blades in order to reduce the effective angles of attack by unloading the tip due to a more favorable induced angle of attack distribution. For example, if a rotor blade were to be designed without concern for loads and noise, an ideal axial induction (AI) (such as about 0.3333) would be targeted, thereby leading to a chord based on the airfoil seed picked for the design. If this airfoil seed were changed, a different ideal chord would be selected. This ideal AI target places that airfoil seed at its ideal design point (i.e., highest lift-drag ration (LID)). If the chord is increased from this ideal value, twist is needed to maintain the ideal AI. Thus, the present disclosure provides a rotor blade that departs from the ideal design so as to achieve a specific goal (e.g., lower loads, lower noise, etc.). Moreover, in an embodiment, the thickness to chord ratio (T/C) of the rotor blade may also be pushed outboard as compared to conventional rotor blades to increase structural efficiency (e.g., a large run of 21% T/C airfoil near the blade tip).
Referring now to the drawings,
Referring now to
Moreover, as shown, the rotor blade 16 defines a pitch axis 40 relative to the rotor hub 18 (
In certain embodiments, the inboard region 24 may include from about 0% to about 50% of the span 44 of the rotor blade 16 from the blade root 36 in the span-wise direction, whereas the outboard region 26 may include from about 50% to about 100% of the span 44 of the rotor blade 16 from the blade root 36. More specifically, in particular embodiments, the inboard region 24 may range from about 0% span to about 40% of the span 44 of the rotor blade 16 from the blade root 36 in the span-wise direction and the outboard region 26 may range from about 40% span to about 100% span 44 from the blade root 36 of the rotor blade 16. As used herein, terms of degree (such as “about,” “substantially,” etc.) are understood to include a +/−10% variation.
Referring still to
Referring now to
More particularly,
For example, as shown in
Further, as shown in
In additional embodiments, as shown in
Referring particularly to
Referring particularly to
Referring now to
Referring particularly to
In further embodiments, as shown in
Referring particularly to
Referring now to
As shown at (102), the method 100 may include forming the rotor blade 16 with an aerodynamic body 22 having the inboard region 24 and the outboard region 26. Further, as mentioned, the inboard and outboard regions 24, 26 define a pressure side 28, a suction side 30, a leading edge 32, and a trailing edge 34. Moreover, the inboard region 24 includes the blade root 36 and the transitional region 25 that includes the maximum chord 48, whereas the outboard region 26 includes the blade tip 38. As shown at (104), the method 100 also includes forming a slope 50 of the change in the chord in the transitional region 25 ranging from about −0.10 to about 0.10 from the maximum chord over about 15% of a span of the rotor blade 16.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2718267 | Woolf et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
4343238 | Koch et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
5474425 | Lawlor | Dec 1995 | A |
6105182 | Elnar | Aug 2000 | A |
6503058 | Selig et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
8061996 | Herr et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8408871 | Herr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419371 | Herr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8678770 | Enevoldsen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8801387 | Fukami | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8956115 | Tobin et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9399919 | Bachmann et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9790795 | Fukami | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10823139 | Hallissy et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20080181775 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090297354 | Herr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100135814 | Bakhuis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110176928 | Jensen | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120020803 | Lees et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120121430 | Olsen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120219423 | Fischer | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130101426 | Saitou et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130177433 | Fritz et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140186175 | Bachmann et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140328693 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140341738 | Bech et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140377076 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150064017 | Bohlen | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150064391 | Trondl | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150316025 | Enevoldsen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160177915 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160327019 | Tobin et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327020 | Tobin et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20190072068 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190301427 | Karikomi | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1152148 | Nov 2001 | EP |
2253839 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2944802 | Nov 2015 | EP |
WO9201156 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO2018046067 | Mar 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
IN First Examination Report for IN application No. 202117010847, dated Sep. 9, 2022 , 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210372364 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16132885 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 17404399 | US |