The invention relates generally to wind turbine rotor blades. The invention also relates to structural preform layers of multiple rigid strength elements or rods for use in fabricating wind blade components.
Technological advances in wind turbines continue to demonstrate that energy from wind power offers a commercially viable alternative energy source. Improvements in design have allowed increases in the sizes of wind turbines and rotor blades such that increases in energy output have been realized. However, manufacturing costs present challenges to the development of wind energy technology as a competitive alternative energy source. In particular, factors that contribute to manufacturing costs and energy efficiencies of wind turbines include the design and construction of rotor blades.
Increases in rotor blade size have demonstrated increases in energy production. Large commercial wind turbines often include rotor blades with spans of 40 to 45 meters or greater. Energy extracted from wind turbines depends on the area of the circle of the rotor blade sweep or rotor diameter from blade tip to blade tip. In particular, increases in blade length increase the area of the circle of the blade sweep that can result in capturing more wind power and increasing energy output. For instance, the area of the circle of the blade sweep is proportional to the square of the blade length, such that, a 10% increase in rotor blade length can result in an increase of 20% in a wind turbine's energy output.
However, scaling up rotor blade size and, in particular, blade length results in a corresponding increase in blade weight and thickness, as well as an increase in the blade's strength requirements. Blade weight is a key limiting factor in blade design whereby an increase in the blade size causes the blade weight to increase faster than the corresponding increase in turbine energy output. In particular, increases in blade length can result in exponential increases in blade weight by a factor of 2.5 to 3 due to increases in blade mass and area. Consequent manufacturing costs would be proportional to the increased amounts of materials consumed in fabricating larger blades and, therefore, can become disproportionally high relative to realized increases in energy output, causing diminishing returns on investments in larger blade sizes. Technological improvements have helped to mitigate increases in blade weight resulting from increases in blade size. However, blade weight remains a limiting factor with respect to improving turbine energy output and efficiency. Thus, increasing turbine energy production through blade size and specifically through blade length presents the challenges of balancing blade length, weight, strength and manufacturing costs to produce blades that cost-effectively increase energy output.
Aerodynamic performance and efficiencies of rotor blades are also critical to efficient and cost-effective wind energy production. Optimum performance of rotor blades is essentially a compromise in blade design between blade shape and blade strength. An ideal blade defines along its span a relatively narrow and twisted shape to enable effective aerodynamic performance, while being relatively thick near or at the blade root to provide the blade with sufficient strength to withstand aerodynamic loads. Blade designs are typically more bulbous near the blade root to provide a thickness and strength that compensates for the relatively narrow and lightweight span of the blade.
Prior art rotor blades include twist bend coupled or twist-coupled blades having a structure that passively affects aerodynamic loads during operation of a wind turbine. Blade design and construction dictate aerodynamic performance and, in particular, the elastic or bending properties that blades exhibit when subjected to aerodynamic loads and pressure. Specifically, such desirable mechanical properties may be built into blade structures through blade shape or curvature and blade fabrication materials. In general terms, a twist-coupled blade bends and twists in response to aerodynamic loads to adjust passively its pitch angle along its length. The pitch angle adjusts the wind load acting on the blade. Passive pitching slightly, e.g., by few or several degrees, towards a feathered position enables the blade to passively distribute and shed wind loads during operation. Blade design and fabrication materials and construction techniques can facilitate the extent of coupling of the blade's bending moment with its twist rotation and thereby the level of passive pitch control the blade may achieve. High levels of coupling blade bending moment and twist demonstrate reductions in aerodynamic loads, particularly under extreme wind conditions, as well as reductions in fatigue loads throughout the rotor or the wind turbine. In addition, twist bend coupling enables blades to adjust constantly and quickly to wind gusts and rotational effects. As a result, increases in energy output and decreases in fatigue damage of the rotor and wind turbine are possible.
Passive pitching results from, in part, the elastic deformation and twist bend coupling in the structural laminates, composites, or other materials constructing the blade and, in particular, constructing the load-bearing structures of the blade. Such materials serve as passive structural components that affect the dynamic response of the blade and aerodynamic loads acting on the blade. Studies of blade designs suggest that overall load reduction can depend on, among other factors, the amount of coupling of structural materials and their design and manufacturing. In addition, structural materials and their design can affect blade cost, stiffness, weight, and strength, as well as blade fatigue and operational life.
Prior art composite fabrication processes often limit the stiffness, strength and fatigue life of structural blade components, such as I-beams, spar caps, and shear webs, to less than ideal or maximum levels. The available forms of reinforcing fibers limit improvements in these processes. For example, glass fiber is commonly supplied as a dry or unfilled fabric, a roving, or a pre-impregnated fabric. In each case the supplied material is wound onto a spool or roll to facilitate handling and shipping. However, winding a layer of fibrous material of finite thickness onto a roll induces fiber waviness or lack of total fiber collimation in the final part, which may not be removable and which has been shown to reduce compressive strength. A reduction in compressive strength must then be compensated with more material, which fabricates an undesirably larger, heavier, and more costly component.
A heavier component may also require more labor. Fabricating such structural components as, for example, a spar cap with fibrous or fiber, e.g., glass, composites, meshes, fabrics, layers, and other materials, often requires relatively large volumes of such materials to build up a structural component. Due to the nature and design of such fibrous and fiber composites, meshes, fabrics, layers, and materials, spar cap manufacturing can be labor-intensive. For instance, fabricating spar caps, such as in a mold, often requires more than 50 glass fabric layers in order to produce a spar cap that may be on the order of 30 to 50 meters or more in length and may have a thickness, at some points along its length, of about 40 mm or more. Clearly, a lower material efficiency requires that a greater quantity of fabric must be used to make a thicker spar cap, and more labor is required to fill the spar cap mold.
In addition, employing such fiber-reinforced fabric layers and composite materials typically requires application of an appropriate resin to bond fabric layers and composite materials and thereby define the finished spar cap geometry. Current methods and techniques of applying bonding resin include resin infusion and resin injection. Such methods and techniques involve infusing under vacuum or injecting under pressure a volume of bonding resin into, for instance, a stack of reinforcing fiber fabric layers and subsequently curing the resin to bond the layers. Because of the lack of structural shape inherent in a fiber fabric, such prior art materials are susceptible to fiber wash during resin infusion or injection that results in undesirable wrinkles, buckling, misplacement, and misorientation of fabric layers and composites in the resulting spar cap.
Further, prior art fiber-reinforced fabric layers and composite materials are susceptible to shrinkage during curing of bonding resin. During resin cure, bonding resin may shrink substantially such that resin shrinkage may cause undesirable wrinkling, kinking, and buckling of fabric layers and composite materials during fabrication of structural components.
Again, the forms of the prior art materials do not support a tightly controlled fabricating or molding process, in turn requiring additional material usage. Consequently, fabrication techniques and processes using fiber-reinforced or fibrous materials can affect the overall manufacturing time and cost of turbine blade production.
Thus, it is desirable to form load bearing and structural components of turbine rotor blades using improved fabrication materials and techniques that accommodate increases in rotor blade size, while decreasing blade weight and increasing blade strength. In addition, it is desirable to employ fabrication materials and techniques to produce such load-bearing structures as spar caps to improve rotor blade aerodynamics and, in cases of swept-shaped rotor blades, to contour such structures to conform to blade curvature or sweep. It is also desirable to use fabrication materials and techniques that help to avoid or to minimize fiber wash and wrinkling, while increasing the fiber volume fraction to ensure sufficient strength in such structural components as spar caps. It is also desirable to use fabrication materials and techniques that increase the overall efficiencies of blade manufacturing.
Further, it is desirable to use fabrication materials and techniques that reduce the manufacturing costs and time associated with producing blade components in terms of reducing materials and labor costs, increasing resin infusion/injection rates, and lowering resin cure times.
In an aspect, a composite beam for a wind turbine blade includes a preform layer, the preform layer including multiple elongate strength rods arranged longitudinally relative to one another in a single layer, each strength rod being disposed adjacent to and spaced from at least one adjacent strength rod. Each strength rod has a rectangular cross section and includes multiple, substantially straight collimated structural fibers fixed in a solidified matrix resin. The preform layer includes at least one carrier layer to which the multiple strength rods are joined by an adhesive. The carrier layer spaces adjacent strength rods a fixed distance apart to facilitate the flow of liquid bonding resin between adjacent strength rods of the preform layer to its joined carrier layer, the carrier layer being of a permeable material suitable to facilitate the flow of liquid bonding resin through the carrier layer.
In another aspect, the composite beam includes an absence of material between each strength rod, the absence of material permitting flow of liquid bonding resin between adjacent strength members. The carrier layer includes at least one of: a nonwoven material and a woven material.
In yet another aspect, the at least one of a nonwoven material and a woven material is selected for its wettability and material compatibility and the adhesive is an adhesive compatible with the liquid bonding resin.
In yet a further aspect, each of the rectangular strength rods include rounded edges. The rounded edges of the strength rods define an edge radius of curvature. The edge radius is less than an upper limit of ¼ quarter of the thickness of the rectangular strength rods.
In a further aspect, the rectangular cross sections of each of the strength rods are substantially the same size.
In an aspect, the preform layer is stacked with one or more preform layers. The stacked preform layers may be stacked in a brick pattern or stacked in a column pattern or stacked in a random pattern.
In a further aspect, the preform layer is stacked with one or more preform layers and the edge radius is greater than ¼ of the spacing between individual preform layers.
In another aspect, the carrier layer of the perform layer includes at least one of a nonwoven material and a woven material having one or more of substantially unidirectional: multiple fibers, multiple yarns and multiple rovings disposed at a substantially transverse orientation relative to the longitudinal axis of the strength rods.
In yet another aspect, the composite beam forms one or more of a spar cap, an I-beam, a shear web and other structural blade components of the wind turbine blade.
In general, in one aspect, the invention provides a spar cap for a wind turbine blade comprising a composite beam configured as a structural support component of a shell of a wind blade airfoil. The composite beam defines dimensions such that the spar cap extends along at least a portion of the span of the blade. The composite beam can include one or more preform layers with each preform layer including multiple rigid unidirectional strength elements or rods arranged adjacent one another and longitudinally relative to their length in a single layer along a longitudinal axis of the preform layer. The strength elements or rods can be retained in the single layer with a retaining structure interfacing with the elements or rods. One configuration of a retaining structure can include one or more fibrous carrier layers to which the strength elements or rods are joined. The single layer arrangement of the strength elements or rods can define the preform layer as a prefabricated structural element or component. Each strength element or rod can comprise a composite material of elongate and substantially straight structural fibers saturated by a matrix resin. The matrix resin can be distributed with a mass of the fibers, which are oriented longitudinally and are aligned substantially linearly. When cured or solidified, the composite material can form a rigid prefabricated element or rod having a substantially uniform distribution of fibers and high degree of fiber collimation. The straightness of the fibers and significant fiber collimation can yield strength elements or rods with high rigidity and significant compression strength. Such properties are highly advantageous and are required where the preform layers are used in load-bearing structures, such as a composite beam of a spar cap, and in blade reinforcements and other blade components. The rigidity and compression strength of the preform layers according to the invention can provide the spar cap and other blade components, and ultimately the turbine blade, with the mechanical properties required for larger and longer blades without increasing significantly blade weight and materials and manufacturing costs.
Each preform layer can be layered or stacked with one or more other preform layers to form blade structures and components. In one configuration, multiple layered or stacked preform layers can define wholly or partially a length and a thickness of a composite beam of the spar cap. Some configurations of the composite beam can be constructed and arranged with multiple preform layers to define the spar cap with a substantially uniform transverse width and thickness. Other configurations of the composite beam can be constructed and arranged with multiple preform layers to define the spar cap with a transverse width tapering, for instance, toward the tip of the blade. Further configurations of the composite beam can be constructed and arranged with multiple preform layers to define the spar cap with a tapered thickness that tapers along the span of the spar cap toward the tip of the blade and, optionally, toward the root of the blade. Still other configurations of the composite beam can be constructed and arranged with multiple preform layers to define the spar cap with a sweep contour. The sweep contour can correspond to the contour of a swept blade design in which the spar cap is incorporated.
Implementations of the spar cap may include one or more of the following features. The configurations of the spar cap composite beam constructed and arranged with multiple preform layers can include one or more preform layers joined or bonded to, or interleaved with, other preform layers and/or multiple fibrous layers to define the composite beam with the required or desired transverse width and thickness. The composite beam can comprise multiple preform layers that define a certain percentage of the total weight per unit area of the composite beam, such that, the preform layers may comprise any percentage of the total weight of a given area of the composite beam. This percentage may depend on the blade design and shape, the requisite mechanical properties and/or the performance requirements of the blade. For those configurations of the composite beam constructed primarily of multiple layered or stacked preform layers, the preform layers can include up to about 100% of the total weight of the composite beam. In other configurations of the composite beam constructed and arranged with multiple preform layers joined or bonded to, or interleaved with, multiple fibrous layers, the preform layers can include a relatively low percentage of the total weight per unit area of the composite beam. The construction and arrangement of the preform layers according to the invention can provide flexibility in this regard, such that, the preform layers can facilitate forming the composite beam with any number of preform layers, alone or in combination with multiple fibrous layers, to satisfy any required or desired percentage of the total weight of the composite beam.
Further the construction and arrangement of the preform layers according to the invention can provide opportunities to increase or maximize the packing density of the preform layers and thereby the strength elements and rods in the composite beam, such that, the preform layers can increase or maximize the fiber volume fraction of the composite beam. The structural fibers of the strength elements or rods can increase the net total fiber volume fraction of the preform layers. In this manner, the preform layers according to the invention can be employed to manipulate the net total fiber volume fraction of the preform layer and the composite beam of the spar cap without compromising the spar cap in terms of weight and overall dimensions.
The multiple fibrous layers to which one or more preform layers are joined to or interleaved with may include layers of fibers, meshes or fabrics constructed of glass fibers, carbon fibers, graphite fibers, basalt fibers or ceramic fibers, and combinations thereof. Where the composite beam is constructed primarily of multiple preform layers, the preform layers can define varying lengths so that, when the preform layers are stacked or layered with one another to fabricate the composite beam, the varying lengths of the preform layers can define a tapered thickness of the composite beam. Where the composite beam is constructed primarily of multiple fibrous layers, each preform layer can define certain overall dimensions so that, when the preform layers are stacked or layered with one another and/or with multiple fibrous layers to form the composite beam, the preform layers can serve as structural reinforcements or strength members of the spar cap and other portions of the blade.
Multiple stacked or layered preform layers joined to or interleaved with multiple fibrous layers or not, can define a stacked formation to which a bonding resin can be applied to ultimately form the composite beam. The bonding resin can be applied to the stacked formation by various techniques including, but not limited to, resin infusion processes, resin transfer molding, other vacuum techniques, and hand lay-up techniques. After the bonding resin cures or solidifies, the composite beam can define the spar cap with a finished structure having well-defined overall dimensions with minimal irregularities.
In another aspect, the invention provides the preform layer as described above. The preform layer can include multiple unidirectional strength elements or rods arranged adjacent one another and longitudinally relative to their length in a single layer. In some configurations of the preform layer according to the invention, the strength elements or rods are also substantially parallel to one another. The preform layer can further include a retaining structure to hold the multiple strength elements or rods in the single layer. The retaining structure in some configurations of the preform layer can include one or more fibrous carrier layers to which the multiple strength elements or rods are joined. The fibrous carrier layer can include a nonwoven fabric constructed of multiple fibers, yarns, and/or rovings. The fibrous carrier layer can have the same length and transverse width as the preform layer. In other configurations, the fibrous carrier layer can have a wider transverse width than the preform layer to define at least one peripheral border or selvedge that extends outwardly from at least one edge of the preform layer. The border or selvedge can define a sufficient transverse width to serve as an attachment point at which the preform layer may be stacked, layered or interleaved with one or more other preform layers, multiple fibrous layers, and/or borders or selvedges of other preform carrier layers. In this manner, the one or more carrier layers with a border and selvedge can permit the preform layer(s) to connect or join to one or more other components of the composite beam of the spar cap. In addition, the one or more carrier layers with a border or selvedge can permit the preform layer(s) to connect or join the composite beam of the spar cap to adjacent components of the blade, such as a web shear or shell portion of the blade airfoil. The one or more carrier layers with a border and selvedge can also permit the preform layer(s) to connect or join to layers or components of the shell portions of a blade airfoil.
In one configuration, the nonwoven fibrous carrier layer, when assembled with one or more preform layers, can include transverse fibers, yarns and/or rovings arranged in a transverse orientation, or at about 90°, relative to the unidirectional strength elements or rods of the preform layer. The fibrous carrier layer can impart strength to the preform layer and can increase the fiber volume fraction of the preform layer. The fibrous carrier layer can also include a stitched nonwoven fabric, including a biaxial or triaxial fabric. The multiple strength elements or rods can be bonded or adhered to one or both surfaces of the fibrous carrier layer. In other configurations of the preform layer according to the invention, the fibrous carrier layer can include a woven fabric.
In another aspect, the invention provides a multi-layered structural or reinforcement component including at least one preform layer joined to or interleaved with multiple fibrous layers. The multi-layered component can include one or more preform layers stacked, joined to or interleaved with multiple fibrous layers to define the layers of the component. The fibrous layers can include fibrous layers, meshes or fabrics constructed of glass, carbon, graphite, basalt, or ceramic fibers, yarns, and/or rovings, and combinations thereof. The composition and the arrangement of the preform layers and fibrous layers to form the multi-layered component can be determined relative to the purpose and the location of the component in a wind turbine blade. For instance, one configuration of the multi-layered component can include multiple fibrous layers disposed between two preform layers with the strength elements or rods of the preform layers defining an outward surface or exoskeleton of the multi-layered component.
In a further aspect, the invention provides multiple preform layers configured in a continuous web. The continuous web can include multiple preform layers attached adjacent one another along their transverse width. The web can include tapered end zones extending transversely along its width to define each preform layer with a certain length. The tapered end zones are disposed and configured in the web to separate individual preform layers from one another. In addition, the tapered end zones can be further configured to permit preform layers to be separated, such as by cutting, from one another and from the web. In this manner, multiple preform layers required to fabricate one or more composite beams, or one or more components of the turbine blade, can be provided in the continuous web form for purposes of storing and shipping and for dispensing multiple preform layers during fabrication of a composite beam or other blade components.
Features and advantages of the aspects of the invention, along with the invention itself, will be more fully understood after a review of the following figures, detailed description, and claims.
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
With further reference to
The blade 20 also includes a longitudinal load bearing structure or spar cap 126 incorporated with one or more of the layers of the shell portions 120 and 122 and extending along at least a portion of the span or length L1 of the blade 20. One or more shear webs 125 extending transversely between the spar caps 126 and the shell portions 120 and 122 join the spar caps 126. The spar caps 126 and the shear webs 125 are reinforcement structures and are constructed and arranged to provide rigidity, strength, and stability to the blade 20. These blade 20 properties help to support the blade weight and help to substantially reduce or eliminate damage to the blade 20 from blade flexure and from aerodynamic loads acting on the blade 20, as well as help to substantially reduce or eliminate the risk of contact of the blade 20 with the turbine tower 14.
Spar Cap Formation and Configurations
Referring to
As shown in
Spar caps, such as those illustrated in
Spar caps may also be fabricated or manufactured in an integrated mold (not shown) configured to form at least portions of the spar cap 126 and the shell portions 120 and 122 of the blade 20. Such molds similarly have configurations and dimensions to help to fabricate the spar cap 126 with the required or desired length L2, transverse width W2 and thickness. Such molds may also permit fabrication materials, such as the preform layers 300A and 300B described below, to be layered or stacked with one another, or to be layered or stacked vertically, within the interior of the mold.
As shown in
The stacked formation 128 of the multiple preform layers 300A and 300B may include preform layers 300A and 300B stacked such that the side edges 301 of each individual preform layer 300A and 300B are aligned longitudinally, as shown in
When assembled, the stacked preform layers 300A and 300B may further help to configure a surface of the composite beam 127 according to the invention as a tapered or stepped surface 127A, which results from the varying lengths L3 and L4a, L4b, L4c, L4d, etc. of the preform layers 300A and 300B. A non-tapered or non-stepped surface 127B may also result from one or more preform layers 300A having longer or the longest length L3 of the multiple preform layers of the spar cap 126. In one configuration of the spar cap 126 according to the invention, the tapered or stepped surface 127A is oriented outwardly toward an outer surface of the blade airfoil 100, while the non-tapered or non-stepped surface 127B is oriented inwardly toward a hollow interior of the blade airfoil 100 defined by an internal configuration of the airfoil 100. Alternatively, in another configuration of the spar cap 126 according to the invention, the tapered or stepped surface 127A is oriented inwardly away from the outer surface of the blade airfoil 100 and toward the hollow interior of the blade airfoil 100.
As described, spar caps may define a tapering thickness Ti1, Ti2, Ti3, Ti4, Tin along their length L2, tapering toward the blade tip 116 and tapering toward the blade root 118 from a point of greatest or maximum thickness Tmax of the spar cap. As shown in
In one example, for illustrative purposes only, where the blade 20 defines a length L1 of forty (40) meters, the spar cap 126 defines a length L2 of about thirty nine (39) meters (with a point of greatest thickness Tmax of about 40 mm disposed at a station of about 3 meters from the blade root 118). The spar cap 126 has a substantially uniform transverse width W2 of about 500 mm, and a gradual rate of taper S1 of the beam's surface 127A may have a ratio of about 1:900. In this configuration, a steep rate of taper S2 may have a ratio of about 1:50. The invention is not limited to any particular rate(s) of taper S1 and S2 or to any particular thickness of the composite beam 127 because these features of the beam are not necessarily constant or limited. The spar cap 126 according to the invention, therefore, may be constructed of any thickness and rate of taper to help to meet the strength and flexibility requirements of a particular spar cap design.
As shown in
Referring to
More specifically, the stacked formation 128 or the composite beam 127 according to the invention includes one or more preform layers 300A and 300B stacked, layered or interleaved with one or more fibrous layers 602. As shown in the side view of the stacked formation 128 or the composite beam 127 of
As shown in
As shown in
The stacked formation 128 and the composite beam 127 may comprise multiple preform layers 300A and 300B that define a certain percentage of the total weight per unit area of the stacked formation 128 or composite beam 127. The invention is not limited in this respect and anticipates that the preform layers 300A and 300B may comprise any percentage of the total weight of a given area of the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127. This percentage may depend on the blade design and shape, the requisite mechanical properties and/or the performance requirements of the blade. Additionally, or alternatively, any of the configurations of the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 shown in
In a further instance, one or more preform layers 300A and 300B may be configured to partially reinforce one or more select areas of the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 constructed primarily of multiple fibrous layers 602, such that, the preform layer(s) 300A and 300B may comprise a low percentage of the total weight of certain select areas. In this configuration the one or more preform layers 300A and 300B may constitute any percentage, and as little as 1% or less, of the total weight of a select area of the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127.
As discussed below in detail with reference to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As mentioned above, the spar cap 126 according to the invention may be constructed as a pre-cast or pre-molded composite beam 127, e.g., employing a spar cap mold. In this case, the composite beam 127 is constructed as a separate component from the blade airfoil 100 and shell portions 120 and 122 and thereafter assembled with each shell portion 120 or 122 during the formation or molding of the shell portions 120 and 122. Alternatively, the spar cap 126 may be constructed during, and as part of, the formation or molding process constructing the shell portions 120 and 122. In each configuration, the preform layers 300A and 300B, or the preform layers 300A and 300B and fibrous layers 602, constructing the composite beam 127 initially define a stacked formation 128 that may be assembled, e.g., within a spar cap mold, as described herein.
As will be described in detail below with reference to
Any of a variety of methods and techniques of applying bonding resin 502 to the stacked formation 128 may be employed including methods and techniques using pressure, heat, or vacuum that infuses or injects bonding resin into the stacked formation 128. Resin infusion techniques may include applying a vacuum to the stacked formation 128 that draws bonding resin 502 into and through the preform layers 300A and 300B and fibrous layers 602. For instance, where the stacked formation 128 is constructed within a mold, a vacuum may be applied along the circumference of the mold. The vacuum draws the resin supply into the mold along the transverse width of the mold, and further draws the resin supply through the stacked formation 128 along its transverse width W2. Such resin infusion methods include, but are not limited to, Seeman Composite Resin Infusion Molding Process (SCRIMP), vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM), other vacuum techniques, and hand lay-up techniques.
Other techniques include resin injection by which the supply of bonding resin 502 is delivered to a closed mold under pressure and is injected into the mold, and thereby into and through the stacked formation 128, to fill any spaces or voids in the stacked formation 128.
After application of the requisite volume of bonding resin 502, the resin-filled stacked formation 128 is subjected to a cure process, such as, for example, a process employing heat at any suitable temperatures for any suitable times sufficient to cure adequately the bonding resin 502 and to bond the preform layers 300A and 300B, individual strength elements or rods, and fibrous layers 602 together. Alternatively, where resin infusion techniques are employed, infusion and curing stages may overlap such that curing of bonding resin 502 begins after infusion has begun, e.g., by applying heat to the mold in which the stacked formation 128 resides and before the entire requisite volume of resin is applied to the stacked formation 128. As those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, other techniques of curing the resin-filled stacked formation 128 are possible including, but not limited to, ambient temperature curing, chemical curing, ultraviolet curing, electron beam curing, and curing by a combination of heat and pressure.
Preform Layers of Multiple Strength Elements or Rods
Referring to
The strength elements or rods 202 and 402 exhibit a desirable or requisite stiffness and strength. Yet, the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 also demonstrate a high degree of flexibility such that individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 and the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 may adjust and conform to bends and curvatures of such structural blade components as spar caps with minimal or no wrinkling and buckling. The elements or rods 202 and 402 may also exhibit such bending properties during the fabrication of structural components, such as spar caps. Where incorporated in a blade 20, such as twist-coupled blade 20, the spar cap 126 may help to permit the blade 20 to bend and to twist along its span in response to wind and fatigue loads acting along the blade 20.
The preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 may be provided as a prefabricated composite including a defined number of strength elements or rods 202 and 402. The strength elements or rods 202 and 402 are disposed in the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 in a single layer. The strength elements or rods 202 and 402 are unidirectional with individual elements or rods 202 and 402 aligned longitudinally relative to the length L5 of other elements or rods 202 and 402 in the layer. As illustrated in
As shown in
As
Referring to
Each strength element or rod 202 and 402 is constructed of a composite material including elongate and substantially straight structural fibers 306 saturated by a matrix resin 308, e.g., a thermoplastic or cured resin. The fibers 306 are oriented longitudinally and are aligned substantially linearly. The matrix resin 308 is distributed within a mass of the fibers 306 to form, when cured or solidified, a rigid prefabricated element or rod 202 and 402. The resulting elements or rods 202 and 402 have a substantially uniform distribution of fibers 306 within the matrix resin 308. The fibers 306 also have a high degree of collimation whereby the fibers 306 are unidirectional and are substantially linear relative to other fibers 306 in the element or rod 202 and 402. The relative straightness of the fibers 202 and 402 and significant fiber collimation yield strength elements or rods 202 and 402 that exhibit high rigidity and significant compression strength, which are required and highly advantageous where the preform layers 300A, 300B are employed to fabricate load-bearing structures, such as the spar cap 126, and structural elements and reinforcements of blade components. The resulting preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 thereby includes prefabricated elements or rods 202 and 402 that impart the required and desirable stiffness and compressive strength to each of the multiple preform layers 300 forming the composite beam 127 or other blade components.
The type of elongate structural fibers 306 is selected with respect to fiber type, fiber diameter, and/or fiber filamentization depending on the properties required for the spar cap 126 and other blade components. The elongate structural fibers 306 generally define diameters in a range of from about 1 micrometer to about 100 micrometers, and include, but are not limited to, glass fibers, carbon fibers, basalt fibers, and combinations thereof.
The matrix resin 308 surrounding the fibers 306 includes a resin matrix suitable for adhering to and fixing the fibers 306 and for providing rigidity and strength to the resulting element or rod 202 and 402, as well as to the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400. The matrix resin 308 may include non-curable resins or heat/radiation cured resins including, but not limited to, a thermoplastic resin or a thermoset resin. The matrix resin 308 may be selected based on the mechanical reinforcement properties the matrix resin 308 provides to the resulting individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 and the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400.
The preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 of prefabricated strength elements or rods 202 and 402 do not shrink during cure of the bonding resin 502 that is applied to the stacked formation 128, as described below with reference to
The resistance to shrinkage and fiber wash that the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention exhibit helps to avoid or at least minimize wrinkling, kinking, and buckling and thereby helps to eliminate or at least minimize any structural weaknesses in the resulting spar cap 126.
The strength elements or rods 202 and 400 may further define surface characteristics and/or surface chemistry that help to promote adhesion of the elements or rods 202 and 402 to the bonding resin 502. Surface characteristics of the elements or rods 202 and 402 include, but are not limited to, a textured surface, a roughened surface, or a chemically treated surface achieved with various techniques, e.g., applying a surface coating, to produce, e.g., roughened, surfaces of the elements or rods 202 and 402. Textured or roughened surfaces promote adhesion of the bonding resin 502 to the elements or rods 202 and 402.
In addition, textured or roughened surfaces of the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 help to facilitate penetration of the bonding resin 502 between strength elements on rods 202 and 402, particularly where the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 are stacked or layered. Textured or roughened surfaces of elements or rods 202 and 402 also help to increase bonding between individual elements or rods 202 and 402 and between preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 such that the inner laminar sheer strength of stacked or layered preform layers 300A, 300B and 400, and the composite beam of the spar cap 126, is increased. Further, textured or roughened surfaces of elements or rods 202 and 402 help inhibit delamination cracks between the bonding resin 502 and the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 thereby increasing the fatigue life of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 and the resulting spar cap 126 or other blade components in which the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 is included.
As shown in
The minute spaces 500 between strength elements or rods 202 and 402 enhance the flexibility of the individual elements or rods 202 and 402 and facilitate the ability of the elements or rods to bend, particularly where the elements or rods 202 and 402 are formed in the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 or are incorporated in the composite beam 127 of the spar cap 126 or other blade components. During formation, e.g., molding, of the composite beam 127, the bending abilities of the elements or rods 202 and 402 are advantageous. Such bending abilities permit the elements or rods 202 and 402 to make minor adjustments to the bends and curvatures of the spar cap 126 design such that the elements or rods 202 and 402 substantially conform to the shape or contour of the spar cap 126. The spar cap 126 and the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400, each according to the invention, permit fabrication of the spar cap 126 with a structure that conforms or corresponds to the shape of the blade 20, while providing the blade 20 with its requisite structural support and load bearing properties.
The preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention, therefore, may be used to fabricate the spar cap 126 with a configuration suitable for use as a load-bearing structure in a twist-coupled blade 20. The spar cap 126 may be included in the twist-coupled blade 20 to help to construct the blade 20 with twist bend coupling abilities whereby the blade twists as it bends along its span L1 or horizontal axis. The spar cap 126 construction according to the invention may help to facilitate the ability of the twist-coupled blade 20 to mitigate aerodynamic loads. During operation of the turbine, the blade 20 bends in response to the aerodynamic loads acting on the blade 20 and also twists to alter its aerodynamic performance. Specifically, the blade 20 passively pitches to feather in response to wind loads such that the blade 20 passively and rapidly sheds such loads. Incorporating the spar cap 126 according to the invention into a bending/twist-coupled blade 20 may help the blade 20 to respond rapidly to wind gusts and to rotational speeds, as well as may help to reduce fatigue damage to the blade 20 over a range of wind speed conditions.
In addition, the minute spaces 500 between the individual strength elements or rods 202 help to facilitate penetration of bonding resin 502 into a stacked formation 128 of multiple preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 or a stacked formation 128 of multiple preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 stacked, layered or interleaved with multiple fibrous layers 602. The spaces 500 facilitate flow and penetration of the bonding resin 502 between individual elements or rods 202 and 402 and between preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 and multiple fibrous layers 602. As described below, rates of bonding resin 502 infusion or injection that are achieved in stacked formations 128 including the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention are relatively rapid in comparison to resin infusion or injection rates that are obtained with applications of bonding resin 502 to prior art fibrous and composite materials and laminates used to construct spar caps.
Referring to
Referring to
A given number of strength elements or rods 202 and 402 is arranged along the carrier layer 312 in a single layer with individual elements or rods 202 and 402 adjacent, e.g., and substantially parallel to, one another along the length L5 of the elements or rods 202 and 402. As mentioned, the elements or rods 202 and 402 are affixed or bonded to the carrier layer 312 with an adhesive and may define between adjacent elements or rods 202 and 402 minute spaces 500. The fibrous carrier layer 312 may include a nonwoven fabric constructed of fibers, yarns, and/or rovings including, but not limited to, polyester fibers, yarns and/or rovings; polyamide fibers, yarns and/or rovings; polyolefin fibers, yarns and/or rovings; glass fibers, yarns and/or rovings; carbon fibers, yarns and/or rovings; aramid fibers, yarns and/or rovings; graphite fibers, yarns and/or rovings; or basalt fibers, yarns and/or rovings; and combinations thereof. In preferred configurations of the carrier layer 312 according to the invention, the carrier layer comprises glass or polyester fibers, yarns and/or rovings.
The fibers, yarns, and/or rovings of the carrier layer 312 help to increase the fiber volume of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 and, in particular, help to strengthen the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 along the spaces 500 between the elements or rods 202 and 402 in which the applied adhesive may reside. The carrier layer 312 thereby helps to increase the transverse and longitudinal strength of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400, such that, the resulting spar cap 126, or other blade components in which the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 is incorporated, helps to mitigate shear forces three-dimensionally.
In one embodiment of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention, the nonwoven fibrous carrier layer 312 includes a fabric comprising multiple transverse fibers, yarns and/or rovings that are disposed at a substantially transverse orientation, or at about 90°, relative to the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 when the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 is assembled. In another embodiment of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention, the nonwoven fibrous carrier layer 312 includes a stitched fabric, e.g., a biaxial or triaxial fabric.
The carrier layer 312 is constructed and arranged to serve as a substrate to which the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 are joined or bonded to retain the elements or rods 202 and 402 in a single layer. The carrier layer 312 may define dimensions, e.g., length and width, similar to the dimensions of the single layer of elements or rods 202 and 402 that form the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400. The layer 312 may include one or more fibers, yarns and/or rovings constructed of one or more materials, such as those identified above, suitable to facilitate permeation and penetration of the bonding resin 502 between individual strength elements and rods 202 and 402, and between individual preform layers 300A, 300B and 400, when the bonding resin 502 is applied to an assembled stacked formation 128. Stitching, bonding, and/or other method(s) to configure the fibrous carrier layer 313 may interconnect the fibers, yarns, and/or rovings. As described below with referenced to
One or more adhesive layers may be disposed along at least one surface of the fibrous carrier layer 312; thereafter, one or more strength elements or rods 202 and 402 are disposed along the coated surface of the layer 312 to form the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400.
Configurations of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 may include the fibrous carrier layer 312 comprising fibers, yarns and/or rovings having from about 3% to about 15% of the total weight of the unidirectional fibers 306 of the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 of a given preform layer 300A, 300B and 400.
Referring to
The peripheral border or selvedge 314 has a width W6 sufficient to help the border or selvedge 314 serve as a point of attachment or an attachment portion sized and configured to join or bond the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 with one or more components of the spar cap 126 and/or one or more components of the blade airfoil 100 or, more particularly, the shell portions 120 and 122 of the blade 20. For instance, the peripheral border or selvedge 314 of each preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 may be interleaved or overlaid with one or more fibrous layers 602 to help to secure the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 to one or more other components of the spar cap 126. In another instance, the peripheral border or selvedge 314 may indirectly or directly join, bond or interleave with one or more structural components and/or layers of the shell portion 120 and 122 of the blade 20, such as any of the layers 101, 103, 105 or 107 that form the shell portion 120 or 122. The border or selvedge 314 thereby helps to secure the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 to the spar cap 126, the blade 20 and/or any components of the spar cap 126 or blade 20.
Referring to
The preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 illustrated in
The preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 may further include a label or printed legend 340 that provides information and/or indicia related to the length of the preform layer and/or related to the station or position of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 in the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 of the spar cap 126 relative to other preform layers 300A, 300A and 400 and, if present, relative to one or more fibrous layers 602. Such information and/or indicia would help to provide direction in assembling multiple preform layers 300A, 300B and 400, with or without multiple fibrous layers 602, into the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127. Such information and indicia may further include a preform layer ply or sequential number that identifies the layer's position in the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 and/or other manufacturing details or specifications.
Additionally, the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 may include designations 342 that indicate the station(s) or position(s) at which the preform layer is to be separated, e.g., cut, from another adjacent preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 where one or more preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 are provided in a continuous web 510, as described in detail below with reference to
Multi-Layered Structural Components
Referring to
As shown
Referring to
One configuration of the structural component 702 shown in
In some configurations of the structural component 702 shown in
Other configurations of the multi-layered structural component 702 according to the invention are illustrated in
The layer arrangements shown in
The invention is not limited to the configurations of the multi-layered structural components 702 shown in
One or more structural components 702 may be configured and assembled into any of the configurations of the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 of the spar cap 126 according to the invention as described above. Referring to
Additionally, or alternatively, the structural component 702 may be configured and assembled with the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 in such a manner to help to reinforce one or more select areas along the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127. For instance, within the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127 constructed primarily of multiple fibrous layers 602, one or more components 702 may be used to at least partially reinforce select areas along the stacked formation 128 and composite beam 127, e.g., to provide additional strength and/or to eliminate or minimize wrinkling and buckling of the fibrous layers 602. In such configurations, the one or more preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 of the structural component 702 may define a low percentage, and as little as about 1% or less, of the total weight of a select reinforced area of the stacked formation 128 and composite layer 127.
Preform Layer Stacking Patterns
In addition, although individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 are shown in
Referring to
The stacking or layering patterns of individual preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 described above may advantageously affect the geometry and the size of spaces or voids 500 defined between individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 of a given preform layer and defined between elements or rods 202 and 402 of adjacent or stacked preform layers 300A, 300B and 400. In addition, the overall dimensions and geometry of individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 define the geometry and the size of spaces or voids 500. In preferred configurations of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 can have a nominally rectangular profile, as shown in
The substantially uniform thickness T2 and T3 and the substantially uniform transverse width W3 and W4 of the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 form the composite beam 127 of the spar cap 126 as a finished structure having a well-defined overall dimensions and, in particular, a well-defined thickness, with minimal irregularities. The substantially uniform thickness T2 and T3 and transverse width W3 and W4 of the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 also enable two or more preform layers 300 and 400 to fit well with other preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 and to define the stacked formation 128 with a repeatable close tolerance.
The substantially uniform thickness T2 and T3 and transverse width W3 and W4 of two or more preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 also provides opportunities to increase or maximize the packing density of the elements and rods 300 and 400 and to increase or maximize the fiber volume fraction of the stacked formation 128, such that, the composite beam 127 may be constructed with a reduced amount of material or a reduced number of preform layers 300A, 300B or 400. In particular, the structure of the strength elements or rods 202 and 402, which includes the substantially straight structural fibers 306 embedded in the matrix resin 308, helps to increase the fiber volume fraction of the members or rods 202 and 402, and to increase the net total fiber volume fraction of the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400. For instance, where the fiber volume fraction of the strength member or rod 202 and 402 is in a range of from about 50% to about 85%, and the total rod volume of the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 is from about 80% to less than 100%, the net total fiber volume fraction of the preform layer may be increased up to about 85%. As a result, less material or fewer preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 may be used to construct the composite beam 127 of the spar cap without compromising the fiber volume fraction. In addition, using less material or fewer preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 to form the composite beam 127 may produce a lighter and thinner spar cap 126. As a result of the minute spacing 500 between strength elements or rods 202 and 402, the individual elements or rods 202 and 402 provide greater bending and twist strength and produce stronger and thinner preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 without changing the spar cap 126 or blade 20 design.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In another configuration of the woven fabric carrier layer 313, the warp yarns or rovings 315 may be configured and/or have sufficient denier, such that, the warp yarns or rovings 315 are raised along one surface of the carrier layer 313. Such raised warp yarns or rovings 315 extend longitudinally along the surface of the carrier layer 313 relative to the longitudinal axis 304 of the unidirectional strength elements or rods 402 and help to serve as alignment features. The raised warp yarns or rovings 315 would assist placement of each strength element and rod 202 and 402 at a given position along the surface of the carrier layer 313.
In a further configuration of the woven fabric carrier layer 313, multiple longitudinal warp yarns or rovings 315 may be configured and/or have sufficient denier, such that, the warp yarns or rovings 313 are raised along both surfaces of the carrier layer 313. The raised warp yarns or rovings 315 would serve as alignment features to assist longitudinal placement of each strength element or rod 202 and 402 along a first surface of the carrier layer 313, as well as would serve as alignment features to assist placement of one preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 with another adjacent preform layer 300A, 300B and 400. The raised warp yarns or rovings 315 along a second surface of the woven carrier layer 313 opposite the first surface of the carrier layer 313 would facilitate stacking or layering the two preform layers 300A, 300B and 400. The carrier layers 313 may be further configured to facilitate stacking or layering preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 in a column, brick or random pattern.
The resulting preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 structure according to the invention, as mentioned, also helps to increase packing density and thereby helps to decrease the volume of bonding resin 502 required to form the composite beam 127 of the spar cap 126 from the stacked formation 128 of multiple preform layers 300A, 300B and 400.
Thus, the construction of the preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 and the stacking or layering patterns and arrangements of the preform layers according to the invention permit control of the dimensions of each preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 and thereby control of the overall dimensions and finished structure of the composite beam 127 that forms the spar cap 126. In addition, use of the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 helps to increase or maximize the net total fiber volume fraction, which helps to boost or maximize the fiber volume fraction of the spar cap 126, while reducing or minimizing the amount of material used to construct the composite beam 127. As noted, a reduction of the volume of bonding resin 502 applied to the stacked formation 128 to form the composite beam 127 is also possible. As a result, reductions in materials and manufacturing costs may be realized using the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention as structural components of the blade spar cap 126.
As described above, the minute spaces 500 between individual strength elements or rods 202 and 402 and between layered or adjacent preform layers 300A, 300B and 400, when formed into the stacked formation 128, help to facilitate penetration of bonding resin 502 during formation of the composite beam 127. Relatively rapid resin 502 penetration rates, e.g., on the order of several minutes, between individual elements or rods 202 and 402 and between individual preform layers 300A, 300B and 400, are possible. As shown in
Further, as mentioned, the mechanical properties of the preformed strength elements or rods 202 and 402 help to enable the elements or rods 202 and 402 to resist wrinkling and shrinkage during application and curing of the bonding resin 502. This eliminates the requirements for slow cure times and relatively low cure temperatures that are currently used in many prior art spar cap fabrication techniques to avoid wrinkling of fibrous and fiber fabrics, composites and materials. In addition, the structure and the mechanical properties of the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 and the resulting preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 according to the invention help individual elements or rods 202 and 402 resist fiber wash during injection or infusion of bonding resin 502. In particular, the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 resist fiber wash along the transverse width W2 of the stacked formation 128 of multiple preform layers 300A, 300B and 400 to which bonding resin 502 is applied. Resistance to fiber wash helps the preform layer 300A, 300B and 400 minimize or eliminate opportunities for the formation of undesirable wrinkles, kinks, or buckling along the composite beam 127 during its fabrication and ultimately along the spar cap 126. The increased rates of bonding resin penetration and the increased resistance of the strength elements or rods 202 and 402 to fiber wash effectively shorten the times required for resin penetration and curing during manufacture of the spar cap 126.
Continuous Web of Preform Layers
Referring to
The web 510 defines the plurality of individual preform layers 300A-H and 400A-H as multiple sub-lengths of the web length L5. In this configuration of the web 510, the sub-lengths correspond to the required varying lengths L4a, L4b, L4c, L4d, etc. of the preform layers 300A-H and 400A-H shown in
The web 510 further defines tapered end zones 512 across its width W5. The tapered end zones 512 define the web 510 into individual sub-lengths having the varying lengths L4a, L4b, L4c, L4d, etc. of the preform layers 300A-H and 400A-H.
As shown in
Still referring to
Each preform layer 300A-H and 400A-H has a thinned portion 320A, 320B and 322A, 318B along at least one of its ends. The rates of taper S3 and S4 of the thinned portions 320A, 320B and 322A, 318B may correspond to and may help to configure the taper of the thickness of the spar cap 126, particularly where the spar cap 126 is constructed primarily of preform layers. The rates of taper S3 and S4 may also correspond to the relative smoothness or continuous tapering of the spar cap 126. Such continuous taper may reduce or minimize the stress riser effect of an otherwise blunt cut or ground separation between preform layers. Typically, the minimum thickness of the thinned portions would be thin enough to reduce the stress riser effect to acceptable levels, and thick enough to maintain the longitudinal tensile strength of the web 510. For instance, such minimum thickness can be between about 5% to about 50% of the nominal untapered thickness. In a preferred embodiment, the minimum thickness can be about 20% of the untapered thickness.
The varying lengths of the preform layers 300A-C and 400A-C, and the rates of taper Sx of the thinned portions of the preform layers, may also determine the station or position of each preform layer 300A-H, 400A-H in the stacked formation 128. This is the case with the configuration of the web 510 shown in
The web 510 may be constructed with any number of preform layers 300A-H and 400A-H sufficient to supply preform layers 300A-H and 400A-H to partially or wholly construct one or more composite beams 127. The web 510 may be configured in a coil, or wrapped along a reel or spool, for purposes of storing and shipping the web 510 and for purposes of dispensing preform layers 300A-H, 400A-H during fabrication of the spar cap 126 and/or other components of the blade 20.
Structural and Reinforcement Preform Layers
Referring to
Having thus described at least one illustrative aspect of the invention, various alterations, modifications and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications and improvements are intended to be within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended as limiting. The invention's limit is defined only in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/530,071, filed Oct. 31, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/032,424, filed Sep. 20, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/585,339, filed on Aug. 14, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,540,491, issued on Sep. 24, 2013, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/007,111, filed Jan. 14, 2011, now abandoned, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/295,006, filed Jan. 14, 2010, the contents of each are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3591434 | Hartstien | Jul 1971 | A |
4332525 | Cheney, Jr. | Jun 1982 | A |
4339230 | Hill | Jul 1982 | A |
4350549 | Frehner | Sep 1982 | A |
4360871 | Blaney | Nov 1982 | A |
4366387 | Carter, Jr. et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373862 | Ferris et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4389162 | Doellinger et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4403918 | Schramm | Sep 1983 | A |
4407688 | Mussi et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4408958 | Schacle | Oct 1983 | A |
4439106 | Ferris et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4452658 | Schramm | Jun 1984 | A |
4470862 | More et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4473199 | Magill | Sep 1984 | A |
4474536 | Gougeon et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4494910 | Hahn et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4538780 | Roe | Sep 1985 | A |
4557666 | Baskin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4601639 | Yen et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4616977 | Schramm | Oct 1986 | A |
4621980 | Reavely et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4626172 | Mouille et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4626173 | Mouille et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4627791 | Marshall | Dec 1986 | A |
4643646 | Hahn et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4648921 | Nutter, Jr. | Mar 1987 | A |
4650534 | Mussi et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4657615 | Braun et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4671471 | Patmont | Jun 1987 | A |
4696623 | Bost | Sep 1987 | A |
4728263 | Basso | Mar 1988 | A |
4732542 | Hahn et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4739954 | Hamilton | Apr 1988 | A |
4784575 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4789304 | Gustafson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4789305 | Vaughen | Dec 1988 | A |
4789577 | Leone et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4806077 | Bost | Feb 1989 | A |
4892462 | Barbier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4971641 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4976587 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4990205 | Barbier et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5042968 | Fecto | Aug 1991 | A |
5076780 | Westman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5118257 | Blakeley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127802 | Carlson et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129787 | Violette et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5181829 | Pancotti | Jan 1993 | A |
RE34207 | Nelson et al. | Mar 1993 | E |
5224519 | Farley | Jul 1993 | A |
5248242 | Lallo et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253979 | Fradenburgh et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269656 | Maga | Dec 1993 | A |
5269657 | Garfinkle | Dec 1993 | A |
5269658 | Carlson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5314309 | Blakeley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320494 | Reinfelder et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324563 | Rogers et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332178 | Williams | Jul 1994 | A |
5340280 | Schilling | Aug 1994 | A |
5375324 | Wallace et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378109 | Lallo et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383767 | Aubry | Jan 1995 | A |
5401138 | Mosiewicz | Mar 1995 | A |
5403161 | Nealon et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417549 | Purse et al. | May 1995 | A |
5454693 | Aubry et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462408 | Coffy | Oct 1995 | A |
5462618 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5496002 | Schultze | Mar 1996 | A |
5527155 | Chen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5619903 | Rogers et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632602 | Herrmann et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636969 | Matuska et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5655879 | Kiely et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5716686 | Black | Feb 1998 | A |
5793138 | Kliman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798633 | Larsen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822845 | Gould et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839815 | Bieber et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845483 | Petrowicz | Dec 1998 | A |
5846054 | Mannava et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851105 | Fric et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853367 | Chalek et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859704 | Fric et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867980 | Bartos | Feb 1999 | A |
5877665 | Obasih et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885059 | Kovalsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892420 | Larranaga et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907192 | Lyons et al. | May 1999 | A |
5921500 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926887 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927644 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5960430 | Haimowitz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961288 | Rene Legendre | Oct 1999 | A |
5989702 | Draper et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6068905 | Wright et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104113 | Beifus | Aug 2000 | A |
6115485 | Dumoulin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121788 | Kliman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6140730 | Tkaczyk et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146097 | Bradt | Nov 2000 | A |
6150819 | Laskaris et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155784 | Carter, Jr. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170452 | Wisinski | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178617 | Larranaga et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179681 | Matos | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199664 | Tkaczyk et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224308 | Bieber et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227805 | Besse et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229867 | Kobsa | May 2001 | B1 |
6234423 | Hirahara et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234755 | Bunker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249204 | Larranaga et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250877 | Westphal et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256865 | Larranaga et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271638 | Erdman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282487 | Shiomi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285012 | Connolly et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289873 | Dunsworth | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291900 | Tiemann et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6305905 | Nagle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319346 | Clark et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324494 | Saban | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330985 | Manteiga et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330995 | Mangeiga et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348752 | Erdman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350968 | Connolly et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
RE37576 | Stephens et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6383602 | Fric et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398501 | Darkins, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401448 | Manteiga et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414408 | Erdman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429579 | Pastir et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445105 | Kliman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447254 | Holowczak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470071 | Baertsch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473677 | Hershey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479957 | Erdman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500790 | Minnick | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504895 | Dixon et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538406 | Kea | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539620 | Smashey | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542536 | Hershey et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556867 | Kohls | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571020 | Dumoulin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583705 | Schutten et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591781 | Degelman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600240 | Mikhail et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607165 | Manteiga et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6619578 | Stockman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631322 | Arthur et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6749043 | Brown et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750559 | Becker | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753511 | Mathews, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753873 | Dixon et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771903 | Cousineau | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6783326 | Weitkamp et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784806 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789390 | Hu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796770 | Gigas et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805948 | Yasui | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833632 | Becker et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847128 | Mikhail et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850821 | Weitkamp | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854563 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856039 | Mikhail et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870281 | Weitkamp | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872945 | Bartonek | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879055 | Becker et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883527 | Travaly et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888262 | Blakemore | May 2005 | B2 |
6890152 | Thisted | May 2005 | B1 |
6897577 | Weeber et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901159 | Baertsch et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6904124 | Stayer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924565 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6924985 | Kawakita et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931332 | Phansalkar et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931796 | Adriaansen et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940186 | Weitkamp | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942455 | Schmaling et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951443 | Blakemore | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959519 | Adriaansen | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969925 | Desy et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970588 | Baertsch et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6972498 | Jamieson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6973162 | Block et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6973396 | Shah et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6975752 | Dixon et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976829 | Kovalsky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985784 | Vandevanter et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985803 | Abdel-Malek et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986642 | Carter | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004724 | Pierce et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008348 | LaBath | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013203 | Moore et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015698 | Ponziani et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016793 | Ye et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018168 | Worthoff et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032388 | Healy | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053784 | Hatfield et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056095 | Gigas et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7063510 | Takeshita et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086834 | LeMieux | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093421 | Ponziani et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093422 | Ponziani et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094021 | Haubert | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095129 | Moroz | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095131 | Mikhail et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100438 | LeMieux | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105940 | Weesner et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118338 | Moroz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118339 | Moroz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119452 | Larsen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121383 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121795 | Moroz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126236 | Harbourt et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127373 | House et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127898 | Healy | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132757 | Steigerwald et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7138800 | Maier et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7144216 | Hessel | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148581 | Hershey et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153090 | DeLeonardo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153576 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154191 | Jansen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154192 | Jansen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154193 | Jansen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160083 | Pierce et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165945 | Kovalsky et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166928 | Larsen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168251 | Janssen | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7173399 | Sihler et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175389 | Moroz | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176812 | Kelley | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7179059 | Sorensen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180204 | Grant et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183678 | Sivasubramaniam et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188466 | Ponziani et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188478 | Bourgeois | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198134 | LeMieux | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7198471 | Gunneskov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7199482 | Hopewell | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202638 | Ye et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203078 | Datta et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217091 | LeMieux | May 2007 | B2 |
7218012 | Edenfeld | May 2007 | B1 |
7220104 | Zheng et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222048 | Petchenev et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224081 | Larsen | May 2007 | B2 |
7226894 | Raber et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7230347 | Brown et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234303 | Thiagarajan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235895 | Melius et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235996 | Middendorf et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239035 | Garces et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7239036 | D'Atre et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7239133 | Bowlds | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7239140 | Maier et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7242195 | Ponziani et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244102 | Delucis | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253537 | Weng et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7256513 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261517 | Uphues et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262520 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266174 | Birdwell et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271571 | Ye et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273349 | Cartwright | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275025 | Chan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276807 | Luetze et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282807 | Hornemann et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286960 | Jammu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289920 | Suliman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296977 | Bonnet | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298059 | Delmerico et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303373 | Viertl | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309930 | Suryanarayanan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312537 | Walling et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7312992 | Jory et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315769 | Balan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7318154 | Tehee, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7318958 | Wang | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321221 | Bucker et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322794 | LeMieux et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322798 | Cairo | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324412 | Im et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331803 | Steigerwald et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334989 | Arelt | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340151 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7342323 | Avagliano et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344360 | Wetzel | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7345373 | Delmerico et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346462 | Delmerico | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346469 | Taware et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348683 | Riesberg | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351040 | Livingston et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7352075 | Willey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7354247 | Bonnet | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355294 | Teichmann | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357462 | Uphues | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359223 | Datta et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360310 | Bagepalli et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360996 | Driver | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363808 | Ormel et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367780 | Kothnur et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7372173 | Lutze et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7375531 | Ponziani et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376491 | Walling et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377752 | Mohamed | May 2008 | B2 |
7378820 | Liu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379169 | Kraemer et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7381029 | Moroz | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7384620 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387491 | Saddoughi et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389151 | Badami et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391126 | Liu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393180 | Von Mutius | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7393184 | Cairo | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7394166 | Teichmann et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397143 | Walling | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400054 | Wesselink | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410342 | Matheny | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410674 | Rosenquest et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414331 | Datta | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7416583 | Colibaba-Evulet | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417332 | Malakhova et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417333 | Miller et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420289 | Wang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7421354 | Brunell | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7423352 | Suryanarayanan et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7423411 | Sihler | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7423412 | Weng et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427189 | Eyb | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427814 | Bagepalli et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437216 | Riesberg et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437264 | Pierce et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438533 | Eyb et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443066 | Salamah et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443091 | Bewlay et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446435 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7449808 | Burgoon et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456695 | Weng et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7458777 | Herr | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465872 | de Rooij et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7466046 | Weeber et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468505 | Kraemer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468566 | Serrano et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470114 | Bonnet | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470860 | Lord et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471007 | Bucker et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471011 | Janssen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481624 | Wobben | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487673 | Ormel et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488155 | Barbu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488199 | Gonzalez | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494324 | Hibbard | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7501366 | Wolff et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7502215 | Krug et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503752 | Gunneskov et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504738 | Barton et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505833 | Delmerico et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506088 | Kothrur et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508173 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512209 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513742 | Rogall et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7514809 | Edenfeld | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517194 | Doorenspleet et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521835 | Qu et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522990 | Daum et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523001 | Morjaria et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530780 | Kothnur et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7532490 | Datta et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7538446 | Bonnet | May 2009 | B2 |
7540629 | Steinberg | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546477 | Breen et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548008 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548064 | Wang et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7550972 | Maier et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7551130 | Altenschulte | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554457 | Hounschell, II | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560823 | Schellings | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7560906 | Liu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7561066 | Ashton | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565729 | Adis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571057 | D'Amato et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7572432 | Gudlavalleti et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7573149 | Kammer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7573160 | Cardinal et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7573168 | Carl, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7573732 | Teichmann et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576443 | Raju | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581921 | Bagepalli et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586206 | Barton et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586216 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588421 | Burdgick et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590485 | Daum et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594800 | Teipen | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596002 | Teichmann | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600964 | Rogall et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7604461 | Bonnet | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605487 | Barton et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607351 | Allison et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608937 | Altenschulte | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7608939 | Bagepalli et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613548 | Cardinal et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7614850 | Rog all | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625185 | Wobben | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8529717 | Hedges et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540491 | Gruhn et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8876483 | Gruhn | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20010039700 | Krueger | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030082380 | Hager et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040047735 | Cartwright | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050008804 | Davies et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013694 | Kovalsky et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050059309 | Tsotsis | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050186081 | Mohamed | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060089068 | Hartman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060110256 | Gigas et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060141216 | Hartman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060204763 | Hartman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060225278 | Lin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070066698 | Yang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126026 | Driver | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140861 | Wobben | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070183888 | Gunneskov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189902 | Mohamed | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193491 | Lilleheden et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217918 | Baker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231154 | Burdgick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070231155 | Burdgick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243387 | Lin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251090 | Breugel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080069699 | Bech | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085658 | Hartman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080159871 | Bech | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161781 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080206055 | Godsk et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206059 | Hancock et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206062 | Sanz Pascual et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206551 | Hartman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219851 | Althoff et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226459 | Enenkl et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260538 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080295755 | Weimer | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310964 | Llorente Gonzalez et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310965 | Gerakis et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010764 | Parisy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028704 | Rebsdorf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028705 | Meldgaard et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061713 | Lin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062441 | Wei et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062442 | Wei et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062446 | Wei et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068017 | Rudling | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074573 | Rebsdorf et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084932 | Livingston | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090087318 | Althoff et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090104038 | Grabau | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116968 | Mohle | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136355 | Finnigan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140527 | Pawar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148285 | Scholte-Wassink | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148291 | Gerber et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148300 | Driver et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148302 | Leahy et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148303 | Leahy et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155084 | Livingston et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155086 | Parisy et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162208 | Zirin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162604 | Adolphs | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175731 | Burchardt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189325 | Callis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191062 | Metivier | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191063 | Baker et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196755 | Peace et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090196756 | Althoff | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090196757 | Baker et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090196758 | Baker et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202354 | Godsk et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202355 | Dierksmeier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208341 | Llorente Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220747 | Karem | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090226325 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229747 | Olson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090269205 | Leahy et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20120027609 | Ogde et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140003956 | Lull et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19624912 | Jan 1997 | DE |
2341239 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2524134 | May 2014 | EP |
2728169 | May 2014 | EP |
199305888 | Apr 1993 | WO |
2005011964 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-05011964 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006082479 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2009059604 | May 2009 | WO |
2009077582 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-09077582 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2011088372 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2014044280 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014086564 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report—Corresponding PCT Application No. US2016/012062, dated Apr. 25, 2016, 7 pages. |
Cairns, Douglas S., “The Application of Pre-Cured Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Pultrusions as Reinforcement in Composite Wind Turbine Blades”, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Jan. 8-11, 2007, Reno Nevada, pp. 1-9. |
Baker, Donald J. et al., “Evaluation of Carbon-Rod Reinforced Crippling Strength Specimens”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999, pp. 1-12. |
SynCore Design Guide, An Aerospace Technology Guide, Hysol, pp. 1-11. |
Griffin, Dayton A., “Blade System Design Studies Volume II. Preliminary Blade Designs and Recommended Test Matrix”, Global Energy Concepts, LLC, Jun. 2004, pp. 1-73. |
“Roving”, Wikipedia, Jan. 21, 2015, pp. 1-4. |
Rousseau, Carl Q., “Layer Termination in Graphite Rod Reinforced Structures”, American Helicopter Society, National Technical Specialists' Meeting on Advanced Rotorcraft Structures, Design Challeneges and Innovative Solutions Proceedings, Oct. 31-Nov. 2, 1995, pp. 1-38. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160177921 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61295006 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14530071 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 15055603 | US | |
Parent | 14032424 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14530071 | US | |
Parent | 13585339 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14032424 | US | |
Parent | 13007111 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13585339 | US |