The present subject matter relates generally to wind turbines, and particularly to a wind turbine rotor blade having a spoiler.
Wind power is considered one of the cleanest, most environmentally friendly energy sources presently available, and wind turbines have gained increased attention in this regard. A modern wind turbine typically includes a tower, a generator, a gearbox, a nacelle, and one or more rotor blades. The rotor blades capture kinetic energy from wind using known foil principles and transmit the kinetic energy through rotational energy to turn a shaft coupling the rotor blades to a gearbox, or if a gearbox is not used, directly to the generator. The generator then converts the mechanical energy to electrical energy that may be deployed to a utility grid.
The particular size of wind turbine rotor blades is a significant factor contributing to the overall efficiency of the wind turbine. Specifically, increases in the length or span of a rotor blade may generally lead to an overall increase in the energy production of a wind turbine. Accordingly, efforts to increase the size of rotor blades aid in the continuing growth of wind turbine technology and the adoption of wind energy as an alternative energy source. However, as rotor blade sizes increase, so do the loads transferred through the blades to other components of the wind turbine (e.g., the wind turbine hub and other components). For example, longer rotor blades result in higher loads due to the increased mass of the blades as well as the increased aerodynamic loads acting along the span of the blade. Such increased loads can be particularly problematic in high-speed wind conditions, as the loads transferred through the rotor blades may exceed the load-bearing capabilities of other wind turbine components.
Certain surface features, such as spoilers, are known that may be utilized to separate the flow of air from the outer surface of a rotor blade, thereby reducing the lift generated by the blade and reducing the loads acting on the blade. However, these surface features are typically designed to be permanently disposed along the outer surface of the rotor blade. As such, the amount of lift generated by the rotor blade is reduced regardless of the conditions in which the wind turbine is operating.
Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,692,095 describes wind turbine blades with active spoilers on the low pressure side of the blade that rapidly deploy to control an overspeed condition. The spoilers are connected to an electrically operated clutch, which normally holds the spoilers in a flush-mount position. In an overspeed condition, the clutch releases the rope and the spoiler opens via a spring. The spoiler, however, opens against the force of the airflow over the blade and the spring must be of sufficient size and strength to hold the spoiler open as the rotor slows. Likewise, the clutch must be of sufficient size and power to retract the spoiler against the force of the spring.
Accordingly, the industry would benefit from a wind turbine rotor blade having a simple and cost-effective actuatable spoiler to reduce lift. More specifically, a rotor blade having an actuatable spoiler with a living hinge would be advantageous.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, a rotor blade for a wind turbine having a shell with a pressure side and a suction side and one or more spoilers is disclosed. The one or more spoilers may be spaced apart along a span of the rotor blade. The shell defines an outer surface along the pressure and suction sides over which an airflow travels. The spoiler includes a fixed end and a free end. The fixed end is connected to the outer surface so as to enable a hinge action. In one embodiment, the hinge action may be a living hinge. The free end includes a top flange and a bottom flange configured to engage opposite sides of the shell and is pivotal relative to the fixed end between a recessed position and an elevated position. Further, the free end has a range of motion limited by contact of the top flange and the bottom flange with the shell. As such, the free end is configured to separate the airflow from the outer surface when in the elevated position.
In another embodiment, the spoiler further comprises a wedge portion having a front face that tapers from the front face to the fixed end. Further, the front face is defined by the top and bottom flanges. As such, the front face may be configured to separate the airflow from the outer surface when the spoiler is in the elevated position. In still another embodiment, the spoiler may include a top side defining an aerodynamic surface generally corresponding to an aerodynamic profile of the outer surface. Further, the outer surface may include one or more recesses configured to position the spoiler such that the top side of the spoiler is generally aligned with the outer surface when the spoiler is in a recessed position.
In yet another embodiment, the rotor blade may include an actuator disposed within the shell. Further, the actuator may be configured to pivot the free end of the spoiler between the recessed position and the elevated position.
In further embodiments, a height may be defined between the top flange and the outer surface when the spoiler is in the elevated position. The height may range from about 1% to about 4% of the chord defined at a span-wise location of the spoiler. Further, the spoiler may be disposed a chord-wise distance from a leading edge of the shell ranging from about 10% to about 50% of the chord defined at a span-wise location of the spoiler. Moreover, the spoiler may be disposed a span-wise distance from a blade root of the rotor blade from about 50% to about 90% of span defined by the blade root and a blade tip.
In still further embodiments, the spoiler may include a flexible material. For example, the flexible material may be a laminate material or similar. In yet another embodiment, the fixed end may be affixed to the outer surface by an adhesive.
In another aspect, the present subject matter discloses a wind turbine including a tower and a nacelle mounted atop the tower. The wind turbine may also include a hub coupled to the nacelle and a plurality of rotor blades extending outwardly from the hub. At least one of the rotor blades may include a shell having a pressure side and suction side. The shell may define an outer surface along the pressure and suction sides over which an airflow travels. The rotor blade may also include a spoiler including a fixed end and a free end. The fixed end is connected to the outer surface so as to enable a hinge action. In one embodiment, the hinge action may be a living hinge. Further, the free end may include a top flange and a bottom flange configured to engage opposite sides of the shell and is pivotal relative to the fixed end between a recessed position and an elevated position. As such, the free end has a range of motion limited by contact of the top flange and the bottom flange with the shell. Further, the free end is configured to separate the airflow from the outer surface when in the elevated position. The spoiler may be further configured in accordance with any one of the embodiments set forth above.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Referring now to the drawings,
Referring now to
In general, the rotor blade 100 may include a blade root 104 configured for mounting the rotor blade 100 to the hub 18 of the wind turbine 10 (
In several embodiments, the shell 108 of the rotor blade 100 may be formed as a single, unitary component. Alternatively, the shell 108 may be formed from a plurality of shell components. For example, the shell 108 may be manufactured from a first shell half generally defining the pressure side 110 of the rotor blade 100 and a second shell half generally defining the suction side 112 of the rotor blade 100, with the shell halves being secured to one another at the leading and trailing edges 114, 116 of the blade 100. Additionally, the shell 108 may generally be formed from any suitable material. For instance, in one embodiment, the shell 108 may be formed entirely from a laminate composite material, such as a carbon fiber reinforced laminate composite or a glass fiber reinforced laminate composite. Alternatively, one or more portions of the shell 108 may be configured as a layered construction and may include a core material, formed from a lightweight material such as wood (e.g., balsa), foam (e.g., extruded polystyrene foam) or a combination of such materials, disposed between layers of laminate composite material.
It should be appreciated that the rotor blade 100 may also include one or more internal structural components. For example, in several embodiments, the rotor blade 100 may include one or more shear webs (
Referring still to
In general, the rotor blade 100 may be configured to include any number of spoilers 102. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the rotor blade 100 includes three spoilers 102 spaced apart along the blade 100. However, in alternative embodiments, the rotor blade 100 may include fewer than three spoilers 102, such as one spoiler 102 or two spoilers 102, or greater than three spoilers 102, such as four spoilers 102, five spoilers 102 or more than five spoilers 102. Additionally, each spoiler 102 may generally be disposed at any location on the rotor blade 100. For instance, as shown, each spoiler 102 is positioned on the suction side 112 of the rotor blade 100. In alternative embodiments, each spoiler 102 may be positioned on the pressure side 110 of the rotor blade 100 or may be positioned on each side 110, 112 of the rotor blade 100. Similarly, the spoilers 102 may generally be disposed at any suitable location along the span 118 of the rotor blade 100, such as from generally adjacent the blade root 104 to generally adjacent the blade tip 106. For example, in one embodiment, the spoiler 102 may be disposed a span-wise distance from the blade root 104 from about 50% to about 90% of the span defined by the blade root 104 and the blade tip 106, such as from about 55% of the span.
Moreover, each spoiler 102 may generally be positioned at any suitable location along the chord 120 of the rotor blade 100, such as by being spaced apart from the leading edge 114 of the shell 108 any suitable distance 124. For example, in several embodiments of the present subject matter, each spoiler 102 may be positioned a distance 124 from the leading edge 114 ranging from about 5% to about 90% of the corresponding chord 120 defined at the specific span-wise location of the spoiler 102, such as from 10% of the corresponding chord 120, such as from about 20% of the corresponding chord, and all other sub-ranges therebetween. However, in other embodiments, it should be appreciated that the spoilers 102 may be spaced apart from the leading edge 114 a distance 124 that is less than 5% of the length of the corresponding chord 120 or that is greater than 90% of the length of the corresponding chord 120. For instance, in one embodiment, the spoilers 102 may be positioned adjacent to the leading edge 114 of the rotor blade 100 or adjacent to the trailing edge 116.
Further, in embodiments in which the rotor blade 100 includes more than one spoiler 102, the spoilers 102 may be spaced apart from one another along the rotor blade 100 in any direction. For instance, in the illustrated embodiment, the spoilers 102 are spaced apart from one another in the span-wise direction. In other embodiments, the spoilers 102 may be spaced apart from one another in the chord-wise direction or in both the span-wise and chord-wise directions. One of ordinary skill in the art should appreciate that the “chord-wise direction” refers to a direction extending parallel to the chord 120 of the rotor blade 100 and the “span-wise direction” refers to the a direction extending parallel to the span 118 of the rotor blade 100.
Additionally, each spoiler 102 may generally extend any suitable length 107 along the rotor blade 100. For instance, in one embodiment, the spoilers 102 may have a length generally equal to the span 118 of the rotor blade 100 such that each spoiler 102 extends from generally adjacent the blade root 104 to generally adjacent the blade tip 106. In other embodiments, as illustrated in
Referring particularly now to
The free end 126 may also include a top flange 134 and a bottom flange 136 configured to engage opposite sides 121, 123 of the shell 108. As such, the free end 126 may have a range of motion limited by contact of the top flange 134 and the bottom flange 136 with the shell 108. Additionally, the spoiler 102 may include wedge portion 140 positioned between the top flange 134 and the bottom flange 136. The wedge portion 140 may include a front face 142 defined by the top and bottom flanges 134,136 that provides an air block/brake having a height 146 so as to separate the airflow from the outer surface 122 when the spoiler 102 is in the elevated position. Further, the wedge portion 140 may taper from the front face 142 to the fixed end 128. Accordingly, the wedge portion 140 may reduce lifts and loads acting on the blade 100.
The height 146 between the top flange 134 and the outer surface 122 may range from about 20 millimeters (mm) to about 50 mm, such as about 40 mm, such as about 30 mm. Further, the height 146 may range from about 1% to about 4% of the corresponding chord 120 defined at the specific span-wise location of the spoiler 102, such as from about 2% to about 3% of the corresponding chord 120 or from about 1.5% to about 2.5% of the corresponding chord 120 and all other sub-ranges therebetween. Thus, in such embodiments, the ranges of the heights 146 may generally increase as the spoiler 102 is positioned closer to the blade root 104 and may generally decrease as the spoiler 102 is positioned closer to the blade tip 106. In other embodiments, it should be appreciated that the height 146 may be less than 1% of the corresponding chord 120 defined at the specific span-wise location of the spoiler 102 or may be greater than 4% of the corresponding chord 120.
The wedge portion 140 may extend a portion of the width 127 of the spoiler 102 such that most of the width 127 consists of a thin, flexible portion. For example, the wedge portion 140 may extend approximately 25% of the width of the spoiler 102 so as to provide a thin, flexible portion (i.e. living hinge 138) that is approximately 75% of the width 127. Further, the width 127 of the spoiler 102 may range from about 70 mm to about 120 mm, such as about 90 mm, such as about 100 mm. In further embodiments, the wedge portion 140 may be a solid material or may be a hollow material. As such, the wedge portion 140 may be manufactured using the same material as other spoiler 102 components or may be manufactured using different materials. For example, as illustrated, the wedge portion 140 is a hollow material having a foam or similar material disposed therein.
The rotor blade described herein may further include an actuator 130 disposed within the shell 122. In general, the actuator 130 may be configured to pivot the free end 126 between the recessed position and the elevated position. Accordingly, it should be appreciated that the actuator 130 may generally include any suitable device capable of pivoting the free end 126 relative to the fixed end 128. For example, in several embodiments, the actuator 130 may comprise a linear displacement device configured to pivot the free end 126 of the spoiler 102 from a recessed position to an elevated position. Further, the actuator 130 may be configured to pivot the free end 126 of the spoiler 102 so as to vary the height 146 depending on the loads acting on the rotor blade 100. In particular, depending on the magnitude of the blade loading (e.g., the amount of the lift being generated by the rotor blade 100), the actuator 130 may configured to actuate the spoilers 102 to a specific height 146 designed to sufficiently separate the flow of air from the shell 108 so as to achieve the desired load reduction.
In one embodiment, the actuator 130 may comprise a hydraulic, pneumatic or any other suitable type of cylinder configured to elevate a piston rod 132. Thus, as shown in
It should be appreciated that any suitable number of actuators 130 may be utilized to move each spoiler 102 between the elevated and recessed positions. For instance, in one embodiment, two or more actuators 130 may be coupled to the free end 126 of each spoiler 102 at differing locations along the length 107 of the spoiler 102. In another embodiment, a single actuator 130 may be utilized to pivot the spoiler 102. It should also be appreciated that, although the actuator 130 and spoiler 102 are depicted as being oriented substantially perpendicularly to the outer surface 122 of the shell 108, the actuator 130 and spoiler 102 may generally be configured to have any suitable orientation relative to the shell 108.
Additionally, in several embodiments of the present subject matter, a top side 144 of each spoiler 102 defines an aerodynamic surface generally corresponding to an aerodynamic profile of the outer surface 122 when the spoiler 102 is moved to the recessed position. In such embodiments, it should be appreciated that the top side 144 of each spoiler 102 may be configured to define an aerodynamic profile generally corresponding to the aerodynamic profile of the outer surface 122 of the shell 108 in an area adjacent to the spoiler 102. For example, as shown in
More specifically, the outer surface 122 may include one or more recesses 125 configured to position the spoiler 102 such that the top side 144 is generally aligned with the outer surface 122 when the spoiler 102 is in a recessed position. For example, the fixed end 128 and the free end 126 may be positioned in opposing recesses 125 such that the top side 144 remains flush with the outer surface 122 when in a recessed position.
Referring now to
The embodiment of
Further, it should be appreciated that, when the rotor blades 100, 200 include more than one spoiler 102, 202 and/or one or more actuators 130, 230 coupled to the spoilers 102, 202, the actuators 130, 230 may be controlled individually or in groups. For example, it may be desirable to actuate only a portion of the spoilers 102, 202 disposed within the rotor blade 100, 200 in order to precisely control the amount of lift generated by the blade 100, 200. Similarly, it may be desirable to actuate the spoilers 102, 202 to differing heights depending upon on the span-wise location of each of the spoilers 102, 202. It should also be appreciated that any suitable means may be utilized to control the actuators 130, 230. For example, the actuators 130, 230 may be communicatively coupled to a turbine controller (not shown) of the wind turbine 10 or any other suitable control device (e.g. a computer and/or any other suitable processing equipment) configured to control the operation of the actuators 130, 230.
Additionally, in several embodiments of the present subject matter, the disclosed rotor blades 100, 200 may include any suitable means for determining the operating conditions of the blades 100, 200 and/or the wind turbine 10 (
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3144220 | Kittelson | Aug 1964 | A |
3360218 | Miller | Dec 1967 | A |
4039161 | Bauer | Aug 1977 | A |
4082479 | Rangi et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4160170 | Harner et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4180372 | Lippert, Jr. | Dec 1979 | A |
4189648 | Harner | Feb 1980 | A |
4193005 | Kos et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4204805 | Bolie | May 1980 | A |
4247252 | Seki et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4355955 | Kisovec | Oct 1982 | A |
4422820 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4431375 | Carter, Jr. et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4435646 | Coleman et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4500257 | Sullivan | Feb 1985 | A |
4504192 | Cyrus et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4522561 | Carter, Jr. et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4522564 | Carter, Jr. et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4557666 | Baskin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4565929 | Baskin et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4575309 | Brown | Mar 1986 | A |
4613282 | Wood | Sep 1986 | A |
4659284 | Wood | Apr 1987 | A |
4664596 | Wood | May 1987 | A |
4692095 | Lawson-Tancred | Sep 1987 | A |
4715782 | Shimmel | Dec 1987 | A |
4815936 | Stoltze et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5106265 | Holzem | Apr 1992 | A |
5253828 | Cox | Oct 1993 | A |
5354175 | Coleman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5391926 | Staley et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5527151 | Coleman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527152 | Coleman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5570859 | Quandt | Nov 1996 | A |
5907192 | Lyons et al. | May 1999 | A |
6105904 | Lisy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6254197 | Lading et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265785 | Cousineau et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6420795 | Mikhail et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427948 | Campbell | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6566764 | Rebsdorf et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6784566 | Thomas | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819086 | Wobben | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6856038 | Rebsdorf et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856040 | Feddersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6933625 | Feddersen et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7015595 | Feddersen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028954 | Van Dam et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7063501 | Selsam | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7075192 | Bywaters et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7109600 | Bywaters et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119453 | Bywaters et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7183665 | Bywaters et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7218012 | Edenfeld | May 2007 | B1 |
7276807 | Luetze et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293959 | Pedersen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303369 | Rowan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321221 | Bucker et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332837 | Ward et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7397145 | Struve et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419356 | Stiesdal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431567 | Bevington et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7434636 | Sutherland | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436083 | Shibata et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458776 | Llorente Gonzalez et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471007 | Bucker et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7488155 | Barbu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502215 | Krug et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513742 | Rogall et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7585157 | Quell et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591635 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592766 | Patel et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7604461 | Bonnet | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7617741 | Lowe-Wylde | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7632068 | Bak et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643928 | Soucy | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7677862 | Boatner | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709972 | Arinaga et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7745948 | Kerber | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7786608 | Menke | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802469 | Staedler et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808121 | Glynn | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7816801 | Guang et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821147 | Du Bois | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822524 | Tabata et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7848858 | Tabata et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869976 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884493 | Buskirk et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887284 | Merswolke et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891941 | Bevington et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7941259 | Tabata et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7944067 | Kammer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948100 | Nies et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8047233 | Clingman | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20060140760 | Saddoughi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070231151 | Herr et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080029255 | Orlandi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080175711 | Godsk | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090068018 | Corten | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074574 | Godsk et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090280009 | Brock | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284016 | Van Dam et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285682 | Baker et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100104436 | Herr et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110223033 | Wang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120134803 | McGrath | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 29 168 | Oct 1997 | DE |
10 2004 005 169 | Nov 2005 | DE |
10 2009 026 131 | Nov 2010 | DE |
0 350 425 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0 761 964 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 947 693 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 674 723 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 772 623 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1 896 323 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1 944 505 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2 085 610 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2 098 721 | Sep 2009 | EP |
4029063 | Jan 1992 | JP |
0015961 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0116482 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2007005687 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007065434 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007140771 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008113349 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008113350 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Brochure—WM 17S from Wind Matic. |
Brochure—WM 15S from Wind Matic. |
Article—“Wind Turbine Test, Wind Matic WM 15S”, Riso National Laboratory, Denmark, Jul. 1986. |
van Dam, C.P.; “Airfoils for Structures-Passive and Active Load Control for Wind Turbine Blades”, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of California-Davis. |
Vronsky, T.; “High Performance Cost-Effective Large Wind Turbine Blades Using Air-Jet Vortex Generators”, ETSU W/41/00541/REP, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150010400 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |