This application is a U.S. National Phase Application of International Patent Application No. PCT/BR2012/000356, filed Sep. 18, 2012, which claims priority from Brazilian Patent Application No. PI 1105449-2 filed on Oct. 19, 2011, the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a new windbreak supporting tower for reducing the speed of natural wind on open-air ore stacks with tension-integrity capable of supporting high loads of wind applied to the windbreak fences of the system known as ‘windfence’, also designated as towers of deviation, and which is characterized by comprising only a few construction elements and providing lower physical and visual interferences in stock patios of mineral ores and granulates.
Fences (‘windfence’) have been recently used for reducing the speed of natural wind on open-air ore stacks in patios of pelletizing plants. This is now a necessity due to the increasing enforcement of environmental protection laws and pollution control to the iron ore industry and other industrial fields which require large open-air stock patios for granulated mineral ores. The vertical support of windfences, which completely surround patios containing iron ore powder is made by latticed metal towers arranged on the boundaries of these patios.
Even though these towers serve the function to which they are intended, they are made of latticed steel sections (L, U, C, I or tubular sections) in a total of 55 to 60 welded elements weighting approximately 3.90 T to 10.8 T, with an average weight of 7.60 T per tower. They have base dimensions of =smaller tower (2.53×3.02 m triangular-shaped) and larger tower (4.31×3.45 m triangular-shaped) and height dimensions of =smaller tower (14.96 m) and larger tower (29.52 m) with an average height of (26.90 m). Besides, they require large concrete bases of the order of 50 m3 with dimensions of (5×5×2 m). These bases, in addition to having a significant cost, generate undesirable interferences with water, compressed air, gas and cable manifolds passing on the perimeter of mineral ore patios. Owing to these technical features, the currently existing windfence supporting towers have high manufacture, assembly and installation costs, as well as they require the adaptation of tube networks and manifolds passing on the perimeter of mineral ore patios. In addition, base dimensions of the current tower have a concrete volume about 5 times as great as the tower with tension-integrity that is the object of the present patent application.
Current windfence supporting towers may cause some inconveniences in installation areas, such as:
Therefore, the objective of the present invention is to provide a windfence supporting tower lacking the aforementioned disadvantages, comprising a tubular metal tower formed by a central tubular post and four inclined, structural tensile elements with the upper ends fastened to the post by means of a coupling ring surrounding it and the lower ends being fastened to the free ends of four yoke arms of compression tubes, which tubes have their four inner ends attached to the reaction flange of the yoke. Said flange is jointed to the central tubular post. Over the coupling ring, the central tubular post has an upper free height.
The outer end of each of the four bars comprising the yoke of compression bars, which supports four inclined structural tensile elements and separates them from the central post, also has at this point another connection to receive the four vertical tensile structural elements, which by means of tensioners are tensioned and anchored to the ground at four independent foundations located around the foundation of the central tube.
These vertical ties pull on the connection point of the yoke and in turn the inclined structural elements connected to the coupling ring, thereby providing stability with tension-integrity, which is the main feature of the present supporting tower for absorbing forces caused by the wind.
The vertical support of the windfence is located at sites equally spaced along the height of the compression structural member, the central tubular post.
Such towers with tension-integrity are spaced from 6 to 30 m apart along the ore patios and have a height of 15 to 30 m.
Another feature of the tower with tension-integrity is that the foundation thereof comprises a central base and four points of anchorage to the ground, which makes it easier to solve the interference problem as compared to the foundation block used in current towers.
A) Preferably the four inclined tensile structural elements are tubular cylindrical bars having the upper end attached to the coupling ring and the bottom end attached to the yoke of four tubular compression bars, which, in continuity, are each connected to the ground through four vertical tensile cylindrical bars, which individually are pre-tensioned during assembly by their bottom ends connected to lower tensioners, which are in turn individually anchored to the ground.
B) In a preferred embodiment, the reaction flange of the yoke is located at two fifths of the height of the central tubular post, the coupling ring of tensile forces with the central tubular post is located at four fifths of its height and the uppermost attachment point of the windfence at the free end of the central tubular post, over the coupling ring, is located at a distance equivalent to one fifth of the height of the central post.
C) In another preferred embodiment, the vertical tensile cylindrical bars, unlike B), are tensioned by their upper end by way of upper tensioners attached to the yoke of compression bars. The lower ends of each of the vertical tensile cylindrical bars are anchored directly to the ground.
The invention will be better understood based upon the disclosure of the appended drawings where:
a illustrates a side view of the lattice tower for windfence attachment for reducing the speed of natural wind of the current state of the art.
b illustrates a bottom view of the lattice tower for windfence attachment for reducing the speed of natural wind of the current state of the art.
c illustrates a top plan view of the lattice tower for windfence attachment for reducing the speed of natural wind of the current state of the art.
d illustrates an enlarged detail of the left lower part of
a-d depict lattice metal towers 10 of the current state of the art, which comprise from 55 to 60 steel sections with an average weight of 7.60 T. The triangular-shaped base 11 requires a concrete block 12 of the order of 50 m3 with dimensions of (5×5×2 m).
According to another feature of the windbreak supporting tower of the invention, the reaction flange of the yoke 5 is located at two fifths of the height of the central tubular post 1, the coupling ring of tensile forces 3 with the central tubular post 1 is located at four fifths of its height and the uppermost attachment point of the windfence at the free end of the central tubular post, over the coupling ring, is located at a distance equivalent to one fifth of the height of the central post 1.
According to yet another feature of the windbreak supporting tower of the invention, the vertical tensile cylindrical bars 6 are tensioned by its upper end by way of tensioners 9 attached to the yoke of tubular compression bars 4. The lower ends of each of the vertical tensile cylindrical bars are anchored directly to the ground.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1105449 | Oct 2011 | BR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/BR2012/000356 | 9/18/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/056324 | 4/25/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3063521 | Fuller | Nov 1962 | A |
3169611 | Snelson | Feb 1965 | A |
3226091 | Root | Dec 1965 | A |
3611652 | Rabenhorst et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3634989 | Rogers | Jan 1972 | A |
3866366 | Fuller | Feb 1975 | A |
4334391 | Hedgepeth et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4627333 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
5072555 | Geiger | Dec 1991 | A |
5485863 | Carter | Jan 1996 | A |
5632292 | Carter | May 1997 | A |
5832688 | Crissey et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5930971 | Etheridge | Aug 1999 | A |
5934301 | Carter | Aug 1999 | A |
6397872 | Carter | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6708707 | Dotterweich et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6857246 | Erbetta et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6901714 | Liapi | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6929017 | Byun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7703469 | Danziger | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20020170588 | Seo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030051749 | Baughman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201141221 | Oct 2008 | CN |
201225026 | Apr 2009 | CN |
0154577 | Sep 1985 | EP |
56048311 | May 1981 | JP |
58059106 | Apr 1983 | JP |
1250507 | Oct 1989 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in corresponding application No. PCT/BR2012/000356, mailed Nov. 13, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140237914 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |