This application is a National Stage Application, filed under 35 U.S.C. 371, of International Application No. PCT/EP2017/053608, filed Feb. 17, 2017, which claims priority to European Application No. 16160363.4, filed Mar. 15, 2016; the contents of both of which as are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a winder and a method for winding a roll from a paper web such as a paper web or a web of non-woven material.
Winders are commonly used for converting purposes when paper rolls that have been produced in a paper machine are converted into narrower rolls and the winder is commonly used in connection with slitters that are used to make the web narrower. An example of a winder is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,320,299. Winders may have support rolls or support drums on which the paper roll that is being wound is supported. Winders are also used for webs of non-woven material. The object of the present invention is to provide an improved winder and an improved winding method in which important parameters of the winding operation can be effectively controlled.
The present invention relates to a winder for winding a web roll of a fibrous web such as paper or a web of non-woven material. In the context of this patent application, the term “web roll” is to be understood as a roll of a fibrous web such as paper or non-woven material, for example a paper roll. The inventive winder comprises two support rolls for supporting the web roll during reeling and a core shaft for winding the roll of paper or non-woven material. At each longitudinal end of the core shaft, there is a carrier chuck in which the core shaft is rotatably journalled. The inventive winder further comprises a frame in which the carrier chucks are arranged to be movable towards or away from the support rolls and a rider roll arranged to be capable of acting against the roll being wound, e.g. a paper roll or a roll of a non-woven material. The rider roll is carried by a rider roll beam which is arranged to be movable in the frame such that the rider roll can be moved towards or away from the support rolls. The winder also comprises at least one actuator for moving the rider roll beam towards or away from the support rolls and at least one load cell is arranged to detect the force between the rider roll and the roll of paper or -nonwoven material, i.e. the web roll. According to the invention, the winder also comprises at least one actuator for moving the carrier chucks of the core shaft independently of the rider roll beam and at least one load cell arranged to detect the force with which the carrier chucks act on the core shaft. The inventive winder also comprises a logic control system connected to the load cells such that the logic control system receives measured values for the force between the web roll and the rider roll and the force with which the carrier chucks act on the core shaft. The logic control system is programmed to calculate the diameter and weight of the web roll based on machine speed and an assumed thickness and basis weight of the fibrous web being wound. Furthermore, the logic control system is arranged to control the actuators for the rider roll beam and the carrier chucks. The logic control system is programmed to control movement of the carrier chucks and the rider roll beam such that the sum of the forces detected from the load cells and the force resulting from the calculated weight of the web roll corresponds to a set value for the force between the roll and the support rolls.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, at least two load cells are arranged to measure the force with which the carrier chucks act on the core shaft, including at least one load cell on each carrier chuck.
In preferred embodiments, at least two load cells are arranged to measure the force between the rider roll and the web roll, including at least one load cell placed at each axial end of the rider roll beam.
In embodiments of the invention, the carrier chucks and the rider roll beam are moved in relation to the support rolls based on the calculated value of the web roll diameter.
Suitably, the logic control unit may be programmed to calculate an expected value for the force between the rider roll and the web roll and an expected value for the force with which the carrier chucks act on the core shaft which expected force values are based on the calculated diameter of the web roll. The value of the web thickness (for example paper thickness) can then be recalculated if the measured force values deviate from the expected values.
The winder further may comprise, at each axial end of the rider roll beam and the core shaft, at least one threaded bar which extends in the direction of movement of the carrier chucks and the rider roll beam. The actuators for the carrier chucks and the rider roll beam may then be arranged on the threaded bar and comprise threaded pieces arranged to interact with the threaded bar to move the chucks and the rider roll beam towards or away from the support rolls.
The invention also relates to a method of winding a web roll (for example a paper roll or a roll of a non-woven material) in a winder which winder comprises two support rolls for supporting the web roll during reeling and a core shaft for winding the web roll, i.e. a core shaft upon which the web roll is wound. In the winder used in the inventive method, there is also, at each longitudinal end of the core shaft, a carrier chuck in which the core shaft is rotatably journalled and a frame in which the carrier chucks are arranged to be movable towards or away from the support rolls as well as a rider roll arranged to be capable of acting against the web roll. The winder also has a rider roll beam carrying the rider roll and the rider roll beam is arranged to be movable in the frame such that the rider roll can be moved towards or away from the support rolls. In the inventive method, the force with which the rider roll acts on the web roll is detected. According to the invention, the force with which the core shaft acts on the web roll is also detected and the weight of the web roll is continuously calculated based on the machine speed, given values for web thickness and basis weight, for example thickness and basis weight of a fibrous web. The resulting force from the rider roll, the core shaft and the weight of the web roll is continuously calculated and compared to a set desired value for nip force between the web roll and the support rolls. The purpose of this is to see if the calculated resulting force matches the set desired value for nip force between the web roll and the support rolls. When there is a deviation between the calculated resulting force and the set desired value, the carrier chucks and/or the rider roll beam is/are moved until the deviation is eliminated.
With reference to
Reference will now be made to
With reference to
As can be further seen in
With continued reference to
The logic control system 14 is programmed to calculate the diameter and weight of the web roll 2 based on machine speed and an assumed thickness and basis weight of the paper being wound. As will be further explained in the following, the logic control system 14 is arranged to control the actuators 10, 11 for the rider roll beam 9 and the carrier chucks 6. Furthermore, the logic control system 14 is programmed to control movement of the carrier chucks 6 and the rider roll beam 9 such that the sum of the forces detected from the load cells 12, 13 and the force resulting from the calculated weight of the web roll 2 corresponds to a set value for the force between the web roll 2 and the support rolls 3, 4. The logic control system 14 may suitably comprise a computer.
Reference will now be made to
It should be understood that the actuator arrangement shown in
One alternative possibility that has been contemplated by the inventor is that instead of a fixed threaded bar 15 that is common to both actuators 10, 11, there could be separate threaded bars 15 for the rider roll beam 9 and the support beam 6a for the chucks 6. The rider roll beam 9 and the support beam 6a for the chucks can then be moved by rotation of the separate threaded bars. Since the threaded bars 15 would be separate, they can be rotated separately and interact with fixed elements 16, 17 such that the support beam 6a and the rider roll beam can be moved independently of each other. The embodiment with separate threaded bars 15 for the rider roll beam 9 and the support beam 6a is not shown in the figures but should be clear from the above explanation. In such an embodiment, the logic control system 14 may be arranged and programmed to control rotation of the threaded bars 15.
If an actuator solution using threaded bars 15 is used, there are thus at least two embodiments, one embodiment in which at least one threaded bar is common to both the actuator 10 of the rider roll beam 9 and the actuator 11 of the support beam 6a. This may be termed the “common threaded bar embodiment”. The other embodiment is the embodiment in which there are separate threaded bars for the actuator/actuators 10 of the rider roll beam 9 and the actuator/actuators 11 of the support beam 6a and this embodiment may be termed the “separate threaded bar embodiment”. In the common threaded bar embodiment, there may be two separate threaded bars on each side of the winder as indicated in
The actuators 10, 11 could also take other forms. For example, they may be hydraulic cylinders or any other kind of actuator that can move the support beam 6a and the rider roll beam 9.
By means of the actuators 10, 11, the rider roll 8 and the chucks 6 and thereby also the core shaft 5 can be caused to act against the web roll 2 and subject the web roll 2 to forces. For example, the rider roll 8 can be pressed more or less against the growing web roll 2 which causes a force FR to act against the web roll 2 (see
During operation of the winder 1, the carrier chucks 6 and the rider roll beam 9 are moved in relation to the support rolls 3, 4 based on the calculated value of the web roll diameter. With reference to
Reference will now be made to
With continued reference to
If the logic control unit 14 finds that there is a deviation, i.e. that the forces FR, FC and FW do not match the nip forces F1 and F2, the logic control system 14 will take correcting action. For example, if the logic control system determines that the sum of the forces FR, FC and FW acting on the web roll is greater than it should be to match the set nip forces F1 and F2 for the nips N1 and N2, (see
Similarly, if the readings from the load cells 12, 13 that reach the logic control unit 14 indicate that the sum of the forces FR, FC and FW acting on the web roll 2 is smaller than it should be in order to match the set nip forces F1 and F2 for the nips N1 and N2, the logic control system 14 will conclude that the nip forces N1 and N2 are below the set value. This can be counteracted by, for example, ordering the actuator(s) 10 to move the rider roll 8 downwards towards the support rolls 3, 4 to increase the nip forces F1, F2 between the web roll 2 and the support rolls 3, 4. Alternatively—or in combination with such an order—the logic control unit 14 could order the actuator(s) 11 to move the core shaft 5 towards the support rolls 3, 4 until the readings from the load cells 12, 13 indicate that the set value for the nip forces F1, F2 between the web roll 2 and the support rolls 3, 4 has been reached.
Reference will now be made to
The logic control unit 14 is thus programmed to calculate an expected value for the force between the rider roll 8 and the web roll 2 and an expected value for the force with which the carrier chucks act on the core shaft 5 which expected force values are based on the calculated diameter of the web roll 2. The logic control unit can then recalculate the value of the web thickness if the measured force values deviate from the expected values.
While the invention has been described here in terms of a winder and a method of winding, it should be understood that the terms “winder” and “method of winding” only reflect different aspects of one and the same invention and that the method may include such steps that would be the inevitable result of operating the inventive winder, regardless of whether such steps have been explicitly mentioned or not.
Thanks to the invention, an effective control of the nip force between the web roll 2 and the support rolls 3, 4 can be achieved.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16160363 | Mar 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/053608 | 2/17/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/157609 | 9/21/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3104845 | Patterson, Jr. | Sep 1963 | A |
3232549 | Stambaugh | Feb 1966 | A |
3568944 | Besserdich | Mar 1971 | A |
3837593 | Dorfel | Sep 1974 | A |
3937410 | Justus | Feb 1976 | A |
4811915 | Smith | Mar 1989 | A |
5320299 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102011116308 | Apr 2013 | DE |
H05186115 | Jul 1993 | JP |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for Application No. 16160363.4, dated Sep. 30, 2016, 4 pages, Germany. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/053608, dated May 10, 2017, 14 pages, European Patent Office, Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190023515 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |