In general, the present invention relates to a counterbalance system for movable barriers such as sectional doors. More particularly, the present invention relates to a counterbalance system for a sectional door having an anti-drop mechanism that prevents uncontrolled closure of the door in the event of failure of the spring in the counterbalance system. More specifically, the present invention relates to a counterbalance system for a sectional door having a combined winding and anti-drop assembly for winding the counterbalance spring and preventing uncontrolled closure of the door in the event of spring failure.
Most sectional doors employ a track system that guides the door panels from a closed generally vertical position to an open generally horizontal position. Sectional doors normally employ a counterbalance system having a spring to counteract the weight of the door. Optimally, the counterbalance spring would have sufficient tension, such that the door would fully close and only a small amount of force would be necessary to raise the door from the closed position. Counterbalancing springs can be either extension springs or torsion springs. Torsion spring counterbalance systems normally have an axle to distribute the torsional force from the counterbalance spring or springs equally to the door through cable storage drums and cables attached thereto. The counterbalance springs can either be enclosed within the axle or placed outside an axle. The counterbalance springs are pre-tensioned during installation.
Safety considerations dictate the need for a device that prevents the door from falling in the event of eventual failure of one of the components of the counterbalance system, for example, the rupture of the counterbalance spring. Failure of the counterbalance spring while the door is partially open can result in the unexpected and uncontrolled closure of the door. This may cause inconvenience to the user, as well as present safety concerns to anyone located underneath the door at the moment of spring failure. Consequently anti-drop assemblies have been developed that, upon failure of the counterbalance assembly, stop or at least slow descent of the door.
One type of anti-drop mechanism senses loss of tension in the counterbalance cable. The counterbalance cable attaches to the cable drum which, using force of the counterbalance spring and a driving force, raises the door to the upright position. If during operation the cable breaks, the cable in turn loses tension. An example of this type of anti-drop mechanism has a pawl that engages the cable during normal operation, and upon loss in tension, a bias member overcomes any remaining cable tension and pushes the pawl into contact with a stop surface to stop descent of the door. This mechanism is effective against cable breaks but does not protect against counterbalance spring failure.
In another type of anti-drop system, centrifugal force is used to brake the door upon counterbalance spring failure. Typically such systems include a stator, a rotor and a stop dog held in place by bias elements. If the counterbalance spring breaks, the door drops at speeds that are faster than normal operation. As the rotor spins, the centrifugal force overcomes the bias force and moves the stop dog into contact with the stator, thereby stopping the rotor. The reaction speed of these systems is slower than other safety systems, allowing the door to fall further and thereby increase the chance of damage or injury. Further, stronger components are normally needed for such systems, increasing the cost and complexity of the door control components.
Various other anti-drop systems employ arrangements where a counterbalance spring or its axle is attached to a ratchet wheel or a pawl such that upon loss of spring tension the pawl engages the ratchet wheel to lock the mechanism that effects raising and lowering of the door or other barrier. These systems are typically relatively complex in terms of the number and design of the component parts. Further, this complexity and the probability of deterioration or corrosion over years in an inoperative status makes operation of the system problematic when the counterbalance spring normally fails. In addition, many of these anti-drop systems are limited by their design to utilization with counterbalance systems wherein the torsion springs are mounted outside the axle.
It is an aspect of the present invention to provide a counterbalance system for a sectional door having an anti-drop assembly which prevents uncontrolled closure of the door in the event of failure of the counterbalance spring. Another object of the present invention is to provide such a counterbalance system having a combined spring winding and anti-drop assembly for winding the counterbalance spring and preventing uncontrolled closure of the door in the event of failure of the counterbalance spring. A further object of the invention is to provide such a counterbalance system wherein utilization of a dual spring counterbalance system permits the door to be opened, but not closed, when one spring breaks, thereby permitting access to remove vehicles from a building prior to replacement of the broken spring.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a counterbalance system for sectional doors which can be employed in conjunction with counterbalance springs which are mounted either inside or outside of an axle. A further object of the invention is to provide such a counterbalance system, wherein a combined counterbalance spring winding and anti-drop mechanism operates in conjunction with a winding end of a counterbalance spring, rather than the stationary end. Yet another object of the invention is to provide a counterbalance system having a winding or anti-drop assembly that requires only minor modification to the counterbalance spring winding device and the cable drum. A further object of the present invention is to provide such a combined winding and anti-drop assembly for a sectional door counterbalance system which requires relatively few additional or modified parts and thus can be implemented at substantially lower cost than other types of anti-drop systems.
In general, the present invention contemplates a counterbalance system for a door movable between a closed position and an open position having, an axle, a cable drum attached to the axle, a winding shaft interconnected with the axle by a counterbalance spring, and a pawl selectively movable between a first position for adjusting tension in the counterbalance spring and a second position for preventing rotation of the cable drum upon failure of the counterbalance spring, thereby limiting movement of the door toward the closed position.
c is an enlarged side elevational view similar to
A winding and anti-drop assembly according to the concepts of the present invention is shown in the accompanying figures, and generally indicated by the numeral 50. The winding and anti-drop assembly 50 is used in connection with a barrier such as a door assembly, generally indicated by the numeral 10. Referring particularly to
In general, door D may be an upwardly acting door, such as the sectional door shown by way of example in the drawings. It will be understood that the winding and anti-drop assembly 50 of the present invention may be used with other known doors. The door D may be constructed of a plurality of panels 21 including a top panel 22 and a bottom panel 23. The door D is supported on the guide tracks 16, such that upon opening the door D, the door panels 21 are sequentially transferred from a substantially closed vertical alignment to a substantially open horizontal alignment to store the door D in compact fashion above the opening. To that end, guide tracks 16 to either side of door D each include a vertical track section 17 and a horizontal track section 18 joined by an arcuate transition track section 19.
To facilitate raising and lowering of the door D, a counterbalance system, generally indicated by the numeral 25, may be employed to offset the weight of the door D. As shown, a counterbalance system 25 has a pair of cable drums, generally indicated by the numeral 15, carried on an axle 20, which may be solid or tubular, receiving a cable C coupled to the bottom of the door D (
Referring particularly to
Winding shaft 35 may thus be rotated independently of axle 20 to adjust the counterbalancing force generated by counterbalance spring 26. To facilitate the use of ordinary tools to apply tension to the counterbalance spring 26, a tool end 34 of winding shaft 35 may be provided with a faceted outer surface 33 and/or a tool receiving socket 36. For example, surface 33 may have a polygonal cross section, for example, a hexagon, providing a convenient bearing surface for a conventional wrench. Alternatively, or in addition to the faceted outer surface 33, tool end 34 may contain the tool receiving socket 36. The tool receiving socket 36 may be formed on any part of the tool end 34 to provide for the insertion of a tool that provides sufficient leverage to rotate the winding shaft 35.
In the embodiment shown, cable drum 15 is keyed or otherwise nonrotatably coupled to the axle 20, such that the cable drum 15 rotates therewith. For example, as shown in
Referring particularly to
The winding and anti-drop assembly 50 is provided to adjust and maintain the tension of counterbalance spring 26 as well as provide the safety anti-drop function. It will be appreciated that the winding and anti-drop assembly 50 may be included within a door system 10, or be provided as a separate unit to be used with or retrofit to existing systems. It will be appreciated that some modification of such systems may be needed, in the course of using winding and anti-drop assembly 50 with such systems and such modification is within the scope of the present invention. The incorporation of winding and anti-drop assembly 50 in the described door system 10 is provided only as an example.
As mentioned, winding shaft 35 may protrude axially outwardly of the cable drum 15 through cable drum bore 37 and may be rotationally supported on the bracket 40, as within opening 43 formed in the bracket 40. The winding shaft 35 has axial grooves 38 that engage splines 60′ in a winding ratchet wheel 60 for rotation with shaft 35 to wind the spring 26 relative to the axle 20. Referring particularly to
To provide an audible indication of engagement of the tooth 61 and to further provide a positive stop against movement of a winding pawl arm 71, described more completely below, a detent, generally indicated by the numeral 66, may extend from the trailing side 64 of teeth 61. The detent 66 is simply a protrusion formed on the trailing side 64 of tooth 61 that causes a displacement of the winding pawl arm 71, such that it snaps into place beyond the detent 66 with an audible “click”.
Teeth 61 of winding ratchet wheel 60 interrelate with the winding pawl arm 71 to incrementally maintain the rotational position of end 32 of counterbalance spring 26 by way of winding shaft 35. While the ratchet wheel 60 is shown with ten (10) teeth 61, it is to be understood that the number of teeth 61 may be increased or decreased depending on a desired tensioning increment. The tensioning increment, in terms of one revolution of ratchet wheel 60, is essentially inversely proportional to the number of teeth 61. In the embodiment shown, the ten (10) teeth result in a tensioning increment of 1/10 of a revolution.
Referring particularly to
As best seen in
Pawl 70 is selectively rotationally biased by a spring member, generally indicated by the numeral 91. In the embodiment shown in
The bias locator 96 is positioned on the pawl 70. In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
The winding and anti-drop assembly 50 automatically retains the position of winding shaft 35 and accordingly tension on counterbalance system 25 by arm 71 maintaining a locking engagement with ratchet wheel 60. In the embodiment shown, to increase spring force in spring 26 of counterbalance system 25, a winding force is applied to winding shaft 35 in a manner described above. Once the force of spring 26 of counterbalance system 25 is overcome, the wheel 60 rotates. Arm 71 of pawl 70 follows the contour of ratchet wheel 60. Once the user stops applying a tensioning force, the force of the counterbalance system 25 would cause the ratchet wheel 60 to rotate in the opposite direction catching the second surface 78 of arm 71 preventing release of tension produced by counterbalance spring 26.
Referring now to
As moving elements, the counterbalance spring 26 particularly and other counterbalance system 25 components are prone to eventual failure. Upon breakage of the counterbalance spring 26, the torsional force created by the counterbalance spring 26 on wheel 60 is released, freeing the pawl 70 to rotate away from wheel 60. Because the pawl is now biased in the opposite direction, the pawl 70 pivots so that arm 101 engages the wheel 80, as seen in
Arm 101 extends outwardly from the pivot axis 74 toward the wheel 80. Arm 101 has a first surface 102 that is engaged by the leading surface 83 of the teeth 81 and a second surface 103 that engages the trailing side 82 of teeth 81 to hold the second wheel 80 against rotation initiated by weight of the falling door. To provide a greater positive radial lock of the anti-drop pawl arm 101, upon engagement with trailing surface 84 of teeth 81, the second surface 103 of anti-drop pawl arm 101 may include a recess 104 adapted to receive the detent 86 of teeth 81 (
While the spring 91 may be manually manipulated to move extension 93′ along arcuate slot 96 between first slot end 98 and second slot end 99, winding and anti-drop assembly 50 may be provided with an arming mechanism, generally indicated by the numeral 120, to effect this spring positioning function. Referring to
While the winding and anti-drop assembly 50 described above is located at the right side of the counterbalance system 25 and door D depicted in
Thus, it should be evident that the winding and anti-drop assembly for door counterbalance system disclosed herein carries out one or more of the objects of the present invention set forth above and otherwise constitutes an advantageous contribution to the art. As will be apparent to persons skilled in the art, modifications can be made to the preferred embodiments disclosed herein without departing from the spirit of the invention, the scope of the invention herein being limited solely by the scope of the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
575572 | Parsons | Jan 1897 | A |
842936 | Case | Feb 1907 | A |
1194142 | Claus | Aug 1916 | A |
1936269 | Schaffert et al. | Nov 1933 | A |
2012336 | Blodgett | Aug 1935 | A |
2020831 | Greegor | Nov 1935 | A |
2064470 | Heckman | Dec 1936 | A |
2097242 | Robinson | Oct 1937 | A |
2099191 | Blodgett | Nov 1937 | A |
2185828 | Blodgett | Jan 1940 | A |
2294360 | Blodgett | Sep 1942 | A |
3412780 | Moler | Nov 1968 | A |
3685567 | Pemberton et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3699453 | Berenbaum et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3734161 | Pierce | May 1973 | A |
3865329 | Higbee et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3979977 | Dorma | Sep 1976 | A |
4253350 | De Tarr | Mar 1981 | A |
4282720 | Stottmann et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4356668 | Wagner | Nov 1982 | A |
4385471 | Gabry | May 1983 | A |
4472910 | Iha | Sep 1984 | A |
4520591 | Calvagno | Jun 1985 | A |
4570873 | Kurtti | Feb 1986 | A |
4583706 | Whitehouse | Apr 1986 | A |
4597224 | Tucker | Jul 1986 | A |
4604828 | Baarse | Aug 1986 | A |
4693453 | Ivan | Sep 1987 | A |
4697676 | Haake | Oct 1987 | A |
4704914 | Horng | Nov 1987 | A |
4817927 | Martin | Apr 1989 | A |
4914862 | Gregory | Apr 1990 | A |
4930182 | Eichenberger | Jun 1990 | A |
4940193 | Grabowski | Jul 1990 | A |
4956938 | DeMent | Sep 1990 | A |
4981165 | Miller | Jan 1991 | A |
5046544 | Coluccio | Sep 1991 | A |
5222327 | Fellows | Jun 1993 | A |
5239777 | Husselton | Aug 1993 | A |
5253693 | Marlatt | Oct 1993 | A |
5291686 | Sears | Mar 1994 | A |
5419010 | Mullet | May 1995 | A |
5482103 | Burgess et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494093 | Eiterman | Feb 1996 | A |
5605079 | Way | Feb 1997 | A |
5615723 | Carper | Apr 1997 | A |
5632063 | Carper | May 1997 | A |
5636678 | Carper | Jun 1997 | A |
5698073 | Vincenzi | Dec 1997 | A |
5706552 | Hsieh | Jan 1998 | A |
5743046 | Siegler | Apr 1998 | A |
5778490 | Curtis | Jul 1998 | A |
5865235 | Krupke et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5911797 | Trevorrow et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5964268 | Carper | Oct 1999 | A |
5971055 | Rohaut | Oct 1999 | A |
6024155 | Sharp | Feb 2000 | A |
6042158 | Horn | Mar 2000 | A |
6070641 | Budetti | Jun 2000 | A |
6125582 | Mondragon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134835 | Krupke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155327 | Wells | Dec 2000 | A |
6189266 | Mihalcheon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6253824 | Mullet | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279268 | Beaudoin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283193 | Finch | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6401792 | Mullet | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6527037 | Daus | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6655088 | Hormann | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6715236 | Mullet | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732842 | Nemoto | May 2004 | B2 |
6862845 | Schiks | Mar 2005 | B2 |
20030201077 | Mullet | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221801 | Beaudoin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230389 | Savard et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
340 337 | Aug 1959 | CH |
3413236 | Oct 1985 | DE |
37 10237 | Jun 1988 | DE |
0172351 | Oct 1988 | DE |
4003218 | Aug 1991 | DE |
G 93 10 792.7 | Mar 1994 | DE |
0678641 | Aug 1999 | DE |
0 151 427 | Aug 1985 | EP |
0 275 509 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 392 290 | Mar 1990 | EP |
1 010 851 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 030 028 | Apr 2004 | EP |
71.04356 | Sep 1972 | FR |
2697570 | May 1994 | FR |
2715965 | Aug 1995 | FR |
WO 03078773 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060137138 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |