Winding structure for efficient switch-mode power converters

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7427910
  • Patent Number
    7,427,910
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 19, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 23, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
Cutout and/or keep away regions are etched in the winding structure near the gapped center leg of a magnetic core. This reduces eddy current losses caused by the leakage field and improves current uniformity and current sharing between windings thereby increasing converter efficiency. Windings closest to the air gap are suitably formed with both keep away regions and cutouts. Windings a little further away are formed with only cutouts, and the windings furthest away are unchanged. This approach keeps the net winding losses low in the presence of a fringing field. The precise configuration is determined by the core structure, air gap and winding arrangements.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to switched-mode power converters and more specifically to an improved winding structure for the magnetic core that reduces eddy currents.


2. Description of the Related Art


Power converters are key components in many military and commercial systems and often govern size and performance. Power density, efficiency and reliability are key characteristics used to evaluate the characteristics of power converters. Transformers and inductors used within these power converters may be large and bulky and often limit their efficiency, power density and reliability. These deficiencies can be improved by using a high-frequency “switch-mode” architecture instead of traditional step-down configuration and by replacing conventional core-and-coil designs with “planar integrated magnetics.”


Planar integrated magnetics offer several advantages, especially for low-power dc-dc converter applications, such as low converter profile, improved power density and reliability, reduced cost due to the elimination of discrete magnetic components, and close coupling between different windings. For example, the integrated magnetics 10 shown in FIG. 1 for a current-doubler rectifier (CDR) comprises an E-core 12 and plate 14 wound with split-primary windings 16 and 18, secondary windings 20 and 22, and an inductor winding 24 (See U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,436). This type of core arrangement is referred to as an E-I core. Other core geometries, for example circular core legs, are also possible. The windings perform the functions of both the transformer secondary and the two inductors used in the CDR. The center-leg winding is used to increase the effective filtering inductance and carries the full load current all the time. The center leg is typically gapped to prevent core saturation.


As shown in FIGS. 2a and 2b, integrated magnetics 10 is implemented with a multi-layer printed circuit (PCB) 26 having copper traces that form the various “horizontal” windings in the plane of the PCB. Horizontal windings refer to the configuration in which the winding is oriented parallel to the core plate. In one embodiment, E-core 12 is positioned underneath the PCB so that its outer legs 28 and 30 extend through holes in the PCB that coincide with the centers of primary and secondary windings 16 and 20 and 18 and 22, respectively, and its center leg 31 extends through a hole that coincides with inductor winding 24. Plate 14 rests on the outer legs forming an air gap 32 with the center leg. In another embodiment, the E-I core is attached to the circuit board, and attaching the winding terminations to the circuit board traces completes the circuit.


The converter efficiency depends on a number of factors, including the DC and AC resistance of the windings. The DC resistance is essentially determined by the cross section of the winding. To minimize the DC resistance, the windings typically almost fill the core window, having a minimal spacing of about 10 mils from the center and outer legs. The AC resistance is a function of skin depth at a given frequency and magnetic field impinging on the windings, which leads to non-uniform currents and eddy currents that may circulate in the windings. The impedance of the winding in the layered stack determines the current it carries. To minimize the AC resistance, the core and winding structure should be designed to avoid eddy currents, the fringing magnetic field on the winding should be minimized, and the winding impedances should be balanced to ensure equal current sharing.


However, as layers are added to provide the additional windings, which are required at higher output currents to reduce net dc winding resistance, to increase the core window area utilization or to interleave primary and secondary windings, the thickness of the multi-layer PCB increases. Some of the windings layers will inevitably be close to the air gap 32 where the strong fringing flux surrounding the air gap will induce eddy currents in the windings and also lead to non-uniform winding impedance. This in turn increases total winding losses and lowers converter efficiency.


As shown in FIG. 3, a typical distribution of the magnetic field 34 within one side of the window area of the magnetic core is very strong around the air gap 32. In this particular design, the fringing field extends vertically to about one-third of the window height from the air gap and horizontally to about one-fourth of the window width. As shown in FIG. 4, the field lines 36 of the magnetic field are generally perpendicular to the plane of the horizontal windings, especially near the air gap 32 and thus induce large eddy currents 38 in the entirety of the windings. These losses reduce the efficiency of the power converter. Furthermore, because the current in the windings closer to the air gap is attracted towards the high field, the currents flowing through them and consequent losses are highly non-uniform.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a winding structure for planar magnetics used in switched-mode power converters that improves converter efficiency and core utilization by reducing eddy current losses and improving the uniformity of the current in the secondary windings.


This is accomplished by forming “cutout” and/or “keep away” regions in the windings around the outer or center legs to keep both the AC and DC winding resistances low. The keep away regions are formed at the exterior edge of the winding nearest the center leg and serve to space the winding further away from the strongest leakage fields or fringing field. The cutouts are formed in the interior of the winding and serve to form an “island” in the winding that disrupts the induced eddy currents in the presence of moderate fields. The cutouts and keep away regions need only be formed on the portions of the windings near the center leg and in the windings nearest the air gap.


The air gap creates a fringing field whose strength decreases as it moves down and away from the air gap. Consequently when a plurality of windings are formed on the multiple layers of a printed circuit board, any of the windings that lie within a first multiple of a length of the air gap measured from the plate are formed with both an interior cutout and an exterior keep away region. Any of the windings that lie between the first multiple and a second multiple are formed with only an interior cutout. Finally, any remaining windings that lie outside the second multiple have neither interior cutouts nor exterior keep away regions. Typical values for the first and second multiples are five and ten, respectively. By configuring the stack of windings in this manner, the net AC and DC winding resistance remain low, losses due to eddy currents are minimized and the current through the windings is approximately uniform. As a result, the different windings are shielded from the deleterious effects of the fringing field.


These and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1, as described above, is a winding diagram of a standard E-core for use in a current-doubler rectifier (CDR);



FIGS. 2
a and 2b, as described above, are perspective and section views of a planar magnetic structure using conventional horizontal windings;



FIG. 3, as described above, is a plot of the leakage flux field (H) emanating from the air gap for the horizontal windings;



FIG. 4, as described above, is a diagram illustrating the magnetic field vectors from the fringing field in the window area that induces eddy currents in a horizontal winding;



FIGS. 5
a and 5b are sectional and plan views of the planar magnetic structures in which “cutout” and “keep away” regions have been etched in the horizontal windings to reduce eddy current;



FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the reduction in eddy current in the etched horizontal windings; and



FIG. 7 is a plan view of a center leg winding including “cutout” and “keep away” regions.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention modifies the conventional winding structure for planar integrated magnetics by etching cutout and/or keep away regions in the planar copper windings near the center leg. By accepting a marginal increase in the DC winding resistance, we are able to drastically reduce the AC winding resistance and the eddy current losses in the presence of a leakage field by at least 25%. The net result is improved current uniformity with lower losses, hence higher converter efficiency. Because the strength of the fringing flux decreases as you move down and away from the air gap, windings closest to the air gap are formed with both keep away regions and cutouts. Windings a little further away are formed with only cutouts and the windings furthest away are unchanged. The precise configuration is determined by the core structure, air gap and winding arrangements to optimize converter efficiency.


By way of example, the improved winding arrangement was implemented and compared to a conventional winding arrangement for a 100 W 1.5V output dc-dc converter for a 36-72V input. This design requires a winding arrangement with a 4:1 turns ratio including 4 primary windings connected in series and 5 secondary windings connected in parallel to support the required current. An optional inductor winding around the center leg was not implemented. The core is a standard gapped E-I core. An air gap of 0.25-0.30 mm was used due to the level of DC magnetic flux in the core center leg. The air gap and leakage inductance produce a fringing field that penetrates deep into the winding region. The copper cutouts and keep away regions are estimated to reduce winding losses by at least 25% and improve current uniformity. The conventional approach to avoid these losses would be to increase the size of the magnetic core to move the air gap sufficiently far away from the windings. Unfortunately this increases size, weight and cost significantly.


The winding arrangements described herein can be used in a wide range of switch-mode power converters including isolated and non-isolated current doubler rectifier (CDR) circuits, and boost and buck converters, as well as others. Furthermore, the winding arrangement can be implemented with a number of magnetic core configurations including standard E-I and E-E cores as well as matrix integrated magnetics (MIM) cores of the type described in copending U.S. Patent applications “Core Structure,” filed Apr. 18, 2002 and “Extended E Matrix Integrated Magnetics (MIM) Core” filed Aug. 19, 2004, which are hereby incorporated by reference.


A winding arrangement 50 for an integrated magnetic structure 52 for use in an isolated CDR is shown in FIGS. 5a and 5b. An E-core 54 includes a first outer leg 56, a center leg 58, and a second outer leg 60 on a base 62 and a plate 63 mounted on the outer legs forming an air gap 64 with the center leg. Winding arrangement 50 includes two primary windings 66, designated P1, P2, . . . P4, around each of the outer legs, and five secondary windings 68, designated S1, S2, . . . , S5, around each of the outer legs. The primary and secondary windings are alternated in layers 70 of a multi-layer printed circuit board (PCB) 72. The legs of the E-core are inserted through holes in the PCB.


To reduce the eddy currents induced in the windings by the fringing flux emanating from the air gap 64, keep away regions 74 and/or cutouts 76 are etched in the portion of the copper windings 66 and 68 on the PCB layers that lie within the core window areas. The keep away regions in the exterior edge 78 of the winding nearest the center leg are suitably 10 times the air gap length near the center leg 58 and serve to space the winding edge away from the air gap. No cutouts or keep away regions are necessary in those portions of the windings that lie outside the core window area. Windings are typically spaced about 10 mils from the center leg. The keep away region extends to about 55 mils from the center leg to the copper winding edge in the core window. The cutouts are formed in an interior 80 of the winding and span the core's horizontal window 82 to form an “island” 84 in the winding that disrupts the induced eddy currents. In this example, the cutout 76 is approximately 5 mils wide and the island is about 45 mils wide. The dimensions of the cutout are essentially constrained by the capabilities of the etching equipment. The dimensions of the island are dictated by the frequency of the switch-mode power converter, the output current, and the air-gap length. The cutouts and keep away regions need only be formed on the portions of the windings near the center leg. In this example, working from left-to-right on windings S5 and P4, the left edge of the winding is spaced approximately 10 mils from first outer leg 56 and spans a width of 147 mils to the 5 mil cutout 76, 45 mil island 84 and lastly the 55 mils keep away region 74 to center leg 58. The other sides of the windings away from the center leg do not require etching. In fact, etching portions of the winding not close to the air gap would have no beneficial effect on AC winding resistance and would increase the DC winding resistance. Accordingly, any windings around outer legs are asymmetric about those legs.


Because the strength of the fringing flux decreases as one moves down and away from the air gap 64, the windings S5 and P4 closest to the air gap are formed with both keep away regions 74 and cutouts 76. Near the gap, a slight increase in DC resistance is more than offset by the reduction in eddy current losses. Windings S4, P3, S3, P2 and S2 that lie a little further away are formed with only cutouts 76 to balance the effects of an increase in DC resistance against the effects on AC resistance. Finally, the windings P1 and S2 furthest away would see only a minimal benefit to AC resistance and thus are unchanged. The precise configuration is determined by the core structure, air gap, winding arrangements, converter specifications and switching frequency.


More specifically, any windings that lie within a first multiple of a length of the air gap (Lg) measured from the plate, e.g. 5 Lg, are exposed to the strongest fringing field, and hence are formed with both keep away regions and cutouts. Windings that lie between first and second multiples, e.g. 5-10 Lg, see less but still significant fringing field and are formed with only cutouts. The remaining windings are far enough away that the induced eddy currents are negligible. By configuring the stack of windings in this manner, the losses due to eddy currents are minimized and the current is approximately uniform in parallel-connected windings. As a result, the currents flowing through the different windings have lower losses. Furthermore, more windings can be implemented in the same core size, utilizing 80-90% of the available vertical window area 86.


As shown in FIG. 6, the formation of keep away regions 74 and cutouts 76 is effective to reduce the amount of eddy currents created in the windings. Because the winding is etched away in the keep away region 74, the strongest fringing field component H1 nearest the center leg does not see the winding at all. Consequently the strongest field does not create any eddy currents. The field component H2 that is a little further away from the center leg first sees a small strip of copper material, the island 84, in which only small and extremely localized eddy currents 88 are created. The bulk of the winding lies far enough away from the air gap that the field component H3 is so attenuated that any induced eddy currents are negligible.


In some winding arrangements, the center leg 58 is wound to provide an inductor winding 90, designated L1, as shown in FIG. 7. The inductor winding increases the filtering inductance and thereby reduces voltage and current ripple and improves efficiency. In the case of an inductor winding, a pair of keep away regions 92 and 94 and a pair of cutouts 96 and 98 are etched in the copper windings 90 on the PCB layers. The keep away regions are formed at exterior edges 100 and 102 of the winding nearest the center leg 58 within the core's horizontal window 104 of the core and serve to space the edge further away. Windings are typically spaced about 10 mils from the center leg. The exterior keep away region increases the spacing to about 55 mils. The cutouts are formed in an interior 106 of the winding and span the core's horizontal window 104 to form an “island” 108 in the winding that disrupts the induced eddy currents. The keep away regions and cutouts are preferably symmetric around the center leg to maintain uniformity.


While several illustrative embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Such variations and alternate embodiments are contemplated, and can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An integrated magnetic structure, comprising: a magnetic core having a base, a center leg and outer legs on said base, and a plate on said outer legs opposite said base and forming an air gap with said center leg; anda winding around one of said legs and having an interior cutout towards said center leg without employing an insulative gap in said winding.
  • 2. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said winding is about 10 mils from said center leg.
  • 3. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said winding has an exterior keep away region that spaces an exterior edge thereof away from said center leg.
  • 4. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 3 wherein said winding is about 55 mils from said center leg.
  • 5. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 further comprising another winding around one of said legs.
  • 6. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1, further comprising: horizontal window areas between said center leg and said outer legs, andvertical window areas between said winding and said plate.
  • 7. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said interior cutout forms an island in said winding towards said center leg.
  • 8. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said winding is around said center leg and said interior cutout is formed in one side of said winding towards said center leg, thereby providing an asymmetric winding.
  • 9. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said winding is around said center leg and has a pair of interior cutouts formed on both sides of said winding towards said center leg, thereby providing a symmetric winding.
  • 10. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said magnetic core is mounted in a printed circuit board, said winding lying in a plane of said printed circuit board around one of said legs.
  • 11. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 1 wherein said interior cutout improves a uniformity of currents flowing through said winding.
  • 12. An integrated magnetic structure, comprising: a magnetic core having a base, a center leg and outer legs on said base, and a plate on said outer legs opposite said base and forming an air gap with said center leg; anda winding arrangement, including: a first winding, around one of said legs, having an interior cutout towards said center leg without employing an insulative gap in said first winding and an exterior keep away region that spaces an exterior edge thereof away from said center leg,a second winding, around one of said legs, having an interior cutout towards said center leg without employing an insulative gap in said second winding, anda third winding around one of said legs.
  • 13. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein at least one of said first, second and third windings is about 10 mils from said center leg.
  • 14. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said first winding is about 55 mils from said center leg.
  • 15. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12, further comprising: horizontal window areas between said center leg and said outer legs, andvertical window areas between said first winding and said plate.
  • 16. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said interior cutout forms an island in said first and second windings towards said center leg.
  • 17. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said first winding is around said center leg and said interior cutout is formed in one side of said first winding towards said center leg, thereby providing an asymmetric winding.
  • 18. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said first winding is around said center leg and has a pair of interior cutouts formed on both sides of said first winding towards said center leg, thereby providing a symmetric winding.
  • 19. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said magnetic core is mounted in a printed circuit board, said first, second and third windings lying in a plane of said printed circuit board around one of said legs.
  • 20. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said interior cutout improves a uniformity of currents flowing through said first winding.
  • 21. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein said interior cutout and said external keep away region increases a DC resistance of said first winding and reduces a winding loss in a presence of a fringing field emanating from said air gap.
  • 22. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein ones of said first, second and third windings form primary and secondary windings of a transformer.
  • 23. The integrated magnetic structure as recited in claim 12 wherein one of said first, second and third windings forms a winding of an inductor.
US Referenced Citations (136)
Number Name Date Kind
1376978 Stoekle May 1921 A
3358210 Grossoehme Dec 1967 A
3433998 Woelber Mar 1969 A
3622868 Todt Nov 1971 A
3681679 Chung Aug 1972 A
3708744 Stephens et al. Jan 1973 A
4019122 Ryan Apr 1977 A
4075547 Wroblewski Feb 1978 A
4327348 Hirayama Apr 1982 A
4471423 Hase Sep 1984 A
4499481 Greene Feb 1985 A
4570174 Huang et al. Feb 1986 A
4577268 Easter et al. Mar 1986 A
4581691 Hock Apr 1986 A
4636823 Margalit et al. Jan 1987 A
4660136 Montorefano Apr 1987 A
4823249 Garcia, II Apr 1989 A
4887061 Matsumura Dec 1989 A
4899271 Seiersen Feb 1990 A
4903089 Hollis et al. Feb 1990 A
4999759 Cavagnolo et al. Mar 1991 A
5027264 DeDoncker et al. Jun 1991 A
5068756 Morris et al. Nov 1991 A
5106778 Hollis et al. Apr 1992 A
5126714 Johnson Jun 1992 A
5132888 Lo et al. Jul 1992 A
5134771 Lee et al. Aug 1992 A
5206621 Yerman Apr 1993 A
5223449 Morris et al. Jun 1993 A
5231037 Yuan et al. Jul 1993 A
5244829 Kim Sep 1993 A
5291382 Cohen Mar 1994 A
5305191 Loftus, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5335163 Seiersen Aug 1994 A
5336985 McKenzie Aug 1994 A
5342795 Yuan et al. Aug 1994 A
5369042 Morris et al. Nov 1994 A
5374887 Drobnik Dec 1994 A
5407842 Morris et al. Apr 1995 A
5468661 Yuan et al. Nov 1995 A
5508903 Alexndrov Apr 1996 A
5554561 Plumton Sep 1996 A
5555494 Morris Sep 1996 A
5610085 Yuan et al. Mar 1997 A
5624860 Plumton et al. Apr 1997 A
5663876 Newton et al. Sep 1997 A
5700703 Huang et al. Dec 1997 A
5712189 Plumton et al. Jan 1998 A
5719544 Vinciarelli et al. Feb 1998 A
5734564 Brkovic Mar 1998 A
5736842 Jovanovic Apr 1998 A
5742491 Bowman et al. Apr 1998 A
5747842 Plumton May 1998 A
5756375 Celii et al. May 1998 A
5760671 Lahr et al. Jun 1998 A
5783984 Keuneke Jul 1998 A
5784266 Chen Jul 1998 A
5804943 Kollman et al. Sep 1998 A
5815386 Gordon Sep 1998 A
5870299 Rozman Feb 1999 A
5886508 Jutras Mar 1999 A
5889298 Plumton et al. Mar 1999 A
5909110 Yuan et al. Jun 1999 A
5910665 Plumton et al. Jun 1999 A
5920475 Boylan et al. Jul 1999 A
5925088 Nasu Jul 1999 A
5933338 Wallace Aug 1999 A
5940287 Brkovic Aug 1999 A
5956245 Rozman Sep 1999 A
5956578 Weitzel et al. Sep 1999 A
5999066 Saito et al. Dec 1999 A
6008519 Yuan et al. Dec 1999 A
6011703 Boylan et al. Jan 2000 A
6038154 Boylan et al. Mar 2000 A
6067237 Nguyen May 2000 A
6069799 Bowman et al. May 2000 A
6084792 Chen et al. Jul 2000 A
6094038 Lethellier Jul 2000 A
6097046 Plumton Aug 2000 A
6156611 Lan et al. Dec 2000 A
6163466 Davila, Jr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6181231 Bartilson Jan 2001 B1
6188586 Farrington et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191964 Boylan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6208535 Parks Mar 2001 B1
6215290 Yang et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218891 Lotfi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229197 Plumton et al. May 2001 B1
6309918 Huang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320490 Clayton Nov 2001 B1
6323090 Zommer Nov 2001 B1
6348848 Herbert Feb 2002 B1
6351396 Jacobs Feb 2002 B1
6356462 Jang et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362986 Schultz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6380836 Matsumoto et al. Apr 2002 B2
6388898 Fan et al. May 2002 B1
6392902 Jang et al. May 2002 B1
6414578 Jitaru Jul 2002 B1
6477065 Parks Nov 2002 B2
6483724 Blair et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489754 Blom Dec 2002 B2
6498367 Chang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501193 Krugly Dec 2002 B1
6512352 Qian Jan 2003 B2
6525603 Morgan Feb 2003 B1
6539299 Chatfield et al. Mar 2003 B2
6549436 Sun Apr 2003 B1
6661276 Chang Dec 2003 B1
6683797 Zaitsu et al. Jan 2004 B2
6696910 Nuytkens et al. Feb 2004 B2
6731486 Holt et al. May 2004 B2
6741099 Krugly May 2004 B1
6753723 Zhang Jun 2004 B2
6765810 Perry Jul 2004 B2
6775159 Webb et al. Aug 2004 B2
6867678 Yang Mar 2005 B2
6873237 Chandrasekaran et al. Mar 2005 B2
6944033 Xu et al. Sep 2005 B1
6980077 Chandrasekaran et al. Dec 2005 B1
7012414 Mehrotra et al. Mar 2006 B1
7034586 Mehas et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046523 Sun et al. May 2006 B2
7076360 Ma Jul 2006 B1
20020114172 Webb et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030197585 Chandrasekaran et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030198067 Sun et al. Oct 2003 A1
20050024179 Chandrasekaran et al. Feb 2005 A1
20060038549 Mehrotra et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060038650 Mehrotra et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060187684 Chandrasekaran et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197510 Chandrasekaran Sep 2006 A1
20060198173 Rozman Sep 2006 A1
20060226477 Brar et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060226478 Brar et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060255360 Brar et al. Nov 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2000-68132 Mar 2000 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060038649 A1 Feb 2006 US