This invention relates to window coverings and, more particularly, to display devices which allow decorators and purchasers to preview how various shade materials will appear on their windows before the shades are manufactured.
The past several decades have been marked by tremendous growth in the types of window covering materials that are available to purchasers. Starting with roller shades and slatted horizontal blinds, the field of window coverings has blossomed to include a wide array of different types of coverings. These have included pleated shades, Roman shades, cellular shades and many others.
To compound the number of choices available to customers, in each of the aforesaid categories, numerous types of fabric are available, and each type of fabric is often available in a broad range of colors, patterns and the like.
Among these many choices, there are shade materials which are transparent to some degree, as well as shade materials which are much more opaque, keeping out a much greater degree of light and providing a greater degree of privacy than is offered by shade materials that are substantially transparent.
To compound even further the difficulty in choosing among the many offerings available in the marketplace is the advent and increased popularity of double shades. As illustrated, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,205,334 in the name of Ren Judkins, double shades provide an opportunity to employ two completely different types of shades mounted together to cover the same window. With such double shades, the user has the ability to deploy only one of the two shades (which may, for example, be a relatively sheer pleated shade), or to only deploy the second shade, which may be a more opaque roller shade, or to deploy both at the same time. Because of the enormous number of possible choices of shade materials, compounded by the number of different sizes that may be needed, double shades are often purchased and manufactured on a custom basis.
A problem that is faced by the buyer is to envision how two different shade materials, which may seem appealing in a sample book or the like, will look on the particular window for which the shade is being purchased. It is often difficult to know whether a shade fabric will coordinate well with the paint or wall covering on the walls near the window, particularly when the shade material may have a different appearance depending on how much sunlight may be entering the room through the window in question.
While this difficulty is a concern with single shades, the difficulty is compounded when a customer is selecting two different shade materials to be used together in a double shade. In those instances, the customer will want to have a preview of how two different shade fabrics will look together as part of the same double shade, in terms of their colors, patterns, and their ability to block or transmit light.
One old—and inadequate—solution is to simply hold samples of the materials up by hand near the window which is to be covered. One drawback to doing this is obvious: one cannot step back more than a couple of feet to see how the shade material will look on the window if one is holding up the sample. The problem is compounded further when one wishes to preview two samples of shade material to be used together in a double shade. In this instance, it would be desirable for both samples to be held near and substantially parallel to the window, and spaced apart from each other by a distance that at least approximates the spacing that will exist when the two shade fabrics are mounted to a double shade.
Accordingly, a need has arisen for an apparatus for displaying samples of window coverings which will allow samples to be readily and releasably mounted to a window to permit the user to preview how the window shade material will appear on that window. In addition, such apparatus should permit two samples of shade material to be suspended, one behind the other, with the samples spaced apart to an extent which approximates the distance by which the two different shade materials will be separated if an when they are later used in a double shade.
The present invention addresses the foregoing needs.
One aspect of the present invention provides an apparatus for displaying samples of window coverings which comprise a base having a front and a rear. At least one suction cup is mounted on the rear of the base and is adapted to releasably engage a flat surface, such as a window. There is at least one support on the base, which support is adapted to releasably receive and hold a first fabric sample, such that the first fabric sample is suspended substantially parallel to the flat surface.
In one preferred embodiment, the support comprises at least one projection extending outwardly from the front of the base. The support is adapted to receive a fabric sample having an opening sized to fit over and be supported by the projection. As a further feature of the invention, the at least one projection has a plurality of support positions adapted to support fabric samples at varying distances from the front of the base.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the base includes first and second end portions. The at least one support comprises a recess in the surface of each of the end portions. The recesses are adapted to receive and releasably hold a first fabric sample which includes a hanger having a knob mounted on each end, with the knobs in the recesses. As a further feature of the invention, each of the end portions has a plurality of recesses, thus defining a plurality of pairs of recesses. Each pair of recesses is adapted to receive the knobs associated with a different fabric sample. The depths of the pairs of recesses differ, such that each fabric sample is suspended a different distance from the flat surface.
Yet a further aspect of the present invention provides a method for displaying samples of window coverings comprising the provision of an apparatus of the type described, mounting the apparatus on a window, and mounting a fabric sample on the apparatus. As a further feature of the method aspect of the present invention, a second fabric sample may be mounted to the apparatus, and positioned at a predetermined distance from the first fabric sample.
A more complete appreciation of the subject matter of the present invention and the various advantages thereof can be realized by reference to the following detailed description in which reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Turning now to the drawings and particularly the embodiment shown in
The base 12 includes a central portion 18 and first and second end portions 20 and 22. The central portion 18 and the first and second end portions 20 and 22 may preferably be constructed integrally from a single piece of suitable material, such as plastic. Alternatively, the central portion 18 may be made of fabric or other flexible material. However, for reasons which will become apparent below, it is essential that the central portion 18 be substantially inelastic, such that when the first and second end portions 20 and 22 are stretched apart, they will be spaced apart from each other by a fixed, preselected distance.
As best seen in
Mounted on the rear surface 16 of the base 12 are suction cups 28. Suction cups 28 will preferably be any conventional rubber or plastic suction cup that is capable of being releasably engaged with a smooth flat surface, such as the glass pane G of a window, as in
Referring again to
Each of fabric samples 30 and 32 also includes a hanger 36 mounted at the top thereof. The hangers 36 are preferably formed from rigid material such as plastic, and the fabric portions 34 are mounted to the hangers 36 by any conventional means such as adhesive or the like.
At the end of each hanger 36 is a rounded knob 38. It will be appreciated that the knobs 38 will be substantially cylindrically shaped and sized so that they will fit within recesses 24. Adjacent to each knob 38 is a neck portion 40 which is sufficiently narrow such that it will fit within opening 26. In addition, hanger 36 may include a handle 42 to facilitate removing samples 30, 32 from a sample case (not shown).
As seen in
Each of the recesses 24, 24′ has a preselected depth. The recesses 24 proximate the upper ends of end portions 20 and 22 will preferably be deeper than the recesses 24′ proximate the lower ends of end portions 20, 22.
Positioned in the interior of recesses 24 are permanent magnets 44. The surfaces of knobs 38 which are adapted to be placed within the recesses 24 will include at least a portion made of steel or other ferrous material that is adapted to be attracted to and releasably held by permanent magnets 44.
When fabric samples 30 and 32 are mounted to the apparatus 10, it will be seen that fabric sample 32 is mounted first, with the knobs 38 associated therewith positioned in the upper recesses 24, which recesses (as noted previously) are deeper than the lower recesses 24′. Once fabric sample 32 is mounted, fabric sample 30 is mounted, with its knobs 38 positioned in the lower recesses 24′ of the apparatus 10, which recesses are shallower than the upper recesses. The interaction of the permanent magnets 44 and the steel or other ferrous metal portions of knobs 38 will cause the fabric samples 30, 32 to be mounted on the apparatus 10 without a risk of the fabric samples 30, 32 accidentally falling out. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that instead of having permanent magnets 44 mounted within the end portions 20, 22, one can instead mount permanent magnets on the rear surfaces of the knobs 38, and have a steel or other ferrous metal surface within the recesses 24, 24′, achieving the same result.
As can now be best seen in
It will thus be appreciated that if the difference in depth between the upper recesses 24 and the lower recesses 24′ is approximately the same as the distance between the two different fabrics that will form part of the window covering that is to be built, the present invention thus permits a prospective customer to observe the two fabric samples 34 mounted on his or her own window in substantially the same relationship as will exist when the full window covering is assembled. In a preferred embodiment, this spacing is between about ½″ and about 1″, and preferably about ¾″.
Turning now to
As best seen in
The use of apparatus 50 will now be discussed in conjunction with two fabric samples 64, 66. Each of fabric samples 64 and 66 has a fabric portion 68 and a support portion 70. Within the upper support portion 70 are two holes 72 which are spaced apart from each other by the same distance as projections 60 are spaced apart from each other. In addition, the diameter of the holes 72 is large enough so that the holes 72 may be slipped over the projections 60, including the rounded upwardly projecting spacer 62, if so desired.
As now best seen in
Thus, as with the embodiment shown in
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1246629 | McLaren | Nov 1917 | A |
1847403 | Loughmam | Mar 1932 | A |
2315566 | Watral et al. | Apr 1943 | A |
2357320 | Fruitman | Sep 1944 | A |
2493530 | DeSaussure | Jan 1950 | A |
2876980 | Salter | Mar 1959 | A |
3000113 | Olson | Sep 1961 | A |
3738550 | Van Etta et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3775870 | Griggs et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4632241 | Brough et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4984693 | Belokin et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986426 | Niklaus | Jan 1991 | A |
D314482 | Walter et al. | Feb 1991 | S |
4991807 | Radnich | Feb 1991 | A |
5137158 | Brockway | Aug 1992 | A |
5232189 | Koch | Aug 1993 | A |
5241768 | Thompson | Sep 1993 | A |
5313337 | Byers | May 1994 | A |
D383327 | Loflin | Sep 1997 | S |
D392138 | Wu | Mar 1998 | S |
D393961 | Whitehead et al. | May 1998 | S |
5765699 | Griffin | Jun 1998 | A |
5913433 | Belokin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915573 | Drower et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
D418707 | Lowe | Jan 2000 | S |
D433838 | O'Hara | Nov 2000 | S |
6155523 | Pitre | Dec 2000 | A |
6237885 | Mitchell | May 2001 | B1 |
6330948 | Leto | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6588606 | Miller et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040188364 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |