This is a perfection of Provisional Application No. 62/002,781, filed on May 23, 2014, the disclosure of which is fully incorporated by reference herein.
When building energy efficient buildings, there are three main areas to address to make your building perform better:
The use of exterior insulation is a great and cost effective way to handle all three of foregoing items when done properly. There is a weak point with rigid insulation at the openings of windows and doors, however. General practices teach to build one's access (i.e., window or door) openings wider than the rough opening. The window/door can then be framed out with wider lumber to meet the additional depth of insulation at the attachment points for these windows and doors. While doing a good job of making an anchor point for the access (windows and doors) areas, wood framing makes for a very week point for insulation. Such points are called thermal bridges. At these thermal bridge points, cool air escapes through conduction in the summer while also letting cold air into your house in the winter.
At these same thermal bridge points, there is often a moisture management problem. See especially
Known insulation systems include, but are not limited to: the releasable/re-attachable window frame insulation system of Sahadeo et al. U.S. Pat. No. 8,479,462; the “adhearable” window insulation material of Shippen U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,811; the gasket driven window insulation approach of Ahonen U.S. Pat. No. 4,624,077; and Bauch's Removable Insulation System per U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,990. Internationally, there is also known the thermal insulation window structure of Foster Canadian Patent No. 1,275,200 and WIPO No. 2014/033,231 to Soudal.
The primary advantages of this invention include:
Such advantages are accomplished with:
Further features, objectives and advantages of this invention will become clearer when referring to the detailed description and claims made with reference to the accompanying visuals in which:
Prior to this invention, there were two known construction methods for mounting windows and doors with exterior insulation. The first and more commonly used method includes building a wooden frame (window or door) buck. This buck, typically made from dimensional lumber, forms a box shaped extension around (or inside of) the window/door rough opening to match the thickness of the exterior insulation being used. While this works for supporting the loads placed on the windows and doors, it fails in several other areas: first, dimensional lumber is not stable. It will shrink and warp causing issues where window flashing is installed, letting bulk water and air enter through these areas. Second, wood/lumber has a very minimal R-value, R1 per inch. So it conducts heat energy rather easily. This not only encourages energy loss, it also causes condensation to occur and the structural and health issues associated therewith. Third, in the winter months, the condensation that occurs inside the structure leads to mildew and mold. And when the moisture content of wooden frame members is raised, the structural members are more prone to rot. Finally, during the warmer months, cool temperature from inside the building conducts through the wooden framing causing condensation to occur outside of the wall. And some types of structural insulation won't let this water “escape” further proliferating the aforementioned issues.
The second known means installs windows and doors directly over the exterior insulation being used. While this may insulate the mounting areas, it causes other problematic issues. For instance, typical exterior insulation is not made to withstand the weight of some windows. That insulation will permanently compress over time causing air and moisture leakage and possible damage to the window itself. Insulation compression also results from the wind loads forces placed on these structural accesses (windows and doors) leading to additional leakage concerns. The installation of windows and doors over insulation sheeting may also void window and door manufacturers warranties due to these issues. If condensation or bulk water gets behind the insulation, it can easily migrate into the structure at the rough openings causing mold, mildew and structural rot.
The mounting of windows and doors in conjunction with exterior insulation has become such an issue that the FMA (Fenestration Manufactures Association)/AAMA (American Architectural Manufactures Association)/WDMA (Window and Door Manufactures Association) have formed an installation steering committee. That committee is working hard to develop new ways to properly install windows and doors with exterior insulation. They are calling the targeted improvement a “ROESE”, the acronym for a ROUGH OPENING EXTENSION SUPPORT ELEMENT. The committee defines this ROESE as a projection (“bump-out”) or extension to the structural wall framing at the rough opening perimeter. The function of the ROESE is to: (i) support the weight of the window, (ii) allow direct structural attachment of the window to transfer wind loads to the structure, and (iii) enable window alignment with the exterior plane of the FPIS (foam plastic insulation sheeting) for proper integration with cladding and/or water resistive barrier (or WRB). A suitable ROESE shall consist of a material and fastening method that can maintain a structural continuity between the surrounding framing and window.
This invention will improve the overall installation of windows and doors, both new and replacement. When used in conjunction with exterior insulation, these products will serve as a “bump out” or extension from the structural wall that will support and insulate while also acting as viable air barriers and bulk water shed points. These specially made and shaped sections of insulative material (uncoated, partially coated, or fully coated) will function to insulate the mounting areas of windows and doors thus minimizing (or even fully stopping) thermal energy loss. These pieces of L-shaped material will also better support the weight of the structural access (window or door) and further transfer wind loads to the structure. These insulation pieces get their strength from their size and shape as well as the materials used to construct them.
The individual pieces are direct molded or precision cut to fit the rough opening of a window or door surround with all joints being glued thereabout for giving the invention added strength and improved abilities to seal out liquid water. For a new construction, these pieces are installed before the window or door and the adjacent exterior insulation. The window or door is then mounted through the insulating pieces and to its structural framing members.
As best shown in the dimensional ranges of accompanying
Referring to
Representative materials for making the pieces of this invention include a rigid composition such as an expanded polystyrene (EPS), Neopor® as made and sold by BASF, an extruded polystyrene (XPS), a polyurethane, a polyisocyanurate, a compressed mineral wool, and a rigid fiberglass compound. Pieces made from the foregoing materials will stop thermal bridging at the structural envelope openings for both doors and windows. The pieces themselves should be the same thickness on the outside as that of the exterior rigid insulation before reducing in thickness where the piece will protrude through the wall assembly and into the structure's interior.
By making the thin “fin” that protrudes through the access opening, the invention makes the entire surround system stronger, more durable and more water resistant. These thin fins are glued and then further nailed (or screwed) in place compounding their overall strength of assembly. With an integrally formed unit, each piece/fin will be more air tight especially when glued at adjoining, mitered corners. When more preferably made from EPS or Neopor®, the pieces of this invention also become vapor permeable, thus allowing them to shed bulk water while letting trapped moisture escape trouble areas in the form of moisture vapor.
Designed for optimal water management for all four real-life water management concerns, bulk water, vapor permeability, water absorption, and water release, this invention saves energy for heating and cooling, while further supporting sustainable building practices.
The uniqueness of making these pieces in a preferred shape (and size) from certain rigid insulating foams addresses numerous environmental concerns and the rising energy costs that are driving local codes to adopt more energy efficient practices for new residential and commercial buildings. The rigid insulation that this invention provides does a great job of stopping thermal bridging and minimizing (or even eliminating) water leakage concerns around the access (window and door) frames proper.
In the accompanying drawings, elements common to alternative embodiments are commonly numbered though in the next hundred series. Now referring to
In accompanying
Per the present invention, insertion of the window W into aperture A is first preceded by the installation of numerous sections of insulation inserts, generally 10. The combination of four such inserts, two vertical 12, 14 and two horizontal 16, 18, form their own pre-installation framing 20 as best seen as the middle component in the cutaway view at
For best joining the framing 20 of inserts to its surrounding structural elements about aperture A, it is preferred that a plurality of nails 28 be used in and along each respective insert component, at an angle perpendicular to the direction of physical insert installation. As best seen in
Once the framing 20 is properly positioned, and the window W secured there against, a final step would include securing strips of flashing F to the top and sides of the window for encouraging water redirection away from where the window otherwise meets with exterior wall E.
For the other main subcomponent to insert 40, the thin leg component 44, there is its own short edge 52 which can range in size (i.e., thickness) from about 0.5 inch up to as much as 4 inches thick. The long edge 54 to thin leg component 44, by contrast, can range from about 2.75 inch up to about 14 total inches in length. And finally, for the thin leg component inner wall element that runs parallel to first corner face 50 of the thick base component 42, or second corner face 56, it can range in relative “length” from about 2 to as much as 8 inches long.
In the second alternative embodiment of
While several modifications of the preferred form have been described above, it will be understood that still other variations and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4030258 | Anders | Jun 1977 | A |
4430831 | Kemp | Feb 1984 | A |
4631866 | Otto | Dec 1986 | A |
6442912 | Phillips | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481170 | Savenok | Nov 2002 | B1 |
8109052 | Rosende | Feb 2012 | B2 |
9140051 | Kierecki | Sep 2015 | B1 |
20090056246 | Prince | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090205272 | Rosende | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100139187 | Medina | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110214370 | Stewart | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20150211285 | Deiss | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150354208 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62002781 | May 2014 | US |